They're Complete Trash

Ajouté : 2026-06-04

[00:00:00]I know I've yapped and made fun of countless news outlets and tabloids because so many of these mainstream journalistic outlets are just trash, irredeemable garbage. And I'm one of the few brave souls on this planet that raw dogs the internet. So I actually don't use an ad block when I go on stream looking at like, you know, what's going on in the world. And these websites are genuinely inaccessible unless you are using an ad block because they are so riddled with ads out the wazoo where you only get like a couple of sentences of an article before an autoplaying ad or an autoscrolling ad or ads on either side are just butt [ __ ] your eyes. It is miserable. But standing at top this pile of filth is what I believe to be the worst offender of all of them. And that's the New York Post. Now, of course, there's not a single sentient organism on this planet that would ever misconrue what the New York Post does with journalism, but when you're searching for information on something going on in the news, the New York Post is you usually towards the top of that search on Google. So, people end up there by accident, and it's an immediately regretful experience. It's a lot like the backrooms. Actually, no one goes there on purpose. It's a [ __ ] hellscape when you do end up there on New York Post. You can't wait to get out. So oftent times I'll click on something not looking at where it's going like the source and it's the New York Post and then my eyes start to bleed because again the internet without protection is a totally different experience. So going to the New York Post there is horrors beyond your wildest imaginations. It's love craftian. And I made a whole video ranting about this a couple years ago.

[00:01:38]It's only gotten worse since then by the way. But I find it so fascinating how all of these companies wage war on ad block. We we need you to turn your ad block off to access our articles.

[00:01:49]Otherwise, you don't get it. You're stealing from us with your ad block. And then if you ever do make the mistake of buying into that siren song, that [ __ ] fraudulent fib, what you get is ass blasted by ads and then you can't even get the information anymore. So, the only way to even get the information from the sites is to use the ad blocks because otherwise all you get are ads.

[00:02:12]And these are from like official corporate corporateowned websites. It's so interesting because they try to shame you into turning it off, but if you do, it's a huge mistake. It's a really big mistake. But anyway, uh I've yapped about that a lot. Instead, I want to blabber more directly about the New York Post because I just saw this wacky humdinger where they Oh boy, that's getting that's getting my bubble guts going talking about the New York Post.

[00:02:37]They made an article covering Kane Parson's home and they have a tweet that just outright doxes him. I of course, you know, redacted that information here, but they proudly posted this tweet inside the unassuming $450k California house behind the $118 million back rooms horror phenomenon and got community noted about how it's literally just doxing, which is not only against Twitter terms, but illegal. and it is just doxing him. I'm pretty sure they deleted the original tweet, but the article is still up now. I think they also got rid of the picture there in the article, too. But they they wanted to make sure that their high quality writing was able to persist beyond the purge here. Like, yeah, they may have done something illegal, but come on. The nice AI summary they have of Kane Parson's family home, that has to that has to live on New York Post somewhere.

[00:03:30]So, we're going to take a look at that.

[00:03:32]But what a diabolical, useless piece of [ __ ] the New York Post is. Why even make this in the first place? They post a picture of this house where allegedly Kane lives with his family. And they just post it out there for everyone to see. Hey, this is where that guy lives. The guy who just has a $118 million box office home run. This is his house. And it just has like the house number. They say where it's located.

[00:03:59]all just posted out there. Why? That's that's just it is just doxing. Like there was a few people I saw come in saying, "Well, it's not technically doxing because they didn't give the direct address, but the ad like the house number is visible there. They gave the location. They show the house. They show the square footage and they describe every single facet of the house. That's about that's everything but the address. You can find that in 2 seconds. It is just doxing him." And the New York Post made a whole article about it. That's unhinged. What? Like what? I don't understand why. Like who how did this float across someone's desk? Like I need pictures of Spider-Man and I need pictures of Kane Parson's home right now. We got to post it for everyone to see. Go out there and get it. I just can't even put myself in the shoes of someone so stupid that they thought this was a good idea. I can't wrap my head around the idea behind this article in the first place. But uh hats off to Mary Kay Jacob here for the slam dunk. If that's even a real person. That's probably just a madeup name right there as some [ __ ] like Jericho Cheeseburger.

[00:05:05]I I'm doubtful Mary Kay. Jacob's real, but if she is, she should be [ __ ] ashamed of herself. But anyway, this is what the article looks like now.

[00:05:12]Director behind Hollywood phenomenon Back Rooms is a 20-year-old YouTuber who still lives with his parents, which it already feels like it's immediately belittling him. Like, hey, this guy still lives with his parents. Look at Isn't that so weird? And then they now have this black box here, but that's where I imagine the picture was of the house that just fully doxed him. I'm going to quickly fast forward to the very end of the article because the last couple sentences are cinema. So Mary Kay Jacobs spends this whole article just dabbling around in like nothing Burgerville and then ends it by saying, "It is unclear if he still remains in the home. The Post has reached out to Parsons for comment. So, she's made a whole article about this is his home.

[00:05:56]This is where he's living with his parents. And then giving like a little background on their relationship and the history there and then ends it by saying, "Also, we don't know if he actually still lives in this home. We had to reach out to him for comment but haven't heard back."

[00:06:10]Ardan, you made a whole article doxing this home saying this is where he lives.

[00:06:15]And then then you say, "Well, we don't actually know if this is where he lives, by the way."

[00:06:20]What a journey. What an adventure you've taken us on here, Mary. The New York Post has the hard-hitting stuff. I tell you what, thought-provoking. Also, why are you reaching out to him for a comment on if he still lives in the house that they have now just doxed?

[00:06:34]Hey, Kane. So, we uh Mary over here, our superstar. Yeah, she posted your home or what she believed to be your home, the 450K unassuming California home, as well as the house number on it. by the way.

[00:06:48]Uh she posted that publicly and we just want to confirm you you do still live there, right? We we doxed the right home or should we keep looking? All right, great. Uh can't wait to hear back from you. Give me give me a buzz. Why? Like anyway, here's what the rest of the dog [ __ ] looks like. It's a few sentences they took from Kane's Wikipedia to give a bit of background. Then they go in to say how he still lives in the modest fourbedroom home according to property records. and then says to how different that is, how odd and wacky because that's stark contrast to the lavish estates typically associated with Hollywood success.

[00:07:24]Man, New York Post, that Whoa, you're really cooking there. That is so different. Let's dox him. That'll that'll teach him to be different. Oh, you want to live in a modest home? Not on New York Postw watch. We're scooting in sideways, taking photos of it, and posting it online. Hope you enjoy. Maybe that'll teach you. This is another fun thing that the New York Post has plastered in their article here. This backrooms poster. And I think this speaks volumes to the level of uh journalistic integrity that this organ organization has. They didn't even bother to check if this is a real poster. It's not. This is not even a real poster. But underneath it, they don't even try and explain like, oh, this is like a fan-made thing or whatever. They then just go back into saying, "The unassuming Northern California home stands in sharp contrast." Just repeating a sentence from earlier. I think the AI bugged out there for a second. Mary Kay Jacobs uh prompt must have got a little wonky, but that isn't even a real poster of the back rooms. That's an image that was fan-made or at least speculated fan-made like long ago. It was like on the IMDb for a little bit, which is where it comes from. But if you type in backrooms poster, it'll be one of the first couple of things that pop up. But if you click on it, you'll learn that it's not an official poster. It's never been an official poster. So the New York Post couldn't even do the bare minimum of just grabbing like a real poster for it.

[00:08:49]Instead, they use a fake one in their own article. And the rest of the article is spent like going over the marital status of Kane's parents, like deep diving into them, giving their full names and everything and talking about them. And so now they're caught in the New York Post crosshairs like just for nothing. Like this article does nothing except just dox him.

[00:09:14]Wow. New York Post. Real incredible stuff there. It's just such a piece of [ __ ] And it's not exclusive to the New York Post. There's so many tabloids just like this. They're just the most egregious. And it's not even just tabloids either. So many of these legacy journalistic outlets have really just gone down the [ __ ] Like there still are some like hard-hitting pieces of journalism that do come out, but it's few and far between now. A lot of it's just this constant battle for clicks by any means necessary. So just like blatant rage bait or just incorrect [ __ ] or underhanded bizarre [ __ ] like New York Post does. It's just such a mess. I want to yap about the New York Post one though because a they suck and b this was a weird ridiculous decision they made here to just dox Kane and his family. Uh allegedly they're not even sure if they doxed them properly because at the very end they say well we don't actually know if he still lives there.

[00:10:17]We just went by the property records we you know we were [ __ ] we were stalking him. We were stalking him and we think he's probably here so bang let's dox it. It's it sucks. Anyway, just want to yab about it. That's it.