When evaluating leveraged and income-focused ETFs, investors must balance higher yields against Net Asset Value (NAV) performance and stability. Higher yields often come from selling options (covered calls) which can limit upside potential and increase volatility. Funds with higher stable deck ratings (indicating lower volatility) typically sacrifice some yield for more consistent returns. The optimal choice depends on an investor's risk tolerance, income needs, and market outlook, as demonstrated by comparing funds like TQQY (16% yield, 48 stability) versus Triple QI (34% yield, 64 stability) versus QYLD (12% yield, 94 stability).
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
THE SUNDAY NIGHT FACTORAdded:
Hey guys, happy Sunday. Hope everyone's doing great. Jackson, you're doing Hey, Jackson, guess what? Jackson was a good boy today. Or was it yesterday? It was yesterday.
And he uh and he had a bathtub. He had a bathtub and he was super well behaved.
So, I told him he could have a treat tonight. Come here, Jackson.
All right. There you go. But he is he's super clean. He smells good. He's happier.
Yeah, we had we had bathtubby day yesterday. Not really. It wasn't a bathtubby because it was outside and it was a garden hose. It was more like a drive by car wash. But anyway, he did good. He's not real thrilled about the hose and about, you know, taking a bath. He, you know, but anyway, he does a good job. Look at this darn uh S&P 500 futures. Looks like they're trading at all-time highs.
Um NASDAQ, I mean, it looks like they're, you can see they're off a little bit.
They're pulling back just a teeny bit from all-time highs. Uh Russell, Russell still has a little ways to go to be at all-time highs.
Um Bitcoin is down, but only four 100s of a point in the broader steam of things. Bitcoin looks to me like it just like it was got too got too far ahead of itself in this latest trading range it's in and just popped back and checked um checked the mean a couple of times and then even just a few days ago it got up here and got ahead of itself where there isn't a lot of two-way action and shot back down to check you know check the previous pock basically it's basically at pock um let's see what gold's Gold is down a little bit, down about two/ird of a point. Gold also seems to kind of got ahead of itself on this shortterm time frame. It's only a 30 minute time frame. I mean that very but but so the past what uh two weeks it's been just kind of grinding in this range centered around 4500 and got below it a few times it was too low. came back and checked it. Got above it a few times. It was too high. Let's check silver.
Silver kind of the same thing is bouncing around this trading range at uh 7634.
So, all right guys. Well, I have a good show planned tonight. We have aliens here and we have Michael Seattle.
Michael here. All right. Man, I've been all I've been doing is working. So, I'll show you. Let's do the show first and then I'll show you what I've been working on.
Um, all right. Well, and I don't even know where the S&P went to.
Whatever. We'll just do the NASDAQ tonight because I so we can talk about other stuff. All right. So, it's S&P Sunday night. So, we're going to do the factor. So, let's meet our contestants.
I usually start by the highest yield.
Usually that picks the worst, you know, so kind of we save the best to let best for last. Anyway, uh TQQY from Granite Shares down 6% on NAV. How are you down on NAV when uh when the market's up so much, but the answer lies partly in the yield.
It yields 16 points higher than the next closest.
Okay. So that's so it gets an extra 16 points of yield, but the one that's next closest to it has an extra 11 points of NAV because instead of being down six, it's up five and a half. Really 12 points of nav when you add in the the fractions. So that's where that extra yield is going to. It's coming out of the nav. Anyway, um but uh anyway, QDT is down. Um, stable deck is a 48. So that's not super stable. It's it's leverage. They're selling leverage options. Did you guys see old Matthew Tuttle made a comment on Twitter about selling options on le on TQQQ? Anyway, go to Twitter and check it out. Anyway, QDT, this one's always done a nice job. Performs really well. Um, stable X is a 58. Not super stable either, but more stable than uh TWQI.
Okay, then triple Qi. Now, this one has been a darling lately, yielding 34% at the NAVS plus nine. So, just think about that. Triple Qi yields 24% less than TQQI, but it's doing uh 6 + 19. What is that? 15.
It's doing 15 points better on NAV. And it's NAV's actually positive. So that 34% is a real yield where the 58% isn't.
Anyway, good job Triple Qi QLDY. This does lightning spreads. This is impressive. The yield's about the same as Triple Qy. Triple Qy is a target 30 fund and I would expect it eventually to to be around 30. QLDY is unconstrained and has been paid in the low30s. It does a good job catching upside. QLDY is plus 9.71 uh for the quarter.
Nav only uh QLDY not super safe because of all the extra upside they because of the the options the way they do the options um on this one adds a little bit of danger. We'll see some ones where they actually add a little bit of safety. Um Y triple Q this is inverse so we'd expect it to be down when the market's up. I mean you know you'll need 30%.
Fairly safe. Safe doesn't make a judgment on if it's making money or not.
Safe is just looking at how much it moves around. So, really, as far as how much it moves around, this one moves around less than any of the other ones that we've been looking at. Either direction, up, down, doesn't matter. All right. Uh, Triple QT. Now, look at this thing. This thing from Defiance is up 12%. Now, check this out. Triple Qy is a 30% target fund. Um, so they sell enough options to make 30%. All right. Well, the then this quarter with that leaves them with about nine points of NAV left over. I mean, but Triple QT only has to sell enough options to make 20%. So, Triple QT presumably has to sell about uh 50% less options from 30 to 30 to 20 or 33% less option. Anyway, yeah, they have to sell a third less option. So that third less options means they have some uncapped upside. Now the market still has to go up but it certainly has gone up and triple QT is plus 12. TAC does a good job. Their strategy is they sell options during the day but they cover it and they're uncovered at night.
So if the market runs at nighttime they they may they have uncapped NAV gains and that you can really see that one's been doing well. Also that's their plan.
And Triple QT's plan is they use call spreads and they only sell the call spreads on about a fourth or a third of the portfolio. The rest of the portfolio is open to run. Triple Qi overwrites the whole portfolio, but they use call spreads too. But in any event, now Triple Qi, the way these guys do options, these guys uh do it in more of a safe manner, and we can see it in the stable deck. stable X is a 64 yields a little bit less and the NAV's a little bit less but the NAV's still doing you know better than QDTY um better than QDTE and those aren't bad funds at all. I mean but anyway not doing as well as Triple Qi this time. Um now to be fair though QDT pays a 42% yield where Triple Qi just pays 13. So, you kind of you kind of get what you pay for, right? All right. Uh, Kle Q's 20 up 20% on NAV, 13% yield. EDGQ up 12 and a quarter on NAV with an 11.7% yield. It should be said that uh Kleq is the most volatile out of all the ones we've looked at so far. It's only a 38 on the stable deck, so they're probably taking more chances with their underlines. However, and they are they're the most volatile one we've looked at. However, they're also the one that's NAV is up the most. So, they're probably stepping out on the risk curve a little bit, but it's working out this time. Um, to be sure, let's just do it like that. All right. So, uh, EDGQ, this one's a 59 on safety or stability.
Anyway, EDGQ does a good job. It's plus 12%. That's pretty dang good. 11% yield.
Qyld. This one usually pays around 12.
Lately, it's 11 and a half. But look at this. It's only up one and a it's only up less than 2% because they sell at the money options on the whole portfolio.
So, they just basically forgo basically all the upside. But in return for that, that creates a big downside buffer.
It cut off more. They cut off more right tail, meaning they cut off up moves, but they take in an income to cut off up moves. So, the big income cushions down moves also. It's not a hedged equity, but it's it it does have a hedging effect. Anyway, out of all the ones we've looked at, this is the safest one. And you know, because it mainly I would say because the downside cushion.
Well, and also it's safe. It's not like safe in sense of losing money. It's it's actually dangerous as far as making you lose your money. I mean, it has been lately, but it's safe in the sense of moving around and it's just because of the way the options are structured. Um, but anyway, Qyld and Triple Qi, you know, are some of the safer ones we've looked at tonight. All right. Um, yeah, Qyld, that's from Global X. Then we have FTQI. This is an old one from first. Well, I don't know how old it is.
Anyway, it's based on the NASDAQ. It's a 70 on stability. That's not too bad.
Chef Q's a 74 on stability. That's That's not too bad. They're paying about 11 12% on FTQI and CHP Q or I'm sorry 11 and 10% on those two. NAV's up five and three, which is all right, but not great compared to some of these other ones. We have double QA, the income advantage fund from Invesco. Jackson, where you chilling on, buddy? You good? Okay. Um, anyway, that one's paid about a 9% yield. It's a 68 on stability. That's pretty That's a pretty good staple.
68's not too bad. GPIQ is a 62.
It's all right. That one's up 12% on NAV. Good job, GPIQ.
Um, they only use monthly options.
That's how they get a little bit more stability. They only use monthly options and I believe they leave some of the portfolio uncovered so they get a little extra upside. And you can see 12, you know, they're double digits for a lot of these are single digits. Uh, triple Q.
This is a hedged equity situation.
They're selling off upside to buy downside protection. So sure enough, they only got 4% nearly 5% upside. And you also don't get much yield because you're spending part of the yield that you otherwise would get on a regular covered call to buy puts. So you get a little bit less yield, but anyway, that one could work. Oh, but you get a lot of safety. That one's an 85 on stability.
That one is actually the safest one yet.
That one's even a little bit safer than Qyld.
And then we have Triple QX. This one is uh what is this one doing? It's up 10% on NAV from New. They call it a dynamic overwrite.
Um and it pays about 7.4%.
It looks like they might take some extra risk because it's only a 44 on the stable decks. And I think what these guys do is they don't override a whole lot of options. They leave it open for a lot of upside. That's what dynamic overwrite means. It means they don't always write 100%. Based on the conditions of the market, they can write less or they can go out further.
And you could just kind of tell by looking that these guys get double digit on NAV, but they get some of the lowest yield. So they're that's that's what they're doing. You could just kind of tell and and when you do a strategy like that, it it helps you on a in a bullish market. That's what they've been doing well. But it adds a little bit to the movement to the running around part of it. Um, and anyway, then we have TYG.
Now, they sell options on half the portfolio. So, uh, and they make about 5%. They do all right on NAV. They're up 9% on NAV. Okay. So, let's look at stable decks. Okay. The stable ones were Triple Q and QYLD. In fact, those were the only ones that are more stable than the market. JIP Q is pretty close, 94%.
You know, the market's 100. So JIP Q's pretty much market stability. Qyld and triple QH are market stability and then some. And all the other ones are unstable. And the ones that are the least stable are K triple Q. And I mean because the nav's up the most. I mean that's kind of all right with me. I mean you'd kind of expect this one to be less stable. And this this triple QX from News to be like they're only overwriting a small part of the portfolio. Now, in any event, so those are the ones that are a little bit less stable. So, let's just run this by uh All right, let's run it by Max Factor.
Our winner is K triple Q tonight. Look at that. I mean, how can you make anyone else the winner? I mean, even if they only paid 7% yield, they they would have been the winner. But when they pay 13, they pay some of the, you know, pretty pretty good amount of yield. I mean, well, we could just look uh well, for whatever reason, they don't have the the yield percentile on here, but uh it's fine. Um I mean, there they have yield profit margin all day. 618% yield profit margin, and they have the highest average return, and it's not like they have low yield. If they have really low yield, like 5% or something, they might not be number one. But when they have yield that's easily mid pack, you know, they're going to slide on up here. Anyway, EDGQ does a great job.
Also, it's plus 12%. TAX plus 12%.
It almost looks like they the max factor just picks on NAV return. A NAV return momentum is a big part of it, but it also demands uh stability and yield.
um you know, you can see I mean I mean it looks at everything and then it also looks at uh at the yield profit margin and make sure that they aren't like on purpose paying too much. Um but anyway, those are good ones. TAC and then triple QT fourth GPIQ. I mean any of those could work.
You know, just pick your yield. I mean, you know, GPIQ kind of has a little bit lower yield. was probably one of the it's probably the main reason it was fifth instead of third or something because yield's part of it. We want the highest yield possible but without without you know if we can still have uh flat you know good nav and have our have our yield paid for and stuff. Qilg triple Qi look pretty good. Y triple Q should be at the bottom because it's inverse and TQQY these granite uh funds are just kind of a different a different creature you know and this QYLD really did do really good either really well I should say although to be fair QYLD will do better in a in a pullback you know QYLD was one of the safer ones on the on the stable decks QYLD was the second most stable one triple QH was the first most stable or well that's the stable percentile and this is the stable decks anyway you guys all right what else you guys want to talk about so look what I'm look what I've been making all day I've been making uh yield hounds so like you can come in here and you could say all right uh I'm looking for one that I'm looking for some foreign stock exposure some active diversified foreign stock opposed to Oh, that's too many. All right. And let's say I want some real dividends. Okay. Form stock, real dividends, active diversified, meaning they could switch stocks, switch stocks in and out of the portfolio, kind of in the way that a blocks is active diversified. ULTI, what you know, these ones that that have a portfolio and change it, you know, once a month, once a quarter, you know, uh, so they aren't just a static portfolio, not a passive, it's active. So anyway, your choices are NDIV, SR T, SD, and IDBO. I wonder if we didn't really care about foreign stock, but we want, let's say, we want just real stock. We just want to look at stock dividends, oil that deal with energy and oil and gas. All right. Well, we have NDIV, MPLX, MLPI. Okay. Well, wonder if we wanted to look at uh you know, just I don't know what we we can look at all the hedged equity ones.
We could look at the hedged equity NASDAQ. Well, the hedged equity S&P 500 ones. Anyway, I've been working on this all day um on Yield Hound, but it's just these are the same these are the same ETFs that are on the factor. So, this is going to be part of the uh subscription service. Uh yeah, Michael, hey, what's up, man? Uh blocks.
Yeah, well, let's let's do some battle royale.
Um or you I mean, we we could look at we can also look at blocks. Uh well, we can also look at blocks this way.
Yeah, lots is 69th.
Let's go look at I mean 69th is top 15%.
That's no slouch especially when you consider you know it's blocks parents moving average is underneath the 200 day moving average. I mean it's not making excuses for it but but its parent is in a downtrend whereas like XLKI's parent is tech is XLK major uptrend you know I mean so that that does make a difference but anyway uh but so 69th that's like top 40 is the top 10% so that's like the top 17% or something so anyway but let's just see what it does and who's around it okay blocks trading around 1775 5 at least it was the other day. Yield is around 38 and a quarter, a little bit more actually. Yield profit or no, I'm sorry. The quarterly NAV return is 16%.
That's insane. I can't believe it's not higher. I mean, it's only at 25 on the stable deck. So, it's it's four times crazier than the S&P 500 there. It's it's crazy it is to think there's a lot of ETFs up here that also yield in the 30% that's NNAV is up this much or more that are that are twice as safe. Um you know but anyway but but 69th I mean it is I mean that's it's not bad. I mean, I'd take that any day of the week because I mean, for one thing, yield profit margin um is 172%.
You know, anything over 100 is good.
Hell, STK Columbia Thread Needles yield profit margin is 3,000%.
I don't know what the heck that one's doing. Jesus. Now, we're going to have to look at it. STK.
It looks like the NAV is up 30% on this quarter. Do they have oil and gas? They must. Or do they have microchips?
They're paying nine and a quarter premium technology growth. Okay. They have microchips.
You know, they probably have some micron and some maybe some private companies that are in the same business.
Yeah, these guys are just uh are just killing it. I don't see a holdings.
Let's see. Performance port portfolio.
Let's see right here. Okay. Blue Energy, Lamb Research, Marll Technology, Broadcom, Invidia, Alphabet, Western Digital. Oh my gosh. Yeah, these guys are killing it. They are absolutely killing it. Um anyway, I know we came here to look at blocks, but you know, look at Columbia Thread Needle. I mean, it only pays 4.87, you know, but it nav is absolutely killing it. So, of course, has good yield profit margin, but it it's pretty low on yield. So, you know, um and it's only a 38 on the stable decks. It's higher than blocks at a 25, but um but anyway, that the factors just looking at all four of these uh factors, so to speak, and weighs them in an intelligent way. Anyway, look at old ULTI. Its nav is up 19, but I mean, it's only at 22% on the stable decks. It its yield is all profit lately. It's 103 on the yol profit margin. I mean, it's doing great, but I mean, there's ones that are doing better all things considered.
Um, here's Top W down here. Top W's NAV is up 9.3, paying 36%.
E EGQ's, look at EGQ. EGQ's NAV is plus 34%.
All covered. The yield's only 5.8%. Of course, it's all covered.
My gosh. And that one's 79th.
Um, stable X is only a 31. I mean, to be in like the top 20, you have to have those types of stats and be like, you know, EDGQ has this better as good of stats or better than that last one we just looked at with like three times the stability, you know. So, that's, you know, it's there's a lot of competition on this list. It's good to see Feppy doing better at 17th on this list.
Feepy's now is plus 12% paid about a 23% dividend. Um, yeah, we should have Granny. We absolutely should. Let's make sure I spend all day maintaining the database. Granny is number 98.
Um, all right. Granny closed at 2130 on Friday. Pays a 9% yield, at least it has been so far. NAV is plus 6.87%.
It's 300% yield profit margin and a 70% on the stable X.
It's just getting hurt because its yields kind of low and it's and its NAV is good, you know, but I mean remember this is a relative metric.
So, I mean, it's but think about that.
Out of Granny's great because there's 400 on the list and it's 98. So, it's three out of every four are worse than Granny. I mean, you could be you could be H and be worse than Granny. MSST is worse than Granny. You could be NDIV, which is a really good one, but I mean, not lately. It's worse than Grucky.
Nothing wrong with Ducky except the NAV's basically going nowhere. You could be XV, you could be COOMD. So anyway, it to be in the top 100's good. I mean, believe I mean, so I'm not I mean, you know, any of these hell blocks is what was block 68th or something? 69th.
No, 69th. Okay. Yeah. Um, you know, Spy T, there's nothing at all wrong with that one. NAV's up 6% pays at 20% yield. Yields all profit. its real yield. It's a 91 on the stable decks.
Can Q is a not a great one actually. I mean, it only yields 4.3 and Snav is all right. But anyway, uh but you guys get my point. Uh GPIX is a good one and it's 57. Somebody says I need to make it the top 50 and really it probably ought to be the top 100, but it would just take too long, you know. I So Anyway, I I just think top I think top 40 is I almost think it ought to be the top 20, but I don't know. Maybe top 50 would wouldn't push it too much further, but I mean if we would have done top 50 this week, we would have had Tay, AAPW, CAIE would have made it. QDPL, EDGX, MAGO. Nothing at all wrong with MAGO.
Look at MAGO. NAV up 11.43.
Yield is about 14.8. 8 the the yield's all profit 308% profit margin on the yield. Stable decks is a 52.
Not great, but it's not uh it's not as bad as like Bloxs is or you know Blocks just really goes for the kind of the more home run, you know, it's only it's Yeah. I mean, you know, they're going to use the the more aggressive aggressive funds and it shows up in the stable nets. Yeah. So, we got Granny covered. Yeah. Magic 69. I was going to make a joke of 67 joke also, but I don't even Isn't 67 the number two anyway? 67 CG CGO. Um, let's But yeah, I really like this. So, what I'm trying to do today is this list is really cool and it's it's on a free preview at high yield uh lab.app, app, but I'm trying to make high yield app subscription like I've told you guys a million times, but the functionality I'm building in and I'm pulling my hair out now because I'm going back and forth between two AIS and sometimes they don't talk to each other, but I'm building in I built a tool right here for myself. This is just for me, the high yield lab fund categorizer. So, I can go through here, AAPW, and I can select what it is. If it was foreign, I could select it. you know, if it has a parent, I can type in the parent.
Anyway, but then this tool is like I don't know it it's I don't even know what you call it. It's like my GUI to control the list from the back end. You you guys will never have this one.
Anyway, I spent all day. There's 402 of these. Some of these are like five different things. Look at Sepy. I mean, SEPY is BTC crypto, big tech, active diversified, you know, uh, CGO is the CEF and it's foreign. Um, you know, a lot of the I know it doesn't look that hard. You're I mean, but yeah, I had to go through and I had to look I some of them I had to check uh, you know, some of them I didn't know and so I had to check like I wasn't sure about FAC, but FAX is a closedin fund. know when it's foreign.
Okay.
Uh and I put all kinds of new categories on here like uh FiAx. FiAX is bonds, but you can either be bonds, bills, loans, preferred equity, gold and silver, commodities, MLP, REIT, BDC, auto callable, leverage, fund of funds, lightning spreads, convertibles, AI. I have AI on here twice. Um but they it's fixed in the other version of this. But anyway, so I spent all day doing that.
So we can have uh something like a yield hound where you can say, okay, well you can put a ticker, but then like you can say search and you can say underliner parent. Okay, you can say I want an AMDbased fund that yields 20%. They're probably all going to yield 20% in match all or match any. Uh, match all, I guess. All right. You have AMDW, AMD Y, and AMY. However, if you want one an AMD fund that's lightning spreads, well, there are none. Okay. Well, that sucks. Well, wonder if you want an AMD fund that's not callable. I thought, well, I thought there was an auto callable AMD. I think there is. I need to work on I need to work on this some more. It's not going to go live till Tuesday. I'm going to try to make this live a Tuesday, but I'm trying to build in a lot of functionality for you guys.
Hell yeah, dude. I love to do this stuff. Let's go look at AGH. Hell yeah.
I know all about AGH because in my little backend, I remember categorizing it and I had to look it up to make sure it was right. But AG's parent is Agg.
We'll actually look at the results also.
Uh AGH, it's it's it's bonds. It's from Simplify.
Well, you see, you can have a parent or a stepparent. And I put it stepparent as a GG, but maybe I need to relook at that. Let's let's go look. A Gh. Let me see why I did that.
Um, well, AG simplified it because it doesn't really have AG in it. Some of these will actually have the stock AG and this doesn't. This is doing it through derivatives, but it's definitely based on AG. So that's its steparent if you're looking for a bond fund. So you can go to Yield Hound and if you didn't know about it already, you could find it and you could find ones that compete against it. See, watch this. Let's put in AG.
There's no autocallable AGS. And this one doesn't have any autocolables at all. Not with the minimum 20% yield. I wonder how you turn the yield off. Okay.
Well, look at this. OBV OBV has AG.
It's OBV sell trades AG.
Um, and then I also have notes on a lot of these where but I don't know how to read the notes where you can read stuff that I wrote about it. But anyway, okay. So now but to your question to your question, let's let's go check a GGH.
It's number 300. Come on. What the heck?
What in the heck? Number 300. You got to be kidding me. This one sucks.
No. So, this one is the opposite of the one we just looked at. This one, three out of every four or better, but not really better. Remember, this is a trading index. This I mean it. So, it's been better lately. Let's just say I mean it's not the worst looking. I mean, it's NAV is down 2.4 for paying a 7 and a half% yield. You don't buy this for momentum. You buy this to have exposure to bonds. You know, that's what a lot of people would. You also the yielded does pay or it's super stable. It's at 212% on the stable decks. Pretty soon I'm going to have beta in here so you can see the uh the correlation to the spy.
Um but that's coming soon. Um, but yeah, there's AGH right there. Heck yeah. It's doing better than Carvani doing worse than Salty. Well, you know that's bad when you're doing worse better than Salty or when Salty's doing better than you. But anyway, something has to be ranked ahead. I mean, uh, the reason Salty probably the reason is because their yields a lot higher even though their nav's lower once you factor and everything. Um, hey Zorox, what is up? You're not a big payer, but you should have a top worst 50. Yeah, stay away and run from. Yeah, not a big payment. Yeah. No, it was uh I think that's unfairly too low. I think it should be higher than some of these. I was just thinking about the logic of this, but this is just percentile ranking on four different categories.
The And like I say, Hey, Jackson, what do you want, buddy?
All right. Sorry about that. Um, yeah, when you have the bond once, lots of times you do it to have uncorrelated income, alternative income to to the spy. So, but but like I say, once when Yield Hound's up and running, you can go see, okay, I need some bond ones. Let's forget about AG, but let's just look at the bond ones. Maybe bonds and bills.
Okay, well, there's only one that has both of them, GVI. Okay, well, let's look at bonds. Um, so you got HYHG, you got all your yields, you got Juicy.
Juicy is not from Defiance. Come on.
Come on. I've already fixed that. Um, Juicy's from Aptus and Juicy's from Aptis.
And but I'm having problems getting the projects to talk to each other.
Obviously, I probably need to go work on this. But then, yeah, it's right there. Juicy's aptus. And I've exported this JSo I've told him that. Uh, juicies from Atus.
Anyway, I'm out of data right now till 10 o'clock, so I decided to come on and do the show. Um, but I I'll have all those little uh problems fixed. I think the yield Well, man, the yield hound should have caught that because it caught all this other stuff. It knows the juicy is Bonds and let's see Juicy. Yeah, it's definitely Bonds, but I updated it to say Aptus. It just hasn't saved it yet.
My bad. Well, I'll get it all worked out. Um 402. That's a huge listing. Um what do you mean it's a huge list? So is who's 402? Was somebody ranked 402? Let's go see who's ranked last. Somebody has to be last. It's G O L Y from Is that really from Strategy Shares? G L Y.
Where's my microphone?
Can't find my microphone. Can you guys hear me? Oh, there it is. I put it over here. Okay. All right. Sorry about that.
Uh, Gy See how strategy shares golden enhanced.
I mean, it's just got killed. I mean, it's dropped in like a month from 40 to 28.
So, and it follows the it has some LQD in it.
24. So those are corporate bonds and then it has some it's a fund of funds.
This one this one would should be in the fund of funds category. It should also be in the gold category.
Um let's go see where it is.
goalie strategy shares.
It's in the bonds and gold and silver category. It also be ought to be in the fund of funds. Anyway, I'll go get all I'll go get all that uh all that worked out here pretty soon. There's 11 of you guys here. There's any more you guys want to look at? Um we can definitely uh look at them. I have 45 more minutes until my um until my data resets.
But um we can look at anything you guys want to want to go see if the market's moving.
Pretty quiet night in the market.
I mean, silver futures up a little bit.
Let's look at Bitcoin.
Um Bitcoin is I mean down but barely anything. So, Bitcoin's definitely been I was going to say been pulling back a lot lately, but not really. It's been pulling back. Um, well, yeah, it has. I mean, it's pulled all the way back, you know, during the past month, it's pulled all the way back from 80 to 73, but it's been fairly stable for the past, you know, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, and then today it's we're trading in the same range as most of last week. What was alarming is when we broke out of this when we broke down out of this range.
Look at that. how when we came when we broke this low when we came back up and we failed again right at it. This is also a low volume node which often turns trends, you know, turns price around and it boy, it sure did down there. So anyway, um all right guys, well uh I guess I'll let you guys go. If there's nothing else you want to talk about, remember not financial advice. Consult a professional advisor.
Um, hit like and subscribe and uh be looking for the yield hound and uh the factor to go live um to go live soon.
All right, guys.
All right, guys. Well, thank you so much for being here. I appreciate it and I will talk to you guys soon. All right, I'll see you.
Related Videos
Truckers Finally Seeing Higher Rates⦠But Carriers Are STILL Going Bankrupt
LetsTruckTribe
480 viewsβ’2026-05-28
IS THIS THE REAL REASON FOR DATA CENTERS?
PrepperDawg
7K viewsβ’2026-05-31
JPMorgan CEO JUST NUKED Mamdani... as NYC's Middle Class COLLAPSES
Englishman-In-NewYork
7K viewsβ’2026-05-30
The Dark Age Of Blue Collar Has Begun
derekpolasekofficial
4K viewsβ’2026-05-28
Why People Pay More For Someone They Trust
financian_
66K viewsβ’2026-05-28
What has a broader economic impact, corporate downsizing or ecological collapse?
theratracejournal
1K viewsβ’2026-05-29
China Is Quietly Buying Gold, the Iran Deal Is Frozen, and Silver Is Heating Up
RichardHolloway0
694 viewsβ’2026-05-31
Why Canadians can no longer afford to survive #canada #inflation #shorts
TrueNorthInvestor-v4j
131 viewsβ’2026-06-01











