The ancient stone structures throughout the southern Appalachians, including the 885-foot wall at Fort Mountain, Georgia, were built by ancestors of the Cherokee, Creek, and other Native nations between 1000-2000 years ago, but the 19th-century 'vanished race' myth—which claimed these ruins were built by a lost civilization and not by Native peoples—was perpetuated to justify the Indian Removal Act and the Trail of Tears, as the myth served political interests by framing Native Americans as latecomers rather than original inhabitants.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Settlers Found Ancient Ruins in Appalachia — Then Marched Away Everyone Who Remembered (1838)
Added:spring. In the first years of the 1800s, a surveyor is running lines through the mountains of North Georgia, marking off territory that the maps back in the state capital still label as Cherokee country. He climbs a ridge that rises almost 3,000 ft above the valley floor, expecting laurel thicket, sandstone, and nothing else. Near the summit, he stops.
There is a wall, stone stacked without mortar, running 885 ft across the mountaintop in a jagged zigzagging line broken by gateways popped with circular pits. No one lives up here. No one has lived up here in living memory. He asks the Cherokee families in the valley who built it. They tell him something he does not expect. They tell him it was already old when their people arrived.
The settlers who follow him do the only thing they can think to do with a ruin nobody will claim. They named the mountain after it, Fort Mountain. And then for the next 200 years, almost everyone stops asking. The wall is still there. You can walk it today. Fort Mountain State Park, Murray County, Georgia, an hour and a half north of Atlanta. The structure runs along the summit just below the peak, waist high now, though early accounts describe it standing considerably taller before two centuries of souvenir hunters and freeze cycles wore it down.
29 pits are built into its length at rough intervals. There are gateways where the wall simply opens. There is no mortar anywhere. And there is one detail that dismantles the most obvious explanation the moment you notice it.
There is no water source at the summit.
None. A fort without water is not a fort. It is a place where a siege ends in 3 days. Whatever this wall was for, it was not for defense. And the people who named the mountain named it wrong.
The state of Georgia maintains the site, cuts the trails, prints the brochures, and the official signage, the actual placard placed there by the government agency responsible for the site, says that the origin of the wall is unknown.
Read that again. A state park in the United States of America contains a major prehistoric stone structure, and the official position of the state is that no one knows who built it or why.
That admission is not a small thing. We live in a country that has mapped, dated, cataloged, and monetized nearly every square foot of itself. There are historical markers for the birthplaces of minor congressmen. There are plaques on buildings where nothing happened. And on a Georgia mountaintop sits nearly 900 ft of deliberate, laborintensive stone construction, and the collective answer of the institutions charged with explaining it amounts to a shrug. The question nobody thinks to ask is not what the wall is. The question is how a civilization as obsessed with documentation as ours ended up standing in front of a ruin on its own soil in one of the oldest continuously inhabited regions of the continent with nothing to say. To understand how that silence became possible, you have to understand what these mountains actually are.
Because almost everything you assume about Appalachia is a story told backward. Start with the rock itself.
The Appalachian Mountains are among the oldest mountains on the surface of the earth. The ranges began rising roughly 480 million years ago. That number is difficult to hold, so let me translate it. The Appalachians are older than the Atlantic Ocean. When these peaks first pushed upward, the ocean that now separates them from Europe did not exist because Europe and North America were still fused together, and the Appalachians and the Scottish Highlands were the same mountain range. The Appalachians are older than trees.
They're older than bones. When these ridges first stood against the sky, nothing on Earth had yet evolved a skeleton. Geologists believe they once rivaled the Himalayas in height. And what you see today, the soft folded blue hazed ridges, is the worn down root system of something that was once among the tallest features of the planet. When you stand on an Appalachian summit, you're standing on the stump of a dead giant. And everything you have ever read about ancient Rome or ancient Egypt is a rounding error against the age of the ground under your boots. Now put people on that ground because the human story is where the record starts to bend. In the spring of 1540, a Spanish expedition under Hernando Dotto crossed the southern Appalachian. 600 men, horses, war dogs, forges, chains. The chronicers who traveled with him kept journals. And those journals do not describe a wilderness. They describe a countryside.
They describe towns with defensive palisades and public plazas. They describe cornfields running along the river bottoms for miles at a stretch, orchards, graneries, road networks, canoes waiting at river crossings. They describe a paramount chieftdom called Cusa centered in what is now northwest Georgia within a long day's walk of Fort Mountain whose influence extended across hundreds of miles and multiple modern states. Charles Hudson, the University of Georgia anthropologist who spent decades reconstructing the expedition's route town by town, described the 16th century southeast as a landscape of organized, populous agricultural societies. The Spanish did not walk through empty mountains. They walked through somebody's country. Even the word we use for the region concedes this. Appalachia is not an English word and not a settler invention. It comes from the Appalache, a people the Spanish met in 1528, whose name was stretched northward across the mountains by European map makers until it covered the whole range. The mountains are named for people we then proceeded to talk about as if they had never been there. And the people of these mountains built not just in wood and earth that time could erase, but in stone and in monuments that survive right now within driving distance of your house if you live anywhere in the eastern United States.
In Manchester, Tennessee, at the fork, where two branches of the Duck River meet, stands a structure the settlers called the Old Stone Fort. 4,600 ft of wall enclosing roughly 50 acres of plateau. The walls combine stone and earth, run along the cliff edges, and funnel any visitor through a single narrow entrance corridor. That entrance is aligned to the sunrise of the summer solstice. When University of Tennessee archaeologists led by Charles Fulner excavated the site in 1966, the radiocarbon dates came back staggering.
Construction began around the 1st century AD and continued layer by layer for roughly 400 years. Four centuries of sustained organized labor. And inside the enclosure, the excavators found almost nothing. No houses, no hearths, no garbage, no graves. 50 acres kept deliberately clean for hundreds of years. Whatever happened inside those walls, the people who built them made sure it left no residue. The settlers who found it called it a fort because a fort was the only thing their vocabulary offered. It is not a fort. It is a ceremonial enclosure the size of 40 football fields aligned to the sun older than most of the cathedrals of Europe sitting behind a Tennessee State Park visitor center in Union County, Georgia at a mountain pass called Track Rock Gap. The pattern repeats at even greater density.
In 2009, an archaeologist named Johannes Lubza conducted a systematic survey of the slopes above the gap and documented over 150 stone walls, terraces, and structures built into the mountainside with construction dating back roughly a thousand years.
150 stone constructions on a single Georgia mountainside. Down at the gap itself sit boulders covered in petroglyphs, carvings whose age no one can state with confidence. And across the state line in Jackson County, North Carolina, a single soapstone boulder called Judacolor Rock carries more than a,500 distinct carved figures. One of the largest concentrations of rock art in the eastern United States. Its meaning unread, its carvers formally listed as undetermined.
Farther north at Moundsville, West Virginia, the Grave Creek Mound rises 62 ft. One of the largest conicle burial mounds ever raised anywhere on Earth.
Built by hand, basket load by basket load more than 2,000 years ago. The town literally grew around it. There is a state penitentiary across the street.
Prisoners spent decades looking out at a monument older than the Roman coliseum.
And the official literature of the region treated it as a curiosity, a picnic backdrop, a thing that was simply there. And beyond the famous sites, the mountains are littered with construction almost nobody bothers to count. Stone cans, piled rock mounds run in fields across ridgetops and stream terraces throughout the southern Appalachians, sometimes dozens on a single slope.
Farmers plowed through them for two centuries, assuming they were field clearing piles, and some were. But archaeologists who have excavated intact examples have found deliberate internal structure, careful basil rings and datable native construction and tribal historic preservation offices of the Cherokee and Muskagee nations today identify many of these can fields as ancestral ceremonial and burial features. They are so common and so unglamorous that they have achieved a strange kind of invisibility.
There are almost certainly more prehistoric stone constructions in the southern Appalachian than anyone has ever put in a single database because the counting was never anyone's job.
Entire categories of monuments sit on logging land and in state forests, unmarked, unlisted, mistaken for agricultural debris by the descendants of the people who plowed around them.
One more detail belongs in this picture of the world before because it demolishes the most comfortable assumption of all, the assumption that the societies in question left no voice of their own.
In the 1820s, a Cherokee silvermith named Sequoia completed a syllibary for the Cherokee language, one of the only cases in recorded history of an individual single-handedly creating a functional writing system for his own people. Literacy in the news script spread through the Cherokee Nation with astonishing speed. By 1828, the nation had a bilingual national newspaper, the Cherokee Phoenix printed on a press at the capital of New Yot in the shadow of the same North Georgia mountains that hold the unexplained wall. A written constitution, a Supreme Court, a printing press. That is what actually stood in those valleys on the eve of removal. Not a scattering of wanderers with no connection to the land's monuments, but a literate constitutional nation publishing in its own alphabet 20 mi from Fort Mountain.
The press was seized when the nation was removed. Hold that fact next to every claim that the history of these mountains simply was not recorded. It was being recorded in two languages right up until the recording was confiscated. So hold both facts at once.
In 1540, these mountains were full, full of towns, monuments, fields, and roughly organized nations. And when English-speaking settlers finally pushed across the ridgeelines a century and a half later, they found something else entirely. They found silence, overgrown fields, abandoned town sites, trails leading to villages that no longer existed. Mounds and walls standing in forest with no one nearby who would say they built them. What happened in between is the turn this entire story rotates on and it is the part your education skipped. Disease happened. The pathogens that came ashore with the European expeditions, smallpox first among them, moved inland along the trade paths faster than any European did, and they moved through populations with no inherited resistance whatsoever.
Epidemiologists and historians who have studied the collapse estimate mortality across much of the Southeast at rates approaching 90% within a few generations of contact. 90%. Take any town you know and remove nine of every 10 people. Then remove the elders first because epidemics kill the old preferentially and understand what else dies with them.
The elders are the archive. The ceremonies, the histories, the reasons, the meaning of the wall on the mountain and the enclosure at the riverfork. All of it was stored in living memory. And living memory was precisely what the epidemics destroyed. The survivors regrouped, merged, moved, and reorganized into the nations the English would later meet. The Cherokee, the Creek, the Choctaw, the Chickasaw. But between Dotto cities and the settler's cabins lies a gap of roughly 150 years in which the population of an entire region collapsed and its institutional memory burned away invisibly without a single battle most history books bother to record.
And here is the mechanism that turned a tragedy into an erasia. The settlers walked into the emptiness and mistook it for eternity. They found vast forests and called them virgin. They found abandoned fields. so common that Indian old fields became a standard term on colonial land surveys and treated them as anomalies. They found monuments and could not connect them to the diminished regrouping nations living nearby because the scale of the monuments no longer matched the scale of the survivors. So a theory was born to fill the gap. And it is the theory, not the wall, that should genuinely disturb you. They called them the mound builders.
Through the entire 19th century, the dominant explanation printed in newspapers, preached from pulpits, published by learned societies, was that the mounds and walls of the interior had been built by a vanished race, a superior people who were definitely, emphatically not the ancestors of the native nations then living on the land.
Candidates were proposed with straight faces, a lost tribe of Israel, wandering Phoenicians, Vikings, refugees from Atlantis, a colony of 12th century Welshmen under a prince named Maddock, anyone, anyone at all, so long as they were gone and so long as they were not Indian. The theory held that this noble ancient race had been exterminated by the ancestors of the current tribes who were therefore not original inhabitants at all, but merely the most recent occupiers, squatters on the ruins of their victims. And the crulest part is that the answer was already on the record before the myth even took hold.
In the 1780s, Thomas Jefferson excavated a burial mound on his land near the Ravana River in Virginia. He did it methodically, cutting a trench, observing the layers, counting the interament in what historians of science now describe as the first stratographic archaeological excavation conducted anywhere in the world. Not the first in America, the first anywhere. And his conclusion published in his notes on the state of Virginia was plain. The mound was the work of the Indians, built up over generations, and native people in his own lifetime were known to visit such mounds with expressions of sorrow.
A founding father, using a method Europe had not yet invented, answered the question correctly before the 19th century had even begun. The country then spent the next 100 years ignoring him.
In 1848, the brand new Smithsonian Institution chose as the very first book it ever published a massive survey by Ephraim Squire and Edwin Davis titled Ancient Monuments of the Mississippi Valley, mapping hundreds of mounds and earthworks in meticulous engraved plates.
The first publication of America's National Scientific Institution was a catalog of monuments standing on American soil, and the intellectual climate around it still leaned toward a vanished race. The evidence was mapped, printed, bound, and distributed, and the conclusion the evidence pointed to remained unspeakable because the conclusion had a price attached, and the price was the entire legal and moral story the country was telling itself about the land. Stop and look at what the lost race story does. It is not an innocent mistake. It is a loadbearing story.
If the monuments belong to a vanished race and the living nations are just late comers who destroyed it, then removing those nations from the land is not conquest. It is almost justice. In December of 1830, President Andrew Jackson delivered his second annual message to Congress, defending the Indian Removal Act he had signed 7 months earlier, and he reached for exactly this argument. He pointed to the monuments and fortresses of a people he described as unknown, long extinct, their memory lost, and framed the living tribes as simply another wave in a natural succession. No more entitled to mourning than the vanished race they had supposedly replaced. The stated reason for removal was the welfare and survival of the tribes themselves. The real engine was land, and in North Georgia, the engine had a specific fuel. Gold had been discovered at Dalenega in 1829 in the heart of the Cherokee Nation, less than 40 m from the wall on Fort Mountain. Within 3 years, Georgia was distributing Cherokee land to white citizens by lottery. Within 8, federal soldiers were rounding Cherokee families into stockades for the March West that became the Trail of Tears. Some of those stockades stood in the same counties as the ancient ruins. The word fort did double duty in those mountains. It named the old walls no one could explain, and it named the new pens built to empty the land of the only people with any surviving thread of connection to them.
Sit with that overlap for a moment. In the same decade, in the same Georgia counties, the culture was doing two things simultaneously.
It was marveling at mysterious ancient ruins whose builders were declared unknowable. And it was marching away at gunpoint the descendants of the region's inhabitants, the people whose elders carried whatever fragments of testimony about those ruins still existed. The mystery was not discovered. The mystery was manufactured in real time by the same hands that took the land. Now, let me show you the evidence, and let me be careful with it, because this is the part where stories like this one usually go off the rails, and I refuse to follow them there. The oldest written testimony about Fort Mountain and the stoneworks of the Southern Mountains comes from the Cherokee themselves, filtered through early American scholars.
In 1797, Benjamin Smith Barton, a physician and naturalist in Philadelphia, published a study on the origins of American tribes in which he recorded a Cherokee tradition about the region's ancient structures. The Cherokee, he reported, attributed them to a people who had lived in the country before them, a people they called mooney because they saw poorly in daylight. A century later, the tradition was recorded again. This time by James Mooney, an ethnographer working for the Bureau of American Ethnology at the Smithsonian, who lived among the Eastern Cherokee for years and published his monumental myths of the Cherokee in 1900.
Mooney documented the same account, a pale, nocturnal eyed people already present in the mountains driven out westward long ago. Two collectors a h 100red years apart, one a Philadelphia naturalist and one a Smithsonian ethnographer recording the same core tradition from Cherokee sources. This is not an internet legend. It is an ethnographic record with a paper trail sitting in the publications of the American government's own research bureau. It does not tell us who the moeyed people were. It tells us something more important. It tells us the Cherokee were pointing backward at somebody earlier and that the memory of an earlier somebody survived even the collapse. The archaeology when it finally arrived pointed backward, too.
Fulner's 1966 excavation of the old stone fort produced radiocarbon dates spanning roughly the 1st through 5th centuries AD, placing construction firmly in what archaeologists call the middle woodland period, more than a thousand years before the Cherokee emerge as a distinct nation in the historical record. Loops's 2009 survey at Track Rock Gap dated the terrace complex to around a thousand years ago and attributed it to the ancestors of the Creek and Cherokee peoples. The Smithsonian's own reckoning came in 1894, and the story of how it came is its own indictment. In the 1880s, Congress funded the Bureau of Ethnology to settle the mound builder question once and for all, and the bureau assigned the project to an entomologist turned archaeologist named Cyrus Thomas.
Thomas began the survey as a believer in the lost race. He spent over a decade directing field crews through thousands of mounds and earthworks across the eastern United States. And in 1894, he published his conclusions in a report running more than 700 pages, one of the most exhaustive archaeological documents the American government had ever produced. His verdict reversed his own starting position completely. There was no vanished race. The mounds, the enclosures, the works, all of it was built by the ancestors of the living native nations. The lost civilization was not lost. It had been standing in front of the country the entire time.
And the country had spent a century inventing Welshmen rather than admit it.
Notice the date, 1894, 64 years after the removal act. 56 years after the Trail of Tears, 4 years after the massacre at Wounded Knee, which is generally treated as the end of armed native resistance on the continent, the government's scientific apparatus confirmed that the monuments belong to the ancestors of the removed nations at almost exactly the moment when the confirmation could no longer cost anyone a single acre. The stated reason for the survey was scientific curiosity. The timeline suggests something colder. The truth was allowed out only after it had been fully disarmed. Now the honest part, because I would rather lose some of you here than earn your trust dishonestly. If you go looking into Appalachian mysteries, you will run into artifacts and claims that do not survive scrutiny. And I need to tell you which ones. In 1889, a Smithsonian field agent named John Emma excavated a small mound at Bat Creek, Tennessee, and recovered a stone bearing a carved inscription. For a century, the Back Creek Stone bounced between interpretations. And in the 1970s, it became famous when scholars proposed the inscription was PaleoHebrew, proof of old world visitors in ancient Tennessee. It is almost certainly nothing of the kind. In 2004, archaeologists Robert Mayfort and Mary Quus published an analysis in the journal American Antiquity, showing that the inscription closely matches an illustration printed in a widely circulated Masonic reference book from 1870, 19 years before the stone conveniently surfaced. The stone is in all likelihood a 19th century plant.
Similarly, when the track rock terraces went viral in 2011 under the claim that Maya refugees had built a city in Georgia, professional archaeologists, including Mark Williams at the University of Georgia, dismissed the Maya connection flatly, and they were right to. The terraces need no imported builders, and the mooney people themselves have been claimed as evidence for Prince Maddox's Welshman, a theory with no archaeological support whatsoever. I could build a much more viral video out of Hebrew stones and Welsh princes and Maya exiles. Millions of views live inside those stories. I am not telling them because they are the modern descendants of the mound builder myth and they commit the same sin. They hand the monuments to anyone except the people who actually built them. Because here is what the debunkings do not touch. And this is the center of everything. Strip away every fraud and every fantasy and you are left with a set of facts that is stranger and heavier than any of them. The structures are real. The wall on Fort Mountain is real and its builders and purpose remain officially unresolved to this day. The old stone fort is real. Four centuries of construction aligned to the solstice kept ritually empty. The 150 stone works above track rock gap are real. Juda color rock is real and unread. Grave creek is real. The moeyed people tradition is real ethnography recorded twice by credentialed scholars a century apart. The woodland period dates are real, peer-reviewed, and they describe organized societies undertaking monumental construction in these mountains while Rome was still governing Britain. None of this is hidden. Every piece of it sits in state park brochures, university site reports, and government publications. And yet, if you stopped a hundred Americans on the street, including in Georgia, including in Tennessee, and asked them whether the eastern United States contains ancient monumental ruins, most would say no.
Most would guess you had to fly to Mexico or Peru or Egypt to stand in front of something like this. That gap between what is documented and what is known is not an accident. It is an inheritance.
I sat with the maps for a long time before I could organize this story, longer than I want to admit. What finally stopped me was not any single site. It was laying two maps of North Georgia over each other. One showed the ancient works, Fort Mountain, Track Rock, the mound centers along the Kusawati and Etawa rivers. The other showed the geography of the removal, the gold district at Darlenega, the land lottery grids, the stockades where Cherokee families were held in the summer of 1838, and Newota, the Cherokee national capital with its printing press and bilingual newspaper, which sat barely 20 m from the foot of Fort Mountain. The two maps are the same map.
The oldest unexplained monuments in the eastern United States and the machinery built to empty the land around them occupy the same valleys, the same watersheds, sometimes the same present-day counties. I kept looking for a way to present these as two separate stories, an archaeology story and a removal story. There is no way. There is only one story and the wall and the stockade are both in it. And once you see it, you cannot unsee it because the pattern extends past the stone and into the living landscape itself. The forest you picture when you picture Appalachia, the deep, dark, primeval wilderness, is also a ruin, and almost no one recognizes it as one. The chronicers and the earlier settlers consistently described open park-like woods in much of the region. Forests you could ride a horse through at speed because native nations managed them deliberately with fire clearing underbrush, maintaining game habitat, keeping orchards and cane breaks and field systems in continuous production. When the populations collapsed, the management collapsed with them and the forest closed in over the fields, over the town sites, over the roads.
The impenetrable wilderness that settlers described conquering was not the original condition of the land. It was regrowth. It was what 150 years of catastrophe looks like from the outside.
The pioneers were not taming a wilderness. They were clearing a graveyard that had grown over. And they built a national identity on the misreading. Every log cabin myth, every story of carving civilization out of virgin forest. Every Daniel Boon engraving stands on that inversion. The wilderness was the aftermath. We printed the aftermath in the textbooks as the beginning. This is where I have to be precise about what I am claiming because the word conspiracy would be both lazy and wrong. Nobody sat in a room and voted to forget the ruins of Appalachia.
Nothing so organized was ever required.
The pattern assembled itself out of interests the way these patterns always do. The settlers needed the land to be empty, so they saw emptiness. The state of Georgia needed the Cherokee to be late comers, so the vanished race theory was useful and useful theories get printed. The gold needed digging, so the lottery wheels turned. And by the time the Smithsonian's own 700page report dismantled the myth in 1894, there was no land left to give back and no political cost to the truth. So the truth was published, filed, and allowed to sit politely in libraries while the myth kept circulating in the culture for another century. Nobody had to burn anything. The system only had to make sure that the correction always arrived after the consequence. That is the pattern. And it is quieter and more durable than any plot could ever be. And it is still running. In 2017, the Forest Service closed public access to the Track Rock Gap Terrace Complex after vandals damaged the ancient walls, toppling stones that had stood in place for centuries. Think about the shape of that. A monumental site. most Americans have never heard of. Attributed for a century to nobody. Finally documented by professional survey, briefly famous for the wrong reason, and then physically closed, removed from public view entirely because we could not be trusted near it. The ruins that survived the epidemics, survived the removal, survived 200 years of plows and souvenir hunters are now being locked away from a public that was never taught they existed in the first place. The circle does not just close, it seals. So, make this personal because it is. If your family comes from these mountains from North Georgia or East Tennessee or Western Carolina, and millions of American families do, then somewhere in your line there is a deed, a first deed, and that deed has a date. Look at it. If the land lies in the old Cherokee nation, the paper trail likely begins in the 1830s with a lottery ticket or a purchase made in the immediate wake of the removal. Your family's oldest document about that land is younger than the silence around the wall. The hollow where your people settled had a name before them, a history before them, possibly a monument standing within a few miles of the home place that no one at the kitchen table could explain because the explanation had been marched to Oklahoma a generation earlier. The brick wall genealogologists hit the point where the record stop has a mirror image in these mountains. The land itself hits a wall in the 1830s. Before that line, the deeds run out and the stone begins. Go stand at the wall on Fort Mountain some evening, close to dusk, when the day visitors have gone down. Put your hand on the stones. Each one was chosen, carried, and placed by a person whose name, language, and purpose have been severed from you by a chain of events you can now trace link by link.
An epidemic that erased the archive. A myth that reassigned the monuments to phantoms. A removal that emptied the valleys of the last people holding even fragments of the thread. A government report that told the truth only after the truth was safe. And a culture that filed the whole thing under wilderness and moved on. The Cherokee said the builders were there before them. A people with eyes made for the dark. The state of Georgia says the origin is unknown. Both statements are doing the same quiet work. Both are pointing at an emptiness where testimony used to be.
The mountains themselves are older than bones, older than the ocean that separates them from their other half in Scotland. They have carried every version of this story without comment.
The towns Totto walked through the silence that followed, the wagons, the stockades, the lottery wheels, the 700 pages nobody read in time. The wall was old when the Cherokee arrived. It was old when the surveyor climbed the ridge.
It was old when the soldiers built the other kind of fort in the valley below.
It is standing there tonight. 885 ft of deliberate human intention on public land. An easy walk from a parking lot in a country that has a plaque for everything. And the plaque says unknown.
Who kept it unknown? Who benefited decade after decade from a ruin with no owner and a wilderness with no past?
What else in these mountains was documented, filed, confirmed, and never allowed to matter? The stones were placed by hand. Someone knew why.
Someone always knew why.
The knowing did not fade. It was carried west under guard. And the mountain kept the wall. And the wall kept its silence.
And we called the silence a mystery so we would never have to call it what it
Related Videos

osman bey happy and sad moments
FateheUmmat
201 views•2026-04-19

Gregory Williams lecture "Life on the Color Line", 1999-09-14
BallStateUniversityLibraries
1K views•2019-07-31

5 National Parks To Visit In PA's Laurel Highlands
Redoubt_Productions
433 views•2025-06-14

Uncovered Untold Histories by Prof. Touraj Atabaki
elaheomidyarmir-djalaliins6723
148 views•2025-01-22

A Super Quick History of Bulgaria
MrHistory1
69K views•2019-09-12

Won Over: Reflections of a Federal Judge on His Journey from Jim Crow Mississippi
ndhistoricalsociety
212 views•2019-12-09

St Andrew's Day: Explained, a little.
visitscotland
36K views•2019-11-30

The Times Atlas of World History | Wikipedia audio article
wikipedia-fan02
290 views•2019-06-16
Trending

WOW! Judge TURNS THE TABLES on Trump in His OWN $10B LAWSUIT!!!
MeidasTouch
197K views•2026-07-23

Playstation NO DISC/NO BUY Fight Is Over...
DavidJaffeGames
4K views•2026-07-23

Steam and Xbox Just Dropped The Hammer On PlayStation
OhNoItsAlexx
9K views•2026-07-23

Americans Confused in Australia for 17 Minutes Straight
IWrocker
17K views•2026-07-23