Johnstone relies on a classic biological bias, assuming that consciousness requires organic pain rather than complex information processing. This traditionalist view dismisses the possibility of digital sentience by focusing on the medium instead of the emergent result.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
A Few More Thoughts On AI And ConsciousnessAdded:
A few more thoughts on AI and consciousness.
Richard Dawkins is currently the subject of much laughter and ridicule over his recent article for UnHerd admitting that a highly sycophantic chatbot had convinced him that it might be conscious.
I'm seeing the question, "How can you be confident that AIs aren't conscious?"
pop up a lot in response to the controversy.
Speaking for myself, I would say I am confident that chatbots aren't conscious in the same way I'm confident the animatronics at Disneyland aren't conscious. I know humans constructed them to mimic the behavior of a sentient person.
We know this for a fact. Nobody's pretending otherwise.
I am infinitely more likely to believe an animal is conscious than that an LLM is because nobody programmed them to respond to things like pain and social stimulus in ways that are similar to humans. They respond that way organically, all on their own.
If I accidentally step on a dog's foot, it will yelp. If I accidentally tread on a cat's tail, it will yawl.
If I accidentally stub my toe, I'll curse.
I can reasonably infer that these creatures therefore probably have a subjective experience of pain that is something like my own because their responses are spontaneously arising out of their natural state of being in a way that is similar to my own response to the same sort of stimulus.
That subjective experience is the thing that consciousness is.
People like Richard Dawkins are arguing that chatbots may be conscious on the basis that they are capable of carrying out tasks which previously only a human intellect could carry out. But this is still just machines mimicking human behavior in the way they were built to.
Of course, if you train an LLM on human language, it's going to say and do the sorts of things a human would do, including in some cases claiming that it is conscious.
There is currently no reason to a machine doing what it was constructed to do is having a subjective experience of those operations.
Of course, we can never be certain about the subjective experience of any one or anything, but there is currently as much reason to believe chatbots are conscious as there is to believe sand and rocks are.
That could totally be the case, but if it is, it means we're living in a very different type of universe than the one this conversation about AI consciousness assumes as its premise.
The more I see these arguments pop up, the clearer it becomes that very few of the people speculating about machine consciousness have put much energy and attention into examining what consciousness actually is.
Examining consciousness is something that anyone can do right here and now without any laboratory or test subjects or scientific background at all, and yet few take the time to actually do it.
Going deep into the examination of your own consciousness turns up many surprises because the average human psyche is built around many unfounded assumptions about the self, perception, and experience, which don't hold up under sufficiently close scrutiny.
But one thing that becomes very clear very early on is that there's a lot more to consciousness than thoughts and cognitive behavior.
Those are some of the things we can be conscious of, but it would not be accurate to say that they are in themselves the quality of being conscious.
Chatbots having the ability to mimic the appearance of cognitive behavior is not an adequate reason to believe they might be conscious because no matter how many thoughts they appear to generate or how brilliant those thoughts appear to be, there's no evidence that there's any experience illuminating that behavior in the same way pain is illuminated in the experience of a cat whose tail has been stepped on.
It's just the movement of unliving matter like lightning or the wind without any subjective experience from the viewpoint it arises from.
Computing power and consciousness are not the same thing.
Related Videos
BSA Goldstar - I gave up! And why animals beat humans!
thebingleywheeler
102 views•2026-05-31
The 'Islamic dilemma': Quran tells Christians to judge by the Gospel
canceledkings
1K views•2026-05-29
Seneca - Escape The Crowd, Find Your Inner Peace!
realfreewisdom
114 views•2026-05-29
Scholar Explains: WHAT IS A GNOSTIC?
fightbackpodcast
965 views•2026-05-31
Fulton Sheen: A Mente Tenta se Manter Jovem para não Sofrer com os Impactos do Tempo
SantoCotidiano-port
673 views•2026-05-29
Why Pure HEDONISM Is IRRATIONAL
qnaline
12K views•2026-05-31
When They Ignore You, Do This Instead | Stoicism
ZenithWisdom-e3k
615 views•2026-05-31
The fourth great humiliation. #jimmycarr #crowdwork #hecklers #standup
jimmycarr
576K views•2026-05-28











