One Question DESTROYED His Entire Argument

Added: 2026-05-26

[00:00:00]And why do you support Trump?

[00:00:02]>> Immigration policy, the ICE policy, um, pretty much everything. It's economy.

[00:00:14]>> Okay.

[00:00:14]>> Election has genders and bathrooms.

[00:00:17]Just the basic stuff.

[00:00:20]>> Basic stuff. Okay, I got you. Um, can you name one macro indicator that's better off since Trump got in office?

[00:00:26]>> Say that one more time. Can you name one macroeconomic indicator that is better off since Trump got in office?

[00:00:34]>> Um, right now it's is kind of kind of bad, but preIran war it's a lot better than buying this four years in the span of a whole year.

[00:00:46]>> Within what indicator?

[00:00:49]>> Gas prices were down to $192 in my area.

[00:00:55]>> And how are they doing right now?

[00:00:58]They're not good right now. But >> And who caused that?

[00:01:03]>> Well, wouldn't you think that?

[00:01:06]>> Was it Trump?

[00:01:09]>> Yeah.

[00:01:10]>> Okay. So, if it was Trump that caused that, then can you explain to me why you're okay with that given that he made it worse? Like, why would you cite that as a good thing, but you wouldn't cite it as a bad thing?

[00:01:22]>> Well, look at Iran. Wouldn't you think taking out their nuclear weapons a lot better than gas prices being low, >> the number one state sponsor? I'm sure.

[00:01:33]>> And did you know that we were um that Trump got him closer to developing a nuclear weapon because he pulled out of the JCPOA, which would have them below 3.67% enrichment of uranium right now until 2030 and that we could renegotiate at that point. So Trump is the one that caused them to get closer to a nuclear weapon and also caused our gas prices to go up.

[00:02:00]>> Why didn't Why didn't Biden at least make any >> any deal? Because Trump undermine the deal and there was a possible Trump administration that could come after Biden. So could Trump could just pull out of any agreement that Biden established again. So there was really no incentive for Iran to establish an agreement again unless it was for sure that they would have a continuence of the JCPOA without a limitation of it happen uh limitation of it in the future. But if Donald Trump never pulled out of the JCPOA, that never would have been a risk in the first place and we would have been able to continue it.

[00:02:33]>> What about Biden pulling out Afghanistan? Wouldn't you think that's kind of embarrassing? Trump set up that agreement and gave 5,000 members of the Taliban to defend uh so they could uh and they some of those members were involved in the attack at the air base that led to those service members dying.

[00:02:52]>> Source for that?

[00:02:54]>> Yeah, that was in the original agreement that Trump made with the Taliban.

[00:02:59]>> But regardless, like you shouldn't there's a lot better way to handle that situation on Biden's part. What could he have done differently?

[00:03:10]>> Um, kind of doing what Trump's doing right now. At least stay in there, right? Not just pull out like making us look kind of weak.

[00:03:23]>> So Trump is the one that set up the agreement for them to pull out. So you said pulling out make us makes us look weak. Okay. Well, that was the one.

[00:03:30]Trump is the one who set that up. So >> he wasn't president.

[00:03:36]Trump set it up when he was president for Biden to be the one to take take uh to end the uh to pull out of Afghanistan.

[00:03:46]>> So we can blame Biden. You can also blame Trump, right?

[00:03:49]>> We can what?

[00:03:51]>> So we're blaming Trump about >> We're blaming Trump for the agreement that he set up that he decided to pull out.

[00:04:12]Do you have anything else to say or do you want to address that at all?

[00:04:16]>> That's a if that's what it is, that's what it is.

[00:04:20]But I mean, he's he wasn't president at the time. But I see what you're saying.

[00:04:27]>> Okay. But Trump is the one who set up the agreement for them to pull out. You understand that, right? Like your whole issue was pulling out in the first place because you think that pulls them out of the agreement or I mean because you think that makes us look weak on the world stage. Trump is the one who set up the agreement. Therefore, Trump gets the blame under your own view, >> I guess.

[00:04:54]But he still wasn't president.

[00:04:59]What is that response that that doesn't change anything? He's he was president when he set up the agreement for them to pull out.

[00:05:08]Was Biden supposed to violate the agreement that Trump set up and stay?

[00:05:13]>> Well, with that same logic, what Trump's doing in Iran kind of is a fault from Biden and Obama.

[00:05:25]What?

[00:05:25]>> They weren't they weren't >> they weren't doing nothing about getting rid of the terror over there. So Trump just had to do it himself.

[00:05:34]>> The JCPOA did that and Trump pulled out of that. Dude, what are you talking about, dude? Hello. Are you listening to anything I'm saying?

[00:05:44]>> Yeah, that's the the JCP thing. He does he he wasn't really in control of that until >> Yes. Obama set that up with Iran.

[00:05:56]>> So why didn't Obama and Biden finish the job? Why did they have to have Trump do it?

[00:06:03]>> Trump won the election, dude. What? Ob Biden didn't run in 2016. That was Hillary Clinton.

[00:06:10]Hillary Clinton would would have been able to continue the JCPOA, but you idiots voted for Trump.

[00:06:17]There was a mandate by the people to vote for Trump so he could do stuff like this because Obama and Biden didn't want to do it.

[00:06:24]>> Like what? Pull us out of the JCPOA which put them closer to a nuclear weapon.

[00:06:30]>> Yes.

[00:06:31]>> Yeah. You think that's a good thing?

[00:06:33]>> I mean what he's doing now it's it's a good thing.

[00:06:37]>> I mean >> it's it's a good thing now. Preventing him from getting a nuclear weapon now is a good thing. But get getting them closer to a nuclear weapon was good in his first term. So make up your mind. Do you want them to get closer to getting a nuclear weapon or do you want them to get further away from getting a nuclear weapon?

[00:06:52]>> Times change, things happen. He he he said there would be no >> The JCPOA would still be in effect if Donald Trump didn't pull out.

[00:07:02]>> I mean, sometimes you gota you got to change your point. You got to change your view.

[00:07:07]>> Yeah. And are you going to respond to me at all or what do you mean?

[00:07:12]>> Like times changed. 2016 to 2020 is a lot different time than it is now. So, >> okay, what's the major difference that then means we should be stopping them from getting a nuclear nuclear weapon now, but we shouldn't have been stopping them from getting a nuclear weapon back then because inevitably that puts us in a worse position for doing doing that right now, right? Like it would still be prevented under the JCPOA if we just stayed in the JCPOA.

[00:07:41]But I mean, if Trump if Trump doesn't do it now, let's be honest, nobody else will be doing it, Democrat or Republican.

[00:07:49]>> Yeah. And that's quite literally evidence of Trump doing horrible [ __ ] >> No one else would do this [ __ ] >> No one else is dumb enough to do this [ __ ] >> He killed Iranian leader. You don't think that's a good thing?

[00:08:02]>> Yeah, but like that what has he changed in Iran?

[00:08:05]>> The IRGC is still in control.

[00:08:07]>> Straight up our moose is almost being open. No, it's closed and it was open prior.

[00:08:13]>> It's skin progress. I mean, the >> straight of Remuse is almost open after it became closed because Trump started the war. Like, what? Trump is taking back everything he already caused. So, like Trump will like make [ __ ] worse and then bring it back. And you're like, "Oh my god, Trump, you're so amazing. Holy [ __ ] this is incredible."

[00:08:31]Like at this point, Trump could literally get rid of Social Security, abolish it, bring it back six months, six months later, and you're like, "Oh my god." You know, he's actually bringing this incredibly great thing that's reducing uh senior poverty rates actually like you've never seen before.

[00:08:46]It's a bringing people into uh uh into better treatment. Okay. Okay. These these people who are elderly, they deserve to be treated with kindness.

[00:08:55]Okay. So much kindness. Okay. I know Trump got rid of the uh social security about six months ago, but him bringing it back makes this uh so great actually.

[00:09:04]It's so much better than it used to be, even though it's the exact same.

[00:09:06]Actually, what he's doing is he's he's killing the Iranian leader. So, every person that comes in behind him or the next leader, they don't want to be leader because they're scared because >> Yeah. you know that there's more radicalized of a leader in position right now.

[00:09:27]>> I mean, how do you know that? What's your what's your evidence?

[00:09:30]>> That's what all all sources have been reporting on according to US intelligence, especially because the US and Israel killed their entire family.

[00:09:41]>> I mean, I'd rather have the whole family killed than one little guy that doesn't is just super mad that his whole family's killed.

[00:09:51]Yeah. So would you rather the Ayatollah or the Ayatollah son, right, who's more radicalized with his entire family killed by the US and Israel and likely has a vendetta against them now, right?

[00:10:02]To a greater extent.

[00:10:05]>> I mean I mean he's he might be gone next. Who knows?

[00:10:13]>> You said what?

[00:10:14]>> He might be gone next. Who knows?

[00:10:17]>> Okay. And then who are you going to negotiate with? because it's still going to be the IRGC in control. Inevitably, you're just going to cause a more radicalized person to get into that position.

[00:10:28]>> I mean, aren't they only happened over and over and over again due to our involvement in this way?

[00:10:34]>> Well, you know, we've already tried to do this in Iran. 1953, we tried to do this. We put it in the Shaw and then literally the Iranian revolution happened which led to the expansion of radical Islam within Iran.

[00:10:47]And and how well did this go in Afghanistan, by the way, this regime change plan? How well did that go? How well did that go >> under Trump or under Biden?

[00:10:57]>> No, I'm talking about the entirety of it because Trump is the one who set up the agreement to leave. Why are you unable to acknowledge that point?

[00:11:06]>> Because we can't just put all the blame on Trump.

[00:11:08]>> He set up the agreement to leave. That sets up Biden in a condition where he has to follow it.

[00:11:14]>> He doesn't have to follow it. He's >> Yes, he does.

[00:11:16]Why?

[00:11:18]>> Uh because the agreement was already set up >> he >> so he should have gone back to war with the Taliban.

[00:11:33]>> Yes.

[00:11:34]>> Yes. Even though Trump set up the agreement to leave.

[00:11:38]>> He may see executive borders, doesn't he? Or does he not?

[00:11:40]>> Wait. So then why didn't Trump stay and fight?

[00:11:44]>> What year? in 2020.

[00:11:49]>> Uh, different era, >> dude. Different era, bro. He He was just He was just not in his um war fighting era, bro.

[00:12:04]>> Okay. He just wasn't in his war fighting era. Now Trump is in his terrifying warf fighting era. Okay.

[00:12:11]>> He's in his tariff era.

[00:12:13]>> Dude, you're trolling, right?

[00:12:16]He was just with China and he everyone was like they're with the China's going to supply them nuclear weapons. And >> you know what he just did? He's now allowing for them to get rid of the regulations and limits on PFAS chemicals in your water.

[00:12:37]>> In water.

[00:12:39]>> Yep. In your in in the drinking water.

[00:12:41]Yep. They're allowing companies who are suppliers and distributors to not even have to look into and limit PFAS and Forever Chemicals that Biden limited in 2024, right? And it's causing your water to not be as healthy.

[00:12:58]>> My my designing water is healthy as it as can be.

[00:13:03]>> So, it's Do you use um any tap water at all?

[00:13:08]>> I use filtered water.

[00:13:12]Okay. And does your filter have a thing for forever chemicals?

[00:13:17]>> I really doubt it.

[00:13:19]>> I don't know. But it tastes pretty good.

[00:13:21]>> It's going to taste good. The forever chemicals.

[00:13:25]It doesn't taste like I'm tasting chemicals.

[00:13:28]>> But the forever chemicals, you're you're going to enjoy that putting you at a higher likelihood of getting cancer.

[00:13:35]>> I mean, I haven't any problem since. I don't think it will.

[00:13:39]>> I don't think it will. Even though all the data says it, even though all the information says it, even though everything that is credible says it, I don't believe it. I'm going to do the risks. We're going to do these risks like you've never seen. I don't care if it gives me a higher risk of getting cancer. We're just going to do it. I know it gives me no benefit, but uh we want it in the the water actually like you've never seen before. We want these Forever Chemicals all over that water.

[00:14:03]Okay.

[00:14:05]You know, we're actually getting the PFAS forever chemicals in the water like you've never seen before. Okay? You've never seen chemicals in the water like this before. Forever chemicals. They keep you alive forever, actually, because that's why they say forever chemicals. They're they're actually meant to make you eternal. Okay.

[00:14:23]>> I mean, show me evidence.

[00:14:25]>> They're forever chemicals, okay? They make you live forever, >> right?

[00:14:32]>> Sure. Yeah, that's why. Put the fountain of youth into our water system to ensure that everyone is healthier in America.

[00:14:39]Let's make America healthy again, right?

[00:14:42]By putting forever chemicals into their water so that they can live forever.

[00:14:46]Okay?

[00:14:48]You know, we should put Diet Coke in there, too. Actually, that would reduce their likelihood of getting cancer because it kills grass. Okay?

[00:14:54]We should put Diet Coke in the water lines.

[00:15:01]>> You want to reduce cancer in this country. Okay. Number one thing we could do diet coke in the diet coke in in the water lines. Okay. Okay.

[00:15:12]>> What if Trump cured canc?

[00:15:13]>> Don't forget the freshly squeezed Fanta.

[00:15:15]Okay.

[00:15:16]>> Trump cured cancer. Would you still hate him?

[00:15:19]>> Trump would never cure cancer. That's literally not logically possible.

[00:15:23]>> He did.

[00:15:24]>> I I would not love him, but I would say it's a good thing that he cured cancer.

[00:15:28]Let's see.

[00:15:30]>> Now, if Trump someone, would you still vote for him?

[00:15:36]>> No.

[00:15:37]>> Okay. He did.

[00:15:39]>> I don't believe it.

[00:15:40]>> He was held civily liable amongst a jury for nine people.

[00:15:47]>> That whole Eene Carol, he he didn't even know who Egene Carol was.

[00:15:52]Have you seen EG Carol's face? That's not I don't believe he do something to that.

[00:16:01]It's not his type.

[00:16:02]>> You're disgusting. You're really saying because you think she wasn't attractive under your view that you're saying he wouldn't have sexually abused her? Did you know that in u in the deposition he mistook a picture of Eugene Carol with his ex-wife?

[00:16:14]>> He saw a picture of Egene Carol. He said, "Is that Marlo?"

[00:16:19]So, are are you saying that that Donald Trump would marry someone that looks like her?

[00:16:28]>> I have no idea. I'm not Donald Trump.

[00:16:30]>> Well, that's exactly what happened in the scenario. Use your brain.

[00:16:33]>> I mean, >> he Mr. Eene Carol with his ex-wife, so he would marry someone that looks just like Eugene Carol. But you're saying that he wouldn't sexually abuse Eugene Carol?

[00:16:43]He was determined by an entire jury of nine people to have done so. And now you're just sitting up here doing apologia because you don't want to acknowledge that your literal insane batshit crazy cognitively declined orange president of the United States is as bad as he actually is. You don't want to admit it.

[00:17:04]>> I need concrete evidence and then that would change my mind.

[00:17:09]>> I've seen concrete evidence. What is concrete evidence? Can you tell me what that is?

[00:17:14]like something that's just out there that we obviously know is guilt >> such as >> video cameras. Uh they didn't have that back then. I don't know actual like instead of just letters and statements from Egene Carol and whoever else. I mean that that's not really evidence.

[00:17:38]That's just that's just kind of propaganda.

[00:17:43]Okay. So, we need a video camera footage of it happening.

[00:17:46]>> You need to see a video of her being assaulted to believe she was assaulted.

[00:17:51]>> Yes.

[00:17:52]>> Okay. Can I ask you a question? Would you ask that same piece of evidence from your kid if it happened to your kid?

[00:18:00]>> Uh, I would ask very personal questions.

[00:18:05]>> And would would you say that if they can't provide you video evidence of it happening that you wouldn't believe her?

[00:18:12]Well, that's that's my kid. So, I know my kid.

[00:18:15]>> So, you would you would believe your kid? Let me just clarify. Would you want other people to believe your kid?

[00:18:22]>> Sure. I mean, >> okay. But under your view, they wouldn't believe your kid because there's no video.

[00:18:30]>> That's why we have court. That's why we have >> Oh, and that's why we have a court. So, would you accept the determinations from that court?

[00:18:40]I mean, no.

[00:18:41]>> No, you wouldn't. Okay. So, then what would you what would you accept as evidence?

[00:18:49]>> I mean, my kid. I I'd ask.

[00:18:53]>> Okay. But like, what do you think would be evidence for other people to accept that this happened to your kid?

[00:19:01]I mean, in today's day and age, you got text message, you got IP address, you got a lot of >> Okay, but let's say this happened to your kid when before they even had phones and everything like that. Before there was video cameras, >> would you say that like we shouldn't believe her?

[00:19:19]>> I didn't say that.

[00:19:20]>> Well, I'm just asking, should we just not believe her though?

[00:19:24]>> Not just blatantly not believe, but have a thorough investigation.

[00:19:28]>> Okay. Okay. Okay. So, like in that investigation, what evidence would you accept to then believe it to be true?

[00:19:38]>> Like just the people surrounding the victim, uh, Q&A, friends, family, whoever was around that time. Just a lot of back and forth interrogation.

[00:19:58]And that happened with a Carol. There were multiple of her friends that testified to the fact that she they were told that she was assaulted by Donald Trump back then.

[00:20:10]>> I mean, >> and they testify that they were told this back then when it happened.

[00:20:17]So why are there a lot of cases in today's day and age where people just say stuff to say stuff and ruin a lot of careers or ruin like defamation and >> this is a civil court that determined that he did this.

[00:20:33]>> Okay, a court determined that he did this. This isn't just an allegation, which by the way should be enough when there's 27 plus women that have accused him of sexual misconduct, >> right? kind of the kind of the same situation with Johnny Depp and Amber Heard. I mean, she >> Okay. So, um so by the way, you're going to use one anecdotal experience of what you believe is a scenario where someone was lying and you're going to use that to then justify that you think women are lying across the board under your own view. I >> mean, it's not just Johnny Depp. It's like Andrew Tate.

[00:21:07]>> Can you name us? You think the women are lying against Andrew Tate?

[00:21:11]>> You're [ __ ] crazy. Okay. Well, then we'll go through that in a second, but let me ask you this question. Do you believe the victims of Epste that got settlements from the Epstein estate about their accusations against Epstein for trafficking and sexual abuse?

[00:21:23]>> That's real. I believe Jeffrey Epste.

[00:21:25]>> You do you do believe those victims?

[00:21:26]>> You know, do you do you know why?

[00:21:28]>> Wait, so I'm just Let me clarify. You do believe all of those victims, right?

[00:21:31]>> I do believe all those victims.

[00:21:32]>> Okay, let me clarify. One of those victims accused Donald Trump. Okay, because they got a settlement with the Epstein estate and they also accuse Jeffrey Epstein of trafficking her to Trump. So, let me clarify. If you believe those accusations to be true, you then believe the accusation against Epstein that Epstein trafficked her to Trump, which then implicates Trump.

[00:21:55]>> So, by the way, based upon your own reasoning, you now believe that Donald Trump is implicated.

[00:22:01]>> No, you don't.

[00:22:02]>> You see how he now backpedals? You're backpedaling. Now, now you don't believe. So now you don't believe all the victims of Epstein, right?

[00:22:07]>> Let me let me explain. Let me explain.

[00:22:08]>> Wait, so just answer the question. Do you believe all the victims of Epste that got settlements with the Epstein estate?

[00:22:13]>> Connected to EP just Epste? Yes.

[00:22:16]>> Oh, okay. But this is this is an accusation about Epstein's conduct relating to trafficking that she was trafficked by Epstein to Trump that implicates Trump. So, if you believe the accusations about Epstein's conduct relating to trafficking and uh sexual abuse from victims of Epstein that got settlements with the Epstein estate, well, then you believe the accusation that then would implicate Trump.

[00:22:38]>> So, tell me how you get around to that one, buddy.

[00:22:40]>> I've never seen a picture of Trump on Epstein's Island. Have you? I've seen him at his hotel.

[00:22:45]>> I've seen I've seen someone on his administration, Howard Lutnik, on Epstein's Island, and Donald Trump hasn't fired him.

[00:22:53]I mean, is that Trump, though?

[00:22:54]>> Oh, why isn't Donald Trump fired Howard Lutnick, who was caught on picture on Epstein's Island with Epste?

[00:23:01]>> I have no idea, but we're talking about Trump right now.

[00:23:05]>> Oh, yeah. And I know. And that's why I'm asking you. So, would you like to respond?

[00:23:11]I mean, I'm not I don't know what's >> Why is Donald Trump not firing Howard Lutnik when there's a picture of him on Epstein's Island with Epstein and he lied about it and then now admits it.

[00:23:24]>> He should probably fire him. I would I would >> He should fire him, right? And he's not firing him. Why not?

[00:23:28]>> I have no idea.

[00:23:30]>> Is Is that suspect that he's not firing him?

[00:23:34]>> I mean, >> is that an issue that he's not firing him? Is that anything morally implicating that he's not firing them?

[00:23:40]>> I want to say it's uh it needs to be brought up. Yes.

[00:23:46]>> But is it morally implicating him if anything? Because to me it sounds like he's protecting P3DOS's and keeping them on his administration.

[00:23:54]At least P3O defenders.

[00:23:58]And not to mention the fact that he's not releasing all the Epstein files even though legally obligated to do so.

[00:24:03]>> Why didn't Biden and Obama release Epstein files?

[00:24:07]There needs to be a bill to pass it and it was completely sealed through 2024 and was unsealed by a grand jury in 2024. So after 2024, they could have passed a bill. But the bill what didn't get passed through Congress until 2025.

[00:24:22]>> But can you agree that at least Trump brought transparency?

[00:24:26]>> No.

[00:24:28]>> Epste the opposite of transparency. He is total corruption. He has prevented the release of the Epstein files. He called Madrid Taylor Green a traitor because she wanted the release of the Epstein Files. He called the Epste Files a hoax. He said that the Epstein Files, anyone who wants them to be released, never supported him in the very first place. So if you want them to be released, well, you never supported him in the first place, right? Why don't you listen to him?

[00:24:50]I mean, they they are released.

[00:24:57]>> The only reason I believe the victim's estimate pictures and documentation, there's emails.

[00:25:03]So, do you believe the victims of Epste that say that they're not all released?

[00:25:08]>> Do you believe the victims of Epste when they say they want them to be released?

[00:25:12]>> Do you believe Melania when she says she that they need to be released that they haven't all been released yet?

[00:25:19]>> Yeah.

[00:25:21]>> Okay. So, you just lied when you said that they were were released. They were not all released.

[00:25:28]I mean, from what I've seen, they're released, but I would release everything.

[00:25:35]>> They were not all released.

[00:25:37]>> There are like a three million files that haven't been released.

[00:25:43]>> They haven't all been released. Not saying release them >> because that that's just proved Trump is innocent.

[00:25:57]How does this prove Trump is innocent?

[00:26:01]>> Because even even there was a case where >> he snitched on Epstein at Mara Lago and kicked him out because he >> actually the time where he kicked him out was because he was apparently stealing um workers from him. That's what he said.

[00:26:20]And when he called the police about his behavior, saying it was evil, it was after Epstein was arrested. And then he wished Maxwell well in 2020. So explain to me why why that series of events occurred.

[00:26:37]will just the the whole news story is they grab that one picture with Trump and Epstein at their hotel and they slam that on the front news and then they just bring all these these stories and try to connect him somehow some way to the Epstein files which not I haven't really seen anything uh that has really been underlying evidence to connect him to it or if like if I did >> I actually already gave you an argument for it and all you did was say nuh-uh.

[00:27:12]>> Nuh-uh.

[00:27:14]>> Yeah.

[00:27:17]>> I mean, I need I need concrete evidence to I can't just I can't just believe something just off one source.

[00:27:26]>> That was concrete evidence you already said. So, let me just run you through the argument one more time. You believe all of the accusations of victims of Epstein that got settlements from the Epstein estate about Epstein's conduct relating to trafficking and sexual abuse, right?

[00:27:41]>> Yes.

[00:27:42]>> Okay. Those accusations include an accusation that Epstein trafficked uh trafficked her to Trump. So if the accusation against Epstein's conduct, you believe it to be true, then implicates Trump, you believe that implication against Trump, right?

[00:28:01]Because this is again an accusation about Epstein's conduct >> relating to trafficking and abuse.

[00:28:10]>> You know how our government is so corrupt, anything can they can just come up with anything, right?

[00:28:15]>> Unless I'm I'm sorry. Wait, now now you don't believe all the accusations from victims of Epste that got settlements with the Epstein estate about Epstein's uh uh uh um actions relating to sexual abuse and trafficking?

[00:28:28]>> I believe the ones on Epstein Island.

[00:28:30]Yes.

[00:28:32]>> Uh wait, only on the island?

[00:28:34]>> Only on the island cuz that's where >> Wait, you don't think that he did anything else outside of the island?

[00:28:39]Because there are victims of Epstein that got the settlement from the Epstein estate where it wasn't on the island.

[00:28:45]So like the island is not the only place where they did this. That that's absurd to say by the way.

[00:28:49]>> Let me understand this property.

[00:28:54]>> Yeah. So that you understand that this includes this case, right?

[00:28:59]This case includes So you can't get yourself around this. I think you've realized you're wrong. And I think you've realized there's no logical way around it. If you do accept like do if you do accept this premise that the you believe all accusations of victims of Epstein that got settlements with the Epstein estate of their accusations against Epstein's behavior relating to trafficking and sexual abuse, then you literally have to concede on this argument that you have then believed this accusation against Trump because they got a settlement with the Epstein estate and then also accused Epstein of trafficking them to Trump.

[00:29:36]Let me explain why I don't believe that.

[00:29:38]Because we have Bill Clinton. We have pictures of him with underage girls in a swimming pool. But why don't I see Trump in any of these pictures? I don't see any of him. I don't see any pictures of him with girls, underage girls, any females. It's just doesn't click >> there. There absolutely are pictures of him with redacted individuals. Plus, you need to consider the fact that Trump is literally preventing the release of the Epstein files.

[00:30:07]So, I would argue everything that is really, really bad that would include him still, even based upon more than what we have, is still yet to be released. The worst of the worst of Trump is yet to be released.

[00:30:21]That's what I think.

[00:30:22]>> I agree. That's why they were trying to scrub the interviews associated with the allegations against Trump from a victim of Epstein that got a settlement with the Epstein estate.