The English grand jury system, which was removed from the English legal system around 1929-1930, was a constitutional mechanism that allowed citizens to hold those in power accountable by presenting evidence to a grand jury in secret to determine probable cause for criminal charges. This system, which Americans retained, served as a crucial check on governmental power by enabling citizens to initiate prosecutions against officials without requiring prior government approval. The removal of this system significantly weakened the ability of citizens to challenge abuses of power, as it eliminated a key democratic safeguard that had been part of the English constitutional tradition.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Indicted - what ever happened to English Grand Juries? The British and Roman Law.Added:
Wherever you are in the world, I am Graham Moore, otherwise known as Daddy Dragon.
Uh, what I'm hoping for is as many as people as possible, as soon as they see the video, hit the like button, subscribe to the channel. We wanted to get it well in excess of 10,000 subscribers and share because the only people getting this message out is you. Uh I can tell you when I go around the country and see different people, sometimes I can just be walking up the street somewhere I've never been before and people come up and say, "Is you Daddy Dragon?" Right? So bearing in mind I've been doing this a long time. um what the media try to suppress and oppress you. You are the ones who get it out there on social media. And when you start looking at figures and numbers online, they also lie to you. Um without any doubts whatsoever.
You'll you'll note that a lot of the people that got massive channels on YouTube.
Um there are exceptions.
Um Andy the Gabby Kabby is an exception.
Uh he built his channel. Um he has a great audience etc. LSB Studios and many others. Um but there are many others that though their figures are inflated the algorithms push their content and it is mainly because they are propagandists.
It's already been acknowledged uh via a freedom information request via Restore Britain uh and from my understanding a direct special.
Can you see and hear me again? Uh yeah, for some reason it went off. I don't know why it went off, but what I've got to do is put some other stuff in there.
Uh and don't forget, we got a big event coming up in June at June the 5th, 6th, and 7th at Mabel for right. So again, we're going to put that information out there. There's going to be some discussions going on. They're they're going to be important and I am going to give you some feedback on some other events which are going to be crucially important to the people coming along and some of the things that we're going to be voting on. Um so don't forget that thumbs up, share, like, and get it out there. Now, most importantly, hopefully I'm going to be able to show you this. If it goes off again, it'll be a pain in the ass, but I will show you this. Hopefully, there's no naked pictures on my screen.
Uh, this one, I'm going to get straight into this because I think it's really important. And it's also very important for me to talk about two other elements which I'm going to try and do now. One is uh I've just ordered a separate camera piece of camera equipment that will show these books and I'll be able to read it to you as I'm talking and then show you the actual book and read it out so you know because I'll be showing you a book itself. Right. And there's a couple other things I'm going to talk about in a couple of seconds and one of them is this one but I've got to go and find it again. Um uh and again someone said someone gave me this uh and I need to show it to you. The role of security services. I'm going to read this out to you in a couple of seconds. You'll be fascinated by it. But um hopefully everyone's seeing me. Give me a 5B5 on screen if you can see and hear me. Uh you can see this on your screen. Hopefully I falsy is evil.
Um, you'll know some of the people will note.
Oh, that's a bit strange.
Why is that coming up on there? Oh, it may be cuz I'm It should go onto a major screen. I'm going to show you on there.
Why is that uh coming up on there? Oh, maybe it's because I've shared the wrong thing, but I can see you all in the chat. Do you like that being on there, by the way? Is that quite amusing? Or you getting an echo? Uh, what I'm going to do is go back onto here.
Stop sharing that.
Go back into there.
Um, making sure I've got all that on there.
That's put on there. That's put on there. Uh, this is playing up tonight.
Uh, indicted. Oh, right. I can see what I'm doing wrong.
It's not showing the other screen.
And it should be.
Why is that not showing the entire element?
I've got no idea.
Let me put this on.
Uh, let put this back on. Nathan, what I want to know is if I can learn enough.
Uh, I don't know what that question was, but we'll look at in a couple of minutes.
Let's see if I can pull this up.
Oh, that it. Let's see if I can bring that one up and touch. Would it be on your screen?
Right. So, you should be seeing that on your screen at the moment.
Hopefully, I missed a couple of questions there and I'm going to apologize beforehand, but uh indicted conspiracy against the United States.
The link to this Substack is out there.
Uh it was also promoted earlier on by Andrew Briden on Twitter. conspiracy against the United States, destruction, alteration and falsification of records in federal investigations, concealment, removal or mutilation of federal records, aiding and abetting etc. David Moren has been indicted. And I do want to emphasize that um Tony Fouchy was Anthony Fouchy was given an award although he isn't a Jesuit was given an award by the Jesuit society. And if you read the oath of the Jesuits, uh, and I'm talking about the real oath that's resides in, uh, a university archive in Australia, it's not nice. If anyone wants me to bring that up on the show tonight and read it out to you, you'll understand what I mean. They do not like moderate Catholics at all and they want to poison them, kill them, uh, blow them up, murder them just as just as much as they do Protestants, right? I want everyone to understand who these people are. My point to you is tonight, this guy has been indicted. What does indicted mean? It means it went before a grand jury. and a grand jury returned an indictment. An indictment means evidence is shown to a grand jury in secret. And if they return an indictment, they are saying there is probable cause for an arrest warrant to be issued and a trial to proceed. Right?
that was removed from the English uh Jewish student system somewhere in the 19 late 1929 early 1930s and it removed our access to hold uh those in power to account.
Uh the Americans obviously have still got it.
There's other things going on. Uh Keen Charles the Turd is currently in the United States of America. But there's some other things that I want to talk about uh and I will be briefly probably coming back to this guy. Um this was one of the most well Anthony Fchy Fouchy was the was the highest paid civil public servant in the United States of America. Part of the seventh floor in a big big way. Right.
And people need to understand that for one of these closest confidence uh to be indicted is big big big news.
Now for many of you that understand why we set up the English Constitution Pie and the thousands of people that joined us. It was during COVID and everyone said surely constitutionally they can't do this. I showed you a card that we issued out to people uh and they was getting cases thrown out using that card. Police was leaving them alone using that card.
Uh the the the few that went to court uh the judges said no case still answer and kicked it out because we use the English Bill of Rights. So, I want everyone be and again if they hadn't it would have gone to appeal and the appeal court judges would have ruled in our favor.
Now, I put a little clip out tonight on Twitter and I want everyone uh to retweet it. It's my pin tweet and it's a guy called Sir Steven Sedley telling everyone uh that it was the English working. It was the English that freed slaves and it was the English working class that paid back uh the loan to the rough charts and we only stopped paying that in 2015. Uh, and I have a a very simple remedy to what's going on now, and I believe the only people that will carry out that remedy is Restore Britain. and that is uh that the the people in this country that are are black, brown, whatever color you want, and they're and they're turning on the English particular um after what we the working class of this country, particularly white people, uh have done for them, we should return them all to their native countries, right? for the simple reason we didn't stop paying that debt back to the Rothschilds until 2015.
And the only people I can see that will even bring this up in public and tell them is someone like uh Robert Low, right? and from what I can see his team.
Rert Low has also stated that he never had the jab that it he believed it was uh whilst a nasty cold um that the whole thing in effect was convid.
All right. I was talking to someone earlier uh and we was talking about the exam system in Great Britain and people being indoctrinated not educated and the fact that the exa exams exam system is a way in which once they have indoctrinated you get the highest pass mark when you regurgitate that indoctrination almost word for word back from you then because you've got the highest grades get the best jobs.
And really what they're looking for is people that have taken in the lies and them lies will stay in their minds and that is an that is brainwashing and indoctrination. It is the deepest form of propaganda.
And one of the comparisons I've made to the person I was speaking to was they did the same thing with COVID.
The mainstream media and the government promoted that it was highly dangerous, that kids had to have the jab, which we stopped, by the way. Uh that kids had to have the jab, that didn't need parental consent, that they could do this, they could do that. Uh that there's all these other age groups, lots of athletes, as everyone's seen, have been dropping dead all over the world, not just in this country. They persuaded to people you couldn't go on holiday unless you had a jab. You could you couldn't be outside of your bub b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b bubble. You couldn't visit your family. You couldn't see your loved ones. There were people in care homes and being looked after and no one could see the people who died and they died on their own. And they really believe that we're going to forget all that.
I have a message for them. Go and [ __ ] yourself. So on that side on a positive note the only person and getting back to the indoctrination they promoted in the same way as in exam system they needed to see if their propaganda was working and how stupid the public were. They needed to see how many people were not critical thinkers and the way they did that to get their recognition. They couldn't do it with an exam system. They told people to wear masks and then the mainstream media complied and showed the government how many people were wearing masks. Right.
The masks were completely useless. They don't protect against the virus. It's like trying to protect against a mosquito using um a a a wire fence.
It's just stupidity, right? But people did it. I'm very pleased to say that I did not do that at all.
I did not wear a mask. The only mask I wore was a COVID mask that I put over my my head and walked into Tesco's with it.
Said, "If you're going to [ __ ] scare people, you might as well do it properly."
Um, so what am I getting at with this? Not only has Rert Low stated that he thinks it it it basically was a SCOP against the people, he has also said that he would prosecute the people involved. Now you're seeing the first stages of prosecutions in the United States of America. I would love to be involved within prosecutions. We do have the evidence. We have compiled evidence. We have got people that will assist us uh with that prosecution in this country even if it has to be done as a private prosecution.
Who is the person that is pushing for that?
And the answer is Robert Low.
who is the person who is pushing uh not only and did he push but he pushed forward the rape began inquiries that he sat through every one of those um that he come to a very very very strong opinion that this was organized criminal behavior by the state and he is now notified the state uh that he intends to privately prosecute at very senior level and I hope it is for rape and torture using the Criminal Justice Act 1988 section 134 torture. Uh and there is a process for that which we've already used in relation to CO uh and we've got a court here in December of this year reference Charlie Staples.
Um if this all goes pear-shaped we can bring that case in the United States of America. All right, but there there is a process for it. And remember previously I have taken a British government to court in the European Convention of Human Rights even though I hate the place and won an injunction against them.
So, I don't consider myself to be one of them idiot free men of the of the land types that talk [ __ ] for hours and hours and hours and are doing exactly the same as the state and the mainstream media with programming [ __ ] into people's minds. Right? What we're actually doing is real. So, everyone should understand that this guy has been indicted. I haven't gone through the detail yet. I will be looking at some other stuff, but I do want to bring up some other bits on here and make sure you can all see.
Well, I'm going to show you. So, someone else sent me this, right? Uh, it's very old. Uh, in fact, it was September 1964 at 63, an original L Denning report. And it was a report uh presented to parliament by prime minister by command of her majesty September 1963.
Uh it was in and it was priced at seven shillings and six uh six p and it was in relation to uh the promote the profumo affair Steven W Eugene Christian keer lord aar and many other things but I'm going to turn because I believe this is important for you to understand before we go any further to page and if I had this reading equipment. I could bring it up and you could see what I'm seeing. The role of the security service 230. Now, I'm going to read that part. I'm going to read this paragraph out to you. This paragraph in in in context uh is Lord Denning um and the security services role in certain aspects, right? And there's a lot to this uh but you can understand the provisions that it talks about.
Right. So, paragraph 230. This is a law report and an inquiry report. No one can understand the role of the security service uh in the Profuno affair unless he realizes the cardinal principle that their operations are to be used for one purpose and one purpose only, the defense of the realm. in italics.
They are not to be used so far as to pry into any man's private conduct or business affairs. Right now, and I want you to think about this in COVID. I want you to think about Twitter. I want you to think about everything that's going on in the background at the moment.
private conduct or business affairs or even into his political opinions except in so far as they are subversive that is they should contemplate the overthrow of the government by unlawful means.
This principle was iniated by Sir Findlatter Stewart in his report on the 27th of November 1945.
Paragraph 37 which has formed the guide for the service ever since.
It was restated by Sir David Maxwell 5 in a directive on the 24th of September 1952 and reaffirmed by every home secretary since.
Most people in this country would I am sure wholeheartedly support this principle for it would be intolerable to us to have anything in the nature of a gestapo or secret police to snoop into all that we do let alone into our morals.
So that's quite a powerful statement.
There's much more to come from this. Um, and I can I am going to do a little thing about this and explain some bits and pieces.
But I have said many things and what we see was the power of the state being used against the people in a way that is shocking. I don't believe with certain judges, Lord Develin, Lord Dennin, with people like Sir Sir William Wade, who was not a judge, but he he was uh an an academic and a constitutional expert. I don't believe uh that they would have been out and get away with what they've got away with if them constitutional judges existed today. Right? They pass away sadly. I don't even think they would have got away with it with Sir John Laws and and I got to be honest, I don't think they would have got away with it uh with people like uh Sir Steven Sedley who who did actually tell people he was a communist. Um and he changed his mind after what the Soviets did in Czechisvakia.
Who went to Czechisvakia and was brimm and associated with the KGB?
Karma.
Who arrested Karma and Sadic Khn on the 13th of January 2018?
me, my colleagues, right at the time that is right, they never pushed it on because there was too many free men of land that infiltrated that group. Uh, otherwise known as [ __ ] idiots.
But again, just to make sure, hit the like button, hit the subscribe button, and share because the only people seeing this are the people you share it to. So, what we do is we predominantly do this on uh Rumble because the British have been trying to shut Rumble down. the owner of Rumble moved from Canada, uh, literally, uh, a province, if you want to call it that, but a dominion, uh, an independent dominion of the British.
And he moved from there to Florida so people like me can have a voice. It's the only platform I've never been taken down on. That tells you something, right?
And I think everyone out there should understand uh that YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, etc. have all banned me previously. Even recently, I was banned on Twitter. And all I'm doing is talking about the Constitution and about England.
So there are there are issues. So I just want everyone to understand that.
So I'm going to ask the audience audience's opinion.
on Anthony Fouch's mate being indicted, David Morans's, which I just showed you an image of.
Uh, what do you think of it? What do you think? And again, I'm going to explain some other things because I think it's really important that I do it. Uh, let me go back and have a quick look at this.
Let's get that out of the way.
Um, let's have a quick look.
Let me have a quick look.
Uh, let me have a look.
Uh, not sure if everything has come up on there.
I will go back to my main element which is there.
Ah something I need to make sure of. I have sent a few people tonight.
Uh some of this uh let me see if I can put it up on the screen. I'll bring it down just slightly.
Uh let's see if I can bring that down to there. You can see it. Hopefully you can see it on the screen.
If you're not, you should be able to.
I'm going to put it out there so people can see it. Now, there it is.
I have a max in.
Um, you got one, two, three, four, five, six. And there. Yeah, six on there. It's £15 a ship.
Uh, it gets sent out to you. You must send me an email.
It should have I have amein in the subject line. This is genuinely if this is for for the people uh that watch this show, right? I have ame in the subject line.
It it the email should then state how many strips you want and and it's a minimum of six strips, which is 90 quid.
You can have as many as you like, but I ain't got much here. Uh, but you can have as much as you want, right? Um, most people go for six and 10 strips.
Some people go for 20 strips. One person has had 30 trip strips recently. Um, and it's £15 a strip and then it's sent out to you.
You need to put your name, address, full postcode in the email, how many strips you want, uh, and then I'll send them out to you.
You must have Ivormectin in the subject header of the email. That's how I search for it and I'll bring you straight up and I'll see it. If you don't do that, when I do the search, you won't come up, right? So, if you want it, it's there currently. I've also got fenzad doll.
Uh, and we're also going to be doing some pots and concoctions using DMSO, um, castor oil, ivamectin, and fenzadol for some other bits and pieces and also some other I won't go into it tonight, but there's some other stuff that we're going to be doing. So there it is on the screen and you need to send that email to graham g r a ham m at protonmal.com.
That's the only one I respond to.
And then once it's sent out, I will send you the details for payment. And I am going to be setting up my other website again. So you'll be able to just point and click pay it and the money will come through. Right? So there it is. And it is only for my subscribers, the people who watch this, the people who understand what this is. Don't forget Ivmectin is a molecule. Ivamemectin won a Nobel Medical Prize in 1975.
It's known as a wonder drug. It does lots of different things. It is not an animal treatment. It is a human treatment. Uh and it is extremely extremely safe. Right? Um very very few interactions with other job uh drug uh drugs etc. When you look at at what they did to people uh meaning normal everyday people, kids dropping dead from the jab uh when there was no need for them, they were not at risk, high risk of dying. Uh the people it looked like that was most risk for dying from having a very bad cold called COVID were in their 80s. Um they destroyed the economy on purpose.
In my opinion, this was a sigh up against the people. So, what I am doing is showing you that. And just to make sure you can see it, there's 10 strips.
Uh, and there it is on your screen.
Uh, and that comes direct from the manufacturer. Them ones are 20 mg. Uh some of them be 12 milligrams, not in that pack, but if there's if I can send out the 20 ones. Uh and I will eventually have some 40 milligram ones as well, just to make sure you know what I'm talking about. So, I'm going to stop that now and go back so everyone understands what that is and you you can get something. I get what you're saying, but we won't need DD repeating himself unless the relevant stories need repeating. I meant hope that makes sense. Uh, let me have a look here at the green stuff.
Uh, change my picture. Dr. John Campbell talks about cancer studies and I met showing really good results. There's fantastic results. Um I know some uh personal uh I mean I can tell the stories but lots and lots of good results with ivormectin femad doll um there's about four or five other natural natural products uh that you can use as well. But again, ivormectin uh is technically a molecule. Um is not not technically a drug.
Uh it's anti a lot of things. It's also by the way ivormectin and anti-inflammatory.
Yesterday was a huge chemtrail day here into the right across the moon.
Uh, hi ancient one. Let's have a look.
Don't forget sharing is caring. Don't forget to hit the like button. Don't forget to hit the subscribe button. Um, and again, I only do this for us, right?
And and many of you have been with me for a very long time, have received this in a post. Um, it's already here. It's sitting there. I've just got to send it to you. Uh, that's it.
Uh, what kind? Let's have a look.
Uh, let's have a quick look. We had clear blue skies. Yesterday was Scorchio.
Today, Friezio. Check out the English concert. I'm glad someone else said that they're cold today though cuz I was cult. Uh, I'm now doing my um I am now doing three miles a day walking. So hopefully I'll get some weight off and I will be doing a fast again and hopefully getting that all the way down.
Have you tried these ones? Yeah, I do I do actually have these myself just to let you know. Um, I've also got DMSO somewhere. I use DMSO and I've been using it on my finger which is now currently improving my feet with all my cables around me.
Uh, so just to make sure that's there. I have a Mectin is great but I am dying of an Anglo bully gum from 60s. Can you help say that again? I was cold today after a lovely hot day yesterday. Yeah. No, I was freezing the day when I went out.
Uh, and it kept going hot and then cold and hot and then cold.
Uh, and normally stumbled across one of my videos on vindicator strikes back.
Uh, really worth a watch. Graham comments are interesting.
Oh, you'll have to show me that.
Uh, do you mean? All right, let's have a look. Oh, so vindicator is back.
Um, so I'm going to show you something else today.
Hopefully, uh, I can take you back.
Uh, I'm going to try.
Let's see. Was that 4058?
40 58. There's a very interesting element to this which I hope to be putting up on here in a couple of seconds.
Let's see if I can go on to this.
Uh I'm going to show you something else briefly.
Uh and then we're going to be getting into uh 4152.
That's right.
Now, let's go back onto this. Now, this guy is Steven Sedley, by the way. I've met him. Um, I'm going to show you.
Hopefully, you can hear this. But online currently, I'm hoping this is the one that's going to work. Listen to what he says.
>> The latter at a monumental price and compensation to the slave owners raised by taxes on goods which fell mostly on the domestic working class, and not a penny was paid to the former slaves.
Here too, the law can be seen making its own history. Not in the simplistic sense that as time goes by, one decision or statute succeeds another, but in the sense that the judges from time to time, and not necessarily collusively, determine what trajectory the law is to follow. If the trajectory followed by the judges on the issue of slavery was hesitant and unprincipled, it was not as is frequently suggested because Mansfield judgment had been unclear or equivocal. It was the lawmakers both on the bench, Mansfield himself among them and in parliament who equivocated.
Their cusonymity contrasts with what followed elsewhere in the empire. Here according to Mansfield's own doctrine in Campbell against Hall the laws of seeded or conquered colonies were required to conform to the fundamental principles of the common law.
Each of the American colonies took the opportunity of the war of independence to legislate either to abolish or to institutionalize slavery within its borders. that the practice of slavery also came in question in lower Canada which unlike the settled American colonies had become a British possession by conquest.
A petition to the Canadian Parliament in 1799 asserted asserted that slaves in lower Canada had recently embibed a refractory and disobedient spirit under pretext that no slavery exists in the province.
The petition went on to recite that the Canadian Court of King's Bench, plainly in reliance on Somerset's case and on Campbell against Hall, had begun granting Ritz of Habius corpus to liberate not only two runaway slaves would been apprehended, but as the Chief Justice had announced, quote, "Every negro indented apprentice and servant who should be committed to jail under the magistrate's warrant in the like cases."
Let me turn lastly to a quite different way in which legal history is made by treating inconvenient events as simply not having happened.
It's one thing and not a mere pretense to hold a measure to be devoid of legal effect. Quite another to treat a historical legal fact as never having occurred.
Yet that is how my generation and I suspect others too were taught legal history. Our lecturer at the ends of court school of law stopped in 1649 and moved directly to 1660 because everything that had happened between those years was he said a legal nullity.
Now this was not one teacher's idiosyncrasy.
In 1660 on the restoration of the monarchy after 18 years of republicanism, the public hangman was ordered to make a bonfire in Westminster Hall. Safety regulations were apparently not quite as stringent then as they are now of every copy of a number of Republican enactments and a search was ordered to be made for every copy of I quote the traitorous writing called the instrument of government.
And the instrument of government that was enacted in 1653 was Britain's first and still its only written constitution.
Not only did the protectorate which it created so he saying it was a completely codified written constitution which it was uh and what that actually stated again was it was against popery. Uh you could you you you could be any religion you wanted in in England. uh but the only government's element and you must uh promote Jesus Christ uh and he was our Lord and Savior right and and and that anything that went against that at the next clause um states basically stated was null and void right and that's why they try they've always ignored because the popes remember what I said earlier about the Jesuits >> foreshadow the American model of presidential government with a parliamentary override of any measures promulgated by the protector. It was palpably the source of a number of provisions of the bill of rights adopted 35 years later by another parliament which for so 35 years later the bill of rights what he's now going to tell you is all of the things that Cromwell put in that document was adopted in the in in the bill of rights >> protestations of legitimacy but once again unseated a monarch and was setting its own terms of government governance.
We all know that the Bill of Rights in 1689 declared the regal practice of suspending or dispensing with laws enacted by Parliament and the raising of revenue without Parliament's authority to be illegal.
How many of us know that 35 years earlier the instrument of government had provided I quote that the laws shall not be altered, suspended, abregated or repealed, nor any new law made or any tax charge or imposition laid upon the people but by common consent in parliament.
We all know that it was the act of settlement that in 171 created the secure tenure of judicial office which still underpins the separation of powers.
separating powers knew that it was in 1642 that the Long Parliament first extracted this principle from Charles I and in 1648 confirmed it by statute.
While many of us were taught at school inaccurately, my grandson I learned the weekend was taught it last week uh that the Puritans had abolished Christmas.
None of us as law students were told that in the years of the interregnum, Parliament had stopped the use of Latin and French in the courts, instituted civil marriage, transferred the criminal, probate and divorce jurisdiction of the ecclesiastical courts to temporal courts, and has stopped the routine jailing of debtors.
You won't discover any of this by reading the statute book. The statutes at large stopped short in 1641.
That is the year before parliament on the eve of the civil war began to legislate without the royal ascent. The next page is dated 1660. I quote, "The 12th year of the reign of our most gracious sovereign lord Charles II."
>> Now, basically what he said on this, I think I've probably gone slightly too far. Uh if I can find it on my um let me see if I can find it for you profile.
I'm going to show you this part. Bring it up on the screen. Uh stop sharing share this tab instead. Now again at this part and I want you to all listen to this carefully and tweet this out as much as possible. So Steven Sidley, former appeal courts judge, the English domestic working class paid the debt of releasing black slaves. We stopped paying that debt in 2015. Stand up.
Speak out. The English stopped slavery and the English paid off. The English working class paid off the slavers. We was in effect uh induced to our own form of slavery with a tax uh to assist the payment of that debt which I believe is absolutely disgusting because it wasn't a working class that had slaves. It was the barristers, the judges and the higher echelons of the British right and it was the British who tried to stop it. which had been given should not be forgotten with the ascent of the other three judges of the king's bench. Not only would the 14,000 black men and women held in servitude in England and Wales become instantly free, it was probable that the same had to follow in all of Britain's seated or conquered colonies where in contrast to the settled colonies as Mansfield himself was to hold two years later, the common law had direct force.
that this did not happen and that instead the judges with parliament's acquiescence continued for decades to endorse or at least tolerate colonial slavery is an embarrassing example.
>> Can you hear that? He just used the word acquiescence, a legal term.
There are four key words in the rape and torture criminal justice act 1988 section 134. torture. One is acquies, the other is consent, the other one is acted and the other one is omission. And they are or right. So which means any one of them and you're guilty. That's what they're terrified of because it's section six.
It's a mandatory life sentence of the law's capacity for moral cards in the face of political and economic pressure.
Many MPs had interests in slave plantations, slaving voyages in which many of them had stakes could return a profit of 2,000%.
Mansfield himself in the Zong case, some 11 years after Somerset's case, unblinkingly treated jettison slaves as insurable cargo.
As late as 1827, Ward Stole held that a slave who had lived in Britain and so had become free could be enslaved again on her return to the West Indies.
And as late as 1860, the English courts were prepared to enforce contracts for the sale of slaves in Brazil. Although abolition bills were introduced pretty well every year from 1782, it took Parliament till 1807 to outlaw slave trading and until 1833 to formally abolish colonial slavery. The latter at a monumental price in compensation to the slave owners raised by taxes on goods which fell mostly on the domestic working class and not a penny was paid to the former slaves.
here too the law can be seen making its own history not so basically hopefully you've just seen all that uh I'm going to stop sharing it again but then he's sending out because he actually so Steven Sedley is is an appeal court judge who basically has told the truth right he's at a law lecture at Cambridge and he the the domestic working class. They're the words he used. Yeah. The domestic working class paid off the debt and it was to the Rothschilds. Um and not a penny of any of that money. It only went to the slavers. So that's the equivalent of us paying off the Colombian drug cartels not to send cocaine here, right?
And then we normal everyday people pay that debt for the next 200 years. Right?
Yet we are the ones who are being vilified by these people, the English nation and the English people and particularly the English working class.
Vilified. Remember what Labour did when we had our English flags up down in Rochester? Um the people of Devon are really important in in what's going on with Restore Britain.
Devon, a number of of the uh Devon Lords and Dev and Devon MPs were the framers of the English Bill of Rights.
All right, we've again we've lost Middle Sex completely. I'm not saying we can't get it back, but what I'm saying is we've got to operate correctly as regiments to bring this back. For me, Devon is exceptionally important to England. Um, I would say it is now the star state or sh it it we need to take Deon back completely.
Norfolk, Suffukk, Cumbria, North umberland are crucially important. County, Durham is another one, crucially important and we need to take these places back. Lincoln is another one. Need to take these places back, right? Uh and then once we start on that, I believe we will be assisted.
If I told you that during the the Civil War, Americans, a lot of Americans uh were with Cromwell, right? And and and actually uh come and assisted Cromwell against the crown, right? Um so, and there's a big history around around that that I do want to go through and tell you. Um the English have always been rebellious.
The English do not accept uh fascism and communism. We are governed by consent. Now the other thing about Restore Britain and Robert Low. He is a businessman. I've got I've been in business. I can earn a pound note.
Right. Um but I can tell you now I I would not be involved with any form of system currently that is paying tax into a communist system.
We need to adopt the Hong Kong tax system in its entirety 200 pages which come from the addington act of 1803 1909. the or the same ordinances that made Hong Kong one of the greatest little nations in the world, right? They surpassed us by GDP in the 1960s, right?
And it was the British that betrayed them.
That's what we need to do.
What does that mean? There will be no benefits but there is an interim period only for those who he regards as British meaning Robert Low I regard as English, Scottish, Welsh, Irish or Cornish. Uh or in our instant dependencies, right? Uh which means right up close you're part of us Northern Ireland considered, right? um they will carry on getting assistance but no one else will.
Everyone could go and what what Rbert Low is saying and I agree with entirely and I have said this for years and years. This is what I'm saying to you.
I've never seen he's expressing things that I've been saying for years. Um I had another conversation and I'm going to try and bring it up on the screen. All right. Um and I'm going to read this out to you. it was.
Let me have a look because quite a few people have retweeted it. Uh let me have Thank you.
as many people as possible to retweet that.
Um and and if you want to pick that up and send it to Restore Britain, restand it, send it to Devon. I'll do as much as I possibly can to assist them. Uh thank you, President Trump. Uh not that one indicted.
Uh exactly.
We are now there's one in particular that I put out there I want to read out to everyone. Would you have me yet again when you go look for say it's not there.
Oh, there it is. Right. Uh this has had quite a few retweets. It's had about 30 so far. Right. I'm going to put it out there in the chat for everyone to have a look at. It's important because I'm going to read this out to you. So, I'm going to do I'm going to I'm going to bring it up on the screen. Um, and and and and then hopefully you'll understand this. Right.
Why ain't that working?
Right. Here you go. I'm going to bring it up on the screen.
Right. So, again, James Harvey, uh, I quite like him. He's only a young fellow, but he gets it. uh is on the screen as we speak. Right. So, I am a 22 year old and the prospect of owning my own home just keeps drifting further and further away. Last year, I had a private meeting with an estate agent who at the time was high up with reform.
He told me the truth.
House prices are unaffordable because of immigration. There is too much demand and not enough supply.
demand deport millions of migrants and the housing market will go back to normal again. Right? It you know I've got to go some to get this back to normalization. Right? And I can tell you the proper way of valuing a h a house. Right? Restore Britain is the only way I can foresee this happening. I agree with him. Right? But then I said, James, they need immigration to force prices up. They need benefits to pay the rents to service the mortgages, right? Do you remember when they had uncapped benefits? So if you bought a 10 million pound house in Kensington, you could move a load of uh people in there on benefits per and if they was on permanent benefits, the council would pay all of their rent, right? So, if that was, I don't know, 2 half grand a week, they'd be paying 2 and a half grand a week with it, right? Um, there's now benefit caps on it. That they need high house prices to service inheritance tax at 40%. Right? So, I'm going to start that again. They need benefits to pay the rents to service the mortgages.
But here's the kicker. They need high house prices to service inheritance tax at 40%. To backfill an increasing black hole.
Socialism is a downward only Ponzi scheme.
Inheritance tax is paid before the equity loans. Equity loans are a form of credit that our grandchildren are paying back. How do they do that with the increased prices of properties? Right?
In short, robbing the secure the future generations is disgusting. Right now, I want you all to understand what I'm trying to say there. If you get an equity loan on your property because you can't afford to live because your wages ain't high enough or your pension's not high enough, right? And there's inflation. You get an equity loan.
That equity loan really is a credit card on your great great grandchildren because they're actually paying for you to live now, right? Because they're the ones in the future that got to pay these massive house increases and they can't do it, right? So you've got to understand that the reason one of the reasons why they forced up house prices is because they have got an inheritance tax on all properties and that's one of the reasons why they've been forcing out farms and then said farms have now got to pay inheritance tax because there's millions and millions and millions tied up in it. Right?
Who is the person who is outright said we are going to scrap inheritance tax for everyone. Right? In other words, it takes the the the the the uh socialists funding system which which is criminal in a sense um away from them right now. It's not difficult for for us to reset. It's not difficult at all.
I've kept saying this originally and some people don't like this. If you void the act of union, if you abolish it as it never been law in domestic law, it would still exist as a treaty, right? Um but it wouldn't exist in domestic law.
It is in effect putting the British Parliament into administration and the English nation would come out of that with all its assets and its people intact. All of the laws that British Parliament made are null and void with it. Right? That means all the debts are null and void with it. Right? It is it is a real reset.
And from there you would then implement the Hong Kong tax system. You would then implement all of our rights would immediately come back to us. Right?
I just want everyone to understand of it. But the last thing that James Harvey said to me was never thought of it like this. This makes so much sense, right?
Because I've just explained to him in layman terms what they're doing. You don't have to get all technical. You don't have to do all these weird wonderful things to start talking about Bitcoin this and Bitcoin that and and whatever, right? You just understand that e an economic weapon is a weapon.
Uh, you don't have to. All you all you need to know is it is slaughtering future generations.
Did everyone understand what I just said? Hopefully you all did. Just shredded another letter asking me to get equity on my house. Shizzy 15. Now is that uh films his son. And remember when you get an equity loan, the tax man gets paid first, right?
Now, it should be that every all debts are equal, but they're not. And especially not with inheritance tax to the point that if you if your home is in probate and it goes through the solicitors, the solicitors will not pay you out until you have put a loan in place to first pay the inheritance tax to the government. Then they release your the rest of your funds. Did you know that?
So it sits in a solicitor's recurring interest in their client account and they say we can't release it. Right?
I've known four or five people that have been left properties. It's gone through probate. It's gone. Probate normally is when you ain't got a will. But even so, when before they pay the money out, they'll pay you in the money and you have to pay the tax man 40%.
I mean, I know people who have had to weigh in the tax man of 400 grand, right? It ain't only a joke. Um, and what they're doing is is they will take that money. So if someone you know for example and and by the way in Devon, Devon's one of the worst places for this, they've been targeting elderly people, the people in care homes, uh if they've got medical problems and are in a care home, they've been forcing them to sell their properties, right? They've been taking that money when in fact the National Health Service should pay it.
All I'm saying is I'm a free market uh marketeteer, right? I am a full Comanche, but I do believe in looking after the vulnerable, right? I I've got no qualms with that whatsoever.
And what I'm seeing is what these people are doing in the background. Don't forget, I grew up where my dad run his own business. He run two factories. Um, I can tell you a story. He took he there was a black guy that come to the factory. He was I think I've said it on the show before. He's a welder, right? Uh, he taught me to weld.
He's a lovely fell. My dad took him on.
Went racist. He said, "Show me you can weld." He actually took him down there and and he's in a welding shop. He's welding different things. He said, "No, it's all right. You can do the job." Uh, and he started paying him. And then a year later, whatever it was, next door's coming and said, um, you know, we got a CCV TV of one of your your people. Lucky enough me dad knew the fella. He said, "It's a bit embarrassing for you, but have you I'm not sure. You've probably never heard any of that, but the mic was muted. Um, so the b so the basis of it is the next door come in and see me dad and said we got CCTV. This black fell um he said one of your employees he said you've let you're letting him you know do the welding at the weekend. You're not here. We know it's nothing to do with you. He's shown me over over the fence and he's nicking out stuff, putting in his M and driving off and obviously right. So me dad's gone down there and said, "Right, you're sacked.
I've just seen what's going on and all that, you know." And he gave him a chance. He was a good welder though. He taught me out of the world. And my whole point is, yeah. Um, you know, my my my dad was was, you know, he was always fair and and he's give the he's always worked on the lathe and my dad 100% is not a thief, right? He's like, you know, if you're going to graft, I'll pay you. If you ain't, [ __ ] off, right? Um, so all I'm doing is is just explaining to you um, you know, these these weird situations that they say. Uh, just to let you know, right? Uh, gone off.
Rumble, black screen. Yeah, it should be back on now. You're probably on a bit more. Do you need a mic monitor app?
What's a mic monitor app?
Uh, on. It's just I click the button for the mic to come on and it and it and it don't there's a bit of a delay with the clicks. It might even be because this is needs us clean. Um give them an answer they take on my old DD. That's what I'm saying to you. It's not I mean like I say my dad's a really lovely fellow. By the way, I spoke to me dad today first time in ages cuz his ears have been blocked and they had to get and he didn't want to get the National Health Service to come out to him and do an earring test.
He was getting all depressed cuz he couldn't hear nothing and he's only got one ear anyway. Um but anyway, today they cleaned all his ear out and gave him an ear and tuned it all in from him.
Uh put the hearing aid on and and hey press so I run him up said all right how you doing?
He said I can hear again. So yeah it was quite funny.
Uh but there you go. Shield purse. So, all I'm saying to everyone tonight, I've shown you a few little bits. Uh there's more I wanted to go through again from this this old book here, which again is uh I might finish with this just to show you. This one is from I'm sure it was uh 17 uh 1784 or 1788, right? But I'll read this out. This is the Constitution of England, right? When I get this other thing, I'll bring it up on the screen and I'll and and again, right in the book, I'm going to be using some of this stuff and putting it in there, right?
But what he says is in particular with this um he goes into I think it's on there, right? So, I'll read this out to you. written in his history of the common law to prove that in the few cases in which the civil law is admitted in England, it can have no power by virtue of any deference due to the orders of Justinian. A truth which certainly had no need of proof. We plainly see, don't forget this is an original, right? Uh calf lever 1788 I think it was written, right? um it can have no power by virtue of any difference due to the orders of Justinian. Right? We plainly see that this chief justice who is also a very great lawyer had in his in this respect retained somewhat of the heat of the party.
Even at present, the English lawyers attribute the liberty, the liberty they enjoy and of which other nations are deprived to their having rejected while those nations have admitted the Roman law which is mistaken the effect for the cause. It is not because the English have rejected Roman laws that they are free. But it is because they were free or at least because there existed among them causes which were in process of time to make them so that they have been able to reject the Roman laws.
But even though they had admitted those laws, the same circumstances that have enabled them to reject the whole would have likewise enabled them to reject those parts which might not have suited them. And they would have seen that it is very possible to receive the def the the decisions uh of the civil law on the subject of servitudes.
Bana and Rush. There's some weird stuff, but it's written in Latin. Without adopting its principles with respect to the power of the emperors of this, the Republic of Holland, where the civil law is adopted, would afford a proof if there were not the still uh still more striking one of the emperor of Germany.
Do you remember when I talked to you about uh there's the there's the Holy Roman Empire and the Holy Roman Sea? The Holy Roman Empire is associated with the Jesuits, right?
And it's German. Uh who though in the opinions of his people, he is the successor to the very throne of Caesar.
Did you hear that bit?
So the emperor of Germany who though in the opinions of his people he is the successor to the very throne of Caesar B has not by a great deal so much power as king of England. And the reading of the several treaties which deprived him of the power of nominating the principal offices of the empire sufficiently shows that a spirit of unlimited submission to the monle power is no is no necessary consequence of the admission of Roman civil law. The laws therefore that have taken place in England are what they call the unwritten law also termed the common law and the statute laws. The unwritten law is thus called not because it is only transmitted by tradition from generation to generation but because it is not founded on any known act of legis. It receives its force from immemorial custom and for the most part derives its origin from a what particularly frightens the English lawyers blah blah blah uh acts of parliament enacted in the times which immediately followed the conquest particularly those anterior to the time of Richard I the originals of which are lost the principal objects settled by the common law are the rules of descent, the different methods of acquiring property. Do you remember when I said to you that we have something in a common law which is an ancient custom and it is called fee simple absolute right which means you are sovereign on that land.
Uh the various forms required for rendering contracts valid in all which points it differs or more or less uh from the civil war. Thus by the common law lands descend to the eldest son to the exclusion of all his brothers and sisters. Whereas by the civil law they are equally divided between all the children. By the common law property is transferred by writing but by the civil law tradition or actual delivery is more often uh more over requisite etc. Um, and then it goes in tells you all about the common law, different bits and pieces. Um, and again, well, just to make sure, I just want to make sure you get this bit because I think it's important, but hopefully I've got it there. Uh, God forbid, however, I sh I should me for the people of England so fatally tied down to inaction by the nature of their government that they cannot in times of oppression find means of appointing a leader. Well, we just have Robert Low, right? Um, and again, we need to act as regiments. Uh, we go back to our shiers.
Uh, when you read all these documents, it's all about shi sh. There's a few counties in there, but it's all about shers and we need to keep pushing forward.
That's it. So, don't forget I am going to leave you with this. Go back to that one thing. Let me see if I can see if anyone said anything on the uh dog and bone. Uh let's have a look.
Uh I am muted.
Uh I'm no longer muted. Uh, let me make sure that everyone's got it there. So, don't forget, I'm going to say this one more time. Uh, I'm going to put this on there.
If you want any uh, and there it is. Put it up on there.
If you want any uh, I send me an email.
Here it go. He's on the screen. Send me an email. It is 15 pound a strip.
Minimum is six strips and it's 15 pound a strip. Put either me in in the subject of the email subject line of the email.
Then in the main part of the email um you put how many strips you want. You can have as many as you want and then you put your name, address, and postcode and I will send them to you.
Uh, and then obviously you pay me in in the account details that I'll send you on the email. That's it. Um, so these one particular ones that I've got here, some are 12 mig, some are 20 milligrams.
Hoping to get some 40 milligrams in. Um, and just to let you know, that's it. So, I'm going to say uh good night, God bless. Hopefully. And don't forget to send the email to Graeme G R A H A More M O R E Protonm.com.
I'm sure someone will put it in the chat for everyone just to make sure they can see that. Um, that's it. Uh, don't forget what I believe in. The Constitution is the solution. give as much support as possible uh to restore Britain, which also means restore England, which also means restore Devon, which also means restore London, which also means restore Middle Sex. If you're going to take the country back, do it properly. And I believe we are going to do it properly.
We've had enough. And it's time for the people to rise. That's it. God bless and I will see you tomorrow evening at 8:00 p.m.
Chilly pool.
Related Videos
BREAKING: Judge Kathleen Issues Emergency Arrest Warrant After Trump Defies Order
Frontora
2K views•2026-05-29
8 Hidden Things About Mackenzie Shirilla Netflix's 'The Crash' Didn't Show You
MarvelousVideos
2K views•2026-05-28
MP Garnett Genuis warns Canada’s MAiD system has ‘gone too far’
WesternStandard
187 views•2026-05-28
THE STREISAND EFFECT AT BARBARA STREISAND’S HOUSE! - First Amendment Audit
KULTNEWS
1K views•2026-05-30
Trump Impeachment STORM IGNITES as 29 Judges Vote for Conviction!!
DanielBriefDaily
2K views•2026-06-02
EBK Jaaybo Won’t Be Going To Trial?! | Criminal Lawyer Reacts
floridadefenseteam
404 views•2026-05-29
OFFICE HOURS: The Theft of Black Brilliance... AI and Intellectual Property (w/ Lisa E. Davis)
marclamonthillnetwork
2K views•2026-05-29
सुप्रीम कोर्ट में 5 जजों का शपथग्रहण समारोह #supremecourt #judges #oathceremony #shorts #ytshorts
Bharat24Liv
4K views•2026-06-02











