Modern philosophy, particularly through the lens of Archbishop Lefebvre's critique, rejects immutable essences and absolute truth, replacing them with subjectivism and evolutionism. This intellectual liberalism, which claims freedom for all without obedience to divine law, paradoxically leads to totalitarianism of thought where dissenters face persecution. The rejection of fixed order and the creator results in a worldview where truth becomes whatever one thinks it is, and humanity is seen as perpetually evolving toward an indefinite future, ultimately culminating in the dangerous notion that humanity itself becomes Christ.
Inmersión profunda
Prerrequisito
- No hay datos disponibles.
Próximos pasos
- No hay datos disponibles.
Inmersión profunda
Fr. Hewko, History: Toxic Philosophers Behind the Revolution 5 /15/26Añadido:
Auditorium maximum of 2 minutes We continue. This is history.
We continue with Archbishop Lefebvre's overview [snorts] of history.
Which is very important and to have the right angle on history.
What book is the best summary of all of human history?
From God's point of view.
You say the scriptures? The scriptures.
That's right. It's all historic.
It's all uh inspired.
And it's the right vision of history.
From God's point of view.
Okay, so we saw last time Descartes, Kant, and now Jean-Jacques Rousseau.
He was one of the philosophers of the French Revolution, Jean-Jacques Rousseau.
R O U S S E A U Jean-Jacques Rousseau.
He's the one that promoted the noble savage idea.
That man left to himself will be innocent, pure, sinless, and so ever so kind and harmless.
Is that true? No.
If Cortez never came to the Indians in Mexico, would they still be would they all be peace-loving and and kind to each other and No, when he arrived, what were they doing?
Eating each other. Eating each other, sacrificing children, young men, ladies.
Tearing their hearts out. So, Jean-Jacques Rousseau All right. He emancipated from Rousseau emancipated from its object having lost common sense.
The subject is left without defense faced with the common opinion.
The thought of the individual is going to be dissolved into the public opinion.
That is to say, in what everyone or the majority thinks.
And this opinion will be created by the techniques of a group dynamics organized by the media which are in the hands of the financiers, the politicians, the Freemasons, etc. So, what is that system of government called based on the vote of the people?
Democracy. Modern drivers. Modern democracy. Now, modern democracy has to be distinguished from what the ancients understood as democracy.
The ancients understood something again at a very at a very um >> [clears throat] >> small level.
Like the city. You can elect [clears throat] your mayor of your town because everybody kind of knows everybody.
And and democracy works in such a system.
Or a smaller system like A village. The village or the the team of scientists or the team of medical doctors or the team of of uh stone workers, you know? It's it's uh even a even a as simple as a hockey team or basketball team or football team or baseball team. You you The team elects their captain.
And that works, right? Because everybody knows this one knows the game well. He's a good leader. He He's He understands the game, so forth and so over. He's a good player. He's a good example. So, this one should be the captain.
Right?
Normally, that's how it goes. The The team elects their the the captain and assistant captain.
And the coach just approves.
So, that's where democracy works best is at a small scale.
But at a national scale, it's it's easily manipulated as we know today.
And this was Archbishop Lefebvre saying, uh public opinion everyone or the majority, whatever they think.
And this opinion will be created by the techniques of group dynamics organized by the media. So, the media they're going to have a huge influence on who's elected.
And which are the hands of the financiers, the politicians, the Freemasons.
So, as Dr. Williamson Frederick Williamson, who taught at the University of Texas, he was a great Thomist.
And uh a great defender of Francisco Franco as well.
May his soul rest in peace. But he used to say that in the '60s color TV was just coming out. And it had a huge if effect on who the people voted for.
So, here on on color TV, you've got the gray old Nixon.
Right?
Richard Nixon.
And he's gray, you know, he's not They don't put makeup on him and do his hair special to appear on color TV, right?
It's just something new. They don't even think about this.
And here is the new young dazzling JFK, John Kennedy. So, they They put a little makeup on him, make his hair, make him look flashy and young.
I mean, he won at a landslide.
Not for what so much as he what he represented, but he was young, charismatic. He looked a lot better than the old gray dying Nixon.
And that's That's what he said. The the media can manipulate the voting very very easily.
By its By its own impulse, intel- intellectual liberalism falls into the totalitarianism of thought.
I repeat, by its own impulse, intellectual liberalism, that is, freedom for all without obedience to God's law, falls into the totalitarianism of thought.
Now, isn't that true?
Isn't that true?
Think of the totalitarianism of of totalitarianism of thought today.
You say anything against Israel, anything against the Jews, you're automatically labeled anti-Semite, right? And you can lose your job, you can lose your voting capacity.
People get you know, really even put in jail.
Right?
Fortunately, with all the scandals of Israel going on now, with the genocide and the bombings and the injustice and the sacrilegious publicly done, people are waking up and realizing, "Hey, they're they're really abusing this anti-Semite slogan. Anyone who says an anti-Semite now who just criticizes Israel."
People are kicked out of school for it.
So, that's totalitarianism of thought, isn't it?
Right? The liberal says you can think what you want, say what you want, but if you say anything that doesn't fit their square choral, then you're kicked out. Totalitarianism of thoughts.
After the rejection of the object, after the rejection of the object, we are seeing the evanescence of the subject.
That is the rising up of the subject being more important, which is thus ripe for undergoing all forms of slavery.
Subjectivism by exalting freedom of thought results then in the crushing of thoughts.
Isn't that interesting?
Subjectivism by exalting freedom of thought results then in the crushing of thought.
Anybody give another example?
What modernist Rome?
Everyone is allowed to come to Rome. Everybody is embraced.
Everybody is acknowledged and recognized. Except who?
The traditionalists. The true traditional integral Catholics.
They're cast out.
In the modernist modernist Rome picture, the true followers of tradition in the line of Archbishop Lefebvre, they don't they don't even want to talk to them.
The second mark of intellectual liberalism, All right, so he's Okay, let's back up again.
>> [clears throat] >> We're talking about >> [cough] >> the two key words, subjectivism and evolution, which are manifest intellectual liberalism.
>> [snorts] >> The first we saw was subjectivism. Now, we're going to treat of evolution.
>> [snorts] >> The second mark of intellectual liberalism we have mentioned is evolution.
By rejecting the submission to the real, the liberal is drawn to reject the immutable essences of things.
The unchanging essences of things.
For him, there is no nature of things.
There is no stable human nature ruled by definitive laws set down by the creator.
So, in other words, for the liberal, there is no absolutes. There are no absolutes.
2 + 2 is 4. That's very constricting.
Now, we're modern and we believe that 2 + 2 can be, you know, other other numbers, 10, 15, 20.
We're not so confined as they were back in the Middle Ages where they really believed 2 + 2 is 4.
That's the thinking.
Man is in perpetual progressive evolution.
The man of yesterday is not the man of today.
One collapses into relativism.
Doesn't matter what you believe.
Isn't this well describes the modern man?
Right?
What is more, man himself creates himself. He is the author of his own laws, which he has to refashion incessantly according to the sole inflexible law of needed progress.
So, the only real law is you have to always be progressing, moving forward, ever modern, ever updated.
And that gets old. Look at all the college kids and high school kids.
They're all trying to be cool and individual, right?
But they're all walking around in sweats and some kind of What do you call those things on their feet?
>> Man Uggs. Man Uggs?
>> They're called Uggs. Uggs?
>> Like a plastic clog?
I don't even know.
>> [laughter] >> All right, but everybody's dressed up with everybody has tattoos. So, where's the individual in the in the liberal thinking?
They're all the same.
There are no individuals. They talk about being in my personal individual, but they're all the same.
Right? And all the girls are in pants.
They're all look the same.
So, >> [laughter] >> the inflexible law of needed progress.
Then it is evolutionism in all its realms, biological, Lamarck and Darwin.
So, there's several levels of evolution, okay?
This is what he's touching on. So, first, the biological evolution, which is man comes from apes.
And the author of that, of course, is Lamarck and Darwin.
Charles Darwin.
So, they go into, you know, the amoeba crawls out of the primary primordial soup, which is struck by lightning and somehow life emerges. And this little amoeba turns into a squid, and the squid crawls out of the puddle and becomes a frog, and the frog evolves into a uh part part dog and part monkey, and then the monkey evolves into an ape, and the ape evolves over billions of years into man.
And they really believe this science fiction. And they they teach this in the schools today.
They don't call it theory anymore.
>> [snorts] >> They don't even have the respect to call it theory, they call it they just treat it like fact, yeah.
And they have all these diagrams of, you know, the little squid and the amoeba grows bigger and then and then eventually it's a man.
And it's just talk about science fiction.
Then it is evolutionism in all its realms, biological, intellectual, intellectual evolution, rationalism, and it's myth of indefinite progress of human reason.
Rationalism and the myth of of the indefinite progress of human reason.
The myth of the indefinite.
Because there is a there is a true, obviously, a true development of reasoning. Just look at St. Thomas Aquinas.
People can reason and think. That's not what he's talking about. This intellectual evolution is is man cannot hinge from truth.
That's the the poisonous evolution they're talking about.
Where, you know, we'll be at an age someday when blue will be green and green will be orange and two and two will equal 10 and and no truth will exist, just whatever you think it is.
So, the defiance of of of of absolute truth.
That's what he's talking about.
And then moral evolution.
Moral evolution.
So, it was fine for the girls of the '20s and '30s to wear dresses, but today, we we know that morality is not doesn't apply anymore. Women can wear whatever they want, show as much skin as they want, dress as much as as they want to dress like men.
No moral laws.
So, emancipation from natural law.
Emancipation from the natural law.
And the divine law and the 10 Commandments.
No more do I have to be faithful to one wife till I die. I can drop her, marry someone else, and still go to communion in the conciliar church, which is a heresy of Pope Pope Francis.
The moral heresy of Pope Francis.
You can give communion and approve the lifestyle of the divorced and remarried.
That's moral evolution.
In the past, the church taught this.
Now, Vatican II teaches this. You see?
You follow?
And then And in that case, there is no moral law.
And then And then political religious evolution.
Emancipation of societies with regard to Jesus Christ.
So, no no submission to Christ the King at all. He's completely irrelevant to our political decisions and laws, and even our religion.
You know, he claims to be the only way. Well, we're we know better now with Vatican II that there's many paths. The Holy Spirit uses many paths to to the same God.
Which is utter blasphemy.
But that's evolution.
And Pope Benedict XVI really believed this. He said Syllabus of Errors was good for its time.
But now we have we have Dignitatis Humanae, Gaudium et Spes, Lumen Gentium.
In the old days, they had a mass that was good for the old days. Now we need a mass for modern democratic independent man.
The new mass.
The crest of evolutionary delirium, as it's well expressed by Archbishop Lefebvre. Evolutionary delirium, that's what he's it's exactly the word it is.
In other words, the crest, the height of evolutionary insanity, is reached with Father Teilhard de Chardin.
Father Teilhard de Chardin.
He's a Jesuit and evolutionist.
And he's so bad that he went to some Asian country, found a bone, and declared it was uh one of the missing bones to to show the link between apes and and apes and men.
It might have been the Piltdown Man.
I forget which one it was. Piltdown Man or the Peking Man.
And he was claiming this bone shows the link.
And of course, after he died, they did study on the bones and what they find?
>> [laughter] >> They find it was a pig bone that had been filed with a file and stained with with dye.
That's Vatican, too.
That's the new world.
That's the new world order. Lies. Looks looks real and old, but it's it's lies.
A farce.
He died in 1955.
He was condemned under Pius XII.
And his his his works were condemned also and they were forbidden to be taught in seminaries and universities.
But most of the American seminaries didn't care.
And they kept teaching him.
And he's the one that says we're all evolving into where all will be one into this huge omega Christ.
But we're all heading to the noosphere.
And And Pope Benedict was soaked in his poisonous well.
Yeah. It's kind of like that picture that me and Michael saw in one of the gift shops where it was a picture of Christ carrying somebody and they were sharing an eye.
Like Christ's eye was connected to his and it made one eye. Oh, yeah. That was written That was one of the main souvenir gift shops. Yeah, and that was one of the symbols approved at the Vatican for representing some movement. It might have been synodality. Yeah, no, that kind of arc came out with Pope Francis. Or it became more popular. Yes, and it has a meaning, too.
So, Teilhard de Chardin, who affirms in the name of pseudoscience and a pseudomysticism that one, matter becomes spirit.
>> [snorts] >> Matter becomes spirit. Now, that is a contradiction in terms.
But, that's evolution. Matter becomes spirit. That's the first major error he promoted.
Imperfect can become perfect.
That's evolution. You can get from imperfection, you can get perfection.
From chaos, you can get order.
That's evolution.
Matter becomes spirit. Nature becomes the supernatural.
Nature becomes the supernatural. Isn't that the height of blasphemy, isn't it?
So, that's Pelagianism, isn't it? The nature can obtain supernatu- supernatural grace without the help of grace.
Humanity becomes the Christ.
Humanity becomes the Christ.
Whatever the Christ is.
It's the omega Christ in his language.
But, you see the the thinking it's very prevalent in today's thinking.
Humanity is ever evolving to become this global Messiah.
Christ. Yes. This was the explicit teaching of John Paul the second, too.
Yeah.
>> With theology of the body.
And even in his uh opening sermon, when uh when he was first pope, he said, "Man is Christ." Yeah.
Yes.
It's frightful.
And you can see how it connects very well with preparing for the Antichrist.
The Antichrist, will that be his language? You are Christ.
And notice there's truth to it.
Because we really are Christ in the true Catholic understanding by what?
Divine grace. Through divine grace, and we belong [clears throat] to Christ.
He's the head, we are his His body. His body. Yes.
So, the devil always, you know, he always rides on truth.
But, he distorts it.
He cuts it out and fills it with a new meaning.
Lucifer's smart.
Um there's a there's a clip of a of a of a Catholic man who's who's saying how the liberals always promote abortion.
"This is my body."
That's their That's their their words.
They used Christ's words when he gives the blessed sacrament, pouring himself out on the cross, dying for the love of our salvation.
But, they twist the demonically twist those words. "This is my body. This is my right. I can kill this so-called blob in me as much as I want.
Up to the ninth month, and even at birth in some countries now, like Israel.
They can kill the baby up to birth, which is a satanic mockery of the mass.
The sacrifice of Christ, the sacrifice of the babies on the altar of pleasure, pride, and convenience.
So, back to Teilhard de Chardin, who affirms in the name of pseudo-science and a pseudo-mysticism that matter becomes spirit, nature becomes the supernatural, the humanity becomes Christ.
A triple confusion of an evolutionist monism, irreconcilable with the Catholic faith.
You cannot reconcile this with the Catholic faith.
For the faith, evolution is death.
For the faith, evolution is death. They speak of a church that evolves. They want an evolving faith. You must admit, they say, you must submit to the living church, to the church of today.
They were writing to me from Rome these words in the mid-70s, as if the church of today should not be identical to the church of yesterday.
I answered them, quote, "Under those conditions, tomorrow it will no longer be what you are saying today."
Those people have no concept of truth.
They have no concept of being. They are modernists. And he's talking about Rome.
The cardinals in Rome, and the Pope.
They are modernists.
They don't believe in an unchanging truth. Everything must be evolving.
And that's that's Vatican II and the new mass.
And even the new mass is a ever-evolving.
All right, it's always adapting and changing.
So, we could say the five There are five main principles of the modern world.
And let us touch them now.
Here, Cipriano, can you erase the board?
So, remember we saw that with nominalism, there is no more substances, no more absolutes.
You can't know the essence of a thing.
If there's no essences, then everything is reduced to voluntarism, to man's will.
What I want will be true in this thinking. What I want by my will, not because it's true objectively, and I submit to it, but what's true is from my will.
So, we analyze the ideology, the modern system of thought, the indifferentism of the state from any creed to pronounce and the the The state doesn't have to profess the Catholic faith or any religion.
But, the state will enforce this new ideology of these five principles.
of the we could call it the five principles of the new world order.
And what are they? These are infallibly always applicable. One, progressivism.
And the archbishop spoke about this, too.
Progressivism.
Everything is changing and it's always for the better.
All change always for the better.
So, remember we said a number of classes ago, the ancient way of thinking was circular, right?
And you respected.
You respected the ways of your fathers and your ancestors.
You didn't You didn't transgress the boundaries set by them.
But remember we said how Christ changed that vision to a linear vision from from this world to the next world and to eternity.
in heaven or hell.
So, Christ is the one who radically changed the vision of history.
Christ himself.
And put it from this world, we are going to heaven. Repent.
Appropinquabit in vos regnum Dei. The kingdom of heaven draws now draws near.
>> And it brings to vision the end of history also.
Matthew 24 and 25, which is Um, the general judgment. Yes.
All human history is going to have an end.
And it's after that, it's eternal, heaven or hell.
So, what a radical change of thinking.
But, this was perverted.
This was perverted by the liberals and the modern philosophies.
So, that the linear vision of history is this world.
And it ends in this world with a paradise on Earth.
Paradise on Earth.
Hence, capitalism with everybody owning everything in a wonderful materialistic world, or Pius XI >> Oh, communism. Communism.
Capitalism or communism will hold this dream of the of a materialistic paradise.
Okay? So, progressivism is this drunken idea that all progress, all change is for the better.
Now, it's modern times.
You leave those dusty old ways behind.
Ever hear those expressions?
Yes.
To say that five centuries ago would be unheard of. They would consider you like a insane guy.
Abandon the ways of our fathers.
It would be absurd. A principle that everyone should accept is change.
This is the modern way of thinking.
It applies to the modern mentality.
Advertising does this. They break all morality to advertise their products, right?
The less skin, the more bold the advertising, right?
The French philosopher one of them said, "Man has always the desire to change, but now desires to be closer to what doesn't change."
Change is to have structures always produce order to non-change, to virtue. Now man wants to change to actualize change.
He wants to actualize change.
Modern man wants change to not be out of fashion.
Change to have more change. No longer for the perfection, but just don't let others surpass me.
To be in the mode, to be with it or woke in today's silly language, which requires no virtue.
Modern society thinks we are in an era of science left behind in the dark Middle Ages.
So, all change is for the better. That's progressism.
The second principle of the modern world is evolution or evolutionism, and we just saw this with Archbishop Lefebvre.
But it's it's what's deadly about it, it allows the renouncing of a fixed order and the creator.
That is the first cause, first mover, etc. of the five proofs of God's existence.
>> [snorts] >> Everything is ever evolving and changing. No fixed order in this vision of evolution.
It knocks out the natural question, who put this order?
>> [cough] >> Who put this order?
The creator.
The first cause, the first mover.
It renounces the idea of the efficient cause.
No efficient cause outside of the universe.
So in St. Thomas, de Deo creatore, the study of God as the creator is abolished.
So evolution says it comes from within itself.
If there's no creator and there's no fixed order, no supreme intellect to put order and laws and creation, then where does How does it evolve?
How is change happening if there's no external cause, no first cause, where is it all going to come from?
Where Where is the the in the impulse, the drive of evolution going to come from if it's not from outside?
Where will it come from?
The impulse towards change and evolution and and and and improving in their way of thinking, then where is it going to come from?
It's not If it's not from outside, it's going to come from where? From within man.
Subjectivism, yes.
>> [clears throat] >> And it's called by St. Pius X immanentism.
Manens, which means to stay over there, im means in, inside.
Immanentism, inside the person.
So, since truth will no longer be outside me, it's going to be in inside me.
And we'll pick up next time.
>> [clears throat and laughter] >> Adjutorem nostrum in nomine Domini.
>> Qui fecit caelum et terram.
Videos Relacionados
BSA Goldstar - I gave up! And why animals beat humans!
thebingleywheeler
102 views•2026-05-31
The 'Islamic dilemma': Quran tells Christians to judge by the Gospel
canceledkings
1K views•2026-05-29
Seneca - Escape The Crowd, Find Your Inner Peace!
realfreewisdom
114 views•2026-05-29
Scholar Explains: WHAT IS A GNOSTIC?
fightbackpodcast
965 views•2026-05-31
Fulton Sheen: A Mente Tenta se Manter Jovem para não Sofrer com os Impactos do Tempo
SantoCotidiano-port
673 views•2026-05-29
Why Pure HEDONISM Is IRRATIONAL
qnaline
12K views•2026-05-31
When They Ignore You, Do This Instead | Stoicism
ZenithWisdom-e3k
615 views•2026-05-31
The fourth great humiliation. #jimmycarr #crowdwork #hecklers #standup
jimmycarr
576K views•2026-05-28











