IMPORTANT: Justice Jackson's DISSENT Could Be the Next Blueprint for Gun Control

In Wolford v. Lopez, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's dissent argues that Hawaii's private-property carry restrictions are fundamentally a property rights case, not a Second Amendment case, because the state merely changed the default rule for consent on private property from implied to express permission, which she contends was never part of the constitutional right to bear arms in the first place; this reasoning provides a roadmap for future gun control litigation by suggesting states can regulate firearms through property law without triggering constitutional scrutiny, as long as they don't directly burden the right to bear arms.