The bond market is awakening as 'bond vigilantes' discipline policymakers, with yields hitting 30-year highs in Japan and 20-year highs in Europe, signaling that the era of easy money and financialization is ending. The Fed's ability to cut rates against rising inflation is severely constrained, creating a 'golden age for stock picking' where active managers can outperform by focusing on fundamentals rather than relying on market support. The 60/40 portfolio model is dead, and investors must avoid 'buy the dip' mentality, instead focusing on long resources and short consumer-tech spreads while recognizing that many stocks are in bubbles due to unsustainable margins, not high P/E ratios.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
George Noble: Fed's Hands Tied, Bond Vigilantes Waking Up, Buy the Dip Dead, Margin of Safety ThinAdded:
George Noble, CIO of Noble Capital Advisors. Welcome back to the show.
Great to see you as always, George.
Thanks so much for taking the time.
>> Thanks for having me, Julia. Always a pleasure to be on.
>> Always a pleasure. And George, our last conversation was at the beginning of February, and it feels like a lot's already happened since that time. So, if you don't mind, let's step back and do the big picture macro view update for you. Um, what's changed? What's been reinforced? what's been on your radar of late when it comes to the economy and the markets. And as you know, George, you can take all the time you need to set the table.
>> Thanks, Julia. Um, I took a few minutes to review what we spoke about last time, as folks like to say, I'm seldom right now, but we had a reasonable number of decent predictions in in early February.
Um, as I look back at the show notes at the transcript, we talked a lot about downbeat outlook for the bond market. I was negative on bonds. I was positive on energy and this is before the extracurricular activities in the mid east took place. There were good reasons to be positive on bonds on energy and negative on bonds already at that time.
I threw shade at the AI trade. Um we spoke about commodities, gold miners, foreign stocks etc etc and equal weight over um over over market weight. So yeah, the market Julia as you know often has an inability to focus on more than one thing at a time.
Uh whatever is grabbing the headline at that particular moment. Um there was a ter there's a terrific man strategist of Don Cox. Don um was at Harris Associates um Worheim. I think he's retired now. I haven't talked to spoken to him in years. And Don had this great um line. You want to always invest in stories that were on page 16 of the newspaper.
What's that? That's metaphor for focusing on focus on things that are not top of mind for the folks on the front page. Cuz if it's on the front page already, there's a better chance it's already discounted in prices. Instead, you want to find the story in the background. Page 16, he used that as metaphor. And the story on page 16 gradually makes its way to the front page. That's how you make your money.
Sounds rather clever, but and we can't be so pressing to know what's going to happen. But um you look sometimes the front page story keeps going until it doesn't until it doesn't work anymore.
So coming back on bonds, let's start with the bond market. All right. I think it may not be the sexiest thing to talk about, but to me that's really the rising cost of capital globally is the real story here. I mean, we've had this distraction with um this the straits of Hormuz and what's going on in Iran and the gold price. My crystal ball Julia is no better than anybody else's. Um if I had to guess, if I had to speculate, what do we do for a living? We speculate. Um if we speak about the overunder, uh to use a sports term, is this thing going to be settled sooner rather than later or later rather than sooner? I'll take the later rather than sooner. Both sides have dug in. They have positions. uh each has positions the other one's not going to agree to.
Um you know, probably somewhere along the way there'll be some mealymouth compromise. Uh when that's going to happen, I don't know. The Iranians have never had more leverage than they have right now. They have every incentive to just keep doing what they're doing. Um and we'll see. Uh but I don't think there's any easy way out here. and and and and a key point I want to emphasize, I think the margin of safety, the margin of safety is particularly small right now. Um, as you're aware, we've been running down inventories of many commodities, particularly uh uh oil. And so the full economic effect uh the full impact on economic activity of um the of of the shutdown of the straits has really not been felt yet. And we're now coming up to the point where it's going to start to be felt. All you've seen is spot price go up a bit, but again there's a big disconnect between spot and um between uh the physical and financial price of oil. And most notably, and I'm ranting all over the place here, if you look at the deferred contracts, you look at energy say out in December, not spot, but towards say go go go out 6 months. Um those prices are now starting to move up. So the market has for whatever reasons, it's not for me to argue with the market, just to observe what is the market saying and do I do and and and and how does it impact my thinking. We've not seen uh the forward curve move up that much until recently. And that's very important uh cuz the view's been it's rather complacent when the don't worry, this two shall pass. Well, maybe this won't pass as quickly as people think. Uh where a price could go in the short run, I have no idea. 120, 150, 200. And I I've seen I' I heard um I spent a lot of time on this and both mature perspective. I was talking to John Ro the other day, the strate the my favorite technician from 22B. He's predict he says oil could go to 250. Not predicting it but could. And then Michael How I think we've had on your show. Um we're running through some calculations about how high does the price have to go to destroy enough demand to accommodate uh the supply that's available. uh and um uh again it came up with a price similar to 250. So you've got rising oil prices on the back end suggesting that the market starting to believe perhaps that this oil uh situation will not go away very quickly and and and even more more confidently um Darthy, we're not in Kansas anymore.
You're not going back to the pre-February 28th environment. So, you put together rising uh oil prices and who knows how high they're going to go and more importantly how how long they're going to stay elevated with rising cost of capital, rising bond yields. I think in our last uh conversation we spoke about potential Liz trust moment for global bond markets. You have bond yields around the world. Japan 30-year highs, Europe 20-y year highs. The US heels has been relatively well behaved. The 10 years around 450 today I think as we speak or 460 wherever it is. Um, we spoke last time about the possibility of the yields going to 5% or higher. U, you asked me, do I have more conviction in that view now? Yes, I certainly do. Uh, and in a certain point that's going to matter.
Um, some would say, well, it's not the level of rates, but the rate of change in rates that matters. Maybe the market just got the memo finally on Friday of last week. Who knows? But, um, rising oil price, rising bond yield, all things be equal, that's not positive for risk assets. And then you look within the market and Julia, you know, always talk about it's it's it's a market of stocks.
Trying to call the index itself is a fool's errand and I I don't try to do that. But, you know, the leadership, as you know, many of your guests have spoken about has become very narrow. Um, it's been all tech all the time since the end of March. I think that's to me that's unsustainable. It looks like a tremendous blowoff. I know people are saying it's different this time. Looking at things like Micron and SanDisk and but where I come from, you know, buying semis on eight times book history proves it's usually not a very good idea. So, and then you look at the equal weighted S&P, not so much SPY itself. You know, that call I I've been on for a good while when I was on your show last time.
Equal weighted did well until it didn't.
And the last 5 6 weeks since the rally uh off the March lows um it's it's been doing very poorly actually. It's been underperforming S&P and so the broader market is actually not doing particularly well. Consumer stocks making multi-year relative lows, Home Depot, Lowe's, McDonald, Lululemon, just go down the list. So there's a lot to do on both the long side and the short side. And I would just say to you trying to land this plane, I think there's a lot I have a lot more conviction and have a lot more to do on the short side than I do the long side. Long side still like energy, still like the gold miners, um still like resources, broadly speaking. So I think the real trade and and and we put this out in our substack long a bunch of resource stocks, short a bunch of consumer and tech names that spread even with the market rallying has has has produced a 10% return in the last uh six weeks. So, it's a market of stocks. Uh, and I think that's and trying again trying to make the big market call. Don't really know. Um, so there have >> Hey everyone, I hope you are enjoying this interview. If you can take a quick moment and hit that subscribe button. We are on a mission to hit our next goal of 100,000 subscribers and your support could really help us get there. Thank you so much and enjoy the rest of the interview.
Let me ask you this. Um because you're right, you we we you did make this call on bonds with yields going much higher when we last spoke. And my question for you, George, is does this move, especially this move we've seen in the long bond, is this starting to confirm your thesis around the death of financialization, the fiscal bill coming due, the rotation that we out of paper assets into real physical ones. Um yeah, let's talk about what this means the what we're seeing transpire in the bond markets. What is that telling you and what is that reinforcing in terms of like your own investment thesis?
>> Well, that that the course run is unsustainable.
Um I would add has been noted of late with Kevin Worsh being sworn in recently being appointed a new Fed chair. Uh history shows that new Fed chairman also have a way of being tested pretty early on in their term as if there wasn't enough to worry about. The idea that cutting interest rates against the backdrop of surging inflation and exploding deficits.
I don't think the bond market's going to take that very well. I think the bond market vigilantes are in the process of being awakened and uh that's likely to backfire on on on him on them if they do that. Joy, I do recall it wasn't that long. You're old enough to remember when as the saying goes on X. Go back to the fourth quarter last year. It was like, you know, the bidding war. Uh, you know, I got more rate cuts pencil than you do for 2026. Okay. It was like, no, they're going to cut three times, five times.
Okay. What happened to that? Now the water cooler talk is, well, maybe they're going to raise rates. So if they decide to go ahead and cut rates, I think the markets I think their bond market's going to revolve and I think at some point the equity market's going to take note of this. So um the bond the bond call is more conviction on than before cuz it's it's one thing if you have an idea and price doesn't confirm you. Okay, George, you're such a wise guy. You're so smart.
You think this is going to happen, but clearly everybody else thinks the opposite. Well, now we have price in gear with narrative and fundamentals.
And I think it's going to fall to the role of the bond markets to discipline the politicians. I think we spoke with MMT last time about how it's almost enough to make you think that MMT is a thing. Like they've been spending all this money and up until recently, it really hasn't upset the US bond market and um everything's fine. What are you worried about? Okay. Well, you now look, let's take Japan as a canary in the coal mine. you know, where Japan, wherever the world's going, Japan's going to get there first on on the debt side, cuz that's such a debt problem. The yen has continued to weaken. Yeah, it's bounced a little bit the last couple weeks, but in the bigger scheme of things, the yen has been much weaker than virtually anyone anticipated. There's a simple reason for that. Interest rates aren't high enough. Yields aren't high enough.
If they would let rates go up to where they should go in order to stabilize the bond market, um then the yen would appreciate, but they don't. Real rates are too low in Japan. And I think you're going to start to see that in the US as well. People are going to start to get the joke, hey, you know what? Inflation is in in the threes and rising oil. This is part of the oil price surges. No doubt you've seen what's happened to food prices as well. Um, and so he combines rising inflation with a policy response of all these guys to spend more money and you know and and engage in QE.
I mean they're doing stealth easing already at a certain point market's going to say no. And by the way when that happens I know right now gold gold and gold miners aren't flavor of the day but we've been on this kick for I don't know a year and a half or whatever. This is just posit refreshes my conviction in that trade. I think the gold miners are outstanding right now. They're out of favor. So, the talking heads aren't talking about them, but I think this is a great time to be in the gold miners. So, gold miners, energy, regardless what the energy price does, we're going to have to drill for a lot more oil. Drill, baby, drill. And, you know, per growth in the Perian has plateaued. Um, North America has accounted for 80%, I believe, of all the incremental growth in global energy supplies the last decade or more. that's over now. We're going to have to drill more. And uh so I think the service companies look terrific. Uh we've been in the OIH. Um I think land drillers in particular in particular look look very good right now. So um so my so go back to your question my my conviction diminished or increased. It's a very good question Julia because the question I always ask people you have an opinion but how convicted are you? Because you know the opportunity set's never linear.
Sometimes, since you're a basketball fan, sometimes it's going in nothing but net. Give me the ball. I want it. Give it to me in the post. I know what to do with this, right? Other times, you can't even hit the backboard. Air ball. Air ball. Okay, I'm telling you, right, of late, it's been nothing but net in the big picture. Okay, gold miner's not so great lately. But, um, as Peter Lynch should always say, it's not what you first ascertain when you look at a company, look at a stock. It's what you learn the second time, third time, fourth time. You get to know the company better. You get to appreciate the fine points. You can you upgrade the story or downgrade the story. And I would say to you on the macro side of things, definitely upgrading the story. We had the whole moose thing which is solidifying my views of energy is going up. And keep in mind we were positive energy at the start of the year anyway.
And on the fiscal side with the debt to me that just means um the the debasement trade is going to accelerate again because they're going to have to print and bonds aren't going to like it. And I think I think gold and gold miners go higher.
you know, as you point out, um, you mentioned Peter Lynch and, um, I think a lot of folks who are watching know that you are the former assistant of Peter Lynch. You've been in the markets for 45 years and you're just kind of saying like we're getting back to a market of stocks. Back to that Peter Lynch stockpicking environment. Um, would you say that we are in a regime shift that's happening right now as relates to investing? because I imagine a lot of folks are used to what it has been, but it sounds like we're going through a change right now. The 60/40 model doesn't work anymore. It's dead.
>> 100%. Julia, how's the saying go with past performance and there's no guarantee of future results or something like that. Okay. You know, there's a recency bias. Uh I remember when I first started, I was a summer intern at Fidelity in 1980 and we were coming off a decade. This is hard to believe, but Fidelity actually lost money in the 70s.
They had layoffs.
Um, the what saved Fidelity's bacon was this incredible innovation called the money market fund. Okay, they had 8 billion under management. I think it was 3 billion in fixed stock income and 5 billion in equities. Other way around 8 billion. Now it's 18 trillion. Okay. And so my whole career from 81 to say 21 the 40 years was a period of the great uh moderation disinflation um you know rates inflation came down rates came down we can give go through all the reasons globalization productivity boom all this stuff it wasn't the fed it was not the fed that's one thing which you know George Soros likes to talk about the way to really make money in markets is figure out what's not true what is the market that's not true and then more importantly try to ascertain when is the market going to realize it's been had.
And this idea that the Fed's in control, no, they're not in control. They are not in control. You know, humans, we all like to we all like to feel like we're in control. It's comforting. When you feel you're not in control, it's like, oh my god. And so, yeah, the Fed follows the market. All right? You know, they don't lead. Yeah. Okay. Once Yeah, they do stuff once in a while, but I think we'd much be much better off if the Fed never existed. um you know the whole reason we have inflation on and the basement trade is because of the Fed. Uh people say well is what's happening with um the oil price going to be inflationary or not? It doesn't have to be. If the Fed does not print money, if they don't ease, price of oil rises, it depresses everything else. You might get a recession, but you're not going to get you're not going to get inflation.
On the other hand, if they print, which is what they always do, there'll be more money going around. print more money.
What do you think's going to happen to the price of everything? I mean, Julie, I know you know these numbers, but what is it something like 40 or 50% of all the money that we have has been created in the last 5 years?
>> I mean, you you increase the money supply by 50%. What do you think's going to happen to prices? Like, for those of us who've been too bearish, like what did you think was going to happen to financial asset prices? All right. So, this is all the Fed's doing. So, so this this whole idea of of of of macro um you know much of the time macro doesn't matter but there are times when it does matter because policy makers can do certain things to sort of tilt the table a bit and this is one of those times. Uh and as I think we may have spoken about last time and I know you had Jay Pilowski on um after we last spoke.
It's okay you're Duke. He's you you're you Duke. But as Jay likes to say, and I don't know if he said it on your show, you know, his superpower is to ignore Donald Trump. Not because he likes Trump or hates Trump, but it's just Trump is a volatility uh generator and you know there's what he says one day isn't necessarily the same he's going to say the next day. So stay focused on the big picture, know what you own, stay focused on the fundamentals. You know, a lot of these resource plays, the miners, um the the take SSRM, okay, it's a stock I'm public on. I recommend a Substack Julia.
It's a gold miner. All right. The thing is on seven times earnings. Seven times earnings. Like 75% margins. Um they're buying back stock. They sold they they they sold their biggest asset this their big Turkish asset a few months ago for a billion half dollars.
The stock buyback I don't have the numbers to to to hand, but the stock buyback is it's like it's like 10 20% of the float. It's insane. I can show you minor after minor which is incredibly cheap and that that's just based on current m gold prices. Um god forbid the price of gold goes up which I for expect it will these stocks could double triple without any problem at all but the market's not believing it. The market's not believing these are not also talking about the market of stocks these stocks they're not in the index or go back to energy energy is what they three and a half four% of the index is like 8% of the index. So if you're running real money, you know, if you're Will Danoff who runs a contrad, my good friend at Fidelity, Will hasn't told me anything, you're running big money, it's more important for you to get the Apple verse Nvidia call correct than it is how much you have in energy. So I think so going back, this is going to come back to your question about stock picking as well. I think this is this is the golden age stock picking. Whereas the prior few years, the Mag 7 killed it and rightfully so. Their revenues and profits went through the roof way growing much more rapidly than the broader market and it's still happening.
But now I'll get to another one of the calls. You know, last I'm suspicious of the AI trade that looked great for a few more weeks until it wasn't. But I think one of those points where rubber bands been stretched. Um, now this rolls into, and I know you've you've had um Chris Whan on talking a lot about private equity, private credit. This is where, um, this is very relevant to the AI trade. A lot of the stuff's being financed, the marginal financing agent for a lot of these things has been private credit. And whereas credit spreads, broadly speaking, in the economy are okay, which is a reason why right now we're not looking at a at a recession. But again there there are good reasons to there's evidence for either case most recently real starting to come down etc etc but on the bull side of the ledger for the economy is that credit spreads are well behaved.
However, you look at private credit, you look at Oracle, you look at CDS or disaster and everyone's saying, "Oh my god, look at the quarter. Look at the revenues, you know, that Nvidia prints."
Nvidia is going to have numbers this Wednesday. For all I know, they'll probably be good, but that's not what's so interesting. What's interesting, what stock going to do? People look at Micron. They look at the hyperscalers, but and I know you've you've spoken about this, the balance sheets, the the free cash flow of these companies is being thrown out the window because of the hundreds of billions soon to be trillions of dollars being spent on AI.
And I don't see any credible monetization path in store. And so I think perhaps as we spoke last time, I think this continues to be perhaps the biggest misallocation of uh capital in the history of the world. Right now, the market doesn't care about it broadly speaking. They certainly care about it if you're a if you're an Oracle investor. And you know, the MAG 7's done well the last few weeks, but prior to that, it did poorly for 5 6 months. It made up that underperformance in a relatively short period of time. And I think we're soon going back to that. So again, it's a market of stocks. Stay away from bonds. Stay away from tech.
I know semis are doing great, but I think the the bubble is not in the valuations. The bubble is in the margins of those companies. It's cickle industry software a real minefield. Uh you really got to differentiate between the halves and the have nots. And the flip side of it, you know, uh energy, gold, commodities, foreign stocks equal weight over um over uh market cap weight. And just on the short side, there's a lot to do. A lot to do particularly in the consumer area.
Do you think we're in a stock market bubble?
>> Um, it's funny. Words have meaning. Um, let me answer the question this way. I think there are many many stocks that are in a bubble.
There also many stocks have been sleeping and rightfully so. So for instance, if you take the consumer, you take the the retail ETF and don't use XRT because that's a crazy ETF, but you look at the equal weight retail, the thing is going nowhere. You look at the housing stocks, they're going nowhere. You look at anything related to the consumer, just 70% of the economy, they're going nowhere. Now the stock market's not the economy. The economy is not the stock market. The market is being propelled by a very small group of stocks.
I believe the earnings of Nvidia are in a bubble.
People say, "Well, the PE is not high."
Yeah, I know the PE is not high, but look at where the margins are relative to the past. PES are really can be misleading. If you think about it, it's really shorthand for discounted cash flow. And so, the problem with Nvidia is not what are they making last quarter, this quarter, it's where it's how sustainable are these earnings and these margins, what they'll be making three or four years from now. And you know it's easy and the the tech bro do do not want to acknowledge this but let me give you an example. I may have spoken about this with you earlier on another occasion.
Look at the shipping stocks. Okay the shipping stocks it's pretty simple business model. You have a vessel.
You borrowed some money to buy the vessel. You got interest expense. You got depreciation. You got to pay your crew. You got fuel. The costs are kind of fixed. They don't really move around very much. They go up a little bit with inflation but not so much. So, let's say it's costing you 15 $20,000 a day to run a ship. And let's say you're taking in 2530,000. So, you're making $10,000 profit. I'll keep it simple. $15,000 cost, $25,000 profit. You're making$10,000. And then there's a shortage. Let's say the straight moves get closed and all of a sudden the the vessels have to be rerouted. So, the t miles go way up. So, there's not enough vessels to go around. So the rate goes from 25,000 to 75,000.
Your cost is still 15. So what happens?
Your profit went from 10 to 60. Huge operating leverage. All right. So the bubble in that case. And people say, well, you know, it's only a four times earnings. You'd be like, yeah, but that's earnings like right now. These are not that's not normal. Just wait till the market normalizes and the earnings are going to go back to $25,000 a day, not $75,000 a day. So if you said to me, Julia, are the shipping stocks in that scenario in a bubble? Yeah, the prices are very high. But the real problem there, it's not the PE, it's the earnings. And I would humbly submit for your consideration that's what we're dealing with tech stocks right now.
>> Okay. And also just to point out as well, like we talk about we talk about the markets, we also talk about the economy. I heard you say earlier like you don't see a recession ahead, right?
But we've also seen the headlines around consumer sentiment hitting all-time lows. Stock markets continuing to touch new highs.
>> Let me contextualize my comment here. My call to be the things I like, things I don't like. You don't have to believe in a recession to have the positions I have. All right.
I think the consumer stocks have been underperforming. I think they continue to underperform whether we technically get a definition to get a defined um uh recession or not. All right. There's a good reason to be bearish on tech, bearish on bonds, positive energy, positive on resources with or we had a recession. Now, if we get a real big recession, then you got to call the question, what's going to happen to commodity prices? That's another story.
But if you say to me, are we in a recession? We might possibly be in one.
I mean, I think the consumer the consumer is in a recession. You're even starting to see uh reports of the high-end consumer cracking. Um I do know that uh you know still a lot of excesses the high end depends where you go. Some things are prices holding really well but some not so much. So you have um you're starting to see the signs of the consumer really weakening and this may be the month just because the full impact of the higher oil prices. I'm sure if you went to fill up your car lately, Julie, you noticed the costing a little bit more to fill up your tank than it was previously. Food prices are accelerating again. So real incomes are coming under pressure. So, are we in a recession right now? Possibly. But that's not really the that's not the way I roll. I'm trying to figure out how do we make money. I'd rather I'd rather make money and be wrong on the economic call than the other way around. So, um I would say the consumer isn't the consumer or large swaths of the consumer are in recession right now.
>> Mhm. Um we were talking about energy prices rising. Do you see more inflation ahead or is that not energydriven inflation? Can you just make the distinction?
>> Yeah. Well, you're seeing, you know, as some have pointed out, um, the whole kamay thing, it started out with gold.
That's moved to energy, food, depending what you're looking at, starting to really pick up like meat prices, um, you know, all go buy some seafood, see what that costs, you know.
>> Oh, yeah.
>> I mean, it's like hope. So, it's it's starting to permeate. And then you look in the sector in the in the service sector inflation is kind of sticky.
So the idea you know service sector inflation has low threes in short rates wherever they are 4% in the 10 years at 450 460 doesn't sound particularly uh restrictive to me to the contrary I think money still money mop is still very easy.
So, which by the way, which by the way, also I was just thinking about this before coming on the show. The fact that rates have gone up, but seemingly there's no recession right now.
Just rates means rates could continue to go up before the Feds call this action.
Do like why would Julio think back for a second? Stock markets other than markets plunging on Friday. Okay, plunging. I love it. I get this these hyperbolic headlines. Other than the one day plunge, markets are basically at all-time highs.
Commodity prices are surging.
Unemployment rates kind of okay.
Credit spreads are very tight. Like why would you ease?
>> Now if you worship at the alt of the stock market and you're Donald J. Trump and you can't allow the market or Scott Bessie, you can't have the by the way not a political statement. If we're outlawing bare markets and outlawing recessions, okay, I get why you're going to ease. But they try that at a certain point. And I think we're here already.
The market's going to say no mas and the question you didn't ask, but I'll anticipate is okay, rates have been going up, but why does that now matter?
And again, it may have to do with the with the with the speed of rate increases, not just not just the fact they're going up. But Julia, think about it for a second. You know, imagine um I don't know, let's say the temperature is 50° and it goes up by 10° to 60 and 10° to 70, another 10° to 80. It's not bothering you. Then we go to 90 getting a little bit warm. Now at 100, it's like, oo, wait a second. Wait a second. Okay. And that's kind of like the anal or use the water in the bathtub analogy. Same idea. All right. The rates won't matter until they matter. And I think another one another one another one another one another one another one another one another one another one another one another way which it really does matter and another big I mentioned there's a lot to the short side it's not just consumer stocks these rising interest rates with the meme stocks I think we talked about Oklahoma last time there are so many high flyers it's pure momentum pure speculation pure short squeeze you know corowe you know is is is a $30 is is a bankruptcy in my opinion masquerading as $105 stock fresh which I think we talked about previously which Tom Chains nailed at our last conference. Stock went from 80 to 49. I think it's going it's going to 10. I mean I can show you stock after stock after stock which is a disaster. Has nothing to do with what the index is doing. Meanwhile, I think accidental petroleum will do just fine. Thank you very much. So what it means for the index and whether I'm going to call in a bare market and whether we're in recession, whether we're in a bubble, to me that's not as helpful as trying to figure out, okay, explicitly how do we make money? What do we go long? What do we go short? Mhm.
Yeah. Um well, we have Kevin Walsh coming in at the Fed. Any expectations from him? Like, um does that I mean, yeah. What are your expectations from him?
>> Julia, would you want to be him? I wouldn't want to be him.
>> No.
>> Julie, could you please explain to our viewers what does it mean when you're stuck between a rock and a hard place?
>> Yeah.
>> Hope that answers your question.
Yeah.
>> Um, >> I mean, listen, listen listen. He's a good guy. Um, I know of him. I don't know him, but it's a thankless position that he's in right now. I mean, under a lot of pressure, I'm sure, from the man in the White House, but on the other side, he's got to deal with the markets and um, as I said earlier, not a lot of margin for safety, a lot of not a lot of room to maneuver. So, >> when you say not a lot of margin to safety, I know the book Seth Carmen and what do you mean? Like what do you mean when you say that?
>> Okay, so Seth, who I know pretty well from my Boston days, uh he is the smartest guy in the room. One of the brightest investors I've ever met. Think of it this way, Julia. Let's say you and I are walking across a mountain ridge.
There's only 10 ft of path on either side of us and it's nice sunshiny day and it's beautiful. No problem. We can just kind of like go across the bridge, no problem.
But let's say the weather turns for the worse and the wind picks up and I don't know you're up top of Mount Washington or someplace in New Hampshire where there's known to be pretty bad weather and you're in this narrow little trail.
You weigh less than I do. I'm willing to ask you that guess. But the chance that you get could get into trouble pretty high.
Mount Washington's been I think to have the highest recorded winds anywhere in the history of the world over 200 miles an hour something like that right so if valuations are low and the economyy's on solid footing and profit margins have a way to go up okay stuff can happen but you're kind of your your downside's underwritten by the fact that stocks weren't expensive to begin with maybe there's the outlook once This two shall pass once the recession gets out of the way. All good.
On the other hand, when you have highly valued stocks that are over earning and you have very little scope, actually it's a very good question you ask. You always have a way of asking these annoyingly good questions. You just triggered me. That's your job. Um, kudos to you.
the capacity to engage in further fiscal easing. In other words, more spend more money.
They're talking about trying to get defense spending up a trillion and a half this year or whatever. But ease further, ease, you know, spend more.
Louisie Gob said recently um that the policy tools available in a disinflationary environment are much different in than an inflationary environment. And that's one of the reasons why buying the dip has become so ingrained amongst investors.
When you're worried about recession, when you're worried about deflation, as was the case prior to COVID, for many years post GFC because our fiscal situation was relatively better and because inflation was low and falling, there was tremendous scope to uh increase spending and cutting interest rates. They were just following what was happening to inflation. Now it's the opposite. We're at one of those points where the bond markets are starting to cry uncle. You can't really spend more and cutting interest rates in environment of rising inflation. So I think there's a category error being made by uh investors now. In other words, we're in a totally different setup. And so this whole buy the dip mentality is is is a byproduct of the fact the authorities always came to the rescue. And I think their ability to come to the rescue right now is being severely curtailed. That's on the macro side. So going back to your question about margin of safety, there's not a lot of room for for monetary and fiscal maneuver right now.
>> So also you and I have talked about the death of speculation, but also what I'm also hearing from you is you're still very much invested in the markets, but it's getting back to that stock pickers market, a market of stocks, picking your spots where you want to be or how you want to be allocated.
100%. And by the way, very good, very very good point. I'd like to drill down just a little bit further. ETFs also are not the answer >> because you have what are known as dirty ETFs or it's like you know the commercials like you know do you know what's in your ETF? Like you know what's the one capital know what's in your wallet? Do you know what's in your ETF?
Okay. So when someone goes all the other ones >> okay so when someone says oh the consumer ETF okay you want to buy the retail XRT. It's kind of a screwed up ETF but I digress. You then look at X was it XL uh Y. That's the consumer one, I believe. Okay. That thing is like 20% I haven't looked at a few months. That thing is like 20% Amazon, 20% Tesla.
So, the consumer ETF is 40% MAG 7. So, everyone's like, "Oh, I'm buying consumer stocks." Well, okay, you had the right idea, but did you realize you bought you bought the wrong instrument?
So, everyone wants to like, "Oh, it's no problem. I got my ETFs. I'm good. I don't have to pick stocks." you know, why would you possibly give money to an active manager? They always underperform. Their fees are higher than passive. Blah blah blah blah blah. This is classic.
>> This is classic. You know, Julie, I know you know this, but they've done studies in the past on um what happens to managers that get fired by like the pension funds. All right? And usually the pension funds, they allocate the money, they fire the manager at exactly the wrong time. So like Julia gets fired by Kalpers and you know and George gets fired by Texas teachers and they did a study of all this and over like the next 12 24 months the fire managers absolutely kill it. Okay cuz the investors give up at exactly the wrong time. All right. I'm telling you the public is doing that now with active managers. They're getting killed by ETFs. Yeah. I for good reason. Active managers sucked. The tax consequences are adverse, you know. So you have the index funds. Mike Green, please call your office. You got the ETFs. This is absolutely perfect for active managers.
As a matter of fact, active managers based on the last day at ISaw are killing it now. You know, I think the easiest way to outperform the market, I mean, it was so hard to outpour the market for a number of years cuz if you didn't know Mag 7, you were dead. I think the opposite's now going to apply.
And so, I think we are in the golden age of of stock picking. Yes.
>> And how about having the stomach to short?
I mean because I know it's been a rough going for short sellers in recent years.
Imagine sounds like that started to change. But um yeah, what about the stomach to short?
>> You know, some of my smarter friends, Seth Kleman, as a matter of fact, when says it's not a good idea. Seth Carmen says shorting is a bad business. And it is a bad business. All right? And the reason it's a bad business, not just cuz stocks go up over time is another problem people don't fully recognize.
It's why you find a great company, Lar Ro Technology, and you buy it. It's got good prospects, the valuation looks reasonable, and you own it, and it goes up and they have good earnings. They announce new products, and maybe it is.
I don't want to say it's a one decision stock, but you know, that can compound for years. That can compound for years.
So, you just keep updating your models and listen to the quarterly calls and talk to management. You're good. problem with the short. So say you want to go short Noble Technology because they have aggressive management, scammy accounting, rumors are going to blow the quarter. The problem with shorting Noble Technology, unless it's a fraud, I've been called worse, by the way, unless it's a fraud. Um, you'll make money on the bad quarter. You make your 20 30% or whatever, but they have the incentive to try to fix it. And so there's no compounding effect for being short. Now, every once in a while you get an absolute zero like Enron, okay? Like, by the way, I think some of the Mac 7 stocks are going to be some of the AI related stuff. I think some of these Neoclouds, someone described Coreweave as Weiworks or GPUs, you know, they have long they own these they have these long-term commitments. They they own these chips, but but they can't the price they're going to be able to rent them out. It's going to is going to collapse. Same thing happened to Wiiworks. So, shorting is a bad business.
Um, I don't recommend it for most people. I've probably lost as much money as I've made. Yeah, it sounds cool. You turn heads because most people don't do it. But there is information content in what shorts do. And what I would say is you should just avoid those stocks. So if you think Fresh Pets a pile of of uh doodoo or you think Okalo's garbage or Cor is garbage or Tesla's garbage, just avoid them. Don't short them. Just avoid them. And and in fact, there are a couple of products out there. These actually been very good investments. A couple of the boutique firms on the street, they have what are known as their failure models or their or their um their their undermulas. And if you just and Jim Chanos has done this actually, if you go along the market and short the garbage, there's like alpha 10 12% a year. If you can pick out the losers and so you try to capture that. But just going short outright, bad business. Mhm. All right, George, before I let you go here, you have a conference this week on the 20th, the Best Income Ideas Conference. Um, as we wrap, let folks know more about what you guys what you're doing with this event, why they might want to attend.
It's on Wednesday, uh, May 20th. So, the floor is all yours.
>> Thanks, Julia. I'll be brief. Um, so we had a conference on March 11th, stock pickers summit. We had uh 800 people attending that conference. It was a huge success.
This one's going to be a little bit different. We're going to have another stock picking one in a couple months.
This one's going to be for income investors. As we were talking earlier, uh the 604 6040 portfolio is dead along with the 6040 portfolio. So, if you're cautious on bonds as I am, what are you supposed to do with that 40% of your portfolio that's intended to generate income, especially if you're an older age, you know, if you're 25, 35, you got all the time in the world to make it up.
Forget about bonds, but as the saying goes, Julia, and I don't recall who made up this saying, but you know, bonds representing certificates of confiscation. Um, you know, it's it's sort of when when you when you stop and think about if you make 4 and a half% on a 10 year after taxes, after inflation, you're guaranteed to lose money in real terms.
So, what are you supposed to do with that? That's what this conference is designed to do. We have a roster of uh 13 speakers, some of the best names in the business that you would know. Luke Groman, Michael How, David Haye, Jay Pilowski, John Rog in combination with in collaboration with Seeking Alpha.
Steve Crest is uh their lead um analyst.
He has a fantastic product, Alpha Pix, which is up 400% in the last uh 5 years, four or five years. It's transparent, repeatable, scalable. It's killed 99% of of of managers. trouncy indices S&P's up I think 93% in that period of time he's up 400%. So he's he's going to talk about some income oriented ideas. And by the way, these can be stocks with a high yield. It could be a bond. It could be a strategy. It could be a fund. But just how do you generate income? So as example, you might want to own an MLP, a pipeline, or you might want to own a Brazilian bond. You know, Jay Plowski, I'm sure, will talk about Brazil, and he I think he spoke about it on your show recently. you know, would you rather own bonds in the US where you have a very der fiscal situation and the and the currency is depreciating or you look at Brazil where yields are 14%, real rates are 10% and the currency is going up and the and the and and and the currency is very undervalued. So there you have a high yield with scope for rates to go down and an appreciating currency. So it could be stock, it could be a bond. uh David Haye who has a fantastic he's evergreen gavcow fantastic investor particularly in fixed income he's going to be speaking and then we have I think seven or eight folks from seeking alpha each of them have their own publications um we had one fellow on um Leo Nellison yesterday on on my on my Twitter space and it was absolutely phenomenal so I'll stop but if you think the next decade next few years let's say are not going to look like the last few years where you can't own bonds, what are you supposed to do? This conference is designed to help come up with ways to generate income without being beholdened to the US Treasury market.
>> That sounds like a wonderful event. We will link it in the show notes for anyone who would like to attend. George Noble, CIO of Noble Capital Advisors, thank you so much for being so genius with your time, all of your knowledge, your wisdom, for being a friend of the show. We love having you on and wish you a very successful conference and look forward to our next conversation. Thanks again, George.
>> Thank you, Julie. Always a pleasure.
Related Videos
Truckers Finally Seeing Higher Rates… But Carriers Are STILL Going Bankrupt
LetsTruckTribe
480 views•2026-05-28
IS THIS THE REAL REASON FOR DATA CENTERS?
PrepperDawg
7K views•2026-05-31
JPMorgan CEO JUST NUKED Mamdani... as NYC's Middle Class COLLAPSES
Englishman-In-NewYork
7K views•2026-05-30
The Dark Age Of Blue Collar Has Begun
derekpolasekofficial
4K views•2026-05-28
What has a broader economic impact, corporate downsizing or ecological collapse?
theratracejournal
1K views•2026-05-29
China Is Quietly Buying Gold, the Iran Deal Is Frozen, and Silver Is Heating Up
RichardHolloway0
694 views•2026-05-31
Why Canadians can no longer afford to survive #canada #inflation #shorts
TrueNorthInvestor-v4j
131 views•2026-06-01
Why People Pay More For Someone They Trust
financian_
66K views•2026-05-28











