Lazankis provides a sober, data-driven examination that prioritizes laboratory forensics over the typical sensationalism surrounding unidentified phenomena. His insistence on isotope testing demonstrates a commendable commitment to empirical rigor before jumping to exotic conclusions.
深掘り
前提条件
- データがありません。
次のステップ
- データがありません。
深掘り
Llanilar UAP Sample Review & Analysis | Orestis Lazankis追加:
Now I have one of these fragments, the sandwich fragments and I took them to the laboratory here in Greece and I am about to present some of my findings most of them and then I can give you my honest thoughts on what I believe might be the case with this object whatever it might be. So I called it hexagon because there is a difference between actual Roswell and and um the whales Roswell in that nobody saw that thing.
Nobody saw the object crashing or coming and going. So we don't know what it is or where it's gone and um or how much how big it was, how much damage it could sustain. So all we have is basically the story. And the story begins when a farmer here woke up one morning and found all these these pieces of metal in the fields around his farm.
He called the police believing there was a plane crash. They came to investigate and next thing we know, of course, the military was in the area and they were picking up the debris. They were doing this together with the police. And that's the first of the interesting parts is that they they seem to be overseen by some plainly clothed individuals.
You know, plainly clothed individuals overseeing military and police in picking up what could be a plane crash.
Like this is one of these instances that doesn't make a lot of sense if we consider a prosaic origin.
So Gary Rose team decided to visit the site and to go into the nearby forest believing they could find some of the materials in there. And they did. They discovered a few pieces compared to the four fields and a forest's worth of leftovers that the farmer saw. The farmer discovered. Now, together with those pieces, they also found this big corridor that was opened and was made up by broken trees and twigs. So, that's probably the direction that the craft took because you have a few pieces in the forest and this corridor and then lots and lots of pieces in the fields next to it. So, probably the craft came from the forest side and into the fields where it flew off.
Now, four kinds of metal were discovered on the fields and in the forest. One was the sandwich pattern, the the fragments with the honeycombs on one of its sides.
The other was a plate that was also hexagonal, seemed to be made by hexagonal rods or pillars. And then there was then there was a sheet metal, a plain sheet metal that was paper thin according to the the team paper thin and it could almost not be bent like you could only bend it with a lot a lot of force and then there was also a memory foil apparently. The last two of them ring a different bell. They remind us of the Roswell incident. But now we also have the hexagons.
Very interestingly in 2023 apparently someone was metal detecting the General Roswell area and discovered one of these honeycomb fragments. So we have evidence of similar technologies in the two incidents and that opens a a whole a whole other can of worms as you will see later on.
Now when the authorities apparently learned of the team's discovery, they reacted very strongly. They picked up the very forest and the the reason that was given was wind damage. According to the team, they spoke to the guys um doing the uprooting and they said that this is what I have to tell you. This is what I was told to tell you. I was told to tell you that it was wind damage.
So whatever. And on the next visit of the team to the site, even the soil was being taken. Now, there was a crash of a of an F-17 in Russia and there are pictures of it.
It is small compared to what it would take for four fields and a forest to be filled with debris. But then we don't know exactly how dense were these debris.
So it could be, but we'll see about that later. So three independent sources that I know of have tested these these fragments in addition to JRO and I this one of them was um was an Australian lab that identified the most of the elements and materials in that sample and that was a bare sheet of metal. It was not the honeycomb type. The honeycomb type was tested by Gary Rose team in some of their labs and a few comments that were made that were that no such air no aircraft could sustain so much damage and remain airborne. But then like JRO showed us, we have other planes flying with one wing. And sure the corridor which was about 20 ft in width corresponds to about the about the the width of a wing of an F17 or similar planes. So there's that but again like he said without pictures of the corridor and without u you know someone seeing in what angle or what kind of of aircraft hit the trees we cannot know more. Now, what's very interesting is that Muon also did an XRF, an X-ray test, and they said it was 94% lanthanum, and they even found zirconium in there and no aluminum. That's the that's the reverse, the upside down of what everyone else has found so far, but I would not be so quick to discard it because we see a huge emphasis on hexagons here. And sure enough, lanthanum has a hexagonal crystal structure at room temperature. So that's just something to keep in mind until we have some more evidence for that.
Speaking of evidence, Philip Mantle got a hold of one of these sandwich fragments and then he sent it to me.
This is the one. Now, the hexagons in my sample in this this little object are different than the ones that JRO showed you. These ones look apparently like melted or having been exposed to a high temperature.
And then you have the green layer on the other side. It looks black, but it is actually dark green. And at the top you can see a one part of it was chipped away and underneath that was a slot in the metallic regions that was a that was seemingly made to for the uh for the green layer to to go into. And you can you can even see a right angle. So this is a very you know humanl looking thing but we just don't know yet. Here is a closer up of the hexagons. You can see the cracks, probably a result of Gary Rose's attempt to crush the material.
And you can even see the fibers. If you look closely at the bottom side of this of the material, you can see those weird fibers sticking out. Now, I also you can also see a hole, a big hole towards the left of the sample. That hole is also hexagonal. I don't have a picture, but when we were uh turning this object under under an optical microscope and changing the perspective and the lighting, at some point the orientation and the lighting were just right and you could see that this hole was actually hexagonal, a smooth hexagonal hole.
So, even more hexagons.
This is the metal that you can see. It has two distinct regions, a clean one and a dirty one. The dirty one is, you know, has has some dark spots and the layer right beneath it is also very dark. And so you could, one could say that that the cutting tool dragged some of the um some of the material onto the metal. But from observing this third layer, it looks very brittle. Like I don't think that this layer could have been sort of applied like stick to the metal by the cutting instrument.
I just don't know. Here we can also see that this thin layer used to be part of a thicker one, a thicker layer, or maybe there was a sub layer underneath it. As you can see, it snapped probably during the crash or the hitting. I took these samples to the National Center for Scientific Research Democral analysis.
And I also cut a smaller piece and exposed the insides of each layer to have a better view of it to be able to more or less measure the size the the the thickness of each layer and to have an uncontaminated part that we can compare against the other EDS spectra that we would take. This is the first one. This is showing the gray layer as you can see the hexagons. There is also a part of it that is broken off, peeled off and you can see the inside of the layer. It is very porous. And this this will this will become relevant later because as we will see a lot of stealth materials are sandwiched, lightweight, porous.
And it curiously this layer is also made mostly out of aluminum. Even though it's gray, still a lot of aluminum. So, it's probably doped. Maybe it's a resin or a ceramic of some kind. And here you can see the the hexagonal hole. And I positioned it so that we could test the inside. And on the inside of that hole, we could find some elements that were not present in the rest of the layer.
Sodium and chlorine. Chlorine were found. So, salt of some kind if they are bonded together, which is interesting.
could be rainfall, could be anything, but there's that like we don't we don't find some of these elements at the rest on the rest of the layer. And here is one of those fibers that was sticking out. Now, this is only what's left of it. When we when we when we first found it with the electron beam, it was much more um it was much more textured and detailed. It had all these hooks and branches and things sticking out of it, but when we zoomed in, it shrunk a little. So, we just stopped immediately and zoomed out. So, maybe the electron beam destroyed some of its uh features, but you can still see them. You can still see see them. And it is coming out of the layer. It's not it's not between it is not sandwiched between the metal and the the gray layer. It's actually coming from holes inside from inside the gray layer, which is interesting. And it also has a lot of aluminum and iron, enough for the scanning electron microscope to detect it. So these are weird. These these fibers I don't know if if a stealth application could be for for them, but that's what we see. And this is the metal up close.
You can see the two regions. The dirty region is the one to the left. You can see the spectra. And the cleaner region to the right does not have all these other elements that will also be detected on the thinner layer.
And here is the clean in uncontaminated part of the small piece that I cut showing even fewer elements mostly aluminum not lanthanum not zirconium. We will have to see. We will have to see.
Maybe we should do an an even more sensitive test to settle the issue once and for all. If at least in this sample we could find any lanthanum or zirconium. We'll see. And this is the third layer, the thinner one. This is I believe the most interesting one because this is very thin but it has all these different elements at the top spectrum of the of the EDS.
You have you have the um the layer when viewed from perpendicularly perpendicularly from you and the the second spectra is from the clean part.
There is not a big difference between the two.
So this third layer contains so many different materials. You have manganesees, you have lead, you have aluminum, we have chromium, we have all these different elements that we don't find in the other ones.
I actually see a difference of density progressing inwards towards the thinner layer. So the outer layer is the is one of the thickest ones. It has a lot of aluminum but also some other lighter materials. Then if we move inwards we have basically mostly aluminum. So denser and after this denser layer is an even denser layer. This third thin layer with all these elements that are denser than aluminum. So density increases as we go inwards for whatever that's worth.
So this is probably what happened.
Maybe maybe an unknown aircraft, you know, was flying low, hit the trees, but then it kept going and scattered all this debris on the field and it was discovered the next day. Now the kind of worms that I was talking about uh earlier they we have so much material reportedly found in these fields yet not a single mechanical or functional part. No engines, no wires, no nothing, not even bolts or rivets. Like if such a big chunk of a human craft was scattered on on a field, you would expect to find one one bolt, one rivet, something or or a or or a or or a plate with holes for these rivets. But we do not find any such thing. Where we do find something obviously human is in the newspaper article. The newspaper articles claims that one of the pieces had a serial number on it. But when Gary's team askked the farmer about that, the farmer said this was not the case.
So, you know, the first the first time we hear the world hears about this incident is from that newspaper article and Gary's team arrives after the fact and after their search then the authorities decide to uproot the forest.
So if they scattered these pieces in at the at the site to be found later, why would they take the forest in the soil to remove all the all evidence? So and then what about the Roswell type materials? We have a memory foil. We have this sheet of metal that was also found in Roswell. And now the hexagons apparently as well. This is a big problem to be to be solved, you know, in the ufological world because if this is a stealth human craft, then what about Roswell? Why do we find the same elements in in in Roswell and San Augustine perhaps? And if it is an NHI then why do we find so much evidence of humanbuilt stealth materials lightweight sandwiched metal cores foamy materials hexagon even the hexagons are you know have many applications in radar absorption and like Jerro said the the diameter of the hexagons is just right to absorb you know to be tuned actually two radar frequencies. Now, that just means that the maker wanted to have a stealth craft. That doesn't tell us anything about the maker himself or herself. What will what may tell us more about them is if we do an isotope test.
Like we really need to do that because if we have two possible sources, a human one and a non-human one, if we have possible human craft and exotic craft at the same time, we need to know what that thing was because it is directly related to Roswell. Like I don't know, maybe maybe an F-17 collided with a UFO. That would explain things.
We just don't know yet. This is the end of my presentation. This research is ongoing and I'm just not jumping into any conclusion for for either for or against a UFO origin. We'll just have to wait and see.
関連おすすめ
Is dark matter real? - Why can't we find it? - physicist explains | Don Lincoln and Lex Fridman
LexClips
1K views•2026-05-30
Saptarshi Basu - Spectacular Voyage of Droplets: A Multiscale Journey to Extreme Flow Conditions
DAlembert-SU-CNRS
152 views•2026-06-02
A 6.0 Just Hit Hawaii — And It Came From The Wrong Place
TerraWatchHQ
115 views•2026-06-03
The Split-Second Mistake That Made Bouncing Bettys So Deadly
NoMansLandChannel
253 views•2026-06-02
Nobody Expected This Lava Reaction 🤯 #faits #facts
TendzDora
28K views•2026-05-30
The Silent Memory of Glass
UnchartedScienceworld
146 views•2026-05-30
The Difference In Charged And Neutral Particles
heavybrainspace
959 views•2026-05-29
A380 vs Every Vehicles Crash Test Challenge | Which One Win?
BeamLap
163 views•2026-05-29











