For a claim to be considered coherent, it must follow the fundamental laws of logic (law of non-contradiction, law of identity, and law of excluded middle); when introducing something incoherent that contradicts logical, philosophical, and scientific consensus, a greater body of evidence is required to support the claim, as mere assertion without evidence does not constitute a statement of truth.
Installez notre extension pour rechercher instantanément dans n'importe quelle vidéo
Can you prove God exists without logic? Hasan explains.Ajouté :
Coherent is something that follows the fundamental laws of logic, right? The law of non-contradiction, the law of identity, the law of excluded middle, yeah? So, for something to be classed as coherent, it needs to follow the laws of logic. So, the brother's saying that if you're introducing something that's incoherent, you're going against the logical, philosophical, scientific consensus, then that requires a greater body of evidence. You can't just state that there is this being, I believe it to be as such, therefore it's true, right? It's not a statement of truth.
Vidéos Similaires
The 'Islamic dilemma': Quran tells Christians to judge by the Gospel
canceledkings
1K views•2026-05-29
BSA Goldstar - I gave up! And why animals beat humans!
thebingleywheeler
102 views•2026-05-31
3 Dreams That Changed Philosophy Forever
mommyplus24
731 views•2026-05-31
don't put shein's responsibility onto individuals #shein #neoliberalism
ScintillaePod
231 views•2026-05-30
Seneca - Escape The Crowd, Find Your Inner Peace!
realfreewisdom
114 views•2026-05-29
Scholar Explains: WHAT IS A GNOSTIC?
fightbackpodcast
965 views•2026-05-31
Fulton Sheen: A Mente Tenta se Manter Jovem para não Sofrer com os Impactos do Tempo
SantoCotidiano-port
673 views•2026-05-29
When They Ignore You, Do This Instead | Stoicism
ZenithWisdom-e3k
615 views•2026-05-31
