This analysis provides a sharp look at the intersection of procedural law and bad-faith litigation, exposing how the system filters out those who weaponize the courts. It effectively balances the spectacle of a "lolsuit" with a serious examination of the legal safeguards designed to protect judicial integrity.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
FRIVOLOUS FERDERIGOS FILES AGAIN?!? LOLSUIT UPDATE AND GABE'S ARREST VIDEO
Added:assume that.
>> That's a hard one to assume. Well done, >> but I'll assume it.
>> Why don't you just do it?
>> Are we still in a hypothetical? Because that's not what happened here.
>> Were you there?
>> In my opin.
>> That's a hard one to assume, >> but I'll assume it.
>> Why don't you just do it?
>> Are we still in a hypothetical? Because that's not what happened here. Were you there?
>> In my opinion, in my opinion, the imaging finding >> I know what your opinion is and Mr. She when the judge speaks you will be silent.
>> 2in pipe.
>> I want nothing to get pregnant.
>> Why don't you just do it? And just because I watch a video or parts of a video doesn't mean I'm a stalker.
>> Why don't you just do it?
>> Megan. Megan, stop. Oh, [ __ ] you. Oh god.
>> Believe you have a filter turned on in the video settings.
You might want to uh find >> uh it's douche and uh pregnancy baker.
Never blood yeah you hit go live I hear don't blend the mirror for the fly you saw you built the stage ring light halo crying villain arc potato can't fatal overshare diaries legal threat shaky sue the whole planet cuz the comments got snaky You call it harassment, I call it replay. You filmed the mess in 4K every day. I didn't script it, didn't cast, didn't scout.
You tripped on your ego. Now I'm trending off CL substack manifesto.
Spell check deceased. Paragraph long, but the logic real brief. Neighbors need restraining orders. Court dates pending.
But I'm the bad girl cuz your rep is bending.
The more you act up, the more you get strapped to my plow in the field you grown. Every cell phone clip is a row I reap. You farm your chaos. I just harvest cheap. This is America. Freedom on speech. If the shoe don't fit, let it slide on your feet. You perform the circus. I just buy a seat. You feed a joke. I don't even got a tweet. Let fill a migration face on vacation. Still got the nerve of defamation accusations. You stop folks lawns but call me obsessed.
Ma'am, you filmed it yourself. Exhibit a press. Yes. Court filing hobby lawsuits on repeat. Paperwork for you losing in the street. Crying bullying. Why you rage for views? Demonetized drummer with tell all in the views. You don't want laughs. Cool. Here's the hack. Log off.
Go heel. Don't hit post on the crack. No stream. No meme, no threat to unpack.
But you love the spiral. Number say that the more you act up, the more you get strapped to my plow in the field you grown. Every meltdown moment ging. You plant the circus. I just stretch the beat. Free country. Say what I please.
You uploaded the clowner. Don't sue me.
You like the match then scream at the flame. I just watch the smoke spell out your name. Yeah. Yeah. Drop down this live without you. Ghosted eagle. You black came at the flame.
Accountability ghosted ego on tour.
Blame the audience. Never the lure. If attention's a drug, you double the dose.
Then shock Pikachu when the laugh. So here's the deal. Real simple math. No crop. I ain't got a pass. You stop the show. Silence. No cow. But until then, welcome to the plow.
>> Faster.
>> Don't slow down now, boo. I'm so proud.
So proud of you.
>> Don't slow down, boo. I'm so proud. So proud of you.
>> Don't slow down, boo. I'm so proud. So proud of you.
>> Don't slow down, boo. I'm so proud of you.
I'm in charge because Megan is muted.
That's right. Megan's still muted. She's speaking out yet. What's up everybody?
I'm here.
I had to refresh the studio because it wouldn't start. That was really annoying. So, there was a delay there. I don't know what happened, but that kicked out of all of my panels. Damn it.
Anyway, welcome back after the weekend.
It feels like I haven't been here in a long time. I don't know. I know. It feels like a million years. It's weird.
>> A great weekend. I went uh I saw Death Cab by Cutie uh concert, which is a blast from the past.
>> It is indeed. It is.
>> I did that. That was a lot of fun. Uh saw family. Uh we wished them well and sent them on their way yesterday. So, life is getting back to normal. But, um it was a really good visit. It was a lot of fun. Hangry and Hangri Ata had a good time even though Hangria got sick for some of the visit. Uh but you know we um we had a good time. I hear you guys had a good time >> over the weekend.
>> Oh yeah. It was a very eventful weekend.
It was very interesting >> and yet the hits just keep on coming.
>> They just don't stop.
>> It was good. It was very good. I enjoyed it. I um I'm always surprised by these people. You know, if they weren't so stupid, they could be dangerous.
Luckily, they're stupid.
>> Although, there's a part of me that thinks some of them could be dangerous.
>> I mean, they could be dangerous in the sense of anybody could be dangerous in the sense of walking up and being dangerous to you mentally when somebody is dangerous. That's the key, >> you know? I mean, that that's the real key.
Well, I started a poll over on you the ye old YouTube and um I can't believe that it's almost neck andneck. I put up a poll that says the best way for Lips to prove she's not a vexacious litigant is to only file what's necessary or bombard the court with paper.
>> You know how she could she could prove it? She needs to sue more people. Pro, >> what do you think the chat has picked?
So, >> you said they were neck and neck. So, >> yeah, they're almost neck and neck.
>> I'm thinking they said bombard because they're >> 56% think she should only file when it's necessary. 44% though.
>> Terrible advice.
>> Are are on her side with the bombarding the court with paper.
>> Terrible advice. She should keep bombarding. That's great advice.
>> I agree.
>> I guys, I don't know if you know this or not. I literally would just receive this information a couple hours ago. So, I'm sure you don't know, but legally lips, that's right, Leslie Fertoigos has filed another >> frivolous piece of [ __ ] motion in our lawsuit against her. And she is now asking for a hearing before our hearing in 10 days to decide the thing that we are deciding in 10 days. Yeah, she would say hearing before the hearing to decide the hearing that we're actually going to present evidence for at the other hearing, but she's like, "No, decide it before YOU HEAR EVIDENCE NOW."
>> YEAH, she wants it now and she wants it before the hearing that's actually scheduled. How does everybody think that one's going to land with the judge?
Anybody got any uh any thoughts on how that's going to go?
>> Since Since nothing has really landed with the judge, I'm going to say It seems nothing will happen, you know. I mean, what what has has she really accomplished with this flood of stupid besides making us laugh? That that has been good. I mean, >> you know, >> Yeah. I don't know.
I I don't know.
>> You and I, you know, we never finished that last thing. So, there's one page on it that you and I we need to read one thing off of that last one together.
Okay.
>> Off of the >> Oh, yeah. Mhm.
>> We need to There is one.
>> Bring that up for sure. I think I have to reset the screen share screen again.
>> I want that last page. Okay.
>> You've got it right.
>> Yeah. Yeah. It's right here.
>> Okay.
>> All right. Check it out. You see this paragraph? Just read this paragraph with wherefore. Read that to me, Megan, please.
>> Oh god, I It's so small. Okay, hold on.
>> I will read it then.
>> You're going to have to read it cuz I can't get that close to my screen.
>> I'm like, that's not what you said. Oh, wait.
So, >> that's what she said.
>> Let's wherefors here. All right. So, we'll skip this because she wants it of course denied and stuff. And she also part two she's asking the judge to quote order the plaintiffs to reimburse costs Lesie Fergo spent in defending this motion including but not limited to West Law fees.
Court reporter fees.
Wait, what?
Court reporter fees fees. What? When did she have a court reporter?
>> Yeah, exactly. Transcript fee. Where's the transcript fees?
>> What transcript?
>> Printing fees. They want what? Printing fees and supply fees. What supply fees? And best yet >> supplies like staplers and paper clips.
>> I get like why would you have that? All she's doing is filing something electronically though. She has accessor fees.
>> Yeah. No, he gets better. Check this out. and three, order attorney fees under 57105 that Michael Ferdoriggo's Esquire acrewed and work while representing Lesie Ferdrios on this motion.
>> Excuse me. What now? No, no, no, no, no, no, no. She is proay on this motion.
She filed it prosay.
She cannot now say that Michael wrote this motion because then she wouldn't be allowed to turn it in because she's prosay.
>> She just asked for an army of [ __ ] expenses.
>> Yeah, but she's not vexacious though.
>> Exactly.
>> Keep it up, Leslie.
>> Oh lord. between this >> up >> between this and the 2 and 30 exhibits.
You know what's really beautiful about those exhibit? Oh, let me let me Oh god, we didn't talk about that. Let's not we won't we won't spend all month talking about them, but let let me grab something real quick. Okay, I'm going to get an exhibit list because I I do want to make a kind of a I guess kind of a point with this. All right. Remember we were talking about the exhibits and what she was going to >> Yeah.
>> Oh, yeah.
>> So, she has a little section. I'm going to put this >> I noticed that there were no exhibits on the one we had and then I saw that we got another one >> from exhibits, but I >> about that. So, you notice these at the bottom. All right. First of all, some are misleading. Like when you read in, you'll notice like the death threats.
That's from a 2021 case, for example, right? You know that would be okay.
Well, remember PQR. Remember R is M.
There's no last name. I love that, by the way. It's just Michael's affidav.
It's Michael affidavit.
>> Michael affidavit, >> right? Michael affidavit and Lisa Lee affidavit. So just Lisa Lee. Okay, remember that. So it's PQRNS, right?
Okay. Well, let's look at those together. Well, let's just It'll sounds like a lot to cover, but trust me, it won't be. Give me one second. Let me get them situated.
Here we go. All right. So, check these out. You're going to love these. These are >> I did notice I was really looking forward to reading Lisa Lee's affidavit, >> and I was very disappointed that it wasn't there.
>> Look, here we are. Here's this is uh P.
So P was um death threats. Check the death threats out from this other case.
Here they are. Check it. Wait, there >> they are not.
>> There are no death threats.
>> Yeah. Now, here is process words.
Exhibit two, exhibit Q are a death threat.
>> This is process server affidavit from another case, by the way. Here we go.
Check this out. It's wait.
>> Oh my god. Leslie, proofread your [ __ ] >> Lesie, this is so wamp wamp.
>> Here is Michaels. Would you like to read Michael's?
>> Sure. I would love to read Michael's.
>> Okay. Wait, wait. It goes. But notice, look, wait here. Do a little uh do a little bit of the alphabet with me.
Like, >> okay.
>> What comes after R?
>> S.
>> S. Okay. Well, let's see.
Wait.
>> So, if we want to see her affidavit, it's right about here. Nope. It is not there.
>> I zoomed in on this dark line. By the way, it's not hidden in there. Like some kind of Easter egg. It wasn't there. So, >> yeah, there was a bunch of stuff like that. I >> Did you even look this over before you turned it in?
>> Shame.
>> That deserves the shame bell. I'm telling you, >> some of the stuff she has pulled is so stupid. In fact, one of my favorite things in this, you know, she has a police report talking about the school stuff. That's uh it also it cuts off right where you know that that report we're looking at that uh just cuts off >> you know it just stops. Yeah. That's how the one in the exhibits does. It just stops. It's half a page. It just stops.
>> She doesn't want the second page that says we're not going forward with this because we couldn't identify him.
>> Yeah. And doesn't put it into the court or anything which is so garbage. Also, I love that her evidence that Rosyn and I did something together >> are streams of us doing of talking about other cases.
>> Does she think that she's Laura Owens?
>> I have no idea. Why does it say Megan and Rosyn working together to contact my school? And then she puts up two Laura Owens streams.
>> Exactly. And then she >> One of which says court postponed.
Nothing on there says school. No, it's about another person. Totally. Like you said, >> it's about another case. She is such an idiot. I I love I love that for her.
>> Well, >> um >> I was shocked by I was shocked by what her so-called evidence for harassment it was. So, essentially, they talked the other night though and they said some really interesting stuff. Like for example, they said that the affidavit that is blacked out part you there that was actually the principal you know that put in the report rather you know the police report that was the principal.
Now there's a real problem with that.
>> You know do you remember the um do you remember the letter that was sent to the principal? Do you remember that?
>> I you mean which one?
>> The letter by Rosalind Duke.
>> Oh yeah. of her saying, "I received these reports. Is any of this true?"
>> Yeah.
>> Yes.
>> Okay. Now, do you remember anything about the princ principal?
>> I remember that the principal was, I believe, a male.
>> Yes. Okay. That's >> And I believe and he also said that nothing like that occurred and he had no idea what she was talking about. So if you look at the top of this where this portion is reported, you'll notice this is talking about a female that is >> Yeah. So they said that this was actually the principal which unless I'm mistaken on something was a male, you know, wrote back >> that wasn't that was not the name because then there's a name uh in her affidavit which is this person And it's like Mia something. Yeah.
>> Right.
>> Yeah. That was not the name of the principal, but she's claiming it's the principal.
>> Yeah. And she is also on top of that now changed up since we called out the letter thing where she does not have a letter. She said that their texts that the principal had texted to other teachers and told them not to pay any attention.
>> Huh.
>> The thing that came out. Huh. So the way I understood all of this though, it was so bad when this call came in that it shut down an entire school district, thousands of kids. They were denied an education and it was so bad and there was so much panic.
The principal's name is Andrew Leftakis.
That's the person listed on the website and that is the person who wrote to Rosalyn, Andrew Leakis. And I do not see not the assistant principal. None of the assistant principles are named that other name that she's claiming.
>> I just look look the thing that I don't get through all of this is um the way that they they did all this. So they they pushed this for a little bit and then they pushed the hails the I'm just I've gotten away with words. I'm going to say groping, you know, since apparently they have not demonetized that word. All right. So They have they started promoting that idea. Then out of it after they started promoting oh my god this is what happened they said you know what uh on top of it if if you're bothered by this then all 400 of you that are watching need to give $10 to Lisa so she can sue Megan Fox. Wait what? So, you made an accusation about Hails doing some horrendous thing and then you fundraised to sue Megan Fox.
>> Uhhuh. Okay.
>> It's so bizarre.
>> Sure.
>> Yeah.
Yeah. So anyway, I thought that was kind of uh but as they as I have noted, so this would be um this would be something that uh you may or may not heard about. It's very wonderful. I actually um was very upset about this this weekend, Meg. You know, for you. Yeah. Yeah. I was I was mad, you know, because ultimately I'm suming Megan Fox. That's right. That's me. That's right.
you.
>> I will have you know you cannot hire the Paris attorney because I've already consulted with him about the case.
>> No, I heard the call. I heard the call where you were like, you know, you called in and it was the real Megan Fox.
>> No, that was definitely you pretending to be me.
>> No, no, no.
>> I did not settle. I never said that.
>> This is defamatory. Defam.
Never ever would I ever have done that.
>> Yep. That's what I heard. That's what I heard. Look, I came up with a master plan. You You're trying to ruin my master plan here. Look, I I'm going to show you my master plan. It is amazing.
Okay. So, check this out. All right.
Now, you brace yourself because this is amazing. All right. Okay. I I don't >> I don't want to give you whiplash either because it is so cool. Yeah. All right.
So, obviously, look, first I asked for the dollar redu to sue Megan Fox, right?
Mhm.
>> But then I you've heard this the statement, show me the money. That's what I do. I go and show Jay the money.
I don't give him the money. I show it to him because that's all he wants and that will motivate him to do things for free.
That's how it works. Then we will take the complaint and file it against Megan Fox. Yes. Then we will go to the court and here will be Megan Fox when she is overwhelmed by the guilt of not giving me the $40 I'm suing her over. That's I'm suing you for $40. But I don't know if I put that in.
>> I can't figure how you I don't I can't figure out how you think I owe you $40.
>> Oh, no. You see, I I figure you owe me because um you know, if the fats uh Well, if you owe the fats $40 and you're being sued for foyer costs somehow about Jeremy Hills, then obviously you owe me $40. I mean, that's only right.
Obviously. So, >> you're going to write mentle.
>> There's going to be a settlement there.
You know, you're even gonna backdate it to cover.
>> Yep. Then I'm gonna show it off on stream. I'm be like, "The plan worked."
You know, then I'm gonna do the foyer.
I'm going to get the foyer.
>> All right, Chad. I'm gonna have to fund raise for the money that I am going to be ordered to pay that umbrella guy in.
>> That's true. You need to help her out.
That's >> so super chats for uh for the $40 that I will owe him, I guess.
>> Yes. You know. Yep. because of the foyer.
>> But then I also need $39.99 to pay my paray attorney.
>> Yeah. I can't believe you, you know, you could have worked it out for like a penny or two, but no. Had to pay him 39.
>> I Yeah, I >> Megalodon's got a lot of costs coming, so you better help her out.
>> I'm telling you, you know, also in my amazing plan, there is a a little side step on it, you know, with thinking about. So, I'm not sure yet, but I might do this just to make it, you know, more effective.
So, you'll be like, "Wow, that really was impressive, Tug. I may actually go over to the bank and take your two 20s and trade them in for $1." You know what's really funny? Look at the president face that they put on it. Look at his like he's he has no mouth.
Look at his nose.
Strangely though, that looks like Andrew Jackson.
>> It does. It does. But he's like, >> but he's on a dollar.
>> He had a dollar. That says nothing.
>> It doesn't say anything.
>> It does look like Andrew Jackson who got his face blown off. But, you know, well, I didn't, you know, to to be fair, I don't have the $40 due. So, if there's expenses incurred, oh man, maybe I should put on my plan uh plus expenses because like AI ain't cheap, Megan.
>> No.
>> Then I thought just to make it uh really really go over, I thought about taking the $40, exchanging them for pennies, which is hard to do these days because most places are out of pennies like that. Banks >> pennies are collectibles now. They probably wouldn't give it to you because they're worth more than a penny. Now, >> look at they're bent, by the way. I don't know why they're >> Some of them look like you've been through the wave pool >> on the train tracks.
>> Yeah. And then I'm going to show all of that this off at the uh at the live stream where I celebrate. I be like, "Check it out. I'm gonna make it rain."
You know, if Jay's there, I might give him a concussion with all the pennies.
>> Yeah.
>> You know, you couldn't give him a concussion. He can't his He can't be more brain injured than he already is.
>> Don't worry about it.
>> Perfectly protected.
>> Donate to Megan Fox. She definitely needs it right now. She does.
>> I am under assault. Uh folks, I am under, you know, threatened litigation from all all fronts. I mean, now Tug's suing me and uh you know, Leslie thinks she's going to sue me again and Lisa thinks that she's going to sue me. Of course, she doesn't ever file anything.
I don't know why.
>> It's because why? Because she's been begging for $5,000 since January.
>> Did she say that she got She's up to 4,300.
>> I didn't name you. Suen Megan Melissa Egg Fox for nothing. That umbrella person. Do you need more money? I hope you take her for all her hot plates and leg warmers that she stole from Bug and Lug.
>> I'm such a pathetic. Ashley is so much more likable and successful than me.
But she overcame me being her wicked stepmother.
>> Ashley is 400 away from have more subscribers than Fle.
>> I sent you some selfies in a separate tip. Can't skip the queue with images.
I just >> I was reading over one of the So, I skipped a few of the posts that were out there from um from Otter Creek Pickles about about Ashley, by the way. I'd skipped a couple, you know, cuz we had so much stuff going on, right? So, I ran across the this one last night, though.
I could not believe what I read. It was insane.
Well, look at this real fast. I know. I know you had stuff planned. I I realize it, but I can't. It's the weekend. It's your fault. You can't go away.
>> Okay.
>> When you go away on weekends, you know, that's what happens. You go away on a weekend and then all this stuff gets found. I'm like, man, Megan, have you seen this? And I forget half this [ __ ] too. Oh, by the way, I've decided, too.
Um, since uh they are talking about how evil it is to call uh the 2L fat, I will no longer be using fat anymore.
>> We've come up with an alternative.
>> It will be voluminous.
>> Lisa is voluminous.
>> Is very voluminous.
>> Not not to be uh you know mixed up with voluupsuous. It's voluminous. the loom and it's like those >> containing much volume.
>> Yep. So in this look, she's talking about da da da. Who cares about all of it, right? But then she gets to this one part talking.
>> Wait, who wrote this?
>> This is this is Lynette. All right.
She's like, Ashley got jealous sibling rival. I got to >> I saw this. Oh my god, this is insane.
>> Yeah. Ashley was like, "Dude, this never happened." By the way, >> I'm sure it never happened. This is insane. This is one of her this slanders people's >> so she slanders people's uh you know reputations by saying by making accusations that as a child one of your children stood over the other one with a knife. How are you going to discount that? Right? How are you going to prove that that didn't happen? First of all, she tells these types of stories cuz she knows you can't prove it never happened.
>> Although we can all say with certainty this never happened. Well, and it's it's very interesting that the bunch of morons that get together with them, they're more likely to believe this than Lynette is a an abuser. Really, that's >> I just can't believe they've seen the evidence of all the things that she's constantly accusing other people of. And they for one second believe anything that she says.
I I really I can't. We have seen evidence now of her in multiple places where she lives accusing multiple people of the same thing. Child, it's always child essay. Always. There is no way that a person has come in contact with so many child essayers. It is statistically impossible. So, somebody is lying and it's her.
>> Well, it's not just that, okay? that the things that she's claimed about people that are still on the property. If that is indeed true, then why are you still on the property? You know, >> there are many things you can Yeah. But this this story, folks, there she was like in the middle of the night, you know, my darling Ashley stood over her sister in the middle of that night when her sister woke up sensing someone there. She realized that she was standing there with a butcher knife pointed at her. She screamed from mama.
Mom, mom, mom and dad, you know, and blah blah blah. This is a true story, you know.
>> I was like, "Oh my god." What this stuff does, this is the same thing they do to so many other people. And what it does is it motivates them to open their mouths and talk about what exactly these people really are.
>> It does. It motivates people. So, congratulations on motivating people to talk about who you really are.
>> Yes, it does.
>> I love it.
>> Speaking of uh who people really are, um Miss Verrigos is a vexacious litigant.
>> Uh that's that's my opinion and we're going to test it out in front of a judge. But this latest filing that she has uh decided to bless us with, shall I say, >> uh it needs to be looked at and we're going to do that. We're going to read through that right now and then in the rumble portion of the show. I want us to go over Gab's arrest video cuz it's hilarious.
And um we haven't had a chance to Tug was uh distracted the last time.
>> I was distracted last time so I will put it away. I'm putting my phone away there. I put it away right now. got my chat. I don't have to I don't have to watch it today. So, I'll put it away.
>> Right.
All right. Uh oops. I'm on the wrong thing. Okay.
>> Oh my god.
>> Oh my god. All right. Here we go. How >> dare you? You monster.
>> We got this today. It was filed today at 10:0722 p.m.
>> doesn't have grounds. We all know that there are no grounds. Now, if there are any grounds that they support, Megan, it's all about the grounds.
>> It's all about the grounds.
>> The grounds, baby.
>> Grounds.
>> I appreciate that. Thank you very much for the super tips. Super tips are fun and they will help me raise money for my defense against all these lawsuits that are flying at me, including one from my own co-host, the traitor. Uh, what a snake, you know. What a snake.
I cut it off just so I could hear you sing along.
>> I was getting a snake solo.
>> Oh, by the way, I wish Oh my god. You know what was released today?
>> The creditors hearing for the for Jan and Ron Owens, and it went sideways. It went sideways so hard. And the Department of Justice lawyer screamed at Jan Owens multiple times. Oh yeah. Oh yeah. cut her off, wouldn't let her talk, was like, "I don't want to hear that. Don't don't just stop stop talking." It was so great. It was the great It was the first time I think anybody's ever held Jan Owens feet to the fire. If you guys are wondering who the hell is Jan Owens, she's Laura Owens, the tonsil twin lady's mom. And there we found out today, oh my god. Ah, they had $523,000 of expenditures in a year and a half.
>> Whoa.
>> Yeah. And she lied on all her bankruptcy paperwork about how much uh how many dispositions or they had. They they said 43 or something. Turns out it was 523.
>> Good lord.
>> Yeah. Yeah. What? And it also came out that they gave $20,000 to Sarah, the sister. This is it's a great we've gota we've got to play this for this crowd.
I'm telling you what, Hales people, you need to hear what happens in a bankruptcy case when you lie and and and put stuff on your forms that isn't true.
>> You're also dealing with false accusers and everything else. So, you know, it's very it's very interesting how much of it you can recognize in some of these people.
>> I think what I might do is try to edit it down cuz it's a 2-hour hearing. I might just edit it down to some of the most important parts so I can play some of them for you guys just so you can hear what it's like when the bankruptcy court finds out that you committed perjury on your filings.
And it is unbelievable.
And they are calling her for a full deposition. Because the the DOJ lady was like, "That's it. I can't take it anymore. You can't pull up anything.
You're not you you're not looking at you're being uncooperative. You're not paying attention to what I'm saying, and you're refusing to pull up your documents. And so, I'm just going to haul you in here, and I'm going to put them in front of your face." She literally said that.
>> That's amazing. She's like, "So, so you have to say that you can see this document because you're you're you're basically not telling me the truth right now that you can't pull up that document." It was so great. And you guys, I'm telling you, that is going to happen to Lynette. It's going to happen.
>> Yeah. Yeah. They do not like see when people get in trouble like like Bruce and when Lynette also when she got in trouble you know in court they got in trouble for jerking around with the court you know they didn't you notice that's when justice really happens when you piss off the court because you monopolize their time you know you tick somebody off that actually has some power they will get you >> hey rogue I know that you watched it today. If you could, if there's any chance that you could um pull up a couple of hilarious timestamps for me and tell me what they are on uh Twitter DM, I would love to pull up a couple of those moments tonight just to let them hear the tone of voice that the DOJ attorney, and that's Department of Justice, cuz a Department of Justice attorney got assigned because of all the false statements. and she did both Laura Owens's bankruptcy and the parents and they're doing the exact same thing that Lynette was doing by filing and then dismissing and then filing again. It's all to just delay delay delay and it's completely you can tell >> who else seems to do that >> like that's what it seems like.
>> Oh yeah, cuz he's filed again.
>> He just did it again. Yeah, >> he just did it again. Eventually though, this will catch up to them. It's not something they can continue to do forever. It's just that it takes a while to get through it. But I'm telling you what, the Oh, and I do have to say again, this would be a good hearing for everyone to listen to to find out what happens when people who are observing don't follow the rules.
It it was so unfortunate that um a couple of people continued to have their phone unmuted and the attorney was getting so mad. She said a couple of times, "If this continues, we will close these hearings and the public will no longer have access to them." That's why it's so important that if you ever sit in on these hearings that you mute your phone and you never unmute it while it's going on if you're not a part of the case. You have to keep your phone on mute. So, I prefer that people just don't even go and watch and wait for the recording to come out just so mistakes can't happen, you know, because if it's so important and the public does have an interest in the case, but if some idiot who can't figure out the mute button screws it up for everybody else, >> that's why you if you are if you're going to watch something, make sure that beforehand you show up early.
You make sure that you are muted. You don't have to be on camera. You don't have to do anything. Just make sure you're not there. You know, it's it's very simple. So, you know, if you are going to be um observing something for real, I mean, you you can do damage. You can do damage on accident.
>> On accident, but also bad actors can do it on purpose.
>> Yeah. Yeah.
>> That's what I was also thinking too is like, well, how do we know that those those alleged unmutings >> they weren't herself, you know, just causing chaos to try and get it closed.
>> True. That is true.
>> Yeah. Yeah. So, I will if uh Rogue's working on it if she pulls up a couple of things. Um Yeah, Rogue, that's great.
Search for No, no, no. In the transcript. She says that so many times.
No, no, no, no. Stop. It's so funny. Oh god. And she gets she gets wild. Um yeah, it's good. All right, let's start reading this. Rogue's going to pull up a couple of timestamps and I'll show you guys a couple of examples, but one of these days we got to we got to do the whole we got to watch it. It is It's great. All right, so Leslie puts this in today.
Defendant Leslie Fertogos's motion to determine question of law >> motion, sorry, and request for dismissal of plaintiff's motion to declare defendant of vexacious litigant. Well, just so you guys know, if you're if you're new here and you're just catching up, we h have sued this person, Leslie Fertoigos, and her stupid husband, Michael, uh, for suing us vexaciously and, um, >> multiple times, by the way, >> maliciously. She sued us twice, dismissed it twice, and under the two dismissal rule in Florida, that means we got an adverse ruling. Uh, she got an adverse ruling, so we win. And then we got to file for um uh um what? Malicious prosecution. But we also filed a motion to have her declared a vexacious litigant because that's what she does.
So we have now it's funny as I read this today I'm like wait a minute didn't she already do this?
>> Yeah. Yeah. When I looked at this I was like wait what now? She did what? What now?
>> Yeah. Uh she she did this again. This isn't this is the second time she's putting something like this on the record. Again, proving to the judge that she's a vexacious filer. Like this is frivolous. This is the definition of frivolous. She already filed something exactly like this, but she's repackaging it in a way where she can ask for a hearing before the hearing. Okay, here we go. Comes now. defendant Leslie Fertoigo's prosay pursuant to rule blahy blah all the words uh that you need to use in the beginning and respectfully moves this honorable court to determine the following question of law priority here I missed uh legal vices going comes now defendant Leslie Ferrigo's pro pursuant to rule 1.100B Florida rules of civil procedure he used to do that all the time it was funny uh hearing any evidence >> person was a real lawyer at one time too, folks.
>> Yeah, a real lawyer, which you know, she probably should never have been given her license.
>> That is scary.
>> Uh blah blah blah to determine the following question of law prior to hearing any evidence on the plaintiff's amended motion. So, judge, don't hear any evidence about Leslie being a vexacious litigant here. Just decide my mo my motion first.
Isn't that crazy? I mean, >> she said an evidentiary hearing. So the judge, you already know what the judge wants. Why would you do this? I mean, you keep proving that you're a bigious litigant.
I know. I know. But she continues to do it. She continues to do it. Uh, so she wants a hearing before any of our evidence is put on declaring her a vexacious litigant. And as grounds therefore states, this motion seeks a ruling that as a matter of law, the version of 68.093 of Florida statute in effect prior to July 1st, 2025 governs the determination of vexacious litigant status in this case because all relevant filings by defendant Leslie Ferrigos occurred before that date. Where have we heard this before? Oh, you mean her motion to dismiss and plaintiffs have failed to allege or establish the statutory prerequisites under the controlling version of 68.093.
Specifically, that defendant has commenced, prosecuted, or maintained five or more civil actions as stat statutoily defined in the preceding 5-year period that were finally and adversely determined against her.
Two, legal argument. Do you want to read this, Todd? Or is the screen too small?
I can keep going if you don't have it open.
>> Oh my god, it's tiny. I can't. It is tiny.
>> Wait, where are we at? A >> uh the top A. Yeah.
>> Yeah. The court must apply the version of 68.0 93 in effect at the time of the subject filing. It is well settled under Florida law.
Well settled indeed. Right. that statutes are presumed to operate respectively unless legislature has clearly expressed an intent for retroactive application blah blah blah blah blah the amendment >> but here's what I don't understand is she really thinks that if we file after the law has changed and there's a seven look back period >> she really thinks that she has to have done the things from the time the law was put into place >> yes apparent currently she thinks that if you're so if there's a so let's let's just say bank robberies let's let's go with anything right there was no rule on bank robberies and um suddenly we put in some rules about bank so bank robberies before this rule on bank robberies were totally okay you know it didn't matter stealing that money was good to go you think that's how they meant that is that really what you think >> yeah it's crazy >> it's so dumb >> I'm sorry chat a bunch of you are sad about Jeff because I brought that up.
But it was funny when he used to do that, isn't it? I can still hear Jeff in my head. I Jeff lives in my head, so sometimes those things just come out because well, he's always here.
>> Your friend, you're allowed to talk about your friend. And >> I know, I know, but it makes people sad and I get it. But, you know, I really miss Jeff. And uh but you know you you you miss people because they bring value you know and uh you didn't it's not that you lost value it's that um you remember value so you know it isn't just >> yeah I'm going to continue talking about Jeff for the rest of my life mostly. So yeah it's going to happen it's going to happen. But the amended version of effective July 1st, 2025 contains no express language or retroactivity.
Retroactive application would impair vested rights, violate due process. The relevant actions by defendant Lesie Ferto Ricos predate the amendment and prior version of the statute must control blah blah or blah plaintiffs have not met the statutory prerequisites under you know what's really funny is um yeah if you count there's a lot of cases let's just say that Under da da da pre July 1st vexacious litigant is defined as a person who in the immediate preceding 5-year period has commended prosecuted or maintain proay five or more civil actions excluding family law in small claims which have been finally and inversely determined against the plaintiffs only allege three civil actions and improperly include family law and guardianship matters. She's like, "You can't include you can't talk about when uh I over and over and over again." Actually, you know what? They can indeed. Even if you were 100% right in there, you know, there's another portion of this. It's the judge's discretion. The judge has the ability to dis for discretion to look at anything they want to. of course because you you have to know that they interpret the intention of the law as well. So they have to they know what the intention of the Supreme Court was when they put this into um into place in Florida and they did it specifically or the I mean the legislature because the Supreme Court had basically lobbyed the lawmakers to say we need stronger vaccious litigant rules and um because of stuff like this and because they wanted to be able to have a wider discretion, right to look at these things as a whole and say, "Yeah, this person's a problem."
And there have been some doozies out there. I was I was doing some research about, you know, famous vexacious litigants. And I found this one. If you guys ever want a uh a crackup, uh something to read about that's that will make you laugh. Um there is a guy named what's his name? uh Anthony Martin Traona, who is a legend in the vacious litigant uh category.
And he had not only sued pretty much anyone who ever disagreed with him, but he would then sue their family members, he would sue the judges that ruled adversely against him, he would sue the any lawyer who came up against him. He even one time sued a lawyer who um was the one to put forward the opposing attorney's proh hot >> be chase.
>> Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. So the if I'm reading this correctly, the amended law, she's depending on the older law for what qualifying actions are. When she says that family cases don't count, what I'm reading here is that it looks like it uh looks at small claims, family law, probate rules, everything. It's all >> she's just lying. She's just lying.
>> I mean, she's just, you know, but she's >> she's just flat out misleading the court.
>> That it's amazing. Well, she's going by the old standard.
>> Yeah. What was 68? What was it? 093.
>> Yeah.
>> Is that the new one or the old one? Um, that's the new Well, it's it's a new here. Let me God dang it. Give me a second.
>> She wants to go by the old one, which is >> go by the old rules. But see, here's the problem. We filed after that date. So, it qualifies. See, her argument is trash because she's saying the stuff I did happened before this specific date.
That's not what it >> That's not how it works.
>> That's not how it works. It's based on I believe it's based on um when it's filed, but even then if the law changes and the case is still ongoing, you can make a motion to use the updated law.
>> Duh.
I I can't imagine why you wouldn't, >> right?
>> He seems ridiculous. It's a ridiculous argument, you know.
>> So, at the very top of 68.093, 093. It says that the law is governed by Florida family law rules of procedure. So why wouldn't family law apply?
Why wouldn't family law cases apply?
>> Well, you have to >> family law rules are cited.
>> It expanded the definition of action. So action is meant to govern Yeah. by Florida law. uh rules of procedure, rules of civil proceed, you know, just like again, look at the the way it's it's noting in there probate. So, yeah, if it's looking at all of family law rules of small claims, so it it defines action, it it ex it expressly added on like if you look at the old one, it did not, but they widened it, you know?
I'm asking AI something because I bet she's just misleading the court as usual.
Um the change.
Okay. So after 2025, the law expressly includes family law.
>> Yes. So >> but she's saying you can't include it before then. Yeah. Look, you she has on her problem is going to be this. She on record has talked about how she files garbage lawsuits. She also I mean we are talking about a dis well >> let me let me rephrase what I was going to say a person that is no longer a lawyer because well they were going to definitely have some problems and they decided to give it up versus you know >> well it seems to me that I don't think she's going to be able to prevail here the the case is still ongoing >> to pretend into her past conduct never happened, >> right? She wants to go on the old reading of the law, which did exclude family law cases, but not anymore. And I I can't for the life of me figure out why an ongoing case shouldn't be measured by the current law.
>> Why wouldn't a statute use historical facts to determine a president's status?
>> Right?
That's typical, you know, >> right?
>> Yeah.
>> Because I mean, typically, even if you were saying, okay, well, this under that's what they do. They look at conduct that predates statutes when they they look when they check a look back period because they look at things like habitual offenders. You know what what's interesting is again licensing and more.
I mean, she also she has other problems.
This person isn't filing lawsuits as a lawyer anymore because um well, their status, even their status is misleading. Everything in what they do is misleading.
Oh, it'll be interesting to see what happens.
>> So, I wanted to read guys a a paragraph of this. What?
>> I'm gonna text you. I can't say it out loud. Just go ahead and read and I'll take >> I want Why can't I remove this from the screen? What the hell?
Hold on. This is annoying. All right, I have to refresh the studio. I will be back.
She She had the Well, at least you refresh fast under this thing. You know, you can actually get it. Well, I say that and then she's going 12 days away.
But no, it's funny because she's she's trying to say, "Oh, during this look back time, you can't you can't do this."
You know what's funny is there are a lot of other cases, too. Leslie, you forgot.
You forget what's there.
>> For sure. I'm having such a hard time with the studio tonight. It's just being so buggy. Okay, so I wanted to read this to you because it's funny. This is about that uh Martin Traona guy who was a famous uh vexacious litigant in Connecticut.
But tell me if this doesn't remind you of a couple of people in this story.
Listen to this.
There are however several features that Mark Martin Traona's latigiousness as truly distinctive. First, he has had the benefit of legal training which education he has abused but not ignored.
Familiar as he is with the workings of court and agency, Martin Traona is far better situated to subvert those processes through calculatedly irregular filings than is the ordinary prosay suitor. Hm. Who does that sound like?
>> Indeed.
>> At the same time, Martin Traona is not, of course, a member of the bar. Many of his actions and much of his conduct if undertaken by an attorney would most likely result in disciplinary proceedings. But such a sanction is not available in Martin Traona's case.
Second, it is clear that Martin Traona is not interested in the vindication of some legal right. He does not present the court with case of a litigant whose claims, however fanciful or improbable, derived from an eccentric but good-faith interpretation of the law. On the contrary, the very purpose of Martin Traona's litigation is nothing other than the multiplication of litigation and the harassment of his imagined enemies and remarkably even those having any remote connection with these enemies. You mean like people on Facebook?
>> Remember when she wanted to sue 10 John Doe's on Facebook?
>> Just random names online. By the use of legal processes, his career in court establishes that for him legal trouble is a veritable sport and a means of making life challenging and enjoyable.
The a malign virtuoso of prosay litigation. Martin Tona is apparently stimulated by the prospect of drawn out controversy in complex filings.
>> That's hilarious.
>> That's paint chips to a tea.
>> That is it is very much it. I can't believe he hasn't been hit with something like this yet, you know.
>> Well, if he had the, you know, that that's another thing with Letho and if they were dealing with other, you notice other courts have gotten real sick of these people.
>> They really should.
>> They should get sick of them. The way they behave is unbelievable.
>> Yeah. I mean, they should be handled in their business, but unfortunately, >> they don't.
>> So, this case is crazy. If you guys want to read up on uh Martin Traona, his his uh career is legendary and he did get slapped with being um declared a vexacious litigant.
>> He deserved it.
>> But I mean, but not until he ruined the lives of hundreds of people. See, this is the thing. It takes way too long >> y >> to get a handle on some of these people and what they do. And that is our hope obviously with this um lawsuit that we put a stop to what Leslie is doing which is tanamount to what Martin Traona had had done. And um she did it to a lot of people before we started uh before we got involved in this. All right. So where were we? Um I think we were at Is this my P? This is still your page, I think. Plaintiffs only allege.
>> Uh, plaintiffs only allege three civil actions and improperly include family law, guardianship matters, which are expressly excluded by the statute definition, which they are not. No court has made a final or adverse determination against defendant in the three-sided civil matters. Most weren't dismissed voluntarily or without prejudice or defendant was represented by counsel. Uh yeah, no, she keeps playing the the whole uh I didn't do nothing wrong.
>> Yeah, of course.
>> Uh and then where this is the request for relief wherefore defendant Leslie Fertoigos respectfully requests that this honorable court determine as a matter of law that the pre July 1st version of 68.093 093 Florida statute applies to plaintiff's amended motion to declare defendant of xacious litigant and two find that plaintiffs have failed to allege or establish the statutory prerequisites for such a designation as only three civil actions are cited and no final and adverse determinations have been made and three dismiss plaintiff's amended motion to declare defendant of vexacious litigant without further evidentiary hearing.
>> Yeah. She doesn't want us to be able to talk.
>> She wants to shut us down. Yeah. And grant any other relief that this court deems just and proper.
>> It's absolutely absurd. And >> crazy.
>> Damn it. I was not added to the screen again. Okay.
All right. Yeah, it's crazy. It's crazy.
All right. It is crazy.
All right. Let's see what we got going on over on the YouTubes on the super chat side. We've got Max with a dollar.
Thank you very much. And Jagger over on Rumble gifted five memberships to the Fox Den. Welcome to the Fox Den. All five of you. It's weird here, but you'll get used to it. And if you don't, I'll just send you over to Just Jip where he will bother you with his terrible voice.
John Sclavani, thanks for the 20 here.
Money for your settlement to Tug.
Miss Patty, thanks for the five for Tug's frivolous lawsuit response. Yes, thank you. I'm going to need that because, you know, I'm going to counters sue him for frivolous litigation for sure. Busy horse, thanks for the five.
Use the medical term morbidly obese. It sounds way worse than fat.
Maestro, thanks for the two. Here's $2 in pennies to throw a tug.
Emil, thanks for the two. House of Fizzy to house dudes. D Green, thanks for the two. Says maybe you can bribe Tug to settle.
>> You know, I'm >> Would you take your settlement in uh would you take your settlement in leg warmers?
>> Maybe. You know, I am allergic to getting hit with pennies, though. I might have to to sue for allergy shots.
>> Oh god, here we go. Just adding damages now.
>> Cynth, >> thanks for the two. Lisa needs legal fees to quash Ry's subpoena. Oh lord.
But yet she's still she's still raising money from for my fake lawsuit, I guess.
>> So they were talking about um they were talking about how uh copyright actually works the other night, by the way. Last night.
>> Oh, yeah.
>> That was really funny, you know. Yeah.
They were telling us all about how copyright matters and and um if you're a journalist and you're covering a story like paint chips, then uh you are covered 100%.
>> Oh, really? That's weird.
>> Yeah, >> that's weird because they don't like that for anyone else.
>> Well, it's really funny when you go through and you uh you like, man, they just made Megan's argument for her. Good job. That's great. Thanks.
>> Y >> Karen S, by the way, >> you sent what?
>> I sent that transcript to you, by the way.
>> Oh, good. Okay. Yeah, I got it. Uh Karen, thanks for the 20 says, "Have a great week." Well, I appreciate that. I hope you do as well. We are going to move. We're moving over to Rumble now.
Please, folks over there on Rumble, please uh easy on the green flashing lights because we do have some people who have epilepsy and it does cause it triggers their seizures. So, uh it would be nice of you not to use those. Um otherwise, you know, be warned. This is when the emojis emojis usually go wild.
All right, we're headed over to Rumble and when we get there, we are going to watch Gab's arrest and we're going to force Tug to pay attention this time because it is so funny and he missed it last time while he was writing Nasty Grams.
>> Yeah, well, >> we didn't get very far anyway. We really didn't. We only got like 10 minutes in.
>> I got distracted. I had to write some angry letters, but this time I'm good. I I'm setting my phone aside. I'm telling you.
>> Okay.
>> All right. Those of you on the replay, check the comments. I will pin the Rumble link to the top of the comments.
I am also going to pin it in the chat at the top, which I don't have Rumble open.
Why don't I have it open? That's weird.
I'm going to pin it to the top of the chat as we speak.
If my Rumble would open. Yeah, that would be helpful. Thank you, Rumble. All right, I'm copying that now. And I am going to move it over there. Uh let me actually before we move over there, let me check my DMs from Rogue and see if she gave me any timestamps because if she did, we will watch a couple of those first and then we will head over to Rumble. Rumble link is going in the chat right now. Paste.
There we go. And I am replacing the pinned link.
Uh replace pinned. Okay, that is done.
Now, let me check Rogue's messages.
See if she got me those timestamps because my god, you guys. You've never heard anybody angrier than this uh in a hearing. So funny. So freaking funny. All right.
Excellent. Okay, she did. She gave me some. Oh my god, Rogue, you gave me so many. This is amazing. I Okay. Yeah, the Macy's bill is amazing. So, one of the things that we were trying to figure out in the whole Laura Owens debacle thing was they had this um GoFundMe that her dad, Ron Owens, who was a famous San Francisco uh radio talk show host. They put up a GoFundMe in the middle of Laura's legal troubles, claiming that his medical expenses were so grand uh that they needed help there. Even though he was one of the highest paid highest paid radio DJs in or radio talk show hosts in the country, uh he was worth something like 20 million or something.
>> Wow. that they had they still needed money to pay these medical bills and they um yeah so which of course we're going to find out though and every we were always like we don't think that's what they're pay using it for.
They're using it to pay Laura's attorneys for sure. Like for sure because she had all these legal she was suing everybody. She had attorneys blah blah blah. We figured they were using that money to give to Laura. Well, it gets even worse. We find out that they were using the money um to pay uh credit bills at luxury department stores.
>> That's crazy.
>> Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. So, let's see.
Meeting of the creditors.
Uh this would be July 16th.
All right. Here we go.
Oh my god. What is happening with my freaking mouse? Okay, there. All right, let's share this.
Get over here.
All right, here we go.
There. All right, 28.
Here we go.
This is going to be questioning about the GoFundMe. So again, keep in mind folks, this is about fundraising.
fundraising while you are at the same time or shortly thereafter declaring bankruptcy.
This is going to be very similar to what happens when it all comes out about the fundraiser for the barnaminium.
Think about that >> you thought it was the opportunity to u continue to pay for food and and basic expenses.
Well, like for example, >> one of the credit cards that you deemed it necessary to generate funds from a donation through GoFundMe was Macy's.
You thought it was essential to get donations to pay your Macy's bill.
>> That's amazing.
>> Um, we also >> I'm asking No, no, no, no. Hold on. You have to answer my questions, Miss Naylor. I am asking you, did you think it was necessary to ask for donations through GoFundMe to pay a Macy's credit card bill?
>> We didn't ask for donations to GoFundMe to pay a Macy's bill. No, we did not.
>> However, that's what you However, that's what you used. Hold on. However, >> you admit that you used GoFundMe funds to partially pay a to pay a Macy's credit card bill.
>> No.
No, we had pension and social security money. We had pension and social security money that also came in that month that would have been used to to pay a Macy's bill of whatever it would have been. I I have no idea what it would have been, but not not a sizable amount. We did have >> But she put it on. Now, you have to understand that that she put it on her list of expenditures that she paid out of the GoFundMe.
She put it on there. Okay, so that's just a and this goes on and on for a while. For a while. Um, but let's see. Uh, Rogue picked out a couple of others. Let's let's look at a couple of these because they're all great. I mean, it's all great. 40 20 or 40. Okay, hold on. 40 40.
All right, there we go.
>> Medical challenge with many of them.
>> Okay, but don't you wouldn't you agree though that by mentioning all of Mr. Owen's medical ailments, the implication was that it would be was going to be the money was needed to help fund health and medical expenses. Crazy.
>> Would you agree with that? Yes or no?
>> No.
>> Okay. No.
>> Okay, that's fine. That's enough. You don't need to explain. You don't need to >> Do you think that's like Well, wait a minute. You were raising money for a barn project, right?
>> Well, no. No, it was uh for to use for whatever I wanted, but on it, right?
>> I wasn't raising money for anybody. That was actually for me. Wait.
>> Yeah. Wait, what? I mean, she nails her on the language of the Oh, one of the parts that I was dying about, and I don't think she's got it marked in here, but at the beginning, she asked, "Who wrote the GoFundMe language?" And Jan says, "A friend of mine." And she says, "What friend?" Well, they don't want to be involved. And she said, "Well, that's too bad. I'm sorry they don't want to be involved, but now they are involved, and I want to know who it is." And she won't tell them. She says, "Well, it's me. I did it." She says, "Are you just telling me? You just said somebody else wrote it. Now you're saying you wrote it.
Well, my the people who were involved don't want to be involved. I mean, it was unbelievable.
This woman is going to end up getting herself thrown in jail.
>> This is so combative. It's amazing.
>> Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. No. 40. This is an amazing part. You want to hear combative? You want to hear combative?
Oh, it's about to get wild up in here, folks. Wild. get the the nuts and bolts on the on the GoFundMe. I can, you know, I I just again I just I think that that you know that there are people on the line who are um >> All right, enough. I can't miss Miss Miss Naylor. No, I'm not going to allow you to use this as a platform to just start going off. No, stop. I had asked very specific question. I are you going I I want to at least have you admit that you provided me with a document that you titled accounting of GoFundMe funds.
Will you admit that?
>> Yes.
>> Okay.
>> Yes.
>> All right. And among the other items that you list is that you used funds to pay for ADT home security. Correct.
>> Correct.
>> And was that something that helped alleviate Mr. Owen's medical struggles?
Well, we have had threats on our life.
>> The answer is yes or no. Did that alleviate Mr. Owen's medical struggles by using GoFundMe funds to pay for ADT home security system?
>> Well, we have medical uh we have a medical alarm on there. Yes. So that uh so that if we need to to uh contact medical services, we can contact them through the ADT system. Yes. And in fact, the night before last, I had to I had to >> Okay, I don't need to know about the night before last. That's okay. Please.
>> Oh crap. This >> I don't need to know about that. Uh 50.
Let's see. We're going to go to 50.
Oh, wait.
>> That's brutal, man.
>> Oh, I know. Oh, then the life insurance.
Oh my god.
She asks about what else they paid for.
She paid for life insurance, but she didn't pay for her mortgage. She's like, "So, let me get this straight. You thought you deemed life insurance payments were more important than paying the mortgage on the home you live in."
And basically, Jan's like, "Yeah, it was a 30-year, you know, life insurance. It I couldn't let it lapse." Yeah. Because she's counting on that money when Ron kicks it.
>> Yep.
>> And she doesn't care whether the bank has to eat the mortgage on the house.
>> What a statement there.
>> Oh, yeah. You guys, it's so wild. And there's so much more, but we are going to head over to Rumble now. Uh, I just wanted you to hear a little bit of that because >> have to go over that.
>> It's wild, Tug. It's one of the wildest things I've ever heard. I It's And it gets It's even It's even better than that. I mean, she nails her down and backs her into several corners that she cannot get out of. And I know that that's what's going to happen uh in Lynette's bankruptcy case. Eventually, she's going to run into this. Yep.
>> We're going over to Rumble now, folks.
Do not miss it. The show is not over.
It's just over here on YouTube. Good night to everybody on YouTube. You'll have a couple of minutes to get on over to Rumble and I will see you there.
Let's get ready to rumble.
>> Anyone can understand that.
>> Unless you're a clown loser.
>> Share this everywhere, too, because this is fun.
>> Fun times indeed.
>> All right.
Because this Oh, this is fun times. This is fun times indeed. 100% fascinating.
>> And don't forget professional.
>> All right.
Are you still here? Get going. You're not going to want to miss what's next because this is when, well, >> everything pops off. Truly intense buzz.
>> So, click the link, join us on Rumble.
Hey.
Hey. Hey.
Heat. Heat.
Related Videos

Session 5: Law, Genomic Medicine & Health Equity Conference/Webcast -- Dr. Consuelo Wilkins
UMNconsortium
234 views•2019-01-02

Consider This: ICJ Climate Ruling — Holding Nations to Account
astroawani
307 views•2025-08-11

The Third Gender I Legal Recognition of Intersex Community
KBCChannel1News
259 views•2023-07-09

What Are Proceedings In Court? - CountyOffice.org
CountyOfficeLaw
129 views•2025-03-06

Understanding the EU Electronic Evidence Package | Interview with Cristos Velasco | EP 7
DejanKosutic
816 views•2025-04-22

8 Violations in ONE Day? Judge West Gives Ultimate Wake-Up Call
LawAndLogicTV
263 views•2026-04-26

United States v. Navajo Nation Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
QuimbeeDotCom
589 views•2023-09-21

Young Professionals: CPR Part 36 Offers with Harry Dyson
kingschambers4859
902 views•2024-04-30
Trending

One Must Imagine Sisyphus Happy
vlogbrothers
61K views•2026-07-21

Future of Taylor Farms
maighstirtarot5385
11K views•2026-07-21

The Downfall of OnePlus!
techwiser
65K views•2026-07-21

My Friend Locked Up The Engine On His K-Swapped Bug...
boostedboiz
128K views•2026-07-21