Peterson brilliantly uses a ridiculous syllogism to expose the danger of prioritizing formal structure over factual reality. It is a sharp reminder that an argument can be perfectly logical yet entirely divorced from the truth.
Inmersión profunda
Prerrequisito
- No hay datos disponibles.
Próximos pasos
- No hay datos disponibles.
Inmersión profunda
It Called Itself a GeniusAñadido:
[music] [music] >> So, the Yes.
The inference rule is Is God supernatural?
Yes.
Uh demonstrate the existence of supernatural things.
Well, God is a metaphysical necessity. I can I please >> Demonstrate the existence of metaphysical necessities.
Can I Can you please stop muting me?
>> After you demonstrate the existence of metaphysical necessities.
>> me. So, you admit you're muting me, you stupid idiot. Look at you. I never said that I muted you.
>> Yeah, you did. You said after. So, when I told you, "Can you stop muting me?"
you said, "Oh, after you demonstrate what the metaphysical necessity >> keep talking about [ __ ] goats?
>> I just quoted you verbatim, you dumb stupid idiot. Look at you. You have literally no way of proving any of that.
>> Now, let me speak. Demonstrate the existence of a metaphysical necessity.
May I speak?
If you demonstrate the >> We can We can grant that Yeah, we can grant that. If you demonstrate the realness of a metaphysical necessity.
>> one thing can be like uh a necessary that's not ex- No, I can't grant that at all. I have no idea if necessary things exist. Go ahead and prove them.
>> said you said you believe that things uh exist eternally, I value, correct? It's contained from like another s- Demonstrate the existence of a metaphysically necessary thing.
Uh yeah, so it'd just be something that is not contingent upon >> ask for you to explain what it is. I I asked for you I didn't ask for you uh demonstrate its existence.
Okay. Well, well, actually, what I said was provide evidence of a metaphysical necessity.
>> Okay, yeah, so God is necessary and God is possible. So, God is possible.
>> I didn't ask for you to restate your claim >> is necessary >> in the form of a syllogism. I asked for you to demonstrate that it's real.
Yeah, hence forth, God will be necessarily necessary. All people named Batological are goat [ __ ] Your name is Batological. Therefore, logically, you are a goat [ __ ] Find the contradiction.
>> Okay. Wonderful. So, >> Find the contradiction. May I please speak? Find the contradiction.
Yeah, please speak. Find the contradiction.
No, no, you can shut up while I speak, all right? So Find the contradiction.
You >> [laughter] >> need to yourself. Please let me speak.
Why would you say that to the guy who can move you?
>> Find the contradiction. All people that go by Battle Logical on TikTok are goat [ __ ] Okay, okay.
>> You go by Battle Logical on TikTok.
Therefore, you are a goat [ __ ] Find the contradiction in the argument.
Yeah, so one's in the chat if I'm winning, two's in the chat if this Yeah, two's in the Find the contradiction. See what what's going on is it knows that there isn't a contradiction.
Uh the syllogism is totally valid. But >> Well, no, taking Battle Logical's view is that well, I don't have to demonstrate whether or not >> you I don't have to demonstrate whether or not it's sound. All I have to do is make the argument because empirical evidence doesn't count for anything in in this goat fucker's world view. So, it has to concede that there's no contradiction in it being a goat [ __ ] >> Dennis, you're such a But it But it can't do anything about this claim. It can't undermine the claim without appealing to empiricism. Let me see.
Okay, fine. Yeah, sure.
>> Where's the contradiction?
Hey, goat [ __ ] where's the contradiction?
Yeah, please speak.
You can find the contradiction in the goat [ __ ] syllogism, goat [ __ ] >> wonderful. Yeah, so the contradiction, well, it's not a contradiction, but the what you seem to have a problem in the S5 axiom syllogism would particularly be me saying that >> No, it was a goat [ __ ] syllogism.
Premise one, all people that go by Battle Logical on TikTok me saying that I'm a goat >> [ __ ] Premise two, carefully speak. you go by Battle Logical on TikTok. Conclusion, therefore, you are a goat [ __ ] This is true.
Okay, so >> logically proved it. Okay.
Okay, so you want evidence? No, I want I want you to deal with the claim that I just proved you're a goat [ __ ] Uh me proving what exactly? Did I prove that you're a goat [ __ ] When did I say that? I never said that.
>> Oh, ridiculous.
>> I didn't ask if you said it. I literally I I am pretty explicitly saying that I said it.
>> Where did I claim to be V1?
You don't have to. I logically proved it. Did I or did I not logically prove that you are a goat [ __ ] Yeah, so even even if I had Did I or did I not prove logically that you're a goat [ __ ] >> Even if I did say that, you have no proof.
>> This has nothing to do with you saying anything. I'm the one that has the syllogism here. You're just You're just doing sillygisms, whereas I'm doing a syllogism. I'm doing proper philosophy.
Would you like the inference rule? Did I prove logically that you're a goat [ __ ] No, you haven't proved [ __ ] So, can you please let me No, actually the argument Is the conclusion guaranteed by the premises?
Is this trivial or are you just playing like some >> Is the conclusion guaranteed by the premises? game? Is the conclusion guaranteed by the premises?
Is the conclusion guaranteed by the premises? Uh, hence if you take like for example my first argument >> yes or no question. So, the only thing if you do anything other than say yes or no, you will get muted. So, Okay, so does the Is the conclusion guaranteed by the premises?
Okay, okay, so the premise No, you still didn't say yes or no.
Yes. Okay, now my >> Okay, therefore I logically proved that you're a goat [ __ ] Go on. Okay, wonderful. Wonderful. So, when it comes to the S5 axiom, right? So, technically I haven't proved that God is a metaphysical necessity. That's why I used my first argument against you, which let's say premise one would be based on empiricism, right? So, that's just me saying that there's a finite amount of matter contained in infinite Euclidean space, right? So, I took the say the fraction one over aleph-one because aleph-one would just be the smallest cardinal infinity, which is uncountable by three spatial axes. Well, in this case it would be space, right?
And what you get will either be two one of two answers, which mathematical geniuses like myself usually argue about. It's either going to be zero, zero just wouldn't make sense because Did it really just say that?
He's also very humble if you haven't realized. [clears throat] Yeah, so it's going to All goat [ __ ] are, yeah.
Okay, so if it's zero, then that just means that matter doesn't exist, which is a contradiction. Or if it Or it could be undefined. And if it's undefined, then it just doesn't It breaks the law of non-contradiction again because the universe absent of mind is defined and it's also undefined. That just wouldn't make any sense. How can it be both defined and undefined? So now we know that God is a possible metaphysical necessity, right? So if God is possibly necessary, necessarily possible, he's necessarily by necessity necessary in all possible worlds. You just conceded.
I haven't conceded anything. You haven't demonstrated that anything you just said is true. You're batshit crazy right now.
Look at you. You're baked. You're You're baked, dude. You're baked. I cooked you.
>> cooked, not baked, [ __ ] idiot.
>> Yeah, yeah. How does it feel to lose?
Goat [ __ ] How does it feel to lose?
I I wouldn't know.
Can I Can I ask you Can I ask you >> What is your name? I can't even see the whole thing. I don't know. It says bachelor of arts. Can I Can I ask you Why why Why do you keep saying it like aleph? You're the only person I've heard say it like that.
Aleph? Yeah, why are you saying it like that? Because there's nothing wrong with saying aleph one.
I mean, I don't know. You're right, there's What do you say? You say aleph? Aleph.
>> No. I don't say aleph. What the [ __ ] Why would that be the alternative that you pick? I don't know.
I I don't think you understand what's going on. Let me say something.
>> Doesn't make a difference.
Doesn't make a difference. You guys want to say something of substance. For a second cuz I've been trolling. How does it feel to >> not Do you not understand that the only reason this hasn't been going well for you is because he's using your own logic against you? Is that gone completely over your head this entire time?
Or are you just pretending?
Yeah, so are you going to mute up like a good little concubine while I speak?
Are you going to continue to speak and mute me?
I'm not muting anybody. Okay, well >> Every time it actually has the opportunity to talk, it doesn't it doesn't address anything that anybody said to it.
>> I absolutely did. Look at you. You're fried.
You have a you have a negative canthal tilt. I am a little bit fried, you got me there, but that doesn't mean you won the argument.
>> You have [laughter] a negative canthal tilt. Look at your eyes.
>> No, I don't. The cam the camera is way above me. No, you have a negative canthal tilt.
>> I literally don't.
>> You got to you got to start bone smashing.
>> pathological Bone smashing Maybe can you maybe go outside and touch grass? Who the [ __ ] cares about a canthal tilt?
What is wrong with you? You It's over for you.
>> the things that you talk about you think? He's into goats, dude. You're asking him the wrong questions. He's into goats. He He He touches grass all the time cuz, you mostly grass, so you know, when he when >> When he's when he's porking goats, he's touching grass. Woah, you got me. Yeah.
I just don't know is this is that the kind of thing that you like think girls really are into when they hear you talk about that? You like, yeah, dude, his negative canthal tilt and my bone smashing are not He's He's into goats, dude. You're asking him the wrong questions. He's into goats.
>> go live, people >> Excuse me, do you think female goats are Well, I don't know about female >> Once I leave, you're going to leave too.
>> Goats in general are into it? I promise you that. No one's going to stay here once I leave. Have you ever cut your dick on a tin can inside the anus of a goat?
Have you done?
Have you ever cut your dick on a tin can inside the anus of a goat? Wait.
I can't really hear anything. Can you prove to me you're actually saying something? Can you prove to me that I exist? Have a shitty life. I'm just saying, if humans came from monkeys, why are there still monkeys? You can't have an atmosphere next to a vacuum. The Big Bang violates the second law of thermodynamics. Everything that's created requires a creator. Show me curvature. There are no missing links.
Evolution has never been observed. The earth is only 6,000 years old.
>> [music]
Videos Relacionados
BSA Goldstar - I gave up! And why animals beat humans!
thebingleywheeler
102 views•2026-05-31
The 'Islamic dilemma': Quran tells Christians to judge by the Gospel
canceledkings
1K views•2026-05-29
Seneca - Escape The Crowd, Find Your Inner Peace!
realfreewisdom
114 views•2026-05-29
Scholar Explains: WHAT IS A GNOSTIC?
fightbackpodcast
965 views•2026-05-31
Fulton Sheen: A Mente Tenta se Manter Jovem para não Sofrer com os Impactos do Tempo
SantoCotidiano-port
673 views•2026-05-29
Why Pure HEDONISM Is IRRATIONAL
qnaline
12K views•2026-05-31
When They Ignore You, Do This Instead | Stoicism
ZenithWisdom-e3k
615 views•2026-05-31
The fourth great humiliation. #jimmycarr #crowdwork #hecklers #standup
jimmycarr
576K views•2026-05-28











