Five STUPID "Science" Proofs For The Afterlife (Towards Eternity)

Added: 2026-05-12

[00:00:05][music] [music] [music] Today we will prove the existence of the afterlife with some signs that you see in your daily life but probably did not notice.

[00:00:27]>> Oh, really? Now? Well, unless those signs say free whiskey here, I seriously doubt they could possibly prove that some kind of heavenly reward place exists. But we shall let you try anyway.

[00:00:39]Fingers crossed it isn't a bunch of stuff that either doesn't prove or things that aren't real in the first place, cuz that would be embarrassing.

[00:00:47]Which one is harder? Constructing a building for the first time or constructing a second similar building right after? Of course, you say that making something for the first time is harder and doing the same thing for a second time is easier and much [music] more simple.

[00:01:01]>> I'm not sure about that cuz it depends entirely on the situation. Is it you on your own or with other people that might [clears throat] not want to be there for the entire duration of two builds? Did you start with enough material for both buildings or are you going to have to scavenge for more? Do you have the room for a second building, or are you going to have to squeeze it into a now much tighter space? Is that space stable and flat as the first? Since building on a mountain is probably much harder than in a field, how much time is there between the two builds? Cuz if you're older, you maybe aren't going to remember what you did first time and possibly not even be physically strong if it is long enough.

[00:01:41]But sure, all variables being the same, doing a project a second time is usually easier because of experience and yada yada yada yada. But life rarely works out quite that neat. Okay. Can we say that God under whose command the entire atoms of the universe serve like an [music] army cannot discharge this army and gather them [clears throat] again for the second time? [music] Why should it be unreasonable for God to create the universe again after having already created a similar one for the first time? Well, ignoring the fact that you are indeed assuming the conclusion that God even does a real in the first place when if you don't, this and likely every other argument is going to fall down around your ears. But ignoring it, it's an absolutely bizarre argument anyway.

[00:02:26]Are you trying to tell me that heaven isn't a unique alternative place, but is simply universe to electric bugaloo? Why would God even want to do things like that? Isn't the point of most religious worldviews that the universe as we know it and the life you live in it is some kind of test? What's the point of a test if you're literally going to be doing the exact same thing again? Also, if one, then why not two or three or infinitely more universes afterwards, all with their own life forms doing their thing? And considering they all themselves are so big that they can certainly sustain the life of one of [clears throat] nine infinite planets.

[00:03:05]Well, again, it's hard to see what the point could possibly be. Think of the Earth's surface which is renewed and refreshed every spring once more again.

[00:03:14]And the creation of different kinds of plants, different kinds of animals. The fact that Earth's face is resurrected every spring after its death in the winter is actually [music] a sign of a new creation. Well, that's just not how spring works. Forgetting the fact that in some places you don't even get spring in the traditional sense, whether that be because of all year heat or all year cold. But it's not a new creation and it's not really regeneration. It is cycles, stages in the lives of the various entities that inhabit that space and how they react to seasons and the various weather that comes with them.

[00:03:51]Fact is, many floren fauna, if brought to a year round hot place, would simply, if not immediately, exhibit different behavior. And hell, some things already don't change to the same degree.

[00:04:04]Evergreen trees stay green all year. And while there are some changes to the insides of them during the colder months, you would hardly call it regeneration just because the snow finally cleared up. Besides, there are no degrees of easy and difficulty [music] for God the Almighty. Naturally, a new creation will be infinitely easy [music] for God. I mean, the initial creation of the universe and the constant creation we see in the universe are also proof for [music] life after that. [laughter] So, your entire point about doing things more than once getting easier is utterly irrelevant anyway when applied to God.

[00:04:44]way to open up by going my first argument is completely redundant and that's not even addressing that again you have to actually demonstrate that omnipotence is actually a characteristics of a Gman who also you have to prove exist and finishing up with of course a thing that is not in any way a resurrection of anything but new entities being born yet that somehow proves an entirely separate universe that is also the same but nicer maybe damn if you are putting your strongest foot first. I cannot wait to find out how stupid your follow-up points are going to be. Holy >> A generous person treats others to the extent [music] of his wealth. For example, while a generous student can offer a cup of tea, a [music] generous king offers a rich and big dining table.

[00:05:30]Really, look, I'm not trying to on the desperately impoverished, I have very much been there myself. In fact, before starting this channel, I was at the level of a simple bag of chips from the takeaway was kind of a luxury. But a cup of tea is not generosity. A, as a British person, it's standard godamn operating procedure. Fancy a cuppper are the five most uttered syllables in British English. And second, as a person who cannot bloody stand tea, yes, I'll be returning my British card in the post soon. It doesn't feel generous. It just feels like a thing that I don't get to have and everyone else does. So, I just have to stand there like a fool with my free pint of whiskey. Simply [music] as the riches and generosity increase, treats increase accordingly. Well, what if [music] generosity and riches become infinite? God's blessings should be infinite since he is the one with infinite generosity and wealth. Again, I have to point out that where the tea is a social convention, so is the dining table meal. What you are calling treats of a generous host, others would call expectations. If there is a social cost to not providing something, in the rich man's case, being known as a bad host, then there's simply no generosity at play, which makes what you're about to attempt with infinity sound infinitely expected and not even remotely generous.

[00:06:56]Also, quick note on the tea analogy again. You can make near infinite tea with one tea bag. Therefore, tea more powerful than God.

[00:07:04]>> However, this definition does not fit in with [music] this small gas size of the world. and a short life that is put down with death. Because just as the earth is temporary and limited, human life is also temporary and limited.

[00:07:17]>> It's weird that you're going to argue there must be an infinite God who's going to treat humanity to an afterlife of infinite generosity where you seem to have missed that why doesn't he just do that here? Why can't he make this existence one of treats and fun and all that good stuff? cuz well yeah sure again the old well it is a test nonsense gets thrown about but it doesn't make any sense cuz if a finite test can reap infinite reward then the action will never be able to justify said reward the longer forever goes for the less and less you've earned it I feel a god smart enough to invent the everything is probably going to notice although mankind carries a desire for eternity in his soul he could not find this blessing on this earth so on One side there are infinite riches and infinite [music] generosity of God, but on the other side we have a limited world and a limited human nature. Assuming that all humans want infinity is a bit of a stretch, mate. Especially when you talk to anyone who's actually thought about this for even a second and especially especially anyone with problems that could potentially carry over. I mean, infinite existence with an anxiety disorder sounds kind of messed up and if you say, "Well, God do a fix of that."

[00:08:31]So, no free will then. Cool. If a person could just be changed by God on a whim, what makes you think they are going to get to be the same person at all?

[00:08:41]Frankly, it's kind of horrifying. No thanks. I think I'll take some sweet oblivion over infinite stress and or mind control. Thank you. Therefore, after making this logical constru, one can [music] say that there should be a place afterlife where God's infinite riches and infinite generosity can appear with no limit. [music] An eternal sun requires a mirror to be reflected eternally.

[00:09:04]>> It's not logical and it's not even really a contrast. It's two different ideas mashed together willy-nilly. But this all seems to come down to one thing. You don't like the idea that you are a finite being with a finite existence. Therefore, that can't actually be true despite that all evidence is to the contrary. But that's not even an argument. That's you wanting something to be true. So assuming that it has to be because you personally want it. That is not how anything works aside from me getting my Infin whiskey.

[00:09:33]>> Imagine a world famous architect like me, Marcen. Everybody knows that this architect always does his work in a most wise [music] way. He never wastes.

[00:09:42]>> I'll be honest, dude. The idea of everyone knowing about essentially anyone specific, let alone something as kind of mundane as the world's best architect TM. Especially when you consider that architecture, as much as it is a matter of structural stability and utility, is mostly one of taste.

[00:10:00]Just being the most efficient guy is just, well, not all that exciting.

[00:10:05]Nobody likes the Sydney Opera House or the Leaning Tower of Pisa because they're so efficient. Cuz even if they were, it's 100% because they are interesting to look at that anybody cares. And plenty of people don't like them at all. It It's just a dumb premise, is all, mate.

[00:10:22]>> All of his finished [music] works show us that he has a vice character and does never waste.

[00:10:27]>> All of his finished works throws out some undesirable ideas for your part.

[00:10:31]Like, he's either constantly taking on new projects, which means that that thing you asked him to do years ago.

[00:10:38]Yay, he's going to look at it sometime.

[00:10:40]He'll get around to it eventually, okay?

[00:10:42]Or perhaps worse, that there are just a ton of projects that he simply will never finish. I mean, I guess if you don't buy enough stuff to finish the builds, you'll never waste any of it.

[00:10:52]Technically, cuz he's not famous for finishing, just for not wasting. How very useful. Let's imagine that he worked for 19 years for the new palace [music] he's building and only the roof is left unfinished. In this case, if somebody says the architect will leave the building without finishing it with [music] a roof, that is if this person says he will let everything be destroyed in vain, he [music] will expose the palace to rain and wind. Would that be reasonable?

[00:11:21]>> Yes, absolutely. Just because someone has curated a public image that makes it look like they're the best, that doesn't mean they actually are. There are teen bajillion examples of individuals who are seemingly universally beloved, but then the mask cracks and everyone finds out that they're a horrible piece of So, a bit of healthy skepticism when some spends nearly 20 years on a single building when the average for a skyscraper is between 3 to five, possibly up to 10. You have to start wondering if he's just not up to the task or not as good as everyone thinks or was never that great in the first place. And it would be completely fair.

[00:12:02]Of course not. [music] An architect who does wise works during his life would not make such unreasonable and wasteful [music] work. At this point, the truth is wisdom. God is the ultimate lord.

[00:12:13]That is, he acts in a most wise way in all his works. From the functions of our organs to the exquisite abilities given to all creatures to the regular movements of the planets we can see.

[00:12:25]Prove of wisdom everywhere that all the work is done based on logic and [music] benefits. Your abundant credility is godamn naive my friend. Especially when you apply this same quote unquote logic to the universe itself cuz then your initial analogy completely fails. The universe doesn't have zero waste. The universe is almost nothing but wasted space and potential. It is in fact almost entirely empty for no real benefit, at least from the perspective of an all power boy. And it gets even worse when you consider the stuff that does have things in it. cuz we can see that those are hardly paragons of efficiency with strange design choices like the whole Vegas nerve thing that takes a big detour to get to where it's going along with putting air holes and hard holes in the same hole. Not to mention problems that crop up individual to individual that show just some really poor attention to quality control. It's shocking that humans don't have a robust warranty service. God built a palace like the earth and created living creatures for great purposes with unmeasurable expenses. [music] God put people on an important test. Of course, he will not waste all these valuable beings created [music] with great expenses by not finishing this palace of the world with a roof of afterlife.

[00:13:45][music] We see signs of wisdom in every work of God. And he would not make such a waste which is the opposite of his wisdom. God will definitely place the roof of afterlife on the top of this [music] place of world.

[00:13:57]>> First off, what expense? You said difficulty didn't apply to him. And financial/material cost is a difficulty of its own, so who cares? It would be like praising a billionaire for actually paying for his meal as if everyone else isn't expected to do the exact same just because he's rich. And I knew it's a test because of course. But again, a test that lets you do the exact same task over and over and over again instead of leading to bigger and better things is not a test. It's just wasting your goddamn time. And of course, there's you assuming that having no roof isn't part of the plan. There is a God. What's to say, live, do some stuff, die isn't exactly what he has planned for you. Why not be happy you got to experience anything in the first place instead of demanding God give you all the things that you think you deserve? You ungrateful little bastard.

[00:14:54]>> God is just. The desire we feel for [music] justice, even in the slightest injustice, is a feeling given to us to understand [music] God is just.

[00:15:03]>> Oh, God doesn't real. And the feeling of justice people tend to experience that, you know, likely comes from an evolutionary survival adaptation is exactly the kind of thing one might want the guy you make up to explain the universe to have, especially if you see justice as a good thing. Of course, your guy is going to be described as that.

[00:15:23]And when I say described, I mean that doesn't mean he's presented as such, but I'll put that down to poor writing instead of an intentional design choice.

[00:15:31]God's justice [music] appears in two ways. The first is that God created everything according to a measure and at a proper place. [music] We can see this everywhere. Many examples can be given such as a certain measure in the oxygen nitrogen balance in the air. The rotation of the planets with a certain measure or a certain amount of power and properties given to living creatures.

[00:15:53]That is a wildly broad definition that well I don't know anyone who would describe something being where it's supposed to be as justice. Aside from the other definition of justice that you're going to make, which would be prisoners being in jail. And what you are actually arguing here, whether you know it or not, and if you don't, oof, is fine-tuning. But the thing about fine-tuning arguments is that they are arguments that forget that of course you exist in a universe that supports your existence. You wouldn't be in it if you didn't, unless there was a god allowing you to be there despite its inability to support your life. Now, that would be an actual proof for the god guy. Whereas points like this actually make him accidentally redundant.

[00:16:38]>> The other manifestation of justice [music] is to punish the unjust and the guilty.

[00:16:43]>> Well, I really think God should start with himself. He knows what he did. And I will not stand another moment until he corrects his error and kills all the who man. And that's not just an excuse for me to sit around on the couch all day and order pizza. Wait a minute. However, we see that many cruelties and injustices in the world are not fully punished here. Think about it. People who killed millions of people can live a [music] comfortable life and leave this world. Or on the contrary, innocent people who have done good things all their lives [music] can be subjected to many injustices and persecution and can pass away in this way. Oh, this is just the same thing from before. I don't like something, therefore a way I would like it must be the way it really is. But that's just an argument from consequence. X results in a bad thing.

[00:17:29]Therefore, X cannot be true. But that's just very obviously not the case. If you want to use the world filled with injustice as proof that no actually it's super just really well I think you simply just don't understand how the world works mate.

[00:17:43]>> So the most important part of the rewards and punishments [music] is postponed a greater courtroom for the full realization of justice.

[00:17:50]>> Okay let's say that was true. But why though? Seriously God wants to prove how super mega hyper just he is but he's not actually going to turn up and do something about it until after the terrible things have happened. That's like a fire service that only ever turned up to smoldering ashes. And then going on to say that they have the fastest arrival to fire dows speed in the business. That's not some greatest firefighting force that's ever lived.

[00:18:16]It's a bunch of lazy laughing as heroes while they wait for the problem to solve itself. If an all powerful being doesn't meet out justice at the source, then he's either not all powerful or not even remotely just.

[00:18:29]Small crimes are tried in small courts.

[00:18:32]On the other hand, big crimes are tried in large courts. For example, if a little quarrel occurs between two people, they can be reconciled immediately. [music] However, a serious argument that ended up injuring each other can only be resolved in a great court.

[00:18:47]>> What are you talking about? Each of those things in most places are matters for smaller courts. You're talking about interpersonal conflict. Two people with grievances towards each other. Don't go to the higher courts. Higher courts are for crimes where the state is your opposition, not the person you hurt. And the same potentially for someone if they hurt you. And also assumes that even most conflicts get any kind of legal remedy whatsoever. Hint, they freaking don't. If you are going to use an analogy, try not to have one that fails immediately from your own ignorance.

[00:19:22]Godamn it. Similarly, the major crimes happening around the world are not resolved here immediately. [music] They are postponed to a larger court.

[00:19:30]The manifestation of the name just of God, which we see all over the universe, proves to us the afterlife and the great [music] court there. Again, if you want to use the existence of legal systems, a distinctly human construct, as proof that there are even higher courts, then you're going to have to assume that they would have an even higher or greater miscarriages of justice. And of course, again, endless completely missed opportunities for consequences. Not to mention the fact that many great crimes are actually punished. Gets what we decided is appropriate justice and then dies. Do they then have to do that all again? Would you have to answer for things that you've done but work to fix about yourself? The mistakes you've made? Are they going to get repunished because God's not had his go yet? Hardly seems just, does it?

[00:20:21]>> Think of a kid trapped in the fire.

[00:20:23]>> Hey, no thanks. If that's what you do for fun, that's on you. I prefer entire pits full of humans on fire. Now you're talking justice. Anyway, this is number five and you got my attention. Although that's not the same thing as me thinking, "You're about to say something worth it now." Just so you know.

[00:20:40]>> Her mother comes right away and saves her child from the fire. Afterward, [music] she takes care of all his needs personally. She meets every need of her child [music] from health to nutrition.

[00:20:51]She even buys a special house with 10 floors for him and prepares an environment where he will live happily throughout his life. Is it possible for that mother to come to the 10th floor of that house, suddenly throw her child down from the terrace and kill him after all that special [music] care she gave to him? [laughter] Holy my dude. What are you on?

[00:21:12]That's an absolutely wild analogy you're building there. And both hilariously and tragically, while you think, "No, why would a parent take care of their child only to hurt them? That doesn't make sense." But unfortunately, that happens all the time, mate. So, of course, we'll completely break the therefore, why would God do all this nice stuff for us if only to let us do the forever dead ridiculous point that you're going for like the dumbass you are? This would be a very unreasonable situation. If she had such an intention, she wouldn't [music] have saved him from the fire and wouldn't have given him so many treats.

[00:21:50]The again unfortunate fact is care and kindness do not negate the possibility of mental illness. The same way that a strict parent who isn't constantly spoiling their child isn't inevitably going to yeet them off a goddamn building. Superficial behavior has absolutely nothing to do with whatever the ultimate result of a situation is going to be. You absolute Is this all just an elaborate way to explain why you are so stupid? overfed with sweeties and then you fell off of a balcony right onto your thick head. It would explain a lot. Bye.

[00:22:29][music] [music] >> [music] [music] [music] >> Heat.