Why Gold cannot be Redeemed and why The system needs a $100k XRP

Added: 2026-06-04

[00:00:02]Okay guys, technical difficulties didn't um allow me just to post this video yesterday.

[00:00:10]Hopefully that is resolved. I was recording. There was no audio. When I finally got the audio, the the graphic card was not recording the video.

[00:00:25]Basically, I spent like three or four hours and I decided to go to go to bed.

[00:00:30]So let's deal with this. Today we're going to discuss how gold doesn't have a place in the new economy and the need of a high value um density collateral just to prevent the collapse of comx London uh bullion market association and to prevent the redemption of gold. And why? If you got you have gold IRA, you're in serious trouble.

[00:01:01]Let's start with this. Uh I start with this. Um now the people believe gold will not lose the status of collateral because too many nations are loaded on gold.

[00:01:12]Most of you wrote this on your comments and I'm going to prove you that that's that's incorrect.

[00:01:19]Now, this is the next illusion I have to break in people's mind. Gold won't lose collateral status because nations hold a lot of it. This sounds logical, but it collapses instantly once you understand how collateral hierarchies work.

[00:01:43]Nations holding gold doesn't guarantee gold keep its collateral role.

[00:01:47]Collateral status is determined by function, not by who owns it. Gold can be widely held and still lose its systemic role in the same way that that like treasuries are widely held right now and and is losing their status. It's no different. Collateral status is not about ownership. It's about performance.

[00:02:12]People think if many nations hold gold, gold must stay important. Institutions think if gold cannot perform the required function.

[00:02:25]Sorry. Um if gold cannot perform the required function, it loses its role regardless of who holds it. Collateral must settle instantly, be auditable, be composable, meaning it can be used with another asset just to make it stronger. Be programmable, be globally interoperable, support high frequency reuse, support liquidity compression. Gold fails all of this. Ownership doesn't equal utility.

[00:02:55]Now, nations also hold treasuries and treasuries are failing as a collateral.

[00:03:01]If many nations hold it, it meant it stays collateral.

[00:03:07]Then treasuries will be safe forever.

[00:03:10]But today, China is dumping. Japan is reducing. Bricks are dolizing. Basel 3 is reclassifying. Ripple markets are stressed. United States debt is unsustainable.

[00:03:21]Treasuries are widely held and still losing their collateral supremacy. Gold is next. Gold is held as a reserve, not as a settlement substrate. That's the distinction people don't understand.

[00:03:33]Reserve equal store of value. Collateral equal setment engine. Gold is a reserve.

[00:03:39]It's not a settlement engine. In the new economy, settlement is instant.

[00:03:44]Liquidity is compressed. Collateral must be digital. And collateral must be programmable. Collateral must be composable. Go cannot do any of this. It doesn't matter how much of a nation hold.

[00:04:02]Go's liquidity profile disqualifies it from the new economy. Gold is slow, slow to move, expensive to verify, expensive to transport, impossible to settle instantly.

[00:04:16]um impossible to reuse at high uh frequency, impossible to fractionalize on chain natively. Instant verification, instant collateralization.

[00:04:28]That's what it's required, an instant settlement, um instant reuse, instant liquidation. Gold cannot meet this requirement. Gold is too slow for the new world.

[00:04:39]Now, nations holding gold is a legacy behavior, not a future design.

[00:04:45]um nation's whole goal because it predates fiat. It predates digital systems, instant settlement. It predates tokenization, predates basel 3 rules, predates the uni ledger. Gold is a historical artifact. It's a dinosaur, not a futurep proof substrate. And I'm going to explain why. And you may agree, you may not agree with this. But I never found like uh logic make people change uh once they they create an idea. But still I need I need to prove you this.

[00:05:18]If the new collateral is cheaper than gold, then the system fails. This is the part that destroys those who reject this argument. If gold stays collateral, the new system cannot scale. If the new collateral is cheaper than gold, gold remains superior. Therefore, the new collateral must be more valuable than gold. This is not opium. It's just value density.

[00:05:44]The real reason people cling to gold, it's psychological. There's really no logical behind this. Goal feels ancient.

[00:05:52]Goal feels safe. Goal feels physical.

[00:05:55]Gold feels sovereign. Gal feels familiar. But the system doesn't care about feelings. It only cares about throughput, latency, liquidity, and settlement physics. Gold cannot operate at the speed of the new economy.

[00:06:11]The reality is gold will remain a reserve, but it will not remain the collateral of collaterals. It can't. Not because nations don't want it, but because the system cannot use it.

[00:06:25]Functions beat traditions. Physic beats nostalgia.

[00:06:30]Throughput beats history.

[00:06:33]You can ask why they don't use it in a form of digital gold. This is the next predictable objection and it collapses instantly once you understand the physics of collateral. People ask why not just use digital gold.

[00:06:46]Digital goal is still gold. Tokenizing a slow asset does not make it fast. You can turn a physical low velocity asset into an instant setment collateral engine by putting it a wrapper on it. A tokenized rock is still a tokenized rock is still as a rock. Still heavy, still unmovable.

[00:07:06]Now tokenization doesn't fix gold fundamental problem which is physical settlement. People think if we tokenize gold, it becomes instant. No, tokenization makes the representation instant. The underlaying asset is still physical, slow, expensive, verify, expensive to move, impossible to settle instantly, impossible to rehypotheate a high frequency. Digital goal equals digital claim on a slow asset. All you're doing is you're creating a claim.

[00:07:36]I'm going to explain you what's the problem with creating claims.

[00:07:41]Instant settlement requires instant finality. Now, in the new economy, settlement is atomic. Finality is deterministic. Collateral must be verifiable in milliseconds. Collateral must be movable in milliseconds.

[00:07:55]Collateral must be reusable in milliseconds. Gold can't do this even if tokenized. The underlying settlement is custodial delay, trustbased, non-final, non-atomic. This violates the entire architecture of instant settlement.

[00:08:11]Now you can say digital gold now introduce a counterparty risk and the opposite of it's the opposite of what a collateral requires. Now tokenized gold requires a custodian an auditor a vault legal jurisdiction a trust framework a redemption mechanism and that's the problem redemption.

[00:08:30]Now this means counterparty risk, jurisdictional risk, seizure risk, rehypotheation risk, audit risk.

[00:08:38]Collateral must be neutral, trustless and self-verifying. Digital goal is none of this.

[00:08:45]Digital goal cannot support high frequency collateral reuse. In the new economy, collateral reuse cycles shrink from hours to milliseconds. Liquidity compression increases, throughput explodes, margin calls become real time.

[00:09:00]settlement windows collapse. Go cannot be rehypothecated instantly, verified instantly, liquidated instantly, recolateralized instantly. Tokenization doesn't fix this problem. So this is a goal cannot scale to PQ. Now global PQ is hundreds of trillions in assets, quadrillions in derivatives, trillions in daily settlement. Gold cannot scale, compress liquidity, support instant margining, support atomic swap, support programmable set, support composable liquidity. Digital goal is still non-composable.

[00:09:37]Now, digital gold also cannot be the base collateral because it's not neutral. Gold is held by nation, stored by vaults, controlled by governments, subject to seizure. Seizure, subject to sanctions, subject to political pressure, a global settlement substrate, must be neutral, apolitical, borderless, seizure resistant, censorship resistant, cryptographically verifiable. Digital gold is none of this.

[00:10:06]If the new collateral is cheaper than gold, the system fails. This is the part that my critics fail to see. If digital goal is the collateral and it's cheaper per unit than physical gold, then the physical goal remains superior. There's no need to create a new collateral and then we're going to be in the same situation that we are right now. Meaning the new system can scale. The new system cannot compress liquidity. The new system cannot replace gold. The new system cannot support instant settlement. Digital goal is a representation, not a replacement.

[00:10:41]Digital goal is a derivative.

[00:10:44]That's it. The new collateral must be a substrate. Digital goal equals claim.

[00:10:50]New collateral is a base layer. Digital goal is a slow asset wrapped in a fast interface.

[00:10:57]New collateral is a fast asset at the base layer. Digital goal equals trust.

[00:11:02]New collateral cryptographic finality.

[00:11:05]And digital gold belongs to the legacy system. New collateral belongs to the new architecture.

[00:11:11]Now if you digitize gold or treasuries, you are not creating real collateral.

[00:11:16]You are creating a synthetic claim on a slow failing asset. Asynthetic claim are exactly what created the derivative bubbles that we have today. This is the part nobody wants to face because it forced them to admit the truth.

[00:11:31]Tokenizing a broken asset does not fix the asset. It only multiplies the claim on it which is how bubbles form.

[00:11:40]So digital gold equals synthetic gold.

[00:11:43]Tokenized treasuries equals synthetic treasuries. Synthetic assets equal more claims than collateral. More claims than collateral equals derivatives bubble.

[00:11:53]The system is already drowning in synthetic collateral. The new system cannot be built on more of it.

[00:12:01]Now tokenizing gold simply creates claim not collateral. When people say we'll use digital gold, what they actually mean is a token representing a claim on a bar in a vault controlled by a custodian in a jurisdiction with legal risk with redemption risk. This is not collateral.

[00:12:23]This is a derivative. A tokenized claim is not the asset.

[00:12:29]It's a promise.

[00:12:31]And promises are what break in liquidity crisis.

[00:12:35]Synthetic assets multiply claims exactly like derivatives bubble. The derivatives bubble happened because one real asset was used to back many synthetic claims across many layers with no transparency and no instant settlement. Tokenized gold does the same thing. One bar, many tokens, many rehypotheations, many claims, no instant physical settlement, no finality. This is the same architecture that broke 2008.

[00:13:04]You are not fixing the system. You are recreating the problem.

[00:13:12]Synthetic collateral fails under stress every time. In a crisis, okay gets questioned, custodians freeze, jurisdictional intervene, redemption halts, collateral chains break. I mean, you can't redempt your gold, liquidity evaporates, synthetic assets always fail first. This is why AIG collapsed, lean brothers collapse, bursts collapse, repo markets froze, derivatives cascaded. The system cannot base its future on synthetic collateral.

[00:13:44]Tokenizing gold does not make it instant. People think if we tokenize gold, it becomes fast. No, you're just making the claim fast. And the the underlying asset is still slow, physical, non-programmable, non-composible, non-interoperable, non instant. You cannot build an instant setment economy on top of a non-instant asset.

[00:14:05]The new system cannot be built on synthetic assets. It needs a base layer.

[00:14:12]The new economy simply requires instant settlement, atomic finality, programmable liquidity, high value density, and neutrality. Synthetic assets cannot do this. Only a native digital asset can. Not a wrapper, not a claim, not a derivative, a substrate.

[00:14:33]Now the real reason people cling to digital gold is because they don't understand the difference between a token, a claim, a derivative and a base collateral. They think tokenization transform them in gold and and super quick. And it's not true. Tokenization only changes the interface, not the physics of the asset. A slow asset wrapped in a fast interface is still a slow asset. All you're doing is creating a claim.

[00:15:02]Digital gold is synthetic gold.

[00:15:05]Synthetic gold is a derivative and derivatives cause the bubble. The system cannot be built on derivatives. This is why treasuries fail, gold fails, tokenized gold fails, tokenized treasuries fail, synthetic collateral fails. The new system is a native neutral instant high value density self-verifying and global collateral substrate. Not a rapper, not a claim, not a derivative, a base layer.

[00:15:32]Now, if gold hits $10,000, the entire paper go market detonates.

[00:15:39]Every holder of synthetic gold, futures, and allocated accounts, ETF, rehypothecated claims will try to redeem and the system cannot deliver. And this is exactly why gold is too risky to serve as a collateral. Goal is not just not ideal. Gold is a systemic liability.

[00:16:02]Paper gold is 200 300 times larger than physical goal. This is the core problem.

[00:16:08]Comics London uh bullion market association and allocated goal accounts, gold ETF, rehyperated bullion, fractional reserve bolting. All of these create synthetic claims on a tiny physical base. For every one ounce of real gold, there are 200 or 300 ounces of paper claims. This is the definition of systemic fragility.

[00:16:33]If gold hits 10K, every synthetic holder will demand physical. At 10K, the psychology flips. I want my bar. I want delivery. I want physical, not paper because the premium becomes enormous.

[00:16:47]Trust collapses.

[00:16:49]Counterparty risk explodes. Vault audits become suspect. Custodians freeze redemption. This is exactly what happened in 1983, 1968, 1971 and 2008.

[00:17:01]But now we'll be on a much larger scale.

[00:17:05]The system cannot deliver the physical goal. Even if 1% of paper gold holders demand delivery, comics defaults, London Bullion Market Association freezes, ETFs halts redemptions, can redeem, bullion banks collapse, vaults declare major force. Why? Because the gold doesn't exist.

[00:17:26]It's a creation. The entire system is built on fractional reserve gold, synthetic claims, unallocated accounts, derivatives, leverage. This is the same architecture that created the derivatives bubble.

[00:17:40]Gold becomes a liability, not an asset under stress. Collateral must be deliverable, liquid, reliable, instant verifiable, instant transferable. Gold under stress becomes non-deliverable, illlquid, frozen, contested, rehypothecated, legally encumbered.

[00:17:59]This is the opposite of what collateral must be.

[00:18:03]Banks and institutions cannot cover the redemption wave. If gold hits 10K, bullion banks cannot deliver. ETF cannot redeem. Comx cannot settle. London Bullion Market Association cannot allocate. Central banks cannot release reserves. BS cannot meet claims. This triggers cascading defaults, collateral shortages, liquidity freezes, margin calls, systemic contagion. Gold becomes a systemic risk, not a solution. This is exactly why gold cannot be collateral of the new economy. Goal introduced catastrophic counterparty risk through synthetic claims. The new system cannot be built on derivatives, rappers, claims, custodian, vaults, jurisdictional risk. It needs a native neutral digital self-verifying substrate.

[00:18:54]Now why people still cling to gold?

[00:18:56]Because they don't understand the scale of paper gold market. the leverage, the rehypotheation, the synthetic claims, the redemption risk, the settlement physics. They think gold is safe, but gold is only safe as a reserve, not as a settlement substrate and definitely not a as a global collateral.

[00:19:20]So the reality is if gold hits 10K, the system will break. If if the system breaks, gold cannot be collateral.

[00:19:27]Therefore, gold cannot be the base of the new economy. Gold is a store of value, not a settlement engine. Gold is a reserve, not a collateral substrate.

[00:19:39]Gold is a legacy asset, not a future architecture.

[00:19:43]Is there any law that prevents the paper gold holders from redeeming into physical gold? You can say, "Oh, no, they cannot." There is no law preventing paper gold holders from redeeming into physical gold. The system simply cannot deliver. So it relies on policies, fine print and major force closes to avoid the collapse. Now there is no law stopping redemption.

[00:20:08]There is only a system incapable of honoring the redemption. So it uses legal structures, custodial terms and emergency powers to avoid delivering physical goal. This is why gold cannot be the collateral of the new economy because it's unredeemable. Now, paper gold contracts explicitly say they can settle in cash, not metal. Please guys, read your contracts. Comics, London Bullion Market Association and ETF contracts all contain closes allowing cash settlement, delayed delivery, substituted delivery, force measure, commercially reasonable efforts. These are legal escape hatches. They exist because the system understands and knows it cannot deliver physical gold. This is not a law preventing redemption. is a contract designed to avoid redemption.

[00:21:09]ETF like GLD explicitly state you cannot redeem physical gold. You're holding paper. Retail holders of GLD cannot redeem physical gold. Only authorized participants, big banks can and even they can be denied during stress. The GLD prospectus literally says the trust may settle in cash. This is not a law.

[00:21:33]is a designed choice to prevent redemption.

[00:21:37]Comics in London bullion market association have a force majure clauses.

[00:21:41]Force measure allows delivery delays, delivery cancellation, cash settlement, contract modification. But I'm going to explain you why even cash settlement is impossible for these banks. If gold hits 10K and redemption request spike, this cause discloses will be activated immediately. Not because of law, but because the system cannot deliver.

[00:22:05]Derivative holders are a liability, but not because banks owe them physical go.

[00:22:10]They are a liability because banks owe them performance and banks cannot perform if the underlaying collateral fails. Derivatives don't require physical delivery, but they do require margin, collateral, liquidity, solvency, and counterparty performance. And that is where the systemic risk lives. Now derivatives are not physical obligations. They are performance obligation. A gold futures contract does not force any bank to deliver gold. It forces the bank to honor the contract, settle the price difference, maintain margin and stay solvent. So the liability is not that they owe you go.

[00:22:51]The liability is we must remain solvent enough to settle the contract. And that's where the danger is.

[00:23:00]Banks don't fear physical delivery because they don't and they can redeem.

[00:23:04]They fear price volatility. Banks can always cash settle. They can always refuse physical delivery. They can always invoke there's a major cause and preventing us from delivering uh the physical. But they cannot escape the market to the mark to market losses, margin cost, collateral shortages immediately when the price goes up, liquidity drains, counterparty failures.

[00:23:29]This is the real liability. But I'm going to give you examples. Now the liability is in the collateral chain, not in the gold itself. Derivatives require collateral posted, collateral reposted, collateral rehypothecated, collateral value daily. If gold spikes, collateral requirements explode. Banks must post most collateral in order just to uh ha have it as a as a bedrock. They don't have it. They become insolvent. So the liabilities we cannot meet collateral requirements if gold moves too fast. Not that they have to redeem you with gold. When gold rises, the derivative system becomes a black hole and it's game over. If gold goes from 2,000 to 5,000 to 6,000 to $8,000 to $10,000, then short positions blow up, margin calls explode, collateral requirements skyrocket, banks cannot meet them, liquidity evaporates, counterparties fail, contagion spreads, and this is the real systemic risk. No physical delivery, collateral failure.

[00:24:32]Now, synthetic gold is 200 300 times leverage. This is the real liability.

[00:24:37]For every 1 ounce of real gold, there's 300 ounces of synthetic claims existing.

[00:24:43]Banks are short. Hedge funds are short.

[00:24:46]Bullion banks are short. ETFs are fractional. Comx is fractional. If gold spikes, the system cannot meet margin, meet the collateral, meet settlement, maintain solveny. This is the liability.

[00:25:02]I'm going to explain you why.

[00:25:04]Why the system must introduce a new ultra high value collateral? Because if they don't, gold spikes, synthetic claims explode, collateral requirements explode, banks fail, comics fails, um London bullion market fails, derivatives cascade, global credit freezes. The new collateral is not to redeem gold. It's to stop gold from becoming the collateral of last resort.

[00:25:35]Because if gold becomes the collateral of last resort, the entire system collapses.

[00:25:42]The reality is derivatives are likely not because banks owe gold, but because banks owe performance and they cannot perform in gold spikes. This is why gold cannot be allowed to rise. Synthetic gold cannot be redeemed. IRA holders will be wiped out. Any of you that is IRA IRA holder on gold, contact your financial advisor. A new ultra high value collateral must be introduced. And I'm going to explain why it needs to be especially an ultra high value collateral and why it must be introduced.

[00:26:21]Now people can say Bitcoin holders didn't redeem other tokens and this is may maybe the same where is the difference the exact right question is and and this is one that destroys the bitcoin it's equal same as gold argument immediately because once you compare bitcoin redemptions to paper gold redemption they're not even remotely the same system bitcoin holders cannot redeem anything gold holders can and that's the problem bitcoin has no redemption risk because it has no underlaying asset. Paper gold does have a redemption risk because it's a synthetic claim on a physical asset.

[00:27:01]So this makes gold inf infinitely more fragile than Bitcoin. Bitcoin equals closed system. Gold is a fractional reserve system. That's the entire uh difference. Now Bitcoin is one to one.

[00:27:14]Gold is 200 300 to one. Bitcoin is one bitcoin. on Bitcoin. No fractional reserve, no synthetic claims, no unallocated Bitcoin, no vaults, no custodial promises, but gold for each ounce of physical. They're creating 300 ounces of synthetic claims. An allocated account ETF, future rehypothecated bars, fractional voting, Bitcoin cannot be redeemed because it's not a claim. Gold must be redeemed because it is a claim.

[00:27:43]That is telling you it's a claim. It's made to be reclaimed. Bitcoin holders don't redeem because there is nothing to redeem. Bitcoin holders can sell, hold, trade, self-custody, but they cannot redeem because Bitcoin is Bitcoin. You can't use reclaim Bitcoin for something else. Now, gold IRA holders, ETF holders, comics holders can redeem and they will and the system cannot deliver.

[00:28:13]So, gold IRA holders can demand physical gold in theory. You can demand anything you want but in practice they will never receive it. There will be cash settle because the system cannot deliver physical metal and this is exactly why the system becomes unstable when gold rises.

[00:28:31]Demanding physical doesn't equal receiving physical. You're right. IRA holders can request physical gold. ETA holder can request comics can loans can stand for delivery. London Bullion Market Association clients can request allocation. But here's the real rule.

[00:28:47]They can demand physical, but the system is not obligated to deliver physical.

[00:28:53]Every contract has substitution clauses, cash settlement clauses, former measure clauses, delivery denial clauses. So yes, they can demand all you want, but no, they will not receive it.

[00:29:07]A 300 to one synthetic gold system, it's creating liabilities far larger than the banks can pay. And this is why you're not even going to receive a cash settlement. The reason is not that they owe physical gold as I explained before.

[00:29:22]The reason is they owe collateral performance and the collateral cannot support the leverage.

[00:29:28]300 to one leverage means banks owe 300 times more price exposure than they can handle.

[00:29:37]When the system creates one real ounce of gold, 300 ounces of synthetic gold claims, the bank is effectively short 299 ounces. If gold rises 2,000 to 6,000 to 10,000, the bank short position explodes. This is the liability, not the physical delivery.

[00:29:57]I'm going to make some some math and you're going to see banks don't go bankrupt because they owe gold. They go bankrupt because they they owe money.

[00:30:05]When gold rises, every synthetic claim must be marked to market. Every short position must be collateralized. Every derivative must be margin. Every counterparty must be paid. This require cash, not gold. And the banks don't have the cash.

[00:30:22]For example, cash settlement doesn't save the banks, it destroys them. IRA holders can only receive fiat. Correct?

[00:30:30]But here's the key. Cash settlement forces the bank to pay the full price difference on 300 times more exposure than they have collateral form. For example, a bank is short 300 ounces.

[00:30:43]Gold rises to $1,000. Bank owes now $300,000 in cash. 300 per each ounce.

[00:30:53]But only has collateral for one ounce.

[00:30:56]$1,000. Imagine all the trillions of ounces, billions of ounces, how much money the banks owe.

[00:31:05]Insolvent instantly. This is why cash setment is not a solution. It's the trigger for insolveny. Either way, you're screw.

[00:31:16]Gold IAS are mostly synthetic, not physical. Most gold IAS hold unallocated gold, pulled gold, ETFs, future exposure, custodial claims, not serial number bars, allocated gold medal, delivery uh deliverable uh deliverable bullion. So when gold spikes, IRA holders will say give me my gold. But the custodian will say we will settle in cash because the gold doesn't exist. But they cannot even settle in cash. So the system must force gold down or collapse. You understand why they cannot allow gold to go higher? If gold continues rising, comics collapses, London bullion market association collapses, bullion banks collapse, derivative cascade banks, global credit freezes. So the system has only one option.

[00:32:12]introduce a new collateral that is far more valuable than gold to pull the man away from physical metal. They need to add they need to make people forget about gold and forget them to redeem into gold because they can't deliver and they don't have the money. If they do that, the system goes back to 1930 or or worse. This is the only way to stop a redemption wave. Now, IRA holders will be the first casualties.

[00:32:46]I know it sounds bad. If you're into IRA holders, think what you're going to do before the storm hits the ship.

[00:32:56]The whole synthetic goal, they cannot redeem. They cannot demand physical.

[00:32:59]They cannot migrate into the new collateral. They can contractually force into cash settlement. When the new collateral appears, gold IAS will be repriced, not repriced higher, will be repriced lower. Cash settle, wiped out.

[00:33:14]And this is the conflict of interest.

[00:33:15]I'm speaking the system must and will save itself, not the IRA holders. The system always win. And and the collateral, as I keep saying, it will be what the system requires.

[00:33:30]Now, a new ultra high value collateral 100,000 XRP is the only escape for the system. If the nuclead is 50 50,000, 75,000, 100,000, then gold holders will migrate, synthetic gold holders will swap, redemption pressure disappears, comic survives, London bullion market survives, and the banks survive. And and life is good and everybody's happy. Why?

[00:34:00]because nobody's going to switch gold if the if the new collateral is $1,000.

[00:34:09]If XRP is $5,000, nobody's nobody's going to believe an asset that is cheaper than than than gold. And even if it goes to $10,000, I rather stay with gold because gold has been proven for years, centuries.

[00:34:23]So why will I go for a digital asset?

[00:34:26]Most of the gold holders, they don't believe in digital assets. So the only way to make the system survive is to make them trust in something that is infinitely way better and more valuable than gold.

[00:34:42]If the nucleateral is 5K, 10K, 15K, then gold remains superior.

[00:34:48]Gold redemption continues. Nobody will will switch gold will swap. So comics collapses, banks collapse, global depression, parity equals debt. If you have the same price as gold as the collateral that hopefully is going to be XRP, you're dead. Now you need to give something that's way superior in order to survive the system for the system to survive. I'm right. The system always wins guys because they control the settment. They control redemption. They control custodians. They control pricing. They control collateral rules.

[00:35:30]They control the transition. And all of you who disbelieve that the the system will make an um a systemic repricing.

[00:35:40]I don't know. I mean there's nothing I can I can do or say in order just to believe it to see it. The IRA holders do not.

[00:35:49]This is why they will be sacrificed first. The system always wins, not the retail.

[00:36:00]The reality is gold IRA holders think they are protected. They are actually the most vulnerable group in the system.

[00:36:08]When the new collateral appears, their synthetic goal will be repriced or wiped out. The system will save itself, not them.

[00:36:18]Now, if the system introduces a new ultra collateral, gold will not stay at 10K. It will be forced back down toward its real non-colateral price, maybe $300, $800.

[00:36:33]Why? Because the premium disappears.

[00:36:35]Gold IRA holders will be cash settled in whatever the custodian chooses, likely stable coins, and they will have zero recourse. This is a conflict of interest I've been speaking. The system must save itself and will save itself, not the IRA holders. And yes, the system always wins.

[00:36:54]Gold at $10,000 is a systemic emergency, not a victory. Gold at 10,000 means comics is near default. London Bullion Market Association is near default.

[00:37:04]Bullion banks are insolvent. Synthetic gold liabilities are exploding.

[00:37:08]Redemption pressure is rising. Vaults cannot deliver. This is anything but but bullish. This is systemic cardiac arrest. The system cannot allow gold to stay at 10,000. To stay at 6,000 will be cavity.

[00:37:28]The only way to stop a gold redemption crisis is to introduce a superior collateral is the new collateral. If the new collateral is 50k, 75k, 100k, then gold holders will migrate.

[00:37:45]Synthetic gold holders will swap.

[00:37:47]Redemption pressure will disappear.

[00:37:48]Comment survives. Everything survives.

[00:37:53]Once the new collateral is introduced, gold will collapse back to its non-olateral price. Trust me, gold current price is 20% store of value, 80% collateral premium. If gold loses its collateral role, the 80% premium disappears. Gold collapses to its industrial jewelry value. $300, $800 becomes realistic.

[00:38:19]This is not manipulation. This is collateral repricing.

[00:38:25]This is the conflict of interest I've been speaking. Gold IRA holders want physical gold protection, real value.

[00:38:32]The system wants to avoid comx collapse.

[00:38:35]avoid uh London Bullion Market Association collapse, avoid the banks to collapse, avoid bullion bank insolveny and avoid a derivatives cascade and to avoid a global depression. The system will sacrifice the IRA holders because the new system and the system always save itself first.

[00:38:56]This is why a massive value density collateral is the only escape. I don't know how many times I had to say it. I'm I'm I'm I'm giving you every every every proof of what is going to happen now because the derivatives bubble is unredeemable.

[00:39:17]The gold cannot absorb it. Treasuries cannot absorb it. Synthetic gold is to leverage. IRA holders will demand physical. Comics cannot deliver. London bullion market association cannot deliver. Banks cannot deliver. The only escape is introduce a new collateral that is far more valuable than gold. So gold holders migrate into it instead of demanding physical metal. This is the only solution.

[00:39:45]There's no other exit.

[00:39:49]The reality guys, gold IRA holders will be wiped out. Gold will be collapse will collapse once the new collateral appears. cash or stable coin settlement will be forced. The system will save itself, not the people. And if you're surprised of this, well, you haven't lived too for too long. Um, the derivatives bubble is far far larger than reported. Bank claims 600 trillion, 800 trillion, 1 quadrillion, but these are netted numbers. The real growth is 1.5 quadrillion plus shadow banking derivatives plus offshore swaps plus synthetic gold claims plus rehypothetic claim. The number is unknown. And that's the problem. When the system doesn't know its own exposure, the exposure is unmanageable.

[00:40:32]It's period. It's simple. It's we're far worse than than we think. Now, synthetic gold is the most dangerous part because comics is fractional. LBMA is fractional. ETF are fractional. And allocated gold are fractional.

[00:40:50]For every 1 ounce of real gold, they created 300 ounces of synthetic claims.

[00:40:55]If gold rises, liabilities explode, redemption pressure spikes, value of vaults cannot deliver. Banks become insolvent. This is why gold at 5,595 is not bullish. It's a systemic alarm. And we reach this in January of this year.

[00:41:12]Now if gold hits 6K 10k the system collapses because synthetic gold holders demand physical comics cannot deliver.

[00:41:21]London bullion market association freezes. Boolean banks fail. Derivatives cascade. Liquidity evaporates. Credit markets freeze. The governments knows this. The banks knows this. They need the Clarity Act ready. Ready now because if they wait, they're done.

[00:41:40]And this is worse than 1930 because we have more derivatives and we have quadrillions because of the derivatives.

[00:41:46]We have almost no liquidity right now.

[00:41:49]And this is why the system must must must introduce an ultra high value collateral. Not high, ultra high. Not because they want to, not because they have but they have no choice. You see, they need to redeem. They need to prevent the redemption of gold. comics or not. If they don't do it, comics will collapse, London will collapse, the banks will collapse, major banks will collapse. Uh even um um Black Rock will collapse.

[00:42:25]The world enters a depression worse than 1930. The only way out is introduce a new collateral that is way more valuable than gold. So the synthetic goal holders migrate into it instead of demanding physical goal. It's not difficult to understand. This requires 50k minimum 100k ideal. I explain why 50k ideal because price equal value density and equals collateral power. Parity has no incentive no superiority. So superiority will mean migration from gold to XRP.

[00:43:02]Now banks know the truth. That's why they are so desperate. They know the derivative bubble cannot be redeemed.

[00:43:07]There's no way the gold system cannot deliver. Treasuries are failing.

[00:43:11]Collateral scarcity is extreme.

[00:43:14]Liquidity is evaporating and trust is collapsing. They know the system is one shock away from lights out. This is why they need a new collateral substrate.

[00:43:25]The reality the system is in serious trouble. The derivatives bubble is unredeemable.

[00:43:31]Gold cannot save them. Treasuries cannot save them. Only a new ultra high value collateral can prevent the collapse. I'm not describing opium. I'm describing the only mathematical viable exit. See you in my next video, guys.