UNWINEWITHTEDDY | DForDefianceOverRuled — Court Documents

Added: 2026-06-02

[00:00:01]Good evening and welcome back. It's 10:30 exactly on May 27th. I'm Teddy and this is Analyze this mess. So, come on and grab some coffee, tea, water. I've got my Gatorade here, maybe wine for those that like to sip on it. Shout out to the mom. All my other bears I call the grizzlies and the honey bears.

[00:00:28]Please hit the like on your way in and join me. So, we're going to catch up on a uh court docket that came in today in my case and tell you about that. Then we will get into perhaps some other things um as uh time goes by. I see my moderators, Baby Guju, and uh yes, follow me on all social media as well. Let's see. Okay, we've got a few folks. There you are, baby Juju. I I can see you on my screen. There you are.

[00:01:13]Was trying to put it up. Follow Unwind Teddy on station head at D for Danielle or Unwind Teddy. Haven't been over there on Unwind with Teddy in a while, but we're going to get back there. Hey, Jennifer, good evening. And Vicki, I see you, too. Ivy, I also see you. Okay, let's just get to this.

[00:01:40]Uh, see which screen I want to pull up first.

[00:01:47]Um, all right. So, you saw the title here.

[00:01:52]It's um D for defiance overruled mob grizzlies honey bears. Yes.

[00:02:01]Tonight's analyze this mess. That's what it's called. And no, this is not one of those nights where I'm going to come on here and say I won the whole case while throwing legal papers into the air. No, that's not what this is tonight. This is not what happened.

[00:02:21]What happened tonight is something much more important procedurally. Judge Levy overruled the objections, the defendants's objections to the show cause.

[00:02:39]And let me repeat that carefully. The objections to the show cause order were overruled. And the reason that this matters is because the court specifically stated that the prior disclosure orders remain in full force and effect. The court also stated that the defendant did not comply with those orders and the court rejected the argument that disagreement with the court's ruling justified ignoring them. Okay, let's pause for just a second. I got it.

[00:03:33]Fair use commentary. As always, this broadcast is for education, criticism, news reporting, and entertainment purposes only because this case has evolved into something much bigger than, you know, this internet commentary and live stream arguments.

[00:04:00]This case has become about compliance, anonymity, jurisdiction, discovery, court authority, and whether federal court orders actually mean anything once they are entered.

[00:04:25]And tonight, Judge Levy drew a line between disagreement and compliance that matters because according to the court, you can disagree with an order, you can object to an order, you can appeal an order, but That does not mean you get to simply ignore the order while continuing to litigate the case. And that's exactly why tonight's ruling matters. Now, I already know what the comments are going to say, even though I'm not looking at them.

[00:05:22]Teddy, does this mean contempt?

[00:05:27]Does this mean discovery?

[00:05:31]Is Danielle about to be forced to Can she still file motions?

[00:05:41]Is the case over? Is this the end?

[00:05:47]Slow down.

[00:05:50]Federal court is not tick tock. Okay.

[00:05:56]Things happen in stages.

[00:05:59]Courts usually escalate gradually.

[00:06:07]First comes orders.

[00:06:10]The then non-compliance, then show cause, then objections, now rulings, and then potentially enforcement or sanctions if non-compliance continues.

[00:06:30]What happened tonight is that the court addressed the objections directly and overruled them. The court did not dismiss the case tonight, vacate any disclosure orders, block further filings, or even halt the procedural posture of this case.

[00:07:02]Instead, the court reaffirmed that the orders remain active.

[00:07:11]That's important.

[00:07:13]And honestly, this is exactly why I've stopped just sitting around endlessly looking at a couple of things that maybe well I haven't shared with you, you know, like trying to predict every possible future. future scenario.

[00:07:46]No, at some point this case has got to move forward.

[00:07:55]I have to move forward.

[00:07:58]Things continue.

[00:08:00]And the court identified a specific deficiency.

[00:08:08]Okay, I'll tell you about that maybe sometime in the future.

[00:08:19]But where things stand, not everybody pretends that secretly they know every future move before it happens.

[00:08:37]Although there's been some kind of signaling out there.

[00:08:45]Not going to say too much on that. And let me say something else carefully.

[00:08:54]Tonight I could speculate on some type of mysterious I'll just call it strategy that has been you know like signaling something out there or even every uh live stream statement that people want me to try and decode, you know, like searching in the treasure maps or something like that. Although I like maps. All right.

[00:09:49]And there are some things I am looking for no doubt.

[00:09:56]But what matters right now is the actual docket, the actual orders, the actual filings because unlike live stream, you know, these narratives, federal courts leave written records.

[00:10:17]And tonight that written record says the objections were overruled.

[00:10:26]Now, can additional motions still be filed?

[00:10:32]I think so.

[00:10:35]Yes.

[00:10:40]Federal litigation is um you know it's like this environment where everyone continues filing motions until the case resolves or it's just overloaded, you know. But the important thing again tonight is this.

[00:11:03]The court is still actively managing this case procedurally.

[00:11:11]The court did not walk away from it. The court did not say that the disclosure orders disappear.

[00:11:22]No.

[00:11:23]Didn't say that non-compliance no longer exists or even matters.

[00:11:33]The court addressed it directly.

[00:11:38]And tomorrow, tomorrow I move forward.

[00:12:22]finger.

[00:12:43]Finger finger.

[00:12:49]Super heat.

[00:13:34]All right. So, let's just read this six pages.

[00:13:38]This is the order. Overruling defendants objections 152 Evans versus Robertson Judith El Levy is the United States District Judge along with magistrate judge Elizabeth A.

[00:13:57]Stafford order overruling defendants objections before the court is defendant Daniel Robertson's objections to magistrate judge's order ECF number 152.

[00:14:16]defendant asked the court to set aside the magistrate judge's order compelling identity disclosure ECF number 144 page ID 3435 defendant appears to reference magistrate judge Elizabeth A Stafford's March 3rd 2026 order requiring defendant to show cause by March 24th, 2026.

[00:14:50]Why she should not be held in contempt and sanctioned for her defiance of the undersigned orders to disclose her legal name and postal addresses or address.

[00:15:08]Um, Daniel Robertson is apparently defendant's alias and not her true name.

[00:15:19]If you notice that this court has continuously put that on the record.

[00:15:27]All right, let's go to this second page.

[00:15:32]For the reasons set forth below, defendants objections are overruled.

[00:15:39]Legal standard federal rule of civil procedure 72 presides that for nonispositive or dispositive pre-trial matters where a magistrate judge issues a written order.

[00:15:58]And by the way, I noticed my comments are not on the screen.

[00:16:05]That way I can look at them. Hang on.

[00:16:10]Clock is spinning there.

[00:16:18]A party may serve and file objections to the order within 14 days after being served with a copy. A party may not assign as error a defect in the order not timely objected to. The district judge in the case must consider timely objections and modify or set aside any part of the order that is clearly erroneous or is contrary to law.

[00:16:57]Federal R Civil P72A the district or eastern district. Let me just turn these screens. I'm looking to the site. My apologies. Let's see if I can move this.

[00:17:21]The District of Michigan local rules state that objections under rule 72 must a specify the part of the order to which a person objects and b state the basis for objections edish LR721D.

[00:17:44]This standard requires the district court to review findings of fact for clear error and to review matters of law denovo.

[00:17:58]And she makes reference to this basic time Warner Cable Inc. versus that.

[00:18:07]Let's go down. A factual finding is clearly erroneous when although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.

[00:18:33]that states versus US gypson. An order is contrary to the law when it fails to apply or misapplies relevant statutes, case law, or rules of procedure analysis.

[00:18:54]On March 3rd, 2026, Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford issued an order requiring defendant to show cause by March 24th, 2026. Why defendant should not be held in contempt and sanction for her defiance of the undersigned orders to disclose her legal name and postal address, ECF number 144.

[00:19:29]As with her motion to stay, Judge Stafford order to show cause.

[00:19:37]Defendant interprets Judge Stafford's order as requiring defendant to disclose her identity and claims that requiring her disclo her to disclose her identity would create harm that is permanent and irreversible. ECF number 152, page ID 3425.

[00:20:05]But defendant, as with her motion to stay, misunderstands Judge Stafford's order to show cause.

[00:20:16]Judge Stafford's March 3rd, 2026 order did not order defendant to disclose her legal name and postal address.

[00:20:28]It ordered defendant to show cause why defendant should not be held in contempt and sanction for her repeated failure to follow the undersigned orders.

[00:20:46]Other orders in this case required defendant to disclose her legal name and postal address ECF numbers 118 and 124 and they remain in full force and effect as set forth in Judge Stafford's order to show cause.

[00:21:11]Judge Levy twice ordered Robertson to disclose her identity and Robertson defied both orders.

[00:21:24]ECF number 118 ECF number 124.

[00:21:31]Although Robertson moved for reconsideration of the first order, Judge Levy struck that motion because it contained a factitious citation ECF number 121, ECF number 124.

[00:21:49]Robertson thus did not properly appeal Judge Levy's orders and instead chose not to comply.

[00:22:08]ECF number 144, page ID 329 through 3210.

[00:22:18]And as explained in Judge Stafford's order, a party's disagreement with a court order is not an excuse to disobey it.

[00:22:32]Page ID 3212.

[00:22:36]Defendant's objections repeat her arguments that disclosing her legal name and postal address would violate the law or cause her harm. ECF number 152.

[00:22:56]She also claims that she acted in good faith, has not defied or disregarded this court's authority at any stage of these proceedings, and has consistently appeared, responded, and sought judicial review of orders she believes implicate significant constitutional concerns.

[00:23:30]Hang on.

[00:23:40]It has a footnote.

[00:23:42]These arguments are unavailing.

[00:23:52]She's been arguing and arguing.

[00:23:56]unavailing.

[00:24:00]It is undisputed that the court ordered defendant to reveal her identity on December 4th, 2025, ECF number 118, and December 29th, ECF number 124.

[00:24:21]and defendant did not comply with those orders. As such, defendants objections do not demonstrate that Judge Stafford's order to show cause is contrary to the law or clearly erroneous. Defendants objections are overruled. ECF number 152. It is so ordered. dated May 26, Ann Arbor, Michigan, signed Judith Elbe, United States District Judge. The footnote, defendant also argues that revealing her identity would be inappropriate because plaintiff has not successfully served her. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, ECF number 152, page ID 3433.

[00:25:28]See, she's still arguing service.

[00:25:32]Yeah, just recently.

[00:25:37]But plaintiff's failure to serve. This is what she's saying. This in hers defendant is due to defendants's own unwillingness to reveal her identity despite numerous court orders.

[00:26:07]How can you serve an anonymous person who has been evading service for more than a year now five months? So 17 months maybe.

[00:26:32]And she says that she has been what? What was this back here?

[00:27:01]That she's acted in good faith.

[00:27:05]All right.

[00:27:10]As set forth numerous times by Judge Stafford and the undersigned, Robertson may not use her anonymity simultaneously as a shield to protect her privacy and as a sword to undermine the litigation.

[00:27:35]ECF number 144, page ID 327, quoting ECF number 74, page ID 778, overruled.

[00:28:05]So, what's going to be the next step?

[00:28:17]She's defiant.

[00:28:20]The court has said it.

[00:28:23]She's non-compliant.

[00:28:25]The court has said it.

[00:28:30]She appears to have no intention on complying with the court. The order is still in force.

[00:28:42]It's still there.

[00:28:45]She's not compliant.

[00:28:48]And still before the court are the court's options. They move at their pace.

[00:28:57]But it's become more than apparent.

[00:29:03]It seems that the court's language is being more exacting like defiance, non-compliance that I'm just okay.

[00:29:41]Wait a minute.

[00:29:46]that she's going to, you know, argue and keep on arguing and keep on filing motion after motion, arguing, you know, about, you know, the First Amendment, her rights and privacy. Y and causing harm. And if you would see the argument that she put forth before this ruling, I'm not going to read it here tonight, but it was what, at least 20 pages.

[00:30:41]And she continues to try to persuade the court that revealing her identity is going to suddenly and she's pointing to me.

[00:31:02]All right. It's going to bring some harm to her.

[00:31:10]You're not persuading the judge. And she argued about this one time the judge talked about multiple, you know, videos that I've made.

[00:31:32]She called it a fixation once.

[00:31:37]But have you looked at Daniel Robertson's first filing?

[00:31:44]She started planting that very seed from the beginning. And she has talked about it numerous times until finally it seemed that one picked that one word picked up and she keeps going on with it because the court mentioned it one time back in September.

[00:32:09]And she tried to argue that again and the court did just did not know overruled especially can let's see I had to you know I filed too let's see it's 11 o'clock because I want to get into something else maybe.

[00:32:42]Where's my here? Let me just I'm going to show you what I filed.

[00:33:09]as an opposition to um Robertson's objection.

[00:33:21]Just want to show you a couple of lines.

[00:33:29]I say here it was like only 10 pages.

[00:33:33]Second, defendant has not demonstrated irreputable harm.

[00:33:40]Any claimed harm is speculative, particularly where defendant failed to timely raise or properly preserve those arguments.

[00:33:53]Defendant's own public statements made during the pendency of this act of litigation. while she remains non-compliant with the court's disclosure orders, further undermine any claim of irreputable harm. in a live stream broadcast on or about April 11th, 2026, shortly after the court issued its order to show cause ECF number 144, defendant stated in substance, "Until you know my name and my address and who I am and you got some money from me, you haven't won She further declared, "I'm a bee in real life." So, if you think that online Danny Robertson is a problem understanding my real life, I'm just I'm still the same me, the same person.

[00:35:06]These public remarks stand in stark contrast to any assertions presented to the court that disclosure of her identity would cause irreputable harm or that anonymity serves as a necessary constitutional protection. Instead, they demonstrate that defendant views anonymity as a strategic litigation advantage that materially influences her conduct and approach toward others.

[00:35:48]This inconsistency weighs heavily against granting a stay and supports enforcement of the court's prior orders requiring disclosure.

[00:36:02]Third, a stay would prejudice plaintiff by delaying enforcement of court orders and prolonging defendants non-compliance.

[00:36:15]Finally, granting a stay would undermine judicial efficiency and reward delay.

[00:36:24]Courts do not grant stays merely because a party prefers not to comply with existing orders.

[00:36:37]Recent rulings in related litigation are instructive regarding defendants claims of irreputable harm and anonymity.

[00:36:48]While not binding on this court, recent rulings in Smith v. Robertson case number 224 CV 12213 Ed Mish are instructive in evaluating defendants assertions of irreputable harm and her claimed entitlement to avoid in-person participation or disclosure obligations.

[00:37:22]In that case, defendant raised materially similar arguments asserting that in-person participation or disclosure would result in irrepitable harm due to her claim first amendment right to anonymity.

[00:37:42]Again, this was filed before her hearing where she was supposed, you know, could show in person.

[00:37:52]April 14th.

[00:38:10]The court rejected those arguments and exercise its discretion to require in-person proceedings, emphasizing that a litigant may not dictate the manner in which judicial proceedings are conducted.

[00:38:32]The court further denied defendants's motion for reconsideration, reaffirming that no error existed in requiring in-person participation and noting that defendants preferences do not override the court's authority to manage its proceedings.

[00:38:56]These rulings are consistent with the broader principle that participation in litigation carries procedural obligations that cannot be selectively avoided through assertions of anonymity.

[00:39:15]While courts may consider anonymity in appropriate circumstances, such considerations do not confer a unilateral right to control the manner of participation or delay compliance with courtordered obligations.

[00:39:38]Accordingly, defendants's assertions of irreputable harm in this case are undermined by her own litigation posture in related proceedings and by court's consistent rejection of materially similar arguments.

[00:40:06]I said I wasn't going to read a whole argument.

[00:40:14]Here's something also.

[00:40:20]Defendants reliance on potential changes in the case posture, including pending recommendations regarding certain claims. does not relieve her of this obligation.

[00:40:38]So what the defendant was arguing I haven't showed you in 152 is that the report and recommendation those rulings on those objections have not been made and that the case might be dismissed on the last claim.

[00:41:01]And so I'm arguing here more nor does existing or existence of potential third-party information sources such as LERA or other regulatory records substitute for compliance with a direct court order requiring disclosure.

[00:41:25]It's because in her ECF 152, she contacted Lara and filed uh a foyer request for records. I want you to see what she requested. All right. in this. She has yet. I have not heard whether or not she has received any records, but she is saying to the court in numerous filings that I, as the plaintiff, have been hiding information about the allegations to Lara and that Lara has disclosed that information to me and I'm not sharing it with the court and because of that she's saying allegedly that I'm not sharing. It's not true, but I'm just saying what in my own words that I have not been sharing and that it's a strategy not to share basically because if the court doesn't know what Lara has alleged, then that will open up discovery and Lara and others can be subpoenaed.

[00:43:04]that opens up discovery. So what she has done is contacted Lara.

[00:43:10]All right.

[00:43:12]And you know what? Let's let's do this.

[00:43:18]There there are so many filings I just have not shared with you. Um, but let's pull out her 152 and the exhibit so that I can show you.

[00:43:37]>> Let's just pull this up.

[00:43:43]Why not?

[00:43:57]She has a lot of arguments.

[00:44:09]The court didn't to no avail.

[00:44:26]No.

[00:44:39]Since we're talking about Lara, let's go to page 18, section seven of her argument objection.

[00:44:52]The remaining defamation claim cannot support compelled disclosure.

[00:45:01]Okay. So, yes, I filed a motion to compel more than once. I did.

[00:45:11]And now the court has overruled.

[00:45:16]They still want her, the defendant, to disclose her identity. And so she put this forth.

[00:45:26]Even if jurisdiction were assumed, that would be diversity.

[00:45:34]The sole remaining state law claim cannot support compelled disclosure because plaintiff has not established a primapacia case under governing law.

[00:45:50]Many courts require such a showing before unmasking an anonymous speaker. Then she sites case the record reflects questioning or questions regarding plaintiff's current professional activity and status at the time of alleged statements.

[00:46:16]While lure may exist, it does not necessarily establish active practice or the context in which the statements would be understood.

[00:46:33]At minimum, these issues raise factual or legal questions regarding falsity which weigh against compelled disclosure at this stage.

[00:46:46]Moreover, the alleged statements arise from reporting and petitioning activity directed to a regulatory body and are protected by both qualified privilege and statutory immunity.

[00:47:04]So again, she's trying to argue that if she contacted regulatory bodies that she's she's privileged, qualified privilege and has statutory immunity these records.

[00:47:27]Okay.

[00:47:28]At minimum, the claim appears insufficient to satisfy a primapacious showing required for compelled disclosure at this stage.

[00:47:42]So a different angle, another approach to try to stop, you know, unmasking her identity. She uses unmasking. That's what it would be.

[00:47:59]Identity, you know, identity. The court wants her identity.

[00:48:06]They do >> and she's holding on to that so that this case can, you know, continue to be stalled.

[00:48:21]One of the reasons I should say then she says because the remaining claim survives only through inference rather than a clearly pleaded and attributable false statement.

[00:48:46]It cannot support compelled disclosure under any recognized unmasking standard.

[00:48:55]That's her words. That's her argument, part of her argument.

[00:49:07]Plaintiff's filing disclaims the inference under lying the remaining claim. The magistrate judge's recommendation allowing the remaining claim to proceed appears to rely at least in part on an inference that defendant reported or accused plaintiff of medical malpractice to Lara.

[00:49:35]So again, I'm not here to I'm not going to argue all of this because I'm not going to show my hand and I'm and The objections have been filed to the court and the RNR report and recommendation by the magistrate judge is before Judge Levy who just overruled today the defendants objections here that I'm showing you part of to remain or you know compel her identity. But the court the court asked the defendant or ordered the defendant to identify her legal name and her postal address and to show cause. Why she shouldn't be held in contempt and sanction for defying the court.

[00:50:51]Instead, she did not answer that question, that order to show cause. She continued to argue why her identity should not be disclosed and put forth more arguments about Lara and about irrepitable harm.

[00:51:21]yet.

[00:51:23]I I just have to I just Okay, I'm just All right. When I think about When I think about it, I just have to breathe because there's something else going on.

[00:51:46]There is Then she says, "However, in plaintiff's most recent filing, plaintiff expressly disclaims that any allegation of malpractice was reported. I did not You know what? I'm not going to argue this. I'm not in my initial complaint. There is one more than one place where the word malpractice and that's not what this case is about.

[00:52:29]She is trying to take one thing and put it before the court and hang on something like that and make an argument so that it tries to I just have to wait.

[00:53:00]And then on top of that, try to present to the court that I'm not being honest about Lara and them communicating and or have that I know basically what she said in so many words is that I know what's in those 200 100 plus pages and more 10 times filed. I do not know that. I'm going to say you can play it for the court because you're saying it to the court.

[00:53:46]She's saying I'm hiding stuff from the court.

[00:53:55]You are hiding your identity from the court. She said it today.

[00:54:02]Uh overruled defiance and non-compliance.

[00:54:10]That's what she said. But she did say other things before this ruling too to support it.

[00:54:19]Instead, she No, she's not looking at that.

[00:54:24]She's coming up with a different, you know, more this remaining claim. And I don't know what's going to happen. She doesn't want this to get to discovery and she doesn't want to be unmasked.

[00:54:41]But look at what she asks for for Larry. She can ask what she want. I mean, it's public some of it, but some is not. I don't know what they have sent her, if any. They haven't sent me anything. And I put it on record and showed the court in my recent filing.

[00:55:07]Mhm. Because I had to answer to her objections and I did it with receipt.

[00:55:20]There is so much here.

[00:55:23]I'm just saying I'm not saying and this is just this is so involved because she still wants I'm going to say it. No, I'm not.

[00:55:41]Not now.

[00:55:44]It's 11:25.

[00:55:48]Nine. Compelled disclosure would cause irreversible harm.

[00:55:56]Once disclosed, defendants's identity cannot be restored to anonymity.

[00:56:03]This constitutes a permanent and irreversible loss of first amendment protection, distinguishing this case from ordinary discovery disputes and warranting careful review. Well, the court just reviewed this overrule disclosure would irreversibly destroy defendants anonymity.

[00:56:44]Once disclosed, the constitutional interests at stake cannot be restored.

[00:56:51]Defendant therefore sought to challenge the order before compliance in order to preserve constitutional protections.

[00:57:04]That has to be weighed as well.

[00:57:09]Defendants conduct does not constitute defiance. So, she's telling the court she's not defiant, but reflects a good faith effort to obtain judicial review before complying with an order that would cause irreversible constitutional harm. All right. So, the ruling has come in now.

[00:57:46]Are you going to comply?

[00:57:50]Are you going to obey the court order? The order is still in force.

[00:58:02]Are you going to give the court your legal name and postal address?

[00:58:11]good faith effort to obtain judicial review before. So the judicial review that part ruling has come in overruled where compliance would permanently esting extinguish a constitutional right. Courts recognize the need for careful review before enforcement.

[00:58:47]Defendants actions reflect preservation not disregard of judicial process.

[00:58:55]preservation, yes, uh is being used across, you know, different filings. And I'm not arguing a person doesn't have the right to, you know, due process.

[00:59:20]But as the court has said, can't use anonymity as a sword and a shield.

[00:59:32]Can't have it both ways.

[00:59:37]according to the the court and then she backed it up with an opinion and careful review.

[00:59:50]The complaint still names an alias rather than a legally identified party.

[01:00:00]Well, this is under 10.

[01:00:05]uh the procedural posture remains irregular.

[01:00:09]The order requiring identity disclosure effectively attempts to cure a service defect by compelling defendant to reveal identifying information.

[01:00:23]So she's well you heard with the court what I read last.

[01:00:31]the defendant.

[01:00:36]The defendant and let me just read that again at the end because I'm I'm I have to stick with what the court is saying.

[01:00:48]Defendant also argues that revealing her identity would be inappropriate because plaintiff has not successfully served her.

[01:01:02]But plaintiff failure to serve defendant is due to defendants's own unwillingness to reveal her identity despite numerous court orders.

[01:01:22]as set forth numerous times by Judge Stafford and the undersign Robertson may not use her anonymity simultaneously as a shield to protect her privacy and as a sword to undermine the litigation.

[01:01:51]And then she goes on in this. So I'm looking at, you know, on another screen.

[01:01:56]We could look at these side by side, but let me show you what she's up to or has been up to, I should say.

[01:02:15]On March 13th, um there's this Gmail foyer requests.

[01:02:22]It's fair foyer requests to some party there at Mish Lara the center. It was Monday, March 9th.

[01:02:36]Please respond above this line.

[01:02:43]So Larara responds. She doesn't show but Larara responding.

[01:02:49]State of Michigan says March 9th regarding public records request of March 3rd. In reference, they write, "Dear requesttor, this notice responds to your March 3rd, 2026 requests for records received by the Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs." Lara Lara has processed your requests under the provisions of Michigan Freedom of Information Act, FOYA.

[01:03:26]your requested or you requested the following. In summary, pursuant to Michigan Freedom of Information Act, I respectfully request copies of public records relating to licency, my name, my licency number, profession, physician, assistant for the time period January 1st of 2022 through December 31st, 202. 24.

[01:04:02]I request a complete complaint and enforcement history reflecting all complaint record numbers, dates complaints were received, current status in review, closed, dismissed, referred for formal complaint, dates of closure if applicable, reason for closure or disposition, i.e. or eg dismissed, insufficient evidence, compliance conference, formal complaint issued, summary, suspension, etc. Copy of any summary of allegations issued to the lency during this period.

[01:04:51]Copy of any notice of investigation.

[01:04:56]Notice of formal complaint.

[01:05:03]Administrative complaint.

[01:05:06]Compliance conference notice.

[01:05:09]Cease and desist order.

[01:05:13]Summary suspension. Final order.

[01:05:17]Disciplinary subcommittee determination.

[01:05:21]Identification of whether any complaint from 2022 through 2024 remains pending. Has been referred to a hearing before an administrative law judge. Is currently under disciplinary subcommittee review. Is subject to judicial review in circuit court or appallet court.

[01:05:51]if any requests. Let's see.

[01:05:56]That's something about the law. Uh the state Michigan under these MLC statutes.

[01:06:09]If any request is denied in whole or in part, please site the specific statutory exemption relied upon.

[01:06:20]I request that responsive records be provided electronically in PDF format.

[01:06:27]If fees will exceed $200, please provide me an itemized estimate prior to processing. Thank you for your attention to this request. Your request is granted. The estimated cost of continuing to process your request is $57.

[01:06:49]Please refer to the attached detailed itemization form for a breakdown of fees. Then it gives these fees.

[01:07:05]Let me see. I haven't looked at everything.

[01:07:16]I've told you I don't I haven't read all of this stuff.

[01:07:22]Did I put this up? Yeah.

[01:08:07]it.

[01:08:09]I didn't want to show this person's name. I guess someone at and Lara, someone at the office of Lara, you know, that's just responding to fees, how to pay online check and so forth.

[01:08:27]All right.

[01:08:28]So, I read you there in its totality as far as you know what she's asking.

[01:08:38]Okay, let me go back to my fireplace.

[01:08:43]I thought I was going to, but you know. Oh well.

[01:08:54]Let me put this back up.

[01:09:00]Come on.

[01:09:05]Trying to remove this. Hang on.

[01:09:33]That was another cover page that I use sometimes.

[01:09:45]All right.

[01:09:47]Now that I have it in front of me, I'm just waiting for it to slide back over.

[01:09:51]There we go. So I can see it and see your comments.

[01:10:06]Sorry, it's spinning. So, it's just taking a moment now. I don't see.

[01:10:25]There we keep going away.

[01:10:30]There we go.

[01:10:36]Why aren't people talking about this case?

[01:10:42]Why is this not you know this is a real case whether no matter what happens?

[01:10:53]This is a very involved case having to do now with my medical license and things that I don't know about.

[01:11:07]I have I don't know. I don't know what she's received. I don't know what she's holding back. But I do know that she knows what she filed and what the other party filed to the licensing board. I don't know.

[01:11:28]All right. I don't I haven't seen those records.

[01:11:36]And Lara sent me a response back to my foyer that I couldn't get the records.

[01:11:50]So, if she has some records, maybe she's holding on to something. Maybe she's going to show something.

[01:12:05]You know what?

[01:12:08]I can't wait if this if you got something. You got something because she's she's I can't say too much.

[01:12:35]I better not say anything.

[01:12:42]Because this individual, I will say, she said, "I'm calculated."

[01:12:48]She said, "I'm methodical."

[01:12:51]She said she plans. Mhm. She says she has a strategy.

[01:12:58]She says she always wins and never loses.

[01:13:02]And who going to check her boo?

[01:13:06]And right now she's evading the court and she's trying to convince the court that she hasn't been served and the reasons are lawful and she's trying to put that back up in front of the court to say, you know, you can't even go forward. I haven't been served.

[01:13:33]You see, this is a different pathway than what the other case took. She didn't respond to that case until after.

[01:13:44]Okay.

[01:13:46]And default.

[01:13:49]It was ruled there. She didn't even co show up for the hearing. Okay. In my case, it's motion after motion. And you see, even we're not in discovery yet.

[01:14:11]And she, you saw it, I read it. She doesn't want this case to be open to discovery.

[01:14:19]And now she's saying that I'm hiding things in order to get it open to discovery. Basically, I'm just saying in my own words, my understanding.

[01:14:32]Mhm.

[01:14:36]And as she's saying, I'm falsifying things.

[01:14:42]This is beyond I can't say too much.

[01:15:04]I can't. Yes. Just focus. It's like just I don't know what's going to happen in you know how the court's going to rule.

[01:15:23]I'm I I just I can't I just need to be I'm patient in the court is, you know, going through this, you know, step by step.

[01:15:41]And how we're going to get there, how we're going to get there. It doesn't seem like we're going to get there.

[01:15:49]Should this move forward, we're not going to get there because the defendant is going to, you know, reveal her identity. She's saying, you know, go through this, you know, and in good faith, you know, before I'm you compelled to do this. I'm It's not that I'm trying to be, you know, defiant.

[01:16:20]I just want to make sure that everything has been looked at.

[01:16:27]And after the court looks at everything, guess what? I think just based on what I'm seeing in the just in the appeal, you know, just kind of how things move and it'll just be more of the same if she can. I think you know continuously putting something in front of the court or and a person has that right. I'm not that's not my argument.

[01:17:05]That isn't because I'm not making my argument here.

[01:17:11]I'm I showed you what my argument actually was.

[01:17:17]I read from it and showed you a part of my opposition to her objection and her objection was overruled today.

[01:17:35]So on the one hand, if you want to know what was that five that clock up there, well def for decision in the other case, uh Tuesday, $10,000.

[01:17:49]And so I've heard she's going to, you know, put the money up in a registry.

[01:18:00]I heard it. She said she's going to do it.

[01:18:07]So that in order to you know because she's already if if you've listened to anything she said that you know the plaintiff in the other case Miss Smith cannot now when she puts the money up the money's not there yet but she's planning to put it up and that will stop discovery on the part of Miss Smith until you know while the appeal process is going on. So, if she can lock lock that one down, but over here, she's trying to get this case thrown out because well, we we're on a different pathway where the next door will be discovery if we go through that door.

[01:19:16]So that's why she's like, "Dismiss, just get mine dismissed all together."

[01:19:26]And now this whole Lara because it's been part of the case.

[01:19:32]Right now it's the last claim remaining.

[01:19:38]Okay.

[01:19:41]So now she's arguing that I'm hiding things about Lara.

[01:19:50]I'm just putting it in, you know, my own words.

[01:19:57]I'm hiding things from the court.

[01:20:00]So she's going to do her foyer.

[01:20:06]Are you going to show the court?

[01:20:09]because I would love to see what you file.

[01:20:17]Is that gonna be Is that going to be it?

[01:20:21]Oh, is that going to be it? I don't even know. I'm thinking out loud like I can't think of every you know but like so you are you going to show the you going to show the records so that discovery doesn't have to open up in case is that what it is I mean I don't know I I I really Don't.

[01:21:02]Okay.

[01:21:04]I don't know.

[01:21:06]I don't know anything really.

[01:21:10]I just know they are absolutely out there planning their next move.

[01:21:18]Uhhuh.

[01:21:21]We we know that from way back. That's what she said years ago.

[01:21:30]Right. Let me read some of your comments and let's put up the fireplace.

[01:21:36]What you think? What do you think? Let me let me take um just a quick I need to take a quick break. Just a second.

[01:21:43]Where's my music?

[01:21:47]Heat. Heat. N.

[01:23:15]Hey.

[01:23:20]Hey.

[01:23:27]All right, I'm back.

[01:23:41]About a minute and a half, 2 minutes, I don't know. So, we've been on for an hour and 23 minutes and it's almost midnight. So, I think we're we're still pretty good. I mean, yeah. Get a sip of Gatorade. You know, I was sipping on some lemon. So, it's like, you know how that sour before coming on and lemon popsicles and that and you know that sourness like my boys, I shouldn't have done that. I should have done something different.

[01:24:16]Yeah.

[01:24:18]All right. Um, thank you. Yeah. Great job. Get your Gatorade. Yeah, I need it.

[01:24:24]I actually got some water. So, what do you think about all this? It's It's like And by the way, let's see. Where is it?

[01:24:43]just so you know because there's just so much has happened since what ECF 138 and that's the report and recommendation that was February the 9th there has not been a ruling on that yet you know because all of these objections have come in but what what she ruled on today is um you know was filed ECF 159 on the objection that was filed by defendant here 152 April the 3rd. All right. So she's ruled on that. She ruled on the 11th on 153 that on that stay that was denied.

[01:25:40]So these two together the objection from the defendant and the motion to stay.

[01:25:46]Now one overruled and the other motion to stay denied. Well all of these others you know objections and things.

[01:25:58]So, just so you know, there's there's a lot um upcoming still that we're waiting on, you know. I don't know.

[01:26:24]I don't know. It says if Lara gave her the information and you cannot get it ducttales mean right. I don't know. I have no I have my letter and I submitted it. You can you can go and and you know maybe we'll read some of my filings, but I showed proof that I you know that they denied me obtaining my own records because of privacy or whatever the you know unless it goes to uh I guess you know court subpoenas I can't say too much.

[01:27:06]But I didn't even get I didn't get that.

[01:27:10]So I don't know.

[01:27:14]That was last year.

[01:27:17]Remember when this case when she first Okay, this has been going on for a while. I've been trying.

[01:27:24]And then remember what the court ordered last summer? You see, we're back. This is May 27th.

[01:27:32]So sometime last summer, I'd have to look up the date, maybe June, July, the court, remember the court barred me from even filing any more motions for a period of time. All right. While I was barred, she was still filing things. Her and John do. All right.

[01:27:57]There are filings that I have not even responded to because the time just went into when I was barred.

[01:28:06]And then when it opened back up, she she made an order and I'd have to look at it that no more no discovery at all. nothing.

[01:28:26]And I had already tried to get this was before that the L um the information from Lara because complaints were still coming in.

[01:28:42]Yes, there have been at least 10 complaints.

[01:28:48]Mhm.

[01:28:53]filing and filing and filing and Lara they know about this.

[01:29:00]Sure they well they they you know they haven't taken my license. I know she wants to get that license and I will say it just like that.

[01:29:16]Mhm.

[01:29:18]She wants to get something on me.

[01:29:27]Something.

[01:29:28]Why do you think a protective or something she's trying to get filed in this court?

[01:29:36]Why do you think so many times she has filed protective orders or put things in the docket harm this that you know so it's a paper trail so it appears why do you think she dragged all these other content creators into my case?

[01:30:01]What did she send Lara? I don't know.

[01:30:09]I know I have a post that she sent, you know, I put, you know, in the file.

[01:30:14]She says she sent over 200 pages. So, what's in the 200 pages?

[01:30:22]There's probably a lot more that she sent. I don't know.

[01:30:26]What does she tell Lara?

[01:30:30]I would love to know.

[01:30:36]All right.

[01:30:38]So, the answer to that question, I don't know. Or you're just making a statement.

[01:30:47]Drop the ID so the people know it's real. That's right.

[01:30:55]And you know what's interesting, too? If I click on somebody who gives a comment, then their name or their quote or something might appear in the filing cuz she's watching right now.

[01:31:11]I don't care if she's I don't care if she was simultaneously uh broadcasting. She's watching, you know, recording or something.

[01:31:22]Someone's got eyes out there.

[01:31:32]overrule.

[01:31:40]I don't know.

[01:31:48]I don't know what they've given her. I don't know. That was just a letter to say if you you know that was just showing the requesttor you know if you do this this this and this that you've requested this information and some type of fee schedule.

[01:32:07]I never gotten anything like that.

[01:32:20]She pays for information.

[01:32:23]She pays to file. Oh, she's going to pay the 10,000. She says she's going to pay it. She's going to pay it because she doesn't want discovery on the other side.

[01:32:37]Uhhuh. She wants both doors closed.

[01:32:42]So she's she's she's already said she's going to pay that.

[01:32:49]So if she can get that door closed, she can remain anonymous.

[01:32:55]And if she can get my case dismissed, then she can remain anonymous and she can delay that on out and appeal because, you know, I would appeal.

[01:33:11]I'd have to, you know, decide on what grounds. So, just drag it out for years.

[01:33:17]Nobody, you know, look at my age. I want this resolved.

[01:33:28]Why does she plan to hide her an her anonymity? Sorry.

[01:33:34]This is what people need to think about.

[01:33:39]What's she hiding? What? Why is she evading the courts? The courts have said it. This is not me just, you know, saying it. It's It's on record.

[01:33:54]She says to the court, "Yeah, I I just have to Okay, breathe. I mean, I'm not I'm not angry. I'm not upset. I'm not any of that. It's just it's a process."

[01:34:09]And I just see how she moves.

[01:34:14]And it doesn't matter to her that the court has overruled. She's not going to give the court her name and address if she can help it. She's going to keep trying to figure out a way to delay it.

[01:34:42]Someone's going to this length to stay hiding tells you everything you need to know.

[01:34:51]I don't know. I don't want to allege anything. I haven't. She's listened to everything.

[01:34:58]I'm fair use commentary. I'm human. I'm reading the court's opinion basically in real time because I hadn't finished reading it and hadn't read, you know, so I'm naturally going to be like, "Oh, really? Oh, okay." You know, just a natural reaction or whatever.

[01:35:23]and also knowing that she went after my medical license.

[01:35:31]That part and enjoyed it while she was doing it before I filed my lawsuit.

[01:35:47]taunted me.

[01:35:57]Mhm.

[01:36:00]I'm not going to say more than that right now.

[01:36:05]Them layers can spin the block and turn against her. I don't know who these layers are, but if they're hiding, we we've got to get the court needs her name and her address. Okay. It's really that simple.

[01:36:26]Yeah. Overrule.

[01:36:33]They don't want that name out.

[01:36:40]You think she's using AI? Are you talking about? Did Okay. She doesn't work alone. I absolutely don't think she works alone now. Yeah.

[01:36:55]She said she has layers. So layers tells me you don't work alone alone. You can't have layers that are saying in her, you know, she said that if they find out, you know, approach whoever the layers are, they're going to deny her that they even know her.

[01:37:18]So, they would be in cahoots and working with her to cover her an anonymity up.

[01:37:25]You mean even if the court are they going to be forthcoming, if it gets to that part, are they going to hide, too?

[01:37:39]I don't want to get ahead of myself.

[01:37:42]We're not there yet.

[01:37:46]But she is absolutely hiding.

[01:37:49]Yes, she is hiding. You can call it hiding, evasion, not obeying the court, whatever, however you want to call it. It's all the same in my opinion. Especially with the court's ruling, you see the language defiant, non-compliant, evasion, not obeying.

[01:38:23]I don't know how you want to paint it.

[01:38:34]I don't know who April Wills is, but says, "Why is she so afraid? Is this another content creator under a troll?

[01:38:42]Something's not right." I have no idea.

[01:38:46]This is bigger. I think I have said there's going to be some surprises.

[01:38:53]Remember I said that? Maybe someone thinks they're going to surprise me.

[01:39:03]I don't know.

[01:39:07]But surprises. Somebody's Yeah, there's going to be surprises. I don't know.

[01:39:15]Maybe something that I'm not even aware of that you're aware of.

[01:39:22]That's why I say bigger than we even know. We might be surprised.

[01:39:32]Yeah.

[01:39:49]It doesn't make sense.

[01:39:59]Allegedly. Allegedly.

[01:40:02]I have to do things in the legal way.

[01:40:05]I'm doing things the legal way. I have a right to give commentary.

[01:40:12]Um I'm not somewhere, you know, uh lurking behind the shadows. I'm not going to do any harm to any person.

[01:40:25]I've taken an oath. That's not even in my nature. I'm 67 years old.

[01:40:33]I don't have a record.

[01:40:37]I'm not about to uh develop one now.

[01:40:42]No, I don't even want to do things that are like that.

[01:40:56]Doesn't even enter my mind.

[01:41:02]And she said she's going to control the narrative. That's right. So, I already understand that.

[01:41:10]But people who either follow her, which I don't want her followers, let's be clear on that. She has even said recently, I'll say recent to me could be in the last year that I wanted her followers.

[01:41:28]I don't want you keep your followers.

[01:41:33]I I don't want I No.

[01:41:40]I'm not trying to get someone's followers.

[01:41:51]No, that was not my goal. She said that that's what I wanted to do. I should clarify that that was my plan. No, it wasn't.

[01:42:15]You say, "I don't believe we will be surprised who this is." I said, "More than a year ago when this started, I said if it gets to that point, we're going to be surprised."

[01:42:28]I said, "We might be surprised." Yeah.

[01:42:31]MCL. Oh, no. It's just hard to believe.

[01:42:37]who this okay you say let me just read I don't believe we will be surprised who this is if you've been following this for years you're let's see you about know who this is why would you want her followers I don't know what a person has as their background. All right.

[01:43:14]All comments made are the opinions of others. And you know what? There might be people and trolls that come to the chat and they might put things in the chat to try to, you know, set me up, try to, you know, give her ammunition so she can make a copy and put it in my, you know, in the record for the court, you know, put it on the court record docu docket.

[01:43:45]So then it appears that I'm saying these things or support things. I don't.

[01:43:55]She did that with Dat. She did it with King World. I don't support that.

[01:44:04]I don't support any content creator who wants to do harm or to anyone.

[01:44:11]I wouldn't support that event. I wouldn't. So, stop trying to put that on me.

[01:44:23]But she's trying.

[01:44:27]That's why if you got something you sent to the board, please pull it out.

[01:44:47]Because all these folks anonymous, so we need to know who who if you're anonymous, how do I know that? How do you guys know if she pulls something out? It's her.

[01:45:03]You see how these anonymous people can work?

[01:45:07]I don't even know. Let's keep going down.

[01:45:15]Uh yeah, even the Pope is talking about AI.

[01:45:22]Melissa, 12:30 is my limit. Okay. No one wants her followers. Who would I don't?

[01:45:34]And they don't want me either. So, we're we're we're happy. We're both happy. All of it.

[01:45:41]They say I would put them to sleep.

[01:45:43]Yeah. So, they don't want me anyway.

[01:45:49]You rolling with DEA.

[01:45:55]Oh, well, DEA. Wow.

[01:45:59]She's I don't know who she is. The setup.

[01:46:07]She'd been running these plays for five years. I don't know.

[01:46:12]I know that.

[01:46:14]I don't believe it's just one person and that's not No, I don't believe that.

[01:46:22]No, I don't.

[01:46:24]You think Tulsa is trolling? Tulsa is a troll. She Tulsa and and the others.

[01:46:31]Yeah, they can troll. I don't But I don't see Tulsa.

[01:46:44]Yep.

[01:46:45]So, so you have the update and uh you got it from me.

[01:46:55]Nice and close to the mic.

[01:46:57]There it is. All right.

[01:47:08]What is this?

[01:47:20]Did you contact LRA and show them We're going to wait and we're going to see how this goes because I know they're waiting and everything I say, do you know you you've shown up before in my case, cups?

[01:48:07]So, if I answer any of your questions, she surely is going to put put it up.

[01:48:15]She's just waiting for the next opportunity. So, I don't know.

[01:48:21]I can't say I won't say so much right now.

[01:48:36]I don't know.

[01:48:39]I have no idea who people work for, who people work with. I'm looking at some comments. Um, I don't know if people work for YouTube that, you know, they could know I I don't know, law enforcement, um, any of that. They said that they are can investigate better than anyone else. Okay. So, all right.

[01:49:21]I do know that she can dox a person overnight.

[01:49:25]I've seen it.

[01:49:29]Yeah.

[01:49:33]And I do know that she somehow finds her way access to information that others seem to find it very difficult. I don't know what what she you know think about this all these people and she one person we still don't know her identity right but she can ducks she can ducks anyonehu how she do that I don't know she I wish I knew but I Oh yes, thank you. This is an active case.

[01:50:18]Please be mindful of what you say, myself included.

[01:50:25]I don't want to make any new allegations, bails, bond. You know, she's going to pay by Tuesday. watch and see that $10,000.

[01:50:41]It's going to roll in to the court, check, cashier's check or money order.

[01:50:55]Yeah.

[01:50:57]So for that other case, so she can, you know, she knows Yep. Is that it for me?

[01:51:14]The opinions of the chat are their own and their own thoughts. And yes, if we ever get to that point where we could play it back how many times I've said fair use, I've said it's the opinions of others. I've, you know, I clicked down and things got, you know, I I don't know.

[01:51:43]What is this? Melissa says a John Doe came out in the files.

[01:51:53]Definitely not one. You know, that's why they are John Doe's. I don't know what you're referring to, but John Jane placeholders one and the same, you know, Jane for female, John for male. That's the way you guess, you know, they traditionally out there.

[01:52:16]I've already put it on record that I don't believe I don't believe I don't believe anything that the defendant, you know, says without any receipts, any, you know, there's lots of things that have been said. I don't believe it.

[01:52:35]I don't have to believe it.

[01:52:40]So, I'm not saying anything that I haven't said before tonight, you know, about being surprised, you know, if I'm going to be surprised.

[01:52:49]I don't I've already said this.

[01:53:01]The the $10,000 goes into a registry. It doesn't go directly. It goes to the court and it remains with the court until the appeal process you know a ruling and if it is in the appellant's favor then you know that person will get it and the appell is Miss Smith. So you know plaintiff appell uh defendant appellant I think that's going to do it for me is 12 is close enough to 12 there. Yeah.

[01:53:51]Okay.

[01:53:52]All right.

[01:53:56]I've been busy today.

[01:54:00]Yeah. Beautiful day it was though. All right, biggest bear hugs go out to each of the grizzlies and the honey bears.

[01:54:06]Please hit the like on your way out and uh join me sometime tomorrow. But now it's time to say good night. Thanks for watching. Until next time, I'm Teddy.

[01:54:15]Good night.

[01:54:57]Heat. Heat. N.

[01:55:20]Hey, hey, hey.

[01:55:33]down.

[01:56:56]Heat. Heat.

[01:57:25]Heat. Hey, Heat.