Court Rejects Sovereign Citizen’s LLC Defense During Probation Hearing!

[00:00:00][music] [music] Welcome to solvent citizen encounters.

[00:00:08]All right, today we have a solvent citizen who's in for a probation revocation hearing. Now, he's going to have to get on the stand and testify a little bit because it's going to be cross-examined, but you're going to hear some of the things he's going to be saying. And you're also going to hear some of the things the judge is going to be saying. And also, I have two other hearings. So, we're going to escalate it today because this hearing is a little calm. The second hearing has a little bit more to it. And the third hearing definitely have something you're going to be happy about. So let's go in and check it out. Let's go.

[00:00:34]>> Landro Vastitech 25mm2298.

[00:00:44]Mr. Bost is here. It was scheduled for a probation violation hearing on the 9:00 docket.

[00:00:53]Uh Mr. Bostonite. I know part of the different discussions we've had about the case was that you were going to hire an attorney or apply for the public defender?

[00:01:01]>> Do you know? Um, good morning. And I'm a pering proay.

[00:01:05]>> Okay.

[00:01:05]>> Here today.

[00:01:06]>> Okay.

[00:01:09]>> You ready to proceed for a hearing, Mr. Vost?

[00:01:12]>> Yes, your honor.

[00:01:13]>> Okay. People ready?

[00:01:15]>> Uh, your honor, the people would like to call officer Zorb, please.

[00:01:17]>> Okay.

[00:01:23]You come on up to the witness stand, please.

[00:01:27]You raise your right hand. You swear affirm on a penalty of perjury the testimony about to give in. This matter will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

[00:01:34]>> Okay, go ahead and have a seat.

[00:01:41]>> Go ahead.

[00:01:42]>> Good morning.

[00:01:43]>> Good morning.

[00:01:44]>> Would you please state and spell your name for the record?

[00:01:46]>> Alexis. A L E X I S Zorb. Z O E RB.

[00:01:53]Miss Zorb, who is your employer?

[00:01:55]>> The 21st Judicial District Probation Department.

[00:01:58]>> And what is your occupation?

[00:01:59]>> I'm a probation officer.

[00:02:01]>> And how long have you worked there?

[00:02:03]>> Um, about a year and a half.

[00:02:05]>> And did you have Landro Vosetch as a client?

[00:02:08]>> I do.

[00:02:10]>> Uh, can you do you see him in the courtroom today?

[00:02:12]>> I do.

[00:02:13]>> Can you describe what he's wearing?

[00:02:15]>> A blue button-up collared shirt.

[00:02:17]>> Can you describe where he's sitting?

[00:02:19]>> Right over there. Uh, can you describe his hair color? I >> I don't think identity is really an issue on a PV complaint. I know who Mr. Vostc is.

[00:02:27]>> Oh, thank you, your honor.

[00:02:28]>> You're welcome.

[00:02:30]>> Was he your client in Mesa County, Colorado?

[00:02:33]>> Yes, he is.

[00:02:34]>> Your honor, may I approach?

[00:02:35]>> Yes.

[00:02:39]>> Do you recognize what I handed you?

[00:02:41]>> I do.

[00:02:42]>> What is it?

[00:02:43]>> It's his county court plea agreement.

[00:02:45]>> How can you tell?

[00:02:47]>> The title at the top.

[00:02:50]And to your knowledge, was Mr. Vosetch on supervised probation for 12 months?

[00:02:55]>> Yes, he is. Okay. Uh, would you say this is a fair and accurate representation of the plea agreement to the best of your knowledge?

[00:03:02]>> Yes, it is.

[00:03:04]>> Your honor, the people move to admit what has been marked as people's exhibit one.

[00:03:07]>> Do you have a copy for Mr. Bostonitech so he can see what the exhibit is?

[00:03:11]>> I do. Thank you for the reminder.

[00:03:15]>> Any objection, Mr. Vostate?

[00:03:18]No one's admitted.

[00:03:20]>> Your honor, may I approach again?

[00:03:21]>> Yes.

[00:03:22]>> Thank you.

[00:03:28]>> Well, actually, I I do, your honor, it appears that this is backdated a year.

[00:03:33]This plea agreement here.

[00:03:36]I am January 6, 2025.

[00:03:38]>> Yeah, it's 2026.

[00:03:42]>> What's that?

[00:03:42]>> It was supposed to be 2026, >> right?

[00:03:45]>> Not 25. So this is pretty much >> that goes towards its weight, not its admissibility. If there was a scrivener error on the creation of it by my plea agreement that I have in the file has um my signature is the date that it was accepted in the findings of the court as voluntary acceptance on January 6, 2026.

[00:04:06]>> That's it right there.

[00:04:07]>> As well as the rule 11 form that's attached to the play agreement.

[00:04:11]>> All right. It appears the district attorney also backdated it a year 1625.

[00:04:15]Yeah, they made a mistake, Mr. Bost. It wasn't It was a plea agreement that you entered on January 6th of 2026.

[00:04:23]>> Go ahead, Mr. Cross.

[00:04:24]>> There's another error right here. Also, >> uh again, you'll have the opportunity to cross-examine the witness.

[00:04:30]>> Oh, yeah. I was think on this.

[00:04:33]>> That's okay.

[00:04:35]>> Miss Or did I just hand you >> the sentencing order for the this case?

[00:04:41]>> Uh how do you know what it is?

[00:04:44]Um, it says sentencing order.

[00:04:47]>> Is your name on it?

[00:04:48]>> It is.

[00:04:49]>> Is this a standard sentence order form?

[00:04:51]>> It is.

[00:04:52]>> Uh, on page two, are those standard conditions of supervision?

[00:04:56]>> They are.

[00:04:56]>> And do you recognize Mr. Landro Vetek's initials in front of all of the conditions on page two?

[00:05:01]>> I do.

[00:05:02]>> What is condition number seven?

[00:05:04]>> That he will submit to drug and alcohol testing as directed by the probation officer. Okay.

[00:05:09]>> And is this sentencing order fair and accurate to the best of your knowledge?

[00:05:13]Yes, it is.

[00:05:14]>> Your honor, the people move to admit what has been marked as people's exhibit two.

[00:05:17]>> Do you have a copy for >> Yeah, I do. Okay.

[00:05:22]>> Any objection, Mr. Vos Detect?

[00:05:27]>> No. No objection.

[00:05:29]>> All right. Exhibit two is admitted.

[00:05:33]>> Your honor, may I approach again?

[00:05:34]>> Yes.

[00:05:34]>> Thank you.

[00:05:41]Do you recognize the allegations in the complaint that I handed you?

[00:05:45]>> I do.

[00:05:45]>> What are they?

[00:05:48]>> What are the counts?

[00:05:50]>> Yeah. Like what are the accusations in the counts or whatnot?

[00:05:52]>> That >> I can I can read the complaint. I don't need her to read it to me.

[00:05:55]>> Sure. Are those um are those allegations accurate to the best of your knowledge?

[00:05:59]>> Yes, they are.

[00:06:00]>> Your honor, are the people moved to admit people's exhibit three?

[00:06:03]>> Mr. house detect.

[00:06:07]Any objection to the admission?

[00:06:08]>> No objection, your honor.

[00:06:10]>> Exhibit 3 is admitted.

[00:06:14]>> Your honor, may I approach?

[00:06:15]>> Yes.

[00:06:15]>> I think this attorney like to walk back and forth.

[00:06:17]>> What did I just hand you?

[00:06:19]>> My narratives from the time I've worked with on this case.

[00:06:25]>> How do you recognize it?

[00:06:27]>> Um, I printed them and emailed them.

[00:06:30]>> Okay. And you wrote those narratives? I did.

[00:06:33]>> Okay. Uh, generally what probation violations are outlined within >> missing um his drug tests and failure to complete or comply with community service >> and are those accurate to the best of your knowledge and recollection?

[00:06:46]>> They are.

[00:06:47]>> What generally what conversations are outlined within >> that? I we do typical check-ins. Um talk about where he's living, what's going on, and then I'll direct him to go take a UA and start his community service hours.

[00:07:04]>> And does that report contain an accurate record of those conversations to best of your knowledge and recollection?

[00:07:10]>> It does. Okay.

[00:07:13]>> Your honor, the people move to admit uh people's exhibit four, Mr. F to take >> no objection before is admitted. Okay.

[00:07:29]>> Uh Miss Vositech did or sorry um Miss Zorb, did Mr. Vosetch miss uh any drug tests?

[00:07:37]>> Yes, he did.

[00:07:38]>> Okay. Uh did he complete his useful public service hours?

[00:07:41]>> He did not.

[00:07:42]>> And is that a violation of his uh probation?

[00:07:44]>> It is.

[00:07:46]>> Uh nothing further. Thank you, >> Mr. Boss. to tech. Any questions for Miss Zorb?

[00:07:52]>> You can either do it from the table in front of the microphone or the podium, whichever you prefer.

[00:07:58]>> No, I I don't have any questions.

[00:08:00]>> Okay.

[00:08:01]>> Forb.

[00:08:02]>> Thank you, Missor. You can have a seat.

[00:08:04]Do you have a copy of exhibit 4 for me?

[00:08:06]>> Oh, I have all the other ones. You can give those to me. Morb, >> thank you. Which was exhibit.

[00:08:14]>> Any other witnesses for the people?

[00:08:16]>> I'm sorry. Would you please repeat that?

[00:08:18]Any other witnesses for the people?

[00:08:24]>> Uh, your honor, the people would like to call Mr. Vosite.

[00:08:27]>> Okay, Mr. Bosch, if you can come on up to the podium or the witness chair, please just ask.

[00:08:35]>> Do you have >> just over there by the chairs here in front of a microphone?

[00:08:39]>> Okay, if you could raise your right hand, please. I swear affirm under penalty of perjury the testimony about to give in this matter will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

[00:08:48]have a seat. If he says no, then he might need it.

[00:08:55]>> Go ahead.

[00:08:56]>> Thank you.

[00:08:57]>> Good morning.

[00:08:58]>> Morning.

[00:08:59]>> Mr. Vetch, did you have a chance?

[00:09:00]>> Could you state your name and spell your last name for the record, please?

[00:09:04]>> Sure. Uh, Landro Vastitech.

[00:09:07]L I SA N D R O and V O S T A T E K.

[00:09:12]>> Thank you.

[00:09:15]>> Mr. Mr. Bosch, did you have a chance to review what was marked as People's Exhibit One or your plea agreement?

[00:09:20]>> I did. Okay.

[00:09:24]>> Did you sign that agreement?

[00:09:26]>> I did.

[00:09:27]>> Okay. And on that agreement, it required uh 12 months of supervised probation.

[00:09:33]>> It did.

[00:09:36]>> Did you get a chance to review what was marked as people's exhibit two or your sentence order?

[00:09:40]>> I did.

[00:09:42]On page two of that document, there were a list of uh terms of your probation.

[00:09:46]Did you see your initials on page two of that document?

[00:09:49]>> I did. Okay.

[00:09:55]>> And as part of that document, were you required to submit to regular drug testing?

[00:10:01]>> I did. Yeah.

[00:10:04]>> Did you report to drug testing on January 20th, 2026?

[00:10:08]>> I did not. What about on January 30th of 2026?

[00:10:12]>> It did not.

[00:10:13]>> February 17th of 2026?

[00:10:15]>> No.

[00:10:16]>> April 7th of 2026?

[00:10:18]>> No.

[00:10:19]>> May 12th of 2026?

[00:10:21]>> No.

[00:10:23]>> Did you complete any useful public service hours?

[00:10:26]>> No.

[00:10:26]>> Okay.

[00:10:27]>> Nothing further. Thank you.

[00:10:28]>> He hasn't done anything.

[00:10:29]>> Mr. Vstatechuck, any testimony based upon those questions?

[00:10:33]>> Um, yes. Can I grab my papers? Right.

[00:10:38]>> Sure. Yeah, that's fine. Yep.

[00:10:41]>> So, um uh I'm pleading not guilty, um to this probation revocation complaint in case number 2025M2298.

[00:10:54]I filed an e emergency motion to dismiss under the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine at the clerk's counter this morning. And I have a date stamped copy here for the record. Um, so this probation status is built on a void foundation proven by the court's own minute order from August 26 of 2025.

[00:11:14]Uh, the first involuntary detention and uh the denial of due process. The minute order logs me as a failure to appear, but simultaneously notes I was detained in this building by the sheriff's office on a warrant. Proceeding exparte [snorts] while knowing I was held in custody inside the building is a direct deprivation of due process. That is the primary poisoned tree. Second, unauthorized practice of law. Well, that same minute order shows non- attorney Ian Gershman represented an LLC proay under CRS uh 13-1-127, a non- attorney cannot represent a corporate entity, rendering the underlying judgment void abinio and um under the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine, the probation revocation in case number 2025M2298 is constitutionally tainted fruit. I demand this court dismiss the revocation complaint immediately or stay these proceedings until I am provided 100% proof of jurisdiction to proceed.

[00:12:17]>> Thank you, Mr. Bost. Anything else?

[00:12:20]>> No, that's it, your honor.

[00:12:22]>> Okay, >> you can have a seat, Mr. Bost.

[00:12:25]>> Thank you.

[00:12:30]>> Any other witnesses or evidence from the people?

[00:12:32]>> Nothing further, your honor. Thank you, >> Mr. Fostch. Other than your testimony in response to the direct examination, any other witnesses or evidence?

[00:12:40]>> No, your honor.

[00:12:41]>> Okay.

[00:12:43]Mr. Bos, any further argument from you other than what you've indicated you filed today?

[00:12:49]>> No, your honor.

[00:12:50]>> Okay.

[00:12:53]Quote made the following findings of fact and conclusions of law relative to the amended complaint that's been filed in the case. Uh the court finds that based upon his own admission, Mr. Boston Techch did not participate in testing on January 20th, which is count one, January 30th, which is count two, February 17th, which is count three, hasn't completed useful public service hours as is reflected in count four, did not participate in testing on April 7th, which is count five, or May 12th, which is count six.

[00:13:25]The crown notes that I have that indicated the last communication June 16th again indicated he's not completed or signed up for any UPS hours.

[00:13:39]Um did not address or direct defendant PO did not address or direct the defendant take a UA during apartment um um which Mr. Bastitech is clearly not going to take anyway. Mr. Boss detects response to the amended complaint. Does it indicate that um nobody had something about legal authority regarding the arrest? A warrant was issued on April 20 or August 26, 2025. He was detained on the warrant seen on videos and on August 27th, 2025 and given a personal recognance bomb by me to get out of jail, which is where uh he got credit for one day served from uh being remanded uh at the courthouse and then let go. Uh Mr. Bostonitech um during the inquiries of the court on the plea agreement on January 6, 2026, he correctly points out that both he and the DA signed it is 2025. What I go by as well is when I write down that there was a knowing voluntary waiver of rights and entry of a plea was the correct date of January 6th of 2026, which is also reflected in the register of actions in the minute orders from my courtroom on January 6, 2026. there wasn't a claim at that time that it was an improper year or that it wasn't him or that it wasn't signed on that particular day. What is common in court filings is that most people about January 6 forget to continue to write things for 2026 and do the previous year. So, it's not uncommon to do that.

[00:15:10]But that does not void the plea agreement, the obligations, and the sentence that was imposed as is reflected in the terms and conditions of probation. Uh that was filed by probation on January 16, 2026 and ordered as a court order on February 4th, 2026.

[00:15:29]Uh Mr. Detect has violated the terms and conditions of probation as was reflected in the um amended complaint which is sustained by the court. Um any sentence recommendations, Mr. cross >> there was something not right >> I'll just broken >> for for the findings of the court anyway the I haven't seen the pleading if it was filed this morning Mr. Boston Tech.

[00:15:54]I'll look at it when it gets to me. Even though it's filed in the clerk's office for your benefit, it goes through a clerk review in the clerk's office to make sure it's the right case number assigned to the right division and then it's forwarded to my inbox once it passes that. So, something filed in the morning doesn't technically get to my inbox until probably the afternoon of that day. Uh my clerks can go in and do clerk review into clerk review and send it to me uh directly. But something that's filed this morning, particularly before a 9:00 hearing, would not be in my inbox for me to review. I'd note that the arguments that you have or that you've discussed here are the same arguments that you've been filing with the court under some misnomer of some corporate entity under an LLC, which is the same sovereign citizen gibberish I've been dealing with for 19 and a half years. Okay. Uh, so I'll deal with the motion when I see it, when it's provided to me, but it does not void the obligations that you have on probation, the sentence that I impose and the requirement to do not only UAS uh, but also useful public service. Anything, Mr. Cross?

[00:16:59]>> Uh, yes, your honor. Uh, our office had a chance to talk to, uh, Miss Zorb and she thought that direct jail would be appropriate. Um, given that probation is not working, she recommended 45 days of direct jail and I believe that would also be appropriate. uh revoke and end with that jail term.

[00:17:15]>> Okay.

[00:17:16]>> Thank you, >> Mr. Bostonitech. Any recommendations for sentencing?

[00:17:23][clears throat] >> Um yeah, just the reinstatement, I guess, of uh probation would be why what I would I would say. Well, >> are you going to do a UA? Are you going to do the useful public service?

[00:17:34]>> I I'll do them.

[00:17:36]>> How do I know that you're going to do them when you haven't done one of them since I placed you on probation in January?

[00:17:40]>> Cuz I'm looking you in the eye and telling you I'll do them. You're You're going to do them?

[00:17:43]>> I'll do them >> and the UPS hours.

[00:17:46]>> And the UPS hours.

[00:17:47]>> What I'll do is I'll order revoke and reinstate probation for a year with 90 days of direct jail suspended on the condition that you do the UAS and you successfully complete probation and and uh the useful public service hours. If I get a report to the court from Miss Zorb that you have not signed up for or started any useful public service hours in the next 30 days or deny or miss a UA, uh the report to the court will make it a 90-day direct jail sentence.

[00:18:16]>> Okay.

[00:18:16]>> Okay. So, if you do everything you have to, there's no jail. And I'll accept your word, Mr. Vost Detect. All right.

[00:18:23]>> Today, you're looking me in the eye. I'm looking you in the eye that if you do what you're supposed to do, you don't go to jail.

[00:18:29]>> All right.

[00:18:30]>> Okay.

[00:18:30]>> Yes, your honor. So, you need to meet with Miss Orb, go over those same terms and conditions. It's exactly what you signed uh when you met with her uh the beginning of the year. Um again, get the information directly from her as far as where you go or what you do to do the useful public service hours. I know in the past, Mr. Vast has had financial issues. It's reflected in the narratives about not being employed because he works to for his living um for the place that he lives. So, I'm fine with not or waving a UPS fee for Mr. Vast so that there's not a financial barrier for you doing the useful public service. Uh, since you live up on the mesa, do you still live up there, Mr. Vosite Tech?

[00:19:12]>> I do.

[00:19:13]>> Uh, that's something, Morba, as far as a nonprofit up there where you can do that. It's not my intent that you have to come down to Mesa County to work at Goodwill. My the intent of the community service is the benefit the community where you reside. So, I'm willing to be flexible on those things so that it's not a financial barrier and it's not a logistics barrier for you to do the useful public service, but my expectation is that Missou will file a report in 30 days that I get to read that says that you've signed up for UPS hours and you've complied with the UAS.

[00:19:44]>> Okay.

[00:19:45]>> Yes, anything else, Mr. Cross.

[00:19:48]>> Nothing further, your honor. Thank you.

[00:19:49]>> Okay. You get him back, Miss Zorp.

[00:19:53]Thank you, Mr. Vost.

[00:19:55]Appreciate your time. I'll review the motion that you filed when I get it.

[00:19:58]Okay.

[00:19:58]>> All right.

[00:19:59]>> I'll uh probably Mr. Cross, for your benefit, I'll let uh the DA file a response to it.

[00:20:05]>> So, the judge was nice enough to give him another chance. And I'm quite sure you probably wouldn't have done it, and I probably wouldn't have done it either.

[00:20:11]Anyway, we'll see what happens about him reporting. And the other thing I was looking at, the judge been on the bench 20 years and dealing with the sovereign citizens. And none of them won the case yet. I'm sure they haven't. Their stats are really bad. But anyway, we get ready to go into another hearing where I thought that I seen an offended with a whole bunch of charges in the past of videos I've covered here. But this guy, I think he gets the Academy Award for so many charges that he has. You'll see.

[00:20:39]Let's go on the record in state New Jersey versus Quinton C. Hunt. Mr. Hunt is here for a first appearance intent hearing on warrant 2026 2730102.

[00:20:49]Appearances of council starting with the state.

[00:20:51]>> Morning, your honor. Assistant prosecutor Capello for the state >> Holly Bters on behalf of Quenton Hunt.

[00:20:56]>> Okay. Good morning or good still morning. Good morning to both of you.

[00:20:59]Good morning, Mr. Hunt. So you've gone over his charges and first appearance rights. He understands both, Miss Bidters.

[00:21:04]>> He does, judge.

[00:21:05]>> Okay. We'll mark the first appearance complete. You've gone over his detentioning rights as well.

[00:21:09]>> Yes.

[00:21:10]>> Mark detentioning rights advising complete. Moving to what the court has in its file. The court has the complaint warrant package including the affatement of probable cause and the preliminary law enforcement report. We're marked that as S1. Mr. Capella. Yes, please.

[00:21:21]Judge >> one. The court also has the uh PSA, which has a four on the failure to appear scale, a five on the new criminal activity scale, a no release recommendation. I I'm going to have to have pre-trial services explain this one to me how it's not a 66, but we'll put that aside. You mark that as S2.

[00:21:36]>> Yes, please, judge.

[00:21:37]>> It's S2. And then I have the notice motion for pre-trial detention supporting certification. Mark that as S3.

[00:21:42]>> Yes, please, Judge.

[00:21:43]>> Yes, you want to mark.

[00:21:45]>> Nothing, judge.

[00:21:46]>> Move S13 and evidence.

[00:21:48]>> Yes, please, Judge. I guess one thrust three are in evidence. Any defense exhibits?

[00:21:53]>> No. Thank you, judge.

[00:21:54]>> We think so, but we're moving along. So, probable cause stipulation, Miss Biders, >> we'll stipulate.

[00:21:58]>> The although the fence not contesting probable cause, the court still must make an independent determination regarding the issue of probable cause.

[00:22:04]United States Supreme Court has defined probable cause as a well-ground suspicion that an offense has been committed and a well-ground suspicion the defense one that committed it.

[00:22:11]That's Garcine versus Pew 420 US 1021 1974. See a probable cause in this case.

[00:22:15]Of course, they have the opportunity to review the complaint warrant package includes affidavit of probable cause and the preliminary law enforcement incident report which were marked and moved collectively into evidence as S1. Courts also take consideration there's a stipulation by between the parties of this hearing and this hearing only.

[00:22:29]Based on those things, the court finds the defendants elible offending committed the charge offenses at the probable cause or well-ground sedition level.

[00:22:36]Having failed probable cause, the court's going to move to the detention determination. Here there's a presumption of release the burden of proving detention by clear and convincing evidence. Uh PSA has no release recommendation. I understand that the the defense is consenting. Uh if that's the case, I can just move right into my ruling. Any objection, Mr. Capella?

[00:22:54]>> No objection, your honor.

[00:22:55]>> Miss biders.

[00:22:56]>> No objection, judge.

[00:22:58]>> Okay. Thank you. So before the say before the court is Quinton Hunt on warrant 2026 2730102.

[00:23:05]Sty filed a motion for pre-trial detenting hearing. The court again finds that saves established probable cause.

[00:23:11]the defendant is an eligible defendant committed the charge offenses at the probable cause or well-grounded suspicion level.

[00:23:18]That's based upon S1, which is the uh probable cause affidavit uh and the limited law enforcement incident report uh and the stipulation between the parties purpose and this area only. With regard to the detention determination, court notes it's by consent, but the court still must make independent findings. Court finds by clear convincing evidence that no amount of monetary bail, nonary conditions, or combination of monary bail conditions would usually assure defendants's appearance of court required and the protection of the safety of any other person in the community and the defendant will not obstruct or attempt to obstruct the criminal justice process and therefore pre-trial detention of the defendant is hereby ordered. In making that determination, the court considered each and every statuto factor and more.

[00:24:05]Court consider the nature and circumstance the offense is charged. Uh defendant has been charged with third degree knowingly using a stolen credit card, third degree knowingly receiving stolen property and third degree attempting to use a stolen credit card.

[00:24:17]The charges arose out of uh the facts that set forth in the affable cause which is incorporated by reference. At the time of defendant's arrest, the defendant had 51 pending charges which included multiple counts of burglary, theft, identity theft, credit card crimes, criminal trespass, and more. Defend had 18 prior disorderly persons convictions, which included multiple thefts, identity thefts, and criminal trespasses. Fenon had 68 prior indictable convictions for robbery, multiple burglaries, multiple thefts, multiple receiving stolen properties, multiple credit card crimes, multiple larsenies, and multiple escapes. I'm surprised he was on the street.

[00:24:56]>> That's the longest record I think I've ever seen. Uh it's unbelievable. Two defendants prior convictions in constitute violent crimes for robbery and armor burglary. Finn has tw 26 prior sentences of incarceration of more than 14 days, mostly in the New Jersey state prison. Fenn Curley is on probation. Not sure how he got probation. Fennet is uh essentially a walking crime spree at this point. Finn definely definitely represents a danger to persons and the community. Finn has escape and identity crime convictions. He seemingly has violated his probation. He clearly represents a risk to obstruct. Finn has six prior failures to appear. Defend has seven active warrants for his arrest when uh when he was arrested. Finn has a detainer when he was arrested. Uh defendant is a four and five as already stated. There's no release recommendation. The court gives it overwhelming weight with regard to the other factors. Court considered the way the evidence against the defendant including personal observations of law enforcement statements the witnesses the victim the witnesses uh statements of strike that video including body war camera footage surveillance camera physical evidence the wallet and credit cards.

[00:26:06]Court considered his history and characteristics. defend has an important prior criminal history with 68 indictable convictions, 18 disorderly pace person convictions, two violent convictions, 26 sentences of more than 14 days incarceration. He was on probation at the time of his arrest. He had 51 charges pending at the time of his arrest with six uh failures to appear, seven active warrants, and a detainer. There are no conditions.

[00:26:30]>> I'm surprised the judge is not out of breath. The defendant court consider his criminal history, his record of appearing at court, the fact he's on probation, fact he has 51 pending charges, his the dangerousness defendant represents a clear and present danger to persons in the community. Court said the nature and risk of obstruction here.

[00:26:49]Defendants on probation. He's been non complying. He's got prior escapes. Court considered the release recommendation gave a great weight. So overall there are no conditions whether they be monetary, non-monetary or combination of both that reasonably assure defendants appearance in court are required non-obstruction and safety courts states man by clear and convincing evidence.

[00:27:13]Defense hereby order detain in this matter. We can unmute the defendant for a moment.

[00:27:22]Mr. Hunt, you've been detained. I'm going to advise you that you have the right to have a reasonable opportunity to consult with your attorney. I'm also going to advise you that you have the right to appeal the court's order. That appeal would be to the appellet division. You have to file it within 7 days pursuant to rule 2913. You understand that?

[00:27:39]>> Yeah. What do you mean 51 can detain it?

[00:27:42]What are you talking about?

[00:27:43]>> It's not detainer, sir. You have seven You only have a couple detainers, but you have 51 pending charges.

[00:27:49]>> What do you mean 51 pending charges?

[00:27:51]>> Go over that with your attorney. That's how many charges you presently have? 52 now.

[00:27:59]Okay. 66 68 prior indictitable convictions, 18 disr persons convictions, etc., etc. Seven active warrants. So, >> where's the warrants at?

[00:28:11]>> Where's the warrants at? Where's the warrants at?

[00:28:14]>> I guess he been so many places he don't know who has warrants on them.

[00:28:17]>> Okay. The warrants are out of Not sure we have to have this discussion, but we're going to have it anyway because I I I like to answer defendants questions.

[00:28:24]So, the warrants are out of he failed to appear for court on June 23rd, 2026 in Essex County for burglary.

[00:28:33]June 23rd, 2026 in Essex County for criminal trespass. June 23rd, 2026 in Essex County for theft. These are separate cases. June 23rd, 2026 in Essex County for burglary. June 24th, 2026 in Living Livingston Township for theft, criminal trespass, credit card theft, credit card fraud, credit credit card fraud. May 16th, 2026 in Orange City for residential burglary and theft. July 3rd, 2026 in Atlantic City for credit card theft, receiving stolen property, receiving stolen property, and you had a detainer for uh attempt uh not sure where the detainer's out of.

[00:29:14]So, good luck, sir. You're excused. Ask the next person to come in. All right.

[00:29:25]I don't even know how he was out with all of that stuff he has going on. So, maybe he's been hiding for a while, but they got him now. And I'm sure he's not getting out anytime soon. All right. So, the last hearing I have is an example of how a judge should handle a courtroom when somebody tries to interrupt them.

[00:29:41]Now, I've seen comments where you say, "Well, you know, the judges need to get more control of the court, and when defendants go off, you wish you see the judge do something." Well, the judge is going to do something in this case.

[00:29:51]Let's go.

[00:29:52]>> What is your name?

[00:29:53]>> Robert Porric.

[00:29:55]>> This is Central Judicial Processing.

[00:29:57]This is your first appearance. I'm going to advise you of your charges and your rights. We have a couple matters to discuss. Sir, do you remember being in this court on >> Yes, sir.

[00:30:08]>> June 12th, 2026. Yes.

[00:30:11]>> You remember Judge Miola releasing you from jail?

[00:30:14]>> Yes.

[00:30:15]>> You remember him giving you conditions or some rules to live by?

[00:30:18]>> Yes.

[00:30:19]>> Do you understand everything he said?

[00:30:21]>> Yes.

[00:30:26]>> Then you >> I was told I'm allowed to >> stop talking. Stop talking. I ask the questions, you answer. That's the way it works. Is that clear?

[00:30:34]>> Yes, sir.

[00:30:35]>> Now, the reason I'm doing this is because apparently you weren't listening very well last time. So, I'm going to let you know what's going to happen if you don't listen to me this time. Is that clear enough?

[00:30:46]>> Yes, sir.

[00:30:47]>> It's cold in here.

[00:30:48]>> Good. Cuz apparently you don't listen.

[00:30:50]So, you're going to listen today.

[00:30:54]You were here on June 12th. You saw Judge Miola. He released you from jail.

[00:30:57]Correct.

[00:30:58]>> Correct.

[00:30:59]>> He gave you certain conditions to live by. Correct.

[00:31:02]>> Correct.

[00:31:03]>> Now, it's alleged that just 15 days later, you violated those conditions.

[00:31:08]You saw Judge Miola again and he released you again increasing your conditions. Correct.

[00:31:14]>> Yes, sir.

[00:31:15]>> Now, as if that wasn't enough, you then came back again and here you are because it's alleged you haven't satisfied the conditions.

[00:31:26]So, let's go over this. So, clearly we do understand. Do you understand by getting released from jail, you're not staying in jail?

[00:31:35]>> Yes, sir. Would you prefer to stay in jail?

[00:31:38]>> No.

[00:31:39]>> Because that can be arranged. Would you like us to arrange that?

[00:31:43]>> No, sir.

[00:31:44]>> Okay. So, now here's the rules to keep your behind out of jail. You are not to get rearrested for any reason. Is that somehow not clear?

[00:31:58]>> No, I understand.

[00:32:02]You were told that you couldn't have contact with a certain person, right?

[00:32:06]>> Correct.

[00:32:08]>> And if you did, that would violate the conditions of your release. Correct.

[00:32:12]>> Correct.

[00:32:12]>> Well, it's alleged that you violated that on numerous occasions. That's the allegation. Do you understand that?

[00:32:20]>> Yes, sir.

[00:32:21]>> Now, there's two options today. We keep you in jail indefinitely, waiting for court dates, or you're released. Do you understand those two options?

[00:32:32]>> Yes, sir.

[00:32:34]>> Now, you're lucky because today the option is not mine.

[00:32:39]Today, it's somebody else's option.

[00:32:42]That's why you're lucky because if the option was mine, it wouldn't even be an option. I would keep you in jail. Is that clear?

[00:32:50]>> Yes, sir. those yes sirs are getting lower and lower >> because anyone who's violated these these conditions this many times in less than one calendar month to me shows me they don't care what a judge says. Do you understand that?

[00:33:05]>> Yes, sir.

[00:33:06]>> So again, I want to be clear. You're lucky that it's not my choice today.

[00:33:10]It's somebody else's choice and that somebody else wants us to release you with these conditions. You were to check in once per week. Is that somehow not clear?

[00:33:22]>> No, it's clear.

[00:33:23]>> Okay. You're not to get rearrested. Is that somehow not clear?

[00:33:29]>> Nope.

[00:33:31]>> Is that clear?

[00:33:32]>> It's clear.

[00:33:33]>> Okay. Now, this person who we haven't even gotten to yet, the one you're supposed to have no contact with, you're supposed to have no contact with them.

[00:33:40]Is that clear?

[00:33:42]>> Yes. And if you violate these conditions again, I will gladly lock you up waiting for court dates with no date in the future. Is that clear?

[00:33:51]>> Yes.

[00:33:51]>> This judge don't play.

[00:33:53]>> Okay. So, we're going to keep you on level three because some today it's somebody else's choice and not mine. Is that clear?

[00:34:01]>> Yes.

[00:34:01]>> If I see you in the future and you say you didn't understand, would that be wrong? Because you clearly do understand now?

[00:34:07]>> I understand.

[00:34:08]>> Perfect. The system's working.

[00:34:12]You have a new charge W26687.

[00:34:17]You're charged with contempt by violating a domestic violence restraining order under 2C 299B.

[00:34:24]You should have been provided a copy of the charges. If you weren't, you'll get it by the end of the day. Do you understand?

[00:34:29]>> Yes.

[00:34:31]>> These charges carry a maximum penalty of six months in jail, a fine of up to $1,000, possible community service, restitution, probation, or all of the above. Do you understand?

[00:34:41]Yes.

[00:34:42]>> You have the following rights. You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say may be used against you. You are presumed innocent unless the state can prove your guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. You have the right to be represented by an attorney. And you have been found eligible for representation by the office of the public defender.

[00:34:57]Mr. Roar.

[00:34:58]>> Bill Roar. Public defender. We enter plea of not guilty.

[00:35:02]>> Thank you.

[00:35:04]>> Sir, are you a veteran of the United States military?

[00:35:08]>> No.

[00:35:09]Thank you. I have another question. It's a long question. Just wait for the end before you answer it. If you're not a citizen of the United States and if you plead guilty or are convicted of certain offenses, it may result in you being deported from the United States or it may prevent you from being readmitted if you leave voluntarily, or it may prevent you from ever becoming a naturalized American citizen. Do you understand that you have the right to seek advice from an attorney about the effect a guilty plea or finding may have on your immigration status?

[00:35:38]>> Yes.

[00:35:39]Thank you. Prosecutor, your position on Mr. Pizaric >> recommends PML3, no victim contact with initials EP. That's echo papa. No weapons, no stalking. The matter was referred to the grand jury to a grand jury.

[00:35:54]>> Thank you, sir. Do you know somebody with the initials ET?

[00:35:59]>> EP. Yes.

[00:36:00]>> You're to have no contact with that person as a condition of being released.

[00:36:04]Do you understand?

[00:36:05]>> Yes.

[00:36:07]You're on pre-trial service monitoring now, so you know how that goes. Correct.

[00:36:11]>> Yes.

[00:36:12]>> We're going to continue you on level three on this new charge as well, which means you'll check in once per week. Do you understand?

[00:36:18]>> Yes.

[00:36:19]>> You cannot get rearrested for any reason. You cannot miss any court dates.

[00:36:22]You cannot miss any check-ins. Do you understand?

[00:36:24]>> Yes.

[00:36:27]>> Cannot possess weapons of any kind as a condition of your release. Do you understand?

[00:36:30]>> Yes.

[00:36:31]cannot stalk or try to reach out to BP in any manner. Not live, not virtual, not through a third party. Nothing at all is permitted. Do you understand?

[00:36:41]>> Understood.

[00:36:43]>> Continuing to violate that restraining order would be considered a violation of this as well. Is that clear?

[00:36:50]>> Yes.

[00:36:54]>> Now, in this case, sir, new court date.

[00:37:00]has not been set. Your case is being referred to the grand jury. You and your attorney will be contacted once they make a decision. Do you understand?

[00:37:08]>> Yes, >> sir. I spent extra time with you today cuz I'm trying to get through to you that if you continue to violate these conditions, there will come a time that you're just going to be locked up waiting for court dates. Is that clear?

[00:37:20]>> Yes.

[00:37:21]>> So, you're being released today. Take this opportunity, grasp it by the horns, follow these conditions, and stay out of jail. Is that clear?

[00:37:28]>> Yes, sir. Do you have any questions?

[00:37:30]>> Yes, I do. Go >> ahead. Okay.

[00:37:33]>> Don't talk about Don't talk about the facts.

[00:37:35]>> No, no. My address is one, correct?

[00:37:39]>> Well, where I live, >> I'm going to stop you right there. I don't like to put addresses on the record. Let's go off the tape for a minute.

[00:37:46]>> This judge definitely don't play around.

[00:37:48]And when he yells, you get that cold force coming through like, "You better listen to me." And that's it. But I would love to see a sovereign citizen in his court because they would not last two seconds. I have a feeling that he would just arrest him right on the spot.

[00:38:02]Anyway, I hope you enjoyed all the videos. Give it a thumbs up if you did.

[00:38:05]Leave a comment and I'll see you around on the next one. [music] [music] Yeah. [music] Yeah.

[00:38:42]He [music] walked in standing on his own. No lawyer there. He stood alone.

[00:38:47]The court [music] called up the [singing] witness first. And every argument was rehearsed. The papers came, the dates were read. A simple [music] typo caught [singing] his eye instead.

[00:38:58]He pointed out each line he found.

[00:39:00][music] Certain he turned the whole thing around. Then he reached into a stack of pages, ready to challenge what was written for ages. [music] Every sentence, every claim, certain nothing would stay the same. He said THIS CASE IS VOID. This whole thing should be [music] destroyed. Claim the foundation couldn't stand. pointing the papers in his [music] head. He said the court got it all wrong. Read his motion loud and strong. But when the hearing [music] reached the end, the case moved forward once again.

[00:39:41][music] Once again, he spoke of [music] poison, fruit, and doubt. said every branch had to come out. Talked about an LLC [music] saying that's what changed the history.

[00:40:00]Then came one final challenge made demanding [music] proof before they played. Every word was carefully planned trying to make the whole [music] case stand. The courtroom listened calm and still waiting to hear the [music] judge's will. One by one the points were weighed. Then the ruling finally came.

[00:40:22]Said this [music] case is void. This whole thing should be destroyed. Claimed the foundation [music] couldn't stand. Pointing the papers in his head. He said the court got [music] it all wrong. Read his motion loud and strong. But when the hearing reached the end, the case moved forward once again. [music] Sometimes confidence [music] feels enough even when the road gets rough. Every motion has its day. But [music] facts still have their place to stay. Promises filled the courtroom.

[00:41:05]What more chance was waiting [music] there. The next step now is his to choose whether to follow or refuse.

[00:41:17]>> [music] >> or refuse.

[00:41:26]HE SAID THIS [music] CASE IS VOID.

[00:41:30]BELIEVE THE RECORD COULD be destroyed.

[00:41:32]The judge heard every word aloud that [music] answered clear before the crown.

[00:41:37]The hearing close. The lesson stayed.

[00:41:40]Every argument had been weighed. The story ends but not the fight. The next DECISION STARTS TONIGHT.

[00:41:58][music] >> [music]