Why global elites are frantic, panicked, and failing across the board - Alex Krainer

Hinzugefügt: 2026-06-01

[00:00:00]What we're experiencing in the world today is the conflict between two systems of governance. So it's it's two systems. It's not United States versus Iran or Ukraine versus Russia or NATO versus Russia and so forth. These are all uh different individual battlefields in this great conflict.

[00:00:24]Part of the rationale for this war, part of the agenda is to actually get rid of military-aged males in your own population. And they do this deliberately. What's necessary is our cooperation and compliance. Without that, nothing will work.

[00:00:41]Uh and so this is why they've they've started again these uh pandemic games, you know, the the scaremongering, oh virus, oh Ebola, and they will not stop.

[00:00:54]If we if we don't want our children to be sacrificed again in a contrived, needless wars, we're going to have to be active. We're going to have to uh actively oppose this system and defeat it. And you know, the first thing we have to reject is any kind of fear-mongering.

[00:01:16]>> Hello everyone. Thank you for joining me, Neil Oliver, once again on GBN News Originals. I am delighted to introduce my guest Alex Crraer, who is uh an analyst and commentator uh in the spheres of economics, finance, geopolitics.

[00:01:33]uh he has been and has experience of fund management and he researches European and world history enthusiastically as as so many of us do.

[00:01:43]Uh thanks for joining me once again sir.

[00:01:46]>> Thank you for the invite Neil. Always a pleasure to join you.

[00:01:51]>> Um oh yes I I love to see you there. Uh at the moment I don't know where to look. I don't know about you and I wonder if the confusion of so many places to which our attention might be directed isn't the point. Um, we've been invited to look all over the all over the place, the Middle East, in Russia, here at home for me in in the UK, what's happening with what I call the controlled demolition of the political class. I wonder where or what sequence of events you you are focusing your attention upon right now.

[00:02:26]Well, like everybody else, you know, I'm trying to make sense out of the world uh in in the middle of a hail storm of scops.

[00:02:38]Uh and what I find most helpful is to always keep in mind the the the 30,000 foot view, you know, the broadest possible context in which all these events are unfolding. And I think that the broadest possible context always brings us back to the hypothesis that what we're experience what we're experiencing in the world today is the conflict between two systems of governance. So it's it's two systems.

[00:03:08]It's not United States versus Iran or Ukraine versus Russia or NATO versus Russia and so forth. These are all uh different individual battlefields in this great conflict.

[00:03:24]And I I like to go back to something I I I heard from um from a friend of mine in Croatia who is a who is a military admiral and one of the most competent analysts of events in the world. Admiral Dom who said that this is the first total war total global war. So not World War II, World War I 4, a total global war because it penetrates all all spheres. It's not just military, geopolitical conflicts in different parts of the world. It's a it's economic, financial, and social.

[00:04:00]um you know getting rid of cows, forcing us to um subject our children to gender dysphoria, the censorship, the repression, the debanking and sanctioning of individuals and more. you know, the list is we're we're we're facing a thousand battles and uh it's all part of this great conflict because on the geopolitical sphere uh the empire which I don't even know how to call it, you know, Katherine Austin Fitz calls it Mr. Global.

[00:04:34]Uh I tend to think that it's the Anglo Zionist Empire that we're facing. uh they want to, you know, they've been obsessed for over a century with securing hegemony over the Eurasian landmass. So that predicates, you know, actual kinetic wars against Russia, against Iran. Ultimately, it's going to be against China if it if it uh continues. But then there's also war against uh the population of societies that are hosts to this empire which means that they are assaulting us with pandemics uh you know these data centers are probably part of the matrix.

[00:05:23]uh the censorship and everything that we're experienced which is rendering life difficult and and and uh risky um which we feel on our skins every day.

[00:05:36]But again, you know, in this hailtorm of disinformation and scops, it's very difficult to understand where the actual attack is coming from, who is the ultimate instigator of this war. And so given the big picture, the the the the broad context, I worked out that it's the it's the it's the global banking cartel who are behind all of these things.

[00:06:05]And then you know that's that's a very long story which you know you cannot cover in a in one conversation but the more we see the more apparent it gets.

[00:06:21]I look back at the 20th century. I was never a specialist. I'm an archaeologist if I'm anything. But in in in more recent years, I have obviously turned my attention as many of us have to to what happened in the last century. And you know, I look back at at World War I in terms of the uh canonical version of events. We're supposed to believe it happened. You know, who the who the who were the aggressors, who were the defenders of liberty. then a 20-year hiatus and the continuation of the hostilities with World War II. Again, we've all been most people could probably write down on the back of an envelope who were the goodies and who are the baddies and why the war started and and and what were the consequences of its end. and then through the cold war and and then through much more recent US NATO foreign policy from from the 1980s onwards and so on and so on and there's a canonical version of events but I don't think it takes really any level of sophistication just the determination to read a bit to understand that there are so so many other ways of interpreting that sequence of events and in many ways there are alternative sequences of events that taking your you know many tens of thousands of feet helicopter view make more sense. So when you say it's a story that takes too long for a single conversation I'm right in thinking am I that you know we don't live in a a goldfish bull this 5 minutes that the only hope of comprehending it is not just to take a geographical wide view but to contemplate that this has been unfolding across centuries.

[00:08:09]>> Yes. Uh indeed uh once we start to examine events with a with a more critical eye, we realize that a lot of what we've been told does just doesn't make sense. You know, you mentioned World War I. Um, we've all been sold the story that, you know, uh, a Serbian radical Gabriel Princip shot Archduke, Austrian Arduk France Ferdinand, and then everybody just went crazy and the war erupted all across Europe out of the blue.

[00:08:53]M >> I think that we kind of swallowed the story because you know you had to pass your history exams and that that was the right answer and so you just okay whatever and you move on. But I think that everybody understands like how does that how does that make any sense at all? And now thankfully, you know, the the historians have dug into the materials with a critical eye and we we understand that this war was prepared for a very very long time um over a decade. That its intent was to destroy Germany and to cut Russia down to size, to destroy Imperial Russia. On the back of it, we got the Bolevik Revolution, which we were led to understand was an uprising of the working class against the oppression of the decadentsist regime. None of that was true either.

[00:09:51]And then, you know, we roll around to the 1930s and we get the emergence of Adolf Hitler and a Nazi Germany, which also just happened out of the clear blue skies. the old Germans just went insane and they decided to go to war against everybody else. Well, there's always a there's always a common denominator to all these events and we can even see it in the postw World War II uh order because you know while the west enjoyed a period of peace, the rest of the world didn't. They never did. And all the wars that have been fought international, you know, globally were fought again for similar reasons. And we find that one nation has been the initiator of more than 80% of all international wars in this period between 1946 and today. And that one nation is the United States. And you know, Great Britain has been also present uh with more than 80 wars uh that they either participated in or or directly instigated.

[00:11:07]And so you have you have to ask yourself why are are the British and American people, you know, very warlike? Do they do they enjoy sending their men to battlefields all over the world blowing up people and getting blown up in turn or is there some moving principles principle that is behind all this and of course there is a moving principle behind all this because you know the American people without fail vote for anti-war candidates which is which is a normal human thing to do you know we for for ordinary people who end up serving in these in these military misadventures.

[00:11:49]There's nothing to gain there. They are torn away from their families and from their businesses and from their jobs.

[00:11:56]They're sent somewhere to, you know, occupy muddy trenches. And the best they can get out of it is to just simply come back home in one piece. That's all they can get out of it. So obviously the the popular sentiment is anti-war and so people always vote for anti-war candidates. Same thing in Britain, but they always get more war. Which then leads you to ask, well, you know, these liberal democracies, what are they really? You know, do do they do they function at all as advertised or is it is it all a big hoax?

[00:12:33]because everything we desire, everything we would vote for can never be had.

[00:12:39]>> Hello, I'm Bev Turner. Now, it can feel like the money in our bank accounts at the moment does not keep up with the cost of living. And maybe there's a solution. I'm here today with the CEO of Tally Money, uh, Cameron Perry. Cameron, what is Tally Money? Well, Bev, with Tally Money, you get a current account and a debit card, but instead of pounds, you use milligrams of gold as your everyday money.

[00:13:05]>> So, why gold?

[00:13:07]>> Gold traditionally is a great store of value. It has on average gone up at over 11% peranom for the last 25 years against the pound. It's tripled in value in the last decade. And in the last 2 years alone, it's increased by 50% against the pound. banks, savings products just can't compete with that level of growth.

[00:13:28]>> But this isn't just about gold. This is about a currency that you guys have created at Tally Money. Explain it to me as though I'm an idiot.

[00:13:36]>> So, look, people need to be able to hold their earnings and build their savings in a money that retains its value and remains in their legal control and remains theirs to access away from government control.

[00:13:47]>> Great. You had me not exposed to government control.

[00:13:50]>> You should feel safe and happy with your money. You should have peace of mind the more money you see in your bank balance and that's the type of thing we're trying to deliver and give people choice in the type of money they get to use every day.

[00:14:02]>> Brilliant. Thank you so much Cameron.

[00:14:04]Thank you.

[00:14:14]You mentioned, Alex, you mentioned you mentioned earlier you well, you use the the word scops, which you know, I'm I'm very I'm very focused on uh because I've spent a lot of time contemplating what happened uh in the aftermath of of the first world war as people came to terms, the kind of people you're talking about, the regular people who want peace, how they came to terms with it.

[00:14:41]In Britain, there was a massive uh effort to raise the war memorials such that 40,000 war memorials were raised around the country. Every village, every town, every city. Uh but the the the the terrible irony in a sense is that in every instance it was the local communities that paid for, raised money for, commissioned artists and saw to the in the installation of these memorials, which I I I look back now and I think, God, the the the the money power and and those that instigated the war, they even left the people to raise their own gravestones over their own dead. You know, the bodies weren't repatriated. They weren't the millions of British, they were left in France and it was too far away in the 1920s for most people to go and visit.

[00:15:35]So, they couldn't. And the government actually left the people to raise their own gravestones over their own dead, which in many ways when you talk about a scop, it looks like just yet another act of cynicism.

[00:15:47]Yes, your sons and your brothers and your husbands are dead and their bodies are lie in mutilated mutilated mass graves far away. And if you want to remember them, well, you can raise your own crosses.

[00:16:01]>> Yes, it's uh it's it's profoundly ugly.

[00:16:05]And you know uh part of the part of the rationale for this war, part of the agenda is to actually get rid of military-aged males in your own population. And they do this deliberately. It's one of those big lies that people are people find very difficult to believe because oh but no they wouldn't do that you know they need manpower they need you know for the economy for blah blah blah. But if you look at the evidence you you know like for example World War I um the the celebrated theme of the World War I is the incompetence of generals you know which resulted in thousands hundreds of thousands millions of needless de death deaths you know like Gallipoli and then you know if you read conventional history they tell you oh well yeah because all the generals were you know trained um on old types of battles. And now in World War I, there was there was some air force and there were machine guns and they didn't appreciate this.

[00:17:15]So they send these waves of in infantry across the no man's land where they just got got slaughtered. But then the truth is if you if you look closely is that much of this was very probably done deliberately. You know, one of the one of the famous example was General Sir Douglas Hey, right? And uh he was he probably has the deaths of about two million Britons on his on his hands.

[00:17:47]And so all this was chocked up as mistakes, incompetence, you know, maybe overzealousness, whatever. But never never ever uh malign intent, you know.

[00:18:00]And then they and then they'll give you the quips of never ascribe to malice what you can explain by incompetence. I would invert it. Never never explain by incompetence what you can uh ascribe to malice. Because as it turns out, Douglas Heg knew perfectly what he was doing. He studied machine guns in militarymies.

[00:18:23]He waged wars in Africa. I think he was, if I remember correctly, he was uh he was part of the bore wars and other other wars against native in which he himself personally witnessed the effect of machine guns on on infantry. So he knew what he was doing. Nevertheless, he kept sending these waves upon waves upon waves of men across no man's land where they would just get slaughtered in their thousands.

[00:18:55]And he kept doing it and the high command kept sending him uh from one battlefield to another where he did exactly the same thing. And then if you if you see the result, there's this famous photograph of uh one town in England where they have um a big photograph of a of a regiment before the war and you see a large regiment I I don't know like several hundred or several thousand men in the photograph and then after the war the same regiment with showing just the survivors where where you just see a few dozen men.

[00:19:34]Why why would they do this? Well, because you know wars usually tend to escalate as social pressures build up in a society because of the polarization of wealth. Uh meaning that the ordinary people find it harder and harder to make a living. And so for the for the ruling class, the risk is that these men might rise up, stage a revolution or a civil war or something and that they might overturn the the the ruling regime. So the military-aged males are the the biggest source of risk to the established order. So, you know, whenever that happens, the the people in power will cry barbarians at the gate and then they will send men to fight.

[00:20:24]And uh yeah, go ahead, please.

[00:20:27]>> I I just listening to what you're saying. I think we are living through a a a different moment.

[00:20:38]I think there was a succession of broadly speaking repeating events for the same reasons as you've just outlined over overpresence a prepoundonderance of fighting age men you know let's mow the grass and so on. But what we're seeing at the moment which which seems paradoxical in a sense is on the one hand we're being told that with the rise of artificial intelligence that you you know which comes with the apparent necessity to invest trillions of everybody's dollars and pounds in yuans in in the creation of the data centers that will that will make all of that possible. But we're being told that AI will will uh negate the need for people to work.

[00:21:23]uh and and and yet at the same time we're being presented in in the West with an enemy in the form of Russia and the M music all the time is that even though the same artificial intelligence and the same data centers can take care of war with drones and and smart bombs and all of the rest of it without the need for boots on the ground. We're being told paradoxically at the same time that whole nations need to get ready to mobilize to fight Russia.

[00:21:56]And too many people I would suggest are seeing the paradox. You know, on the one hand, you're telling us that AI can do everything and that people aren't necessary. But for some reason, the fighting age men once again are required as boots on the ground for kinetic war where a moment's contemplation tells a rational person that that will only result in those people being turned into pink mist. you know, wherever they are deployed on any battlefield.

[00:22:20]And I I've I've wondered also if you previously through industrial revolutions and the technological advances the the these um elites that you're talking about shadowy in the background, they did however reluctantly need millions of people to get the work done. But now they don't need the work done anymore because they've got their data centers and they've got the robots and they've got their AI, but they still need rid of the people once and for all.

[00:22:46]>> Once and for all. They need rid of the people.

[00:22:49]>> They need to be rid of the people.

[00:22:50]That's right. Uh but you know there there's a there's a few elements in their equations that are that are completely wrong. So if we talk about data centers and AI um there's going to be all kinds of problem with this and you know AI uh has generated a lot of hype and much of that hype doesn't correspond to reality meaning you know AI is without question it's a revolutionary technology it's very useful it's it can do stuff but it also it's also subject to very deeply ingrained flaws. It will never uh live up to natural uh intelligence. So we will always need um I think I think they're going to be it AI probably in its current form is going to be a useful tool for human users. You know it'll make it'll make us uh more productive in some ways.

[00:23:54]you know to me uh you know in conducting research it's very helpful because you know if I want to find out a fact uh I used to have to do searches and then read a whole bunch of documents and maybe it would take me a few hour few hours to get to a fact now I ask a question in normal language and I get the answer in a few seconds so that's great I like that >> if that answer's correct >> there's a lot of trust involved in whether you get the response you get from AI is it correct? I mean you you have to make an assumption.

[00:24:29]>> Yes. If you're asking controversial questions then you have to be very careful and you have to maybe insist on controversial answers uh and you can get to them but the the the first thing is going the first thing you get is going to be the conventional answer. So it's it's just going to be based on conventional literature and uh you know if you ask it how did World War I start, it'll spit out the same answer that you you learned in school. But in terms of non-conventional answers, you know, like if you want to if you want to ask um when when was the artist armistice signed at the end of World War I? Boom.

[00:25:10]You get it like that, right? And so >> you have to be careful in how to use it, you know, like I I think that AI like like many things is like you get a tool like let's say you get a car. Yes, it'll take you from place A to place B. Yes, it has this amazing amazing technology under the hood. It works, but you can also get killed if you if you don't know how to how to use it. Now when it comes to control of society um what's necessary is our cooperation and compliance. Without that nothing will work. Uh and so this is why they've they've started again these uh pandemic games you know the the scaremongering oh virus. Oh Ebola and they will not stop you know 100% they will not stop. they will continue uh with this because that they need to induce fear in the population in order to make us willing to um give up our liberties uh to comply with their measures whether it's uh being penned in 15minute cities uh whether it's complying with lockdowns whether with it's with accepting vaccine mandates and vaccine passports and so forth you know The WH uh the the EU the EU has developed this um administration matrix for vaccine passports.

[00:26:42]you know the the whole big infrastructure where you know if you present your phone with a QR code it scans it and then it says stop or go and then you can enter a plane or a train or a restaurant and whatever you know it's a it's like the the the system of permits to do whatever and so uh they built out this infrastructure and then the whole CO 19 project fell apart and it went into disuse but the infrastructure and the and the and the software is still there.

[00:27:17]And uh I think in 2023 or or maybe yeah in 2023 the WH partnered with the European Union with the European Commission and they adopted this European system and they built a a global WH uh permitting system. Now, you know, if nobody if nobody accepts lockdowns, vaccinations, and and these these uh permits, then the whole system is for nothing. And how are they going to get us to to accept it? By by scaring the living daylights out of us to say, "Oh my god, we're in danger. We need the WH to protect us. We're going to comply with all their measures." And Pronto, the next thing you know is is people are going around with their phones. uh which you know eventually they will uh be um you know it's not going to be phones anymore because you can leave your phone behind. You can leave it at home and go about your life but once it's underneath your skin then you cannot leave it behind. So all that is being built all of that is being prepared and uh this is why we're getting all these all these uh pandemic scares again and we're going to continue getting the pandemic scares. I you know the hent virus story it dissipated seemingly um but it's not the first one you know we had the monkey pox virus in 23 that was declared as a international as a as a public health emergency of international concern which is the you know the highest level uh emergency on WH's um scheme Um and then that didn't catch on and then they declared that there was this disease X and you know there was a disease X X act passed. It wasn't passed it was introduced in Congress in 20123.

[00:29:12]Thankfully it didn't pass. Then the the in 24 um the Davos WH WF World Economic Forum discussed disease X at their at their gathering. uh in 2024 then in the UK the you know the the genius genius is important down started developing a vaccine against an unknown pathogen I don't know how that works but I'm not a I'm not a I'm not an expert right and then that that all kind of came apart and then again in August of 2024 they tried with monkey pox once more nothing much happened but then interestingly uh you know In um September of 25, Ursula Vandonderan gave her State of the European Union speech to the European Parliament in which she made said one sentence and she said, "We are on the verge, if not at the beginning of a new public health emergency."

[00:30:23]And she just left it at that. There was no further clarification like what the hell is going on? Are we in danger?

[00:30:29]Should there be measures? You know what is the public? They just left it at that and nothing happened. But it was like an indication. It's like okay. So they seem to be talking about this. Then two months later in November we had uh the Baroness Heather Hellet publish her 1500page inquiry into COVID 19 uh lockdowns.

[00:30:53]And it wasn't what you think it was. It wasn't the the the the subject of the inquiry wasn't who should spend the rest of their years in prison for for the train wreck that it was. It was why did it fail and how can we get it right the next time? And basically the conclusion was that next time we have to be more rigorous and less hesitant. We need to protect people much harder.

[00:31:21]And so then you thought, okay, what is this all about? You know, why why why this inquiry? Why did it come out?

[00:31:29]What's the point? A week after her her inquiry comes out, maybe 10 days, we get the new bird flu scare. And so that story goes into the media and they they try to hype it, but it dies after a few days. And now we have Havirus.

[00:31:50]Hent virus story seems to be dead, but I don't think it is because right now as we speak, Neil, the people who were sent to their isolation and quarantines in about a dozen countries around the world, they're still there because remember they told us it has a 6 weeks incubation period and it has 40 to 50% mortality rate which means that in another two weeks Maybe this story might start to come out again and they might start reporting like, "Oh my god, all these people in in in in quarantines, they're starting to die and they're going to start again announcing more deaths from Hanta virus and oh my god, it escaped. It escaped. It's it's out there."

[00:32:41]Uh, and so I think that that's coming because they they cannot give up on this because this is part of the agenda to get us into a totalitarian matrix. And speaking of totalitarian matrix, the the uh this whole thing with pandemics is not a new thing. It's um it has a it has a long track record in history. And there's a there there's an empirical um scientific paper about this that was published in 2013 in the public public library of science.

[00:33:19]And the what the researchers did is they looked at 90 different um cultures communities where they had two two types of data for that community. a the prevalence of um uh infectious disease and the prevalence of totalitarian government governance and they found that the correlation between the two was 73%.

[00:33:47]And 73% in social sciences practically doesn't exist. It's it's such a high correlation it's absolutely stunning.

[00:33:54]It's it's higher than the correlation between IQ and test scores. Okay, which means that prevalence of pandemics of infectious diseases and totalitarians to totalitarian governance just basically go hand in hand like a like a handing glove.

[00:34:15]And it follows that if you wanted to introduce totalitarianism on a global scale, the perfect the practically the means that imposes itself is pandemics of infectious diseases. So they're doing it. It's real and they're not going to give up. But what they need for it to stick is fear.

[00:34:42]we need to be afraid in order for us to voluntarily give up our liberties and to comply with whatever they have in store for us. So, you know, our fear is their most powerful weapon and this is where the whole thing fails.

[00:35:01]interesting to contemplate that um a pandemic so-called might be regarded or interpreted as a symptom of incipient totalitarianism.

[00:35:14]>> It might be the one the one might be the precursor of the other.

[00:35:19]>> If you've got a pandemic, you've got if you've got a pand if you're diagnosed with a pandemic, it's a symptom of the underlying disease >> which is totalitarianism.

[00:35:28]>> Yes. Yes. Exactly.

[00:35:30]>> When I listen to you every time I listen to you um you know you you know you're describing SCOS uh you're you're describing you know this increasingly visible and ridiculous apparent blatant uh scheming in in in pursuit of the application of control and it it often makes me think of the original Terminator movie you know where the where the where the where the Schwarzenegger you know cyborg turns up and to begin with is to be mistaken for a human being because he's covered in flesh and he he puts on the biker's clothes and he operates more or less if you're not looking too closely as a human being.

[00:36:12]But progressively his un his underlying metal structure is exposed until eventually by the climax of the movie all of the all of the artifice has been burnt off of him and he is just a robot unmistakably a a lethal you know killing emotionless robot >> and that's what it feels like as we watch these people now and I would say that a a very suspicious exposure of underlying you know robotic structure is when we have to watch what's happening with uh Donald Trump's White House that's becoming increasingly naked robotics.

[00:36:52]What was what was once at a casual glance to be overlooked as just people now looks like something else. It's becoming more and more inexplicable if you if you've been taking for granted that you know just the presence of normal people. you know, the psychopathy that that must the anti-human nature of the wouldbe totalitarians is now as exposed as as the Terminator. I would say you might not be able to defeat it, but at least you can see it for what it is.

[00:37:22]Uh, yes, correct. But I think that you can also defeat it and and I think there's no question that it will be defeated because we're you're we're not the first generation of humanity that's that's cursed with an oligarchy that wants to have total control. And the more the more that total control slips away from them, the more aggressive they become. And then the more aggressive they become, the more the mask slips off. And I think that's a good thing because people start to recognize, you know, it wasn't like a few years ago. I was the lonely loony conspiracy theorist and particularly, you know, the liberal educated type would just chuckle and and feel sorry for me because I've I've gone off the deep end. Well, that that's changed radically and now people are paying uh much much closer attention and they are willing to engage in much more substantive discussions about what's going on.

[00:38:27]And you know the the the gift we got from God as humanity is that we do have a certain intelligence and intuition that you know once we start paying attention we are very very difficult to fool.

[00:38:42]And so I I think that this is why, you know, they they could only ambush us with the pandemic once and then they kept trying, you know, monkey pox and disease X and Marberg virus and then monkey pox again and now antivirus again and then Ebola again and nothing is sticking. It's it's it's all just kind of, you know, if you if you pay attention to the to the daily news in the in the mainstream media. Uh they they do their job as they did with the pandemic. You know, they take it all very serious and everything that comes from the World Health Organization and official sources. It's all like, you know, it's terrible stuff going on out there. You know, we must be scared. But then if you if you go and see how these news are treated in the social media, it's very hard to find anybody who's taking it seriously. But it's easy to find tens of thousands of people who are taking the piss out of it. You know, the who are making jokes out of it. You know, once people start to joke about the the the pronouncements and declarations from official circles, you know that the game is up.

[00:39:51]Well, if I could also bring your attention to a a specific an aspect of of what's going on that I I would like your assessment of what's happening in the almost to be forgotten war in Ukraine.

[00:40:07]What do you how do you assess the situation there? Could Vladimir Putin finish it? Would he be inclined so to do? Will he do that? There's been reports very recently of Orishnik hypersonic missiles having been having been deployed by Russia against Ukraine.

[00:40:27]Um I know it's you know we've been talking about all these different nodes of the same underlying uh campaign against us by them against us. What what do you think is about to happen in Ukraine for example?

[00:40:47]I I wouldn't dare to make a prediction because it it it would be very hard to make one confidently.

[00:40:57]But uh first whether Vladimir Putin can finish this war, absolutely they can. I mean the reason why this war has taken so long is because the Russians have deliberately uh taken the the approach that seeks to minimize damage.

[00:41:15]So you know for them this is very delicate because they consider uh they consider the Ukrainians or at least most of them to be the same people.

[00:41:28]And you know the Russians are thinking in in long historical cycles and they know that you know these people will have to be reintegrated into a into some future society. Uh and they don't want hatred for Russia to take root. Like I I I'm I'm a Croatian, you know, and I can tell you that things that have happened 80 years ago uh in the Balkans are still fuel for hatreds that that are marginal, but they can be inflamed. They can easily be inflamed and they have been inflamed like in the 90s when the war erupted you know they started suddenly the mainstream media well that was the only media at the time they the media started digging up uh things from history uh and what Crowats did to did to Serbs and what the Serbs did to Croats and and and and the and the Muslims and vice versa. And it it started to it started to generate fear of the other.

[00:42:37]And so, you know, then the Serbs in Croatia who are who used to be a very very considerable minority, they started to they started to barricade their villages. They started to forbid uh Croatian troops or police to to enter their villages. And that that's how the the conflict started again. And that can be done again.

[00:42:59]uh but I think even even there a a certain awareness is is has come in that you know the instigation of war came from outside because people don't have naturally a hatred and and if you go there today uh people will tell you no this will never happen no way we're going to go to war because nobody wants it. Well, you know, if you go back to 2014 to Ukraine, even if you go back to January of 2022, uh, nobody in Ukraine wanted war. And you know, there were even there were even, uh, polls among Ukrainians literally two or three weeks before the war started asking if Russia invaded, would you be willing to defend it with with weapons, with arms? Would you join the military? and 1616% of people said yes.

[00:43:53]That's a very very low number. People were not interested. Nevertheless, fast forward four years, um something like 1.7 million men have been maimed or killed in Ukraine fighting this war. So you know the the high cabal that does this sort sort of social engineering uh can engineer future wars. They know they they believe that they can and uh they will proceed to do everything they can to make sure that the wars happen.

[00:44:30]And we can see you know you just have to listen to European leaders a little bit.

[00:44:34]you know, the fact that Russia has these arrestics and 6,000 nuclear warheads doesn't even make it into the equation.

[00:44:41]They want this war. And then, you know, like the the the head of the French army a few months ago was telling French people, uh, guess what? You're going to have to sacrifice your children because we're going to war.

[00:44:54]And so, this is being done. Uh, if we if we don't want our children to be sacrificed again in a contrived needless wars.

[00:45:08]We're going to have to be active. We're going to have to uh actively oppose this system and defeat it. And you know, the first thing we have to reject is any kind of fear-mongering. We simply have to reject fear because again, whether it's fear of viruses or whether it's fear of Russians, it's always the same thing. You know, once you're afraid of of of an outside enemy, whether it's very small or invisible or whether it's very large and and visible, it's what it's that what moves people to change their behaviors and to say, "Okay, well, I wasn't willing to sacrifice my children before, but okay, obviously now things are so terrible.

[00:45:52]Uh, I'm going to encourage my kids to go to war, or if they decide to go to war, I'm not going to oppose them. I'm going to, you know, wish them well." uh as things stand, we're not there yet, but that they will continue trying. And you know, one of the one of the things that is in their way is exactly social media where we get to have these kinds of conversation, which is why they want to eliminate this and they want to introduce systems that will keep us off social media or to keep us so compliant that we don't dare say what we what we want to say.

[00:46:30]One last question, Alex. It's It's a big question, but um as as part of the um I think under I've been talking about underlying we've both been talking about underlying motivation, underlying intent. Uh and on a on a certain level, it's been quite straightforward. You know, it's the it's the perpetuation of power. you know, maybe handing it from one iteration to another iteration, but it's the same power and it's the same people. Uh I I always think and I you know, you I I consider you first and foremost to be a financial/economics analyst, you know, uh maybe, you know, that's your deepest roots. I'd like to hear your latest assessment of you know the global financial economic picture because I I feel it's increasingly apparent that the money power and without them without the what they've always had which is the ability to create out of nothing and then to control the flow of the medium of exchange that's what enables the cabal to do what it does and I I feel I've always felt that they face an existential threat there's something that's challenging them that they can't they can't get hold of far less eliminate. What's your what's your assessment?

[00:47:55]Uh okay. So the west is in a lot of trouble. We the and the the the big problem for them is the is the uh overhang of unpayable debts and that's going to cause a a massive financial crisis. Now, what could you do to avert the massive financial crisis?

[00:48:21]You need a new credit impulse.

[00:48:24]But in order to make that credit impulse even possible, you need collateral. You need a lot of collateral.

[00:48:33]And um it doesn't exist in western economies anymore.

[00:48:39]And so what you need is you need to get political control of resourcerich regions of the world. And you know if we talk about Ukraine the the whole of the country let's say even the donust in in that package it's an estimated 12 trillion worth of collateral.

[00:48:59]Um the uh Iran is the fifth richest nation in the world in terms of natural resource wealth estimated at about $30 trillion. Russia is number one at between 75 and 90 trillion dollars worth of collateral.

[00:49:16]So if you took political control of those nations, which you know in Ukraine they did, they put Zalinski in power.

[00:49:25]Zalinsky will sign whatever you want him to sign, right? But the the Russians and the and the Iranians are much more selfish. They they're not going to let us have their resources. So you need to you need to regime change them. You need to bring some new Boris Yeltson into Kremlin. You need to bring Shah Resa Baklavi or or or Huangaido whoever. And what happens then is that you know you have it's it's not just natural resource wealth. It's it's it's the it's the companies that exist in those countries that are generally uh they'll tend to be profitable companies with very low debt.

[00:50:06]And so once you get control of those companies and that happens by let's say entities like Black Rockck who will come in with investment capital and they will buy up controlling shares of key of key companies in these countries and then once they do that they will put their their own people in their boards of directors. And so now a profitable company in in with low debt can be loaded up with debt to their eyeballs and in servicing their those debts uh the money will flow to whoever credited them, right? Which will be the Western Wall Street, City of London uh and and so forth uh money center banks. And so now that creates a flow of wealth financialized from any such colonized country to western financial centers. Now that flow of money is new new collateral because now you can on the base of those flows of money you can issue new debt. Um, and then that kind of uh allows them to kick the can down the road very considerably, maybe for decades, which is which is which is actually where the obsession with controlling the Eurasian landmass comes from. that that is the ultimate reason why they need political control over uh Ukraine and Iran and Iraq and Russia and China and Bellarus and Kazakhstan and whoever because then they plug it into their mechanisms for wealth extraction. It it it creates like this great big conveyor belt that takes wealth out of a country or a region and brings it to the financial centers in the west. And the result is that the local population which exists there just as as slave labor or very very low paid labor, their standards of living go to to the ground.

[00:52:17]um when you when they staged a coup in in Ukraine and and Ukraine has been laboring under the dictat of uh of uh IMF and World Bank since 1991.

[00:52:30]Uh the average salary in Ukraine was uh about $131 a month average and you know some people made a lot of money. So that average is actually even let's say the medium would be way way less than that.

[00:52:49]Before Vladimir Putin came to power in Russia, the average salary in Russia was $56 a month.

[00:52:56]And so this would happen to any country that got um subordinated to this system of governance. Remember, we're always talking about uh the systems that are the conflict that's that's that's rooted in the systems. And so, you know, the western system that is trying to impose itself worldwide and on its own domestic population is basically a system of wealth wealth extraction. And then the wealth is extracted to what we could call Epstein class today.

[00:53:28]And so we would we would end up living in a dystopian world that I think that even Aldis Huxley and and and George Orwell didn't even imagine in their full in their full uh ugliness.

[00:53:47]you know, in the list of, you know, resource for rich places, I'm I'm thinking about you, well, the Dead Sea in Palestine, which I believe has uncounted trillions of mineral wealth within it, not least potach, which is essential for fertilizer, but trillions and and it most of it's in the negative, which was why Count Fabernadot was assassinated by the Stern gang in in Israel in 1948, because he had had the temerity to suggest that the Palestinian ians should retain the negative and that would have that would have meant that the Palestinians held the majority of the the untapped wealth had been identified in the 19th century I think by a German geologist. I mean you know that's why the you know Britain and France and the rest of them wanted in there because of they knew they knew that that that piggy bank was there and they could break it open. But so with all of that and and you know all of these resource which which explains what they go the truffles that these that these monsters go sniffing around in search of I I think that this time because of the way in which the Terminator has been exposed that it it's that's why it's failing isn't it? That's why it's becoming increasingly frantic and increasingly ridiculous and impossible to interpret using any of the metrics that we have internalized, you know, for the last lifetime. What we're seeing now is the is craziness because it is craziness.

[00:55:10]>> Yeah, exactly. Uh look, they are they're failing across the board and they're failing with with an almost complete consistency. you know, they're um they had they had a number of uh critically important projects that were meant to change the situation in their favor. The uh well, in just the last few years, we had the pandemic that was supposed to usher in a new normal that would bring uh the populations in most of the world under their complete control.

[00:55:45]that that and basically disintegrated.

[00:55:50]Then the next big project was Russia.

[00:55:53]So this this proxy war against Russia through Ukraine was supposed to um basically lead to a regime change and uh then putting somebody else in the Kremlin uh and not Vladimir Putin. That failed.

[00:56:13]uh third project that was meant to happen was a regime change in Iran that failed and so um and that's that's the major big ones then there's a lot of small ones that failed as well you know like um for example Hollywood Hollywood was supposed to be our aspir you know aspirational mecca so they started encouraging all these Hollywood stars to have um trans children to raise their boys as girls and girls as boys and we're supposed to all go like, "Oh, I just I want to be just like Chariss Theron. That's so progressive and so wonderful." The whole gender dystopia um project has also failed. And and there's more. And so I think this is why they're frantic. This is why they're panic. This is why they're demanding uh uh uh heavy-handed censorship.

[00:57:13]But it's it's it's extremely difficult.

[00:57:16]It's very very difficult. And I think that the future, so what I think it will happen is that once Ukraine is defeated, once there's a regime change in Kiev, uh then all these all these governments in in the UK, in Paris, in uh Berlin are going to start to fall and then it's going to be the struggle for political power at home.

[00:57:48]uh which will lead into a reign of terror because they will not be able to pre prevail at the ballot. So what they're doing going to be doing instead you're going to have people falling out of their balconies and and uh let's say the the leaders of a real opposition are going to be attacked, imprisoned, killed and so forth. And that's going to go for a little while until there's a total civil war and then you know there's there's a total war against the against the ruling elites and that you know God knows it's a quite a prognosis uh Alex and but it's one that I that I agree with. Um you know we've we've arrived at the same destination. I've taken up exactly twice as much of your time today as I as I had promised, for which I I can only apologize, but I I feel Oh, >> don't apologize. It's all good, Neil.

[00:58:52]It's a pleasure. And uh >> hopefully hopefully this shines a small light in u in the hailtorm of SCOPS.

[00:59:02]A little bit of clarity maybe.

[00:59:04]>> Preach. Preach, brother.

[00:59:08]Thank you so much for that this morning, Alex. And uh >> thank you, Neil. Always good to join you and have a good rest of the week. Warm greetings to all the audience.

[00:59:18]>> Thanks, Alex. We'll talk again soon.

[00:59:19]Thank you. Bye-bye.