Krugman effectively exposes tariffs as a regressive tax that punishes consumers to subsidize corporations under the guise of national interest. It is a sharp reminder that protectionist shortcuts fail to deliver growth and only leave the public footing the bill.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Remember Tariffs?Added:
Remember tariffs, they have not gone away. Hi, Paul Krugman with another video update from another cafe. Um, you may remember that back in April 2025, which was seven years a well actually just about one year ago, but it feels like longer. Um, Donald Trump shocked us all with massive tariffs across on basically everybody.
Um, that were, you know, it was an extraordinary um, policy move. It was also clearly illegal. It was also clearly really very stupid from a the point of view of any kind of rational economic strategy. Um, all of that seemed like the biggest thing in the world at the time, but of course it's been overshadowed in the last 70 plus days by something new which was also illegal and uh massively stupid and even more so because it's it's war. So everything is the tariff issue has kind of receded in our perception. uh but it has not gone away and since the initial imposition of tariffs uh we've had a lot of action again it would be the biggest thing in the world if it wasn't for everything else that is going on which is that the whole legal basis of the tariffs was tossed out by the Supreme Court after having been ruled illegal by lower courts uh at in several different uh hearings. Um the basis of the original tariffs was a obscure law called the International Economic Emergency Power Act uh which uh you know clearly did not apply to the situation as of April 2025. Um when those were tossed, Trump responded or his people responded by invoking section 122.
There's a lot of section numbers in all of this stuff and the question is what law are they sections of? And the answer is most of they're all different laws.
But anyway, uh which is balance of payments emergency which allows a 10% tariff lower than the AIPA tariffs. Um but that was also clearly illegal and a court has just ruled that those were illegal too. So now that will be appealed and there will be a couple more stages and we'll see what the Supreme Court does. Um in many ways I think people kind of tuned it out because they figured that the the new tariffs there's a time limit on them. So 150 days. So by the time the courts reached the decision, that story would be over anyway and the Trump administration would have turned to other tariffs. um that turns out to actually not be a good it's not good to ignore them because one thing we have learned actually we should have known if we thought about it was that when the administration imposes illegal tariffs and they are eventually ruled illegal that is a that is a machine for ripping off the American public. Uh when the tariffs are imposed they get passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices. when they are ruled illegal, many of the companies that were importing goods get refunds, which is slowly getting underway for the original tariffs and will eventually happen probably for the new tariffs. Uh, but they don't pass that on to consumers. Uh, and as I'll explain in a minute, that's not a result of conspiracy. That's basically a policy failure. Given the way this works, there is no reason to think that consumers would benefit from the refunds on the past tariffs. Um but in any case, what we're seeing now is really really uh destructive policies. Uh although you know it takes a lot of bad economic policy to do as much damage as a as a war, especially a stupid failed war, but that's that's where we are. Let's talk for a second about the about the tariffs. Um the uh crucial point for the immediate effects is this. When a tariff is imposed, they you know it the tariff is paid by importers which is either companies that specialize in import export or uh fairly often sort of US companies or retailers that are buying stuff from abroad and arranging for it to be shipped either to be used in production or uh or to be sold um on to to US consumers. uh they're from their point of view the tariff is a cost per unit sold. It's a marginal cost to use e economic jargon and so of course they have every incentive to pass the tariff on to consumers unless foreigners bear the tariff which actually doesn't happen. Uh but that's although Trump insists that it does but that doesn't happen. um when the tariff is eventually ruled illegal, then you know that requires you can't say, "Oh, well, sorry about that, but water under the bridge."
If you've collected taxes from somebody and you didn't have the right to do that, then rule of law at the most minimal level says you have to pay it back, which is in fact going to happen to a lot of a lot of the Trump tariffs.
Um but that is not a marginal cost. The amount that an importer gets as a refund from illegal tariffs that were imposed in the past doesn't depend on how much they sell now. It's not a marginal cost again to use the economics jargon. So people have been saying that they the fact that there's no sign that the tariff refunds will be passed on to consumers is somehow monopoly power or collusion or something. Well, I'm not saying there isn't monopoly power and collusion, but that's you don't need that. That's exactly what you expect even if there was lots of competition among the importers. Uh the the the refund doesn't affect the price that a company needs to charge to make back its expenses. It doesn't affect the price they need to charge to to stay in line with their competitors. So um we have created a machine which rips off consumers when the tariffs are imposed then hands a bunch of money to corporations when the tariffs are ruled illegal. Uh so this is not, you know, this is this is really not great stuff and it's pretty big. Uh the Trump tariffs have been something like 1% of GDP and most of them illegal. Uh and then therefore a ripoff of consumers.
That's a big deal. Uh that's uh that's hundreds of billions of dollars that were taken for no good reason. Um it almost seems beyond uh seems beside the point to point out that the tariffs have also failed all of the things that they were supposed to do. Rebuild manufacturing while manufacturing employment is down. Reduce the trade deficit. Well, the trade deficit isn't down. So this was all a really large burden on the US public that is um uh you know completely without any payoff.
uh what happens from here? Well, you might think that maybe maybe at least the administration has that Trump and and maybe at least the people around him have learned a lesson and they'll stop doing such stupid things. Not going to happen. Uh nothing nothing is learned here. The latest is that Kevin Hasset, the administration's chief economist more or less, um, says that we're going to have 6% growth this year, which is, you know, that doesn't happen except when you're coming out of a deep deep recession happened. Last time it happened except for recovery from COVID was in 1984. Morning in America. There is no reason at all to think that we're going to have morning under Trump. So another policy disaster again overshadowed by the war but this is really really bad. Take care.
Related Videos
Truckers Finally Seeing Higher Rates… But Carriers Are STILL Going Bankrupt
LetsTruckTribe
480 views•2026-05-28
IS THIS THE REAL REASON FOR DATA CENTERS?
PrepperDawg
7K views•2026-05-31
JPMorgan CEO JUST NUKED Mamdani... as NYC's Middle Class COLLAPSES
Englishman-In-NewYork
7K views•2026-05-30
The Dark Age Of Blue Collar Has Begun
derekpolasekofficial
4K views•2026-05-28
What has a broader economic impact, corporate downsizing or ecological collapse?
theratracejournal
1K views•2026-05-29
China Is Quietly Buying Gold, the Iran Deal Is Frozen, and Silver Is Heating Up
RichardHolloway0
694 views•2026-05-31
Why Canadians can no longer afford to survive #canada #inflation #shorts
TrueNorthInvestor-v4j
131 views•2026-06-01
Why People Pay More For Someone They Trust
financian_
66K views•2026-05-28











