The US Supreme Court ruled unanimously that a Texas law banning guns from illegal drug users violates the Second Amendment, as drug users who are not charged with other crimes or using weapons under the influence retain their constitutional right to firearm ownership; however, the government retains authority to prosecute drug users who pose a danger, and the ruling specifically addresses current drug users rather than addicts.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Supreme Court sides with a Texas man who says it's not a crime for cannabis users to have guns
Added:US Supreme Court sides with a Texas man who says it's not a crime for cannabis users to have guns. From the Pepper Radio newsroom, we have this news from Washington.
The Supreme Court sided Thursday with a Texas cannabis user who wants to legally own a gun. The latest in line line of firearms cases from a court that is expanding gun rights in a unanimous decision. The justices ruled in favor of Ali Daniel Himani who argued that a law banning guns from anyone who uses drugs illegally violates the Second Amendment.
Himani was in charged with any other crimes or accused of using the weapon under the influence.
Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote the opinion saying the ruling limits but doesn't end the government's power to take guns from drug users.
The decision is a loss for President Donald Trump's Republican administration which had defended the 1968 law despite arguing against other gun restrictions.
The measure was also used in the case against Hunter Biden who was convicted in Wilmington, Delaware of buying a gun while addicted to cocaine in 2018. He was later pardoned by his father, then President Joe Biden, a Democrat. Someone addicted to a drug could still be prosecuted after Thursday's decision, Gorsuch wrote. We do not address efforts to ban addicts or those presently intoxicated from possessing a firearm, he wrote. Prosecutors could still charge a cannabis user if they had evidence to prove the person was dangerous.
It's the latest in a series of cases particularly firearm cases to reach the Supreme Court since a landmark ruling expanding gun rights in 2022 led to a wave of challenges around the country.
That's what we know for now. From the Pepper Dio newsroom, I'm David Moore.
Related Videos
JAMIA BA LLB 2026 Offline Mock Interview | Final Interview Round Preparation
MLSLAWACADEMY
104 views•2026-06-16
6/15/26 Lively v. Wayfarer - Full Settlement Agreement is now public
littlegirlattorney
11K views•2026-06-15
HOA Demolished My Yacht for “Unauthorized Docking” — Too Bad I Own the Entire Marina!
Pro-RevengeStories
423 views•2026-06-15
JACKSON KIHARA'S SECRET DEAL: The Deal That Brought Out Jackson Kihara From Jail | LifeLens TV
LifeLens254
5K views•2026-06-14
Guelph's New Renoviction By-Law Explained.
CallCodyRE
807 views•2026-06-14
SCOTUS Rules 9-0 on Gun Rights for Marijuana Users
TheReloadSite
164 views•2026-06-18
A Family Tradition of Federal Time
LoneWolfUsul
603 views•2026-06-14
YouTuber Alexander Zabel Jr arrested again near Nancy Guthrie’s home amid investigation disruption
StarBuzzHD
136 views•2026-06-15











