When a company resolves legal charges through settlement without admitting guilt, it can remove legal overhangs that previously constrained business operations and investor confidence, potentially leading to positive stock price movements and improved market sentiment. The Adani case demonstrates how settling criminal fraud charges can clear a major legal overhang, allowing companies to resume normal business operations and potentially attract more investment, while also highlighting the importance of strong in-house legal teams and corporate governance for managing international legal risks.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Adani Charges Dropped: What It Means for Stocks Markets and India? | The Core ReportAdded:
Good morning. It's Wednesday the 20th of May and this is Govindra Jatsi broadcasting and streaming weekdays from Mumbai India's financial capital. Our top stories and themes. The stock market struggle to hold ground against a falling rupee.
Microsoft is going to roll out its largest data center in India. It says the charts are showing early signals says a new DSP mutual fund report and why large caps make sense. The Trump administration dismisses criminal [music] fraud charges against Gautam Madani following a settlement assessing the legal implications.
[music] This is a call report with Goind Raj at Raj. [music] Petrol and diesel prices rose again on Tuesday morning by 90 per say or less than a rupee this time as we had predicted earlier and of course there will be more raises soon. Last week saw prices of both fuels going up by 3 rupees a liter. The rupee continued its downward journey against the dollar thus also erasing some of the benefits acrewing by raising fuel prices so far.
Given that it will take more rupees to buy the same barrel of oil whose price has been staying high in dollar terms of course. Brent futures for July were at about $11083 a barrel. So around $111 a barrel on Tuesday afternoon. The rupee fell to a record low for a sixth consecutive day ending lower for eight sessions in a row on Tuesday thanks to continued pressures on the external front as well as the war in West Asia which is keeping oil prices high and pushing US Treasury yields higher. according to Reuters which added that the rupee closed at 96 rupees 53 pes the record closing low and it also touched a record intraday low of 96 rupees 61 pes and has now fallen about 6% since the war broke out in late February back to oil government officials said on Monday that state fuel retailers like Indian Oil Corporation and Hindustan Petroleum Corporation among others have been losing 750 cr rupees every day and it has no plans to provide financial support to them sources is at the refining companies told Reuters that more price hikes are needed to recoup the losses. India is the world's third largest importer and consumer of oil and was also one of the last major economies to raise retail fuel prices after the war started on the 28th of February. In keeping with all of this, the market struggled to stay in the positive despite some scattered foreign portfolio and domestic institutional buying. In recent days, the Nifty50 and Sensex lost all their intraday gains and the Nifty50 was down 31 points to close at 23,618 and the Sensex was down 114 points to close at 75,200.
For all the turmoil everywhere, capital market link stocks did very well with the Nifty Capital Market Index hitting a 52- week high. Stock prices of BSC that's the Bombay stock exchange and the multicommodity exchange of India that's MCX both hit their respective record highs according to a report in the business standard [music] we'll be tracking direct investments a little more closely now given all the gloom around Microsoft has said it is rolling out India's largest data center in Hyderabad this year which means in a few months and it's on track to open by mid 2026, its country head said on Tuesday while speaking to Reuters, even as it spends heavily to bolster its position in one of the world's largest markets for AI services. Microsoft's India president told Reuters that there's massive demand for Azure cloud services and its $30 a month co-pilot 365 AI assistant. Last year it had said that it would invest about $17.5 billion in India and that would also make it its biggest outlay in Asia in addition to another 3 billion that it committed at the beginning of 2025 and this includes that new data center in Hyderabad where it already has a significant presence.
Elsewhere, food and beverages major PepsiCo said it'll invest about 5,700 crores in India by 2030 or in the next four years, mostly to ramp up capacity of its food business. According to its India and South Asia CEO, the investment is primarily for the concentrates plant in Madhya Pradesh and snacks plants in Assam and Tamil Nadu. PepsiCo posted a revenue of about 9,800 cr rupes at the end of December and a profit after tax of about 95 cr rupees.
[music] Shares of Adani Group companies rose on Tuesday by about 5% after the Trump administration moved to dismiss criminal fraud charges against Adani Group founder Gotham Adani. The US Justice Department on Monday moved to drop charges accusing Adanian associates of paying bribes to secure power supply contracts in India and Adani Enterprises separately settled allegations tied to LPG gas imports from Iran. And these are of course two separate cases. One case is to do with Adani's buying Iranian sanctioned energy between November 23 and June 25. For this, Adani, the firm has agreed to pay $275 million to settle its potential civil liability for apparent violations of OFAC or the Office of Foreign Assets Control sanctions on Iran. According to an official statement, the company had purchased shipments of liqufied petroleum gas or LPG from a Dubai based trader that purported to supply Omani and Iraqi gas but overlooked red flags apparently indicating that the supplies originated in Iran, CNBC quoted the US regulator saying. In the other case, the US Department of Justice said it would drop criminal charges in a bribery and fraud probe against Gotham Madani.
According to a report by the Wall Street Journal on Monday, the Department of Justice move was anticipated after the Securities and Exchange Commission last week moved to settle its civil lawsuit against Adani and his nephew Saga Adani.
According to CNBC, which added that the SEC's civil lawsuit had alleged the two men misled investors as part of a bribery and fraud scheme tied to solar contracts in India, the same charges that were being investigated by the Department of Justice as well. The Wall Street Journal report said the Department of Justice reviewed the case and decided not to devote further resources to these criminal charges against Adani and others. In 2024, a New York federal court had indicted Adani along with seven others on charges related to quote unquote massive bribery and fraud scheme which the Adani group had denied as baseless. Court filings indicated Goautam Adani agreed to pay $6 million and Saga Adani $12 million without admitting or denying wrongdoing.
The BBC reported that Adani Group has now resolved all three legal cases against it in the US which will pave the way for them to travel to the US without risk of legal proceedings. The BBC also quoted other reports saying that the drop charges reflect a broader move away from prosecuting foreign bribery cases under the current administration. The New York Times reported citing sources that the lawyer said Adani would invest about $10 billion in the US and create 15,000 jobs if prosecutors dropped the charges against him, which was a pledge that he had made to Trump shortly after the latter won the 2024 presidential election. While the first case is to do with buying sanctioned energy and perhaps could be viewed a little more lightly, the second of course is an allegation of bribery of officials in India. While the case is now settled in the US, what lesson does this hold for the Arani group in general and for companies in specific? I reached out to corporate lawyer Ryan Karanjavala and began by asking him how he was seeing the outcome of the bribery case.
>> Let me start with the putting a cable out there as a group is a client of mine and Gautam Alani is a personal friend but at no stage have I acted in this matter. So my knowledge of the matter would be a distant one from what we can read in the papers. You know the intricacies of what happened, what was argued is not something you'll be able to get out of me. The first takeaway for them obviously is that they're in a much better position today than they were yesterday because now so there is no criminal case pending against them which had been pending since I think the November of 24. Obviously any such case has a dampening effect on the amount of business that you can do at least internationally. So the first thing I think is that they will now be able to again sort of up their gear by gears by one or two notches and go full throttle which is normally what they would like to do. So the first takeaway is that they have a clean slate before them and they can go ahead and do as much business abroad and in America as they want to do without any fetter in their way. The other advantage is that once there is no criminal case pending against you and there are no in fact no cases pending against you in America your ability to raise capital should obviously increase and that ability of yours should obviously be strengthened.
Third takeaway would be that I'm quite sure that in these years in which they sort of had to work in America to sort of sort this matter out they would also have become much more familiar with the American terrain. So in a sense this learning though it wasn't in the way in which they would have liked it may well come to their benefit in the years to come when they do more business in America if they do more business in America.
>> Right. And which looks like they will because they've committed $10 billion of investments. That's what I read.
>> Okay. I understand that the case was represented really by lawyers in America. Now the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act which was applied in this case is that something that could be opened up at a later stage? Not unless they come out with something new. If they find out that something happened in another matter, then of I mean the law is always out there. But nothing under this case.
>> Right. In your understanding, when there are settlements like this, is there an admission of guilt? Is it an acknowledgement of an event that's happened?
>> So from what the papers tell us, they've been very clear in saying that there is no admission of guilt. There may be settlements in which there are admissions of guilt. But this doesn't seem to be one of them. This is not obviously the only case that has ever been settled in America. So there may be cases where people have said, "All right, I admit to this, but you know, I plead guilty, but let's settle it with a fine." This doesn't seem to be one of those cases. This is a case where they seem to have got a clean chit in, so to speak, without any admission of guilt.
>> So a slightly broader question.
Obviously American law works differently and there is the ability to compound offenses and India too we can do that in some few cases in corporate law but how would the two situations work rather the same situation in India versus America >> recently if you noticed it was quite a sort of a high-profile case there was something called serial so the Supreme Court settled it and broadly quashed all prosecutions against them on their payment of certain backlog of abuse etc. That's the broad understanding of what I have of that case and I think they use their path under article 142 but I'm not 100% sure on that. So even in India in some cases we find that even the courts are moving in that direction that gives you scope for a larger debate which is that as the years go by as business become more prominent a part of national life. Should you move toward heavy fines by way of punishment rather than long periods of incarceration or intermittent periods of incarceration where you go in and out of jail till you get bailed and so on. So this is a debate for the future and it may well take place in the future.
>> I mean in keeping with uh your train of thought would you say that you know one of the things that many people are uncomfortable about in India is the criminalization of many acts including in doing business. So you feel that the positive way of looking at it is that we should be also maybe decriminalizing and allowing more compounding of offenses.
>> Yeah I think so and I'll tell you why.
Many years ago a friend of mine told me one thing. This was close friend of mine. He was a finance minister. So friend of mine one day told me he said you know you should tell Aron one thing and I did actually he said well people who create jobs don't sleep well at night then they won't create jobs. So that's something you need to keep in the back of your mind when you're making policy. You know the point is of course anybody who has violated the law must be penalized. The question is to what extent how often and with what ferocity.
And this is a debate that will go on because you know today increasingly as India becomes more industrial as people are asked to invest more and more in the country as you seek foreign investment if the whole process of business in India is fraught with potential liabilities then people are always cautious. I'll give you my own example.
I have over the years studiously avoided coming onto any board. There's one board which I recently accepted but that's like almost like a government company.
So it's it's Petronet LNG. So that's sort of a government side to it and the result of it is a safer board to be on because otherwise I still remember my old days friend of mine called Sudaja who was a partner of Crawford Bailey as he said he was reading the morning paper and Faki got a arrest warrant because some company of Ashok Ba had polluted something somewhere in India. These are things you need to look at a little more closely and maybe from the other side of the you're going to suddenly find people not willing to get onto panels. I remember another friend of mine said Malik my wife you know we need more women directors so why don't we just put her on our board I said out of the question and we got mad something I was told my children my daughter and lynch me you were not going on anyone you put mom on it is something that you need to think through I think a lot of these laws were made when things were not so active in so far as you know arrest etc were prevalent so let me flip it around in a manner of speaking so the criminal charge for paying $250 million in bribes by the Adanis for securing solar energy supply contracts. Now this case does not appear in India anywhere as such or it doesn't seem to appear. I haven't gone into it but is there any admission that they actually paid that money here? I mean if they actually paid that money here then you would have a whole lot of PL file saying why aren't you prosecuting not only the guy who paid the bribe but also the guy who took it.
So I don't think there is actually any finding or any real tangible evidence though I'm not studying the case. I'm just speaking from a layman's point of view to show that that kind of money was actually paid.
>> Right. But I'm assuming there is some evidence because there was a case filed in Brooklyn.
>> Maybe some primacy sort of first look at oh I think it is kind of evidence. It's possible.
>> Okay. So, but my question is I know like you've not appeared in this case so neither of us know those details but because the American system is maybe despite the compounding or the possibility of compounding is a fairly let's say non-influencable system or at least was. So to that extent do you feel there is a taint that's left behind because of all of this and I'm still speaking only about this case not the other one.
>> No a taint on whom?
>> Taint on the Adani family in this case.
See frankly what they have got is a clean chit. Now I don't really at least in law they can walk away saying we have never been prosecuted we've never been held guilty. Now if in social conversation people say no no but we don't believe that I can't say.
>> Okay. So what would you advise Indian companies who are obviously you know investing or doing crossber investments and are likely to you know face some kind of scrutiny outside as well in addition to here which of course others have been to. Is there any general advice or takeaway from this case or similar cases?
>> One advice that I always give Indian industrialist if they ever get down to asking me and I remember I had given it while we were doing the Arsel or Mitchell case. I remember having a long conversation with Adita Mitt on this across the spectrum. I feel that the Indian industrialist is willing to spend crazy amounts of money when he dragged to court. You know, they spend any amount of money but they don't invest in equal measure in a legal in-house team.
You know a friend of mine Baramaki who's a partner of AZB, he once said something which I always remembered. He said the general council of GE sat on the board with Jack Wes. If Jack Wes wanted to do something and the general council said no, Jack Wes couldn't do it. I feel that the one area where the Indian industrialist doesn't pay enough attention is his own in-house general council and the advice that they give.
You know, you have to have people of a caliber who will come forward first who will know their stuff and then come forward and put it to you brutally whether you're an owner, whether you're a professional, whether you like it or you don't like it. And there should be checks and balances for the general council to be able to alert the board that this is something that should not be done. There should be some internal kind of checks and balances. So when you go abroad, I think every industrialist must sort of take a leaf from the foreign company. the foreign company in the big corporations abroad a general council's word on matters of legality is virtually fine nobody can start saying no no no we'll manage this and we'll manage that because they won't so I think that is one thing I would always advise if people were to ask me >> it's a good note to end on Mr. Karan, thank you so much for joining me.
>> Thank you.
>> A new report by DSP Mutual Fund has made a fresh case for investing in the markets via the systematic investment plan SIP, which would of course be expected. The report titled early signals through charts also argues that the nifty's forward price to book has slipped below its long period average which is important because price to book is a more balance sheet anchored valuation measure than price to earnings especially when earnings are volatile.
The report says it also argues that average valuations are not easy to find in real time and long-term averages include crisis level lows and prices of course are not forecastable. The signal the report says is to increase equity allocation within guard rails and this is also not a peak return on equity valuation and corporate return on equity in this cycle are yet to move meaningfully higher which makes the current price to book closer to fair value and potentially more attractive if returns on equity improve from here according to the report. I reached out to Sahil Kapoor head of products and market strategist at DSP and author of the report and here are some extracts from the conversation the full version of which will be on our YouTube channel this evening.
So if I were to look at a more practical view, if we are in May 2026 and let's say the last one year the markets have been not very good but the four years before that or 3 and a half years before that they've done well. So where do people who've invested whether lumpsum or SIP rolling in the last 5 years where do they stand broadly? I'm talking about an industry median. So had they invested let's say 5 years ago they'll be sitting on handsome gains no doubt about it.
their kager will be upwards of 15% in most cases if they had not made any mistakes >> and this you're saying across the industry even the worst performing funds would have delivered something >> I think yeah if you look at let's say a normal equity fund they have done well just because markets have done so well second is that if you invested one year ago in let's say lump sum then you are at no gains you will be breaking even or maybe slightly under the water so that is where we stand today so which obviously brings one to the question about what is it about the next four years that could so magically change to use your word things and deliver much better returns than it has been for the last year.
>> Sure. I have no idea. I don't know what will change in next four years. So how should we prepare for it is something which we can think about. First is that recent high returns is a recipe for forward low returns. So if you're sitting for example let's say we said that 12% is our long-term historical ker for Nifty. So if you are getting 20%.
Then let's assume that 12% is going to continue. We don't know but let's say which means that you are already far away from your long-term median. So if you start at that point there is a good possibility that your future returns will be much lower. Second is now because in the last 18 to 24 months returns are much more muted. I think it'll probably give us some confidence that at least average returns or you know somewhere close to that is possible. So your froth is more or less absent. Second is valuations. For a long period of time, India traded at a very very high premium in terms of valuation.
We are still not cheap but there are lot of buckets or pockets in the market which have become cheap. So as an investor you can pick pockets be in those areas and then probably expect that over a period of time you'll come out better. We should continue to pick large caps. Maybe it is a continuation of what we wrote last year also or before that also. The simple reason being that smid or small and midcaps if they trade at a premium to large caps and they continue to show earnings growth which is similar to large cap then you don't need to pay a very high multiple for them. For example, if a large cap is trading at 18 times multiple doing 10 12% earnings growth has an ROE of 16 17%. If a midcap has the same ROE profile which very few have and earning gross is also similar there is no reason for me to pay a premium for it right and therefore it's much better to stick with high quality large caps rather than go and dilute yourself in a small and midcap space and you're saying this because of experience or bad experience I think it's plain simple logic why will you overpay for investment which produces a very similar experience in terms of shareholder outcome so if you can buy an investment which is cheaper you know why not buy it >> right but many I don't know about DSP and you can maybe highlight it many funds also have small cap schemes >> absolutely >> so in which case you are investing in them and how have those performed versus the others >> I think the performance for the category itself has been muted no doubt about it but of course when even when you go to small and midcaps you need to know what type of businesses are you investing in so if you look at the mid universe it's about 400 stocks so about 2 years ago you could find less than 25% or less than 100 stocks which traded in the bottom 30 percentile of valuation. So it was not easy to find you know investments in that space and if you fast forward 2 years the returns are you know not very high compared to what they were earlier today I think that number is slightly edged up so you might find a few more bargains but it is not easy so it's like where is the easier hunting ground today that is how you should think about it but yeah of course we run a small cap we run a midcap and we've been telling all our investors to be more SIP focused in small and midcaps you talked about investing in SIPs as an approach to this thing and you talked about being methodical. So can you sum up for us how all of this that we've spoken of should convert into a strategy for investing today and if you've not started already and why SIPs make sense.
See as an investor if I'm part of the financial market I'm exposed to a lot of noise. So first thing is that we should cut down on noise. Looking at price quotes and social media or a continuous stream of news every single second I don't think it's very healthy for your financial health. First is cut down on that. Second is create a method. So SIP is a method. It provides you automated way of investing. As I said earlier, it will give you an average experience over a period of time. And average experience is very rare as I showed you in numbers earlier. So one simple idea is a pick up a flexi cap equity fund, do a SIP and forget about it and let it do its work over a very long period of time. B, if you don't want whole acity in your portfolio. If you're afraid of swings, go for a multi-asset portfolio which will have a mix of many assets and do a SIP in that portfolio and forget about it. I think these two are the best single methods which are over a period of time tax efficient and they can create compounding. But multiasset at least in this structure these structures do not include let's say an overseas exposure.
>> They do lot of multi assets do. So for example DSV multiasset allocation fund with buy structure itself we started with a large allocation to global stocks. So they provide you that you know extra diversification has in that particular scheme has that outperformed the other assets in the last year or so.
>> Yes it has. I'll tell you that 25% one-year return out of that 24 came from overseas. So you can imagine that it had a very big bearing on you know what happened. So some of the companies that are being spoken about today like an SK highex etc all was part of the portfolio about 18 months ago and where do you buy SK highex >> directly the stock because these portfolios are enabled to buy in Korea.
So you're saying Indian fund can buy in Korea as well. Yeah these funds who are enabled for overseas investments yes they can buy.
>> The full interview as we said will be out at 5:00 p.m. today on our YouTube channel. So do subscribe at the link in the description to make sure that you don't miss it.
>> [music] >> That was the core report with me Govindraj Ethi. Do stay connected with more of our coverage at the core. You can check out our website or sign up to our newsletter for our exclusive stories. One in-depth feature a day on www.thecore.in.
Do also track us on LinkedIn where we usually post [music] synopsis or extracts of our top stories and interviews. We would love your feedback on how we can make business more [music] interesting and relevant including of course India's vibrant manufacturing sector. So write [music] to us at feedback atthecore.in and thank you once again [music] for listening.
Related Videos
The #1 Reason Your Top People Keep Leaving (How to Fix It)
Entreleadership
470 views•2026-05-29
What Happens After A Motorcycle Dealership Shuts Down?
FastestWay.1
374 views•2026-05-29
The Evolution of DSP's Pokemon Unpack-ack-acking Grift
Toxicity_Unmasked
2K views•2026-05-29
Help re-structure my finances, I want to buy a house, save and invest
JennNxumalo
2K views•2026-05-29
Asian Paints Q4 Results: Revenue Beats Estimates, 5 Key Takeaways For Investors
NDTVProfitIndia
111 views•2026-05-29
Trying to Afford Vancouver on a Single Income | $2,550 Mortgage
chelseaspursuit
308 views•2026-05-28
AI Investment: Data Centers & The Bottom Line
MemeTeamClips
134 views•2026-05-28
Are you busy but still feeling broke?
TaraWagner
305 views•2026-06-01











