Race is a fictional social construct that appears real but has no basis in actual nationality, ancestry, or national sovereignty. The racial classification system originated from France Bernier's 'New Division of the Earth' in 1684, which was patterned after the Indian cast system, and was later expanded by Carl Linnaeus in 1758 and Johan Fred Bumbach in 1795. The term 'Caucasian' was artificially associated with 'white' by Kristoff Minor in 1785, despite originally referring to an ethnic group from the Caucasus Mountains. This fictional paradigm has been maintained through legislation, including the 1790 U.S. Nationalization Act and Supreme Court cases like United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind (1923), which used the 'common understanding' approach to determine citizenship. Terms like 'African-American' and 'white' do not identify any national sovereignty, ancestry, or civil political polity, making them fictional constructs that strip people of their original nationality and cultural identity.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Moorish Mondays, 7pmESTAdded:
Heat. Heat.
putting out a call to the warrior in you, to the healer in you, the king, the queen, the magician, the lover in you.
Every single day, we are called to walk in our purpose. Answer the call. Lay down your burden and anything that holds you back and take your rightful place.
The battle is everywhere. It's right in your face. Let's go.
Magnets, crystals, pyramids, magnets, crystals, pyramids, magnets, crystals, pyramids.
Welcome to magnets, crystals, and pyramids.
Success is your destiny.
Welcome everyone. Welcome to Mo Monday with Abdullah Il Mosi Bay.
Yes, no guest tonight. I will be I'll be teaching tonight and uh we got I have a very thoughtprovoking topic for you uh this this evening.
Uh before we get to it, let people know that we are live and well. we are on.
Share it. Share the link to your various social media platforms.
Um, hit that subscribe button if you haven't done so already. Hit that notification bell and um, if you like what you hear, you know, hit that like button, you know. So, this is uh, two.
I've been doing this platform MOS Monday for two and a half years. I've had over 40 guests uh since December of 2023.
So, I'm very proud of that. Uh tonight's uh topic is the the the fictional race paradigm.
The the the the original the the fictional world appearing to be real. The fictional world appearing to be real. the racial racial of nationalities and cultural identities through the artificial racial categories of white, black, brown, red, and yellow. So, we're going to dive right into it.
Se several years ago, I was substituting in the Kansas City public schools and I was uh actually uh talking it was during my during my lunch break and I actually was talking to uh I was in the teachers lounge and it was about good 10 teachers that I was talking to about nationality, the principles of nationality and that nationality ity is not people are not identified by shades and colors but but are identified by nationalities.
So one of the teachers blurted out and say said nationality is not the real world.
So I turned cuz I was speaking to 10 all 10 teachers in the teachers at the time.
So I turned my body, turned my chair to face her and said that nationality is the real world. You have German, Germany, China, Chinese, France, French.
So in chapter 11 of Morris and Main Street part two, I had the subtitle nationality is the real world or nationality is not the real world.
National and that's the statement that came from one of the teachers.
Nationality is not the real world. Now, why would someone say that nationality is not the real world?
What would what would be someone's thought process to make a such a statement that nationality is not the real world now? And I had had never thought about why she had made such a statement only that she made this and made the statement.
Now keep in mind that this fictional this fictional world of race is bombarded. We have been indoctrinated into this black white brown people black people white people and it's and it's so this and you see it on applicate job applications you know uh hospital records uh registration forms school documents and you you this black white this race so the word nationality doesn't appear on documents that you see.
So the the so the concept her concept that nationality is not the real world though it is the real world but that she doesn't see in her experience dealing with our people who were classified as black negleed that how it can be the real world.
Now she would have never said that to Chinese.
So there is some consciousness. Now she was not without consciousness cuz she would have never said to Chinese that nationality is not the real world.
And keep in mind the only the only ones that were in the teachers lounge were Moors classified as nickel color black.
There were no Nigerians. There were no Chinese teachers.
There were no Mexican teachers. There were no Puerto Rican teachers. There were they were all the the teachers that at the time that the statement was made that the nationality is not the real world only more classified as negro colored black and African-American was in the class and was in the teachers at the time. That's important for me to tell you that cuz I don't think she would have said that if a Nigerian teacher was there. If a Mexican teacher was there or Colombian teacher was there or a Dominican teacher was there or a Chinese teacher was there, I don't think she would have made that statement.
I really do not think she would have made that statement that nationality is not the real world.
She only made that statement among, you know, those who she knew would not be offended, you know, cuz we don't that nationality is not part of our discussions in our communities. It's race. What color are you?
Black or white? We got APB.
What do you look like? Black or white?
What are you?
Black or white?
What are you? Black? What are you?
White?
That's all you hear.
That's race. White supremist. White supremacy. Donald Trump's a white man.
White people. Black people.
brown people. So there's no but this is a this is a a indoctrination.
So this fictional world has been made to appears to be real. It could never be real.
white peoples, black people, brown people.
That's not real.
That's only in a fictional world.
So let's look at just imagine that I am Walt Disney and I as Walt Disney Walt Disney created you know Mickey Mouse you know um Minnie Daffy Duck.
So Mickey Mouse created the Walt Disney created multiple characters and these characters are fictional.
So I So just imagine that I am Walt Disney and I'm creating these fictional characters, black, white, red, brown, and yellow.
These are fictional characters living operating in a fictional world that appears to be real.
It's in legislation.
It's on job applications.
It's on census.
It's under race and ethnic standards for federal statistics administrative reporting.
It's used in job forms used to for to to to uh determine how many workers or students a school has.
So it it appears to be real.
It's used all the time.
It's used in schools and it's used in hospitals and it's used for employment for registration and it why does it's not fictional? What are you talking about Abdullah? This is real.
This black white it's real. Donald Trump is a white man.
What are you talking about? Donald Trump is German and Scottish.
Donald Trump is white.
Why you saying Donald Trump is Scottish and German descent?
Look at him. Dummy Abdullah.
Dummy Abdullah. Look at him. Look at him. See that the conditioning.
So we got we have this this deep rooted conditioning this stripping of a people's nationality and culture identity that's been what? It's been over 200 years.
It's not one year, 5, 10, or 50.
You're talking about over 200 years.
Now this racial paradigm was threat over 300 years ago almost 350 years ago with France Ber 1684 new division of the earth but our being stripped of our nationality and culture identity and the knowledge of who we are has been over 200 years you're looking at about 16 generations it's been passed now.
So, it's just that there's no thinking.
It's it's it's programming.
So, there's no critical thinking about it. It's it's programming. What What color are you? What do you look like?
Black or white? That's not thinking.
That's programming.
There's no there there's there there is so there there is no consequences.
connection.
So, let's so let's look at this this framework here. And as I as I'm going along, type your questions in. Don't wait. You don't have to wait till the end cuz I'll I'll look at the um the comment section periodically.
So, if you have a question, right, if you have a question or comment, type it in the comment section cuz I'll look at the I'll look at it periodically.
I don't see anything right now. Let me see.
Oh, we have sister Annia on.
We have is that Andre?
Right. Peace both of you.
All right. So, I'll continue here.
Let's look at this. I'm going to go to a case then versus the United States.
T I N D versus the United States.
This is United States versus Beak Shin thin and the last name once again is spelled T H I N D 1923.
The end was considered a Caucasian by some scientific definitions.
The court ruled that the term white person should be interpreted based on the common man's understanding.
The court found that because Hendis were not perceived as white by the general population, they were ineligible for naturalization.
So this common man's understanding or or common understanding approach.
And this is a United States Supreme Court case.
And between 1870 and 1952, 52 cases were decided by the United States Supreme Court where they used whereby the common understanding approach was used to determine citizenship then to deny citizenship.
ship to Japanese, to Chinese, to the Hindus based on they were night based on the common understanding, approach and meaning of white.
So let's let's look at the where did this come from this this paradigm.
Oh, so we have I'm going to stop it. Let me see. We have Oh, we got some more.
Great.
The grand their grandmothers are not from this land.
I don't know what that means. I mean reference to Don P. Peace brother Abdullah that grandmas are not from this land. I don't know what that's I mean I I can't respond to that. What do what do you mean that the grandmas are not from this land?
This we're talking about a racial par that grandmothers are not from this land. Uh you're talking about thin cuz white is not white has no does not does not pertain to any character of nationality or civil political polity.
White does not identify.
White does not identify an existence of a people.
White does not identify the the consequinity, ancestry, lineage, stock, national origin, parentage, parity, pedigree, lineage, bloodline of any people, whether they're from this land, Netherland, we're talking about white having does not identify an existence of a people.
So why is it used?
There's no does it pertain to the character of nationality, civil and political polity.
has not been known or acknowledged by the family of nations.
Doesn't identify a nation or national sovereignty.
Doesn't identify statehood.
So there's no existence.
So we looking at so let's look at the where's the what's the origin of this paradigm well in 1684 the man whose name is France wire banire ber n i e r he developed what's called the new division of the earth he lived lived in India for 9 years and while living in India he studied the cast system in India.
So ranking people based on social status.
So France why Bener and his new division of the earth 1684 he developed a cast system and so in developing a cast system he had Euro Euro Asian subsaharan African East and North East East Asian semilaps. So those are the four classifications that France developed.
So this so the beginning of classifying people this new division pay attention to the word new. this new division of the earth of classifying the human family into these that he developed this classification system.
But keep in mind this was this is tied this is a cast system cuz he studied the cast system in India for 9 years.
So this h this this system of hierarchy of six that was developed by sis Francewire. So this race paradigm the the con origin of it is that is patterned after a cast system.
Now he did not use black, white, red, brown and yellow.
In 1780 1758 called a Swedish naturalist.
Now France Bernair was a French French crologist and colonas was a Swedish naturalist and his 10th edition of sister ma natura in 1758.
He used black, white, red and yellow.
So this is the cast. So he had homo urus opacus. That's u that's e u r o p a e u s obiscus.
A l b e s c u s white European homo americanus replicas.
Americana replicas is spelled R E B E S C U S reddish skin red American Homo Asiaticus lur luridosis yellow skin Asian homo africanis niga black African so this is these are this is called an classification that's is this is 1758 in his 10th edition of sister my natural in 17 so in 1785 so now this how did the word caucasian become associated with white European and white how does the word caucasian is related to European and white not in its original application is not Caucasian are those who lived in a region the Caucus Mountains that's an ethnic group Caucasian is an ethnic group it's not European it's not white so how Did the word white and European become associated with Caucasian?
Well, his name is Kristoff Minor.
Kristoff Minor.
Kristoff. C H R I S T O P H. Kristoff Minor. M E I N E R. Kristoff Minor. He was at the Guggenheim high school with Johan Frederick Bloombach.
1785.
Kristoff Miner constructed the definition the the a the constructed the modern definition suppressing the original application of Caucasian and associated the define Caucasian as a superior race.
The most beautiful superior.
So this cast system once again France Bobair studied in India studied the cast system the social system of ranking people by social status and so called France Banana duplicated that concept and in his new division of the earth.
So this so this concept did not begin with Kristoff minor. We talking about 1684 France there. But Kristoff Miner using the word Caucasian which doesn't mean white or European is an ethnic group and within the caucus regent.
There are multiple nationalities, but as an as an ethnic group Caucasian now called Johan Fred Boombach and by 1784 he had already had two editions out of his natural variety of of man on the natural variety of mankind.
and Johan Feder Bumbach the German anthropologist.
So you don't hear much about Kristoff Miner.
Now Johan the reason why I hear about Johan Fred Bumba cuz he was well published in his third edition of on the natural variety of mankind.
That's when he developed expanded on colonist classification system.
So, Colonaeus had the European homo European opacus.
So what France Bob Benera did was associated the word Caucasian with that with yoga with colonese classification of Europeanist Homo European opacus that was in 1795 and we're calling days also added a fifth class so it's four four classifications with Colineaus called Johan Feder Boomach added the fifth class brown.
So he expanded on calling names work in 17 now in se in 17 at the end of 1789 the United States the first congress of the United States.
This is 6 months about 6 months after the enforcement of the United States Congress United States Constitution.
first Congress met. It's called the first Congress of that's after the enforcement of the United States Constitution.
And their first act was the 1790 United States Nationalization Act.
That's the first very first act of the first Congress after this the enforcement of the United States Constitution.
Now what the first congress did they didn't create they did they did not create this classification it already existed so the first congress homo Europeanist aus so the first congress adopted from colonyas's is third 10th edition sister my natural 1758 the first adopted Europeanist obus free white person and once again it was not the first congress that associated white with European in they adopted that. So be clear, it was not the first Congress. They adopted it from the from Colinas 10th edition system natural 1758 because the the consecration was already is already in place.
This is this is empowering.
Knowing the origin it does matter so that we can speak intelligently on the subject.
Identifying the years, the name of the studies, the individuals, it does matter cuz right we as a people we can't speak intelligently on the subject of race.
meaning we can't we do not speak in scholastically on the subject of race like I'm like I I people don't speak the way I'm speaking on race talking about the origin of it the origin of it this we speak on it as if it's real as If it's a people, black, white, red, brown, and yellow, we speak on this. It has that is if it ties to consequentity, ancestry, lineage, pedigree, national origin, descent, stock, existence, national sovereignty, having character of nationality and civil political polity.
We speak as if it has it identifies existence of a people.
So that's what I mean. I'm being very I'm I'm being very clear. We do not speak intelligently on race.
We speak as though it it identifies a people existence and it does not.
It's a fictional world appearing to be real.
So there's no remedy or returning a people to their original status and condition as long as they as long as our people stay in the fictional world because that the fictional world keeps us maintains our subjugation maintains the stripping of our nationality and culture identity.
There's no remedy, meaning there's no returning our people to our original condition and status.
There's no land right claims. It's a fiction.
So, do the do the do the Europeans live in it, too? Yes, they do.
But they created it and control it.
All right. If we created it and control it, we can live in it too. And we, you know, we be good.
Like we will be fine.
Like we will be fine living in the fictional world that we created and controlled.
Like it like so we so let's say it's the tables were turned. The tables were turned and we stole the Europeans's birthight.
We stole Donald Trump looking people's birthright. We stole their birthright.
We stole their land. We conquered them.
We're subjugating them.
So, we created this this race paradigm.
But we created it and we control it that. So, but we but we the but thing is but we still would have knowledge of who we really are though. But we got to play along. We got to we got to play along in this fictional world cuz we created it and we controlled it.
So they created it and they controlled it.
See, they don't. All right.
Our original condition and status.
That's where our remedy lies.
I want to let me go look at these. I have We got about uh look at these comments. Any comments or questions?
Like I said, type. We have Ambassador Trinity Davis Floyd in the house.
Peace and love. Good evening everyone.
Mother Daryl Walker. Peace Islam.
Rose. So race is a social construct.
Yes, race is a social construct.
We went gave you the origent.
We named the name the people.
Andre, it seems the UN has adopted the legal fiction despite of uh UN drip.
Yes, systematically it is very important because it shows this is Andre.
Uh yes, systematically it is very important because it shows the breakdowns and legality of the de facto mind, state and diplomacy to override birthright and heter heredetiment.
Uh yes it is. That's anniah atone indeed all details on any subject should matter the era date time etc. Islam.
Absolutely.
Raheem Bay is Ambassador Raheem Allah Bay Islam.
All titles Rosary Aiatic.
All right. So, so continue to type your questions and comments in. As I said, I will go to them periodically.
Please, if you have any questions, type them in. Any comments because I I'm taking my time and we'll be thorough with this.
So, we we know that this is a this is challenging for our people. But in order to to address it, we got to go to the you got to you got to teach the origin.
I don't know any other way.
You have to teach the origin of it.
You have to and teach the origin of it.
They'll see that is a fiction.
It pre the origin France ban his studying in India study the cast system even look even look at the look at the cast system in India in the 1600s because that's what he studied.
So you have to so this is important. So in order to to to to address this you got to give the people the knowledge of the origin of the race paradigm.
They think it's real.
Black, white, red, brown and yellow.
Black people. White people. Red people.
Black people. White pe white people.
Brown people. Black people. Well, those are the three. And so you don't hear much of yellow people and red people here. There's black people, red people, I mean white people, brown people. They think it's real. They think it identifies a people like that that people identify by their complexion and think that's real. Donald Trump's a white man. Why do you say that?
What do you mean, dummy Abdullah?
Dummy Abdullah, why did you ask me why I called Donald Trump a white man?
Dummy Abdullah, isn't it obvious? See that?
See the fictional world appearing to be real?
Like there's no it's there's no thinking.
It's it's conditioning, not thinking.
We're not dumb. So I'm not I'm not calling our people dumb. All I'm saying is we've been conditioned.
It's not thinking, it's conditioning.
It's programming.
It's not teaching, it's programming.
Cuz white does not identify an existence of any people, their ancestry, lineage, descent, genealogy, consequentity, stock, national origin, parentage, pedigree.
Like white doesn't identify a clan, doesn't identify a clock, a a a tribe, a kingdom, an empire, a nation state, national sovereignty, a a a culture identity, a national flag, a national seal, a national constitution, a national code of arms, a national Is it a land doesn't identify but doesn't identify existence.
It's fictional but once again they created it and control it.
We can't dance with them in that fictional world.
They created it and control it. You ain't You're not winning. You'll never win cuz they created it and control it to strip us of our culture identity and nationality and to bury our historical continuity as a people.
Remove our national sovereignty.
Remove our land right claims.
You'll never win.
Never on that which they created and controlled to what? Steal our birthright. Strip us of our cultural identity.
and nationality and historical and historical memory.
So our historical memory has been stripped from us.
White Yeah. Black people, you know what I mean? Yeah. You know, the black people built the pyramids.
Yeah. People of color. Yeah. People of color built the pyramids. Yeah. People of color. You know, you know, you know, black people, you know, they develop mathematics.
See, black people built empires and huh, you can't that's not a people.
Doesn't trace an existence.
You can't trace an existence.
There's no doesn't pertain to character any character of civil and political polity.
No kingdom or tribe or clan or empire or veillet or dalect or khalifhat or or imirat or doesn't identify like doesn't can't trace where you where that identifies a national sovereignty where they negotiated treaties and enter trade and commerce built empires and trade routes.
It's a It's like as if you wiped off the planet.
It's a It's a cultural erasal and removing other people's sovereignty and his disconnecting them from their their historical memory, their political power and political protection.
It prevents them from returning to to to from from returning to their original condition and status.
So there's political ramifications.
I got four here. Let me get engaged. It's gauge. All right.
Let's see what we have here.
All right. What about black American?
Africanamean. All right. Raheem Alab. So let me let me first address African-American.
I'm going to Africanamean has no character of nationality does not pertain to any character of nationality and civil and political polity.
African-American has never been known or acknowledged by the fab nations having no has no character of nationality or civil political polity.
Here we go. AfricanAmerican Africa continent.
So, so African American that constitutes three continents. Write this down.
Africanamean constitutes three continents and ismas and adjoining islands.
Continent Africa, continent of North America, two continents, continent of South America, three continent continents and ismas and ismas.
I t mu ismas, which is a small body of land connecting two larger body of lands.
That's Central America and then you have the adjoining islands.
So within the continent of Africa there are 54 nation states.
You have North America, Canada, United States is a nation state and you have you have Mexico.
Then you have Central America.
You have South America and they join it.
They're nation states.
So Africanamean does not pertain to any character does not of nationality or civil polopy cuz there there are the term African-American embodies over 100 nation states.
So, but the term itself has no character of nationality or civil or political policy. The term African-Amean does not identify a na a national sovereignty.
The national sovereignty would be the national sovereignty will be identified like like uh Mexico uh Canada, South Africa, Mikino, Faso, Dominica, Republic C uh uh Cuba, Costa Rica, uh uh banana uh uh Sinam uh uh Nicaragua, uh Pik Kinoaso, Naja, Mali, those those names have partaking of the character of nationality in civil political polity.
African the American does not identify a national flag, a national seal, a national code of arms, a national constitution.
It has no character of nationality or and political and political polity.
It's never been known and acknowledged by the famine nations.
See the laws, it doesn't have character of nationality, political politics. That's the key. It's like, all right, we we thinking, all right, it's better to be called Africanamean than black.
How like neither one has Let's Let's Let's look at this, my brothers and sisters.
Thank you, Raheem.
All right.
See, I'm not black.
I'm Africanamean.
Neither one has any character of national or civil political polity.
That's the whole point.
Like you, it has no character of nationality, civil political polity.
It doesn't identify national sovereignty.
So therefore, there's no protection under that.
doesn't ident there's no connection to a nation state doesn't identify a national national origin or your nationality of a people there's no national sovereignty that identifies with that. See that's the point there.
Not well, you know, it's more dignified, but the whole point it has no character of nationality and civil political polity. It's never been known or acknowledged by the famine nations.
Let's stay within the Let's stay within the political constructs.
That's emotional.
I'm I'm not black. I'm Africanamean.
Or somebody says then you start you bake black down. Well, I'm Africaname. as so as that as if they're as if that's better. How neither one has any character of n pertains to any character of national civil political polity.
Then so we have black American.
All right. So that's now AfricanAmerican.
Once again, a American identifies constitutes two continents and ismas.
Two continents and ismas and the Jordan Islands, but it does not.
So an African man and then African Africa, you know, the continent, but it does not pertain to any character. So there's no there's no legal you could not have a legal bond. It does not it does not where identify that you have a legal bond to a nation state cuz that's the whole point there.
African-American um it doesn't identify you have a legal bond to any nation state.
You're stateless.
You're stateless.
status person.
So then the head convention of status person kicks in because you said African-American doesn't because it doesn't pertain you you're stating that you don't have a legal bond to a nation state. I'm staying there.
Let's stay. Let's deal with the law matter.
Let's deal with the concept of international law principles regarding nationality. All right, here we go.
Nationality in the context of international law elements, legal bond, rights and duties, state jurisdiction, democratic protection, African-American does not does not tie to there's no elements does not contain any of those elements.
So let's stay within the framework of international law regarding nationality.
Africanamean is not placed within the framework of a n of a of statehood or or sovereignty. Let's stay within the framework of international law regarding nationality.
It's over. It's over.
Now, of course, black American, we already know about American.
We broke that down.
But black doesn't even identify a continent having no character of nationality and civil political polity.
doesn't does not identify in consequentity, national origin, ancestry, pedigree, genealogy, stock, parentage, lineage, descent, national origin as white doesn't see. All right.
We can the the I'm going to stay within the framework of international law and nationality, statehood, sovereignty, nationality, statehood and sovereignty.
So we can say, well, white means pure and rule of land. But keep in mind in the framework of nationality, statehood, and sovereignty, I want to stay there. I don't want to get off track. I'm not going to get off track. I'm not going to go into it, you know, rule of the land and, you know, I mean, purity and all that because we we we we we have to teach our people the framework of nationality, sovereignty and statehood.
We must we have to wait right so that we can be restored so that our the legal force so we can be restored return we return to our original condition and status so that we can be brought back into the family of nations.
So my going into white means purity and rule of the land and white mean it not going to get us back to the family of nations. So I want want to stay within the frame international law framework of nationality, sovereignty and statehood.
I will never move from that.
Y'all can talk on white means purity and ro that's y'all. Y'all keep that. Y'all keep that.
I know where I was before. I know that.
But that is not going to get us reconnected to the family of nations cuz that's what matters. Restoring the protection, restoring the international recognition.
Bring us back into the famine nations.
That's what matters.
That's what I'm saying. That's what that that's all that matters.
Now we have my man Satan eel.
We are Muslims Moore by birth nativity from the naval of the nation of your mother. We need to clean up our concepts. Who is your mother?
and tone ill and con ill indeed like if you go to Africa what country are you visiting and vice versa someone traveling to North America South America or any of the Jordan islands i.e. Central America BD bay Islam No legal bond.
Absolutely. African-American and black black American have no legal bond.
I got to drink some water here. My brothers and sisters.
Give me one minute.
Peace everyone. Can y'all hear? I just got to drink some water real quick. I'm um doing a hiccup thing.
I'm doing hiccups. I was doing hiccups.
So was All right. Thank you.
We have a question. We have a comment here.
All right. Post leuminium.
Post leuminium.
Returning re returning to the threshold.
The threshold post lemon threat limit is threshold after the threshold.
So returning to postlinium is this the the the status that there is an ex a suspension not loss but a suspension of your rights.
And so what whatever status you were at in at the time of your captivity, whatever your status was at the time of your captivity, you will be returned to that status.
You'll be returned to your original condition and status. Whatever that status was at the time of your captivity, you will be returned to that original status and condition postinium.
You you're captured now. You are released.
You return to the original condition.
So yet what that means is your rights are are not lost. They're just dormant.
That's dormant and you just returned.
That's postminium.
All right. Self-determination.
All right. So let me let me Rahee wants me to break that down.
Now self-determination there's there are several meanings to the term self-determination.
Uh President Wiljo Wilson was the one that pushed for pushed that.
Now, let's look self-determination and and looking at the the framework of self-determination.
What I want y'all to do, thank you, Raheem, is analyze the framework. And there's m like I said, there's several meanings for self-determination.
And I want you I want you to look at the framework of sovereignty and statehood.
So does the framework does the do the elements of self-determination closely relate to the elements of the framework of sovereignty and statethood.
So I don't I don't want us to run with the self-determination without really studying. Keep in mind there are several meanings.
Uh Raheem, you get a chance post those articles that I sent you two weeks ago to your WhatsApp on self-determination on your Facebook page.
So Raheem Alabay is going to share those articles if he can those links to his Facebook page. I don't think if you can share it if you can put it here. I don't know if you can put links here, but those links that's those two those three or three or four or five articles I sent you on self-determination, Raheem and uh there then you'll see there that there there's several different meanings.
So I don't I don't want us just to run with that.
I want us to study that and I don't want you to say Abdullah said anything. I want you to study it for yourself.
Yes, they will fight you about it.
All right. Reversion of sovereignty. All right. So, reversion of sovereignty.
All right. So, let's All right.
Thank you, Raheem. Now, Francis Bole, Francis Bole, he was uh he transitioned two years ago. He was an international law professor and he worked with the the Native people of Hawaii and the Hawaiian sovereignty movement. They he had joined it in 1992, but they had begun the Hawaiian sovereignty movement back in the 50s.
So he had joined in and assisting the native people of Hawaii in the Hawaiian sovereignty movement.
So what he did was in instructing the native people why assisting them and their you know their their move to recover their loss Hawaiian sovereignty. He pushed for them to file a case in the United States Supreme Court, self-determination case and the United States Supreme Court.
Remember, keep in mind the native people wi their original condition and status is that they belong to the Kingdom of Hawaii.
United States, the Kingdom of Hawaii in the 1850s and60s negotiated treaties with United States, France and Great Britain and other nation states.
They were I mean they were they were already in statehood.
They were already a state. They already negotiated treaties. They were part of the family nations.
So Francis Bole instructed and worked with the native people of Hawaii and then starting in 1982 1992 and filing a case a and a a self-determination case.
Huh?
That's a foreign court self-determin. They're already they were already part of the nations.
So let's say all right so they they they they they were denied and so so what? So let's say United States Supreme Court.
Yeah.
Yeah. United States Supreme Court made a ruling that the native people of Hawaii has a right to self-determination. Is that follow me my brothers? Let's think.
Let's think. Let's think.
So, let's say that United States Supreme Court made the ruling that the native people of Hawaii have the right to self-determination. All right, let's let's think.
I come to your house. All right. I say to y'all, I I Annayia, I'll speak to Annayia.
Sister Annayia, I say to you, Sister Annayiah.
You can go into your refrigerator.
I say to you, Annayia, you can go into your refrigerator.
What What would that mean?
that is that it's not self-determined and inherit.
It's not selfdetermined and inherited.
If Annayia can only go in the refrigerator like I so I have I give to it. There it is. Abdullah Ili Bay authorizes Sister Nia Bae to go into a refrigerator.
Look man, Sister Nia goes, "Man, man. Abdullah, he authorized me to go into my refrigerator." Oh, wow man. He came down. Oh, man. Abdullah authorized me to go into and somebody and I al says to Annayiah uh sister Annayia um are you aware that that's your refrigerator? This is your house and this is your refrigerator.
You don't need no authorization, no ruling from Abdullah.
You don't need the native people.
You don't need any ruling. Nor should you have gone to the United States.
It's your sovereignty cannot be determined by the United States.
Yes, the United States subjugated y'all in 1893, but the United States that that your right to your sovereignty is not cannot be determined by the United States.
Like you're going to the United States Supreme Court to make a ruling.
So that means it's not inherited on and self-determined if the United States a foreign court one the state that subjugated y'all making a ruling that you have a right to yourself to self-determination no it's inherit y'all decide that for yourselves it's inherit and self-determined so all right United States make the ruling And the people already got a right to self-determination.
So, so you so yeah, look y'all.
According to the United States Supreme Court case, see according to the United States Supreme Court, you know, case. Yeah. We got the right to self-determine, man. Man. Woo. man.
And I I come along.
Um, y'all do know that y'all were once part of the family nations.
Y'all do know that y'all would operate function as a kingdom. And you had your your your you have your queen. She never surrendered.
Your queen never surrendered.
She said she didn't sign a surrendering treaty.
Your queen fought to the end like you do you y'all do know that you negotiated treaties with United a treaty with United States 1850s Great Britain France.
So you going you're saying that you're putting up this United States Supreme Court case that you got a right to self-determination.
Are you aware that United States overturned two of their two or three of their own decisions? Row versus Ray Wade.
Now now the United States never made the ruling that United States denied the case denied the ruling. And the United States never ruled that United States that that the native people already had that. I said if United States had done it, but the United States make didn't make the ruling that they had the right is they is never was determined. The United States doesn't had the right to make the determination for them. That's they have been in heard right for them. They have the native people of Hawaii are the only people that have the right to determine for themselves. It's inherent and self-determined among them once you accept acknowledge that somebody else annihilator when if Anniah was were to acknowledge that if Anniah were to acknowledge that her right to go in the refrigerator was based on my saying it.
That means what?
That ain't self-determining and heard it.
So she's also acknowledging that I'm the one that can what? Deny her.
If she acknowledged that I'm the one that can grant to her the right to go in the refrigerator, she's also acknowledging that I have THE POWER TO DENY HER.
See the thinking exactly, Annayia. Right to move around my house. It's my house. Exactly.
Exactly.
Sentinel.
Uh your state is your state of mind. You need no recognition. They they they recognize your state of mind when you recognize it. And that is the state of mind of your ancient foremothers and forefathers.
Annayia obey. Someone else is giving me permission. Exactly.
It's mine but someone told.
All right.
Anton indeed because she would not be independent and free to determine that hers herself. Exactly. And under control of another person will Exactly.
Exactly. Now we now we thinking that's this is what I want. This is why I take my time to spur thinking.
You have the right to be yourself.
Exactly.
I can move without permission in my own house. Absolutely.
All right, let me see what I'm I can read next.
Oh, it's another case, too. I'm going to read another case.
But I wanted to have dialogue too. I just want, you know, critical thinking moments.
and Raheem had um given me some points to to go over.
Azawa versus United States.
This is the OZ AWA versus United States 20 26 260 US 178 um year 1922.
The term white person as used in revised stats uh 2169 and in all the earlier naturalization laws beginning in 1790 applies to such persons as were known in this country as white in the racial sense. So we already talked about in a racial sense how that came about when it was first adopted and is confined to person of the Caucasian race. So we already talked about it's confined to person. So how did it become confined?
How did white become confined to persons of the car?
Remember Caucasian is not a race.
That's not this original application.
But how did it become confined? How did white become confined to the Casian race 1795?
His name is Johan, German anthropologist Johan Fed Bloom. His third edition 1795 third edition on on natural variety of mankind. I just did the year, the name, his study.
All right.
Call his his discipline, his profession, German anthropologist. His nationality, German, see German.
His profession, anthropologist.
19 is third edition means was two before first edition being 1775.
Third edition 1795 on natural variety of mankind.
That's what he associated Caucasian with Europeanist white Europeanist albinist which was the classification that colonese established in his 13th edition of system of natural 1758.
So that's when it was confined, right? It was confined.
So what did Congress do? Put it in legislation.
That didn't begin with Congress.
Congress just put it in legislation.
That didn't begin with the United States Congress. it being confined to white Congress put it in legis. So, so the so the Supreme Court case the sup they're going to what colony France Bonire United States Congress was not the one that constructed the paradigm.
They adopted from an existing paradigm.
So this so the this United States Supreme Court is making a common understanding meaning. But how did that come about? How did the common understanding meaning come about?
I gave you the origin of it. See it being confined. The origin on the natural variety of mankind 1795 third edition of natural variety of mankind. Johan Freddy Bumach.
This is how you talk about race.
We're talking about race.
the origin.
H how they talking about race in the public as if it's real? If they're people, black, white, or we talking about race? See, they're talking about they're talking in the construct of the fictional world as if they're people. As if black and white identify people. As if black and white identify in existence. National origin, consequentity, nationality, stock, ancestry, parentage, pedigree, descent, genealogy, national sovereignty, national flag, national constitution, national seal, national code of arms.
They talk and it doesn't. They talking as if it's real. They talking. Yeah.
Black, white, you know, black, white, white supremacy, black, white, black, white. They're talking as if they're pe identify if they're talking about people.
As if they're talking about existence of a people, their nationality, ancestry, pedigree, descent, national origin, stock.
See, it's fictional.
appearing to be real through social engineering, conditioning, programming.
Mahogany Essence. Good evening, everyone.
Good evening. Deep State Sandwich. Well, if Well, if it's not real, well, if it's not real, why did you call yourself a Moore?
Huh? I'm I'm lost.
What's it? So, if it's not real, why did you call yourself a Moore?
That's the identity or B or Berber people. It's not fiction and it's not yours. All right, that's let me let me address that. Oh, I love you know I love this. All right, I know I love this.
All right, identity of a a Berber people now in letters and letters written by Queen Elizabeth in the 1500s. Queen of Queen Elizabeth and the Emperor Morocco Murad Rashad.
Murad Rashad and that you have the the commercial agreement, the 1580 commercial agreement between England and the Emperor Moroc Empire Morocco.
There are correspondences between Queen Elizabeth and Emperor Morocco is Murad Bashad.
And in there, Queen Elizabeth is identifying the people as Moors, not as Berbers. Not as Berbers.
Follow me.
All right. I'm not a Googler. Not as Berbers.
when when you have in the the captivity the um the trinitarian the trinitarian and mercarian. the trinitarian and mercitarian. The trinitarian was established in 1198 and the these are two European captivity orders that you know because the the and you had the mercarian established in 11 1238 600 years of captivity records identifying us as Moors that they were ransom they were um paying the Moors ransom to get the Europeans out of European Mo's captivity moors and corres diplomatic correspondence from the various kings and queens of Europe and captivity records in the Trinity House.
Moors and treaties between European powers and Morocco. Moors, not Berbers and and correspondences and state records, amateur records, captivity records.
Moors, not Berbers.
Not Berbers.
Follow me now.
Why not Berbers?
Why not Berbers in the treaties?
Why not Berbers?
Why Queen Elizabeth was the same Berbers?
King King Charles the first, King Charles II, King James the first, King James II, the Dutch kings and French kings. Why they weren't putting Berbers down? Why not? Why didn't they put Berbers in the in the treaties? Why they put Berber in the diplomatic correspondence? Why they put more?
I want explain that. Somebody explain that.
These are facts. They have berbers in the 15 in the 1952 case between France and the United States in the international court of justice. The most favorable nation case there the case summary.
There are three types of treaties to that that France U that was used to determine the extent of United States extr territorial jurisdiction in in Morocco.
Three types of Moorish treaties not Berber treaties.
The first type of treaties was the more treaties between the Moorish bilateral treaties not Berber say Berber bilateral treaties. the Moorish bilateral treaties between 1631 to 1892 with 10 European countries.
Why doesn't it say Berber treaties?
Why Moorish treaties? Why not Berber treaties? So you got to got to answer that. We got to answer that.
Got to answer that.
I'm going to wait for the answer.
I'm waiting for the answer.
They they got to answer with findings though.
I don't want opinions.
You're throwing Berber out. You're throwing the word Arab out. I don't see the words Berber and Arabs in the treaties and letters.
Show me right now. Send Show put the link. Put show me a letter a primary source letters treaties captivity records amity records state records maritime records. Show me the words Berber and era. Please show me. Give me a source right now. You got 30 You got 23 minutes. 33 minutes to present the source with Arab or Moore. I mean Arab or Berber. You're not going to just No, we're not doing that. We're not doing that. I want the source was Arab and Mo and Berber records. United States records kept with Moors the treaties between the diplomatic correspondence letters that I have in Mo part one and two moors. Moors moors moors I don't see Arab and Mo Berber.
Show me Arab and Berber.
Not Google. Don't show me no Google nothing. Show me primary sources.
Don't show me no Google nothing. Don't show me an article on what on Wikipedia.
Show me the actual gold to state records, amity records, captivity records, maritime records.
Show me that cuz I got letters. You got them too. Mo part one and two. You got them. Show me.
I'm waiting. All right, we got we got 30 minutes to show us. Just present Let's present the reference. Present the present the source. Let me go ahead and move on.
No, I'm I'm defending I'm defending our Morish nationality for our people. I'm not allowing that. I will challenge that. I will scholastically I will tear that up.
I will tear that up.
I will challenge anyone who comes like that to present the findings. That's it. That's all I want to see. I will challenge anyone, anytime, anywhere, any place to present the findings with Berber and Arab.
They can't do it.
He won't dare do it. I guarantee he going to talk some other be be crap. He going to start doing other stuff. No, I don't I want primary source. That's it.
There there's no back and forth. There's no back and forth. Just present the findings. That's it.
Shut me up.
Shut me up by presenting the findings. That's it. Shut me up.
All right. So, any other questions or comments?
Any other questions or comments?
All right. So, let me um All right. What is the what is the meaning of the United States Supreme Court Justice Daniels statement in the Drescott versus Stanford's case 8 1857 that the African Negro race never have been acknowledged as belonging to the family of nations that as amongst them there never has been known or recognized by the inhabitants of other countries anything partaking of the character of nationality or civil or political polity that this race has been by all nations of Europe regarded as subjects of capture or purpose.
What does that mean?
We got a lot of comments tonight, boy.
All right.
Finding your facts is that Al Key aman him um Pope Bay 22. But Abdullah, what is the difference between All right. What is the difference between what is the between Morocco Moroccan and Moorish?
All right. Now in in the in letters in letters and diplomatic correspondences I actually see both I see in treaties. I see both in treaties Moroccan and more Moorish or and more.
All right. So you're looking at the um well moorish is the adjective. So Moroccan, you're just looking at different spellings.
But there but that that that doesn't identify two distinct people. Moroccan and Morris doesn't identify two distinct people. You actually see the use of both of them in the various diplomatic correspondences. State records, amity records, captivity records, the emperor Morocco.
All right. So, let's look at it. I I give you one. The treaty of peace and friendship, the treaty of peace and friendship between his pure majesty emperor Morocco and the United States.
So you have Morocco there and but in the treaty you have more articles articles 22 23 24 you have more.
I just gave you a reference that has Morocco at the heading and then in the actual body of the treaty more I got to give y'all references. I just can't by opinion. I got to give references. I got to just got to refer to some some findings then I draw my conclusions from the findings. So how do you draw your conclusions?
How do you draw your conclusions from what findings?
You can't comprehend what I'm saying, can you? I don't know. I don't can't comprehend what I'm saying. What's that mean?
I want findings though. See, I I that this is this what I I when one cannot support this all I already know. I've been through this.
When one cannot present findings, they come, they do this.
I already know that. I know this strategy cuz you don't have the findings.
It's called deflecting. You're deflecting cuz you don't have the findings.
I'm calling you out. It's called deflecting because you don't have the findings. And he's going to call me a name.
He's going to result the name calling.
I've been through this.
He's going to result the name calling cuz he doesn't have the findings now. I'll become a name. I got it. I get you.
Yeah. Right on. I mean I That's what happens, brother. They don't have they don't have the findings, brother. I already know. And then after and then they the the the last thing they'll come with is call your name. I already know.
I already know. I I can I already know.
I can I can I can write the script. I know the script very well.
Been doing this for a long time.
Continue to put your questions in. Like I said, we're going to go until 9:00.
I'm just looking for I have some other things that some other notes here.
I can't like type your questions in my brothers and sisters.
Trinity, are you still on? Do you have a question? Trinity.
Ambassador Trinity, are you still with us? You have a question.
I went through my notes. I went through the two cases. I thought I had All right.
Humans called could could be divided in varieties. All national differences in the form and color of the human body run so insensibly by so many shades and transitions. This is in the uh there a five-part naming system. This is um Johan Frederick Blumach as five-part naming system in in 1795.
Humans could be divided in varieties.
Quote, "All national differences in the form and color of the human body run so insensibly by so many shades and transitions one into the other that it is impossible to separate them by any but very arbitrary limits." Arbitrary limits. It's not even scientific.
So you have the Caucasian or white, Mongolian or yellow race, Malayanian or brown race, Ethiopian or black race, American or red race?
How has France banire colineaus and Johan Feder boombox works been used to maintain the inter the international act of subjugation of our people?
How did the Europeans come to be known ethnic ethnologically white or Caucasian race?
Well, are whites not ethn ethnol if if not ethnic? Now, Caucasian is, but it doesn't mean European, you know, that's uh those that those who lived in the Caucus region, Caucus Mountains region.
So, Donald Trump is not a Caucasian.
Why? Because he's of German, he's of German and Scottish descent. So, if you look at Scotland and German, that's not in a Caucus region.
I mean, just that simple. He's not Caucasian because he is of Scottish and German descent.
What Kristoff Miner did in 1785 was construct a new meaning for Caucasian and associated that as the highest, you know, most beautiful. But that's a constructive meaning.
Caucasian doesn't mean that there are people but not Donald Trump, not Hillary Clinton, like slave slaves of people and Eastern Europe, the Slavic people.
And then so there there's different because you have those in the Baltic states the eastern Europe and in Eastern Europe there are multiple nationalities but slave would be slave is a is a like an ethnic group within that ethnic group there are multiple nationalities.
Hgarian.
Hargarian is in the ethnic group of slave.
Hargarian is a nationality.
Czechoslovakian.
Slovakian.
That's an ethnic group. Slave is the ethnic group. Within the ethnic group, there are multiple nationalities.
Well, Caucasian is the ethnic group.
Within the ethnic group, Caucasian, there are multiple nationalities.
and Scottish and German are not two are not two of them. Donald Trump's not Caucasian.
See, that's a See, that's called that's a that its current use its use over the past since 17 85 is that of a construction.
We have to know the original meanings.
We have to know the origin of this race paradigm.
How are we going to address it? We want to address it scholastically.
They're when they're talking race, they're talking they're talking in the colony France fictional construct.
This is let's look let's listen black white that's the calaeus France barber fictional construct and you can show you can see that you can show these f have the findings like you and talk you have to identify that the study the name of the the individuals the year you have to so so that like you you have to present it in that manner with specity as I'm presenting it. I'm showing you how to do it.
Um I'm demonstrating how to talk about race.
If I if I um white car white car so I so if I was standing next to a white car I wouldn't say I you like my white would look at me like I'm crazy you like my Or I would say why you like my white car.
Would I say do you like my white or would I say you like my white car?
That's black car. Now would I say you like my black or I say you like my black car?
Like who says you like my black?
But that's used for people though.
That's being applied for people. But that's a fiction though.
That's a fiction.
That's a stripping of our nationality, cultural identity, removing our national sovereignty, the barrier of our historical memory, the stripping of our land right claims.
It prevents us from returning to our original condition, original in and status.
Are you put a message? All right, let me All right, Trinhead. People think I am white but I am Africanamean.
I have to tell people that that through the bloodline I look like my grandmom and aunts.
Now I I know you say that you're that you're not white Trinity and that you're Africanamean and I and you heard me earlier Africanamean. That's that's so this is Thank you Trinity for this.
That's Africanamean does not refer to a nationality of a people.
AfricanAmerican does not refer to a national sovereignty or na a national flag, a national constitution, a national sovereignty, a state, a national court of arms.
Africanamean constitutes three continents, an ismas, and adjoining islands. There's three continents, an ismas and an adjoining island. Africa one continent which embodies 54 nations.
North America second two continents bodies three nations states c um South America I rec can't recall how many nation states and bodies in South America and then ismas central America then you have the enjoining islands you have Trinidad and Tobago you had uh St. Thomas Neves Neves and St. Thomas, you have Bahamas, Sarinam, but Africanamean has no does not partake does not partake of any character of nationality or civil political polity.
Africanamean within the within the international in the national nationality in the context of international law. Nationality does not identify you as having a legal bond to a nation state rights and duties on the national sovereignty of a nation state. Uh doesn't identify the state jurisdiction that that a nation state has doesn't identify state jurisdiction.
an African-American does not would not afford you diplomatic protection with the term African-American because it doesn't pertain to any character of nationality or civil and political policy. The this is the best way for me to explain it. Trinity within the nationality within the framework of international law within the nationality statethood and sovereignty framework.
national Africanamean does not does not denote a consequity, an ancestry, a pedigree, a descent, a national origin.
This is the best way for me to explain it.
And uh this is on that's been doing through condition because that the not not our people not being taught the the the the political and legal framework of nationality as well as the consequent and socioultural aspect of nationality.
All right. All right. So, we have 10 minutes here. Did that Did that provide some clarity?
Did I provide some clarity? Um, Trinity, this is what you say. Now, I know I'm I'm clear on that. But that is what you said. But I want you to be clear on when you say Africanamean.
I want you to know that Africanamean constitutes three continents and ismas in Jordan Islands. So I want you to go to a world map you get a chance.
the continent of Africa, the continent of North America, continent of South America, the ismas, Central America, and in Jordan Islands.
And I want you to look at the nation states within the continent of Africa, the nation state within the continent of North America, the nation states within the continent of South America, the I mean the and the nation states within the isma, Central America, and the nation states within the the Jordan Islands.
Each of them have their national constitution, national flag, national seal, national code of arms. Each of them have embassies and consulates in different parts of the world. Each of them have representatives, ambassadors and consils and consil generals and shares their foreign representation. So there's each of them have their foreign agents in different parts of the world. Each of them have you know their their representation in the United Nations or ambassadors to the United Nations but Africanamean because it doesn't pertain to any character of nationality or political policy. Trinity, this is the best way for me to And so let's deal with the white now that you're not white. Neither is Donald Trump.
No one is. All right. Let me let me address that, Trinity. Let me trust that you're not white. No one is.
So let me just speak. No one. Hear me out cuz Trinity.
No one on this planet. No one who ever walked this planet is white. No one is white.
So, all right. So, we want to be clear cuz we don't be clear cuz you would you would your your thinking was that you're not white that Donald Trump is white.
No, Donald Trump is not white.
Donald Trump is of German and Scottish ancestry.
So, Donald Trump is not white either.
Hillary Clinton is not white either.
Bill Clinton is not white either.
No one is white. White has no character of nationality in civil political polity. White does not identify in existence. White does not identify ancestry, consequentity, national origin, pedigree, descent.
Stop par parentage.
White has no charact. White has never been known or been recognized as belonging to the famine nations. White has never been known or been recognized by the inhabitants of countries of anything partaking of the character of nationality or civil political polity.
So you're not white. Neither is Donald Trump.
Okay, I will study that. Absolutely.
Absolutely.
So, the concept Trinity of people calling Donald Trump white came from Colinas his third edition.
Paul Lanaeus. L I N A E U S. L I N A U A U A E U S. Carl Lana, a Swedish naturalist. His 10th edition of Sisterma.
S Y S T E M A Nature.
N A A T R A E. Sister my nature his 10th edition 1758 he was the one that used black white red and yellow and associated that in four continents he ident they're using that for humans Europeanist aus so there's people referring to Donald Trump as life because of what his skin that concept has an origin that is his name is Colinas 1758 1758 10th edition sister my natural so now you can go to the origin of the thought paradigm of why people call Donald Trump white and why they will call you white but you're not white, neither is Donald Trump.
That's a fiction.
But that came from Colinas.
Thank this is good for you, Trinity.
Can you send that to my mom, please?
Yes, I'll send that uh tomorrow. If I don't send it, I'll send it tomorrow to your mom. Yes, absolutely.
Uh, you know what? I can send it tonight cuz I already have it written out. You know, I already have it written. I just go to my notes section, my my phone, Samsung notes. I'll send it tonight.
We got 5 minutes. I already got slow.
Johan, Freddy, boom, colony and France Baneer ignored and hit their darkkinned African moorish tu son came in 2000 grandparents to brainwash and divide humanity.
Well, my point Well, the ones that look like Donald Trump are benefiting.
The ones that look like Donald Trump are controlling it. The ones that look like Donald Trump are benefiting. So, that's I mean I mean I mean I'm not going to play. The ones who look like Donald Trump are controlling it and benefiting it. Benefiting from it.
All right. So broke down broke down the meaning and one should see the above shows no difference. A Moroccan is a Moore. Moore is a short for Absolutely. But I wanted to give sources too that show that there was absolutely brother Anton.
Good job, Big Jersey. All right.
All right. We got three minutes. All right. So, um, hit that like button if you haven't done so already. hit that subscribe that that bell. If you haven't subscribed, just please do so. Um Hank has other programs, other um presentations on during the course of the week, so check those out. Get hit that notification bell so you get the notifications. All right, I want to thank Hank. Uh it's been two and a half It's been a great ride, two and a half years.
And uh so thank y'all for tonight. Share this share the recording um share the recording to your your social media platforms. I trust I did some some good and um providing some clarity, providing some some strong references and some some strong that that you can move forward in with this knowledge based and to to scholast to talk about race from a scholast from a scholarly perspective because the discussion of race that's a fictional world. That's not a scholarly discussion of race that they're having in the public. They're not there's no scholarly discussion of race. That's a fictional world.
The Europeans maintain control with that to how they're discussing race. But how I'm discussing race night now, this is stripped. This how we strip them.
We stripped them.
This was good. Thank you, Trinity.
Thank you, Annayia. This was great.
Thank you. All right. So, this this uh this Saturday, King Albay will be in town. All right. Uh brother Raheem, put that information in. Put that information in, Raheem. Uh from 12:00 to 4:00. from 12:00 to 4 this Saturday and Queens.
All right. From 12:00 to 4, Raheem will put that information in. King Alb will is uh um using legal tools to to safeguard fact. King called me twice already. I sent the king the link three times to a messenger. All right. Uh using legal tools to to protect and safeguard our communities. Um this Saturday. All right. The week is here now.
Uh we've been marketing this for about 4 months. The week is here.
Uh so looking forward to seeing King for the second time. Uh it's a song for the first time in person. It's um May March May May 12th, May 18th, 2024 as he came here for Philadelphia for the the Morris um Moorish um nationality conference.
Oh, King is here.
King, you called me twice. I sent the link to you, man, twice to your messenger. All right. King is on. All right. So, King will be in the house in Queens, New Queens, New York. Jamaica, Queens. Uh, we'll be arriving on S on Friday. All right. Uh, Raheem, put that information in. Uh, we'll post a flyer.
Uh, so thank you everyone. Uh, peace.
So we do have some more time. All right.
So put that information in Raheem if you can. We have time. Uh he is we have Richard Ammoon Ra Bay Islam.
Now we got a lot of good comments tonight. Very active. That's what I want. That's why I say I wanted to um because this is this makes it more effective presentation when people are engaged.
See that gives me idea where y where you the audience is. All right. All right.
Peace everyone.
Peace.
I am here.
M I am thankful.
Related Videos
DeenTheGreat Is Absolutely DISGUSTING
challzbrown
681 views•2026-05-29
Choa Chu Kang Tragedy Raises Questions About Warning Signs and Relationship Violence
TwentyTwoThirty
872 views•2026-05-29
Why Is It ALWAYS About The Pregnant One? 😂
alikicomedy
9K views•2026-05-30
Flotilla activist on 'racist' response to Ben Gvir's video of her
MiddleEastEye
13K views•2026-05-29
10 French Cities That Could Collapse First as the Homeless Crisis Worsens
InsideEuropeToday
359 views•2026-05-29
Elections Are Rigged! Only Those In Government Can Tell How ~ Diana Ngao & Mark Ouko
RadioGenKe
696 views•2026-06-02
White People RECOUNTS How Great Black People Are Becoming So Fast Now They Can't Take It
mrsan_20
939 views•2026-05-30
Foreign-Owned Shops Targeted as Anti-Migrant Tensions Rise in South Africa
aljazeeraenglish
25K views•2026-05-30











