22.07.2026 | Court No. 5

[00:00:08]May I uh I beg to mention item number 25 the conducting council H Lampu he couldn't make it due to some personal difficulty the consent has been taken from the other opposite side kindly list this matter on 25 >> 17th of August if possible.

[00:00:35]>> Mr. >> Mu >> L council submit that the conducting council Mr. H. Dampu is out of station. Therefore he pressed for adjournment on the matter for the day. He has also obtained instruction obtain consent from the L council for the respondent.

[00:00:59]The L council further request that on the consent of the parties the matter may be listed on 17th August. The prayer is all beasted accordingly on 17th August. Okay guys my lord. My lord item number 26. My lord this matter may be uh kindly fixed after 3 weeks. My lord, I have taken >> my lord the council uh appearing on behalf of petitioner is absent my lord due to some problem I have taken the uh consent from other parties also >> miss learning council sist the conducting council Mr. Ketama is has some personal difficulties today. Therefore, pray for adjournment of the matter over the he has also obtained consent from the other side has prayed for common list this matter after 3 weeks.

[00:01:47]>> There is an in which may be continued.

[00:01:49]>> The interim order passed earlier said continue till the next state of listing.

[00:01:56]I like to mention item number eight here in the leading due to personal difficulty he could not appear therefore the matter may be taken up after one week is paid for by Mr. M come J council appearing on behalf of the learn council for the petitioner list this matter after a week. Okay.

[00:02:29]>> Uh lordship I mention item number 10 and 12 on behalf of the respondent. The matter may be fixed on 29th July.

[00:02:38]>> 10 and >> 10 and 12. Why 11 not 11 10 >> 10 and 11 >> 12 also from admission for this matter [clears throat] connected matter >> okay criminal petition questioned connected contact okay a contested Yes.

[00:03:11]>> Okay. Miss >> uh it may be 29.

[00:03:16]>> It's a criminal. We can >> 29th July >> is in the admission only. You want this m >> whether the record has been called for received >> record is there.

[00:03:31]Okay.

[00:03:42]heard miss the petitioners also heard Mr. Tapak I mean Mr. Tapak council appearing on behalf of the respondent.

[00:04:02]The trial code has also been received.

[00:04:06]This is called for has also been received. Staff since the parties have present and the records has also been received. The matter this criminal petition is admitted for hearing stuff. Please pray for kama this matter up. Oh for hearing after two weeks.

[00:04:27]>> 29th July.

[00:04:28]>> 29th July.

[00:04:29]>> Yes.

[00:04:34]>> Okay. Spread for commis on 29th July for hearing. Okay.

[00:04:39]>> Deeply obliged.

[00:04:43]>> Is there any interim there? No.

[00:04:48]>> I beg to mention item number 14. on behalf of a body.

[00:04:52]>> The standing council is out of >> item number 14. The standing council is out of station on medical grounds. So >> just a minute. Huh?

[00:05:00]>> Yes.

[00:05:02]So the matters and fix >> in the earlier matter the interim order pass earlier shall continue till the next day of >> Yes. This is item >> item number 14. 14.

[00:05:15]>> Yes sir. The standing council is out of station on medical ground so the matters were to the fix after two weeks.

[00:05:24]Mr. Aurora L council summit said the conducting council is out of station. Therefore pray for adjournment of the matter to which the PP appearing on behalf of the state has no objection. Prayer allows Mr. Matter after a week. Two weeks.

[00:05:48]>> After two weeks. Yes.

[00:05:54]Item number one.

[00:05:58]Lordship. This is a case uh challenging the order dated of passed by the commercial suit in the Kohhati Cam Metro. I've been affected by the P 29 year. This is the case where there's a transaction between the parties whereby it has been categorically mentioned about the jurisdiction. May I read the 29 jurisdiction?

[00:06:20]>> Yes, it is only in the papar of the Bjhati High Court any other court. So what is happening honor? The transaction between the parties >> page 29 >> page 29 my lord >> this what is this >> is a agreement between the parties whereby any dispute arises it will be within the jurisdiction of this honorable court but unfortunately what is happening honor the opposite party the accused petitioner accused has filed one commercial suited the kam metro in the guhati high court under kam metro so my humble pray is that since there is a jurisdiction part there's a completely all the transaction all the dealing have been done between the parties in it. So how they can come to the court?

[00:07:00]>> You you are challenging the order.

[00:07:03]>> Order dated your lordship 64 days and order have been passed by the commercial suit of 46 2026 your lordship that I have mentioned in the copy of the order page 31 >> 31.

[00:07:14]>> Yes Lord.

[00:07:15]>> This was passed by >> passed by the civil just senior division >> senior division >> senior division number >> and then this petition is >> uh >> civil division >> civil division. how it lies here. Yeah, in the cost title I have mentioned your membership that we are challenging the order that that order uh commercial suite number 129 2006 20 division branch 2 whereby order have been passed next page my lord order next page page two >> okay >> order date 66 2026 whereby they have pass an order to maintain status quo that cannot be that cannot be done by the learned trial >> no no but whatever maybe but Since you are challenging the order passed by the civil senior division >> two >> to Assam >> Assam >> how the civil revision lies here >> before the bench >> because since your lordship all the juris in here >> maybe maybe but then >> since our my point is contention is that they have granted bail and this is the certified copy I have procured without the leave of this honorable They cannot go anywhere. This is the order.

[00:08:28]>> But then whatever maybe but they have gone >> that is >> rightly or wrongly they have already filed the petition before is there >> in the commercial city in civil division.

[00:08:41]>> So it lies before the >> my humble pray that there is an order passed by this honorable court.

[00:08:45]>> Appeal should lie before the high court.

[00:08:47]>> Lord this is at >> lordship. My humble prayers that they >> and you have filed this revision >> revision for passing or transfer the order to the >> what is this? This is the order where they have been cooperate the investing officer and then that part last >> maybe maybe but we are not concerned with this but then this order was passed by >> the civil judge >> that order have been passed >> whether revision lies I have no idea but then if there is appeal lies before >> my lord we have filed 227 >> 227 whatever may be any other article or any other section how the >> jurisdiction >> only The Assam court order passed by the Assam night before the High Court of Arunachal Pradesh >> Lord since we here for the dealing we will pay 22 your lordship if permit me council believe please. Yes. Yes. Order was passed by the court in Assam only.

[00:09:44]Lordship that is I >> any appeal wherever may be it lies before the courtyam >> since I >> not before the Aronachal >> lordship my only contention is that that since the board of parties have been consigned page 29 my lord >> and then it appears that you have been you have prayed for transfer also >> transfer and also >> provision transfer transfer of the case from one state to another >> lordship I just >> under which provision 25 APC >> lordship my >> it will be that will by dealt with by the supreme court >> lordship >> not even the high court gui high court also >> the 227 uh >> how can it be transferred automatically >> lordship only I I I understand that it can be only >> without transferring the case you have file this and then you are also praying for transfer no you have to satisfy the court by uh which provision Lord my humble prayer before this honorable court since the judication is although it is in another court and that another >> you satisfy how it lies before this court >> lordship my satisfy before this honorable >> so the provision so the provision just read it once >> only provision is that when there is another court and this is another court although it is of the guati high court itself my humble prayer before this honorable let the issue may be notice if lord how the notice can be issued to Assam.

[00:11:14]>> Point is that >> order was passed by the Assam court. How >> what this court have?

[00:11:20]>> Since I under civil section >> no just you satisfy the provision. So is just a pro the provision under which you have come and how it lies before this court >> not tomorrow I will satisfy your position if >> I don't think although it is one court to another court to the Supreme Court that we also understand but issue >> kindly see kindly see >> CPC I give birth please to transfer the commercial suit from civil judge senior division to district gui division upr.

[00:12:18]Now count to 25 the power of Supreme Court to transfer the suits >> on the application of a party after notice of the parties and after hearing of the s of the them as desired to be heard. The Supreme Court may at a stage if satisfied that an order under this section expedent for the ends of justice direct that any suits appeal or other proceeding be transferred from high court from a high court or other civil court in one state to high court or other civil court in another state.

[00:12:58]>> It's a clear clear provision. It is a clear provision but but we issue that from one state to another >> ought to be from the Supreme Court is the legally made it that we do understand but see the uh because >> the order was passed by the civil judge senior division >> two >> two so it lies before the high court if you want to challenge >> appealate court there >> the appellet court is Assam only. Okay.

[00:13:30]I think the what order this order what lies >> this >> revision or the appeal lies against the order impure order. It will probably appeal >> appeal appeal >> appeal would be will be before the high court at Guati only >> you better instead of getting it dismissed better withdraw rethink and file before the appropriate court >> that will be better I may be allowed to liberty with liberty to file a lawyer >> Mr. Dr. B and Google B and Google learn council for the petitioner.

[00:14:16]Oh, Mr. Bogle learning council for the petitioner press that he may be allowed to withdraw this civil revision petition with liberty to file appropriate application before the appropriate court.

[00:14:34]having jurisdiction. Okay. The player is allowed. This CRP is dismissed as withdrawn.

[00:14:43]Order number two.

[00:14:48]With liberty with liberty.

[00:14:59]Lo. Uh this is a val application under section under 483 of BNSS. Uh praying for release of the accused personal val in connection with cyber crime PS case number 22 of 2025 registered under section so and so uh lordship. uh the information had loden a fire on dated 078 2025 regarding the online job fraud and the financial scam via telegram uh group for the loss of rupees three lakhs 65,500 so and accordingly a case was registered as a cyber crime police case number 22 of 2025 and registered under section so and so lordship uh fire uh copy of fire ded 07 7 uh 08 is annex in an extra number two page number uh 16 >> lordship during the course of investigation al accuse was accordingly arrested on 2804 2026 by the cyber crime police who is the assistant of the police station business chirang district Assam since person has been >> where the complaint >> sorry losses Where is the content of the complaint? F >> F uh F in Lord phase number 16.

[00:16:25]>> Read read page number 16.

[00:16:30]>> Uh kindly read >> uh come to the phase number 21 type of lordship.

[00:16:37]Uh uh lordship complaint regarding the >> or what >> uh lordship it's fire lordship >> where is the fire >> no content of the complaint filed by the inform page number 17 >> 17 is what >> where is the content the fire lo by the complainant inform not exhip not annexed.

[00:17:18]>> Why you are behaving as if you do not know what I'm asking?

[00:17:40]Uh lordship uh during the court of course of the investigation uh was accordingly arrested on 284 2026 by cyber crime police station itangar with the assistant of police station business chang district Assam just minutes just a minute council That it's very long.

[00:18:04]It's a petition or what?

[00:18:07]>> It's a bell application.

[00:18:13]>> What is allegation against you?

[00:18:15]>> Uh allegation is like a uh job fraud and financial scam scam by a telegram group.

[00:18:22]>> Okay. Job fraud. What did you do >> as per the allegation? Uh lordship uh during the investigation uh all the all the article has been seized lordship >> what article >> uh like five notes of the first loop uh three sim card and 13 not of a team card of business bank we are seized by the investigation from you >> so you >> from you >> yes lordship >> okay >> so my humble lord >> when this fire was losed on 7 8 20 25 plus >> 25.

[00:18:59]Okay.

[00:19:03]>> So, you were arrested on >> uh I was arrested on the law uh uh 07 uh >> 25.

[00:19:15]>> Yes. Uh 28 04 20 26 >> 26.

[00:19:18]>> Yes. Lordship.

[00:19:19]>> Okay.

[00:19:20]>> Uh lordship even uh uh I had filed a bail application number 133 of 2022 before the honor learn district and session just >> what happened there?

[00:19:32]>> Uh the bill was rejected. Lord >> on what ground?

[00:19:35]>> Uh the support of the bail application we are not duly considered for that bill was reject rejected.

[00:19:47]>> Mhm. the some supporting documents and some consider uh application we are not dy considered for that uh bill was rejected or on 0407 2026 copy of order that 0407 is NX in NXR 5 P number of 35 >> okay the court found that the primary fac against you rampant online fraud >> yes First.

[00:20:29]So what is the new ground you have taken this time?

[00:20:32]Uh [clears throat] because it was rejected.

[00:20:37]What changes has taken place thereafter?

[00:20:42]Sir my ground is uh all the search and certain article has been seized lord sir all the no that time also it was seized only after seized >> yes lord sir >> those things were seized the court found that those were seized and there is a problem facing case against you >> yes lordship uh I I am the father of the two two years old minor son who is suffering from the intermittent fever seizure attack and the required consent care Uh [clears throat] Mhm.

[00:21:14]>> I am the father of the two years also on the lordship and uh >> and who is suffering from the intermittent fever and a seizure attack and required the consent care and a medical attention for that lordship and a copy of the prescription is in an extra port of page number 33.

[00:21:29]>> Who is the information complainant?

[00:21:38]Okay.

[00:21:44]Secret.

[00:21:49]>> Okay. So >> otherwise no changes. Yes. After rejection of the bail it'll be rejected only. But then we need to can we call for the record? Yes Lordship. Just to just to see if for That may not be the good ground your son. Everybody has a children.

[00:22:22]Okay. Mr. >> Tiligu council for the petition Mr. Lo PP public prosecutor for the state.

[00:22:37]Respondent start by filing this application under section 483 of the bargain access.

[00:23:03]The petitioner is seeking When the petitioner pays for grant of bail to the accuse, what is the name of the accused?

[00:23:24]What is Ajinur?

[00:23:27]Ain Islam who has been arrested.

[00:23:29]>> Yes sir. in connection with cyber crime PS case number 22 stroke 2025 under section 3192 3184 338 3363 340 2 31 then 3174 612 BNS read with section 66B of IT act call for issue notice call for since Mr. Employee accepted notice on behalf of the state respondent. No formal notice is required to be issued. Stop call for the scan copy of the phase diary. Stop list matter after a week.

[00:24:27]>> Next week ship.

[00:24:28]>> Okay. After a week if possible 27th July >> 27. Yes. One day it's not possible.

[00:24:38]Lordship Friday on Friday lordship >> 21 30 30 31 lordship >> 31 >> 30 is big lordship >> 29 yes lordship okay 29 okay as list matter again on 29th okay >> item number three >> yes ma'am this is bail application law >> the accused was arrested on 186 2026 law now it's been almost 34 days in fact bail was moved before the rest judge also lo that rejection bail of that order lo will find at least 22 where where is the fire >> uh declaration declaration that you have No criminal anticident or if there is any criminal case pending against you, have you revealed where is that statement?

[00:25:50]>> Statement has it been disclosed? Yes, there is a notification where whereby it says that you have to declare that there is no case or if there is case you have to disclose.

[00:26:09]If there is any case pending against you, you have to disclose.

[00:26:16]They have to incor incorporate that paragraph.

[00:26:19]>> Mhm. Because uh to my humble understanding my most of the oral knows the case pending against this accused person in Assam.

[00:26:26]>> Mhm.

[00:26:27]>> That is that is this present accused person >> present accused?

[00:26:31]>> Yes my >> I have no idea but then >> but we have seen in the media also my there is a person.

[00:26:37]>> Yes this person my so he need to be disclosed all those cases which are pending against him. Yes, that is correct. Lordship that that we are in withdraw it incorporate that paragraph. Yes, >> incorpor you want to incorporate >> lordship otherwise I'll uh file an amendment application >> incorporating that particular paragraph >> otherwise I'll withdraw and I'll refresh incorporating that particular I'll >> probably the detail of the case >> we have this >> that will be more appropriate minus because without my taking into consideration expect cannot That is the ground of rejection.

[00:27:20]>> Yes ma'am.

[00:27:21]>> So then better Mr. Jer for permission to Allah without his bail application with liberty to file a press after making necessary correction. The prayer is allowed. This bail application is dismissed is withdrawn with liberty is prayed for.

[00:27:52]Matter number four please in this matter this uh AB has come on transfer from the principal seat and in was granted on 177 2026 now >> there's interim >> yes there's an in because they we furnished the copy yesterday only I think CD would be required >> CD was called for No, it was not called no call for furnishing.

[00:28:22]>> We are furnishing the copy because it it had come on transfer from the principal.

[00:28:26]>> Okay.

[00:28:30]>> Inter up to >> it was transferable. CD was not called for >> after now CD CD would be required.

[00:28:37]>> He is to be called for.

[00:28:38]>> Yes. Is AB?

[00:28:40]>> Yes.

[00:28:41]>> You are protected by the inter.

[00:28:42]>> Yes ma'am.

[00:28:44]>> Okay.

[00:28:47]heard Mr. L senior council assisted by Mr. HS B council for the petitioner lordship in was up to 20 only lordship 20 >> yes lordship >> yes we have recorded a statement >> as per the direction honorable court because >> you appeared before the eye of the case >> yes yes >> whether you were formally arrested arrested by the IO on your appearance >> no that is false >> no we have given a statement because the matter is pending put the in model was there that's where >> okay >> so I would pray intimid this matter has been received from received on transfer from the principal bench at Guatu stock uh copy has been furnished to the land PP for the state Mr. Loy who acknowledge the receipt staff Mr. Lawyer Len publicator seek some time to produce the three of bunds case number 32 stock 2026 it's long list of section against you not against me actually I because of six and seven would be have a bearing this case would have a bearing on a six and seven item six Under section under section 112 31 65 3184 3192 3363 341 1 and two of the BNS 2023 start the prayer as not call for the scan copy of that case study start list matter again after a week. Yes.

[00:31:14]Stop. In the meantime, the interim order pass shall continue till the next booster. Okay. Much of what is this?

[00:31:28]>> Okay. This is bail order lordship. Okay.

[00:31:30]Bail order. It's there only.

[00:31:31]>> Yeah.

[00:31:34]Matter number five.

[00:31:36]>> May I please your lordship? I'm appearing through online VC lordship.

[00:31:39]will remember the the criminal revision that which was listed on 28 lit with regard to the bank Apex Bank and Eco Bank. Uh we have moved in criminal petition on 27 lordship with regard to the same f lordship that no interim was granted to the petitioner lordship has observed to file an bail application with regard to appearing before the io lordship lord will remember on 20 on day before lordship lord will come to the at page 16 >> the part would be at page 19 memory it will Page 19 would be the FI which can be read.

[00:32:21]>> What was the allegation? What was the allegation?

[00:32:22]>> Allegation was that Apex Bank as a consumer had kept an FDR with the eco bank >> and that that was prematurely closed in 2020 when the petitioner was a manager.

[00:32:34]You >> I was the manager. I was the manager Lord said. So now the gur >> only only because I'm the manager. They have Yeah. will appear before the I logic will give us two weeks time in between and maybe protected by the interim model.

[00:32:50]>> Yes, Mr. Lord Mister name is why your name register with the portal. I think it is with regard to the portal not registration.

[00:33:04]>> Okay. Mr. Da for the petitioner.

[00:33:13]also had Mr. Lo BP for the state respondent P.

[00:33:21][clears throat] This application under section 482 of the bay sura sanita 2023 has been filed by the accused petitioner paying for grant of pre-arrest bill apprehending arrest in connection with vitanagar PS case number 131 stock 2026 under section 409 420p of Indian Penal Code 1860 this IPC.

[00:34:08]>> Yes. Because 20 because 2020 it was registered in 2026 but offenses of 2020 >> because allegation of premature closure of the allegation of premature closure of the FDR where of 2020 lordship when the BNS was not in vogue lordship at that point of time because >> in 20 was lo 26 26 only. Yes Lord. But they have written it.

[00:34:35]>> It should be IPC.

[00:34:39]>> Why? It should be IPC.

[00:34:42]They have restarted under >> some errors in the year 2019.

[00:34:45]>> Maybe. But then now it there is no provision in BNSF enabling >> to register the register the offense committed by the accused.

[00:35:03]H yes this is set settled by lordship our highot only lordship in k no if proceeding proceeding started proceeding noted started now the f was filed this year only yes >> yes h could have registered under bns Lordship since coach of action was aros in the 2020 prior to the coming of the lordship. This BNS maybe If it was a fraud, there is a section for fraud.

[00:36:00]If uh this is under 409 >> 409 by an public servant >> 420 the cheating then there is a provision there is a section for cheating also conspiracy also there is a section now under BNF also okay anyway like there is no oblent okay Stop but your application is under section >> 482 BNS because we have 482. Yes. Okay.

[00:36:46]>> So we filing.

[00:36:47]>> Now can we Yeah. Now why don't you say that since the offense was committed there this should also be under 438 >> that might not be long it has been settled by our court.

[00:37:01]>> Mhm.

[00:37:03]>> Offense is committed prior. No, if the procedure if the the pro proceeding started that will continue that will continue but offense is committed substantive law provisions are subentive in nature that will not have the retrospective will have a proective effect now allegation has come now only >> yes but now there is a pro there is a provision 120 the BNS also there 120 for 120 but uh so far as it cover it in that way.

[00:37:35]>> Yes. The judgment rendered by our own high court on that expect my lord will remember that my lord has settled one one matter and later on that was doubted by the coordinate bench it was referred to the larger bench >> where in my lord it was held that if the my alabat high court judgment was agreed by our division bench where in my lord it was held that if the offense is committed prior to the coming into force of the this bns or that then it will be governed by the substantive law would be IPC But the if it is filed prior to the coming into after the coming into ports of the court this BNSS and BNS >> then the procedure law would be BNSS but the offense will be IP offense >> but if it is continuing offense even after coming into court then BNS >> this offense was committed prior to >> the coming into my BNS.

[00:38:27]>> Okay. If it is continuing one then BNS if not continued then BNS IPC only settled in the state of state of oral protest reported in 2024 GT 756 m here the matter was decided the allegation is of 2020. Yes Lord.

[00:38:51]>> But then it appears that thereafter also it continued a request made on 2035 only.

[00:38:57]>> He came to know on 2025 L.

[00:39:00]>> Okay.

[00:39:01]>> The offense the offense >> is offensive. Yes Lord. That is what even eco bank said the FDR was prematurely closed in 2020. Lord it's dispute between two banks. Lord with regard to the money.

[00:39:15]Okay. So what we can do is call for the case >> and protect us in between and we'll come and appear logistic.

[00:39:24]>> So what is your submission? We said you what is your submission here in regarding allegation?

[00:39:34]Lord, uh the issue with regard to the allegation is that Apex Bank as a consumer had kept some money with the eco bank under fixed deposit which was prematurely closed when I was the bank manager and the bank manager only verifies the transaction lordship and the FIR itself says the FIR was filed because the AEX bank had approached the eco bank for giving them the money which will be the amount matured amount in 87 2025 when they came for closure of the FDR but eco bank did not pay saying like we'll pay after the internal investigation would be completed. Now the eco bank internally investigates and finds no criminality but some misconduct with regard to the petitioner. So my humble submission is lar issue is only civil nature between the aex bank and the eco bank and being a manager petitioner the council for the petitioner sat just minutes. Yes Lord.

[00:40:30]>> The case of the petitioner is that based on the written FIR loed by one Sri R. Gambo the manager of AEX bank nearly branch.

[00:40:45]The above mentioned police station case has been registered and since the register however we summit that the petitioner is innocent of the allegation made in the state a fire and if at all there is any the who observed that this is a misconduct Eco bank my employer has state that is also NX lordship by way of by way of what by way of what >> by way of lordship lord will find okay father said a preliminary inquiry was conducted by the eco bank >> yes lord my >> eco bank yes lord >> eco bank wherein it was observed that the mistake committed by the accused applicant was a misconduct which is of a civil nature. Stop the learning council for the petition for the semester. Since the accused applicant is a named accusing the FIRE, he has a reasonable apprehension that he may be arrested in connection with the FCPS case. Hence this application stop this notice called for the scan copy of the case study. Stop. Huh?

[00:42:31]Pending production of the case. It is provided that the in that in the event of the accused applicant so what is his name?

[00:42:42]>> Ronald [clears throat] Das.

[00:42:46]Ronovas is arrested in connection with the Nitanagar PS case number 131 2026 under section 409420B of Indian Penal Code.

[00:43:05]Karma shall be released on interim anticipatory bail on execution of a bail bone of rupees one with one shortity of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority subject to the following conditions start same condition okay that the cues that we shall appear before the eye of the case within 10 days from to be dislodged and give his statement that he shall coop next time that he shall cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the eye of the case as well when called for next that we shall not directly or indirectly influence strength or a threat to the witness of the case in any witness of the case.

[00:44:12]Next, that we shall not temper or temper with the evidence of the case in any manner. Next, that we shall not leave the state of Arunachal Pradesh without prior permission from the I of the case.

[00:44:25]Lord he's serving in Guadi in a eco bank in a branch lordship so that >> you informed [clears throat] the inform >> with the information to the IO not the permission he may not grant us a permission l >> with the information to the >> without private information to the high of the case >> yes lord highly obliged >> list his matter after two weeks highly highly obliged lordship number Six >> m this is anticip which is uh similar to the item number four just I mentioned when entry order was passed your lordship has pointed out so >> item item four >> yes m in this case my lordship has seen so many sections have been mad insert BNS sections have been inserted Mal but this is against the principal accused person who bortoi malot and his wife this is item six is similar to four >> yes >> what order was passed in four >> in four entry order was passed in other cases in the without issuing notice even pass at guati yes in the vacation bas No vacation bench of which vacation?

[00:45:57]>> This vacation?

[00:45:57]>> Yes. This vacation there >> vacation code here also >> it was passed at Guate.

[00:46:06]>> Yes.

[00:46:06]>> Yes.

[00:46:08]In some other cases without issuing notice even entry order was granted m.

[00:46:15]>> Okay. Someone has mur can can you guess >> taken my file? [laughter] >> Have you annexed order?

[00:46:25]>> No, I have the copy.

[00:46:28]>> It's a long complaint.

[00:46:30]>> Yes sir. It's a kind of petition.

[00:46:32]>> This is a kind of petition only.

[00:46:39]>> This more or less like civil petition.

[00:46:41]Yes. Lot money kind of almost.

[00:46:46]illogical see the empire.

[00:46:49]>> Yes, it's allegations.

[00:46:51]>> What is your role? What is the allegation? Otherwise, >> now there's no allegation against me as such.

[00:46:56]>> No. What is the basic allegation against accused person here?

[00:46:59]>> The allegation is a very ser serious matter.

[00:47:01]>> Okay. Like >> he has impersonated and cheated more than 30 crores.

[00:47:07]>> The main accused.

[00:47:08]>> Yes. And he his wife >> by way of what?

[00:47:11]>> Personating that he has connection with the Assam chief minister.

[00:47:14]>> Okay. he can have a partnership with him to open a the distillery that kind of thing.

[00:47:25]>> Okay. Okay.

[00:47:25]>> Alcohol production factory setting up factory in Assam and by that uh he has managed to almost uh secured 34 crores in his account.

[00:47:38]>> Oh. So from how many people?

[00:47:41]>> No, one one person who is >> one person could pay 34 cr. Yes, he should be asked.

[00:47:47]>> He's the one very big born owner in Banda oral side.

[00:47:55]>> He's running the distillery and all over.

[00:47:59]>> Okay.

[00:48:00]>> So that is the allegation. Now my part is the in this case is this I'm the one of the organization satra your lordship would be aware the bhana and all that in Assam lordship will see it's kind of monastery they organize bhana and all that lacks and lacks of money goes to that by donation of people okay >> he is one of the person who donated and I organized that event for that only m I have been implicated in this one otherwise I didn't >> otherwise you are not connected not at Not >> for the purpose of >> no that's why in order was granted by >> was granted to whom >> to other accused person who >> other accused also not connected otherwise >> no no that's why >> who who otherwise is connected >> the principal that Rishi Rishi Boro and his wife >> okay >> they had he's not before us >> no no no he has already been granted bail by the trial courtman both of them >> okay >> yes You have the copy of those?

[00:49:02]>> Yes. Yes.

[00:49:06]>> On board seven.

[00:49:15]I just even though on the technical ground but these were the principal me. But this is also before by the judicial magistrate. Yes.

[00:49:42]Otherwise there's no any allegations against me. No. He was arrested.

[00:49:47]>> Yes.

[00:49:50]Husband and wife they were arrested.

[00:49:53]>> So this is regular bail only.

[00:49:55]>> Yes. But then yours is >> anticipated.

[00:49:58]Difference >> they were already arrested. It's not on >> no not >> what I'm submitting is the all the allegations sections and all >> suddenly they must have been released only after the interrogation thorough interrogation of the case.

[00:50:13]>> Yes. But then in your case of my apprehensions but I may also be arrested. I need the protection. I'm ready to appear before the IO because there otherwise >> in such a huge in the in a case where huge amount is involved you may also be required to be interrogated. Definitely may I I will appear before the allegations is not against me against this person. If lordship sees the aire mal your name is there otherwise no >> yes lordship >> your name is there where yes where do I >> that's the only mother apprehend >> my name is there >> yes my name is there that's why I'm the apprehension otherwise if you lship see the the petition I will say not apparent there's not a single allegation against me >> then mistakenly name has come >> no what he did he might name allry I don't know whoever is connected or employment or >> where do we find your name in the copy of >> the page page 20 >> page 20 >> five fifth line right hand corner >> okay >> ice and cold storage >> that is different Okay. Your is only name >> only >> without any designation.

[00:51:42]>> No.

[00:51:52]Lord ship is if lash reads the entire affair there's not a single allegations against me >> now who are you otherwise here in the organization in this >> I am state in maji I'm connected with the satra which is a monastery of Indian as tradition kind of monastery where I organize bhana and all that and he has donated amount for that that's why I'm connected in that or say accomplice.

[00:52:24]>> No, no, I'm not even accomplished. His wife is the accomplice.

[00:52:31]>> Where do we find his wife's name?

[00:52:34]>> You will see >> the man accused name is >> Rishi Boro.

[00:52:39]>> Okay. He is accused.

[00:52:40]>> Yes. And >> wife is Mala.

[00:52:42]>> Yes. Page 21 you will see above name accused person namely Rishi Boruk Kotoki and Sri Mala. Bot husband and wife presidents of such and such all the allegations are against them we'll see >> their non accomplice being massi bikate lordship page 21 sec second >> the name accused person named Boro and Mala Boro are husband and wife residents of such and such juris Such who in furtherance of a deliberate premeditated and well orchestrated criminal contra along with other accused persons as named above have cheated and defrauded >> along with along with name.

[00:53:30]>> But nobody if she sees the other paragraph nobody has approached this only two persons have approached and entire amount was deposited in the bank account of Rishi Raj Borut.

[00:53:43]>> You you obtain instructions on that.

[00:53:45]Yes, lordship yesterday I talk with the OC as well as I lordship >> in the item number four also after obtaining the interim bail they appeared but they didn't produce the necessary document also lordship here also here the IO objected the lordship lordship >> objected the granting of inre lordship since uh since I received the communication from the go so what we'll do Uh that has been fixed on item four has been fixed on after a week.

[00:54:21]>> After a week you obtain instruction.

[00:54:25]>> Till then protection may be given in logic will see just in another case I have given a copy in that even before even without issuing notice the bail was granted permanent.

[00:54:43]named he was also name accused >> so that according to you is not a good order >> no I'm seeking similar if lordship is not wouldn't be I know wouldn't making it absolute but at least it should have a parity kind of intim at least till the case that is comes m Poet senior council assist is said by Mr. HS >> same okay also had Mr. Lo for the state.

[00:55:45]The applicant filed this petition under section 482 of the BNSS 2023 praying for grant of rearrest bill apprehending arrest in connection with bandwags case number 32 stroke 2026 under section 112 stroke 316 5 3184 31 92 33 363 3 4 1 1 2 Huh. one uh bracket bracket close to bracket of stop.

[00:56:53]The case of the petitioner is that an written a fire was lodged on 52 2026.

[00:57:02]52. Yes. 2026 before the banda police station by one Rajes Agarwal 56 to 26 men.

[00:57:23]52 56 >> 56 26 okay by one Sri Rajes Agarwal >> yes >> aling in tri India that's one Sri Rishi Bottoi Kama his wife Sri Mala Borgoi along with few others have connived and cheated the compliment.

[00:57:55]They cheated the informant of several kores of rupees.

[00:58:18]Stop.

[00:58:37]The prime accusi approach approached the informment with business proposal to establish an extra neutral alcohol unit. including the acquisition of land.

[00:59:06]Comma procurement of plant and machinery.

[00:59:14]Comma meeting other infrastructural and operational requirement as a joint venture.

[00:59:32]Stop.

[00:59:42]The proposal was made in the year 2021 and the prime accuse three receeded himself to be a close acquaintance acquaintance of the the present chief minister.

[01:00:14]>> Yes ma'am.

[01:00:15]>> The honorable chief minister >> even they had a photograph with him.

[01:00:18]>> Honorable chief minister of Assam and thereby projected his ability to facilitate and secure government support in establishing the project being introduced by such force representation of the accused persons.

[01:00:55]Accordingly, the informment transferred huge amount of money in favor of the elused person.

[01:01:11]However, nothing has been done.

[01:01:34]The learning council put a petition sub there's no allegation no specific allegation against the present accused person.

[01:01:46]The present accused sorry sum is that the present accused person is innocent of innocent of the allegations made in the state of fire and there is no specific allegation made against the present accused person.

[01:02:02]However, since he has been named in the fire, the accus append that we may also be arrested in connection with the foret police station to hence this application starts notice called for the scan copy of the case study startup since Mr. Loy Loy accepted lawy accepted notice on behalf of the state respondent. No formal notice is required to be issued.

[01:02:45]Stop pass this matter.

[01:02:50]It is subitted that the similar case uh bail application has been fixed on or >> after a week it was >> after two weeks after a week it was fixed >> after a week therefore no item four see yes item four this matter may also be le along with the item four huh item four write the number okay stop list it accordingly Okay.

[01:03:21]>> Yes.

[01:03:21]>> In the in the meantime.

[01:03:29]Oh one more par small paragraph before that nouns for the petition are missed in the similar in this situated the co accused person including the man accused rishi bot rishi raj bust busta Botto.

[01:04:02]>> Yes. And his wife >> and his wife Mala >> Botto and was has already been released on bail and Sri Tapasi Kumar Prasad is the is also accused.

[01:04:23]>> Yes ma'am. Name accused.

[01:04:26]>> Okay. The name accused in the above efforts at PSKS has also been granted arrest bail.

[01:04:38]Therefore he prays for the parity grant of respon parity. Huh? Stop. Okay then come back.

[01:04:58]In the meantime, pending production of the case study, it is provided that the in the that in the event of arrest of the case petitioners we shall be released on in anticipated bail on execution of a bail backbone of one is simply >> 50,000 he was there.

[01:05:31]>> Yes.

[01:05:31]>> 50,000 others. Yes. It was 50,000.

[01:05:35]>> 50,000.

[01:05:36]>> Yes.

[01:05:37]>> So it was made absolute in case of tapas. 50.

[01:05:41]>> In case of tapas, >> it's 50,000.

[01:05:44]>> Yes.

[01:05:45]>> Okay.

[01:05:49]With two shic of like amount. One of which shall be a resident of >> state of Arunachal Pradesh.

[01:05:59]>> This is by the arrest authority >> arresting authority.

[01:06:04]>> Okay.

[01:06:06]Subject to the condition same condition which put in it four. Okay.

[01:06:13]>> My objection may be recorded. My objection.

[01:06:17]Okay. says after after getting after getting anticip in my case not till the next date. Huh?

[01:06:28]>> Make it till the next date. Yes. Okay.

[01:06:32]>> Then the condition will be said is item four. Okay.

[01:06:37]Okay.

[01:06:38]>> Item six seven.

[01:06:40]He is an employee of the main accused person. He is given salary and all that.

[01:06:45]If that is accounted as an accused man, nobody can murder be left >> item seven month.

[01:06:52]>> I didn't realize that I he's an employee of that main accused person.

[01:06:57]>> So where he is also name accused?

[01:07:00]>> Yes. Where his name is?

[01:07:03]>> He is in lo page 20 m.

[01:07:11]>> I didn't realize that you will be will be asking for similar order. Sanjip in >> this was yes >> uh this is Sanjep >> earlier one was Viki duta >> yes >> now the main was bori second is mala this was Biki and then what was the other one who who was granted bail by the guati high court tapas >> tapas his name is also there >> yes ma'am >> tapas what is the present name is Sanji Basha.

[01:07:45]>> Sanji Basha.

[01:07:46]>> Yes.

[01:07:48]>> Where do we find page 20?

[01:07:52]>> Tapus seventh line.

[01:07:55]>> Sanji.

[01:07:56]>> Yes.

[01:07:56]>> Okay. Old name.

[01:07:58]>> Yes. Tapas and Sanjib was similar. They were employees of the many.

[01:08:04]>> Tapas and Sanj.

[01:08:05]>> Yes. In case of tapas was in B was made absolute.

[01:08:11]>> Tapas. Yes.

[01:08:13]>> Made absolute.

[01:08:14]>> Yes. Made absolute.

[01:08:17]>> Okay. So this is >> Yes.

[01:08:20]>> Sanji. So it will go similarly.

[01:08:22]>> Yes.

[01:08:24]>> Uh same order. Vice also same order.

[01:08:28]Okay.

[01:08:30]>> Lo me local would.

[01:08:33]>> No no no. You have a capacity. You have a connection with person.

[01:08:38]And this is item >> seven.

[01:08:42]>> Whatever this or six is seven. Okay.

[01:08:46]>> Much of >> item number nine.

[01:09:00]>> Yes. Mr. is for uh compounding >> compounding of non-compoundable the petitioner is about 100 in >> okay >> we have arrived at the settlement >> so the party since the m there is a two sections of law >> the husband has been certed on the complaint of the wife >> okay >> and what What was the complaint? Next is uh >> allegation >> allegation is other section 498 >> 498 >> 280 and uh 325 yeah 325 and 325 is compoundable 25 that is a compoundable net so they have compounded only the section 498 is non compoundable when the of uh uh yesterday matter was uh have together we have filed and settled a matter at the time of >> it was already charged.

[01:10:13]>> Yeah. See >> when the allegation was made when the incident took place >> very old 2020 20 >> 18 what is the status of the parties now we are together?

[01:10:29]Yeah.

[01:10:32]>> Having children.

[01:10:34]Where do we find?

[01:11:02]Where where is the fire Mr. Tapa? Uh fire is the Lord P number 17.

[01:11:08]>> Okay.

[01:11:09]>> And 18 is the ordinary as for the affair with I would like information. I see to the effect my husband. Oh, he used he used the pistol also >> mental >> but not registered under arms. I think I hope >> no no no because allegation know that he has been beaten with repres.

[01:11:47]So lots of uh finally we have uh the matter is m 600 before the JFC charge already framed. No, on 13th May 2026 m was matter was there for CC and again then uh matter was received on 8th 8th of July 2026 and today again matter is fixed for CC.

[01:12:19]>> What happened on 8th?

[01:12:21]>> 8 no C is spread.

[01:12:23]>> Okay. Today it is fixed >> today six for CC >> today.

[01:12:28]>> Yes.

[01:12:30]So as for the Lakmaran case uh it's a Lakmaran case uh >> is that case of 2018 why you were waiting till today when the case case is fixed before the trial court >> it was not brought in the court uh it was although it was seated but court has not tried that recently lots of matter has been uh brought into the court and trial has been uh received ated in this case this this is a settle law when there is a matter only the 49 section starting >> just a minute what is the terms >> of the settlement >> kindly okay >> where do we find >> that the the wife and husband are living together with the children now >> we can see go by the paragraph 10 12 >> paragraph 10 No in the agreement.

[01:13:30]>> Yes, agreement copy as well as in the petition.

[01:13:34]Kindly see the agreement. Agreement copy is in the par 32 31 32 >> where do we find regarding the family living together with children where 32 May I read number one in government at white and highly regret for his mistake after having mediator and consultation after the incident and the incident impulsive without without any criminal intention out of anger. However both the both the parties have settled the case and receive custom for the interest of the father. Uh par two although the case has been searched against the first party by the police under various of law the court to search against the accused person. Uh third both the parties have entered in settlement of criminal case because they do not want to continue to leave any.

[01:14:49]>> Okay. Okay. not yet settle fully.

[01:14:50]>> Yes, settle.

[01:14:54][laughter] >> Okay.

[01:14:57]>> Settle Mr. T. So >> yes, family matter.

[01:15:04]>> Okay.

[01:15:05]>> So Mr. L council for the petition also had Mr. L before the state Mr. Pa The present petition under 528 of the BNSS 2023 has been fi jointly filed by the accused and the informment praying for washing of the GR's number 49, 2018 arising out of EW P and WPS case number 61 2018 under section 498 capital A within bracket 4 stroke 323 of IPC pending before the which code you said uh JFC >> judicial magistrate first class EPR So many >> the petitioner number one is the accused husband >> husband and the petitioner number two the wife >> is the informment in five in the above women PSKS number 61 2018 stop the case leading to the filing of this criminal petition they use that the petitioner number two wife launched written a fire against her as husband bracket petitioner number two alleging that alleging for mental and physical torture against uh no records against uh come the police has registered the aforementioned police station case and staff upon completion of investigation the Police has submitted charge seat against the petitioner number one for the for offense under offense punishable under section 498A.

[01:18:22]stock 3 325 IP and now the case is pending trial before the n court of judicial magistrate first class up st it is submitted in the Lancaster summits that during the pendency of the tribe, the parties being husband and wife has amicably settled and resolved the amicably resolved the dispute and also settle. Now reducing into writing by settlement date 27 2026 stop.

[01:19:32]In the settlement date come the the it is stated that the petitioner number two wife has forgiven the petitioner number one. the accused husband, petitioner number one, and that the petitioner number the informant petitioner number two categorically stated that since the the matter has been settled, she has no further advance against the accused petitioner number one and that she does not want to pursue the matter any further.

[01:20:20]So rest of the chat. Okay.

[01:20:28]This person number 12.

[01:20:40]>> Yes.

[01:20:42]>> Take it. Yes, >> this is a criminal petition. Milo.

[01:20:50]>> Mhm.

[01:20:51]>> Was filed in 2025 and Milo was pleased to grant the inim protection my lord by want order at it 375.

[01:21:08]>> H okay. What is that? This is criminal petition.

[01:21:18]>> Passing of this particular basically this is a third but this is basically not against the petitioner. My will find in the there is no single allegation against the petitioner basically this pertains to the allegation against one bank manager who has reportedly issued a new certificate but the pro but the inve agency mad.

[01:21:47]What the >> sic involved?

[01:21:50]>> Yes madam.

[01:21:52]>> Is there other fellow?

[01:21:57]>> Okay, let him come. Let him be present.

[01:22:00]Okay.

[01:22:01]>> May please.

[01:22:04]>> Yes.

[01:22:05]>> You are in this case. Are you in this case?

[01:22:08]>> Yes. [clears throat] >> Yes.

[01:22:09]>> I appearing for respondent number two.

[01:22:12]>> For respondent number two. On the last question, I have entered my appearance.

[01:22:16]>> Okay.

[01:22:18]Oh, what is your submission otherwise?

[01:22:21]You have >> on the last uh not today because the you also directed the standing council of SIC to get some instructions.

[01:22:34]>> So he's not there >> and he was supposed to.

[01:22:35]>> So let us wait for some time.

[01:22:37]>> Let us wait for some time. He's in >> in the other court.

[01:22:41]>> He's on lake. So we'll have to wait for some time.

[01:22:44]>> Okay.

[01:22:45]>> Okay.

[01:22:45]>> Okay. Okay.

[01:22:50]Item number 13.

[01:22:58]Yes. Fellowship. This matter was fixed yesterday and instructed to fix today.

[01:23:02]Your worship.

[01:23:04]>> Item 13. Yes. Your worship.

[01:23:07]Where was that?

[01:23:10]Uh the record loss >> why it has been missed >> uh like as to the record.

[01:23:34]>> What was to be clarified today? Loif uh the yesterday lose has gone to the record as per the record loss there was uh no one was examined los and the lo as per the record uh they have approached the court to uh so that they have uh uh come before the high court to uh quashing the metal lawsuit that is reflected in the earlier order lawsuit >> they have >> they have approached the high court for quinging the metal lawsuit that is reflected in the earlier order and next that was fixed for uh yesterday law on 217 Seven >> explosive as per yesterday.

[01:24:12]>> Uh yesterday >> before the trial court.

[01:24:14]>> Yes. Lost it.

[01:24:15]>> What happened yesterday?

[01:24:16]>> Yesterday was that is uh no idea. Lost it.

[01:24:20]>> It was fixed before the trial court yesterday.

[01:24:22]>> Yes. Lost it.

[01:24:23]>> Do you have any idea?

[01:24:24]>> No.

[01:24:25]>> Oh L council. This is your case.

[01:24:30]Who appeared there before the trial court?

[01:24:34]don't know your oh and this I suppose is your case isn't it? Yes.

[01:24:44]You are praying for this pet the decision has been filed for your client.

[01:24:49]Same client who faced who is facing trial before the trial court yesterday appeared.

[01:24:57]Don't you think that it was your duty on your part or your duty to collect the information?

[01:25:04]I >> updated information regarding the proceeding of the case. Fellowship, I just had a conversation with the petitioner number one. Uh she told me that uh examination of the witness is not done. That was only information she provided.

[01:25:27]Just we'll take a break of some around 4 minutes. Okay.

[01:25:43]Yes. What was that?

[01:25:46]Uh matter was not fixed yesterday before CGM TUIP. Since there is a interim order that's which code it is pending CGM TUI.

[01:25:56]CGM TU.

[01:25:57]>> Yes. Yellowship for what?

[01:26:00]>> It is at evidence stage fellowship.

[01:26:02]>> Evidence stage.

[01:26:03]>> Yes. Yellowship.

[01:26:06]Which one is the last order? Have you?

[01:26:10]Is it in the 196 26?

[01:26:15]>> 196.

[01:26:23]>> This is for exemption.

[01:26:25]Where where you say that they have also praised before the court that They will file passing petition withdrawn from the case.

[01:26:50]You have any any objection?

[01:26:52]>> No sir. Because already in granted lawsuit and interim. Okay.

[01:26:57]>> And this is mim is also >> okay.

[01:27:01]there is inter why it is posted for today >> yesterday has come we have not go to the tisha so directed us to go to the tier >> also heard Miss Elhag Okay.

[01:27:30]Council for the land addition PP before the states. Okay.

[01:27:47]This is joint petition. Yes. There are three person. Who are these?

[01:27:52]Who is the >> uh petitioner two is the husband of the petitioner number one and petitioner number three is the brother-in-law lordship of the >> why brother-in-law is involved >> actually he he was the one who physically assaulted the petitioner number one as per allegation your >> h this brother >> brother-in-law assaulted >> assaulted the petitioner number one >> he is the wife >> wife of the his elder brother Yellowship >> petitioner number three He is the brother-in-law. Yes. So, younger brother of the husband. Yes.

[01:28:28]So, he permitted.

[01:28:36]Are they staying together now? No.

[01:28:37]Yellowship since 2020. They are separated. Okay.

[01:28:44]So, the because where do we find that in the agreement? Has it been reflected?

[01:28:54]They are not not staying together.

[01:28:58]Where have you stated that they are not staying together >> in paragraph seven in the agreement has it been reflected where when the agreement was entered into between the parties?

[01:29:17]Agreement were made on 24th June 2026.

[01:29:22]>> Okay. Then here whether here they have stated that they are separated now. Have they stated who engaged the council?

[01:29:40]Because they are separated now enemy because of the brother-in-law >> scholarship >> who engaged the council >> Yellowship petitioner number two Yellowship >> two then petitioner number one whether need to confirm from petitioner number one or is it okay land additional PP >> uh the situation it appears is little bit different >> I I had a conversation with petition at number one also >> one also >> yesip She she has signed the nama.

[01:30:16]Yes. The court need to confirm. Huh?

[01:30:19]Yes.

[01:30:21]>> What is her name?

[01:30:39]The case is registered under section file under which section?

[01:30:47]Section 354 498 A and 34 A of DNS >> 30 354 >> 498 A and 34 >> whether 354 is compoundable or non-compoundable >> non-compoundable >> 354 it's a compoundable loss 3 490 is non-compoundable and uh this is uh lossip as per the The charit loss the injury is also simple loss >> charit injury is simple >> simple but see only the thing is that we need to ensure because this situation is different they are not staying together since that >> yes >> the brother-in-law is involved it may so happen that she might not pardon the brother-in-law >> yes >> in the case if they have not sign in the baklad nama roship then he they may be 44 lawsuit.

[01:31:56]Supposing tomorrow if the wife comes, I have never signed.

[01:32:08]I just while calling for the record in such case should have actually confirmed you said somewhere I think in the uh trial code record reflected that they want to settle the matter is this in this case.

[01:32:28]Okay. Yes. Yes.

[01:32:46]Okay.

[01:32:50]The this petition under 5 to8 of Barbadas Anita has jointly filed by the informment and the accused in accused praying for passing.

[01:33:20]of the G of the G proceeding in GR case number 03 2021 arising out of women PS case number 02 2021 under section registered under section 354 498 A 34 IPC Stop. Then clarify. Let us clarify the particular part is the petitioner number one is the informment.

[01:34:07]Who was the wife of the petition number two?

[01:34:17]The petitioner number semicolon. The petitioner number two is the accused who was the husband of the petitioner number one informant and the petitioner number three is another accuse who is stated to be the brother-in-law of the informment stuff. H better the council for the petition sub sorry the case of the petitioner is that on Mr. One, where is the FIR?

[01:35:08]4 3 2021 a written FIR was lost by the petitioner number one alleging that alleging against the petitioner number one and two 4 impl okay or four causing physical assault on her without any reason based on the forced fire the above mentioned women peace case number 043 2021 was registered. No 02 huh 2021 was registered against the petition number two and three. Stop.

[01:36:13]After upon completion of investigation, the police has submitted charged against the petitioner number two and three for offense punishable under section the same mention of 498A and 354 498 and 34 IPC.

[01:36:47]Stop.

[01:36:58]Charge framed.

[01:37:00]Charge framed.

[01:37:01]>> No ship. Uh not yet. Posted.

[01:37:03]>> Okay. Now the case is pending before the chief judicial magistrate au the council that during the pendency of investigation stop try come the >> if it is ev evidence that then already charged fet submission lawsuit that is It is in apparent >> if it appearance then lossive charge has not been framed yet los >> I'm asking you >> los as yes as for the record loss I have seen lo is appearance stage only but he has submitted that is evidence stage Okay.

[01:38:29]fix for framing of chart then if it's not there.

[01:38:47]Okay. charge.

[01:38:49]The L chief judicial register said after taking cognition of the case has framed charge against against both the accused applicant accused petition number two and three for offense under section P22 Where is that order? Have you had not seen that crime or not?

[01:39:25]You were supposed to go through the record.

[01:39:33]That is why it takes time to go through the record.

[01:39:38]Unless the AP assist properly, it takes time.

[01:39:48]There is a record of primary but no order of priming charges is not available.

[01:39:58]It said against accusing against offense pitable under 6498 against petitioner number one uh for offense under section 498A. and against Vietnam. Okay. Petition number two for offense under section 323 IPC stop. Then come submitted that the L council for petition some mistakes given the pendency of this the investigation and the trial come the petitioner number one wife and the petitioner number two husband has already been separated.

[01:41:11]Stop. He further sist the dispute between the wife and husband has been amicably amicably settled and executed a mutual deed of settlement.

[01:41:34]Wherein the accused? Where in the informment where in the informant petitioner number one has categorically stated that since the matter since they have already been separated and the matter has already been matter has been settled she has no further advance against the accused petitioner number two and three and that she does not want to pursue with the matter any further.

[01:42:10]Okay.

[01:42:14]Okay.

[01:42:27]This is 13.

[01:42:32]It number 12. Passover matter.

[01:42:38]Yes.

[01:42:45]12.

[01:42:46]Okay. This this was 13. Okay.

[01:42:53]>> Yes. 12 is for >> my lord. Uh I'm extremely sorry my lord on the last occasion my lord I was directed to place on record the written instruction my I'm extremely sorry me I could not >> okay >> bring the record. What was this about?

[01:43:08]Otherwise written state written instruction regarding what?

[01:43:12]>> Yes. Uh meot in 2016 meal and FR was filed me.

[01:43:17]>> Mhm.

[01:43:18]>> Um alleging that there there was a misappropriation of 71 crores meal >> and subsequently in 2018 also FR was filed me.

[01:43:26]>> Okay. Okay. Since it was in the same matter meal but both the cases were mal and now meot this again in 2020 uh 24 and has been again filed now alleging that 19.

[01:43:47]So you are still a then uh the instruction is still awaited. Yes m only to clear extent whether the allegation which is made in this instant case pertains to the amount that >> earlier amount okay that was to be clarified >> yeah only that part >> mhm this is not a case of m >> yeah that is why we would like to confirm >> yes >> uh is for the FPC he was posted as administrator of the financial purchase AEX Bank priority aex bank limited bank >> so he was released from the post in 2006 it's very important in 2006 in the meantime what happened after his transfer from that post then certain individual filed a a fire complaint >> saying that during his January more than 70 cr of rupees have been wrongly given on loan without following the order formalities banking rules and regulation knows that the bank job is to advance law otherwise why bank should be there is no purpose of being banned the question in that affair was that that was given without securing the security and without following the due proc it was in the year 2000 2016 then case was registered. I fully cooperated. Three years bail has been granted by this honorable court. Charge it has been filed. Then charge frame. Subsequently that charge has been put into challen that proceeding even has been state by very interesting. Now during my tenure the entire alleged is that till 2016 more than 70 was wrongly given up. After 2016 I had nothing till 2000. Then subsequently a second aire happened to be brought against me saying that within that tenure again 5 cr was sanctioned by so I put to challenge that second a before this report saying that this 5 is one of the transaction of 70 >> okay >> this report was satisfied with submission with the case of the petitioner and this report was the second saying that you emulate since it is one of the transaction of 70.

[01:46:32]So there was ML. Now second FI has been not very interesting. This particular case if I show my load from the FI basically it is not los against FI.

[01:46:44]Nowhere my name is there. There is no allegation against me. This F my lord it was closed in 2024 and my lord and what is the gra and what is the allegation in the fire is that in 2019 my in 2019 one bank manager wrongly falsely issued one no give certificate to pre uh this HM enterprise Mr. by one.

[01:47:23]If there entire allegation is against for issuing the uh this no certificate irrespective of the fact that there was a due certain was to be made. I just want to bring some 11 >> but then he had issue >> anyway whatever maybe we'll not go into that because since we are not going to dispose of today >> yeah that is why >> this is no problem Honorable was pleased to grant me the protection said that no poss 25 repeatedly instruction was sought for but for the reason based not >> now uh I think this it's time that you just tell them the instruction is necessary for the purpose of disposal of the matter I I take my apology what happened what happened on last occasion madam Mhm.

[01:48:42]>> Informant private number two very unfortunately my lord this step was not taken upon the respondent number two >> which I have taken recently I think I'm sell the property also now means that appearance of >> and because of that one my last 1786 my >> oh that was vacated My lord.

[01:49:06]>> Oh then >> that only for that before. Oh that was that is why >> I thought why you are submitting >> my that is why only otherwise my lord I am ready my lord this matter may be fixed at any time my lord then I will >> I thought it was not required you are submitting >> only for this purpose my this is only for technical >> see see the technique of the advocate >> no only for this purpose only till that time I may be protected this is the evidence of the process of law even >> see see uh who who appeared for The who is the no thereafter what happened after 7 any any steps taken >> against you immediately?

[01:49:50]>> No no no after that whether the police has taken any steps against you. No >> no no no >> then >> they will not do anything. The case is of which which year?

[01:50:02]>> Don't worry don't worry they will not do that. No don't worry you some assurance that is >> so no once you fail it's very difficult to regain >> otherwise my on merit my no >> merit will dispose of >> on merit protection this is very this technical aspect only Otherwise this is no case at all against me.

[01:50:45]>> Okay. We will dispose of if there is no case you they will not do anything against you. Uh Mr. Mr. L Mr. Oh for the L standing council for SCB praise father how much time would be >> can it be on 28 >> okay time to open >> by time I'll bring instructions written instruction in the matter Mr. Pan telling council for MB submit that inadvertently the written instruction in the matter could not be obtained. Therefore we pray for fathers one week when one week >> 28th 28th >> 28th yes on 29.

[01:51:58]>> Okay father some time to obtain the written instruction in the matter is pray for kama list. Oh yes, you are appearing on behalf of respondent number two.

[01:52:19]>> Yes my lord.

[01:52:20]>> Yes.

[01:52:20]>> Mr. SF then also in the party also hard. Mr. you are appearing for the first time Mr. >> No this is the second time.

[01:52:32]>> Okay mir you have anything to submit Mr. Sephra council appearing on behalf of respondent number two. Okay. Huh. Stafer that is paid for by the standing council for SB whether one week time is granted to obtain necessary in obtain written instruction in the matter to stop accordingly and I pray for command list this matter on 29. Is it okay? 29.

[01:52:58]>> Yes.

[01:53:00]>> Okay. My is notic one year.

[01:53:09]on which that the the the court will make an end of the disposal of the entire matter. Okay.

[01:53:16]>> Yep.

[01:53:19]>> Item number 15.

[01:53:27]>> Yes.

[01:53:35]was called and uh take notice upon respondent number two.

[01:53:56]My lord, uh this is a in fact my a successive bail application my lord.

[01:54:00]>> Okay.

[01:54:00]>> However my learned brother has not en the earlier bail the order of this honorable court. My lord >> why reason best known to him only my why the order of this court has not been >> asking him.

[01:54:12]>> Yes ma'am.

[01:54:14]>> So why you could have >> I in the >> is it the secret order? No special liberty was given. You need to file a report.

[01:54:31]>> We do not know. You were not given liberty. Show us where the liberty was given.

[01:54:41]Why I'm pointing out my why? Because my is aware of the notification.

[01:54:45]>> Mhm. If we have not known what what order was passed how we will comply with the notification, how the register will place this method before this honorable court who has passed the order. So one should approach this court with a clean hand manner.

[01:55:08]>> You are trying to convince that in present application they have not married NXD record please.

[01:55:23]>> What is this? nonvailable warrant etc. What is this?

[01:55:29]>> Your when I find a certificate for I remember >> okay there you have filed after getting recept.

[01:55:46]>> Okay. So then then what was the order passed by the line trial court? That is what we are asking.

[01:55:54]This is not required otherwise.

[01:56:02]So I think you have to fulfill those because in initially it was a notice was issued before that actually man he he was at the time of trial he investing he was epsonding man and epunding and later on in execution of nonvailable warrant of arrest he was again rearrested.

[01:56:23]>> Mhm. So my he has approached this honorable court and he has taken a liberty to approach the London trial court because it is not on the record but my lord this court was not inclined because he has absconded and it was the trial court who was found to be in the better position to get the status whether he will comply with the trial or not >> right.

[01:56:41]>> So on that expect again the trial court has rejected his bail that if he release on the bail at this stage he will not turn up during the trial.

[01:56:49]>> So that is the ground of the trial court rejecting.

[01:56:51]>> He failed. Yes, he failed >> earlier.

[01:57:00]>> Oh, then >> and all >> then what remains? What remains M for the charges?

[01:57:06]>> What remains?

[01:57:07]>> I convicted whether I noted I spent more than one year.

[01:57:13]>> Okay.

[01:57:15]very less >> what's the provision which section 4 six allegation is section six >> section >> it will be 20 years >> but it will >> one year is nothing before the amendment of 2019 you have not been to provide addition of come up this This matter after a after a week. After a week, my >> after a week 30 30 you want that fix that 30. After a week 30 after a week okay on 30 >> yes m we have to look into the service also madam later on m first they have tox then service because the even the victim has right to know what is the what is >> okay we'll say after a week after you file in the meantime. Okay with the additional it will come then we'll have to serve. Okay. Okay. Mobiliz number 16 >> 16 to 19 connected matters arising out of same FIR.

[01:58:31]>> The offense is under section 85 cruelty lordship.

[01:58:37]Morship has granted in protection to all the person by order date 22 6th 26 with a direction to appear before the IO within 10 days and accordingly the person appeared before the IO on 28 uh there is statement everything has been recorded so you appear before the IO >> yes I have >> whether have been arrested not arrested >> no >> no >> no we don't have the CD we have not received the CD >> not received not some other that may fix my >> okay Mr. Kil for the petitioner also had Mr. He had the land additional PP for the state for some that the case stud has not yet been received.

[01:59:32]Accordingly he prays for I think some more time for production of the case scan copy of the case if stuff pray when the prayer is uh the prayer is allowed stop at least this is matter again after m okay on on 30 okay the inter earlier than 201 then all all the mis M okay. Similar.

[02:00:06]>> Yes.

[02:00:07]>> Yes.

[02:00:11]>> Matter number 20.

[02:00:17]I think 20.

[02:00:20]Is there any other matter?

[02:00:23]Okay.

[02:00:27]Okay. What? Finally.

[02:00:28]>> Oh, book is there. Yeah.

[02:00:34]>> Not complete.

[02:00:36]>> Then what the effects my Lord rap issues are not there not in the paper book. It why any admission you want to file objection you respond number Oh, yes. Was also called police for probably received. Received final report.

[02:02:01]What remains then? What objection you want file?

[02:02:36]When this was filed council, you are not updated with yours.

[02:02:50]So there the case has already been submitted into final report FR nothing remains h yes no so what I'm saying is the case has been submitted into FR final report that means there is no case against uh against the accused applicant.

[02:03:24]So then in the before the court court probably will now issue probably must have also issued because it was 2025 only must have issued notice inviting the protest petition if there is any need to be closed.

[02:03:49]Nothing remains here. Nothing to be requested because there is no case.

[02:03:58]You don't have to reply also.

[02:04:01]Okay. And then uh before the trial court, you obtain instruction from the crime inform the client that case has already been submitted into final report.

[02:04:14]>> Yes. and whether he has received a notice asking him to file protest petition if any nothing remains otherwise uh Mr. >> for yours >> L council for the petitioner also had missh land additional PP for the state and Mr. A dang council appearing on behalf of the private responent number two.

[02:04:49]>> Okay. to SCP for the estate while placing the this message inform placing the message received from the OCPS nalagam submitted place the message received from OCPS nah whereby Right.

[02:05:20]>> It has been informed >> that the >> case has already been submitted into final report on 1912 2025.

[02:05:41]Stop. Envy of the above the learning council for the petitioner grateful.

[02:05:50]Uh some said he may be allowed to withdraw.

[02:05:56]Some said since the matter has become infrupturous he may be allowed to withdraw this criminal petition to which the L council appearing on behalf of the respondent has no objection.

[02:06:08]Please pray for uh According the prayer of the last, the criminal petition stands disposed of on withdrawn.

[02:06:25]A is withdrawn. Okay.

[02:06:35]>> Yes. Anything else? Item number 23. Next item.

[02:06:40]This is 22 23 next.

[02:06:41]>> Yes Lord sir >> has prayed for Bes 23.

[02:06:45]>> Yes Lord sir. Uh maybe not.

[02:06:49]>> Okay.

[02:06:49]>> Only that much.

[02:06:50]>> Dr. Huh.

[02:06:55]>> What was your full name?

[02:06:56]>> Dr. Band.

[02:06:58]>> Yes. Bog.

[02:07:00]>> Bianog for the applicant.

[02:07:04]Miss this matter. Next week >> next week or >> tomorrow if lordship I'll be there tomorrow at least >> next week >> tomorrow if lordship I'll be here >> tomorrow no tomorrow it's not possible >> this if lordship cancellation for the bail so let is for the notice only simple I came >> issue maybe notice >> only PP is there my lord >> okay >> 23 my land PP is also there So >> this is for cancellation of >> cancellation of bill only only issues that he was >> notice can be issued. Yes ma'am notice need to mandatory my because for cancellation >> Mr. Okay doctor >> learn council for the predition also Mr. CL edition PP for the state software.

[02:08:00]This is an this is an this intellectual application has been filed.

[02:08:07]as intellectual application under section 483 within bracket 3 BNSS has been filed for praying for cancellation of the bill and the bond granted by this court in AV number 37 2026 passed on >> passed on 29 2026 >> 29 2026 4 2026 issue notice.

[02:08:54]Who are the parties?

[02:08:56]>> Uh >> have you made the information of the party? Okay.

[02:08:59]>> No sir.

[02:09:00]>> Since Mr. accepted notice on behalf of the state respondent. No formal notice to be required to be where is the private respon not the that earlier one.

[02:09:13]>> Okay. 25 >> 29 and 26 wherein the inream bill was made absolute me.

[02:09:18]>> Okay.

[02:09:20]Where where is the private respondent?

[02:09:22]>> My respondent number two and three prangal. Okay. Okay. M2 category.

[02:09:29]>> This cancellation is basically for violation of the condition.

[02:09:33]>> Okay.

[02:09:34]>> Not for setting aside.

[02:09:36]>> No processing. Okay. Cancellation of the >> Yes. Yes. For violation of condition matter.

[02:09:41]>> Well, for violation of the bail condition. Okay. By the accused respondents. Okay. Yes, ma'am.

[02:09:53]>> Is not issue notice since so and so. Uh-huh. After that the petitioner shall take steps for service of notice upon the private respondent number two and three by uh speed post as well as by usual process within 3 days from today. Stop publish this matter after two weeks.

[02:10:15]After two weeks ma'am >> 23 what is this 24 lordship you can start for connection huh if it is at 110 >> and my lord one prayer in my lord the criminal petition which has been disposed of close my lord on fr where fr has been filed my lord there my lord this may be kept kept as a record Double Taken on record which is taken on record number 24.

[02:10:52]>> We'll continue because two some other election matters are there.

[02:11:01]We can complete item 24. Anyone?

[02:11:17]None appears on behalf of the petitioner on call.

[02:11:21]Miss this matter after a week. Okay.

[02:11:25]Matter number 27.

[02:11:31]Mr. Nal, are you ready?

[02:11:34]>> Yes, ma'am.

[02:11:34]>> Both side are ready.

[02:11:36]>> Yes.

[02:11:36]>> Criminal appeal.

[02:11:37]>> Yes.

[02:11:38]>> Then we then I think at 2:10 we 2:10 we have 110 also we have the delivery of judgment. 2:10 also we have a review petition and then no no at 2 at 2 after that election hearing thereafter it will come it appears >> what to do how long it will take to you >> it will not take much time >> h it'll take long time >> no no >> not much say around you're for the appalent >> yes ma'am Okay, this is regarding