This analysis provides a rare, noise-free look at market cycles by grounding speculative sentiment in the hard reality of on-chain cost structures. It is a sophisticated reminder that true market bottoms are defined by structural capitulation rather than mere price action.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Bitcoin's "End of Bear" Signal Just Triggered — Here's What It Means
Added:A number buried inside Bitcoin's blockchain just quietly flipped. And in every previous cycle, this exact flip has shown up right before the market's darkest chapter came to a close. It has nothing to do with price charts, nothing to do with candles, or resistance lines.
It's about who's holding Bitcoin and at what price they bought it.
And when you compare those two groups of holders, the the recent buyers versus the long-term believers, something just happened that has only happened a handful of times in Bitcoin's entire history. I'm Kenzo, and this is Kenzo Finance, the channel where we break down what's really moving behind the crypto and macro headlines without the hype and without the noise.
Today, we're going deep into a signal that on-chain analysts are calling one of the more reliable markers of a bear market's final phase. Not a bottom call, not a buy-now moment, something more nuanced and honestly more interesting.
Let's get into why this matters. Every Bitcoin holder falls into one of two broad camps. There are short-term holders, people who bought their coins within the last 6 months, and long-term holders who've held theirs for longer, some for years. Each of these groups has an average price they paid to acquire their Bitcoin. Analysts call this the cost basis. Here's the part that matters. Historically, when the average cost basis of short-term holders drops below the average cost basis of long-term holders, it tends to mark a very specific moment in the cycle. It suggests that the newest buyers, the people jumping in right now, are on average paying less than the people who've been holding for a long time.
That's a signal of exhaustion. It suggests capitulation is largely already happened. And what's left is quieter, more patient accumulation.
According to on-chain data shared by the analytics platform CryptoQuant on July 18th, that exact crossover just occurred.
The short-term holder cost basis dropped from around $112,500 down to roughly $69,000.
That's a massive shift in a relatively short window, and it tells a story about what's been happening beneath the surface of recent price action. So, what does that story actually mean?
Let's unpack it. To understand why this matters, you have to understand what a cost basis crossover actually represents in market psychology.
When Bitcoin's price falls hard and stays lower for an extended period, two things tend to happen simultaneously.
First, long-term holders, the people who bought years ago at much lower prices, mostly just sit still. Their cost basis barely moves because they're not buying or selling in large volume. Second, short-term holders, the newer entrants, keep buying in at whatever the current price is.
As the price keeps sliding, each new wave of short-term buyers is, on average, acquiring Bitcoin at a lower price than the wave before them.
Eventually, if the decline goes on long enough, the average price that short-term holders paid can actually fall below the average price that long-term holders paid, even the adjusted long-term figure, which filters out extremely old, dormant coins that haven't moved in 7-plus years. That adjustment matters because, without it, ancient wallets that may never move again could distort the picture. When that crossover happens, it suggests something important.
The people buying Bitcoin today, in the middle of the downturn, are willing to accumulate it at prices that are statistically more attractive than what long-term holders originally paid.
Historically, this kind of positioning has lined up with the tail end of previous bear markets, not the exact bottom, but the neighborhood of it. It's worth pausing here because this is where a lot of misunderstanding creeps in.
This signal is not a prediction. It's not a countdown clock.
The analyst behind this specific report was very clear about that distinction, stating that the crossover doesn't mean the bear market ends the instant the signal fires, or that the bottom is already locked in. Instead, it suggests the market may be entering its final phase, a stretch of time during which gradually accumulating assets, rather than trying to perfectly time a single entry point, has historically made more sense for some investors.
And that's an important nuance because Bitcoin has a long history of overshooting expectations in both directions.
A signal like this can appear, and price can still grind sideways or even lower for weeks or months before any real reversal takes hold. Some analysts describe this in-between period as a kind of accumulation zone where smart money and patient capital slowly build positions while sentiment is still largely negative.
And that negativity is worth talking about because it's usually loudest exactly when signals like this start to appear. Fear tends to peak late in a bear cycle, not early. The headlines get darker, the retail interest fades, trading volume often drops, and it's precisely in that quiet unloved period that on-chain data like this tends to shift first long before public sentiment catches up.
So, the real question becomes, has this kind of signal actually meant something in the past?
Let's look at the history. This isn't the first time this exact crossover has shown up. According to the Crypto Quant chart referenced in the July 18th analysis, the same short-term versus long-term cost basis crossover has appeared in multiple previous Bitcoin cycles. And each time it was followed, eventually, by a second and different crossover, one where the short-term holder cost basis climbed back above the long-term holder level. That second crossover, the upward one, is what analysts associate with confirmed bull market conditions. It suggests that new buyers are now paying progressively higher prices over time, a sign of returning confidence and rising demand rather than exhausted capitulation.
But, here's the detail that deserves real attention. The gap between the first crossover, the end of bear signal, and that second bullish confirmation has not been instant in past cycles.
There's historically been a transitional window in between. Sometimes that window has involved continued volatility, choppy price action, or extended sideways movement before the bullish confirmation actually arrived. This is exactly why analysts frame the signal carefully. It's less like a finish line and more like a mile marker. It tells you where you likely are in the broader race, deep into the later stages of a downturn, without telling you exactly how many more miles remain or whether there might be a few more dips along the way.
There's also a bigger structural question worth raising here.
Does this pattern still apply in a market that looks very different from Bitcoin's earlier cycles?
Institutional participation in Bitcoin today is far larger than it was in previous bear markets. Spot ETFs, corporate treasuries, and larger financial institutions now represent a meaningful share of total holders. Some might assume that changes the underlying psychology of cost basis behavior entirely. Interestingly, the analysis behind this signal suggests the core pattern hasn't fundamentally changed.
Short-term holders still tend to accumulate through prolonged declines until their average cost drops below that of long-term holders, regardless of who those short-term holders actually are. Whether that holds true through an entire cycle dominated by larger institutional flows is something analysts are still watching closely, and it's a genuinely open question rather than a settled one.
What we can say is this, on-chain data, like cost basis crossovers, gives a different lens than price charts alone.
It looks at actual holder behavior, real coins changing real hands at real prices, rather than just short-term price momentum.
That's part of why analysts continue to pay attention to it, even while acknowledging its limits.
So, where does that leave things heading into the months ahead?
A cost basis crossover like this doesn't answer the question everyone actually wants answered, which is, where exactly is the bottom and when does the next bull run start?
No on-chain metric can promise that with certainty, and any source claiming otherwise should be treated with caution.
What this signal does offer is context.
It suggests that, based on historical patterns, Bitcoin may be moving through the later stages of this bear phase rather than the earlier or middle stages.
It suggests recent buyers are, on average, paying prices that are historically associated with accumulation phases rather than euphoric buying phases.
And it suggests that if past cycles are any guide, the eventual transition into a confirmed bull phase has tended to follow eventually after signals like this one appear, but eventually is doing a lot of work in that sentence. Markets don't move on neat schedules and macro conditions, interest rate expectations, global liquidity, regulatory shifts, geopolitical risk can all stretch or compress these historical patterns in ways that on-chain data alone can't predict.
This is also a good moment to underline something important. None of this is financial advice and nothing here should be taken as a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any asset. On-chain signals like this one are tools for understanding market structure and historical context, not shortcuts to guaranteed outcomes.
Analysts studying this data are watching it as one input among many, not as a standalone answer.
What's genuinely fascinating here is how much information is sitting quietly inside blockchain data that most people never look at.
While headlines focus on daily price swings, this deeper layer, who's holding what, at what price, for how long, has quietly told a consistent story across multiple Bitcoin cycles.
Whether that story continues to hold true in this cycle, especially with a very different investor base than in years past, is something we're going to be watching closely on this channel.
If you found this breakdown useful, it genuinely helps the channel when you subscribe. That's how Kenzo Finance keeps producing deep dives like this one instead of shallow headline reactions.
And if you want to stay ahead of the next signal, the next data point, the next shift in market structure before it becomes mainstream news, this is exactly the kind of analysis we'll keep bringing you. Thanks for watching. I'm Kenzo.
This has been Kenzo Finance, and I'll see you in the next one.
Related Videos

Multi Vendor Multisig w/ Seed Signer, Hodl Dee & QnA
BitcoinMagazine
985 views•2024-09-05

Oasis Week in Review: Latest blog articles, workshops and more
OasisFoundation
135 views•2024-10-18

Kaspa: How ZK Turn Blockchains Into Settlement Layers (Part II)
cxc
1K views•2025-12-19

以言會友 EP13|當比特幣屢破紀錄 區塊鏈技術能帶來什麼?
dotdotnews
293K views•2021-01-05

Soroban Development: Ecosystem Growth, and the Rise of 70+ Smart Contract Projects
SorobanOfficial
1K views•2023-07-19

Balaji Srinivasan I The Fiat Crisis | Pragma Tokyo 2023
ETHGlobal
37K views•2023-05-06

$22 million NFT scammers arrested (insider evidence)
coffeezillaextras
806K views•2025-02-03

SYMMETRICAL TRIANGLE HOLDS THE KEY TO NEXT MOVE" DON'T IGNORE
xrpfuturemillionaire
800 views•2026-03-15
Trending

Playstation NO DISC/NO BUY Fight Is Over...
DavidJaffeGames
4K views•2026-07-23

Steam and Xbox Just Dropped The Hammer On PlayStation
OhNoItsAlexx
9K views•2026-07-23

Americans Confused in Australia for 17 Minutes Straight
IWrocker
17K views•2026-07-23

SuperBike Factory Has Gone... What's Next for the Motorcycle Industry?
thatbikersimon
11K views•2026-07-22