In civil litigation, courts may authorize alternative methods of service such as email when traditional methods fail, and once a court order authorizes electronic service, the act of sending the email constitutes valid service regardless of whether the recipient actually receives or reads it.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
New Motion + Review of the Notes - Ziggy vs 6up
Added:Heat. Heat.
Heat.
Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Heat.
Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Heat.
Heat.
Heat up here.
Heat.
Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Heat. Heat. N.
Hey y'all. Let me know if you can hear me.
Hopefully you can.
Titanium Annie Lena Hol anonymous loud and clear. Good. All right. I'm going to try not to be so hard on the keyboard tonight.
So, this is I guess you could call this part two. I don't know, but I guess that's what you could call it, right?
I'm going to share my screen here. Uh, try and keep these things right down to the point. Mhm.
Let me open this all the way up. Right.
All right.
So, the keyboard I know it's so loud and I type really fast so it's terrible.
Sorry. It's like it's pretty bad. Um, so there's a few things that I want to go over.
Um, today SixUp was I think she was on Granny's panel. I don't know if she went to everybody else's panel. Um I don't know who if she did go anywhere, but the jerks were not the quote unquote friends that watched the trial. Uh that is one thing that we're going to go over because, you know, people are feeling away.
I also want to say this. I did not see six up in my chat yesterday. I had no idea that she was in here. I was mainly reading, so I absolutely never saw her in here. And then I saw that, you know, she went live after that. And that's where this this stuff here comes from.
So, you know, it is public record and, you know, we we are the lawsuit community these days. So, it is what it is. We're reviewing it and we're going over it.
And one thing that I did want to get out there is one, the jerks were not the friends that watched it. And we've seen a couple of people come in and say, "Yeah, we we did watch and we took notes and we, you know, discussed that." It was said again that I I don't want to misquote anybody. So, let me just grab it here because again, I don't want to misquote One second.
One second here.
Here we go with the typing.
It is what it is with the notes. Sorry.
All right, I'm going to play this here and we are sharing a window. I know you're sharing a window.
I know that already.
You guys can probably just hear it yourself, but let's see. Let me know if you can hear this. Okay.
Could you hear that?
jail live review of the notes and Ziggy's behavior in court, including the comments that the judge made. So, I'm not sure what friends got to do with it.
Yeah. Can you hear the Maybe you can't. Hold on.
I think I have to share it in order for you guys to hear it. So, What do you think the judge thought when he heard that my alleged friends were sitting in the courtroom watching this all go down, but I wasn't there?
Think about that for a minute.
There was a reason why I did not acknowledge this on my channel. I was not served.
Holy [ __ ] I spoke to an attorney. An attorney said, "If you're not served, you don't go." I don't know why anybody would mention Pearl. And I certainly hope they've been blocked. Block them right the [ __ ] out of here.
Don't try it, [ __ ] Six is a grown ass woman.
Okay, she hasn't hasn't been here in months. Anyway, so there was that.
Okay, there's that. And then let me go back to Maybe we'll go over that first so we can get that pot out of the way. How about that?
Now, all I did here was organize because the it was taken in a note like a notepad.
um I don't know what the hell you want to call it, a notepad thingy. And for my own brain, I needed it to be organized this way, but exact wording has been preserved. Exact wording. Okay, so we're going to read this. These were the notes that were given.
Ziggy wants a protective order and $10,000 for emotional distress. And you know, so I separated these out by, you know, areas here. I'm a psychopath.
Oh, I might I potentially have mental issues now that I'm looking at this. Do I? I I think I do. All right. Mind your [ __ ] business about what I have. Okay, I did do two of them. Trying to organize them better because I don't like um let me see. Was this the first one or the second one? Exact wording preserved.
Okay, it's right there in front of me because I didn't want any words changed.
I didn't want anything changed at all.
So, I just needed it organized better.
Okay. Plaintiff's demeanor. That was discussed because somebody watched it and they took notes. That somebody was not me. Ziggy is smiling when she enters. Ziggy is beaming when she says, "My husband's a key witness in a highprofile case out of Tennessee." She is smiling now when identifying herself as Ziggy online with a YouTube channel.
She has the saddest, frowniest face I've ever seen occurring regarding her emotional distress. She has a super frowny face regarding her daughter's claims. She has been wildly rocking back and forth the entire time, but right now is hardcore regarding Duke Electric. She appears very irritated regarding the electric disconnection. She has a scrunched up brow watching the presentation. She's very sad looking for most of this part regarding Jim. Saddest face so far regarding reputation torture claims. She's no longer smiling after judges public record ruling now. So for my brain, yes, this worked better for you guys brain. It really might not.
So, let me edit.
Select all.
Edit.
Can I word wrap this? I hope I can wrap.
That's not word wrapped, [ __ ] Oh, this is so difficult to read. I can't do it, [ __ ] I cannot do it.
It's too much. Just so that you know. So maybe I can just show you this so you don't think I'm a complete psycho and for transparency sake.
So you can see these are the notes right here.
So if I edit, select all, format this.
Okay, I guess this is okay. We can do it this way.
My my brain isn't your brain. Okay, so here we go. She starts off. She wants a protective order for $10,000 for emotional distress. She's smiling when she enters. She asked, The judge asked Ziggy for a red receipt when serving by email.
She did, but Ziggy does have a clip of talking about the court date in her video that she's going to show. Judge says he's satisfied service was successful. He has the baiff call for Jennifer Anderson. And Anderson Anderson. Yeah. Ziggy swore to tell the truth. The judge asks what Ziggy wants him to do today. Ziggy says she doesn't know if he could do protective orders in court. Now remember, whoever's taking notes, they're like taking notes. So whatever to keep Six Up from speaking about her online, judge says no. That's not within his power as a small claims judge. They She then says she wants $10,000 for emotional distress and harassment because this has been going on for over four years. Ziggy says the court ordered a protective order for 2 years. The judge said if that was in 2022 and expired. Ziggy says she did not show up. The judge stops her and asks who is she? Judge says Jennifer.
Six up media online. Judge asks how he knows this. Ziggy says because she goes by Ziggy online. She's smiling now and she says she has a YouTube channel that is true crime and she's beaming and says my husband is a key witness in a high-profile case out of Tennessee.
Ziggy said she and Fred got a lot of information on YouTube but this woman has taken things way. The judge cuts her off and asks if Ziggy knows SixUp. Ziggy says no. Judge asks, "How does Ziggy know that it is her putting her fingers on the keyboard?" Ziggy says, "Sixup has talked about the protective order and made it content." Ziggy states that somehow one of her witnesses illegally recorded while judge interrupts her to say he doesn't need her to say what is legal or illegal. He just needs her to tell him the facts. Ziggy interrupts Judge and keeps going. Siggy continues saying, "They recorded it and then they turned on me and she had no idea that they were doing it. They gave it to SixUp and she put it on her channel.
Judge asks from where." She says, "The protective order in the court." Ziggy pulls out a thumb drive and tells the judge she made a presentation and doesn't know if he wants to watch it off of the record. He asks how long it is and she says 20 minutes. Ziggy says it contains all of her evidence. Judge says he's going to put it on a laptop nearby.
He told her once it goes into evidence, it is public record. Ziger Ziggy's presentation is clips of SixUp from her live streams with Ziggy narrating. The first clip of SixUp showing something from the OOP Zoom.
This was 10 months before the order was up according to what we can hear. Ziggy says May of 2023.
Ziggy narrating saying SixUp was doing this stuff on YouTube all throughout the OOP and that SixUp does the stuff every day. We hear SixUp saying she does not live in Ohio. Then Ziggy says, "Sixup is saying this but didn't bother to show up for court." Ziggy plays Sixup showing Ziggy was prescribed Prozac. We hear Sixup saying she redacted everything.
Ziggy says it still has private info and it's a breach of privacy. The judge pauses the presentation and says, "Well, the document was submitted through the court." Ziggy interrupts. The judge says, "Stop, stop, stop." Judge continues to say, "Well, this is public record and you put it out there.
Protective orders are not confidential."
The judge says if she's foolish enough to put that out there without redacting anything, then that's on her. Ziggy says okay and is no longer smiling. Judge says he isn't trying to be mean, but it's foolish if she didn't want the public to have access to it. The presentation is playing again. Ziggy the narrator on so Ziggy not live but Ziggy the narrator is saying that this is one of the scariest threats six up made.
She then says she talks about a missing girl from Tennessee because her husband's a key witness in this case and was used by law enforcement to record.
She then goes on to say SixUp is threatening her and the little girl's name is Summer. The judge pauses the presentation and asks how is this a threat and how the threat is towards Ziggy. Ziggy says because SixUp said Ziggy would be looking over her back for the rest of her life. The judge corrects her and says, "Well, that's not what it says. It's an AI summary saying the speaker says this about a person." Ziggy says, "That's just what the automation puts in there, like how AI adds little comments underneath a video." The judge asks if Summer Wells is the missing child. Then he plays the clip. The judge asks why it's playing so fast. The narrator Ziggy says when six up thinks you no narrator Ziggy says that six up is saying you think you were scared today.
Pause. She was hit by a car clipped by a vehicle. Judge pauses and Ziggy says she was hit by a vehicle that day. Judge says he agrees it's mean-spirited but he's having a hard time finding a threat to her. Playing again. Narrator Ziggy says, "It's February 16th, 2026, and Sixup makes another threat." Sixup says, "Ziggy, I want your [ __ ] head. You hear me?" Judge pauses and repeats what Sixup says. He then asks what Sixup said before that. Ziggy says, "She said, "This is what exposure looks like."
Judge says, "Okay." Do you you interpret that as exposure?
Judge then asks what he's looking at.
Ziggy says, "Sixup somehow got a photo of her vehicle license plate out in public in Tennessee."
Judge asks what it is. It's YT Ziggy.
She says that's her license plate. Judge says YT Ziggy suggests YouTube Siggy, which suggests you want the public to see you. Siggy says, "But," and the judge says, "Hang on, let me finish my question. You're complaining. She's exposing you, but you have a license plate meant to draw people to your channel." Judge tells Ziggy she can't have it both ways, and she doesn't get to pick and choose what part of the public she wants to expose herself to.
Judge agrees. The want to have your head comment is troublesome. Ziggy says she doesn't have the license plate anymore.
Judge replays the head comment.
Judge asks Ziggy where Sixup said this.
Ziggy tells the judge it was on a live stream. He asks if Ziggy was listening to the live and she says no. Judge asks, "Well, how would somebody know who's watching? You can't know." Judge asks, "If she isn't watching, then how did she get it?" Ziggy smiles and says she it always gets back to her and that SixUp has contacted her family as well. The judge interrupts her and asks more questions about YouTube. Ziggy says somebody sent her the clip. Ziggy says it's somebody named Annie. Ziggy says she can't listen to Six Up because it's gross. S the saddest frowny face I've seen occurring. Narrator Ziggy says her ex passed away. He was tracking her vehicle. He died unexpectedly in October of 2022 and she was absolutely devastated. She claimed Sikup Sixup somehow used this opportunity to contact his family and it caused so many more problems that she couldn't even go to the funeral because it was too much of a dup disruption. Ziggy's very sad and looking down for most of this. The narrator says SixUp showed the protective order against Jim. Ziggy didn't know the public could get it. The judge says it's public record and that somebody can go to the clerk's office and ask for it and they pay a dollar a page and then they have it. Judge says if we air our dirty laundry out, everybody gets to see it. Judge says there are narrow exceptions, but it's hard to get in those exceptions and that's why people go to law school for 3 years and have to pass a bar so that they know how to do these things.
Narrator Siggy says, "Sixup is telling people she's a liar. Sixup put out private documents with her personal information in it. Narrator Ziggy says she was already devastated and Sixup was torturing her. So narrator Ziggy, when I say that, that's on the presentation.
She says it really affected her. She's talking about her daughter and how Sixup is playing her Ziggy's video. Judge asks Ziggy if she thought maybe this YouTube thing is not a good thing. Sigy says she has and she's left YouTube and SixUp follows her anyway. Judge stops her and says it was rhetorical.
Ziggy is saying things that she made public in stating six put it out. Ziggy blames Sher for the daughter alcohol info but neglects to say that Ziggy went live and added even more info. Judge pauses and says Ziggy didn't file for her daughter and that her daughter isn't the plaintiff.
Narrator Ziggy says she's playing a clip from March 2026. Sixup says Ziggy's daughter was online worshiping Dildo's super frowny face. Ziggy says she doesn't know where Sixup got that and that her daughter isn't part of her channel at all and her daughter is not on YouTube. Summer of 2025, the Duke Electric narrator Ziggy says, quote, "Somehow Sixup accessed her Duke bill."
Ziggy has been wildly rocking back and forth the entire time, but right now is hardcore. Ziggy says she had no idea how Sixup has her Duke Electric payment history. She says weird emails were sent to Duke Electric saying Ziggy was stealing Electric. She keeps saying SixUp somehow got this info. The judge asked if Fred is the one who passed away because it seems that his name is in the screen cap. Ziggy says Duke Electric sent them this email and it sounds like the email is claiming how Ziggy switched the accounts to Fred's names. Ziggy says she doesn't know that it was SixUp who actually sent the emails. The judge asks if Ziggy was behind in payments over 2,000 and she says yes. Ziggy says she doesn't know how Sixup got that info.
The judge asks if her electric was disconnected and Ziggy says yes and she's appears very irritated.
She keeps saying she doesn't know how Sixup got the information and Ziggy doesn't have screenshots of that claim.
She says she doesn't know. Ziggy says she knows what he's going to say. It's public record. And the judge asks if she owes some amount pay it court ordered. I don't know what that means. Clip of SixUp saying Fred still owes on his interstate compact.
Narrator Ziggy says she hasn't changed her name yet, but her husband is a witness in a high-profile case out of Tennessee, and SixUp is docking doxing his private information and is it's an every thing on SixUp's channel. Ziggy says whatever the private document is she's showing is not for public release.
It's about her window getting busted out. Ziggy claims she put Sixup's name on it because she doesn't have any other enemies. Narrator Ziggy says Sixup went to a website where Ziggy works. Judge says, "Well, that's the internet and it isn't segmented and people can go where they want." Ziggy complains that that's harassment. And the judge tells her Google's a powerful tool. Ziggy says her landlord and her family have been contacted and that Sixup gets people to contact people in real life. Whatever the presentation is showing says, quote, "Too bad we can't email her boss."
Judge says he knows. He understands her argument. Narrator Ziggy is scrolling SixUp's page saying she searched for Ziggy. She says it was about a month ago when she filed. And Ziggy says there's tons more.
Narrator Ziggy says, "People have turned on her and she's lost income. Judge wants to know how much she's made. 2022, 15,000, 2023, 12,000, 2024, 6,000, 2025.
Ziggy claims she doesn't go on much anymore." The judge says maybe people just lost interest. People lose interest and things start to Wayne. And he says it's a difficult call for him to make regarding damages. Ziggy says, "The harassment though." And the judge says, "I know. I know." Narrator Ziggy says, "The emotional distress and anxiety is a lot. It's all the time. She's just trying to show how often."
Narrator Ziggy reads some titles saying, "Scammer, grifter, ruining her reputation. Fred is her husband and mentioned in a lot of the titles." Judge says, "The last one looks nice." It says something like Ziggy's fair and nice.
Ziggy says she thinks that's sarcastic.
Narrator Ziggy says this is almost every freaking night. One of them says Jason joins us. Then states Sixup contacted Jason, her ex. She says Jason came on to expose her. The judge asks if that's the one who died and Ziggy says no. He asks what expose means and she says I don't know. I didn't watch it. Z claims SixUp was talking about how her ex passed away. She has a very scrunched brow watching this presentation.
He asks how they cross paths. Ziggy says she was a mod of hers in 2021 and she says explain that. Ask her if she asks six up to moderate. She said six wanted to go with her to Tennessee. Ziggy didn't know her and didn't even offer to pay for her half. She thinks she just turned on her and started a channel.
Judge says he will take that under advisement. There is a lot to digest and it's going to take a while for him to give his opinion. He is referring to the magistrate and he wants everyone to know it is against the rules to enter a to enter a picture of a courtroom, especially one in session. Take a picture. I don't know. The judge wants to know how the picture came to be.
Ziggy says a couple of her moderators were witnesses on Zoom. They screen recorded it without Ziggy's knowledge.
Ziggy tells the judge it was Elizabeth Schaefer in Pennsylvania and Ziggy thinks her address is on the protective document. She turned on Ziggy and gave it to SixUp. Ziggy is beaming again.
Judge states he will refer it to magistrate and to decide if she wants to do contempt proceedings. saddest frowny face ever. Judge says his earlier comments are not to demean her or to depreciate the seriousness of harm, but he has to follow the law. And a lot of this stuff that she put out there. Some of the comments about her daughter do cause him concern, but this is not on behalf of her daughter, so he has to weigh that in. Judge says he would be concerned, too. Sent her to the other court and told her she can consider hiring an attorney in Ohio to file there as well. Ziggy says Six Up put up cameras and ran out the back door and bragged about it on YouTube.
Judge tells her maybe abstain from social media because it's causing nothing but grief. Ziggy asked the judge if he has Ziggy asked judge if he has the amount because she just left it up to him in the complaint and judge says he appreciates that that and he listed some testimony for damages.
That was a lot. Mine was way more neater. All right, break. My jaw hurts.
Yikes.
Lord have mercy, Jesus. Okay.
Now, let's get to the um the other thing here. All right. Let's get to these loving you.
All right. We're going to look at this really quick. Okay.
Let me close this because I don't think I ever want to look at that again. That was that was that was rough.
Hold up. Wait a minute.
Okay, here we go. This first one, the image shows the header here of her formal motion, which is the motion that was filed yesterday or the day before now. I think it was it was yesterday that it went through, right? Yeah. So, she is talking here. Defendant Jennifer respects respectfully moves this court to set aside the default judgment entered against her pursuant to Indiana trial rule 60B6 on the grounds that the judgment is void for lack of personal jurisdiction, improper service, and violation of defendants constitutional right to due process in support of this motion. Okay.
She is confusing, conflating failed mail service with no service at all.
The court record doesn't track mail. It tracks the court ordered digital alternative service that the judge signed.
Judge signed it. It is 100% valid.
That's it. I don't know how many times to say that. I think that should be understood by now that it's it's valid.
But we're going to read the actual rule.
I'm going to show it to you guys so you can take a screenshot because it is real. It is valid.
I don't know.
The reason the judge would order this is because you are unreachable by regular mail. You're unreachable. That's it.
That's it.
She filed this the day before the hearing. No, she this here was filed yesterday or the day before. Sorry.
The the other motion to dismiss it was filed the day after the hearing. This is what she just filed yesterday.
Okay. It's what she just filed yesterday. Now, we're going to go to the next one.
I mean, she's saying, you know, no valid service was made. It absolutely was. I mean, there's just no two ways around that.
But I understand that she doesn't particularly believe that, which is fine. She doesn't have to, but it is what it is and it was made. So, here's the next one.
this one here.
The email service is invalid.
She's arguing that the Indiana small claims rules do not authorize email service. The trial rules require physical or certified mail and that she's never consented to electronic service.
That's a major error.
Under the recent modernization of Indiana trial rule 4.14, the courts are explicitly permitted to authorize alternative methods such as email, text messages, social media via a special order if traditional message methods are unsuccessful.
So her saying she never consented completely completely misapplies that rule. Consent is required for routine daytoday document drops between lawyers and that's under trial rule five. Totally different than this. It is never required when a judge issues a an order under trial rule 4. It simply is not. It is not. So, I'm going to bring this up so that you guys can see it. Just so that you know what this says here.
Stop sharing. Let's share this one.
Okay, here we go.
This was signed September 9th, 2025 at 4:37 p.m. Indiana Supreme Court order amending rules of trial procedure on January 12, 2021. This court created the Civil Litigation Task Force as part of the Indiana Innovation Initiative to focus on improvements related to civil litigation. We directed the task force to analyze the research research on court reform, assess the impact of innovations and in other states, identify innovative strategies for significantly improving the court process, and provide a written report with findings and recommendations. In that report, the task force recommended the county modify Indiana's rules of trial procedure to follow reforms in other states. Those recommendations include amending our trial rules, too.
Include proportionality as a fundamental principle to limit the availability of discovery. Align the general scope of discovery with the issues in the case rather than its subject matter.
Limit the number of discovery requests and the number and duration of depositions subject to the party's agreement or court approval. Prohibit general objections to discovery and enhance the use of courtappointed neutrals to help manage discovery in appropriate cases. The task force's report also recommended that the court modify our trial rules related to service of process to ensure due process without creating unnecessary cost and delay. Those recommendations included amending our trial rules to permit electronic service of process on registered agents. Allow service by publication in online media in addition to printed newspapers.
Expressly permit alternative methods of service such as email, text messages, and social media direct messages. And clarify service on individuals to the addresses shown on the summons.
The court commends the task force members for this exceptional work. blah blah blah blah blah blah. Okay, the amendments are effective January 1, 2026.
So, these were amended. These were added.
It's right here.
Expressly permit alternative methods.
The minute the judge signs those things, the minute that he signed it, it became the rule. That's it. Okay. I mean, I I don't I'm not sure how else to say that. It's We're I mean, we're we're going hardcore here. We're going to pull up right here.
We're pulling up the Indiana rules.
And this is not to clown somebody. This is not to make somebody feel stupid.
This is to put out the correct information so that we all have the correct information. You can't keep saying that these things are untrue and you're also I don't know where you're getting your advice or information from, but to continue to say the and file motions and and I heard why the motion was filed today. Uh such a bad reason because it does not help, but we'll get to that at the end of this. Um here's rule 414. service under special order of court or rule 4.14.
Upon a verified motion filed by any party setting forth facts sufficient to show that prior attempts to obtain service pursuant to the trial rules have been unsuccessful, such as mail and it all being returned. The court in which any action is pending may make an appropriate order for service in any other manner that is reasonably calculated to give the defendant actual knowledge of the proceedings and an opportunity to be heard. Such other forms of service may include social media, email, and other technology.
There's absolutely nothing here that says you must be notified. Now, you might say, "Well, what about the that other rule there?
Um, rule 86. This is for an established case where you've both already shown up to court. You both have loginins and you're both exchanging discovery and other documents.
in an ongoing case. That's what rule 86 is. Rule 86 does not apply to a civil litigant who is a defendant in a case where they are trying to serve the person noticed to come to the bench trial. That has nothing to do with what this is whatsoever.
I don't know how else you can explain it exactly, but that's what this is for.
It's a very specific reason that this is here.
You It's already existing, an existing case.
Does that hopefully that makes sense to people?
Jason, does the plaintiff send the email and what if they are blocked?
The email is sent electronically.
The email is so here's this summons proof of service returned in amendments.
The person making service shall promptly make his return upon or attach the copy blah blah blah. I think it's in this one. Um it is it is uh since it's all electronic, it's and we went over this yesterday. The way that it exactly works and I let me show you better than I can say it because I don't I don't want to say the wrong words here.
Uh, this is rule 4.4, manner of service.
Okay, that's this one. Let me bring this one over here. 4.4.
Oh, my jaw.
I read way too much. Now my jaw is like, um, [ __ ] Ouch.
Like we were saying yesterday about the um the handshake, you know, that's that's a big part of this that the electronics ensure that there is that handshake and the judge needs to know that.
Additionally, she played something for the judge where she was talking about knowing about it.
Now, I believe she's trying to say that that was regarding the um copyright lawsuit.
I don't know. But whatever she showed him, he said he felt he was confident that the service was complete.
That service went through. And I'm just pulling up cuz I know that we talked about this a bit yesterday as well.
Where in the hell did it go? I have so many damn windows open. Let me actually close all of these downoop before my [ __ ] computer shuts down. I have like 900 trial rules open here to go over. So, I we we don't even need to go over all of those. But, let's get through this part first and then I'll look at the chat again. Um, minimize her case here.
Um, her claim that she never consented misapplies this rule. So we looked at rule number five and it is never required when a judge is issues an order under trial rule four. Okay. Then we have this one number.
Okay.
Once we go over all of these, then it'll be easier for me to focus.
You know me be I'm too many organized. I have to I have issues. I told you. All right.
Plaintiff improperly relied on a separate federal lawsuit to claim service. So, this will go back to what Na was talking about.
plaintiff represented to the court that the defendant had been served because the plaintiff had filed a separate federal copyright infringement lawsuit.
Defendant was served only in that federal case, not in this small claims case. Plaintiff later voluntarily withdrew the federal lawsuit after defendant filed a motion to dismiss and indicated an intent to seek sanctions.
Service in a different lawsuit does not constitute service in this case. Each case requires its own summon and proper service under the Indiana trial rules.
So she knows that plaintiff reliance on service from an unrelated federal case was misleading and resulted in the court proceeding without obtaining personal jurisdiction over the defendant. Okay.
So what she's trying to say is Ziggy notified her of the copyright thing and I think that that would have gone like through YouTube, right? It's a copyright complaint. Then she decided to take it further and then SixUp was going to fight back with it and then she withdrew it because they weren't really going to go to copyright, you know, they weren't going to do any of that. But you know what that proves?
She's saying now though that she then blocked her, but today on Granny's, she said she put her in her spam folder. But the email would not have come, as far as I know, would not have come from Ziggy herself.
It would have had to have gone through potentially.
Let's double check that here. Whoops.
Eight. Now I have too many notes now.
And I need coffee. Mhm.
She was not in person, sir. She did not get sent to the email service. Jam 420 is here. Hey, Kappa.
She contradict. Yeah, that that was a lot today as well. It was. Okay. H So, let's go. a trial 414.
Let's see here. Do they I'm just looking to see if they record it in some way or how is Ziggy giving it to the judge cuz I don't know the answer to that. Is she giving it to the judge like a delivered receipt? And if she had like a delivered receipt on there, then because the way I'm understanding 4.14 is if you're only having to go through the electronic filing service if you are an established case, all that metadata comes in then. But what about when you aren't in an established case yet and it's just Ziggy and Six Up, right? And you keep mailing the stuff to her house and she's not answering, you know, she's sending it back. So now, who sends the email? I would assume because Ziggy's prosay, she's sending the email and it may not be under the electronic system. So, how is it being proven that Ziggy sent the email? Perhaps she showed the judge a print out or in the note section that we read a little while ago, it said that Oh, I closed it. Of course I did. But it did say something about it said something about her talking about it on her channel, but Sixup is saying, well, what I was talking about was not this. What I was talking about actually was the copyright.
Now a lot of people could say a lot of things right now. They could people could say things that you knew.
You know, you knew and that's it's whatever.
If there's no way to prove that you were served, that Ziggy never sent that email.
Zigg, you're going to have to prove that. Sure, you can show your inbox, but your inbox, you can delete anything you want out of your inbox. I don't know how the hell that's going to work. You got the copyright stuff federally. You got that stuff. You're saying after that you quote unquote blocked her, but then today on Granny she said it probably it could have went to spam because you put her in your spam email and you'd have to look in there. I don't know what's true and what's not true at this point, but at the end of the day, your friends knew, right? Your friends knew because they went and they watched and took notes, but you didn't know. You're saying you didn't know, and it's just going to ultimately fall apart. This whole thing is going to fall apart. Unless Ziggy has no proof she ever sent an email if she has zero proof. Zero.
And can't when you say that in court.
Hey, hey Judge. Here's my email. Here's my email box. I never received it.
Never. Never. Never. And Ziggy turns around and says, "Here Judge, this is my phone. Here's my Gmail. Here's when I sent it. you lose again right there.
Done. Now, let's say she pulls it up and she can't show anything and she says, "You know, I may have deleted it, but I can show you where her friends were here if you want to check your Zoom because you have to register like to be on the Zoom. You have to sign in."
If she does that, the judge is going to look at you and say, "Well, that's interesting." But services, it's a legal thing. and you have to be served.
And if Ziggy doesn't have that proof and he accepted her saying six up was served, then I guess she has something, right? I mean, right.
I don't know if the chat agrees with that, but I I would think so.
Well, it is a civil case and they are giving that opportunity. Now, I think service would be more fair not coming from the complaining party's personal email. I mean, I guess I can't tell you how it happened or how it didn't happen. I can't. But I can say that, you know, yeah, she said it was sent to her mothers, her son, this one, that one. I mean, clearly, you know, that these things are Oh, God. It's just too much. There's so many things that have been said that it's it's really like everywhere. It's It's everywhere and it's getting twisted up and it's not good.
Why be so anonymous about the friends?
because I mean there's no reason that anybody needs to know who the friends were. Um some of them have talked about it. I mean there's no harm in that.
Anybody here can can go to a [ __ ] Zoom meeting and watch a court trial.
Never.
Never. I would never try drive to someone else's. It was on Zoom. You could all watch if you chose to, right?
You could I think she's trying to say she wasn't personally served, so it's not considered being served. That would BHB did improper service. Yes. Yep.
Um if we are being honest, plenty of people seen her discussing small claims court. Yeah.
Prior to the trial. Just because they were privated or deleted doesn't mean it didn't happen. Correct.
Correct.
You can't keep saying that it didn't happen when it did. But I mean, I guess you can if you want the judge to restart this whole thing from the beginning, but you need to also realize the only things you can argue after that. Let's say he resets this whole thing because there's no proof that any email ever went out, didn't happen, right? then you can only talk about the talking points that she gave. There are no new talking points, just the one she gave. So, you have to defend yourself against her PowerPoint, whatever it was, whatever that might have been. Okay. Um, if Ziggy hit that send button from her computer, if she hit it, it is classified as service via the court framework. period. End of.
That's just what it is. Once she sent it, it was sent.
Let's see.
Uh, this next one is here.
Number Four.
Four. Right. Yeah.
Number four.
Loading.
Number four. This one here.
So, she's pointing to past legal actions, the protective order case, the federal copyright claim, and it's completely irrelevant to anything.
It's completely irrelevant. Um, and she she's talking about 60B in here.
60B, I think, was at the very top of her complaint.
um a motion to vacate looks only only at the mechanics of the active case. This stuff here doesn't matter. She because you're saying, "Oh, she filed a protection order which was also never served the copyright lawsuit and she withdrew it. She initiated legal actions without proper service, without evidence, without whatever." And then what does I don't know what that has to do with anything because if she was trying to put a protection order on you and she was serving it all over the universe and you that just says that she doesn't have your right address clearly.
That's it clearly.
So I I don't know how that helps anything or doesn't whatever. I mean then the next one is and he's I don't think he'll pay any attention to that because what does that have to do with anything?
This one here is the next one that she had and it is here we go. The court lacked personal jurisdiction because she was never served. So she's going back to the basis of that because I was not served.
The court lacked personal jurisdiction at the time judgment was entered. A judgment entered without jurisdiction is void, not merely voidable. Under trial rule 60B6, avoid judgment must be set aside and there is no time limit for raising this issue, which I mean I guess is fine, but the footprint is going to destroy what you're talking about because if in fact Ziggy did record you talking about small claims court, that is not federal court, that's small claims court. So you you absolutely did speak about her presentation.
You knew the days up and to leading up to you knew because you talk about watching her get prepared. You discuss that You know, one thing uh one thing that Pixie says, don't play in my face.
And again, it is this just is what it is. I don't know what the [ __ ] you want me to say. Um I don't I'm not going to keep explaining the fact that you definitely said what you said. Um, oh, you removed them. You see, you're playing too much. You're playing too much. And I know that you do not have uh a preservation order, which is totally fine. You don't have one, but you removed them. You see? I mean, it's it's a little wild like that. sure you're doing these things and I I mean I get why you're doing it, I suppose, but they're gone. They were right in here.
Right there. Here. Right there. Now they're not.
Okay. Fair. That's fair, I suppose.
Right.
Let's look then girl.
I don't know.
Let's not this is going to become a thing.
These This is what I'm talking about.
You know what I'm talking about, right?
these here.
Let me show you this one.
>> So, I've actually tried What what was Ziggy preparing and when?
What part two will be about where we will pick up is Ziggy um submitting her 20 minute presentation that she worked on for the court. Now, we knew that she did because she had mentioned it the days before, days leading up. All her time, all her time.
>> H we knew. We knew that she worked on for the court. Now, we knew that she did because she had mentioned it the days before, days leading up. All her time. All her time.
>> The days before, the days leading up.
I mean, I don't need to say any more than that. So, and the thing is is that you're saying, "Well, I didn't know, but my so-called friends knew. My so-called friends knew."
That's not cool, bro. H I don't know. I don't know what to say about that.
That's not my business. I'm nobody's mouthpiece. I'm just saying, you know, if it was anybody else, you'd be tearing them a new ass. So, there's that. Uh this next one is number six.
This here tonight to process Six up. I don't know, girl.
I'd want do process, too. Of course. The [ __ ] Of course. But I don't know. The 14th Amendment, Article 1, Section 12, a judgment entered in violation of due process, which again goes back to her being served and her saying she had absolutely no notice of. She didn't know anything about this. This was a shock. She had no idea. And then she found out from the friends and then she had to quickly call the clerk. And then the clerk helped and did the things. Okay. I mean, all right.
That's what happened.
Then the last one here is this one where relief requested. Set aside the default judgment as void under trial rule 60B6.
vacate any resulting orders, garnishments, or collection actions.
Reset the matter for hearing so the defendant may respond. Consider whether the plaintiff's repeated filings warrant caution or sanctions and grant all other just and proper relief.
So, I mean, that's what she wants. Um, and I mean it could could it happen? I mean, I guess yeah, it it could happen.
Is it likely to happen? I don't know. Um I don't know. July 14th, you know, in the in a normal trial, like the bench trial that happened, the plaintiff has to prove their case on July 14th, everything is like totally reversed.
Ziggy's already proven her case. Now, Sixup bears 100% of the burden to prove hers. And under trial rule 60B, even if she manages to convince the judge that her absence was like a total mistake, excusable neglect, the the rule dictates she must claim her defense right then and there.
She has to be ready. You can't just say, "Oh, you know, I want to reset and all of that." It, you know, you need to be ready to get this whole thing done. Now, here we can see, get that out of there.
Here, let me just refresh this page.
Let's share this.
Me unshare that and show this. Okay.
What are you doing over there, Brady?
Making all kinds of noise, sir.
Let's just see if we missed anything here.
The court has jurisdiction over the defendant.
What she said is that they don't they don't have any jurisdiction over her.
The venue it goes over that.
And it says here, small claims proceedings is not governed by this trial rule, but by Indiana small claims rule number 12, fail your state of claim standing defamation.
I mean, all of these things have already gone on. Um, he's addressed all of these things. How are you? That's I guess that's what I'm wondering. How are you going to prove you weren't served?
How like what is the look at my email from Ziggy? Oh, okay.
Let me see here. Boop. I swear to God if if Ziggy sends me an email that says [ __ ] this.
I'm just going to fall out. I swear.
Let's see.
I don't see no email from Ziggy. Y'all be lying, bro. You're lying.
What' you lying for? Where the hell did she send it?
Huh?
Let me see. Maybe it doesn't say a Ziggy.
No.
Let me go down and read here. Hold on.
She emailed me where it's Am I in the right email? Chasing truth to Gmail. Oh, maybe she had my old email. No, no, she does not. This is my email right here.
That's a door. Maybe it's on your front.
Oh, check spam. That's a good idea.
There you go.
Oh, man. Not good, bro.
Let me just read this really quickly.
Nice.
Okay.
Okay.
Do you I don't know if she's still in here. Do you have the email that you sent that proves you are, you know, whatever that you did all of this. I have no idea.
But if you don't mind, I don't know if she wants me to read this or not. Can I read it or no? Hey, new member Marina just popped up there. I'm in um one of those programs so I don't know. She might think she is an but I don't know what a sovereign citizen. I can't stand you.
Where's Daryl Brooks? I love him. Same age. He really was my favorite Daryl Brooks. He was absolutely bonkers. No, you guys know the issues I've always had with my emails. They always go to [ __ ] spam. It's actually sad.
And I don't know why I hate that.
Let me put her in my Can I Can I move you?
13 minutes ago, she sent it. Okay. I mean, she Let's see.
I see it here. Yeah. All right. I'm just going to read this. Maybe I'm not going to show it. I have it. Luminous. Yes, I do.
I don't know if she wants me to show it.
So, I'm not going to show it unless she comes in here and says show it, but in anyway. Oh, please read it. Okay.
comes now the plaintiff Adriana Amiss prosay and respectfully submits this response in opposition to the defendant's motion to set aside the default judgment filed on June 18th 2026 for the reasons set forth below the plaintiff respectfully request that this court deny the defendant's motion here we go number one proper service was effectuated via court order. The defendant claims the judgment is void due to lack of service. This claim is without merit. On April 28th, 2026, this court issued an order explicitly authorizing service via email. The plaintiff complied with this order by serving the defendant via email at the address provided to the court. The defendant has acknowledged the timeline of these filings in her public statements, noting that the motion for an order granting alternative service was filed on the 28th and that the court order authorizing email service was signed and issued in relation to that date. Timestamp 2 hours 2143 seconds to 2 hours and 2 minutes and 7 seconds.
Therefore, the plaintiff satisfied the court's requirements for service and the court possessed personal jurisdiction at the time the judgment was entered. Okay.
So, maybe you sent the them a link there. Um, I don't have the link, but maybe you sent a link of that timestamp that you're talking about.
Hey, buddy. What's up?
>> Okay. Love you.
Let's see.
I'm going to bring you guys up on YouTube so that I can see this because I can't really see all of my comments in here.
I hate when this happens. I'm sorry.
View channel. Let me myself. Hate that.
Top chat. live chat. Thank you, Lena. I appreciate that. All right. Is Ziggy still here?
Let me see what she says.
Ziggy, did you um So, yeah, the timestamps are her first.
I gotcha. Okay. The 7500 reasons video from June. Gotcha. From just now.
Gotcha. Gotcha.
And I'm I I'm sure you've clipped that and already sent it over to do all the things. Do you also have the email thing?
Thank you, Pamela. Do you have the email um like that you sent the email, Ziggy?
Do you have that? You do.
There you go. Well, if you do, you do.
[ __ ] I mean, what can you do after that? if you have that and you've sent that already.
Or maybe she's saying yes, she submitted the clip to the court. I don't know.
I don't know what she's saying. Well, maybe hold on. Copy. I don't know if you'll be able to click this, Ziggy, but if you can click it and it works, maybe you can come up here for a sec cuz there's always a delay in the [ __ ] chat and um that might be helpful. Yes, it's in my scent box.
Well, then that's it. There you go.
Because that's all you needed to do. So, there's that. Okay. All right. I'm going to share this. Now that you've answered that, you're I mean, you don't have to if you don't want to. So, everybody knows Ziggy and I have a little bit of history. I don't understand, but you know, she's good enough to come in and say, "Hey, you know, here's what happened." Okay. So, here we go with this. All right.
Comes now. the plaintiff proper service was effectuated via court order. So there's all of that. She says it's 2011 to 2012, which is Oh, boy. She probably already took that down, too. I don't know.
No. All right. 2011.
I see you.
The defendant have been un unsuccessful.
Is therefore ordered that the plaintiff be authorized to serve the defendant by the following methods.
Okay. I never received an email with any service after the 28th.
Also, I have to agree to be served by email. No, >> I have to also like be there and say that's okay to be agree to that.
Um I was not notified of any of this.
So, uh the bench trial was held on 519.
>> All right.
>> Hey, Ziggy, can you hear me?
>> Yeah. So, I don't want to stay up too long because I really am trying to stay off YouTube, but I just turned >> I did want to clear up like a couple of things like that you were asking about and stuff because I thought it was important.
>> Um, bullshy.
>> Yeah, the court did just the court did order alternative service and allow me to um serve her by email. Even before it was accepted by the court, I had already emailed it to her. So, I had I sent it to her on two dates. May 18th and uh let's see, was it May? Yeah, May 18th and May 30th are the two dates. And I attached them as exhibits um to the court, the sent emails, the receipts of them being sent on the 18th and the 30th, which she would have known if she would have showed up. And um let's see what else were you asking about?
>> Um I was asking what the dates were. I had you I couldn't personally hear you, but the chat could. What days did you send?
>> Um May 18th and May 30th.
>> May 18th and May. So, so I actually had sent her uh um her it by email even before it was approved by the court too.
So the May 18th was before it was approved by the court and then the May 30th I sent again and I attached both as exhibits to um I I attached it in evidence to the court um with service of the sent emails which I could show you. I mean gosh I could send it to you. It's not that big a deal.
No, I mean I sent it I I sent him she's just and also I was awarded by the court uh a protective order for two years too by a different judge >> um that she avoided service by and would run out.
>> So that is a whole different situation that she wanted to play games with service. This is just her mo. I mean everybody could see that.
>> I just wanted to clarify one thing. So, the order was granted on Well, okay. You filed the motion on April 28th for alternative service. It was approved on April 29th.
>> And when was the first, February, March, April, May? I think it was May. Maybe I'm Maybe it was uh Maybe it was April 30th that I Maybe it was April 30th because I would have probably sent it to her right after. Let me go look.
>> Yeah. Yeah.
>> Let me go look on my emails and see exactly just for sure.
>> I'm assuming it was April. It had to be April 30th and not May 30th because your trial was May 19th.
>> Oh, d Okay. Yeah. Sorry.
>> Yeah. Honestly, I would have like I just wanted her to leave me alone. That was the whole goal the whole time. And that's why I dropped the copyright infringement. The real truth behind that too is I dropped that because I filed that first and I didn't have the small claims filed at that time when I filed that and it was it was done after. And then I thought, well, you know, I have never sued anybody. I've never gone through something like this. So, I thought, well, I could just ask the court when I'm in there for small claims. Um, I could just have them do everything. Have them give me an injunction so to get her to not speak on me, a protective order.
>> You know, I didn't care about the monetary. It wasn't anything about that.
But um so I was like I might as well I there's no reason to have both of these uh lawsuits when the main goal is just to get her to leave me alone. So I mean the copyright infringement I just thought was kind of like the more petty of the two. So I just let it go. I didn't I was already stressed. I'm filing everything for myself and doing it all on my own. Mhm.
>> Um, so yeah, I just it was just to lower I didn't think it both of them were necessary at the time.
>> At that time. Yeah.
>> Saying she did not get the email sent after April 28th.
>> Oh, yeah. And that's what was I was going to check with that. Uh, okay.
Yeah, here it is. April 30th. Yeah, here it is. Right here.
>> April 30th.
>> I could send you a screenshot here.
>> That'd be great if you could. Yeah.
>> Yeah.
>> And it doesn't matter if it was received. It just matters that it was sent that it's in your sent box.
>> Let's see.
It might come from a different email, but you'll probably get it better because it's from a Gmail address instead of a >> That's fine >> because those Outlook emails like for some reason my email gets like filtered a lot of times a lot easier than other emails. So, it's chasing truth2gmail.com, right?
>> Yeah. Yep.
>> Okay.
>> I'm getting hiccups.
>> And you know what? I would have I would have literally dropped everything if she would have just left. If she could just be a normal person, I seriously truly would. But she can't be like normal. She can't. She's been and I only did this because I felt like I'm pushed in a corner like she's been obsessive and it's got so ridiculous that I just um had to go real life in response is how I look at it. I asked her to stop. I've been asking her for years to stop and it's it's not it's normal. Everybody everybody does content stuff, but there's a line, you know, and um I'm not just I'm not picking on her.
There's a reason why um I was awarded a protective order by a judge. And also, I want to say too that this was not this whole by default too.
I don't know where she got by default because the the judge took everything under advisement and under evidentiary he did an evident an evidentiary hearing.
>> So there's no by default here. He actually came up with the amount himself. I didn't give any amount that I was asking.
>> I asked the judge to do at his discretion what he thought because what I wanted was her to leave me alone. That was the goal of it. I we do need to to to to pause and say it if it was by default then what would have happened was he would have he could have gave you $1. You know he could have said >> yes I believe this um blah blah blah but because he did the award and he laid it out that isn't my default.
>> Yeah. And so I don't know where she got the default when she put in her response like she it's almost like it's for show to make it for YouTube or something cuz she's trying to make it seem like she you know oh oh I just won by default cuz because she didn't show show up. know like they he the judge was pretty tough and he is big on free speech like he was you know and public information like and I knew it was going to be a very hard battle to prove my case for something that's online but I also knew what I'm the one that lives this every day I've been the one the focus of her you know her focus for so long and live it I there's Oh my gosh, there's just so much. It's it's it's I don't I I'm not picking on her is basically what I'm trying to say, >> right?
>> I feel bad that she I feel bad for her, honestly. I feel bad that she's her own worst enemy and she uh just harms herself in a bit. But >> I mean it's it's a rough situation um >> right now especially because >> emotions are high and now there's another motion to vacate it. So I mean I guess we're going to see what happens but if once it left your scent box because he signed that that's it. I mean I don't know what else I don't know where it could have >> Yeah. Did you get my email?
um probably went to spam.
>> I I sent you uh it's from uh my Adrian amusgmail.com email and um it's just a screenshot of my sent box and that that email is there. I don't know what other emails were there. I didn't even pay attention, but I'm sure there's nothing that I need to worry about, but just pay I mean if you put it up, we'll just watch and see what >> Yeah, I don't see it yet. It's not in.
And it it's chasing.
>> Oh [ __ ] Oh, wait. Hold on. I don't It doesn't look like it did send.
I took a screenshot.
>> Are you on your phone?
>> Yeah, I was trying to send you a screenshot on my scent box of where >> uh you could see. Okay, here. Let me um Okay. Actually, I'll get a screenshot where you can see both because like I use this email. So like not very much that there's only like both emails you could see in the sent box in one screenshot. You know what I mean?
>> And so you could see the one on April 18th where I sent that to to her Yeah. I sent her and then I also sent her okay the one on May or April 30th. And you know, chat, you can love Ziggy, you can love Six Up, you can hate both of them, you can hate me. Doesn't matter. This is about >> Yeah, we're just talking about this one topic here. Just this one topic here.
>> It's not time to argue all the other million things that have ever happened because Ziggy went in with her PowerPoint, whatever it was, presentation. She presented it and won.
I mean that really is it at the end of the day except for this one matter and if she shows that her scent box shows this that's it. I don't know how else to >> and oh also that's another thing I want to add in too that people don't know like unless like I don't know um and the judge also heard out of her own mouth because in the presentation I made it was like a 20 minute video he played in court and I showed just you know a bunch of it was just a video I did it wasn't you know just different things in it and in it one of the very first things, one of the very first clips is her talking about my daughter saying and and and talking about the defamation lawsuit, upcoming defamation lawsuit. So, the judge has already heard her speak on it like before the, you know, like in video like before the court date even happened. So there's proof, absolute proof that she knew about it.
>> And she put in this court filing that she which is perjury and could I would I think contempt she's lying. She put in the response that she did not know about the court date. Like she's trying to act completely just like she did not know. She put that in her uh filing. She just um she just like that. I think you were just reading earlier.
>> Yeah, >> the one I just responded to. Um, and >> I mean, you know, not you. Listen, I'm sorry. Um, >> you know what? She could have gone into that court and said, um, I watched SixUp um, you know, kick a cat in the face and call the cat my daughter's name. And the fact of the matter is if SixUp wasn't there to defend herself, then the judge can only base it on what the judge is hearing. So it doesn't we can say a million times, well, you went in there and you lied and you didn't say this and you did not say that and Ziggy should have never done this because Ziggy's exploited and she said that.
>> Whatever. It does not matter. The at the end of the day, here's what was given to the judge. The judge had to look at it, evaluate it, and use the law to make his decision. That's what he did.
>> Now, all of that aside, they changed the laws at the end of 2025 to be more modern. They changed them so that you could have electronic service.
And the only thing that Ziggy had to do was notify her electronically. As you see April 18th, April 21st, April 21st, April 30th, those are you can see judge approved alternative service. Judge approved alternative service.
That tells you right there.
Right there.
>> I mean, what I don't know what else to say to that except for the fact that it went through and it's there. Yeah. And I think that I probably I'm just I'm going to get off here, I think, because I probably just, you know, stay quiet for since there is like proceedings and stuff still ongoing. Um, but I did want I mean I think the little this little bit that we've talked about I think's fine or whatever. I mean, unless there's anything else you want to ask.
>> No, I mean that's >> but I'm pretty much going to stay out of it. You know what I'm saying? Like I've been trying to stay away from YouTube and I'm going to continue that. Just I've been living trying to focus on my life, but honestly six scares me. Um honestly she's too obsessive and it just it freaks me out and I just want her to leave me alone. That's it. So, but anyways, I appreciate you trying to listen to this fairly and I do appreciate to everybody who's been trying to really listen to it fairly.
even if you don't like me or whatever, that is commendable and I appreciate that. So, it says a lot.
>> So, I appreciate that. Thank you so much, guys.
>> All right.
>> All right. Talk to you later. Bye.
>> Bye.
>> All right. So, there's that. No, I was saying, you know, people are saying, "Oh, summer was mentioned and all of that." I understand. I understand. There are a lot of people who are very sensitive about that including myself.
But the only things that we were trying to talk about was the fact of the case, right? We can have a a porch stream, you know, and we can talk about all the things, but what I was trying to do was keep it as factual as we could.
I mean, I understand that there are people here who absolutely hate Ziggy.
There are people here who absolutely hate SixUp, but there are also people here who care about both of them, and that's fine, too. I'm here to look at the law. SixUp and I have always gotten along for the most part. We've had some minor issues.
Uh it's rare for Ziggy and I to ever get along. So, just keep that in mind, right? I get it. I understand.
But the only reasons I wanted to do this is because of the case stuff. That's it.
All right. Ziggy says the defendant, this is her response to the final motion that was just made, the one that that SixUp made. And I did highlight SixUp's comments in here to be fair.
The defendant had quote unquote actual notice of the proceedings. Even if the defendant contests the technicalities of service, the law prioritizes actual notice. The defendant was fully aware of the lawsuit and the hearing date. This is ev this is evidenced by the following. The defendant's own filings.
The defendant filed a motion to dismiss on May 20th, the day immediately following the bench trial. This proves the defendant had knowledge of the case and the judgment before she filed her motion. public admission of knowledge and service. In a public video broadcast on June 18th, 2026, Jennifer notes that she's received accounts from people who were present in the courtroom claiming that the judge made statements regarding the plaintiff's child and the scope of the litigation during the proceedings.
She gives her timestamps. She says she had to give all of this information to the judge. She made her screen things and all of that. The defendant admits to receiving the email service for the C court case. The defendant's own words confirm she was not surprised by the lawsuit. She was actively monitoring the docket and received the electronic notification.
The defendant claims excusable neglect as a basis for relief. However, the record demonstrates that the defendant's failure to appear was a tactical choice rather than an accident. As documented in her own public statements, the defendant consulted with counsel and made a deliberate decision not to attend the hearing based on her belief that the service was improper. Specifically, she referenced advice from attorneys on three separate occasions. At 5706, she states, "I was told by an attorney, until you are legally served, you do not go to that court."
At 1 hour and 30 and 36 seconds, she mentioned speaking to two attorneys who both advised her not to attend the hearing in a state where she does not reside, for which she was not served at 218 and 56 seconds. She references advice from an attorney licensed in Ohio, Kentucky, and Indiana who told her not to attend because the hearing could not proceed without proper service.
A party cannot knowingly ignore a court proceeding based on a strategic interpretation of service rules, then claim excusable neglect after an unfavorable judgment is entered.
Conclusion: The defendant's motion is an attempt to relitigate issues that were addressed by the court's previous orders. The defendant had proper notice of this action, had actual knowledge of the proceedings, and chose not to appear. the judgment is valid and should not be set aside. Wherefore, plaintiff, etc., etc., etc. Okay, there's that and that screen share. And I mean, I don't know. It's I mean, it's clearly very very very clearly right here. What else can we say about it? I don't know.
Not a lot. It's right there.
You are being sued. Attached is a pending small claims.
I mean right there. Notice of harassment. Okay.
Then she sent herself this and this like maybe to keep them uh to she sent these to herself. She sent this on April 18th. The day that that was approved, she sent it. And then the judge approved alternative service.
Attached is the complaint. Both sent.
Both sent.
That's it. It's very straightforward. I mean, it is I don't know.
Anybody else see anything that's uh crazy or no?
Now we can look at the [ __ ] Let's see here.
She was after money from a broke [ __ ] Not buying that. Six of said she'd never pay. Doesn't matter. Never pay. If you're making money, you're going to pay. You understand? I mean, yeah. I don't know.
what people think this is.
No, hold on.
He did an excellent job.
Ziggy wasn't screaming as usual.
She was legally served.
Ignorance of the law is not a defense.
What the hell is that? What was that? I don't know.
Ziggy.
No. Was given her by somebody who just like Ziki. I'll behave instead of my hands. Uh. O. I do understand. I don't know what was happening here. Uh, sounds straightforward to me. Chase saying she didn't want to. She didn't want to by default for not showing up. Sigy would have won regardless. I think she would have won that part. Just Samantha. I agree with that as well. I cringe looking back. Amy, I think six sees that at least on she said she [ __ ] up.
Um, I just wanted to be sure that I did highlight SixUps comments that were on the screen.
Um, the link was in the chat. I, you know, I would not have put them up here together under any circumstances.
Uh, I tried to listen to all sides because I think it's important. I don't like you, my concern comments. I can't stand y'all. Cannot.
You know, I got to worry about your ass.
So, I don't know. Uh why that girl? I don't know what's going on there. That's a whole side combo. Okay. Siggy's past for being none of that applies. Melissa, Melissa, please say it again. And I I get it. I do. I totally do. How many time I mean I've gone live talking crazy about Ziggy many a time. But none of that matters when it's about this kind of stuff. Do you understand? Like it doesn't matter. The legal the the law is there. We've gone over the law. We've gone over the rule. We've gone over the ruling. We just went over sixups motion, the reasons she provided and their real reasons to her. However, the only thing we really needed to know was whether or not this was sent. And it was.
It was.
That's it.
No, it's about this chasing. I just think AI shouldn't be used instead. No.
Yeah. No. AI shouldn't be used to do the research. What?
Okay. I return to a voice chat for this combo. Coming in the public is wow. This book people talking about stuff that has nothing to do with the case. It is it it gets really crazy. And no, the court doesn't care about your feelings. The court doesn't care about what Siggy did. The court doesn't care what's accepted. The court cares about the facts and what they can prove and that's it. And he told Ziggy, "Hey, you put this out there. You did that. That's why she was able to use it. She put it out. You put it out these things out here." But then he looked at the big picture of everything. You know, they have to do their due diligence. He told her in the notes, the notes, we went over the notes that were taken and passed on and he says, "I will take all of this under advisement." And of course they do. Do you think that they just like write all this down or do make whatever [ __ ] notes and then it just sits on a desk for a couple weeks until he's like, "Oh, let me go look at that now." No. No.
You have to do some due diligence.
Canvas and Crime has an announcement.
What it is.
What it is.
Yeah. They take the That's what I I'm trying to do is take the emotion out of it. Doesn't matter who I like or who I don't like. Who gives a [ __ ] Has nothing to do with anything. And I hate that around here that matters more. Who you like and who you don't like. It's just crazy.
You did not.
How dare you, [ __ ] I'm going to do that tomorrow.
I am. I'm going to do it tomorrow.
Maybe. Maybe I will. Probably not, though.
See, there are some people they're like, "I'm so happy for Ziggy." I'm not happy for Ziggy. I hate Ziggy. I like Ziggy. I don't like her. Blah blah blah. All right, Dana Skully.
>> What? Babe, >> what?
>> I got to go help my dog. Something's going on with him. Okay. I love you all.
>> It's been real. Bye.
Love you. Bye.
Love you. All right.
Related Videos
JAMIA BA LLB 2026 Offline Mock Interview | Final Interview Round Preparation
MLSLAWACADEMY
104 views•2026-06-16
6/15/26 Lively v. Wayfarer - Full Settlement Agreement is now public
littlegirlattorney
11K views•2026-06-15
HOA Demolished My Yacht for “Unauthorized Docking” — Too Bad I Own the Entire Marina!
Pro-RevengeStories
423 views•2026-06-15
JACKSON KIHARA'S SECRET DEAL: The Deal That Brought Out Jackson Kihara From Jail | LifeLens TV
LifeLens254
5K views•2026-06-14
Guelph's New Renoviction By-Law Explained.
CallCodyRE
807 views•2026-06-14
SCOTUS Rules 9-0 on Gun Rights for Marijuana Users
TheReloadSite
164 views•2026-06-18
A Family Tradition of Federal Time
LoneWolfUsul
603 views•2026-06-14
YouTuber Alexander Zabel Jr arrested again near Nancy Guthrie’s home amid investigation disruption
StarBuzzHD
136 views•2026-06-15











