Enlightenment is not about individual liberation or personal gain, but rather the awakening of the one underlying reality that connects all beings; it should be approached as a responsibility to deepen understanding and serve others, rather than as a tool for escapism, narcissism, or claiming special status.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Why Hari Maa Priyanka Doubts on Doctrine Of Enlightenment And Against Cultism? With Tarun Agarwal.Added:
You follow celibacy but you are married too.
After enlightenment, why haven't you gone to the jungles? Uh we hear and read about your psychic powers, transformational healing powers from the Himalayan regions in particular. Why haven't you set up a spiritual shop in the spiritual supermarket? Isn't all this uh contradictory very rare as well? Uh well I remain in within the family uh and I follow I'm following celibacy also. I'm married also.
Let me put this in this way because I feel uh we live in one consciousness. We appear in one consciousness in one reality and there is a huge responsibility on each of us. There is already a big mess and I do not feel in any sense that I need to bring one more life to put that life through this madness.
We need to serve each other by not creating more mess rather having more deeper understanding.
Instead we should find balance between the physical and its subject the deeper reality.
I on a personal level I do not think that in any manner the that this physical reality is the main reality is the absolute reality in any sense.
Physical reality is just an experience of the subject.
I feel there is a mental experiencer in which experiences happens without separation.
We exist within it. The truth is one.
Sat is one.
I am in it like a design on top of the clothes.
I am just an uh appearance not an entity in itself. So whose enlightenment are we talking about? Whose liberation are we talking about? Whose mti moa are we talking about? It is only one reality in my understanding and the design on the fabric cannot be liberated on its own. Same the object cannot be liberated. The object must understand that it's a structure appearing not forever.
Maybe I am just one of the mental files within the one universal self.
I feel enlightenment is slightly narcissistic thing because it is covered up with fantasy, greatness and power. And I see power and greatness, grandness in a different way. I see all these three qualities as a responsibility.
It shouldn't be a tool of escapism in any manner. People love to live in fantasy, greatness and power.
Because people are crazy.
But not all. There are some exceptionist really wonderful um understandable lovely human beings I have come across.
But the ones I'm talking about who live in greatness, craziness, most of the time their actions are very irresponsible, becoming more shallow, more narrow, looking down on others. I watch this uh personally every day and I promise I am surrounded entire day uh by such great people who are puffed up like a popcorn in their greatness having no ethical code and my ethical code uh is a big problem for them. I see enlightenment doctrine or degrees are available or promised.
I doubt that framework. I really doubt.
I do not romanticize the enlightenment doctrine. Moa, MTI, liberation, janut.
These doctrines I do not see in that way. It is symbolic but not reality in itself. It feels like materialistic metaphysical explanation which I do not find reasonable on its own.
Enlightenment should not become a tool for escaping. Rather it should point that world is a one family having geographical diversity and uniqueness. It is not any separate thing. It's a quality of one reality. For me in my point of view, enlightenment is opening towards the awakening and awakening is a long process because it is a one reality. So it's the awakening of that one reality and it can only know know through you and me but that much only it can know as a world.
I do not think it has a proper understanding. It has understanding in segments.
I see my personal experiences and miraculous activities are personal happenings. I don't take them very seriously. I do not get carried away uh taking out my parade in society and start giving people certificate of enlightenment doctrine. Instead, I would say what it shows, enlightenment shows that it can be a rare neuron firing. It can point towards the mystery, pointing towards the shadows.
But more than that, in my framework, I do not think I allow. I use enlightenment for deeper understanding of this world, society, mental disease for some goodness, not for the personal benefit rather than claiming that I am God. It is a little shallow narrow thing for me. My experiences are pointing towards the psyche which says none of it is having standing alone u position and for me God consciousness is transpersonal.
The truth is one. The sat is one.
Related Videos
BSA Goldstar - I gave up! And why animals beat humans!
thebingleywheeler
102 views•2026-05-31
The 'Islamic dilemma': Quran tells Christians to judge by the Gospel
canceledkings
1K views•2026-05-29
Seneca - Escape The Crowd, Find Your Inner Peace!
realfreewisdom
114 views•2026-05-29
Scholar Explains: WHAT IS A GNOSTIC?
fightbackpodcast
965 views•2026-05-31
Fulton Sheen: A Mente Tenta se Manter Jovem para não Sofrer com os Impactos do Tempo
SantoCotidiano-port
673 views•2026-05-29
Why Pure HEDONISM Is IRRATIONAL
qnaline
12K views•2026-05-31
When They Ignore You, Do This Instead | Stoicism
ZenithWisdom-e3k
615 views•2026-05-31
The fourth great humiliation. #jimmycarr #crowdwork #hecklers #standup
jimmycarr
576K views•2026-05-28











