YELLA BEEZY MURDER TRIAL: FINAL DAY TAKES A DARK TURN! SECRET SNITCH EXPOSED & LYRICS WEAPONIZED"

[00:00:00]All right, let's get into the court side of this because we got actual video footage. Your >> honor, the court heard repeatedly the name Roy P regarding how this feud got started. It's in the grand jury testimony and Louisville PD even asked the defendant, does this feud have anything to do with Roy Pay? And he said, I think so. Now, this the shooting and the death of Roy P will not be admitted as or be evidence against the defendant that he committed it. It's merely going to be suggested as the starting point between the feud between the parties. And we know that it has something to do with this feud because hours after his death, the defendant is shot while driving home multiple times.

[00:00:42]Lewisville PD asks tells him the next day that the vehicle that pulled alongside of him belongs to the deedent's head of security.

[00:00:50]Two months later, more sprinter vans shot up. Now, both of these shootings are not extraneous offenses committed by the defendant. They are not other bad acts committed by the defendant. They are not 44B evidence. Rather, they are contextual pre-existing events that led and explain why the offense occurred.

[00:01:09]They go to motive, your honor, because 2 months after Moore is shot or his van is shot up, the deedent releases his song 219. And in that song, he makes certain declarations that he is responsible for both shootings. Now, these declarations, these statements against interest, leave no doubt in the defendant's mind who's responsible for the attempt on his life or the attempt on Mo's life. It is the state's theory, your honor, that the defendant and co-conspirator Moore conspired to finance the murder in retaliation for the attempts on their life.

[00:01:42]The state's case is further supported by the subsequent events that occurred afterwards. We heard from Detective Barnes concerning the unruly citizens concert there. Detective Barnes and his partner felt they needed to step in because the violence had escalated to the point that it would be dangerous for the general public. Again, this event, the event in of itself is not 44B evidence, but what we do get is the defendant's admissions after the event, right? And the court got to see his social media post right afterwards that goes directly to motive.

[00:02:11]And it is further evidence of ill will between the parties because he says it in If you recall, everything is not sweet on this end regarding his relationship to the deedent.

[00:02:20]Right after the concert, your honor, we have the Vladab interview where we get to see the defendant or hear him um attempt to say that he doesn't know who the deedent is. Right.

[00:02:34]>> See, the internet has tricked people into verifying how thugged out you are, how gangster you are, how whatever it is that you are supposed to be. as far as street, right? And that's cool. But when it come back and bite your ass, that's what it is. That's why if you've seen certain interviews of people when they say, "I'm a street dude. I'm a street dude. I'm a street dude." But they spend all their time in prison. No, you're not. A real street dude stay on the streets. That's why you don't take it to the goddamn internet.

[00:03:08]But uh it gets real intense. Y'all about to enjoy this one. Roll it. And then we get a good insight into his beliefs concerning forgiveness and his need to get the lick back. These admissions are pure motive evidence. After that, we have the defendant the defendant's attack on Rainwater, the deedant's manager. Then Moore is shot again. This time he's shot in the leg. Again, the shooting of of Moore is not 44B evidence. Two weeks later, the deedant is ambushed by Moore's associates at V Live in Houston. And then two months after that, we have the murder.

[00:03:40]This time timeline event goes directly to 3836 evidence about the prior relation. It's contextual evidence concerning an ongoing feud honor and it goes to show the motive of the parties and the jury should be entitled to know what transpired before and the state has a great need to show its case on motive as well as to corporate some of its witnesses testimonies.

[00:04:02]Since the majority of this evidence is not 44B evidence, the state plans to introduce most of this evidence contemporarously with states witnesses as they testified to the charge offense.

[00:04:11]And when we look at ultimately the amount of evidence that's going to be produced concerning the feud, it will be negligible in comparison to the amount of evidence that we're going to put on concerning the murder.

[00:04:21]Your honor, this evidence, the feud evidence is not unfairly prejuditial.

[00:04:27]Regarding the rap music, no Texas court or federal circuit court has ever drawn a bright line concerning rap music.

[00:04:35]The CCA and HARP and almost every federal circuit court, but I site to the sixth circuit in Kentucky recognize that rap music is highly prejuditial. But despite that recognition, they still conduct a 4-3 analysis here. Um, in my recent filed response, I cited to two recent cases.

[00:04:53]There are only two cases from Texas since Hart. It is Brown and Williams, Texar Canada and Fort Worth. Both of these courts adhere to heart recognized that rap music is highly prejuditial but still conducted their own 43 analysis.

[00:05:06]And in those cases, their lyrics were found to be more probative than prejuditial.

[00:05:10]While we don't prosecute individuals for rapping about music, your honor, in a murder prosecution, the lyrics can be probitative where they speak to the murder, the feud, the party's motives.

[00:05:23]You heard from Dr. Barnes. Lyrics do not drive his investigation. It's his investigation that leads him to the lyrics. Even Dr. Neielson conceded that sometimes events in lyrics can be true.

[00:05:38]Last week we heard about rap music concerning how it deplets and glorifies criminal activity and violence.

[00:05:45]And it speaks to and depicts guns, drug trafficking, the gang lifestyle, degragation of women, foul and overly aggressive and sexually implicit language. But the songs that the state has selected do not contain all that. In fact, they they are braggadocious about criminal activity, but the criminal activity mentioned is directly on point to the charged office. They talk directly about placing bounties for reprisal. They talk about the murder and they talk about the feud. In fact, all but one of the cases, your honor, reference directly to the deceit.

[00:06:13]So, let's let's say let's just go ahead and say what he said is true, which in my opinion ain't really true. It's just some rap [ __ ] Anyways, did they ever talk about how much? If you're going to bring this in eventually, you had to say how much. If Nash said, "Yo, I'm the dope ass basketball player." You say, "No, the hell you not, I'll stop you." The damn things that I better say next are how many I'm going to drop on you, what I'mma do to you, and literally how I'mma brag about it afterwards. But if I never say, "Yeah, bro, I'm going to drop 21 on you. You going to score zero." That doesn't make me a great goddamn basketball player. See, when they're not talking about the numbers, that's when I start to go, "Man, you just using rap for some bullshit."

[00:07:08]Because he admits it. He says it's probitative. He's saying that yeah, this it it absolutely will make the jury in basically sit in a space in the place where they go, "This is some violent ass [ __ ] he talking about. He already guilty." Yeah.

[00:07:28]Nah. Hell no. You can't say, in my opinion, you can't say, "Yo, this is all bad, but your ass didn't drop a damn number." Because if it was really about you putting bounties and [ __ ] when what's C's name? Um, Young Dolph got killed. He put in the song. They got a hund on my head. These is his exact lyrics.

[00:07:50]Hit us the first case. And the first song, this is the one that does not reference the demon, but the court heard from Detective Barnes. Why it's important. During this feud was the first time the defendant ever talked about placing a bounty on someone.

[00:08:05]Then we have kicking in the streets.

[00:08:07]Grand jury testimony shows that this song is a direct response to to the civil suit. The timing of that song, the context of the song is progative. It goes to the ongoing feud. It goes to motive and it shows the escalating violence between the parties on your head. This song is a direct is directly on point to the charged office.

[00:08:24]Both Moore and the defendant talk about placing bounties for reprisal and Moore takes it one step for further. He says he's put 50 bags on the demon.

[00:08:34]Grand jury testimony will show you that this song is eerily on point to the chart office.

[00:08:40]>> So that's that right there literally is the [ __ ] I'm talking about. If you're going to say there's a bag on somebody's head, it has to be a certain amount or you just talking. And he said that it's a 50 ball. So if they're able to show through text, through transactions, and all this [ __ ] it's a 50 ball. Yeah, yellow ass is fried. I I I don't know what the hell to tell y'all, but yeah, that would be proving exactly what the hell happened and that he was basically self snitching or what what do we call he basically shyed himself. Now, defense defense is going to argue that Moore's lyrics in that song shouldn't come in because he's not a co-criber.

[00:09:21]Well, Moore's lyrics come in for two other reasons. One, it's a statement against interest. And two, it's an adoptive admission by the defendant.

[00:09:28]These are commercially produced songs and performed by a defendant. He has full editorial rights and the fact that he kept it means he adopted.

[00:09:38]Take three. Mo 3. Take three. The title, the subject matter, the mockery of 219 or the mimicry of 219. The timing is so probative in this case, your honor, because hours after the murder, the defendant text messages this song to a codefendant, Jerry Johnson. And this song directly references the deedent, the murder, and placing bounties for reprisal. Equally as a pro as probative, your honor, is gassed up. We saw evidence that it was composed days after the murder. It appears not to be finished, according to Dick Barnes. But just the same, it was text messaged to Jerry Johnson. Again, another never-before released song. It speaks directly to the feud, the murder, and contains threats of continued violence towards his HMS associates.

[00:10:23]Next we have the computer uh co-conspirator songs hypocrite laugh now shirt we heard from Dr. Neielson he says that these are celebratory songs of the murder of Mo three here more lists out several autobiographical offense and when he does it he does it as justification for the murder as well as he outlines certain details of the murder in all three cases. This is probative of retalatory motive and goes to the conspiracy.

[00:10:50]In fact, laugh now is probably the most important of the three because this is the song that he previews to the defendant during that Instagram post call live, right? And we get an opportunity to see the defendant's facial expressions as he's listening to the song, as he's reading the follower comments, and it reeks of consciousness of guilt. Now, in that situation, the state wouldn't be admitting that song for the truth of matter. It would go to his state of mind, the consciousness of guilt and motive.

[00:11:16]Authorship defense raises the issue of authorship concerning these songs. Uh yet in their motions, they concede that these songs are artistic expression of the defendants. Um and that's because they're raising a first amendment uh claim. You don't have first amendment rights to words that are not yours or speech that isn't yours. More more importantly, if we look at the cases where authorship is called into question, it is not commercially produced songs performed by the artist.

[00:11:44]Authorship is authorship is not an issue here.

[00:11:47]>> That's going to be some BS because you're basically painting with a wide scope. If I say these songs aren't written by me, but they're also freedom of speech, it still doesn't refute either or. That that doesn't make any damn sense. You're basically saying, "Yo, uh, he he wrote the songs and it's not freedom of speech." And I'm saying, "I didn't write the songs and those songs are freedom of speech."

[00:12:16]That's still saying the same [ __ ] Two different ways to look at the same thing. You can't allow this [ __ ] in because one, it's not mine, and two, it's freedom of speech, so it shouldn't be in there. That's called doubling up on your order, not know. Oh, you man.

[00:12:31]Yeah. That's why I I despise a lot of DAs because they play that [ __ ] in people's faces and at times we eating to go, damn, he got a point. He doesn't have a point.

[00:12:42]That's you. That that's you saying, "Nah, man. Nah, that [ __ ] ain't true."

[00:12:47]And on top of that, even if it was true, this right here, >> as you heard from Detective Barnes, these were not just words. People were dying. He further told us that everyone in this case has been shot.

[00:13:03]This evidence, your honor, is not unfairly prejuditial.

[00:13:07]Your honor, the state is going to ask this court deny the defendant's motion eliminating and allow the jury to hear the full story to understand the motivations between the parties and to understand what transpired that led to this murder. Thank you.

[00:13:19]>> To me, you only made a case about maybe one or two songs. You only made a case for one or two songs at max. So that's the vacuum that he's trying to use in is to incorporate five damn songs. You you didn't do that.

[00:13:36]You're supposed to make an argument for every single one. We seen in the feds where they say this song right here for Lil Durk says this right here and then this song right here says this right here and this song right here says this right here and this song right here says this right here. He only referenced really two songs in the [ __ ] that he's talking about. And if the judge don't pick up on that, then y'all y'all screwed over there at max two songs.

[00:14:02]>> May please a court honor. We just heard Mr. Delis say that the evidence they seek to admit isn't 404 B2 evidence said 44B. I assume it means 44 B2, but it goes to motive. One of the exceptions to get in evidence not directly related to the crime of the court notes as an exception to 44 B2 is motive. So, he said that these aren't extraneous ev uh these aren't extraneous acts or offenses, but every piece of evidence the state wants to present to the court that doesn't go directly to the murder of Mo 3 um is listed in the state's amended noted extraneous evidence dated July the 8th, 2026. So, now suddenly the state is pivoting away from this being 404 B2 or even 3836. is simply being evidence showing my client's motive. Um, it's important for the court, your honor, to um, distinguish between words and deeds and between ideas and conduct.

[00:15:00]What the rap music in this case are words and deeds of Mr. Conway. Um, this is what he does for a living. You know, some of it, especially what we heard from uh, the various more aka trap boy Freddy is distasteful. uh in some people's eyes, but still they do have a first amendment right to make the music and to publish it. Can't be punished for exercising a constitutional right. And as a three judge panel um in the concurrent heart stated, your honor, uh singing about drugs, guns, and murder is nothing new. It's as prevalent in our culture as singing about gone and love.

[00:15:38]But what these lyrics and music videos have in common is that they are artistic expressions.

[00:15:44]Using someone's art in the guild instance phase of a trial only as character evidence has a potential of being unfairly prejuditial. That's exactly what the state's trying to do in this case. Um now Hart another distinction I want to put on Hart. It differs in our case only from our case only in the context of the introduction of the rapid by the state. Hart was convicted of capital murder the same offense for which Mr. Conway's charged.

[00:16:06]In part, the defendant testified and upon the um conclusion of his direct testimony, that's the point that the state moved to admit evidence of his rap music. The court criminal appeal still reversed Hart and grant him a new trial.

[00:16:24]Even though the defendant in Hart took the stand and the rap music that was admitted was as a rebuttal of Mr. Combo has not taken the stand in this case.

[00:16:35]Now, I'm not sure how hard the state's pushing the notion that Mr. Moore, aka Trap Boy Freddy, isn't a co-conspirator.

[00:16:44]We heard last week Detective Barnes um make an analogy at, you know, with like the CEO of UPS who sent employees out to do things. Um Mr. Come is not the CEO of anything. He doesn't control trap boyfriend. He doesn't control any of the individuals involved in this case.

[00:17:05]What controls whether a person is a co-conspirator is Texas code 701.

[00:17:11]That's a co-conspiracy statute that goes directly to the charge or primary offense. What I believe the state's trying to do by trying to introduce all this extraneous evidence is they're trying to peg my client with Pinkerton liability as I explained in my brief which is section 702 party liability.

[00:17:30]We don't have any Pinkerton liability issues in this case, your honor. And I and I went into great detail about the difference between the two on pages 7 through nine of my brief.

[00:17:39]>> I don't know if it was on Instagram, which y'all should follow me on Instagram at Sydney Ash one word, or if it was on here where I said, bro, they going to have to throw Trap Boy Freddy up under the bus because it makes sense.

[00:17:52]You don't see Yellow Bezy rapping any songs with Trap Boy Freddy making fun of Mo3.

[00:17:59]Trap Boy Freddy isn't. once again arrested for any of his [ __ ] either, which means his lyrics really don't mean a damn thing because Trap Boy Freddy didn't do anything so far that we know.

[00:18:14]And that's the point that they were trying to make there is if if these lyrics are so bad and they told and foretold of people doing bad acts because of some writing or some audio being recorded over beats, then why isn't this other person there? Because I mean, [ __ ] y'all acting like this is the nail in the coffin, which the dang prosecutor says, really, we got text messages and witnesses that going to prove everything we're saying. But if you had it that dang strong, why is it that you're not sitting up here pursuing trib? Would some people call it snitching? They could, but I wouldn't say that. I would I would say that he's using it to say, bro, it's really not that deep. The actual alleged co-conspirators in this case are Jerry Johnson, Kiwan White, and Deon Brown.

[00:18:59]Why? Because they've been indicted. I attach the copies of the indictments in the appendix under 801 E2E, Texas rules of evidence 801 E2E. Their statements, if it's in furtherance of the conspiracy, could be admitted, but they haven't made any substance statements in this case, which is why the state's not trying to introduce any of their statements. They're trying to introduce every statement either public or private that Trap Boy Freddy's made.

[00:19:25]Again, Trap Boy Freddy is not a co-conspirator. He's not a co-conspirator under section 701. Uh they're trying to allude that he's a co-conspirator under Pinkerton liability and section 702, but there's no evidence of it. They introduce no evidence.

[00:19:39]Detective Barnes himself stated, he testified under oath that at this time there's no probable cause to arrest Trap Boy Freddy.

[00:19:54]And we we keep hearing about a conspiracy and the state's attempt to introduce songs and statements made after Mo's murder. Uh the law is clear, your honor, as I point out on pages 11, 12, and 13, the alleged conspiracy in this case ended on November 11th, 2020 at about noon when Mo was murdered. Nothing said or done after that is evidence of a conspiracy unless it's for concealing the alleged crime. Now, does the state alleged that anyone involved whether as an actual or alleged co-conspirator did anything to conceal?

[00:20:30]No, the state is alleging the opposite.

[00:20:32]That they didn't just conceal it. They did the opposite. They sang about it.

[00:20:35]They went public about it. Those statements cannot be admissible, your honor, as I point out, under 801 E2E because the conspiracy, if anyone existed, ended on November 11, 2020 at noon.

[00:20:49]And further, um, there's a lot of case law on this that I pointed on page 13 of my brief. The statements made by the various individual in this case through rap music or through Instagram posts or Facebook live posts, um, they're not in the furtherance of a conspiracy, your honor. Um they're inadmissible hearsay and what they are is uh as the there are four types of statements that numerous Texas courts and published opinions have stated are not in furtherance of a conspiracy. I listed on case 13. The first one are casual admissions of culpability to someone the defendant had individually decided to trust. Mere narrative descriptions mere conversations between co-conspirators and puffing or boast by alleged co-conspirators. Right. This case has a lot of puffing. It has a lot of boasting, but that's all it has. Those statements specifically are not admissible as statements of co-conspirators.

[00:21:41]>> It It's funny how in one hand there's all these allegations about people snitching and all that. And the lawyer for Yellow Bey say nobody has any statements that's tying Yellow Bezy up to it and all of this stuff, which is pretty damn interesting.

[00:22:00]That means to me the evidence that they have is pretty damn bad because you're either going to hear from somebody that knows him real well and can show all of this [ __ ] or a middleman who got paid from Yellow Bezy to pay these cats or whatever the hell the case may be. But also too, and he's he's basically laying out like, "Bro, they're talking about a lot of this [ __ ] that happened afterwards and all this shit." Well, that ain't a real good argument because they're basically saying, the prosecution is saying he's rapping about how he got this [ __ ] done. You can't MAKE THAT GODDAMN THAT ARGUMENT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE. But then again, we'll see cuz I'm that part I thought that was a bad argument. I'm going be honest. That That's a bad argument to me. You're saying that these cats wouldn't write songs about how they got away with it?

[00:23:01][ __ ] Yeah. All right. I'm sorry. I would have been hit the road. Don't you come back no more. No more. No more. No more. Next, your honor, we heard Detective Barnes make a comment that Mo 3's interview um with Cam Capone on April 6th, 2019, which was a little over 18 months before his death was as close to a dying declaration as we can get. I asked the court to order the state to instruct Detective Barnes that he cannot say dying declaration. That was not a dying declaration, Ro. A dying declaration is controlled by rule 804 B2. And one of the important aspects is that the declarant must have realized that it was a death door. Now, we don't know exactly obviously what was going through Moe's mind. Detective Barnes speculated and said that well he you know had a general bad feeling that you know he might get hurt in some way sometime in the future. But we don't know what else type of conflicts Mo3 was into. Um he was a rapper. Um he was a provocative rapper. He the evidence shows that he manufactured the beef largely manufactured the beef with Mr. Conway for commercial purposes. That's you know we heard from Dr. Milson that's what these individuals do. They make up beefs. They manufacture them to cause controversy. Why? Because your honor controversy sells. Um, an uncontroversial, friendly person usually isn't an interesting person. And in our society, especially with social media and music, it's the edgy person, the person who says, you know, say crazy things sometimes. That's the person who's interesting. That's the person who draws attention to himself. That's the person that people will pay to listen to. Now, the Texas case is relied upon by the state that um, Mr. Bella mentioned, Williams and Brown. Uh, first off, both those cases, your honor, were unpublished. They have no presidential value. Uh I just want to point out two brief issues with each case uh that I think are most relevant. In Williams, your honor, one witness um testified that they had made between 8 to 12 rap songs about the murder. So in Williams, your honor, the state put during the trial, the state put a witness on the stand who testified that he was either there or he helped the defendant make these videos or write the lyrics for these videos between 8 to 12 that discuss specific facts of the murder. We don't have anything like that here. What we have instead of Detective Barnes um speculating about what the meaning of the lyrics are, which as you heard Dr. Nielsson say, that just isn't possible because then you would have to assume that Detective Barnes can get into the heads of the uh rappers, which of course you can't do. Um and then Brown, your honor, the um rap music was admitted. Uh but it was admitted only after Brown got on the stand and testified that he didn't know the reason uh about uh his father's relationship with the woman, which was the state's theory about why he paid money to have his own father killed. Um he said that he wasn't angry about the relationship. He didn't know why his father died. Well, all that was rebutted by other witness testimony and also his own phone calls he had made from the county jail here or against. Again, I keep going back to it, but it's important to, you know, not know Mr. Conwood has not testified. Now, if he gets on the stand and makes certain, you know, statements that he has no idea um, you know, about why anyone's saying that like a certain song he made has anything to do with Mos's murder, then yeah, under impeachment, the state may be able to get into that, but he hasn't done that yet, your honor. So, I asked the court at minimum to hold off on admitting any of the rap songs that Mr. Conway made until we get to the point where it would maybe be admissible because he gets on the stand and testifies other than the um murder of Dwan Spikes for which someone already pleaded guilty um criminal district 4, your honor um in front of Judge Collins u Randall Hunter and cause number F1976608 pleaded guilty to the murder of Dewan Spice and received 20 years in prison.

[00:27:05]the state already has their defendant in that case. Uh to say that, you know, without there being any probable cause that Mr. Conway would have anything to do with these murders, it's so prejuditial to allow evidence of these murders into the guilt phase. Um because again, there's no evidence that Mr. Con had anything to do with it. Just because he may be tangentally associated with someone the state thinks may have done something in those cases doesn't make it admissible under any exception in this case during the guilance phase.

[00:27:35]And then you know you have the September 1920 shooting at V Live in Houston where Mo 3 was doing a show. You know in that case Dantavius Davis was shot in the head. Davis was one of the ones who ambushed Mo 3. Now even if Davis is associated with Trap Freddy's record label which is how the state is associating Davis with Mr. Conway. This has nothing to do with Mr. Conway. Again Mr. Conway didn't directly do the actions and missions on September 19 2020. He doesn't control these people.

[00:28:01]There's no evidence that again he is some sort of leader. You know, they're trying to pin Mr. Conway as some sort of leader of a gang. He's not a leader of a gang. He's not in a gang. He's never been accused of, you know, credibly accused of being in a gang. You know, they, you know, had pictures of this trap house in Oakliff that uh co-defendant Jerry Johnson owns that, you know, Kean White was seen in some of those pictures and um Theodore Thomas was seen in some of those pictures. Mr. going on has nothing to do with that trap house. There's no evidence that he went there to hang out, that he went there to deal [clears throat] drugs, to ingest drugs. I mean, that sort of evidence, your honor, is so prejudicial.

[00:28:40]And of course, you know, Detective Barnes on the stand speculating about the meaning of pictures, we heard a lot of that on Thursday and Friday. Of course, any reasonable juror is going to think, well, is Mr. Conway involved in that? If Mr. Conway might be involved in all these unadjudicated shooting for which Mr. uh Detective Warren says there's no probable cause to show that anyone's been charged or arrested. You know, they're going to think, well, if he may have been involved in that, maybe he did uh cause M3's death. That's why as the gatekeeper, your honor, we ask that you keep this evidence out during space.

[00:29:12]>> Now, normally most people would cut that last part up and divy it up and all that. And I I couldn't because this is what decides a lot of people's fate.

[00:29:25]This is what decides whether you walk out the damn doors. This is what decides whether your money can now go to somebody else's pocket because he can be sued. I believe he's being sued civily by Mo 3's estate, meaning Mo 3's family.

[00:29:44]and all the rappers cuz I know y'all watch this [ __ ] Y'all better be careful. This the street person [ __ ] That's fine. But to involve the actual streets, that's stupid.

[00:29:59]The prosecution paints Mo 3 damn near as somebody who got killed for some street rap [ __ ] and all this stuff and all the and everything. when the defense says Mo 3 was chasing this [ __ ] All right.

[00:30:18]Okay. We'll see how this plays out. I would point out that for the defense to say that Yellow Yellow Beas is this this grand standin person who's a superstar and all this [ __ ] Why didn't you admit any songs that he did that did Billboards and all this [ __ ] and compare and contrast and start where uh Mo 3 was opposed to where he ended with the quote unquote beef and then where Yellow Bezy was and where Yellow Bezy has been since the quote unquote beef.

[00:30:51]If you want to paint Mo 3 as a clout chaser, which in a certain sense he was, then do that. But to just sprinkle that [ __ ] doesn't make any sense. Now, all in all, it seems like the three dudes ain't telling. It seems like the one dude is telling from how they're stating it. And if that's the case, then I think Yellow Bezy has a very good chance to beat this. Because without the three people saying he paid me, all you have is somebody saying that I got paid by him to do said things and all of this [ __ ] which they're saying text messages.

[00:31:32]I'm not sorry in how I'm going to say this. It's all going to be up to interpretation.

[00:31:37]If you text somebody right now and you say, "Man, go get that [ __ ] done. Thank you."

[00:31:44]and you send a cash app and somebody happens to die, they can use them three I mean them two things and say yo sent the text message say go get it done and some money and then somebody died three things I didn't know how to want to spend that but you actually were paying for lawn care services and in the midst of that they got into a fight with somebody who does the lawn care services and basically [ __ ] they killed him. But they were complaining to you about how this person basically was pissing them off and all this [ __ ] and what should they do and you really ain't even indulging in [ __ ] Man, go get this [ __ ] done. Sent the money.

[00:32:36]Law can say you just put out a hit on somebody or you paid for a hit. So, we'll see. I believe it's going to boil down to interpretation. I don't believe they have a quote unquote smoking gun at all. I just I just don't. So, I give Yellow Beasley probably a 55% chance to beat it, 45% chance to lose. But this is all beginning stage phases. So, please don't hold me to that. If different things come out, then hey, it is what it is. But as it stands right now, I don't I really I can't see the judge making a decision past two songs. But it would not surprise me at all if the judge said, "Man, ain't none of this [ __ ] coming in." Because he's right. The defense lawyer, he's right. No goddamn rap expert lyrics or none of this [ __ ] None of this stuff. And for you to say you going to do your homework and investigation off of YouTube, YOU AIN'T A GOOD GODDAMN ANYTHING IF YOU'RE SAYING THAT. You're just not.

[00:33:38]You're going off of YouTube videos, bro.

[00:33:40]Do you know YouTube videos are subtle manipulation tactics for somebody who is likable to somebody who isn't? When y'all watch this dang channel? I get accused all the time of saying I mean I get accused all the time of being a little derk fan even though I literally listen to more Young Boy music than anybody, but whatever the hell. But I'm saying I haven't seen any of this [ __ ] right now. Everybody's coming around saying [ __ ] Durk actually is coming home. The question then becomes, was I a fan or did y'all dislike Lil Dirk anyways and believe the persona that he put on that he did all of this [ __ ] And that's what it boils down to.

[00:34:19]Likability, believability, and bias.

[00:34:25]But y'all, let me know y'all thoughts on this one. Next video that we will be doing will be the Nolan Wells autopsy video cuz they said a whole bunch of nothing, but they said a little something. And then there's another video that came out by Jackass Tatum, but we ain't going to do none of that.

[00:34:39]We just going to destroy his video. But until the meantime, click right here to see how Charles White almost got killed in the fifth ward of Houston, Texas yesterday. or click right here for the playlist and I will catch youall in the next