Paul Joseph Watson Is INCAPABLE Of Good Arguments

Added: 2026-05-09

[00:00:00]I got to talk about topics now. I gotta I've been avoiding it by playing Halo Wars 2. Mostly because I don't want to have to look at this man's face. For those who don't know, this is Paul Joseph Watson, and he used to work with Infowars, and he's been a meme on a bunch of channels. And there's a lot of people who thought that he just kind of dropped off in relevance one day uh because, I don't know, H Bomber Guy made fun of him enough. But it turns out his channel is in fact getting hundreds of thousands of views cuz he posts daily content. Uh not unlike I do, but that daily content has a legacy audience that really really likes being enraged. So let's go ahead and take a listen to what he's mad about this time.

[00:00:42]>> POV. You stumble across a group of people who look like this.

[00:00:45]>> I'm saying this as an English person.

[00:00:47]>> All right. POV. You stumble across a person who look like this. All right. So what is what does look like this? So, um, this one is a red head wearing a hoodie. Okay. Yeah. No, I see it. I see it. One less soul in the group. Got it.

[00:01:00]Um, this one has, I guess, cat ears, maybe. It's hard to tell with the blurriness of the video. Uh, this one is just a a dude with a goatee and a ponytail. What's What am I supposed to take from that? And this guy has hair that's dyed red, but like, why is that something that I should care about? Uh, so this is the epitome of [ __ ] boomer content, right? Where you known what somebody is going to assume about this group of people based on their age range. If somebody is younger, they'll look at this and go, "Okay, yeah, people dress differently." Weird. If somebody's in my group, I would go, "Okay, cool.

[00:01:39]Yeah, that's probably a group of either queer people or people who are trying to be edgy. One of the two." And if you're a boomer, it's like, "Ah, look at them.

[00:01:46]Satans." It's just they're just people.

[00:01:50]People are people.

[00:01:52]>> Get ready to hear some of the worst hot takes ever.

[00:01:54]>> One question we were asking, we're making a video asking 100 grits about Trump.

[00:02:01]>> He said Trump.

[00:02:04]What? What is that? What What is that?

[00:02:07]What is the What is that? What is the point of that? That confuses me. So again, it's it's lowest common denominator [ __ ] It is the kind of thing where they're not laughing because they said the word Trump. Anybody with half a brain can tell that they're laughing because they said, "Hey, we're asking 100 Brits this." It's a It's a It's an absurd premise for a video, but an easy video to pull off.

[00:02:36]>> Depends if you don't mind getting demonetized or not.

[00:02:39]>> Oh, it's going to get edgy.

[00:02:40]>> [ __ ] fascist.

[00:02:41]>> Come on. You can do better than that.

[00:02:43]>> Okay. So, there's a video that uh Movies with Mark made recently about how people go and become more and more edgy. Uh the the origin of gamer words basically. And so, I want to go ahead and point out something that he made he he made comment on in his video. And that was that when you get on the internet uh and you start trying to insult people uh for the first time, you're you're in a video game, heat of the moment, and you use the word jerk.

[00:03:11]Uh the word jerk, this is the exact example he used. You use the word jerk and the word jerk uh the guy just laughs at it because it's not insulting enough.

[00:03:18]So then you go with [ __ ] Uh and then maybe that gets a gets a bit more of a rise and then you start digging further and further with something that can be more insulting, more problematic. Uh and eventually you just get kind of used to saying that. I'm going to go and say this right now. I can't think of few things worse to be called than a fascist if somebody is actually using the historical definition of fascism. If somebody is calling somebody else somebody who exemplifies the actual ideologies of Adolf Hitler and Ben Mussolini, then that is a person who I don't want to be. That is equivalent to calling somebody a rapist or an abuser because that is what those people did in their own countries. They took away the ability for anybody else to have any amount of [ __ ] consent in and around their countries as they went on their bloody [ __ ] campaigns. So yeah, no, I don't see this whole like why don't you find something more insulting. No, they used the word that they thought was correct. And Alberto Eka would be right on this one, too.

[00:04:26]>> Ask anyone on the street and they will tell you the exact same thing.

[00:04:29]>> Go on then, say it. My co-workers tell me on a regular basis they wish he was shot.

[00:04:34]>> Honestly, yeah. Get Get better aim, you guys. I thought you should have missed what was it the what, the third time?

[00:04:40]Third time's the charm.

[00:04:42]>> Laughs in spiteful mutant.

[00:04:43]>> Third time's the charm.

[00:04:44]>> Yeah. Going to have to try for a fourth time, guys. Because you >> So again, what is the what is the appeal of that joke? They they laughed and then he just gives mocking laughter back.

[00:04:55]What is that? So I would imagine that he's saying you can do better to imply that he doesn't think Trump is a fascist maybe. Or that he just doesn't find it insulting. Being perfectly honest, this is why I say that Paul Joseph watching [ __ ] is just bottom of the barrel. It's barely commentary at that point.

[00:05:13]>> Really not sending your best.

[00:05:15]>> He's not popular.

[00:05:16]>> He's not popular. We don't like him.

[00:05:18]Therefore, he must die.

[00:05:19]>> The boats the people come.

[00:05:20]>> Okay. Now, that's not the argument that's made at all. And you know that anybody across the seas who wants Trump to expire likely wants Trump to expire because of the policies he's enacted, the way that he has acted, the fact that he raped children, the fact that he raped Eugene Carol. There's plenty of reasons to want that and none of them are he's unpopular so he should die like some weird contorted version of that one episode of the Orville where that was literally how they determined that people would die. Um again lowest bottom of the barrel commentary there is no actual insight given there >> on boats. This is probably the biggest issue in English politics or UK politics right now. What do you guys think about it?

[00:06:08]>> Rolls eyes in Reddit. They [ __ ] up their countries enough to come here and chill out over caused all of this [ __ ] mess for everyone all over the world and now we're complaining that they're coming here.

[00:06:18]>> Okay, so it's revenge. Is this revenge?

[00:06:20]Is this >> No, that's not that's not what they said. Nobody said the word revenge and they didn't even imply revenge. saying, "Oh, yeah. One of the reasons people have had to leave countries that have unstable regimes is because the United States and the United Kingdom have actively had a hand in destabilizing regimes across the planet. Uh, well, destabilizing governments across the planet, turning them into regimes eventually because it benefits us economically." And so, people flee to a safer place because it turns out that the place that [ __ ] up their country still might be a safer place than the country they are leaving. There's nothing about that that says anything about revenge. But again, bottom of the barrel commentary. He has to read into people's actions things that aren't even that are aren't even implied.

[00:07:11]>> Revenge is this revenge. They're doing nothing wrong. We should be proud of the fact that people want to come to this country.

[00:07:17]>> Also, that was a series of hasty generalization fallacies. So the hasty generalization fallacy is when you use an example of something. Hotel migrant guilty of gang rape and convicted murder. A bad thing. There is nobody who could argue this is a good thing. But when you show a thing like this, you are doing it to elicit a response. None of this happens in a vacuum. And the response you are wanting when you show something like this is for people to look at that and go, "Oh, I see. So that's what they're like." Jessica says, "So Epstein's suicide note was just released." Oh, uh, send me a link to it, I guess. But yeah, no, it's it's it's just a hasty generalization fallacy. You show an example of something in order to say that everybody is like this. So like, if I were to take Paul Joseph Watson's asinine bottom of the barrel commentary and argue that every single conservative commentator operates exactly like this, that would be disingenuous. Most do, not all. That would be very disingenuous because it doesn't encompass everybody. Ben Shapiro's method of of dealing with [ __ ] Matt Walsh's method of dealing with [ __ ] Michael Null's method of dealing with [ __ ] and Alex Jones's method of dealing with [ __ ] are all going to be different from each other.

[00:08:36]They all have their very own approaches to how they do [ __ ] So saying Paul Joseph Watson is emblematic of all of them would just be a lie and it would be facious. And yet he does the same thing here.

[00:08:49]>> Revenge.

[00:08:50]>> They're doing nothing wrong. We should be proud of the fact that people want to come to this country because >> I mean I don't know why they're doing nothing.

[00:08:58]>> Yeah. Free housing, free cash, and free healthcare might have something to do with it.

[00:09:03]>> So is the United Kingdom giving cart blanc free housing to immigrants and cart blanc free healthcare to immigrants? I don't know if that's necessarily true, but he's not going to pull up a source for that. So whatever.

[00:09:15]immigration to keep this country afloat.

[00:09:17]But there's no point stopping these boats. We should give them safe and skin and help them have a healthy safe life.

[00:09:23]>> A healthy safe life. Really, these people live in Dundee where this happened and where this happened.

[00:09:29]Another grooming gang, another city.

[00:09:33]This time Dundee driving the street again. Hasty generalization fallacy.

[00:09:39]It's not giving you information so that you can just have it in a vacuum. It is giving you information so that you will assume that all or most migrants are part of these gang rapes.

[00:09:51]>> They trapped 10 troubled local women as young as 16. And this is who the perpetrators were.

[00:09:57]>> They're doing nothing wrong.

[00:09:58]>> Again, it's it is this is just hasty generalization fallacy of the video. Uh also the UK isn't giving free houses to migrants. Asylum seekers or people who manage to get on student visas aren't actually eligible for social housing at all. Apparently, uh they are instead housed in temporary managed accommodation like hotels or former military sites while their claims are processed. They are given a place to stay temporarily while they are moved through the [ __ ] red tape and bureaucracy.

[00:10:30]That's not just free housing. That's the equivalent of being in a temporary homeless shelter. Some are nicer than others. Some are worse than others. Just like hotels, hotels generally are nicer than homeless shelters. But in terms of form and function, that is how they are operating with these people. I just had to look it up on the other monitor because that seemed like a bogus claim and I figured he was incorrect, but I wanted to do my due diligence.

[00:10:58]>> D where teenage girls are so sick of being >> Jebatique says just a bunch of articles flashed up with no sources or context.

[00:11:04]Right. So there's another person who uses this exact method to back up their claims and it's Steven Crowder. Steven Crowder does the exact same thing where he will flash up an article and then say that it supports what he says and then when you actually read the article it shows that not really >> prayed upon they're forced to resort to this healthy safe >> healthy safe life just not for the women and girls of Dundee nose >> right again your argument is that the majority of these migrants are rapists.

[00:11:41]You're just too cowardly to say it.

[00:11:43]>> Ring theory strikes again. Septum.

[00:11:45]>> Oh, they septum theory. The thing that has no actual basis in reality. I'm so happy to see it creep up here again.

[00:11:52]>> Piercing detected. Opinion rejected.

[00:11:54]>> We have the space for it. The government are just too scared to actually take that space and use it.

[00:11:59]>> Yeah. Not until every single tower blocks full of predatory infinity bomians.

[00:12:04]>> Okay. Yeah. No, maybe he's actually willing to say it. maybe I should have just waited another couple seconds and then he would have actually said that they are all just [ __ ] rapists because that is functionally what that statement is. If you say hey this building is filled with migrants and then you also say it's filled with predatory Somalians and your example that you have given are you know gang rapes then you're just saying that all migrants are rapists. That's that's just what you're saying. It is a facious statement. it doesn't have any backing in reality and the only thing you can do is point to individual instances of it happening to say oh look there is this very long-standing pattern even if the amount of times it's happening is functionally equivalent of 0.001% 00 O001% of the population coming in. But don't worry, it's indicative of all of them.

[00:12:56]>> This wrong be writed.

[00:12:57]>> And one thing I've been asking people is, you know, if they're proud of British history.

[00:13:00]>> Yeah. I'm sure this lot of staunch patriots. No.

[00:13:03]>> God, no.

[00:13:05]>> Yeah. So, what part of British history are you supposed to be proud of? Is it trying to keep America under your thumb?

[00:13:14]Uh, because we killed a bunch of you for that. Uh, is it taking away the ability to actually self-actualize from a [ __ ] ton of other nations in the area back when the sun couldn't set on the British Empire? Like, you can say that you're proud of what Britain is, but when you look at British history, much like when you look at American history, it's easy to not be proud of it, especially when you're asked to look at the whole of it.

[00:13:41]We have the the the UK has committed probably the worst crimes in history >> like on such a bigger scale and intensely than >> any other colonization that you could think of. Yes, it was really terrible how we check notes ended slavery gave India and Africa roads, railways, ports, democratic parliaments, property rights, legal rights, schools, universities, hospitals, medication, sanitation, irrigation. You know, we're so bad.

[00:14:10]>> You don't get taught in England a lot, but like we ruin so much of the world.

[00:14:16]>> They literally get taught that British identity is racist and that British colonization is on a par with Nazi Germany.

[00:14:22]>> Okay. But does does that refute what they said? I'm just curious. Does does that sentence that you said do anything to refute what they said about British history and what it's done to other nations?

[00:14:39]No. Okay, then. So, it ended slavery by compensating the slave owners. We >> and to steal all of their food and ingredients and we stole so many spices and English food is [ __ ] Literally, like we didn't do anything with it.

[00:14:56]>> That's a very very common joke about Brits and by extension white people.

[00:15:01]I've heard it a thousand times. I've seen it in a thousand places.

[00:15:05]Whether or not you find it funny, I likely is going to fall down to how much exposure you have to it.

[00:15:10]>> Like, it's awful.

[00:15:11]>> I know, right? Backwards England with its bland, boring food. They're literally eating fish and chips with peas.

[00:15:17]>> Oh, you say >> Okay, I'm glad that you're responding to a joke about that fun. Also, um, can I just say that there are few foods that sound more bland and boring than peas and fish and chips. It's just salted potatoes and salted battered fish.

[00:15:39]That's it. That That's all it is. It's delicious. I love it. I wish that Taco Max still had fish and chips so I could get it on Saturdays. But you're you're responding to a joke. It's a joke we've seen a billion times. Where where is the actual substance here? Where is the argument? Or is it just going to be a bunch of posts thrown in our face with no context as a way to justify random [ __ ] you've said, even though none of it actually does?

[00:16:06]>> Scotland is different from England.

[00:16:08]>> He's basically going like, "Fuck you, Scotland." And stopping any of like more progressive laws they keep trying to pass and keeping them in a very like rightwing. Basically, if Scotland wants to do something good, England says no.

[00:16:22]Politically, Scotland is a lot more leftleaning >> in the best possible way.

[00:16:27]>> And what best possible progressive way would that be?

[00:16:30]>> A lot of trans healthare >> locking up.

[00:16:32]>> Yeah, trans healthc care is good actually. But he's going to do the same thing he's been doing where he's going to flash up a random [ __ ] news article that doesn't say anything about what he's trying to argue. Parents who refuse children gender care face seven years in jail in Scotland. Okay. So you have found one area that may or may not I don't know the actual contents of this article that may or may not point to a singular incident where one person got jailed when they shouldn't have. Uh even though I'm going to go ahead and assume that by gender change um we're not talking about surgeries, we're talking about puberty blockers or you know wearing a [ __ ] dress. So the second line though, S&P outlines proposal to ban conversion therapy after self ID laws is blocked uh by UK government.

[00:17:22]Okay.

[00:17:24]How does this say anything about whether trans healthcare is good or bad? How does this say anything about that? Paul, it doesn't. Said our government has locked down on puberty blockers about the only thing you can do is transition at home. Hey everybody, let's talk about DIY HRT. Probably more important now than it has been before. Anyway, >> parents for 7 years if they refuse to allow their kids to change gender.

[00:17:46]Arresting people for using >> right. So again, changing gender. What does that mean in this scenario? You're just showing the [ __ ] article title.

[00:17:57]That doesn't mean [ __ ] JK Rowling could be arrested for machendering trans people. Pull warrants. P Warren. Is that Is that the [ __ ] poll board on 4chan? I refuse to believe that. I refuse to believe that. Also, if I if I remember, didn't we covered this scenario when it happened? And it turned out that what she was actually doing was equivalent of harassment. She wasn't just misgendering trans people asterisk like there was actually notable harassment that was happening here.

[00:18:26]>> The wrong pronouns and sterilizing children.

[00:18:28]>> Puberty blockers prescribed children by anist doctors who don't know risks.

[00:18:32]Puberty blockers don't sterilize kids. I I don't know how to explain this in any better way than uh puberty blockers sterilize kids at about the same [ __ ] rate that having a delayed puberty does, which doesn't sterilize you. So, it may increase your risk of being infertile, but so does wearing [ __ ] tidy whies as a guy. I don't Should we ban [ __ ] tight underwear? Now, also another thing I want to point out with this article, just from what I'm looking at on not actually reading it, just reading the title and everything, puberty blockers prescribed to Scottish children by NHS doctors who don't know risks. Well, you uh you put that in parenthesis, so I'm assuming there's some caveat there.

[00:19:20]Also, there's plenty of medications that are used in the market where we don't have a 100% understanding of the risks involved with them. And with all medication, there is a non-zero amount of risk that is there. There are very few riskless medications one could take.

[00:19:38]Everything can be poisonous depending on how much of it you ingest. Uh so looking at this um between 90 and 100 children received puberty blockers between 2012 and what I'm assuming is December of 2024 uh 2023 cuz this was published in 2024.

[00:20:01]So okay uh that is what 10 kids a yearish which by the way by the end of that they would have had a chance to study those drugs. Uh by the way we've actually done some pretty extensive studies on puberty blockers. The risks are as follows. Uh basically every risk that can be associated with late onset puberty is there with puberty blockers because they can enact that. Uh and there is a risk to your bone density that can happen uh if you are taking them for prolonged periods of time. So, you may need to get a calcium supplement later in life to handle that, which means um it can be handled. Weird that. So, what's the what's the point here? Because we know what they do now. We know the risks involved and we have a pretty decent bit of data on most of the effects that they have for people at least up to what 20 or 30 years, something like that. The only thing that we're truly lacking in regards to puberty blockers is data on the risks involved with them once somebody goes past the age of 35 or so because we just don't have a giant sample size to work with at that point.

[00:21:16]So, I'm not sure what you want. Do you want a world where no new medications are ever given to a populace ever and the only time that we can give a new uh maybe even lifealtering for the better medication to people is when that med has been tested for the last 30 or 40 years such that it takes two to three generations for any new medication to ever come out that can like help people in any way. Is that what you want? Or is this just being thrown up because you want something that seems like it makes your point for you even though it doesn't? I'm going to assume the latter actually.

[00:21:54]>> Children so progressive. Numerous studies have concluded that people with conservative beliefs are more physically attractive than leftists.

[00:22:02]>> Okay. And there's also numerous studies that show that people with conservative beliefs are more likely to believe [ __ ] they were actually worse at identifying when something was true. So why does that matter? Like this is I would say this is a superficial argument but it is in every way shape and form the definition of a superficial argument.

[00:22:28]Person is more attractive and is conservative.

[00:22:31]And what argument does that make? You you find somebody unattractive. Cool.

[00:22:36]Why should I care? Like why does that matter to me? Why is that an argument that matters to me? Why should it matter to me? He he wouldn't be able to articulate that.

[00:22:46]>> Conservatives have a higher threat/ disgust sensitivity while leftists, shall we say, subpar attractiveness motivates their bitter ideology that the world is inherently unjust. And >> no, I don't think that you can actually make the argument that um lefties are ugly, therefore they want to overthrow capitalism.

[00:23:09]There are cats that don't stretch anywhere near that [ __ ] hard, my guy.

[00:23:13]>> Nose piercings, funny hairstyles, and tattoos are also driven by this sense of spiteful resentment. Like >> Mhm. So, my god, that is such a stupid [ __ ] face to pause on. Holy [ __ ] what an ugly [ __ ] [ __ ] Oh, right. Sorry, I forgot that was your argument. Uh, Carlo Rose, thank you for the follow. But okay, so people get tattoos and dye their hair and do all kinds of things for all kinds of reasons. Some people do it out of spite.

[00:23:43]Some people do it to honor their parents because they died. Some people do it because of cultural reasons. There's tons of reasons why they do it. The reason why they do it, why why does it matter? What what argument does it even make anyway? Said that's genuine and literal ad hom he's doing. So he's done ad hominum multiple times by just insulting looks instead of actually going for an argument which I did as well in turn which I think is perfectly reasonable. He's also done the hasty generalization fallacy which we went over multiple times. He's also done a lot of two quotequ uh the what aboutism that he has done has been a lot of oh that what about this. Okay I didn't refute what I said. You just changed the subject dumbass. Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you exhibit A. And here's exhibit B.

[00:24:35]>> If someone said to me, >> okay, so pasty generalization and two quoquay together. No, sorry. Sorry. Not too quick. Ad homonym together. I What?

[00:24:48]What point? What am I supposed to be getting? What point is this supposed to make? me that I had to spend a week on an island, but I had the choice of two islands. One of those islands would be filled with British >> Is this Is this man or bear? Is this the man or bear thing? Is that all it is?

[00:25:11]Man or bear? Once again, choose bear.

[00:25:14]>> White patriotic men.

[00:25:16]>> Whoa, wait a minute, love. Have you asked British white patriotic men if they want to spend a week on an island with you? That's just a Why does he do that? I'm just curious. Can anybody explain to me why he does that? Like just I can't [ __ ] do it. This like gritting my teeth to say words thing.

[00:25:38]What? What is that? Because that looks profoundly stupid. I I I have no idea what that is. Said because he's British in the bad way. I just I'm just so confused >> cuz you don't exactly look like the life and soul of the party.

[00:25:56]>> Okay, what is what is the point of that then? Just h Yeah, we'll just throw insult in there. That's cool. That's why I've been insulting him so much in this video, by the way. I refuse to do the absolutely asinine stupid [ __ ] of they go low, we go high. I think that's a dumb take. Uh so instead, I'm going to use the tools of my enemy when they show that those tools are appropriate. The more insulting somebody is, the more insulting I am willing to be. The less they care about data, I am willing to care about data just as less with them.

[00:26:26]Granted, that last one I'm going to try to do a lot less because I'd rather be correct than spiteful, but still said, and I agree that he'd be shrieking like a harpy if anyone did personal attack on him even a fraction of as bad as he's dishing out. Uh, I don't believe that. I Paul Paul Joseph Watson has been in the game for long enough. I think he's got some pretty thick skin. So, is he trying to imitate a gorilla? Gorillas will flash their teeth when angry. Jeez. Ax says people who watch this guy also likely watch Butterfield. People who watch this guy are probably chronically lonely.

[00:26:59]>> One of those islands would be filled with Muslim men.

[00:27:03]>> An island filled with one white woman and a huge group of Muslim men. What could possibly go wrong? I can 100% say that I would feel safe and secure on the island with Muslim men.

[00:27:22]>> I disagree with that take. Um, so I do not feel safe being around a bunch of people if I don't have the ability to escape them who identify so hard with their religion.

[00:27:37]I don't because there just there's going to be a likelihood from the Muslim men uh that they will treat you like property because there are passages that talk about that. Uh and there are just as many passages in the Bible that do the same [ __ ] thing. But if we are talking about British patriotic men, we're likely talking about a bunch of people who are what? Chauvinistic, misogynistic, uh very very likely at that point just because the ven diagram sometimes looks more like a circle. I can kind of see where you're getting at where like one of these groups of people is likely a threat to you and the other group of people you can roll your dice a little bit better with. But still, but still. Uh PJ says, "But for you it's not Islam that's the problem." I doubt this guy feels the same. So, but for you it's not Islam that's the problem. Well, no. For me, it is it is Islam that's the problem there. So when if there's a hundred people who subscribe to that religion, they are all male. Um I do not know if I am getting a bunch of the chill Muslims or if I'm getting the unchill Muslims. Same thing if I'm if I'm told like this is an island with a bunch of Christians. Okay, cool. Let me just assume that it's NFB Christians. I end up dead by the end of the week. Like I I don't survive that week. Actually, I don't get a choice. If we're looking at both islands and we are assuming the worst versions of both of those, the worst versions of the Muslim faith and the worst versions, if we're patriotic uh British people, then I guess we're going with nationalists at that point. Like the worst versions of them are nationalists. Um I' I'd say both are bad. I would say both are bad.

[00:29:29]Says, "Either way, you're still stuck on an island full of 100 men. Sorry, I don't care if they're brown or white. I don't want to get raped. Yeah, you could just not just don't be on the island.

[00:29:39]So, man, what was the statistic? Like one in five women have experienced sexual assault, something like that. And like even if you extended that to well some of them considered sexual assault people looking at them weird uh cuz some of the studies showed that then you'd still like we can double the number then to account for that one in 10 women there. Now we're saying that there's a chance that 10% of those men might harm you. And you can't always guarantee that the other 90 men will protect you because most people who experience sexual assault tend to experience it from people who are close to them from people who are family or friends of the family and the men in their family didn't protect them when it happened. So uh Zora says so there's a chance that the Muslims are chill but no chance to get all the chill Brits. If we are taking the worst scenario, then both of them have no chance for chill. If we are talking the nationalistic uh British people and we are talking the very very the more like tribalistic Muslim population that you would see like in charge of the regime in Iran, uh then no. Uh if you've got an army of like Zoran Mandanis, then maybe it's chill.

[00:31:00]But then on the inverse of that for the British island, you've also got an army of chill British people probably. Like that's just I can't think of a chill British person right now because I just don't I think it's a fake culture that doesn't really exist. I'm kidding. If we're talking worst case scenario, you're right. But if we're talking best case scenario, uh we're not doing really good. Best case scenario, in either case, you're still dealing with an island of men. And statistics bear out that by the end of that something bad is likely going to happen to you. Actor says the only one that comes to mind is Constantine. I'm thinking of real people, not fictional people. Real people. Like if I have to be on an island with uh if we're talking real people, if I have to be on an island with 100 Zoron Mandanis or 100 Paul Joseph Watson's, I'm taking the Zoron Mondanis.

[00:31:51]I'm taking the Mondanis. I'm sorry.

[00:31:53]That's that's where I'm going. I there is no there nothing is stopping me from choosing that one. I'm sorry. No. So we're talking patriotic Brits, not just any Brits ever. True. True. Which again increases the likelihood. But this is this is the red and blue button scenario where it's it's a hypothetical to see where you think about something. But not everybody answers honestly until push comes to shove there either. I'll just say I can understand why women choose bear. It makes sense to me.

[00:32:23]It makes sense to me, but I'm not sure what I'm supposed to get out of this either. If it's just him saying, "Look, here is another ugly woman, but she's not ugly. Like, she's she's just a woman, and whether you find her attractive or not is going to come down to your personal taste." For me, I'm a glasses guy, so ballparks out there, but I also don't [ __ ] know her. So, Demi for the win. You're choosing Mudkip.

[00:32:51]Yeah. Yeah. You heard I liked mudkip.

[00:32:56]You heard I liked mudkip. Cheeseville, thank you for the follow. Can I have a permanently charged taser for this? I would rather have gun. Actually, if I have the option, I'd take a gun personally, but I don't know. I've read Lord of the Flies, so I don't like any of these scenarios. None of these scenarios sound good to me. You never know if you're going to end up being Porgi in those scenarios. I'm not watching any more of his video. We're at 35 minutes. I don't He's done with the part that I cared about. It's just a bunch of fallacies wrapped together in a veneer of being a snide [ __ ] which makes money. It makes money. I'm not going to deny that it is a very, very highly lucrative career that he has there doing functionally nothing. That said, I do want to take a look at the comment section real quick and see kind of what we're dealing with here. A table where no critical thought has ever been had. My guy, you're watching a Paul Joseph Watson video. Every stereotype has been verified with that group. Okay.

[00:33:59]Hasty generalization. My favorite. This are evil people who believe they are the good guy. You can't convince me that's not a goddamn bot. You can't. These pretentious, deranged weirdos deserve their future. Okay. Every side is going to say that about the other side. That's not a that. Okay, I'm bored. I'm bored.

[00:34:22]I didn't find an ounce of intelligence when I quickly glanced into the Paul Joseph Watson comment section. I'm not surprised, but eh, that's not an argument for or against him. His words are. Barking says she takes good care of her skin. Quite obvious even in the poor lighting. Yeah, like again, I just This is why Sargon of Akad fell out of relevance as hard as he did when he did the I wouldn't even rape you thing. Like because so much of their humor relies on them going, "You look like X, so I make fun of you for Y." It doesn't make any sense. Like if you actually scrutinize it, it doesn't make any sense because no amount of a person's looks denotes anything about their politics, anything about their opinions, anything about the most you could gain is like maybe some lifestyle things. Like if somebody's overweight, you're rolling the dice on, well, do they eat a lot of fast food? Do they just cook really greasy food? Do they overeat? Are they depressed? Uh are they looking for thyroid problems? But but at that point, again, once more, we're dealing with another issue where you don't know anything about the person's life from there. You still have a a sea of assumptions you have to make there. I just I know who this appeals to, cuz this appeals to me. This appeals to the me that existed uh 12 years ago. So 12 years ago thereabouts, give or take a year or two, I was very very depressed playing a lot of League of Legends and watching a lot of Leafy is here. And this is the kind of thing that I would have found entertaining back then because I would have thought the the catharsis of watching a person make fun of other people who I deem under me uh would have been really really appealing back then.

[00:36:16]Leafy here poisoned an entire culture of people. I swear to God. Uh Sagame Star says same unfortunately. Yep. Ax says do they have a disability that causes mobility problems? Yeah, who knows?

[00:36:27]though I will say with the mobility thing um mobility and diet only account for 20% of weight gain and weight loss.

[00:36:36]So a lot or sorry mobility only accounts for about 20% of weight loss. Um you can try to burn all the calories you want in the gym but realistically it's almost always going to come down to calories in calories out and the easiest way to control for that is going to be to eat less food. As evidenced since I have been on Contrave, uh, I've been able to lose 20 pounds because I've been eating less food because the medicine has helped me eat less food. So, or says exercise just means you get to eat more food if you're bulking. Yeah. Anyway, that's the Paul Joseph Watson video. I'm getting out in the weeds. We're going to go ahead and close this one out. He's depressing to watch. Hey, you made it to the end. I want to give an extra thanks to the patrons who allow me to do this full-time. I want to thank Aaron Rail, Astral, Britzkrieg, Gemshion, Poundini, Red Joker, Victoria, Jonas, Craig, Tar, Fireshard, Smiling GM, John, Dren, Haramada, Creeper, Saget, you know, I'm not saying that last part. Sylvia Snow, Valis of Sarif, Autumn Angel, Rooster, Rachel, and Fire Panda, who are all my $20 and up patrons.