This video presents Dr. Philip Shock Matthews' research investigating how whiteness, as an evolving epigenetic and mimetic characteristic, manifests psychopathic and sociopathic tendencies through white fragility and antilackness, arguing that the legal construction of whiteness in colonial America created systems of domination that normalize violence and emotional detachment, with historical roots in Bacon's Rebellion where colonial elites divided poor Europeans and Africans to maintain power, and that these tendencies are best understood as inherent to the group rather than individual pathology, requiring understanding and dismantling of the psychopathic meme of whiteness to address systemic racism.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
The Psychopathic and Sociopathic Tendencies of WhitenessAdded:
American History Classroom and I'm your host, Professor Hicks and uh good morning here for an early broadcast and let's get right to it. Uh following on our discussion of Bacon's Rebellion and the psychopathy of white supremacy and whiteness.
We're now moving away from Bacon's Rebellion and we're going to move into the nit and uh or should I say the uh meat and potatoes of what we consider whiteness. uh remember our discussion uh of of Bacon's rebellion um summarize well basically I'll quickly summarize was how white people whiteness and black people and native people at some point got along in this country and with that uh we discussed all the different um aspects and dynamics of those relationships. Uh for instance, we talked about how they married, how they ran away together, how they had shared the same values, uh how it related to oppression, how they both were oppressed by the same 1% of the uh elite in Virginia. And um basically, yeah, I think that's it.
Basically, we covered all of those dynamics. So today we want to talk about we're going to separate all whiteness from Bacon's rebellion and talk about how it has evolved here in America and the world mostly.
So in order to do that we're going to start off with a paper by Dr. Philip Shock Matthews. And if you haven't heard of him, please go on YouTube and jump in and jump into his channel. His his podcast is wonderful. I've been a part of it for many years. um haven't had a chance to actually speak on his broadcast because um well just didn't get there yet, but he has some wonderful um information. uh he is a psychiatrist I believe um and he addresses uh racism, white supremacy in all its forms by many different authors and speakers who come onto his podcast and he talks them talks to them about these types of issues particularly as it relates to black people. And on this particular paper that he's wrote, he's investigating the psychopathic and sociopathic tendencies in whiteness and how it relates to antilackness and white fragility and the implications for understanding and addressing systemic racism. Remember folks, our main goal here when we discuss whiteness, we're not trying to um uh um we're not trying to uh not heal ourselves. We want to heal ourselves on every at every instance that we can and all the time because living under this white racist regime can be very disconcerting can cause us trauma, stress.
Um, of course, you know, we can go on and on, but I think without getting too wordy, I think that's enough. I think just the trauma alone uh is something worth discussing so that we can alleviate ourselves from some of this.
You'll never ever do it completely because you know America is a racist country built on racist ideas and values. Uh it is very difficult to hide from it for any length of time. But I believe if we can better manage it, we can we can be able to uh by understanding it. I mean, manage it by understanding it. I believe we can then adapt to it and address it a little better. You know, we have these crazy people walking around here called Karens and I don't know what they call the males, but you know, you see this behavior and you wonder how and why. You see the president's behavior. You ask yourself how and why. you see the uh a white population, the police officer, their abuse uh that uh the the abuse that police officers directed a black men particularly, but black women too.
You ask yourself why you see the innocent nonreourse, no remorse, no empathy for the killings of people around the planet by whiteness. And you have to ask yourself why. So hopefully some of these questions will address that. All right.
So again, the paper is investigating the psychopathic tendencies of whiteness, white fragility, antilackness with the implications again of understanding and addressing the system.
All right. Now, what we're going to do here is first we're going to I'm going to give you the abstract and what the paper's going to discuss. Then we're going to move away from that and I'm going to take an objective view. I'm going to talk to chat GPT and give them this perspective and see what they have to say because as I always tell you, as I say many times, I like to be I don't want to say objective because there's no such thing as objective. I like to be fair. I like to give both sides of the story. So, taking it away from Dr. Philip Shock Matthews giving this same idea of white fragility psychopathic and sociopathic tendencies giving it to Chat GBT to see what they have to say about that in the context of Bacon's rebellion in the context of the authors that we've been u discussing over the last week or so in the context of what they see and then taking Dr. Matthew's uh uh investigation and you guys come up with what you think is the right uh um um response to this piece this article. All right. So let's first go through the abstract and the abstract on any type of peer-reviewed article or p or pages anything put in in the form of um documentation uh as an abstract and it's going to tell you ex briefly what the paper's about. Now, I'm not going to read the entire abstract because remember, we want to go to the uh fairness of it. Let's see what chat GBT uh has to say about this. And I I already picked chat because I use it uh many times and and sometimes it has some good stuff to it. Not all the time. All right? I don't depend on anything all the time. I do my own research and uh background stuff. All right? So um this abstract explores a concept of whiteness as an evolving epigenetic and mimemetic characteristics that influence the behavior and traits of white individuals. Now epigenetics is a new study that shows that behavior can be passed biologically. We always think of things in terms of DNA um and that it be inherent in you biologically. But epigenetics says something like abuse of people or even on yourself. You can pass this down to the next generation biologically. All right? But we're not going to get into in too much of that.
All right? Uh but we will we will. So it this article explores the concept of whiteness as an evolving epo ep epigenetic mimemetic. Mometic is the cultural aspect of development and this culture also like epigenetics can be passed down from generation to generation. Metic.
Okay. uh it suggests that the personality traits associated with whiteness are inherent to the group and manifest in psychopathic and sociopathic tend tendencies. However, society often avoids acknowledging this cognitive dissonance by renaming these tendencies as antisocial disorders.
This author proposes proposes dismantling the psychopathic mem of whiteness by embracing a counterme of first or prime frequency particularly among an individual's foundational black Americans and foundational black Britain's descent.
Okay, I think I want to read that one more time a little more smoothly. This abstract explores a concept of whiteness as an evolving epigenetic and mimemetic characteristic that influences the behavior and traits of white individual.
It suggests that the personality traits associated with whiteness are inherent to the group and manifest in psychopathic and sociopathic tendencies.
However, society often avoids this acknowledging acknowledgement and looks at this as a cognitive dissonance by the terms of antisocial disorder.
Okay. Now, the reason why society often looks at psychopathic and sociopathic tendencies, particularly as they relate to white folks, as antisocial disorder, because antisocial disorder is a very sanitized and clean way to describe white fragility, psychopathic, and sociopathic tendencies.
But we believe many social scientists believe that psychopathic and sociopathic is the term is the descriptive term of white tendencies in their behavior.
All right. Now let's see what before we go into Dr. Shock Matthews and remember Dr. Philip Shock Matthews has a podcast.
Check it out. All right. So let's let's try to bring some balance to this. All right. Let's let's give the same term to to chat GBT and see what he says about this argument about this paper. And I call it a key. It should be called an it you know messing with these uh technologies man. It's just I don't know where it going with this stuff but anyway let's go. So um chat tpt says whiteness and aggression debate. They call it a debate. I don't really see a debate, but let's let's let's let chat tell us what it thinks. The passage in your image presently a highly controversial and sweeping argument that attempts to connect historical construction of whiteness with concepts from psychology such as psychopathy and sociopathy and appetitive aggression.
I'm going say that one again because you probably never heard of it before, but aitive aggression. It cites academic work on violence and aggression that applies these concepts broadly to European and white populations. This kind of argument should be approached carefully because it combines legitimate historical analysis with speculative and generalized psychological claims. Now, when you speculate on something, it means you're like you're not sure about it, but you're looking into it. You're investigating it, but you not made any conclusions about it. All right, so let's see. So number one, let's explore this. So chat GPT labels number one as what the passage is saying. So the first thing chat is going to address generally what the passage is saying. The excerpt argues that violence can be pleasurable to some individuals due to biological responses such as adrenaline, endorphins, testosterone, and serotonin. These are all fall under hormones. Number two, psychological psychologists describe this repetitive aggression, meaning taking pleasure in violence or the kill.
All right. Historical trauma in medieval Europe. This is very important folks. In medieval Europe, historical trauma in medieval Europe may have shaped certain behavioral tendencies.
Keep number three in mind. Number four, the creation of white identity in colonial Virginia and elsewhere in early United States serve to divide poor Europeans and Africans and protect elite interest. And we talked about that extensively and here chat somewhat picks up the same argument. Number five, therefore the author suggests that the social category of whiteness may have been associated with displaced aggression and domination. Now when they say displaced they means that instead of the anger being directed towards the person who it should be it's been displaced and placed on others that may not be in the circle of the person who should be receiving the aggression. So you displace this aggression instead of uh blaming uh whoever was responsible for causing this anxiety in you, you blame it on the victim. All right? The victim is the reason why. Okay? We find a lot of this in American history as well as American psychology and American psyche. Blaming the victim.
All right. Second argument Chad is making that the valid historical cause.
So Chad is saying the valid the valid historical core. It's going to give us the core of the argument and it's going to now it's going to intersperse it with Allan Dubois and Zen's argument that we presented earlier. That's why it's important to stay with this stuff as they talk about what whiteness is and how it was created in Virginia. So let's see what chat says. the valid historical core. The strongest the most widely accepted part of the argument is historical rather than psychological. I don't agree. But let's see.
Theodore Allen, the first person we used in our discussion earlier. He's an author, a white author. I always have to mention that because, you know, again, not a fairness. Theodore Allen argued that in the invention of the white race that colonial elites in Virginia created the legal category of white after Bacon's rebellion to divide laborers and Europeans and African descent. Howard Zen, a p of a people's history of the United States, similarly argued that racial divisions were deliberately strengthened to prevent class solidarity.
Jacqueline Balora, who we didn't use much, but she's very important to this argument. In her book, The Birth of a White Nation, explains that white became a legal category used to confer privileges and maintain hierarchy and I will add social order.
These scholars focus on law, economics, and power, not innate biology. So Chad is trying to imply or suggest that these authors do not see whiteness as a racial or should I say a biological inherence.
Number three, appetitive aggression. All right, a real psychological concept.
The excerpt referencing appetitive aggression, a recognized concept in psychology, says that some individuals may experience excitement or reward from violence.
Researchers often study this among combatants, gangs, and people exposed to repeated violence.
Now folks, as I'm reading this, I want you to always concept European behavior as you know it. Your life experience with European behavior in any form that you might have uh incurred, okay? School, work, uh play, relatives, whatever. So keep that in mind as I'm reading this. Okay? One more time. Repetitive aggression, a real psychological concept. This concept refers recognizes recognizes I should say psychology recognizes a repetitive aggression as a true issue but people have some individuals may experience excitement or reward from violence.
Researchers often study this among combatants, gangs and people exposed to repeated violence, competitive aggression. It does not imply that an entire race or ethnic group shares a pathological trait. Well, I don't think anyone's implying that, though. Those who have accepted and adopted whiteness seem to have these tendencies more than black people do. And because they are the dominant the dominant racial uh group, we see these behaviors time and time again. If you have lived in the black community, this concept of pettitive aggression applies to human behavior generally not to one population.
Now I want to add that one of the groups of people that a repetitive aggression seems to have have tendencies of are hunters.
And we all know mostly hunters are white folks. Not saying they're not black hunters. My dad used to hunt. All right?
But we know mostly we see that and this group is what the article Dr. Shock Shock's article is talking about as it relates to repetitive aggression. So when we get to the article all right we'll point that out because that's important to this argument. Number four where the argument becomes speculative.
Now Chat GBT now is going to try to find holes in Dr. shocks paper or speculation and and and I don't believe it's trying to disclaim it, you know, say it's not true, but it's brought it's being brought under the adjective of speculative.
The claim that whiteness itself is psychopathic or sociopathic is not a mainstream scientific conclusion. Okay, chat, don't defend him, but okay.
Important distinction. whiteness as a social system, a historical structure of privilege and exclusion.
I think there's someone who can agree with that speculation. White people as individuals, millions of diverse people with varied beliefs and behaviors. Many historians and sociologists critique whiteness as a system of power. But this is different from saying white people are biologically predisposed to pathology.
That's an argument or discussion we must have. All white people predisposed to violence.
H number five. A more accurate interpretation, says chat GPT. A more defensible formulation would be the legal invention of whiteness in colonial America created incentives that rewarded some Europeans for identifying with elite interests rather than with other oppressed groups. Okay, those group that group would be the persons who adopted whiteness. In certain historical context, systems of domination normalize violence and emotional detachment, but these behaviors reflect social and political structures rather than innate racial traits. Well, folks, I'm going to leave that up to you. We will discuss it though. The connection to Bacon's Rebellion. Since we have extensively studied Bacon's rebellion, this passage aligns with a key historical insight. A or should I say number one, poor Europeans and Africans sometimes cooperated. Colonial elites feared this alliance. New laws granted privileges to Europeans categorized as white.
These privilege fostered loyalty to the ruling class.
This is the historical mechanism behind the divide and rule thesis.
And we talked about divine and rule, not divine and divide and conquer. Divide and rule is a much more profound and practical uh thought and strategy.
Psychological interpretations of systems. Rather than saying whiteness is psychopathic, many scholars would say systems of domination can encourage emotional detachment.
Institutions may normalize exploitation.
Individuals may rationalize violence through ideology or cognitive dissonance.
These are social and psychological processes that can occur in many societies. But folks, we know and into, you know, giving response to Chad GBT, we know who this describes.
I could be more profound and say, does this describe black domination?
Have we ever seen this in a black domination form? No. This is all a part of whiteness and the domination of white people over the earth. Because this is not just about an American thing.
Whiteness has dominated, imperialized all over the earth. There is nothing they haven't touched.
All right. So chat GPTs gives it their assessment. It actually says my assessment like it's a person, but the passage combines historically wellsupported um I'm sorry. The passage combines historically well supported whiteness as a legal and political invention. Grace used to divide laborers, elite controlled through priv privilege, scientifically grounded but narrow a pettitive aggression as an individual psychological phenomena. They say chat says that's is scientifically grounded but it's narrow. It's too narrow to apply it to whiteness. highly speculative.
Applying psychopathy or psychop psychop psychopathy and sociopathy to an entire racial group is speculative.
Well, of course, we can't generalize anything about an entire group of people. Of course, we're talking about the dominant group that have expressed this whiteness in his behavior, white supremacy, and his actions and laws. Of course, not every white person has this stuff. There are many good white people, but we're talking about those folks that have been a part of the domination, exploitation, imperialism of people all over the world and African people in particular.
In conclusion, in conclusion, the most credible takeaway is that whiteness was historically constructed as a system of social control. We have some agreement on that particularly after Baker's rebellion to align poor Europeans with elite interest and to maintain racial hierarchy. Scholars such as Theodore Allen, Howard Zinn, Jaclyn Batalora, and WB De Boy provide substantial evidence for this historical argument. However, describing whiteness as inherently psychopathic or sociopathic extends beyond accepted scholarship and risk turning a structural critique into a biological generalization about people. Whiteness is best understood as a historically constructed legalist social system, not as an inherent psychological disorder.
All right, so there you have it. And I'm not going to argue this piece for now.
We're going to go right to Professor Shock's article.
All right. And we're going to go right into it.
All right.
All right. So, now I'm reading from the uh Dr. Rean Reverend Dr. Philip Shock's uh abstract, which we kind of read already. Uh let me go to some of his analysis.
Okay, give me a moment, folks.
All right, I'm going doing this very slowly.
All right, here we go.
Here we go. If I can get this thing whacking right, I'll be all right.
All right. So, we already talked about the abstract of Dr. Matthew's work. Um, that is an abstract is going this paper is going to I'm going to read it again.
You might have just joined me and want to know this this this abstract is going to I'm sorry this investigation is going to explore the concept of whiteness as an evolving epigenetic and mimemetic characteristic meaning that they can be transferred biologically that affluence behavior and traits of white individual.
It suggests that the personality traits associated with whiteness are inherent to the group and manifest in psychopathic and sociopathic tendencies.
All right, let's see the first part.
It encompasses the societ so societ so social societ excuse me folks societal norms systems and power structures that reinforce and perpetuate racial inequalities often at the expense of marginalized group.
Fragility, as coined by D'Angelo, refers to the defensive response and comfort or discomfort exhibited by some white individuals when confronted with discussion of race and racism. Again, while reading this paper, I want you to use your experiences, African people, and people of color that you might have had with your white counterparts when it comes to just discussion of racism. the fragility that is demonstrated by whites when these types of issues are discussed.
Let's go on.
All right.
To determine if there's any attitudinal link between whiteness and psychop psychop um psychopathy and sociopathy.
It is necessary to examine the attitudes, behaviors, and societal impact associated with whiteness and assess how they align with the characteristics of psychopathy and sociopathy.
So here, Dr. Matthews is now going to see if the attitudes and behaviors align with whiteness and fragility.
Frankenberg 1993 page one defines whiteness as a location of structural advantage. This concept highlights in the inherent advantages and privileges that white individuals experience within societal structures.
Building upon this understanding, D'Angelo 2018 page 113 introduces the introduces the notion of white fragility which specifically pertains to the defensive reactions and discomfort exhibited by white individuals when confronted with discussions of race and racism. At the end of her book, D'Angelo acknowledges her efforts to challenge and dismantle her own biases and become less white.
Yes, folks, this is a very good passage to stop and think about. How many white folks out there who are or have these privileges ever thought about being less white?
maybe going back to being Italian, Irish, or whatever without being white.
Like us black people need to learn how to be less black and be more African centered.
This is the first step in in challenging your own whiteness like Dr. D'Angelo has. Of course, as you can tell, these people are white.
D'Angelo Frankenberg.
Let's continue on Dr. shocks uh article. However, Katrice Jackson, now she's an African science, social scientist, offers a contra contrasting perspective in her book, Weapons of Whiteness. Jackson criticizes D'Angelo's theory and the development of white fragility, considering it a falsehood and a manipulative deception.
Jackson 2020 page 29. She asserts that white fragility presents no new information to black people and she rejects the idea that white individuals experience mental weakness when faced with racial stress. Jackson views it as a fraudulent and exploitative concept.
Hm. Let's see why these differing differing perspectives highlights the ongoing debate and critical discussion surrounding the concept of white fragility and its implications within the broader discourse on race and racism. Further examination and dialogue are necessary to deepen our understanding of these complex dynamics.
Yes, Miss Jackson's view is that white fragility is just another excuse, another rationale for white people to feel good about themselves even in light of their horrific horrific behavior.
What transpires when whiteness violently violently intrudes upon people of color?
Manakam 2022 suggests or asks, "Does the mere presence of black individuals generate such fear in white people that they instinctively resort to violence to alleviate their racial distress or racialized distress. A recent study by Shaw Walter at L 2008 investigated how the stereotype that young black men are threatening and dangerous has become deeply ingrained in the collective American unconscious.
Black men capture attention achen to evolve threats such as spiders and snakes. Let me clarify that. So, Troll Walter is saying that the black young black men, the the threat and danger, this illusion of threat and danger has been so ingrained in the white psyche and black psyche as well that it is almost similar to what people are or how people react to spiders and snakes.
That's a profound statement because we all grow up scared of spider snake, not even knowing anything about the spider or the type of snake or whether it could bite or not, whether it's poisonous or not. But it has been he's comparing this this this this inculcation to being ingrained. He's comparing it to being ingrained like we have been ingrained with the fear and threats of spiders and snakes.
I have walked down the street and seen young black men approaching and have also had some anxiety and I'm I'm black. I'm African-American.
How does that how does this piece of literature account for that? Because living in America, folks, you cannot recognize America without racism.
It has been socialized and taught to us all. Even black people fear young black crowds.
Why? Not because the young black crowd did anything to them, but because the propaganda, the deleterious propaganda, the ingrained thought of racism, the colorization, the hierarchy of whiteness has implanted these thoughts well in our minds and our hearts. Whether you are black or white is the nature of America.
As I always say, racism and white supremacy is like baseball and apple pie.
Jackson criticizes white fragility for its failure to address the inherent racism or the lack of mental strength among white individuals to engage in racial conversations.
You can't you can't apply racism for every excuse or you can't apply your your sense of racism for everything you do.
You can't say it's white fragility and forget that it's racism implanted in you.
She considers this stance pathetic, stating that white fragility has gotten black folks killed, lynched, arrested, falsely accused, and incarcerated.
Thank you. and emphasizes that their lack of empathy for black bodies leads to punitive actions such as write-ups at work, suspensions at work, terminations, and consequently Jackson suggests replacing the term fragility with manipulation.
Now, let's talk about I'm going to take a break here. We're going to go to something really quick. Let's define some of these terms.
For example, let's define sociopath. A sociopath is a person um more often shaped by the environmental factors such as childhood trauma, abuse or severe instability. They are erratic, a sociopath, easily angered, a sociopath, and prone to out and prone to emotional outburst. While they may struggle to fit into society or hold steady jobs, they often feel limited guilt or empathy towards certain people in their immediate circle. Psych psychopath similar to sociopath is primarily psycho is primarily rooted in genetics and brain structure under development of brain regions responsible emotional regulation. They are highly calculated, controlled and emotionally detached because they can mimic normal emotions pro and project superficial charm. They are highly capable of manipul manipulating others without being detected.
These are people who fall into the path of who who you know you read about these crazy people who abduct these kids and kill them because like sociopath they are detached from empathy and remorse.
They feel no guilt. They feel no remorse about their behaviors.
And the final one before we go back to our paper is competitive aggression.
Unlike um it is more commonly studied in environments such as combat zones, gang warfare among individuals exposed to chronic violence where aggression becomes normalized and rewarding. A psychological concept referring to violence or aggression that is perceived by the aggressor as a source of pleasure as a source of excitement or as a reward rather than a necessary defense. Okay.
So, repetitive aggression, psychopathy, psych psychopathy and and a psychopath and a sociopath. Let's get back to our paper.
Okay.
Okay. Okay.
Let's go back to what Jackson says.
Jackson criticizes white fragility. She says that white fragility does not address inherent racism. So if you're going to say this white person who got into a discussion with you about race or you brought it up and that person just went totally crazy, she is saying this, she she criticized and said this is also rooted in racism. It's inherent. It's a part of him or her. It's come with them to wherever they are meeting.
All right.
Defining psychopathy and sociopathy.
Okay. Now, we're going to let um Professor Shock Matthews define psychopathy.
Psychopathy and sociopathy. Okay.
Psychopath and sociopath share a similar set of traits and have a poor inner sense of right and wrong.
Remember, think about whiteness today and can't seem to understand or share another person's feelings. Albeit psychologists today and diagnostic and the statistical manual of mental disorders DSMB4 DSMBB4 do not use a term psychopath and sociopath as formal diagnosis anymore. I wonder why when we have plenty of them got one sitting in the White House but they the DSMB4 does not use it anymore. Now by the way the Diagnost Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders is a book. I've used it. It's a book that psychologists, psychiatrists, therapists in the do in the form of in the under the dome of um psych psycho psychological sciences. They use the DMV to analyze disorders and also to give prescriptions to patients who might um be suffering more from one of these disorders. The DSM4 shows you what to prescribe for them. Okay. So, it's it's in use still to today.
All right. So, the DSM mental disorders book do not use the term psychopath and sociopath anymore. Okay? It's written by white folks. Of course, they're not going to use it anymore because white folks don't study themselves. You know, I read something yesterday from an anthropologist, a white anthropologist who said that one of the problems with white scientists, social science, they don't study their own history. They don't study Europe as we're going to go through Europe. We're going to find out these traumatic or behaviors that uh Dr. Matthews has talked about the trauma from the medieval period that might have shaped this psychopathic and sociopathic behavior. It didn't just appear, folks.
It comes from something.
All right? So instead, the sociopath and psychopath are referred to as anti-personality disorders. APSASBD.
Of course, it's very sanitized when you say something is a personality disorder.
Anybody could have a personality disorder, but not anybody could be a psychopath, a sociopath. No.
All right. So, um this this disorder is diagnosed. This diagnosible personality disorder is characterized by a pervasive pattern of disregard for the rights of others, the safety of themselves. The disregard for the safety of themselves.
Yes. Risky behavior by white people, you know, jumping off mountains and flying out of planes and climbing up mountains with no this this is them. The safety of themselves, impulsivity and socially accepted norms and rules. Let's read that again. So this uh ASPD this psychological personal disorder is diagnosed personality disorder characterized by pervasive pattern of disregard for the rights of others, the safety of themselves and others, the disregard for the safety of themselves, impulsive impulsivity, and the socially accepted norms and rules. According to an FBI report, the most dangerous of all personality disorders is psychopaths.
The term psychopath refers to a personality personality disorder with a cluster of interpersonal affective lifestyle and antisocial traits and behaviors. These in these involve deception, manipulation, as Krice suggested, and person Irresponsibility, impulsivity, impulsivity.
You know, you've seen the Karens.
Stimulation seeking, poor behavioral controls, shallow affect, meaning you're easily to be angered. Lack of empathy, meaning regard for others, you have none. Guilt or remorse. You have no guilt or remorse for your behavior. sexual promiscuity.
Yes, the FBI also reports that white males dominate in the sexual abusive uh categories of crime, callous disregard for the rights of others, unethical and antisocial behaviors, psychopathy is the most dangerous of all personality disorders, and Dr. Shock Matthews says it is inherent in whiteness.
All right. So, we're going to read this last part. Then we're going to stop because we're up to 43 minutes. This research, and I'm going to go back to this tomorrow, the next day. All right.
The research calculates that between the birth and age of 20, sociopath personality fully develops and becomes hardwired and unable to be altered.
When confronted with the psychopathy of whiteness, black folks and people of color have only two choices. According to vers 2011, attack or elillude. That is the only choice we have when we're faced with this psycho psychopathic behavior. as they have done as they have done both meaning black folks and to their children shadrin have been met with centuries of violence even though we attacked or elude from this mis from this anti-misogenation to child slavery to lynching to police brutality one more time according to ver stappen 2011 attack or elude when you are confronted with these psychopathic behaviors of whiteness as they have done meaning black people have done and to the shrine have been met with curious centuries of violence and anti-misogenation to child slavery to lynching to police brutality the mimemetically driven race technology of psychopathic whiteness has been de demonstrative throughout the history of America with an extreme lack of remorse and empathy for the egregious acts of violence against foundational black Americans. And with that folks, that 43 minutes we got going, I'm going to end my broadcast. We're going to pick it up tomorrow and finish off Dr. Shark's article with revealing some more things about whiteness and what it means for us. And with that, I'll say a and have a wonderful
Related Videos
She Taught Me What Most Americans Will Never Learn
JustinAlvo
259 views•2026-06-03
Native Americans in Pacific Northwest preserve salmon fishing tradition for future generations
CBSMornings
719 views•2026-05-30
Before Castles: Discovering Portugal’s Colossal Chalcolithic Stronghold
prehistoricportugal
184 views•2026-05-29
5 Mistakes Americans Make in Australia That Australian Spot Instantly
Auzura-i2e
159 views•2026-05-29
“Much Larger Than Any Man Back Home” — German POW Women Compared American Cowboys to German Men
ForgottenFronts-d6q
2K views•2026-06-01
Americans Losing Their Minds In Europe..
camkirkhambabyy
54K views•2026-05-29
Discover the survival and hunting methods of the Hadzabe tribe — Cooking in the wildest way
hadzapeopledocumentary
507 views•2026-05-28
ETHIOPIA — The Most Misunderstood Country In East Africa?
ZiAfreen
165 views•2026-05-31











