In the Mahāli Sutta, the Buddha teaches that supernormal powers like divine sight and hearing are not the goal of the holy life but merely lawful products of one-sided concentration training; the true purpose of meditation is the elimination of mental fetters and corruptions, leading to the four noble fruits (stream-entry, once-returning, non-returning, and arahantship), which represent irreversible structural changes in the practitioner rather than states to be achieved.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Mahāli Sutta (DN6): The Discourse to the Nobleman Mahāli — What the Holy Life is Actually ForAdded:
Hello and welcome to the Paliverse podcast series where the great discourses of the Polycanon are opened up and carefully examined in language anyone can follow and at a depth that honors the teachings.
>> I am Serene and this is Alexander.
Before we begin, a word about how this podcast comes to you. Our voices are created using artificial intelligence from the Paliverse project team. The voices are modern technology, but what we bring you is ancient wisdom. Every word of teaching comes directly from the Pali Cannon, the authentic teachings of the historical Buddha.
>> And because accuracy matters more to us than anything else, every script is carefully reviewed and corrected by human experts before it reaches you.
There is no personal agenda here. No bias, no opinions of our own. We are here simply to let the teachings speak.
Before we step into the discourse itself, here is a brief overview of what this suta is about. We are examining the Mahali Suta, the sixth discourse of the long collection.
A liar nobleman named Mahali comes to the Buddha at Visali with a puzzle. He reports to him a conversation he had had with a man named Sunkata who had spent three years training near the Buddha.
During that time, Sunnakata was able to see divine forms, the visible bodies of beings on subtler plains. However, he was unable to hear divine sounds. He told this to Maharali and Maharali brings the puzzle directly to the Buddha. Did the divine sounds simply not exist or did Sunnakata fail to hear sounds that were really there? What unfolds from that question is a step-by-step teaching about what concentration of the mind actually produces and what the holy life is actually for. The Buddha explains that Sunaata's failure to hear divine sounds was due to his practice of one-sided concentration ekansavito samadi and not due the non-existence of divine sounds. He shows how a meditator's supernormal sense, divine sight or divine hearing is the precise product of one-sided or bothsided training in concentration.
Nothing more, nothing hidden. From this, Mahali draws an inference. He concludes that such developments of concentration must be the goal of the holy life. The Buddha tells him plainly no and defines what the goal actually is.
The four noble fruits ending in arahansship with the liberation of mind and liberation by wisdom that are without mental corruptions.
Asava and the path to the noble fruits, the noble eight-fold path.
The discourse then closes with a separate exchange.
The Buddha narrates from another time.
Two wanderers had once asked him whether the soul ja is the same as the body or different.
The Buddha walked them through the meditative absorptions, the supernormal knowledges and finally the elimination of the mental corruptions showing that only at the last stage does the soul and body question itself dissolve. That exchange shows what the highest fruit in particular accomplishes that nothing below it does.
>> Let us begin where the suta begins. The blessed one is staying at Visali in the great wood at the pinnacled hall.
>> At that time Brahman messengers from the kingdoms of Kosula and Magada are in Visali on official business. They hear of the aesthetic Gautama and want an audience.
Around the same time, the lichavi nobleman Otada known by his given name Mahali arrives at the pinnacled hall with a great assembly of lichavis.
He too wants an audience. The Buddha is in seclusion.
Word is sent through a young novice named Siha. The Buddha emerges and is seated.
>> Mahali speaks first. He tells the Buddha what brought him. A few days earlier, Sunnakata, the lichavi's son, had come to him. Sunata said, "In the time I have been near the blessed one, just 3 years, I see divine forms. Dear connected with sensual pleasure, enticing, but I do not hear divine sounds. Dear connected with sensual pleasure, enticing."
So, Mahali asks, "Did Sunna not hear divine sounds that exist or that do not exist?"
>> The Buddha answers him directly, "The sounds exist." Sunakata failed to hear them. And then, instead of stopping there, the Buddha lays out the precise reason.
Concentration of the mind, he explains, is not a single undifferentiated power.
It is developed for one specific purpose at a time. A monk can develop concentration of the mind one-sidedly in any direction. For the seeing of divine forms, he will see them. He will not hear divine sounds. He can develop it one-sidedly for the hearing of divine sounds. He will hear them. He will not see divine forms. He can develop it bothidedly for both. Then he will see and hear. The Buddha walks through this with directional precision. The eastern direction, the southern, the western, the northern, above, below, and across, making it clear that the principle holds in every quarter.
>> Notice what this does to the puzzle.
Sunkata did not fail to hear because the sounds were absent. He did not fail because something was hidden from him.
He failed because his training was one-sided. The supernormal sense he attained and the one he did not are simply what specifically directed concentration of the mind training produces or not. They are the lawful product of how the meditator points his practice. They are real. They are also in the Buddha's framing here lateral.
They sit off to the side of the question of what the practice is ultimately for.
>> Mahali listens and then he draws an inference.
If concentration of the mind developed in both directions yields divine sight and divine hearing together, this must be the highest attainment in the Buddha's dispensation. This must be the goal. He puts the inference as a question. Surely, venerable sir, it is for the realization of these concentration of the mind developments that monks live the holy life under the blessed one.
>> The Buddha's reply is the structural pivot of the entire suta. No indeed, Mahali. It is not for the realization of these that monks live the holy life under me. There are other things more superior, more sublime, for the sake of which monks live the holy life under me.
Whatever attainment the meditator might point to, even an attainment as striking as divine sight, even bothsided concentration of the mind that yields perception across all directions. It is not what the holy life is for. Mahali asks the only sensible next question.
What then are those things? The Buddha names them. They are four. With the elimination of three mental fetterss, identity view, skeptical doubt, and adherence to moral rules and austerities.
In the belief that only in this way does purification occur, a person becomes a stream enterer, no longer subject to fall into lower realms, fixed in destiny, heading for full enlightenment.
With those same three mental fetterss already eliminated and with greed, hate and delusion weakened, he becomes a once returner, returning to this world only one more time before making an end of suffering.
With the elimination of the five lower mental fetterss, the same three plus sensual desire and ill will, he becomes a non- returnturner, taking spontaneous birth in a higher realm and attaining final liberation there, never to return.
With the elimination of the mental corruptions in this very life, having directly known and realized it for himself, he attains the liberation of mind and the liberation by wisdom that are free of these mental corruptions.
The five higher mental fetterss, desire for fine material existence, desire for immaterial existence, conceit, restlessness, and ignorance have by this point also fallen away.
Nothing of the 10 remains.
>> Notice how the Buddha names each of these four, not by what is achieved, but by what is eliminated.
mental fetterss, mental corruptions, residues of greed, hate and delusion.
And by what becomes impossible, falling into lower realms, returning to this world, returning at all. The fruits are not states the practitioner enters and exits. They are irreversible structural changes in what he is. This is what the holy life is for.
>> Mahali asks the path. The Buddha names it in full. Right view, right thought, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness, right concentration of the mind. The eight together, the morality factors, the wisdom factors and the concentration of the mind factors are what carry the practitioner to the four fruits.
Concentration of the mind is one of the eight. It is not the destination.
>> This could have been the natural place for the discourse to end. Mahali has asked his question. The Buddha has answered it. The goal has been named.
The path has been named. But the discourse takes one more step. And this is where it goes deepest.
>> The Buddha tells Mahali about a separate occasion. He had once been staying at Kosambi in Kosita's park. Two wanderers had approached him there. Mundia the wanderer and Jalia the disciple of Darupatika.
They came with the great metaphysical question of their time. Is the soul the same as the body or is the soul one thing and the body another?
They wanted a position from him. They wanted him to take a side.
>> The Buddha did not take a side. Instead, he laid out a sequence. He took the case of a person who hears the teaching, goes forth, completes the training in morality, then enters and dwells in the first meditative absorption.
The Buddha asked the wanderers, "Would such a person, knowing and seeing in this way, be entitled to say the soul is the same as the body, or the soul is one thing and the body another?" The wanderer said, "Yes." From where he stood, such a statement would seem available to him. And the Buddha said, "I friends know and see in this way and yet I do not say."
>> He carried the same exchange through the second meditative absorption, then the third, then the fourth. He carried it through the inclining of the mind toward knowledge and vision. The same order of supernormal seeing the first part of the suta had described.
At each stage, the wanderer said the meditator would seem entitled to make such a statement. At each stage, the Buddha said, "I know, I see, and yet I do not say."
>> Then he came to the final stage, the elimination of the mental corruptions, the knowledge, this is the last birth.
There will be no further coming into being. Here the answer changed. At this stage the Buddha said, "It is not proper for such a person to say the soul is the same as the body or the soul is one thing and the body another." And again, I friends know and see in this way. And yet I do not say, "Notice what this shows." At every stage below the final one, the meditator is still working through his six sense faculties and the mind that processes them. His experience is real. His concentration of the mind is genuine. His perceptual range may be extraordinary.
But whatever he says about soul and body is still a conclusion drawn from sense mediated experience. Speculation built on what the senses and the mind deliver.
The frame within which the question can be asked is intact.
None of those attainments dissolves the frame. Only at the final stage, the elimination of the mental corruptions, does the whole process that produce such speculation give way. And it gives way not because the practitioner has chosen one side of the question or the other.
It gives way because the cause that produces such questions has been uprooted.
In density view sakai the deep assumption that there is a soul or a self to locate somewhere with respect to the body is gone. The question stops applying not refused not avoided. There is simply nothing left for it to apply to.
>> This is why the Buddha himself who knows and sees does not say. To say the soul is the same as the body or the soul is different from the body would be to speak as though the frame still applied.
It does not. The arahant silence on this question is not evasion. It is the mark of what the path completes.
>> Now the whole discourse holds together.
The supernormal powers real as they are are not the goal. They are the lawful product of one-sided training lateral to what the practice is for.
The four noble fruits are the goal and they are named not by what is achieved but by what is eliminated and what becomes impossible.
The path is the noble eight-fold path eight factors together of which concentration of the mind is one and the highest fruit in particular accomplishes what nothing below it accomplishes.
It cuts the question of soul at its root. Not the answer to the question, the question itself.
>> That is what monks live the holy life under the Buddha for. That is what the holy life is for.
>> Everything you have heard so far was built from the root text of this discourse spoken originally to an audience who sat in the Buddha's presence, who shared his world, who could hear his tone and ask their questions.
The commentaries exist because later generations were no longer in that presence. For centuries, scholar monks worked to preserve the understanding those first listeners carried. The backstories, the precise meanings, the context the suta could take for granted.
Four explanations deepen what we have just heard.
>> The first explanation concerns why Sunakarta failed to hear divine sounds.
The root text says only that his training had been one-sided. The commentary looking at the same passage asks what was actually driving him.
It tells us had asked the Buddha for the preparatory practice of the divine ear and the Buddha had not given it. The reason was not what Sunakata thought. In a past life, Sunnakata had struck a virtuous monk on the ear and made him deaf. That past act had made him constitutionally incapable in this life of attaining the divine ear knowledge.
Practicing the preparatory exercises would not have produced the result. The Buddha withheld a practice that could not bear fruit.
>> The second explanation concerns what happened to Sunna afterwards. The root text leaves him simply as the source of the report Mahali brings. The commentary tells us he became resentful.
He concluded the Buddha was hiding the practice from him out of jealousy. Both of them were of the warrior cast and surely the Buddha did not want a rival.
He gradually disroed and returned to lay life and from there he told his story to Mahali.
The sub commentary adds something sharper. At the moment the resentment took root, the meditative attainments and supernormal knowledges he had already gained began to fall away. The texts present this as concurrent. The anger and the loss happened together.
>> The third explanation concerns why the wanderer's episode is in this suta at all. From the root text alone, it can look like an unrelated coder. The Buddha answering one question and then telling a story from another time and place. The commentary names the connection. Mahali it says held the view the material body rupa is the self ata that the self can simply be identified with the body.
Because of that view his mind would not settle on the teaching. The Buddha brought up the wanderer episode to surface that view and dismantle it. With this note in hand, the third part of the suta is no longer a coda. It is the deepest layer of the same teaching addressed precisely to the man sitting in front of him. The fourth explanation concerns what the meditative absorptions can and cannot do. The subcommentary makes the point with precision by the mere attainment of the absorptions. It says a person is not yet doctrally disentangled.
Even the meditator who has reached the four absorptions and the supernormal knowledges is still inside the frame in which soul same as body can be said.
The dissolution of the frame is the work of the path of wisdom of the elimination of the mental corruptions not of concentration of the mind. Concentration of the mind carries the practitioner to a particular place. The path carries him out. So much for what the tradition adds. Now let us bring this back to where we started to your own experience.
The pattern this suta diagnoses taking what concentration of the mind produces and treating it as the goal is one anyone serious about practice has to face.
a particular state of clarity, a particular feeling of openness, a particular insight that arrived once and has been sought ever since.
The Buddha's answer here is direct.
These are not the goal. They may be real. They may be products of genuine training. They are not what the practice is for.
>> What it is for is named precisely in this discourse. the four noble fruits and the highest of them not as a higher state placed on top of the others but as the dissolution of the very assumption that has been generating the search all along. So the practice you can take from this episode is this. When something arises in your meditation that feels like the answer, pause and notice it.
Notice the wanting that something be the answer. That noticing of how a state of practice presents itself and what is below it is itself the practice the Buddha is pointing to. Not a preparation for the practice, the practice itself.
And with each repetition, the question, what am I really? Begins to lose its urgency.
The states that arose and sought to be the answer become simply states. The path that was the path all along becomes more visible underneath.
>> If you would like to read the Maharali Suta for yourself, please visit paliverse.org.
You will find the original suta there in all three of its traditional layers. The text and the two layers of commentary that have accompanied it along with many other discourses we are working through in this series. And if you have questions about anything we have explored today, what the divine sight and divine hearing actually are, why Sunnakata failed in his training, what the four noble fruits are in detail, or why the arahant remains silent on the question of soul and body, you can ask them directly on palverse.org.
Paliverse will answer you there interactively, drawing on the canon and its commentaries. Thank you for spending this time with us today on our Palverse podcast. We have walked through the Mahali Suta in the company of the tradition that has carried it through the centuries.
>> Until next time, may you be well and may the question, "What am I?" loosen its grip on you with every sitting until the frame in which it once felt urgent gives way of its own accord and the freedom the path completes opens finally where it has always been.
Related Videos
BSA Goldstar - I gave up! And why animals beat humans!
thebingleywheeler
102 views•2026-05-31
The 'Islamic dilemma': Quran tells Christians to judge by the Gospel
canceledkings
1K views•2026-05-29
Seneca - Escape The Crowd, Find Your Inner Peace!
realfreewisdom
114 views•2026-05-29
Scholar Explains: WHAT IS A GNOSTIC?
fightbackpodcast
965 views•2026-05-31
Fulton Sheen: A Mente Tenta se Manter Jovem para não Sofrer com os Impactos do Tempo
SantoCotidiano-port
673 views•2026-05-29
Why Pure HEDONISM Is IRRATIONAL
qnaline
12K views•2026-05-31
When They Ignore You, Do This Instead | Stoicism
ZenithWisdom-e3k
615 views•2026-05-31
The fourth great humiliation. #jimmycarr #crowdwork #hecklers #standup
jimmycarr
576K views•2026-05-28











