Dr. Cheikh Anta Diop argues that ancient Egyptians were of African (Negroid) origin, not Asian or European, based on linguistic evidence, ancient historical testimonies, and archaeological analysis of Egyptian statues and monuments that consistently depict Negroid physical features. Diop demonstrates that the Egyptian civilization originated from Africa, specifically Ethiopia, and that the notion of Egyptian civilization being of Asian or European origin is a historical falsification that has been perpetuated through biased scholarship.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
๐๐๐๐พ "THE AFRICAN ORIGIN OF CIVILIZATION MYTH OR REALITY" BY C.A.D โจ๏ธ๐#๏ธโฃ๐๐ชถ๐ง๐พโโ๏ธ๐ชฝUNRAdded:
Peace.
Welcome to the YouTube live book reading of the African origin of civilization myth or reality by the great Dr. Shika.
Welcome YouTube.
It's the peaceful part of YouTube where we read books and learn from masters. So we pick up in the third chapter down at the bottom of page 69, modern falsification of history.
I'm your moderator and narrator around Nevada Riley. Peace and welcome. Thank you for being here this live reading.
Here we go.
However they were, however imperfect their administration, we cannot believe in view of their number and their position as conquerors that they spontaneously abandon their language to adopt that of the Berbers.
No Latin text indicates this. Usually social relations are much more complex and that complexity is reflected in linguistics.
Even when a language disappears, it reacts on the victorious tongue by transforming it and the latter no longer remains exactly what it was before.
Thus, it is hard to understand how my modern Berber can be free from any vandal influence.
Even harder to understand is that the modern Berber is not a descendant of the Vandals, especially when he has blue eyes and blonde hair.
Iben Caldun's treaties on the Berber is merely a series of undocumented quotations.
the fact that there are no Berber in Egypt except imaginary ones, that there are scarcely any in Tunisia, and that their number increases from east to west to reach its maximum in Morocco seems to confirm the hypothesis of the Vandal origin. Historians pay little attention to these facts because it is absolutely necessary to make the Berber ancient enough to justify Egyptian civilization.
Yet the 20 Berber sentences found in Arab texts scarcely date back to the 12th century. Whereas the tiffna writing and the still undeciphered symbols called Libyan seen due to the influence of the indigenous element of the negroid Phoenician colony of Carthage prior to the arrival of the Vandals.
To recapitulate the stratification of the North African population from prehistoric times to our day would be as follows.
Negroes and crow magagnons a race extinct for 10,000 years that being the crow magnets.
Negroes and capsian negroes during the Phoenician epic.
Indo-Uropeans starting in 15 B.CEE and probably mixed with Negroes. Negroes at the time of the Romans with a large percentage of mixed bloods, vandals and Arabs.
What then is more natural than the that basis that the basis of Berber vocabulary should be in turn Indo-Uropean Seemetic or African depending on one's point of view.
Continuing with the development of Egyptology, we reach Maspiro who in the first chapter of his histo pupils de orient describes the origins of the Egyptians. The Egyptians seem quite early to have lost the the memory of their beginnings. Did they come from central Africa or from the inter interior of Asia? According to the almost unanimous testimony of the ancient historians, they belonged to an African race which first established in Ethiopia on the middle Nile gradually came down toward the sea following the course of the river. To demonstrate this, one relied on the evident analogies between the customs and religion of the kingdom of Maro and the customs and religion of the Egyptians proper. Today we know beyond the shadow of a doubt that Ethiopia, at least the Ethiopia known by the Greeks, far from having colonized Egypt, was itself colonized by Egypt.
starting with the 12th dynasty and was for centuries included in the kingdom of the pharaohs.
Before continuing with Mass Biro's thesis, we should note what seems already to have altered in few in those few introductory sentences. It is unlikely that the Egyptians ever forgot their origin. Maspiro apparently confuses two distinct notions. The primitive birthplace from which a people started and the ethnic origin responsible for the color of the race.
The Egyptians never forgot the latter any more than they forgot the former.
It is expressed in all their art, throughout all their literature, in all their cultural manifestations in their traditions and language. So much so that even their country was designated by analogy with their own skin color, not by analogy with the color of the soil by the name Chem, which coincides with Ham Cham. biblical ancestor of blacks. To say that Kemet refers to the color of the Egyptians earth rather than designating the country through the color of the race could inspire similar reasoning to explain the present- day expression black Africa and white Africa. Maspiro refers to the unanimous testimony of ancient historians on the Egyptian race, but he intentionally emits their p precision.
What we already know about the testimony of the ancients proves that they did not use the vague term African race. from Herododus to Diodoris. From Maspiro's quotes, whenever they mention the Egyptian people, they specified that a negro race was involved.
Wow.
Here we can trace the evolution of the gradual alterations of facts in textbooks that will mold the opinion of high school and university students.
This is all the more serious because the great mass of students. This is all more serious because the great mass of knowledge to be acquired in the modern world leaves the younger generation with the exception of professionals no time to consult original sources and to appreciate the gap between the truth and what they have been taught. On the contrary, a certain tendency to laziness encourages them to be satisfied with the textbook and to accept stereotype notions of infallible authority from them as if from a catechism.
If we applied Maspiro's reasoning to refute the ideas of Diodoris on Ethiopia's antiquity, we would be able to conclude that since Napoleon conquered and annexed Italy in the 19th century, Rome never civilized Gaul, which would be obvious historical error.
Peace, highest heart, love.
Welcome.
Peace and blessings. Coco says, "Awesome."
Hi, Heart Love. Welcome to the live book reading. And you know what's awesome about this? We just went through the great Malcolm X solar return and um heavenly solar return. So, wanted to make sure come in on here give you some light live from the light. Here we go.
Welcome everyone. Thank you YouTube peace. We are in the third chapter still modern falsification of history and um we are flying through running through it page 72 in the middle.
Moreover, the Bible states that Mesaram, son of Ham, brother of Kush and of Canaan, came from the Mesopotamia to settle along with his children on the banks of the Nile. Maspiro fails to add that Ham Canaan and Kush are negroes according to the same Bible he is quoting. This means once again that Egypt, Ham, Messer, Ethiopia, Kush, Palestine and Phoenicia before the Jews and Syrians or Canaan, Ara, Arabia, Felix before the Arabs, Pout, Hava, Sabah were all occupied by Negroes who had created civilizations thousands of years old in those regions and had maintained family relationships.
But then he continues, Loim, the eldest among them, personifies the Egyptian proper, the Roto or the Rome of the hieroglyphic inscriptions.
Anime represents the great tribe of the Anu who founded on the north Helopalis and on of the south Herthus in prehistoric times.
Leaham is the Libyan people living west of the Nile.
Nafetuum settled in the delta south of Memphis.
Finally, Pathus or Pathus Rosie, land of the south, inhabits present day Sai between Memphis and the first cataract. This tradition which brings the Egyptians from Asia through the ismas of Suez was not unknown to classical authors. Ply the elder attributes the founding of Helopalis to Arabs, but it was never so popular as the opinion that they came from the high plateaus of Ethiopia.
This identification is more or less unfounded. It becomes contradictory when it links Libyans said to have blue eyes and blonde hair with the Leah Habam son of Mezeram both of them negroes. Another contradiction, Maspiro seems at times to accept the theory of the Asiatic origin for the Egyptians and recalls the opinion of Ply the Elder who attributes the founding of Helopalus to Arabs. In the same text, Maspiro credits the settlement of that city to the Anu, whom he identifies with the Animeron, a Negro. Our comments on the Arabs in a later chapter will eliminate any possibility of placing them at the founding of Helopalis, especially if it occurred in prehistoric times. As author affirms he can see why we can see po why planes opinion did not enjoy the popularity among the ancients that Maspiro would have wished to return to Maspiro's account.
In our day the origin and ethnographic affinities of the population have inspired lengthy debate. First, the 17th and 18th century travelers misled by the appearance of certain mongeralized cops certified that their predecessor in the Feronic age had a puffed up face, bug eyes, flat nose, fleshy lips, and that they presented certain characteristics, features of the Negro race. This era common at the start of the century vanished once and for all as soon as the French Commission had published its great work. Anyone reading that statement without first consulting Vony's testimony and explanatory note on the climactic effects on racial appearance might easily be persuaded that those travelers in centuries past could have let themselves be easily deceived by appearance. Bearing in mind that what was what has been said about the gradual infiltration of whites into Egypt especially during the low epic in the delta. It there was mongreization.
It could only have resulted in whitening the population, not in any negriification that would make former whites unrecognizable by unprejudices of observers.
Let us see how, if we are to believe maspiro, that common error vanished once and for all after the publication of the great work by the Frenchman commission.
On examining innumerable reproductions of statues and boss reliefs, we recognized that the people represented on the monuments instead of presenting peculiarities and the general appearance of the negro really resembled the fine white races of Europe and Western Asia. Today, after a century of research and excavations, we no longer find it difficult to imagine. I shall not say that Samaticus and Cestrus, but Chops, who helped to build the pyramids.
It suffices to enter a museum and examine the oldstyle statues assembled there. At first glance, we feel that the artist has sought to reproduce an exact likeness in the accurate portrayal of head and limbs. Then brushing aside the nuances proper to each individual, we easily detect the general character and principal types of the race. One of them thick set and heavy corresponds quite well to one of the prevalent types among the modern fellas. Another depicting members of the upper class shows us a man tall and slender with broad muscular shoulders, welldeveloped chest, sineui arms, small hands, slim hips, thin legs.
The anatomical details of his knee and calf muscle stand out as is the case with most people who walk a lot. His feet are long, narrow, flattened. At the end, by habitually walking without shoes. His head often too heavy for him.
His body expresses kindness and instinctiveness, instinctive sadness.
His brow is square, perhaps somewhat low. His nose short and fleshy. His eyes are large and open wide. His cheeks round. His lips thick but not averted.
His mouth stretched a bit too far.
Retains a resigned and almost painful smile. These features common to most of the statues of the old and middle empire persist through all the epics. The monuments of the 18th dynasty so inferior in artistic beauty to those of the old dynasties transmit the primitive type without appreciable alteration. Today, although the upper classics have been disfigured by repeated misogynation with the foreigner, ordinary peasants almost everywhere have retained the appearance of their ancestors. Any fellow can contemplate with astonishment the statues of the Sheffron or the Colassi of Sanuskrit Sanurit transporting across Cairo after more than 4,000 years of existence the fenomy of those old pharaohs.
Peace. Welcome everyone.
We're flying through. We're in the third chapter.
Highest heart love. Isn't this great?
Right.
Divine days and nights. Highest heart love.
All right. when we close out this chapter and uh this uh page and then we'll reconvene such is the hub of mass bureau's demonstration.
We have not omitted a single word.
What does it prove?
What does the great work teach us? The author informs us that Egyptology is already a very old science. For a century, specialists have excavated and searched. Now, we know the prototype of the ancient Egyptian down to the most minor ethnic detail. The artist has depicted his exact likeness.
Thanks to the realistic art, we can reconstitute ethnically the members of the upper class. According to Maspi's observations, they had a nose short and fleshy, a mouth stretched a bit too far.
Thick lips, large eyes opened wide, round cheeks, a brow perhaps somewhat low. Broad muscular shoulders, small hands, slim hips, thin legs. These common features perpetuated throughout the old and middle kingdoms.
instead of presenting pec pecurularities and the general appearance of the negro rarely resembled the fine white races of Europe and western Asia.
That conclusion needs no commentary.
None at all.
After so solemn a confirmation of the Negro origin by an author whose intent was to destroy it, we see once again the impossibility of proving the opposite of the truth.
proved it again using their own words.
Love to all our friends and family.
eyes, heart, love to those before us that did the work. We ring the bell.
Drop a pin right there.
Gaston Maspiro who became in 1889 the director of the Cairo Museum was a scholar to whom we are indebted for several translations of Egyptian texts.
He had the technical preparation necessary for establishing all that was dismonstraable.
His failure, despite that knowledge, like the failure of scholars who tackled this problem before or after him, constitutes, as it were, the most solid, if unintentional, proof of the Negro origin.
We'll pause right here.
T back this third chapter when we reconvene with the African origin of civilization myth or reality by the great Dr. Shik ant job and edited and translated by Mercer. Thank you so much for being here. Divine days and nights, highest heart love.
Yes. Yes. We light it up. Honoring our family and friends. Look at that. I had childhood friend named Ke. That's awesome.
That's so so powerful. I love that, Coco.
Thank you, Oracle.
We shake it up on YouTube reading books, right? Live from the light.
Yeah, we do.
You really do. Like you say, we're the champions.
You know, we're the champions. Book reading live from the light.
I want you to have a wonderful day.
Let's light it up. Honor all our friends and family with a glass of love water.
Right. Shining our light out in the world. Let's go outside.
Complete work. I got a great seminar tomorrow teaching people about self-healing and the harmonic vibrational manual.
It's going to be a nice forum. And wait.
Love to all the solar returns, all those in our lives, all that keep the light shining, that inspire us, and all that have risen and elevated to the next level.
Thank you for guiding us while you're here.
I heart love. I love you.
I love you. I love you. I love you. I love you.
Shaking it up for real.
Let's go shine our light. Happy Wednesday. Going into meditation after we get back from our AM run.
Sending all my love.
to my daughter Bubbles Isis. I love you so much. Can't wait. Coming up when your soul return. Yeah. Today I'm what?
17,069 I I love love love you.
I I I I love Oh, you you you you know cuz I love myself. Have a wonderful day. I'll talk to you soon. Peace.
points.
Related Videos
She Taught Me What Most Americans Will Never Learn
JustinAlvo
259 viewsโข2026-06-03
Native Americans in Pacific Northwest preserve salmon fishing tradition for future generations
CBSMornings
719 viewsโข2026-05-30
5 Mistakes Americans Make in Australia That Australian Spot Instantly
Auzura-i2e
159 viewsโข2026-05-29
โMuch Larger Than Any Man Back Homeโ โ German POW Women Compared American Cowboys to German Men
ForgottenFronts-d6q
2K viewsโข2026-06-01
Before Castles: Discovering Portugalโs Colossal Chalcolithic Stronghold
prehistoricportugal
184 viewsโข2026-05-29
Discover the survival and hunting methods of the Hadzabe tribe โ Cooking in the wildest way
hadzapeopledocumentary
507 viewsโข2026-05-28
ETHIOPIA โ The Most Misunderstood Country In East Africa?
ZiAfreen
165 viewsโข2026-05-31
kenapa tari tor-tor sakral bagi suku batak#taritradisional #culturalheritage #shorts
creativestory-x5u3o
973 viewsโข2026-05-29











