When wealthy, well-educated women refuse to have children due to the 'dating game'—a system where status is a zero-sum game and women choose to marry up rather than have children—society enters a terminal demographic decline. This phenomenon, observed in East Asia, North America, and Europe, signals civilization collapse because the superstructure cannot sustain itself when its core demographic foundation erodes. The solution requires either immigration or fundamental changes in societal values, as materialistic societies where status is measured by wealth and social media followers rather than patriotism or religious duty face inevitable decline.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Wealthy and Educated Women are Refusing to Have Children — And the Elite Plan to Replace ThemAdded:
Super number three is the one we live in. And here you have a dating game, right? Because why?
Because the odds of you obtaining status is really, really low. Okay? And the only way that you can change your status is by marrying up.
And that's why you have a dating game. A dating game is opportunity for you to find someone better than your social demographic circumstance can suggest.
Okay? And that's why you have low uh decreasing uh fertility rate.
Okay? Where over time because of the dating game society will collapse.
Okay. Does that make sense?
All right.
So now you're the government and around the world women who are wealthy, well educated are refusing to have children, especially in East Asia. Right now the fertility rate in China is about one.
Okay, about one. The replacement rate that you need is a 2.1. So just to maintain your current population levels, every woman in China needs to give birth to at least two kids. But right now on average, women are choosing to have one kid only in China. And the worst thing is that this trend is increasing. So 5 years ago, the fertility rate was maybe 1.7.
Now it's one. Okay. So the trend is very very negative. Okay. So governments all around the world are trying to figure out what to do. How do you convince women to have more kids?
And what we've discovered is it's impossible.
We can pay you more money like they do in South Korea. Guess what? It doesn't work because people don't want money.
They want status. And status is a zero- sum game. Okay? Money is infinite. But status power is a zero- sum game.
So when you have overpopulation, when you have too many people competing for two status, too few status positions, you have decreasing fertility rate. And there's nothing you can do about it. The moment you give women choice, they choose to improve their lives by marrying someone better.
Okay? Not all but most. And so over time, what happens is your society collapses. If you look at history, the best indicator that a society is about to collapse is if the women who are wealthy and well educated, if they refuse to have children. This is the same. This is what happened to the Romans who collapsed. This is what happened um to many empires. This is what's happening around the world today in America, in Britain, in Europe, in China. Okay? And this tells us that society is collapsing. So in other words, what this really is, okay, these superructures, it tells us the life cycle of a civilization, right?
So this is when you when civilization is young then it mature it grows and then it collapses.
Okay.
And if you look at history all civilizations go through this process of birth maturation and then collapse.
and there's no way around it. So the power of game theory is that just by studying one aspect, okay, if I just study this game, all right, I figure out who the players are, the rules and the incentives, I can figure out what the super structure of the civilization is. Okay, and then once I have these two, I can now figure out where it came from and where it's going.
Okay, that's what I want to teach you in this class. How to analyze a situation so you understand the players, the rules and incentives which will give you insight into superructure so that you can figure out where it came from and then you can also predict where it's going.
All right.
So, but you can also look at the superructure and figure out what the game is being played.
Okay. So, this is one example, but but throughout the semester, we'll be doing many many different examples of game theory. Is this clear so far?
Are there any questions?
Any comments? Any questions before I move on?
All right.
All right.
All right. So let's just look at some basic facts. Okay.
All right. All right. This is a map of the world. Okay.
As you can see. Okay. Oh, sorry. So the color scheme is this. The red is where the population uh the society has an above replacement fertility rate. Okay. So above 2.1. If it's dark red like here in the middle of Africa, it's six to seven or six above.
Okay? And why why is it that the case?
Because Africa is in in a situation where it is a growing society with middling tech. So a lot of people die, lots of competition. So to survive, families have to give birth to a lot of kids. Okay? They have no choice in the matter. But then you move to the rest of the world. Okay? So this is um North America, Europe, and East Asia. the three wealthiest parts of the world. And guess what? The fertility rate is collapsing because now we've entered the endgame where it is overpopulation, too much wealth, so too much inequality. And so women are forced to pick the best possible mate or not have children at all. All right? And here the situation is very very dire. North America and Europe are kind of okay. Why? Because immigration. because even though their women are not having children, they can choose to import people for their labor force.
But East Asia is really really screwed, guys. Okay, so just look at this region.
Okay, so China is one, but the worst is North Korea. Sorry, South Korea. South Korea has the lowest population uh rate in sorry the lowest fertility rate in the world. They're at between 0.6 to 0.8. So they're probably gone in 50 years time. It's so bad that when you go to South Korea, they have signs outside restaurants that says no dogs and no kids. They think that kids are a problem. Okay. So you look at the these areas again they are poorer so women are forced to have more children in order to survive. Okay but you look at wealthy areas well they'll probably be gone in 100 years time.
Okay you it's total total collapse.
The solution the governments are choosing right now is to import immigrants.
Okay. Especi So these are the trends right now and it's causing a lot of disruption in society because guess why guys people don't like outsiders. People don't like immigrants but they don't have a choice of matter because along with the fertility crisis is the aging crisis where your population is getting older and older. Okay. So life the world is not that simple. If you want to know who will rule the world in 100 year time, 100 years time, just figure out which society in which society do wealthy well educated women choose to have children and then that society will rule the world. Okay, it's that simple, right? Well, unfortunately, if you do it that way, you get a really, really disturbing answer. Okay, >> now pay attention to this part because Professor Jang is revealing something that connects the quiet decay of domestic communities straight to the breakdown of modern sovereignty. This is a crucial insight from Professor Jang.
When a civilization transitions away from organic growth models and replaces human replacement with mass administrative immigration, it changes the baseline balance of the entire state asset map. The systemic collapse of the demographic pyramid is not an accidental cultural shift. It is the mathematical outcome of an ultra materialistic system that forces families into hypercompetitive zero sum games for social position. When survival requires isolating yourself from community networks to chase paper status tokens, population reduction becomes a certainty. The infrastructure cannot survive on synthetic labor updates forever. We are watching the terminal life cycle parameters of a society that has institutionalized its own extinction. So this is per capita G uh GDP. Okay. So how much people make? All right. So obviously if you're zero you're very poor and um if you move to over here you're very wealthy. Okay. So United States is the wealthiest society in the world. Right.
Sure. We can understand that. Then this is the fertility rate which tells us how many children women have on average.
Okay, so again 2.1 is replacement rate. Okay, 2.1 is replacement rate. So United States is actually below replacement rate, but the United States doesn't really care because it can import immigrants. Okay, um China is probably around here somewhere somewhere. Okay.
Um, Angola is up here, but it's poor.
So, what this map tells us is a country that is most likely to be dominant for the next 50 years is this country, Israel, okay? Is it is the only wealthy western high-tech society in which women choose to have more than two kids.
Okay, this is what game theory teaches us. And yeah, I know there are people like, "Yeah, but Israel, it's um it has 9 million people and um it's in the middle of a desert and everyone hates Israel. I understand that. Thank you very much." Okay, I understand that. But if you just analyze how the game works, okay, if you just look at it objectively from a game theory perspective, you are forced to conclude that Israel right now has the major advantage over everyone else. Now, it is possible that societies will change the fertility rate as the as the world changes. Okay? But I'm saying that given the current state of things, Israel their growth trae trajectory is very very high.
But then the question then is okay why is it that Israel they are different from everyone else?
And the answer is because the world hates them. Okay? Because they think they are different from everyone else.
and they must unite together to survive.
So in Israel, fertility is status.
Okay? If you are a woman and you give birth to a lot of kids, that means that you love Israel. That means that you are doing what you can in this war for survival.
It means you are a patriot.
Okay.
Um but this has to do with religion.
So what the west has done is not only um has it created a dating game where women can choose to have kids but the western world has also given up on religion and embrace materialism.
Right?
So what is valued in our world in the west? It's not patriotism or love of family or religious duty.
It's just how many Instagram followers you have. It's how many YouTube subscribers you have. It's how many how much money you have. Okay? That's all that matters.
So given the current state of state of events, it's very hard for the Western world and really for China to survive for the next 50 years. Okay. And I and I know like well China has a billion people. So even though um you know we're only giving birth to 10 million kids a year which will still be around for a long long time. Okay. So at this rate by 2100 China will be will be at a population about 600 million. That's still a lot of people man.
Um okay here's the problem though. Okay. This is South Korea. Okay. South Korea is like the worst case scenario and for South Korea this is actually the best case scenario where okay given current trends and let's let's just pretend that nothing bad happens to South Korea.
Well, by the year 2100 you you'll have a situation like this where the vast majority of people are over 65 and you have no kids. Okay, that is a zombie society where no one works and everyone just I don't know walks around the park every day.
No one works. So the economy has collapsed. Okay. So look look look at this trend where we are now in here.
Okay. Where the majority it's still a working population which is good. You need that for the economy. But by the time you hit 2040, okay, you got this huge dependency and a craving population. Okay. Do you guys see this where we are in um Okay. So we're at 2020, right? Okay. All right. So it's still not too bad.
But by the time you hit 2040, look at this. Okay, look at this. M. Look at this. Where you have absolutely no kids and then you have lots and lots of retirees. Okay.
And then by the time you hit 60, oh my god, right?
Your population, your working population has decreased by half, by 50%.
All right.
So if things are stay the same, if nothing happens, South Korea will be will be dead in I don't know by 20 150. Okay, best case scenario. But what we know from history is that society should not die naturally.
Eventually South Korea will be forced into wars, new economic crisis. So this trend will just increase. And so if North Korea get got past 2080, I'd be very surprised. Okay? I would be surprised by 2040 South Korea were to face collapse as a nation state.
Okay? Because you need these people to work. But guess what? You also need them to fight wars. So if North Korea ever threatens South Korea, most of your adult population be dead.
Okay. So, South Korea cannot fight a war. Now, the prospects for South Korea is utterly hopeless. There's nothing South Korea can do about this because South Korea is an extremely materialistic society where the only way only way to get ahead is by making a lot of money. Okay? And if you're a middle class person in South Korea, it makes no sense for you to have three kids. makes sense for you to have one kid and put all your resources into this one kid in the hopes that he passes the college examination, gets in a good university, and then gets a good job at Samsung, which is the only company in South Korea. Okay, Samsung, right? So, the situation is pretty dire in South Korea.
All right. Okay, that's it for today.
>> This is Professor Jong's core thesis.
The visible fractures running through modern workforce dependencies and crumbling pension allocations are merely the baseline warnings of an approaching civilization endpoint. When a population becomes entirely motivated by external financial wealth over long-term generational survival, the entire framework enters a terminal spiral. The system is breaking because its old structures can no longer convince a highly educated populace to make sacrifices for the future, leading to a landscape populated entirely by aging dependencies and hyperinsulated corporate hubs. But I want to know your calculation on this. Is it logistically possible for a modern society to reverse a terminal demographic decline once it surreners its core values to financial materialism? Or is a total civilizational reset mandatory? Leave your analytical breakdown in the comment section below. Hit that subscribe button to stay ahead of the collapse and I'll see you in the next disclosure.
Related Videos
DeenTheGreat Is Absolutely DISGUSTING
challzbrown
681 views•2026-05-29
Choa Chu Kang Tragedy Raises Questions About Warning Signs and Relationship Violence
TwentyTwoThirty
872 views•2026-05-29
Why Is It ALWAYS About The Pregnant One? 😂
alikicomedy
9K views•2026-05-30
Flotilla activist on 'racist' response to Ben Gvir's video of her
MiddleEastEye
13K views•2026-05-29
10 French Cities That Could Collapse First as the Homeless Crisis Worsens
InsideEuropeToday
359 views•2026-05-29
White People RECOUNTS How Great Black People Are Becoming So Fast Now They Can't Take It
mrsan_20
939 views•2026-05-30
Foreign-Owned Shops Targeted as Anti-Migrant Tensions Rise in South Africa
aljazeeraenglish
25K views•2026-05-30
Elections Are Rigged! Only Those In Government Can Tell How ~ Diana Ngao & Mark Ouko
RadioGenKe
696 views•2026-06-02











