Political ideology significantly influences voting behavior, as individuals often prioritize ideological alignment over personal safety or other considerations when making political decisions. This video demonstrates how political beliefs shape voting choices through a debate where one participant expresses willingness to vote for Donald Trump despite personal risks, illustrating the depth of ideological commitment in political decision-making.
Installieren Sie unsere Erweiterung an, um sofort in jedem Video zu suchen
Dean & Parker Take On The Most Unhinged MAGA Dad YetHinzugefügt:
[music] >> How old is the party? 51. Do you support Trump? Absolutely. Okay, if the election were held today, Harris versus Trump, who would you rather vote for?
I wouldn't vote for Harris to save my daughter.
Are you Are you actually literally saying that?
>> I wouldn't Well, look Like if your daughter was actually going to die, you wouldn't vote for Harris?
>> I would I would watch I would watch her pass away.
Dude, that's a that's a diabolically horrible take. What What is wrong with you? Why?
>> Oh, you asked.
>> I didn't ask. You just randomly brought it up.
>> Well, I wouldn't vote for Harris to save my Okay, I'm not going to repeat myself, but like I'm not a Harris fan. Just accept it and move on. Okay, but like why Why is it that Okay, what did Harris do that is so bad? Because she's Because she's Or do you just not care about your >> Allow me to answer.
Yeah, yeah. Allow me to answer. She's criminally incompetent. She's just a secretary for the deep state.
Her loss was the greatest thing to happen to America.
>> Okay, so she's criminally incompetent.
What makes you think that she's incompetent? Because she doesn't have any confidence in herself. She doesn't believe in the crap that she's spewing.
All she believed in was Okay, it's my turn to play Santa Claus and dole out money to migrants, dole out money to voters. She is the California mentality.
That [snorts] California-Minnesota mentality is what we're fighting against. It's nothing personal.
Okay, so you said that she's a direct director of the deep state. How do you know that she's a director of the deep Hell no, she's not a director of the deep state. I said she's an office manager of the deep state. She's a secretary. Okay, what makes you think she's an a secretary of the deep state?
Because she stutters when she tries to deep to spew out deep state's crap.
>> Okay, I don't I don't know what deep state crap you're referencing. And also like she I think she explains her positions mighty well.
>> When she's not drunk.
>> There's no evidence that she was ever drunk in any of her speeches.
All right. You haven't seen her later photos. You know that Trump You know that Trump literally said that we should that we should look into disinfectant by injection to fight COVID-19. He said that windmills are causing whales to die in numbers never seen before. He said that if Jesus were the vote counter in California that he would have won the vote against Joe Biden.
He looked up at his eyes or looked at looked up with his bare eyes at an eclipse twice.
He said that he drinks diet Coke because it kills grass, meaning it kills cancer.
Do you understand that that's literally like criminally incompetent?
>> I don't care. He's not a deep state shill.
>> you determine the difference determine whether or not someone's a deep state shill or or whether they're not? Because I would argue if you think that there's a everything that you think that is bad about the deep state is more true about Trump than it is Harris. I promise you that.
Yeah. Yeah. Okay. It's very simple.
The principles the founding principles of America is pro-capitalism, pro-individual liberty, and pro-religious tolerance. The far right is moving towards anti-Semitism, Marxism, and ultimately nihilism and and stuff.
Donald Trump has more of the values that I want personally for America than Kamala Harris, who doesn't even know what her values are because she's always drunk. I think she knows clearly what her values are and she can describe it a lot better than Trump can. Can you tell me what Trump's values are specifically?
I told you Donald Trump is pro-liberty, pro-religious tolerance, pro-capitalism.
I said it. You need to pay attention.
>> Oh. Okay. Wait. I thought you were I thought you were just saying that those were America's values were. I I think there's a distinction between Trump's values and America's values. So, let's go through this. Trump's not pro-religious tolerance. He quite literally has called for a complete and total shutdown of all Muslims entering the country. And yes, that's me. I'm I believe in secularism. I believe in religious tolerance as an atheist.
>> That's what That's all fine and good, but you're still kind of at the opposite ends of what I believe is good for the country. I don't believe that we necessarily need to be anti-religious. I just think that we should have tolerance for religion instead of the left who are becoming incredibly anti-Semitic, incredibly anti-Christian, incredibly anti-natalist, incredibly anti-American.
I think it's bad to be anti-Semitic. I think it's I think it's When you say anti-Christian, do you just mean like we disagree with Christianity or like what do you mean? No, I think I think you guys are playing the the game of using Christian nationalism to attack Christians when in actuality you mean all Christians. The only time I've seen the political left >> attacking the use of Christianity in the context of the law. I'm not attacking all of Christianity. I'm attacking the the use of theocracy.
>> So you say but I've the only time I've I've seen progressive happy is when a Christian father gets unalived in front of national televisions or there's a mass unalivement at a school or at a church with Christians in it or when when When have When have leftists ever celebrated a mass unaliving of Christians? The school Name one. Name one that was celebrated by leftists.
>> There was there was there was there was a trans child there was a trans child that went inside of a school and started unaliving a Christian kid. This is not just one incident. I have. You're not looking. Where? You're not looking.
You're on TikTok, sir. This is the foundation You want to go back in time and start looking at messages cuz like we could do this as a correspondence. I could walk you through it.
>> just I'm genuinely just asking where should I look to find this. If it's not here on TikTok, where should I find it?
Well, look at the news. Look at the news of how people reacted to the mass unalivements in schools, the drownings of the children in that Texas town. The only time I've seen progressives happy is when Christians are dying. I don't I've I've never seen a single Can you name one single progressive? Can you name one single progressive that's ever been happy at that?
>> Anyone who did a Anyone who did a Charlie Kirk response video celebrating what happened. Anyone who I Those are two By the way, those are two two separate things, but can you name a single person >> things. Okay, two separate things. Okay, look. You want me to go through the entire media scape, the zeitgeist of people who are trans in the face of the One person.
>> No, that's that's that's myopic. That is myopic. I don't I don't even I don't even want to justify that.
>> be able to give me any examples. Can you give me a signal that I don't >> stream Can you at least acknowledge that I don't >> Oh, fine. But if your media stream is is you going through the news of a mass unalivenment because you know the term trans Tifa came out of the fact that a lot of trans individuals were conducting unalivenments. If you you're going through the news and you're going through the comment sections of people That's just literally fear mongering from the right.
Hey, hold up. Hold up. Hold up. Trans Trans Tifa is a thing created by the far right to fear monger about trans people.
>> exist.
It doesn't exist.
>> I'm I'm Antifa. I'm Antifa. Are you Antifa?
>> are.
Hell no. What Okay, so are you pro fascism or neutral to fascism? Yeah, that's Sir, I'm not a child. That's called a composition fallacy. I do not accept the fact that you are pro fascist that you are anti-fascist. So there's no need for me to reconcile my beliefs and your beliefs.
>> Antifa just means anti-fascist. So if you're not anti-fascist >> composition fallacy. I don't believe that you're anti-fascist.
>> It's not a composition fallacy. Can you tell me what a composition fallacy is?
>> If A is not true, then P If the first statement is not true, then the second statement isn't true either.
I don't believe that you're anti-fascist in one in one iota.
>> what a composition A composition fallacy is saying because some parts of a particular object or thing work a certain way that means all parts of it work that same way. That's what a composition fallacy is saying.
>> You just described that argument of oh well, I'm Antifa because I'm anti-fascist. That is exactly what you're doing, sir. Yes, sir. The definition of the word doesn't You know, how about this? How about this? So are you are you pro or neutral to fascism?
Are you anti-fascism?
Sir, I'm Sir, do you understand that words have both prescriptive and descriptive meanings? I'm not sure of the prescriptive meanings that they would have. Like I I don't know how a definition could be prescriptive.
>> It's called semiotics, sir. There's the observe There's the um signifier and the signified. You say that antifascist means I am antifascist. I'm not seeing it that your way. I'm seeing Mangione. I'm seeing young men burn down factories.
I'm seeing young men burn down the past palisades. I'm seeing young men go run up in front of embassies and unalive Jewish kids. I don't call that antifascist, sir. According to me, the signified in this fascism. What you're doing is fascism. And I'm fighting you.
Wait, you said all I'm doing is fascism?
Yes. What am I doing that's fascism?
>> You're promoting lies saying that um you you you promote you're you're being a propagandist for um violent extremists.
Okay, what How am I being a propagandist for violent extremists? What violent extremists am I am I a propagandist for?
>> You're giving You're giving You're giving them safe cover by making arguments like, "Well, antifascism means antifascism." So, unless you're with It's called the composition fallacy.
You're just not there, son. Oh, okay.
So, are you trying to say that um I'm arguing that all of Antifa is just antifascism and that there's nothing No person who's Antifa that had bad ideological beliefs. So, obviously there are people that can be Antifa that have bad ideological beliefs that I disagree with. But, Antifa in of itself is just describing that you're against fascism.
Now, that does not make me a propagandist for violent extremists because I acknowledge that Antifa means against fascism. Sir. And that's the way that I'm using the term. That's not promoting lies. That's not propaganda.
That's not supporting violent extremists. By the way, you're the one that's engaging in propaganda for a violent extremist, like Donald Trump who's a violent offender and has called for the deaths of some Democrats because he said to follow the law and not follow unlawful orders. That said he's glad that Robert Mueller's dead and with Rob Reiner as well, right? I can give plenty of examples of his violent rhetoric that he engaged in. He's a violent extremist that promotes violent extremism and you're a propagandist right now that's defending him and promoting lies on the internet in defense of Um yeah, that's all well and good, but we're fighting, see. Donald Trump has cussed out the people who are wishing death upon him.
So, anything is everything is fair game when it comes to insulting people personally. He did not He did not um cause the death of Rob Reiner. That was That was liberal policies and chemical dependency.
>> He said he was glad about it.
>> Sir, well, he has every right to be glad about it. People are waiting to celebrate his passing. Wait, wait, wait.
So, then would you say that people were right to be glad about Charlie Kirk's death?
>> You know what? At that point, I don't care anymore. Those are my mortal enemies, and of course my mortal enemies are going to celebrate what harms me.
>> But wait, are they are they So, are they justified in being glad about Charlie Kirk's death?
>> In in their sense, yes.
>> [laughter] >> You just justified them doing that, by the way. You're talking No, no, no.
We're talking about >> under your view under your view under your view, is it justified for them to say that they're glad that Charlie Kirk died?
As a part of their value structure, possibly. As a part of mine's, no. Do you understand the nuance of that? Dude, this guy just justified people saying that they're glad about Charlie Kirk's death, and then you're trying to criticize it. You're criticizing the very behavior you just said was justified. If you hate if you hate Christianity, Judaism, Israel, America, of course you're going to celebrate Charlie Kirk's passing. Okay, wait. Why why why are all these points put put together? So, let's go through this. So, I don't hate America, Sure, you don't. I don't Okay, so explain to me why you think I hate America.
>> Because you're trying to surrender American values to a anti-Semitic Marxist nihilistic anti-natalist um I ain't going to say religion, but ultimately a a belief structure.
>> So, I'm neither Marxist or uh anti- anti-natalist. So, what makes you think I'm anti-natalist or Marxist?
>> I just think that you're you're waiting for uh I think that when push comes to shove, you're going to find out that you are actually anti-natalist.
No, I want to have kids. I I want to have kids. I actually want to have >> Sure.
I I want to have like two to three children.
>> Sure you do. Okay. Sure you do. The time will tell.
>> Yeah, I do. I do want to have kids.
>> Time will tell.
Yeah, it will tell. Yeah, and also also do you know what a post-structuralist nation is?
>> wait. Pause. You said I'm a Marxist anti-natalist. I'm neither a Marxist nor an anti-natalist. Given that you acknowledge now that you're wrong, are you the one promoting lies?
>> No, wait wait wait wait. You're jumping to conclusions. I'm not saying that I'm wrong. I'm saying time will tell the truth. Time will tell. So okay, so can you tell me Okay, so you're you're saying I'm not an anti-natalist right now, but I will be in the future.
>> I'm saying I'm saying I'm saying time will tell. So I'm not an anti-natalist right now, but I will be in the future.
>> Time will tell. The future will will play itself out.
>> of right now, I'm not an anti-natalist.
As of right now, I'm not a Marxist. Can you agree with that?
>> No.
What?
>> [laughter] >> No no, you ever heard the term you ever heard the expression guilt by >> can't. I'm going to tell you what your ideological beliefs are even when you're telling me you don't hold those ideological beliefs. And you provided no indication that you have those ideological beliefs. I'm still going to say it.
I'm just I'm just judging you by your friends. Your Antifa friends. My Antifa, who are these Antifa friends?
You yourself identified as Antifa, right? Yes.
>> And Antifa is an Yes, I am an anti-natalist Marxist.
And Antifa Antifa means just against fascism. By the way, >> Wait wait wait. Pause. Pause. What you did >> That's called the composition fallacy.
>> Actually, what you just did was a composition fallacy. You're trying to say that because I'm Antifa, that means I'm like all of Antifa. You just did a composition fallacy without even realizing it.
>> [laughter] >> That's called No, that's called guilt by association, but you yourself have said that you Stop. Stop. Stop. Stop. Stop.
Stop. No, seriously, you didn't even realize that. Pause. Please. Please.
Please. Let me explain this to you.
Composition fallacy means because some properties of this particular thing operate that way, that means all properties operate that way. So, what you're saying is because some because some of Antifa is this way, that means all of Antifa is this way. That's actually a composition fallacy. I can't even believe you just said that without even realizing it was a composition fallacy. You don't even know what you're saying right now. These are just buzzwords to you.
Mhm, that's called guilt by association, but you yourself identified as Antifa.
And like I said, >> do you agree with guilt by association?
No, wait, stop.
Guilt by association, you you you specifically said that you are Antifa, and I'm like, you are part of an anti-American, anti-natalist, Marxist, pagan, nihilistic, unstructured >> That's wrong. Antifa does not indicate any of those other beliefs. It just means you're against fascism.
But, can I ask you a question? Do you believe Do you believe in guilty by association?
>> Sometimes. That's what we go for. So, then how about how about we use that How about with Trump and how about with Trump and Epstein? Show me the Show me the court case that I should condemn Donald Trump when it comes to Epstein.
Yeah, so there's actually >> What's the court case number? Yeah, look up NPR investigation >> no, no, no, no.
Well, I'm telling >> have had the notes ready. I I already am telling you. NPR investigation into DOJ scrubbing files uh associated with interviews against Trump, allegations against Trump. With allegations against Trump. That's what you need to look into. And it has court documents specifically about Jane Doe 4's accusations specifically, where she got a settlement with the Epstein estate, and the accusations that she engaged in also then implicate Trump because she said that Epstein trafficked her to Trump. They uh um I don't I don't buy that. I don't buy that because Jane Doe number four got a settlement from Epstein. She didn't get anything from Donald Trump. Donald Trump didn't pay any settlement especially to that woman.
If we believe her accusations to be true against Epstein because she got a settlement from the Epstein estate, then those accusations because they include Donald Trump would also then implicate him. Donald Trump had to deal with um paying out settlements to some to a woman that he had a possible non-consensual relations to from 1993. And the woman who's made that accusation against Donald Trump, allegedly, hasn't gotten any money from Donald Trump. What do you think what would you think that entails?
Wait, E. Jean Carroll, for example, for example, has gotten money >> Wait, E. Jean Carroll, for example, has gotten money from Trump because she won the case against Trump in a civil case against him that determined that he abused her.
>> Yeah, I know. Let's Let's not worry about E. Jean Carroll. Let's talk about your Jane Doe.
>> Wait, why are we talking Okay, why are we pivoting to millions of dollars?
>> because No, because I'm saying that New York is out to was out to get Donald Trump and they were able to resurrect the E. Jean Carroll case from 1993.
>> 1996.
>> Yeah. No, well, why cannot Why can't they resurrect this Jane Doe chick? You don't suppose that it's because that it didn't it didn't happen, right?
So, wait, are you supposing that with E.
Jean Carroll it did happen?
>> I I don't want to talk about you E. Jean Wait, your argument supposes that. Your argument No, no, no. Your argument supposes that the only >> I'm saying that the quote-unquote brought back. Wait, pause. Your argument here supposes that the only reason it wasn't quote-unquote brought back is because it didn't happen. Okay, well, the E. Jean Carroll one you believe was brought back. Therefore, you believe it did happen.
>> [laughter] >> Sir, yeah, yeah, yeah, sir. No, no, no.
Here's the problem.
>> Dude, you're just owning yourself.
You're tripping on your own feet.
You're tripping on your own feet.
>> You said your speech. You said your speech. I said specifically, I don't even want to talk about the E. Jean Carroll, which is still being >> Carroll. processed. It's I don't care.
It's being processed and it's going through the It's going through the Supreme Court right now. I said that using her case as a standard and the millions, the hundreds of million dollars that the Democrats are willing to spend to prosecute Donald Trump.
Hundreds of millions The money to prosecute Trump. What are you talking about?
>> Yes, they are.
E. Jean Carroll did not She did not She did not finance her own court case. A billionaire did. Yeah, but that's It's the Democrats. A billionaire is not the same as the Democrats. Of course it's not. Of course it's not.
>> it's not. Like what?
Do you realize that those are different categories of of things? The DNC is not the same as some random billionaire.
>> No, I don't. How do you know that he's not a Democrat? He's a Democrat supporter, obviously.
>> wait. Him being a Democratic supporter doesn't mean anything. There are Wait, do you do you hold Donald Trump accountable for the KKK supporting him?
>> That's That's not even germane to the issue. I'm talking about real supporters.
>> do you do you hold Trump accountable for the KKK supporting him? Can I have a Answer to that question. That you you you're monkey branching to another topic. I'm talking about putting hundreds of million dollars into a court case, as well as changing the laws to make it possible >> Not the DNC.
Not the DNC.
That was not the DNC.
Reid Hoffman is not the DNC. He's a pure Democrat. Reid Hoffman is not the DNC.
Reid Hoffman is not the DNC.
Bro, bro, E. Jean Carroll's being propped propped propped up by the Democrats.
>> E. Jean E. Jean did not fund her campaign. Fall on your sword, dude. Fall on your sword, dude.
>> Sorry, the E. Jean Carroll did not fund her court case. Or sorry, I can't speak.
E. Jean Carroll's court case was not funded by the DNC. You probably think I'm funded by the DNC, so I don't know what you're talking about. I don't care.
I'm not making those accusations. I just think that you're an anti-analyst, Marxist, anti- >> I'm not. I'm not a Marxist or Can you define Wait, hold on. Can you define You think I'm anti-Semitic? Can you define Marxism?
>> Marxism is the belief in a classless, stateless society, or a Democrat base. So, Democrat equal Marxism. Is that what it is? Yes, that's what I'm saying. Cuz y'all keep asking the exact same statement. Define Define Marxism.
>> Wait, I have a question. I have a question. Was Trump Was Trump ever a Marxist?
Was Trump ever a Marxist?
No. Well, he used to be a Democrat, so then under your view, he used to be a Marxist.
>> He He was a capitalist, though.
Wait, so so you don't think that all Democrats are Marxist?
>> I think modern Democrats are Marxists. I think modern Democrats are anti-American.
Anti-Christian, anti-Semites. Okay, so you so I'm an anti-Semite. So what makes you think I'm anti-Semitic? Yes. What makes you think that?
>> Because I think you hate all societies that achieve more than Marxism allows them to.
>> [snorts] >> I'm not a Marxist and I don't hate all societies that are outside of Marxism.
>> No, I don't.
>> Sure. Okay.
Okay.
Um look, I said let me say it from the beginning.
>> So I'm anti-Semitic because I hate everything out of Marxism when I'm not a Marxist. What? Well, look, look, I'm just going to I'm just going to put out the premise right here and there because we we we're we're monkey branching from 16 different topics. Okay, I'm going to I'm going to thank some people real quick and then we can continue on that conversation. This is I need a I need a minute. I need a minute. [laughter] Heather, thank you so much for $3. Thank you very much. I really appreciate it.
Thank you. Seriously though, that literally a composition fallacy, am I right? JC, thank you so much for $1.
Thank you. Lois, thank you so much. I really appreciate the $10. Thank you.
Michelle, thank you so much for $10.
Thank you very much. Well, thank you for letting me know that. I really appreciate it. I definitely won't. Thank you so much. Um as well as Avon, thank you so much for $3. Thank you very much.
Leoni, thank you so much for $2. I really appreciate it. Thank you.
As well as Rachel, thank you so much. I really appreciate the $10. Thank you very much. I really appreciate it. Um Greasy, thank you so much. I really appreciate the $5 as always. Ashley, thank you so much for $5. Thank you.
Make sure to catch up fully on YouTube super chat. If you're on YouTube, make sure to hit that thumbs up. Straight to 3,000 likes. I'd really really appreciate for the 3,900 people here. I think we can easily do that. And if you want to support me as always, Venmo, PayPal links are in the bios also in the description of the YouTube. So you can support me over YouTube super chat as always. Bridget, thank you for $5. Lucy, thank you for $5. Ashley with $5 and the King of the Golden State, thank you for $10. I think I'm fully caught up.
Already, already. Um Noel as well, thank you for $5. Thank you very much. I really appreciate it. Thank you.
Already, already. You can continue with your point, man. Yeah, I think that America is shifting towards um at least uh I'm going to call it Republicanism, um small government, pro-capitalist, pro-religious tolerance, pro-individual liberty versus a Marxist, anti- religion, anti-individual liberty, anti-Christian, um violent sect. That's what I think.
That's what That's pretty much where I think we're headed to. Like, that's where the line in the sand is. Like, you could be called a Republican just because you're like a Spencer Pratt who believes in safe streets and, um, that homeless people shouldn't be giving free needles. So, yeah.
I think we're we're we're caught in a schism. No, I said Pratt has a bunch of MAGA ideologies on top of that. It's not just those two things. Um, secondly, um, uh, how am I anti-Christian? Can you explain that one?
>> Yeah, you're just running a you're you're running defense for, um, the anti-Christian platform of the Democratic Party. Like what specifically? Just disagreeing with Christianity? Like I I'm just not Christian myself.
>> think I think, uh, if you, uh, if you look at your uh, the people that you defend, you're going to be defending anyone who, um, attacks Christians. You're going to be, um, you're going to be doing What was that damn Like I said, there was, um, flood. There was a school mass on the live thing. There was an attack at the church and every time you go down the comment section of the news report, you see people celebrating those actions.
>> want to hear other people. I want to hear Mark.
>> That is the new mentality of the >> You know what? Pause. Pause. Pause.
Pause. Pause. I want a criticism of me as a person. I don't want a criticism of other people right now. I want you to tell me why you think I am anti-Christian.
>> Because you're getting financed from individual anti-Christians. Not Not anti-Christian institutions like the DNC, but you're you're basically, this is a capitalistic endeavor for you. This is a financial endeavor. Like, >> So, now I'm a capitalist. Now I'm not Marxist.
No, I said that what you're doing right now is a capitalist endeavor. You're trying to finance your lifestyle.
>> right?
>> Well, it's not, but I still, I mean, you ever heard the term better red than dead? I think when push comes to shove, you're going to you're going to push every every, um, Christian, white male, capitalist up against the wall so that, you know, Che Guevara could have his way with them.
Dude, what are you talking about? I What? I'm not a socialist. Two, I'm not Marxist. Three, I'm a liberal. I believe in social democracy and I believe in like progressive liberalism. Okay, I'm a capitalist. I still believe in social safety nets, regulations, and a capitalist framework, right? Like of course, but I think that there needs to be regulations and safety nets to ensure the bad elements of capitalism are not allowed to prevail. Now, in terms of in terms of my view, my view is not anti-Christian as a whole. My view is simply to saying Christianity should not be used as the basis for our laws.
Right? Separation of church and state.
That's how you live in a democracy with people of different ideological beliefs, with people with different religious views, is you believe you live in a world that is not predicated off of people's religious perspectives, but rather predicated off of a secular understanding of the world. That's the best way to run these laws. Now, that's not anti-Christian as a whole.
I don't understand how that's bigoted against Christianity. I don't know what your whole point is with that. Um I think you're just weaponizing Christianity right now.
Yeah, yeah, I'm just talking about the general malaise of using um Christian nationalist as an epithet, as if it's wrong to love the country that you're in while you're a Christian. Um a lot of people have weaponized the term A lot of people have weaponized the term Christian nationalist, just like they've weaponized the term Zionist. And I understand why Christians and Jews are the enemies of Marxists. I understand it.
Again, stop. Why are you weaponizing the word term Marxist against me when I'm not a Marxist?
You can explain all about the weaponization of terms and then you just continue to call me a Marxist when I'm not.
>> Well, I'm just saying you're running you're in you're running interference for Marxists in America.
>> I'm not running I'm not You're saying you're saying the reason why you're going to say all these things about me is because there's people who send me money who are anti-Christian. What people are sending me money that are truly anti-Christian?
Like against all Christianity, not just like the influence of it in the the Like I disagree with Christianity, but that doesn't mean I'm bigoted against Christianity. Mhm.
Sure.
If you say so. No, tell me. Like I'm not I'm not going to hold you to trial. Like I said, you have a right to identify as whoever you want, but I I pretty much I'm I got my mind made up with this situation. I think there's a lot of people who are congregating at the opposite ends of liberty, capitalism, and religious tolerance, and they're they're forming a hegemonic identity called leftism, which is Marxist communist >> Okay, so can you criticize me for me? At this point, criticize me for me.
That's That's rich coming from the political left. Everybody calls everyone um racist, homophobe, and all that stuff, you know.
You're asking for people to be treated by the content of their the the content of their character instead of the color of their skin.
That's That's a novel idea. I wish more leftists would would um follow through on that.
>> Okay, so so then you think you wish more left-wing people were like me. So then you don't criticize me. No.
No. No, I think that you haven't been broken yet.
And I'm I'm I'm expecting you to be broken into the political left. So that's why it's kind of I just want I want to know my the criticizing What's What's your criticism of my view?
>> Your view Your view is the What is it?
It's It's the centrist view, but I think you're trending towards I think your audience is going to force you to the far left eventually.
I I'm waiting. So like what particular view do you disagree with that I hold to? And I wouldn't consider myself a centrist. I'm a progressive liberal. I'm still like Yeah, I'd say I'm pretty I'm pretty far left for this country still.
Yeah, exactly. You're a secular progressive, and I think you're trending towards Marxist communist. I'm not a Marxist or a communist. Can you please just tell me what particular view you find that I disagree with?
>> said trending.
I just said trending. But like what views do I have that indicate that to you?
>> I I I'm not one of your regular followers. I just wanted to say that. We started this conversation off on why I voted for Donald Trump, and I believe that Donald Trump is here to protect me from the anti-Christian, anti-Jewish, anti-American, anti-natalist violent progressive left. That's why I'm here.
>> Okay, so um And that's that's not me. So, if I can disagree with Trump, be against Trump, and honestly, I think no huge portion of people agree with me. I would probably say that my view is very prevalent within like the Democratic side on most of these issues.
>> Or at least people would agree with 90 to 99 to 90 95 to 99% of what I'm saying here on the stream. Right, who are on the left. So, if that's the true, then why can't you evaluate it based upon my position here? And we can talk about how if it were if it were my position, not some other random random position. So, let's What's the criticism of my position? Because no one is holding the progressive left accountable for their violent rhetoric and their violent actions and their descending into this Marxist communist hatred of society. I think >> guys should be doing it. You don't realize it. Trump has called for the some Democrats. Trump has said he's glad that some people are dead who just literally investigated him, like Robert Mueller. And And And also, he said that glad it was Rob Reiner's dead. So, I give countless examples of Donald Trump perpetuating that violent rhetoric. I'm not doing that. I don't think that we should engage in that violent rhetoric.
I think that violent rhetoric is bad and harmful for our country.
>> the rhetoric. You know the guy who did the Pacific Palisades fire was uh He was a Mangioneist, right? He He He loved himself some Mangione. You know the guy that burnt down the factory in Ottawa, California. He was also a Mangioneist. Like, I think right now, I think it's either Republicanism versus Mangioneism, if you if we're going to be perfectly honest. I believe in Jesus Christ as my Lord and savior, and a lot of progressive leftists believe that Mangione is the way. Like, we're at opposite ends, and the words the name that names that we're calling each other while we're trying to take each other out of the earth, it's it's inconsequential. Donald Trump did not like the fact that people were plotting against his presidency, that people were um setting up his um uh generals for investigation.
>> So, I think that that person is held accountable, right? I disagree with the person who's going to be putting houses to fire, which had devastating effects on the entirety of LA, especially because the fact that these spread across the entirety of LA. They affected the Altadena area, they affected up towards the valley to a greater extent, they affected a plenty of different areas in LA. That is obviously a horrible thing to do. You shouldn't do that.
That's atrocious. That person is held accountable by people on our side. You act like people on our side that don't condemn that.
>> is it atrocious? It It It served It served >> burned people's innocent people's homes.
>> Yeah, but it it served to inflict suffering on the wealthy. Isn't that what you want? I mean, if you're a mansion >> just affect the wealthy. And I don't I I don't agree with just burning the wealthy's homes. What What What What does that do? What What What is the burning What does the burning the house of a rich person do? What is What is the burning the house of a rich person do?
>> I I'm I'm trying I'm trying to get I'm trying to get to a specific point. If you believe that cap If you want to eat the rich and you want to If you want to destroy the rich, why not burn down their stuff? It makes perfect sense. My enemies make it perfect sense.
>> the goal is not to inflict suffering.
Wait. Wait. Wait. You're not understanding. You're not understanding.
My goal is not to just destroy the uh destroy the uh rich just because they're rich. My goal is to say that the rich should pay back to the society that made them rich in the first place.
It's just pay their fair share.
I'm not saying we should just burn down their houses.
>> I guess. Mhm. Yeah. Call me a centrist all you want. Engage with my view.
>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I understand that what you're saying is that it is wrong for people to burn down um Of course.
>> and Auto accounts just to inflict just >> The The The valley. Like, you understand that plenty of people's >> We got We got We we've it. Let's Let's Let's not talk over each other, baby.
>> I've I've listened to people talk I've listened personally. I've gone to places where I've talked to community members that were affected in these areas and talking to them about their entirety of the area that they grew up in completely devastated, burnt, destroyed, memories lost, their childhood lost for literally for for for the a fire that was that was horrible, atrocious.
>> I'm in agreement.
I'm I'm I'm in agreement. I'm I'm trying to I'm trying to I'm trying to I'm trying to I'm trying to I'm trying to I'm trying to >> to the fire.
I'm trying to define the line in the sand and you're kind of interrupting and going on a speech. What I'm saying is if you are a person who celebrates a a Jewish couple being unalived, celebrates Charlie Kirk, who celebrates fires, multiple fires, of course what you what you're doing makes absolute sense because you're the enemy of a certain belief structure. I think the leftist, progressive leftist, far left, Magionious, if you want to call them that, I think that they they they know what they're doing. They're here to inflict suffering on the wealthy and on conservative Christians. And me being a conservative Christian who's not wealthy, I think I'll just stay with Donald Trump. How about You can't say there are bad people on the left, the far left, which by the way aren't even in power to then say you support Trump who actively engages in this violent rhetoric and behavior himself. He's literally said that he's glad that Rob Reiner and Robert Robert Mueller is dead. He specifically uh called the some Democrats because they said to follow the law and not follow enough orders.
He's pardoned violent rioters who beat police officers and called them patriots. He's constantly engaged in this violent rhetoric and these violent positions. You cannot overlook those things. You You literally say, "Oh, I'm going to hold the left accountable for these things." Which by the way, these people aren't in power, but you're not willing to hold the right accountable when they are in power or are in power perpetuating these things.
>> Yeah, I'm not I'm not trying to um justify war of the words. I think actions speak louder than words. That's all. Um Donald Trump is going to say exactly the same things that people are saying about him. If you want to say that, "Oh, can't wait for him >> me to give you countless examples of individual right-wing people committing violence?
Wait, do you do you agree that based on FBI data, and agree based on federal data, that the far-right domestic are proportionally more likely to commit domestic in this country than left-wing domestic >> No, absolutely not. Okay, well, that's what the data says. You're just wrong.
What was the data? The data was from the the Biden administration?
It's from the Trump administration as well. Like left-wing left-wing violence is still less.
Yeah, that what they did What they did was they actually went into prisons and remarkably enough, they did not put BLM or any type of left-wing protest. They only They went into prisons and said every domestic violence situation between a white person was an act of hate crime. I will never trust >> said. Democratic statistics.
>> even know what statistic I'm referencing, and you're just saying that.
>> I will I remember I've I remember that Y'all keep saying it, but I don't buy it. I just don't buy it. I think that the Democratic >> Yeah, because because because it doesn't fit your The reason why you don't The reason why you don't buy it is because it doesn't fit your narrative. You look for things that confirm your confirmation bias. You look for things that confirm your confirmation bias. You don't care about truth. You don't care about reality. You don't care about actually doing what's best for the average person. You care about You follow your own delusions, your own narrative that makes you feel better about yourself. Yeah, yeah, like I said, I'm watching people worship >> that you can't accept that. I'm telling you the facts right now. I hope someday you'll be able to come back to this and you'll be able to be like >> lie. I hope you come back someday and you actually listen to what I'm saying right now. Because this is you just confirming your confirmation bias, looking for things that confirm whatever you want. And whenever I give you evidence indicating otherwise, if it doesn't feel good to you, you're not willing to accept it, even if the evidence indicates that. You're not even willing to look into it. You're willing to just assume that it's conspiracy [ __ ] simply because it called out something that you don't want to accept.
Yeah, but the thing is, here's what Here's what's hap- happening, right?
One, I do not believe that on the crime data statistics that um supposed right-wing terror is um more prevalent than left-wing terror.
>> into it. You didn't even look into it.
You just assumed it's [ __ ] Allow me to Allow me to land my plane, sir. Allow me to land my plane.
I've I've watched that statistic being brought up over and over again. They use people who are already in jail. They use white supremacists inside of prisons and they did not count Black Lives Matter, sir. That's my problem with the statistic >> Not true. You don't even know what statistic I'm referencing. I've been I've followed it I've followed this conversation longer than you have. Okay, so then explain to me what particular data set and show me give me a source for what you're referencing saying that they didn't include >> I told you Well, it's not We're No, no, no. The only way we're going to get through this is if you and I have multiple correspondence because I am not going to be able to do fact-checking over my cell phone.
You can You can look it up right now and then just tell me the title.
>> Yeah, yeah, I'm not I'm not in a position to do that. But it Here's the thing.
>> You have a phone in your hand right now.
I'm just saying Yeah, I'm just saying that the far right have has consolidated their belief structure into a violent leftist Marxist anti-Christian anti-Jewish anti-Israel platform and I being a Christian American lover am never going to see eye to eye with them and I think Kamala Harris was a secretary >> Kamala Harris supports that you disagree with? Um her platform was moving towards um blaming blaming supermarkets for price gouging.
Remember that?
Okay, so she wanted to address price gouging. That's How is that bad?
>> She wanted to have Yeah, she wanted to have a Marxist struggle session where supermarket owners were going to be >> It's it's a Marxist struggle session where she was going to blame supermarkets To say you want to go after price gouging is still a liberal view.
>> And she was going to bring them in front of Congress to have a Marxist struggle session just like they have >> in on this Tik Tok.
>> I know you people So So by the way, you're just weaponizing terms. The whole thing you were criticizing earlier that people weaponize terms against the right, you're just weaponizing terms against the left and not actually engaging in a criticism of their views.
This is called an ad hominem. You're trying to get rid of her credibility by trying to discredit her based upon calling her a Marxist rather than criticizing the actual basis of her policy positions.
>> Mhm.
Okay, um let's try this again then. I will not use the term Marxist. Kamala Harris, instead of taking accountability for the multiple incidents that caused inflation, she was going to bring out supermarket owners who work at a 6% profit and drag them in front of Congress so that they could defend themselves. That was her plan.
What did she do that caused inflation?
>> Oh, >> [laughter] >> oh, I can tell you incompetent things that she did. Tell me, what did she do that caused inflation?
Um why didn't she why didn't she support SpaceX?
>> What? SpaceX Not supporting SpaceX doesn't cause inflation. So, what did she do that caused inflation?
>> does. Yes, it did. They spent They spent 48 Wait, they spent 48 billion dollars.
They spent Uh I'm going to have to get the numbers.
They spent somewhere in the lines of Uh they spent bill- I'm just going to say this. They spent billions of dollars to try to bring internet all over the world, but since they were at odds with Elon Musk, they could have gotten it for 40 or 400 million dollars by supporting SpaceX. That is clear incompetence. Why don't SpaceX is the only game in town right now for transcontinental internet, and they could have supported it, but since they have an attitude against Elon, they didn't they didn't partnership they didn't partner with an American company. They threw blew away billions, and I think it's somewhere in the lines of 400 40 billion dollars or something like this. I got to check Ezra Klein's book again. The incompetence of the Democratic Party is legendary.
>> That's nothing to do with inflation. I asked you, what did she do that caused inflation? You could say that you disagree with her in terms of Starlink, right? But that doesn't mean that that would be an effect on inflation as a whole.
Those are two separate things.
>> Okay. What Okay. What about um giving large sums of money to New York, Chicago, Denver to to give migrants a leg up on society, which is pretty much why Donald Trump got so much black vote.
Like we in New York in New York we gave migrants a leg up on society. We gave migrants a leg up on society.
>> I'll answer your question in multiple in multiple platforms cuz the fact is >> want to know how she what she did that caused inflation.
>> me to answer question. Allow me to answer your question. Allow me to answer your question. Allow me to answer your question. Like we have three we have three spec vectors. One, she didn't make good partnerships with Americans. Two, they owe they flooded the market with cheap cash to take care of illegal immigrants. Three, they flooded the market with cheap green cash which went to NGOs.
Like that printing money causes inflation. It's just that simple.
So you have three vectors of Kamala Harris or at least the Biden administration printing money for votes.
>> Um okay, so here's why you're wrong.
One, they don't control prevent printing the money. That's controlled by the Federal Reserve. Two, most of the increase in the money supply happened under the Trump administration, not under the Biden administration.
Three, they signed off on less debt related spending compared to the Trump administration by over $4 trillion in the first administration.
Trump has signed off on off on over $11 trillion of debt related spending between his two administrations so far, which is over $2 trillion of debt related spending signed into law every single year of his administration. Yeah, what I'm going to say what I'm saying about this Donald Trump has a plan. He's probably going to use bonds to try and lower the debt, but we still have spending issues. What I was answering is what did Kamala Harris and the Biden administration do to raise inflation and rather than talk about how she gave hundreds of billion dollars to NGOs that are not going into any kind of productive labor.
Hundreds of Hundreds of billion dollars.
So, wait, allow Allow me Allow me to finish. Hundreds of of a billion dollars to migrants and and not wanting to work with Americans that she wasn't politically aligned with.
Instead, her plan to fight inflation was to bring out supermarket owners and chastise them in front of Congress.
That's her plan. That's That's why I call her the Secretary of the deep state. She doesn't even believe the stuff that she believes that she's talking about. She's There's someone above her that's telling her, "You need someone to blame."
>> You All you've got is rhetoric and just talking points. I'm actually trying to criticize these talking points and they can't hold whenever I bring any basic level of criticism, okay? So, what hundreds of billions of dollars did she put into migrant policy? Well, New York spent 7 billion dollars, Chicago has spent 6 billion, um Denver has probably 4 billion.
>> not federal policy. So, what policy did she pass?
>> the state Wait, hold it. Hold it. Hold it. You're not going to You're not going to try to um protect Kamala Harris from the Biden administration and their dealings because she herself said that Biden didn't do anything wrong. So, she's going to have to fall on her sword on this one. We printed money to take care of a bunch of stuff that we didn't have to take care of and the NGO and not bring it back to the United States.
>> Which But, yeah, but that takes that takes Congress to agree with it. It takes Congress. It takes the Senate.
>> law.
>> takes No, I'm talking about during during the migra- the migration of the 2020.
Yeah, that's under >> we're not even 2020. That's in Trump.
>> Yeah. Not not not not No, the No, COVID was Excuse me. After the C-19 C-19, we had the closed border because um of uh We We had a closed border during C-19.
It's not Trump. When Trump was removed from office, everybody flooded in because the promise of Joe Biden is the promise of American citizenship within 2 years. Which, by the way, didn't happen.
So, like you you're just like making that up. Secondly, I'm waiting to hear the policy where they gave hundreds of billions to migrants. Like what policy did Kamala Harris support and pass that gave hundreds of billions to migrants?
>> Wait. Wait. First of all, first of all, Kamala Harris will not be will not be um uh sequestered from the Biden administration. If the Biden administration did it The Biden administration did not put hundreds of billions of dollars into migrants.
>> But yes, he did. What policy? Dude.
Dude. Dude. How do you think Donald Trump raised his voting um amongst African Americans and Latinos? I want an answer to my question. If you don't answer my question, I'll just mute you and thank people. So, you can answer my question, please.
>> No.
The Biden administration's immigration policies. The Biden administration um policy on not um cooperating with American companies. The Biden administration >> waiting. What specific policy put hundreds of billions of dollars into migrants?
The Green New Deal.
It was >> New Deal is not a policy that ever got passed.
>> The The Green like After after Joe Biden was leaving office, they gave away money to NGOs, right?
They gave away money to NGOs. What policy? I don't I I Jesus [clears throat] Christ, I got to go chase after freaking paperwork for this guy. Uh okay. Okay. Um I'm just asking you. Like seriously, what policy gave hundreds of billions to migrants and what policy gave like hundreds of billions to NGOs?
And you have nothing.
>> What do you mean? Wait. What the What you're not denying that you gave the money?
>> I'm trying to find the name of the policy. I'll go on TikTok. Okay, I'll give you time. I'll thank some people in the meantime.
Um Justina, thank you so much for the $15. Thank you very much. I really appreciate it. Thank you. We absolutely are. Thank you so much. I really appreciate it. Thank you. So kind of you. Thank you very much. Jayden, thank you so much. I really appreciate the $5.
Diabolical.
Diabolical, I get you. Um as well as uh Mega, thank you so much for the $10.
Thank you very much. I really appreciate it. Thank you. Sarah, thank you for the $5.
And Noel, thank you so much. I really appreciate the $5 as well. Thank you very much. I've seen people to thank over YouTube Super Chat as well. If you want to support me as always, Venmo, PayPal, link tree in the bio, as well as the description of the YouTube, as well as you could support me over YouTube super chat as always everybody for the nearly 4,000 people on here on YouTube, hit that thumbs up everybody, it'll help get it out to more people. I would really, really, really appreciate it.
Zachary, thank you so much for $5. Thank you very much. I really appreciate thank you. Then these people always approach valid criticisms of Democrats and then don't apply any of that logic to Trump or Republicans and drives me insane.
Exactly. Thank you so much. I really appreciate thank you. Carl, thank you for the $10. Thank you very much. I really appreciate thank you. Thank you very much. I'm not quite sure what that would be.
I'd have to look I'd have to check.
Well, as well as as well as Feisty, thank you so much for $10. Thank you very much. I really appreciate thank you. Thank you very much. A vul girl, thank you so much for really appreciate the $10. Thank you very much. I really appreciate thank you. I know, right?
Amir, thank you for the $2. Zachary with the $5. Thank you very much. I really appreciate thank you. Yeah, it's really ridiculous. Ashley, thank you so much for $5 as well. Thank you very much. I really appreciate thank you. Thank you very much. Uh Brian, thank you for $5 as well. Thank you very much. I really appreciate thank you. Seriously though, just trying to own the libs and trying to draw a line between him and the libs.
Uh as well as Zach, thank you so much for the $100. much. Give me some dubbies for them in the comment section right now. I really appreciate it. Thank you so much. Give me some dubbies for them in the comment section. Thank you. Give me some dubbies. Zach, I really appreciate the $100 on YouTube super chat. Thank you so much. I really appreciate it. Seriously so kind of you.
Always good to see you, Zach. Thank you so much. Um as well as Amir, thank you so much for really appreciate the $5.
Thank you. Emily with the $2. Thank you.
Bridget, thank you for $5 as well. Thank you very much.
Thank you. Thank you. And Cal, thank you for $10. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Oh, Jesus Christ.
Okay. Uh um Yeah. Uh like I'm going to read you the headline.
Uh you're going to have to draw your own conclusions but the cost of the border crisis $150.7 billion dollars and counting.
Uh Washington D.C., the House Budget Committee held a hearing entitled The Cost of the budget of the border crisis to high end. Ultimately, it said that we we spent around 400 billion dollars on on the the border crisis >> in the House Budget Committee?
This is a Republican source. This is This is just Republicans in Congress saying this.
>> Okay. Okay. Okay. It's not like the Republicans are running the house right now. Sir, it's quite literally them citing FAIR, which is a right-wing, far right-wing immigration source. It's a just a think tank. FAIR is a far right-wing immigra- Yeah, it's a far right immigration think tank, anti-immigration think tank. Look it up.
Look up FAIR. Far right-wing anti-immigration think tank.
>> Wait. Do we Wait. Wait.
Do I have to accept your editorializing of their character, too?
No, you can just >> Do I get to Do I Do I get to question the data, or do I have to use a ad hominem that you're you're you're saying that they're right-wing?
This isn't ad hominem. It's I'm simply saying they're biased. It's an ad hominem. My guy, I'm not an ad hominem.
I'm saying that they're biased. I'm saying that there's a conflict of interest.
>> Yeah. Yeah. And that's that's called Yeah. You ever heard the expression if you can't pound the truth, pound the witness. If you can't pound the witness, pound the table, right? That's where we're at right now. You're pounding the the table.
Okay. Well, I I I just want to let you know that um I just want to let you know that the increases, by the way, in GDP are not even being categorized within this. Over the past um let's call it over the past or over the next 7 years or so, there's going to be at least a 7 to 10 trillion-dollar increase in the GDP simply just because of the immigration surge under the Biden-Harris administration.
Uh and that's according to the government themselves, a non-partisan source from the government.
>> GDP means you're spending money. It doesn't mean that you're making >> GDP means growth in the economy, which inevitably then will carry over to tax revenues, as well. So, in terms of tax revenue, it will create a lot more than $150 billion in in revenue.
Yeah. I I I I guarantee you I I guarantee you if you spend 150 billion dollars, it'll look like the economy is actually doing something when it's not.
>> Okay. So, you're saying that we're spending all this money. On what programs are we Did the Biden administration pass?
>> You're going to chase You're going to have me chasing through the internet for documents all over again when we both know that the Biden administration >> that they passed policies that did this, but you don't know any of them. Between Yeah, between Biden's spending on immigration, between Biden's spending on his between Biden not cooperating You don't know what the spending >> I don't I don't believe in the concept of democratic competency. I think they're just trying to buy votes. That's always been the problem with Democrats.
They try to buy votes.
You're delusional. You're not engaging with any of these points. You're not actually trying to use an argument.
You're not relying on evidence. You're relying upon your feelings. You put your feelings over the facts.
>> go seek out Yeah. You're saying that I I shouldn't listen to the Senate the the Congress because they're conservative. I'm saying you shouldn't listen listen to the Republicans in the context of the committee because you wouldn't accept a democratically run committee.
>> no, no, no, no, no. Would you accept democratic run committees in Congress?
>> the data. You're not attacking the data.
Would you accept determinations from democratic run committees that are citing far left-wing sources and think tanks?
That's a good question. I'll just have to see the data. I'll just have to see the data.
>> shut the [ __ ] up. You would not accept that. Don't act like you would. Why are you getting upset? Because I know damn well because everyone knows damn well you wouldn't accept that and you're just lying. I'm just I'm just going to No, okay, what It's really Christian to be on the live and sin. You know that you're going to be on judgement day judged for that, right?
Okay, wait, wait, wait. Okay, how about this? If the Democrats if the Democrats said that we had a aircraft carrier sank and I'm like, damn, that's terrible. And I look and it it got sank. I'd be like, fine. But if we got the the Mujahedeen or whatever you're Hamas and Hezbollah and Houthis or whatever one of your allies are saying that my allies took the capital. Yeah.
He just tried to say that I'm allied with Hamas, by the way.
Eric, I think you're the money guy.
Thank you very much. Do you hear this guy, bro? So, he thinks Parker get a job is promoting violent rhetoric allied with Hamas and organizations and and whatnot for no reason. He's just going to say that and he's not going to engage in any of my actual arguments. He's just going to say that I'm like the worst person ever, but like not actually give me any criticism of any of my views. I I I apologize. I'm just going to say that some skepticism is legitimate. I have some skepticism for the Democratic Party, um but skepticism to the Joe Biden's competency is fair game. That's all I'm saying. Wait, I I have I think it's totally legitimate to question Joe Biden's level of competency when he was president and running for president of the United States. I think that's important to do. But, I think that while you're doing that, you also have to consider that it's significantly worse amongst Trump.
Right? And that that was not true for Kamala Harris. And that if you really care about that, you would have voted for Kamala Harris over Trump. Maddie, thank you for the $10 on PayPal.
I don't think so. I think Kamala Harris would have just wrote more checks.
Okay, but she signed off on the >> think she has an idea in her head. I don't We don't I don't think she has an idea in her head. I think she lacks confidence. She was being led by the nose. I think you're only saying I think you're only saying that because she's a woman. Oh, really?
How about this? How about this? How about this? When President Obama was president and he wanted to go here, let's go I'm going to get universal health care.
The Republicans are standing in my way.
Hey, McCain, fine, go. All y'all, come into the office right now. Let's have this out in front of a camera and let's debate the issues. Kamala Harris ain't built like that, sir. Kamala Harris was willing to debate this. Can you name one adversarial interview that Trump went on?
Cuz I can tell you one that she went on.
ABC. ABC.
ABC, so he went on ABC interview on the Yeah, the debate. Yeah, the debate.
Look, if you don't know by now, a whistleblower said that Kamala Harris secured not only not asking questions, but also the challenge on certain questions. Oh, oh, oh, oh, of course. No, no, no, no, I'm talking about I'm talking about during the debate. During the debate. Wait, the debate the debate doesn't sound like an adversarial interview.
Okay, let me put it to you this way again. I asked for a single adversarial interview. By the way, Trump said he wouldn't do another debate against her, so he was running away.
Because ABC because ABC was not only protecting Kamala Harris from certain questions, they were also telling her they were also wrong. Fact-checking Donald Trump specifically. This is coming from a whistleblower my guy from ABC.
Okay.
That that there were people coming to our country eating cats and dogs, okay?
They're eating the cats. They're eating the dogs. They're eating the bats and the people that that's [ __ ] okay? That deserves to be fact-checked.
I would argue that he was not fact-checked enough because he lies basically every statement that he makes.
That's not the that's not the case. So, you could attack Donald Trump. I'm just saying that Kamala Harris was given a smooth ride by the media. I disagree. I very much disagree with She went She went on Fox News. She went on 60 Minutes. She went on Fox News and she left as soon as the questions got tough. It was Bret Baier. I remember that. She didn't She didn't leave in the middle of No, she didn't. She did not She did not stay for 30 minutes. She answered like three questions. It got contentious. No, she did not. I saw it, bro. It was Bret Baier. It was Bret Baier. I saw it.
It was Bret Baier. I saw the interview.
Yes, and she stayed for the whole debate or for the whole interview. Okay.
It's not even agree to disagree. I just think you're lying. But, that's okay though. You have no basis for your claim that you're You just literally lie. You make up things. You're like, "Oh, my my lie is just going to be evaluated just as equally as your statement that is factually true." No, no, I'm not going to evaluate something with actual meaningful evidence the same as I'm going to evaluate a claim that is based on utter [ __ ] You know what? This entire stream the entire time we've been debating you've just been spewing lies. without evidence, without justification, without knowing the policies, without knowing anything. You don't even know specifically what you disagree with the Democrats on. You disagree with the Democrats because of some over overgeneralization that came from Donald Trump's fear-mongering on Truth Social.
Mhm. Yeah. I look I I I I don't I don't want to um monopolize too much of your time. I just think that we are moving towards ideological um loggerheads and I will be at the side of the pro-American, pro-liberty, pro-Christian side.
>> That's our side. That's our side, not yours. And you could and you could go with every whatever Manjioni believes, whatever Meow Manjioni believes.
>> did that. Why are you being dishonest?
[clears throat] >> [ __ ] has, all the Manjionis and all >> doubt, say Hasan [ __ ] When in doubt, click Hasan [ __ ] He is a vile human being. He is he he's the he's the atypical leftist.
>> You support Trump. I don't want to hear that from you. You are such a joke.
>> He is.
He is.
>> I would pick I would pick How about this? This will hurt your This will hurt your hurt your feelings. Watch this.
>> If it was Hasan [ __ ] versus Donald Trump, I would vote for Hasan [ __ ] >> that.
I really do. I trust you would cuz he's a communist, a Marxist, an anti-Semite, just like I said.
>> Actually, technically, he's not a communist. He's told me that he's not a communist before. Secondly, secondly, hold up hold up. Secondly, secondly, you say he's an anti-Semite. I don't think he's anti-Semitic. I think that's wrong. I think that's a nonsense criticism. I have my criticisms, but I don't think that's a legitimate criticism. I think he's an audience captured tool of and Marxism. That's That's That's all.
>> [snorts and laughter] >> And you will never apply any of the standards that you apply to someone like Hasan [ __ ] to Donald Trump. You will never apply any of the criticisms that you have for any left-wing person to your own side.
You are incapable of ever applying any standards to your candidate. Can you name a single thing that Donald Trump could do that would get you to stop supporting him? Um not not not criminal.
Not criminal.
Um you know what? Um anything that's not criminal that Donald Trump does, I don't care anymore because he's saving my life.
>> there anything that Donald Trump could do that would get you to stop supporting him?
Well, it's like I said, it'd be self-evident that I don't support anything like uh egregious like uh like maybe you're like you would like for example like like if he if he were to unalive a lot of Democrats, I wouldn't support that. Okay, how about this? If you knew for certain that if you voted for Donald Trump instead of voting for Kamala Harris, that your daughter would die. And you knew for certain that if you voted for Kamala Harris over Donald Trump, that your daughter would live. Who would you rather vote for?
>> Sir.
Sir, I started the conversation is I'd rather watch my daughter die than vote for Kamala Harris. We started this conversation.
>> by that?
I still stand by that. That incompetent woman doesn't belong in office.
By the way, Trump is more incompetent.
Trump is more violent. And by the way, you would rather your daughter die than vote for Kamala Harris.
That's how sick this guy is. And it's not because he cares about the country.
It's not because he loves America. It's because he doesn't care about his daughter, it seems.
Genuinely. Like what the [ __ ] is wrong with you? You actually would rather your daughter literally die like literally die than than vote for Kamala Harris.
Than vote for Kamala Harris. As long as we understand each other. Uh Wait, can I can I ask one more question? If Donald Trump went up to your 10-year-old daughter and said he'd be dating her in 10 years, would you still vote for him?
Um that's that's kind of complicated. Um one, maybe okay, let's just say if it was 2016 and Donald Trump said that, yeah, I'd probably vote for him still.
>> Okay. If if Donald Trump assaulted your daughter and you knew for certain that that happened, would you still vote for him?
No, I would probably see him locked up.
Okay. So, I don't know why you couldn't draw the line with your daughter dying too. But if Donald Trump if Donald Trump killed your daughter, would you still vote for him?
We're talking about crimes versus words.
If Donald Trump No, no, no, if if Donald Trump killed Wait, wait, wait.
If Donald Trump killed your daughter explicitly, would you still vote for him?
>> No. No. No, that that would be an act.
I'm talking about You want me to get upset about words and then you're using acts. I'm just trying to see how about this.
So so it's it's like let's keep it let's keep it a buck. Like let's keep it >> to see how I'm trying to see how far you're willing to go for these things.
By the way, let me let me Dean wants to come up here and run this too, but um Jack, thank you so much for the $20 by the way. Thank you so much. I really appreciate it. Thank you. Good some dubbies for Jack. And yes, this is Dean. Jack, thank you so much for the $20. Thank you very much. I really appreciate it. Thank you. It is crazy, isn't it? Hamster, thank you for the $10. Thank you very much.
Like did Dean hear this?
Yeah.
Dude, come on, bro.
I I can't I can't believe what I just heard. You said that if you knew voting for Trump would lead to your daughter's death and that voting for Harris would not lead to your daughter's death, you would still vote Trump. That's one of the craziest things I've ever heard.
>> still vote for Yeah, I would I really would still vote for Trump. So do you mind if I ask you, is this because you think that if Harris were president, there'd be like something worse than your daughter's death, right? Like she would just destroy the country.
>> Yes. Yes. Absolutely. Yes. So how do you think that she would have destroyed the country? And if you could be like very specific.
Because because she would have been weak and her platform, I'm going to say it again, is to just buy votes from people who are her allies. Whether it's going to be Minnesotan fraud, whether it's going to be Iranian um I think oh, no, no, we promise we're not building weapons of mass destruction.
Kamala Harris's entire platform would have been to print more money to cover up for her incompetence. So by the way, Dean, it's Monday. I I realized that.
Oh, yeah, it's It's It's It's Monday.
It's Monday. It's Monday. That's Go ahead though. You can address that. I've already addressed these points.
Well, I mean, the reason why I asked him that wasn't to like restart the debate that you've already had with him, but more so just to see if like he had like really good reason, right? Like, you know, if if this guy would be willing to sacrifice the life of his daughter to ensure that Trump was president, you know, I would expect this guy to think that if Harris won, uh World War III would like legitimately start. Like, no joke. Like, no joke. Like, World War III would legitimately start. Now, um That wasn't the case at all.
>> Like, this guy I don't think this guy's This guy is willing to sacrifice his daughter um because he just thinks that she's weak. Like, okay, that's not really descriptive at all. I don't really even know what that means. I don't I don't know what that means for the country. I don't know what that the average American I I don't know what that means for the world, you know? Like, that's just really vague, really really elusive, and I don't really think that's like damning enough uh to help anybody understand why you'd be willing to sacrifice the life of your daughter to prevent her from being president.
>> Better better better one child than one country.
>> think that Harris would bring in the death of the country?
Yeah, I think yes. I think she's an office manager for the deep state. She's just a secretary >> I just want to clarify. You have certain knowledge for sure that your daughter will die. You don't have certain knowledge that she's going to destroy the country. What makes you think that she will destroy the country?
Look, um no, it's just that I don't It's I just I want to be fair to Kamala Harris. I don't think she's a bad person. I just think she's a drunk person.
I don't think that she believes in the >> She's literally not Trump. she says. I think I think she's one of those people that have an earpiece and is being told what to say. She's a secretary >> wrong. That was It's an earring.
>> She's a secretary.
>> earring. I believe I believe I believe it's it's it's not a it's not an insult on her character. I just don't think I don't think that she's a strong leader.
I She's not Obama. She's not Trump.
She's not even Biden. She doesn't have the courage of her convictions. She was incompetent from day one. People were holding her hand into power, and that's why I don't respect >> You know what's crazy? He hasn't actually given a legitimate criticism yet. He has yet to give a single legitimate criticism. Every single thing that you brought up is just literally utter [ __ ] And I just want to clarify, everything that you're saying is simply true about Trump. This is straight-up projection. This is not even true about Kamala Harris. It is projection because you can't acknowledge that Kamala Harris, the woman, is the better candidate.
>> Yeah, like >> Yeah. Part of what you're saying there about projection is totally true, right?
Like this guy said that that Kamala Harris would be like a secretary for the deep state doing somebody else's bidding. Well, at least under the Biden-Harris administration, we never had, like for instance, the head of counterterrorism step down because the administration was controlled by a foreign state, right?
You know, like Joe Biden Joe Biden straight-up resigned from his position as the head of counterterrorism because he thought that Trump was being controlled by Israel, pressured into starting a war with Iran.
>> Yeah, here's the problem, though. Um it's called draining the swamp. It was part of Trump's plan in the beginning to just get rid of people who are useless.
He appointed him into that position.
Hey. So, you're saying Wait, so so by the way, you're saying he appointed the swamp?
>> No, well, sometimes the the swamp was already there. Sometimes >> No, Joe Biden wasn't already there.
>> [laughter] >> So, sometimes people don't have what it takes Joe Biden did the swamp, and then he got rid of him [laughter] and everybody. He's getting rid of the swamp, but he put it there first. Guys, guys, remember He created it, then he got rid of it.
Remember Paul Ryan? We're trying to eliminate Obamacare, and Paul Ryan is like holding his copy of both Atlas Shrugged and the Bible. He was a handsome candidate, but he was a he was a swamp creature. The swamp creatures on the right, too, so they have to go. It's not that complicated, really.
It's like Joe Biden really was someone appointed by Trump.
>> capitalism and um Christianity, Judeo-Christian religious tolerance, or you're on the side of Mangione and Hamas.
>> [snorts] >> That's called a false dichotomy.
>> Is it? Yeah, you you think of reality in terms of like cartoonish views. It's crazy.
Like Like you just like you literally map reality to be whatever you want. You just You're like, "I can mold the reality into whatever I feel like."
>> you guys happy, the only time I see the political left happy is when they're talking about Manjione Yeah, you said the same same [ __ ] over and over again.
That's what That's my evidence. I only see you guys happy when someone is dead.
That's not true for You were trying to categorize the entire left as this way.
Actually earlier you were trying to say that >> are Hassan [ __ ] is Sir, you literally said earlier that I specifically was supporting violent extremism. I was a propagandist for violent extremism and defending violent extremism because I literally said I was antifa and against fascism.
I have a question. Yeah. I have a question. Would you ever break bread with a Muslim?
Under what Under what grounds?
>> Under the grounds of just loving thy neighbor.
Love everyone including your Muslim neighbor.
>> How about this? How about this? If a Muslim neighbor invited me for dinner, I would go and I would observe every custom that he's accustomed.
Would you invite That's called breaking bread.
That's literally breaking bread. Would you invite them first?
>> Possibly not.
And see this is >> I don't entertain.
Uh sir, this is this is why I say that I think that the right has just really misconstrued the teachings of the gospel. So you just sound idiotic when you say It's so crazy >> don't align with Judeo-Christian values and you do.
Uh Jesus was willing to invite anybody to sit down at the dinner table with him. Could we move on? last actions before his crucifixion was to invite one of the Jewish Pharisees um bidding for his death from Pontius Pilate to become one of his disciples. And you're telling me that you wouldn't even sit across the dinner table or invite a Muslim to sit sit across the dinner table I think that's the way he tries to call us Islamophobic. I don't Wait wait wait wait. Me personally, me as an individual, I don't entertain company like that. So that's why I said if I was invited If I was invited, I would go.
>> Jesus did. Jesus did. You're actively You're actively saying Jesus is wrong.
You're actively saying Jesus is wrong.
>> Okay. Here's the problem Here's the problem with trying to use uh Jesus as the standard when I said that Judeo-Christian religious tolerance >> Are you Christian? is what I'm going for. Oh wait, are you Christian?
Absolutely.
>> There's a problem with using Jesus as the standard and you're Christian?
>> no, wait, wait. Mhm. In a debate >> [laughter] >> Wait, wait, hold it Hold it, gentlemen.
Hold it, gentlemen. Hold it, gentlemen.
I don't want you to escape into scripture when we're just talking about actionable policies for a material world. We could have a church talk at church. We're talking about what is best for the country. Do you understand that?
>> Yeah. Like religion has If If you think If you think um a cross-checking and and and cross-checking and and fact-checking uh uh um Biden's policies is hard, how hard do you think it's going to be for the two of us to um open up the Bible and start talking about scripture? I try to avoid those kind of things. Thank you.
>> Can Can you tell me the first four books of the New Testament?
>> Yeah, good one.
Um not off the top of my head, no.
Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. You can't tell me the gospel?
>> I probably could look it up, but like I said, I don't want to get involved in a religious debate. This isn't religion we're talking about. I don't think you can. I said Judeo-Christian religious I think as an atheist, I know more about Christianity than you do. Uh-huh. I don't want to go into the deep water of faith. I don't want to get into the deep water of faith. I just say that Judeo-Christian religious tolerance You're literally a Christian that's saying that Jesus is not the standard.
I'm going to explain to you again the problem. I'm saying that the tolerance for Judeo-Christian beliefs is part and parcel to America. You want >> Actually, I think you're anti-Christian.
I think you're anti-Christian.
>> Look at this edgy Christian right-wing woke incredibly extremist individual, everybody. Look at this.
Look at this on the street right now everybody there's so many Christian actually they're all doing that Jesus is not a standard of truth and morality actually it's ridiculous these these people they don't love Jesus they don't love Jesus like you should they they don't break bread with everybody like Jesus would they they don't do that okay actually they're anti-Christ okay anti-Christian okay they don't want you to do what Jesus would do they're telling you Jesus wasn't so great Jesus is actually not the standard that's actually the devil okay I'm telling you it's the devil they're telling you it's Satan okay Cartoonish voices aside you agree with me that we're not talking about scripture we're talking about what's good for a nation I just want the tolerance I just want the Judeo-Christian religious tolerance that's it I don't want to open up the Bible and start looking through scripture with you Your view is incoherent like utterly incoherent I don't even know where I don't think you even know where you are ideologically Okay I just want pro-capitalism religious tolerance and individual liberty >> Religious tolerance wait he wants religious tolerance you just said you wouldn't break bread with a Muslim because they're Muslim I didn't say I wouldn't break bread with a Muslim I said if I was invited for a dinner I'd go out with him but would you would you invite them over I don't hold dinners Okay so you don't ever hold a dinner where you invite someone over If okay wait wait wait okay how about >> don't believe you Um what what what is it like there's a difference between saying Have you ever invited someone over for dinner how old are you No I'm like I'm 50 but like How are you 50 years old and you've never invited someone over for dinner what I don't know he probably I've invited ladies I'm a I'm a >> [laughter] >> I'm a New Yorker too many friends I don't know Well I don't even say that as like a diss right like I remember growing up with uh my dad and my dad had like no friends so there's never a function you know You you you you you just feel like a lonely 50-year-old I'll I'll I'll I'll fall on that sword which it's just more rational to say if I was invited to a dinner, I would go, but I don't hold dinners. That's all we're talking about. And I'm I'm saying this again.
>> dinners, would you invite him a Muslim?
Yes.
Okay.
Well, then why wouldn't you clarify that? Men don't hold Men don't party it up. Men Men usually outsource that [ __ ] to women anyway. I don't even know what the point is about Muslims.
>> You're projecting. Okay.
Okay, look. I Well Well, I'm I I got to go, but once again, I believe that Judeo-Christian religious tolerance, neoliberal capitalism, and individual liberty are the tenets of the United States, and I think the other end it they're trending towards Marxism, anti-Semitism, and um interpersonal You support a guy that's undermined, you know, the core fundamental values of America, rule of law, our Constitution, our democracy, our core fundamental American values. Though all of those things Donald Trump has undermined to a greater extent. He's called for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution. He's tried to to say that the election was rigged in 2020 with absolutely no evidence, saying that the systems were rigged against him. He's saying that our systems are not good in being able to determine who is rightfully elected and who isn't. He thinks our democracy isn't functioning properly. He's the true person that is anti-American.
>> Sir, you get Sir, I worry about what Donald Trump does.
You're obsessed with what Donald Trump says. That's the That's the difference between you and I. No, I reference both.
Yeah, everything that Parker just said that was like an action right from Trump, right? And also, you should be concerned with what the president says because they're the president, okay?
When you hold that much power, when you're literally the most powerful human alive, your words almost, right, become an action.
Gentlemen, I'm sorry to tell you this.
>> of the president.
>> Gentlemen, I'm sorry to tell you this.
I've been I've hated Donald Trump since the early '80s. I was not only reading the newspaper around the Central Park Five episode, but I even remember that 21 Jump Street where they made a allegory of it. I understand Donald Trump. He talks a lot of [ __ ] but ultimately he's a an American chauvinist. He is the id of the American people. He is our male chauvinist pig.
He is the devil that we know, and I don't want that to be supplemented for some Marxist um radical 7th century Kamala Harris isn't a Marxist.
>> that sure she's not? No, she's not.
She's not. She's just a secretary for Marxist.
Okay, so the deep state are Marxist.
Like you think you think our country is controlled by Marxist? Listen, let's just get >> No, I think real quick. I don't understand why I think this is provocation. Marxist hate Kamala Harris.
Leftists hate Kamala Harris. Socialists hate Kamala Harris. Okay?
>> they hate everything.
But they hate everything, too.
>> Every every brother everybody, okay, further left, okay, than like the liberal Democratic establishment either didn't vote for anybody, voted for Jill Stein, or hopefully sucked it up, quote unquote, and voted for Harris. Okay?
Like I just want to make that one clear.
You know, like if if you want to say, right, that anybody on the left is like a secretary for for socialists and communists, okay, well, then like point towards somebody that actually is a socialist. Point towards somebody that actually is a communist. Okay? Like point towards maybe like the DSA, okay?
Right? Like but like I it just makes no sense because there is a distinction >> It's not that complicated. It's not that complicated. progressive progressive liberals and then like leftists, which would include socialists and communists.
It's not It's not really that complicated. How can I put this? I think the far the far left, the leftists, they have such a high regard for socialism and Marxism that they don't want to say that they supported Kamala Harris. Like I refer to you again to Hasan [ __ ] who came up with the name Copmala.
He was so instrumental in Donald Trump's victory because he acted as a velvet rope keeping Kamala Harris from the golden club of socialism. He was the ultra-orthodox pure socialist that said that Kamala Harris wasn't good enough and he guided us Trumpions to victory.
So, I like when you have purity spirals.
I like when you have So, so wait, you you like Hisenhiker?
No, I like the I like Hisenhiker's Okay. [laughter] Okay, well >> Hisenhiker's His His inability to lead His His His wishy-washy beliefs. I love all of that because he's going to take the stupid people out of the voting booths where I hope that people will hear this and they'll realize that yeah, maybe that's something that we should consider when we're on the left by the way cuz that's literally what right-wingers think about you on the left when you decide to like help out the right-wingers. So, I mean you you kind of are actually making a point but you're not realizing while at the same time that you are the one supporting the people who are harming this country, undermining our values, and making this country a worse-off place.
Like you you're not the one realizing that.
>> I go through the same thing as I go through >> think the guy representing himself as your Lord and Christ Jesus Lord and Savior Jesus Christ is going to be your savior? Is you think he's the best candidate?
>> you that that's a little hyperbolic. I I never said Donald Trump is the best >> office in 2028? Do you think would you vote you want him to run again?
>> He's going to be in office in 2028. He leaves out of office in 2029.
>> Yeah, but do you want him to run again?
That's what I'm asking you.
No, absolutely not. Absolutely not. I like I like J.D. Vance. I love I love I love J.D. Vance, a Marine, uh skilled Harvard debater, a family man. He's Can you name one thing that J.D. Vance has done as vice president other than hump the couch and go to Disneyland?
>> Anti-fraud.
Like what specifically can you name?
>> Like he is responsible for the president's initiative on anti-fraud.
Him and Dr. Oz are going from state to state cutting off programs that are anti-fraud.
>> You you Oh, no, don't don't no, no, don't don't parse the with me. It is an actionable policy funded by the government to for him to go from state to state and cut off all of the um learning centers and and help >> [laughter] >> Look, I don't even know why we even make this argument. It's the anti-fraud initiative.
>> The anti-fraud the anti-fraud initiative. Okay, but like what did he do to perpetuate the anti-fraud initiative?
>> They're going around from state to state and cutting off um government programs like medical equipment billing that wasn't being fulfilled. They're cutting off learning centers. They're establishing uh checks and balances.
This is not an argument that >> Vance do? You're not answering the question. J.D. Vance, what has he done?
You said he's cutting off all these things. When did he do this?
>> He grew He grew He grew wings and and and rainbows came out of his butt, sir.
Thank you very much.
>> Exactly. You You don't want to >> all? Will that be all?
>> You don't want to answer anymore? You don't want to respond?
>> you're you're you're you're you're you're not even recognizing that >> what Kamala Harris did. She cast the most tie-breaking votes of any vice president in U.S. history, including a tie-breaking vote vote on the Inflation Reduction Act. Well, By the way, I can tell you more about what J.D. Vance has done than you >> Right now, well, right now she's making a tie-breaker on should they watch Netflix or Hulu. So congratulations to her.
Um Is this supposed to be like an argument? You you you decided to vote for the fascist racist and then he's like, "Oh, Kamala Harris lost. Haha."
And then he leaves.
>> Dude, that That guy was nuts, man. Yeah, that was crazy, wasn't it, Dean?
Dude, I swear it's Mondays. You're totally right.
>> It's Monday, bro. That's how it is.
All the crazies come out on Monday.
Absolutely crazy. Absolutely crazy.
Ähnliche Videos
Guess Which Country Trump Is Threatening To Bomb Next! w/ Chris Hedges
thejimmydoreshow
5K views•2026-05-30
Why Was There No Mention of Israel or Gaza in The DNC's Autopsy Report
wearefindout
227 views•2026-05-29
Trump Just Got HUMILIATED... And It's Going VIRAL
harryjsisson
46K views•2026-05-29
Potential Iran deal is 'a big defeat' for US: John Bolton | Elizabeth Vargas Reports
NewsNation
1K views•2026-05-29
Russia Clashes With Romania, U.S. And EU At Security Council Meeting | DWS News | AC1F
dwsofficial
344 views•2026-06-02
Independence Calendar (Episode #25) - With Cory Morgan & Keith Wilson
JohnBoltonAB
3K views•2026-05-31
BREAKING: TRUMP ADMITS HE LIED ON CIA
DarrenMonroePolitics
10K views•2026-06-01
Why Reynosa Is Burning Now: The Truth Explained
THEFACTFACTORYF
560 views•2026-05-30
