The video perfectly exposes the gap between pseudo-intellectual arrogance and the reality of the law. It is a satisfying lesson in how courtroom procedures easily dismantle hollow legal theories.
Deep Dive
Voraussetzung
- Keine Daten verfügbar.
Nächste Schritte
- Keine Daten verfügbar.
Deep Dive
Sovereign Citizen Thinks He Had A Mic Drop Moment (He Didn't)Hinzugefügt:
Your honor, we could call Mr. Noel.
>> Court call Benjamin Noel 25M 641.
Mr. Contrarus.
>> Yes, your honor. So, I spoke with Mr. Noel. I'm not sure what he's talking about. I know he didn't complete the 24 hours of community service. He informed me of that. Uh he then indicated that he's wants this case dismissed against him. Um, I'm just asking due to the fact that the community service has not been completed that the fine be imposed. He did complete the classes, but we did suspend a fine and so I would just ask that that fine be imposed.
>> Mr. Noel, >> your position? Um I would like to request a dismissal of it because um my constitutional rights um if the state is part of the case um they are supposed to extend they have no choice to a supreme court for one thing. The other thing, the times that I was arrested, they can only arrest me by grand jury, not by hearsay from a single party.
>> Well, you plead guilty here, so >> yes, I know that >> under distress.
>> Okay, I'm going to go ahead and grant that people leave to file a complaint to revoke probation. This wouldn't be one where I would just impose the fine if he's against it. Once that happens, you'll get another court date. You can um apply for the public defender. They can file additional motions. Um there are certain things that you can certainly allege. Uh the court will deny those motions at this time. Those are things you can do in writing and the people will file a complaint to revoke.
Okay.
>> Okay.
>> You'll get another court date in the mail.
>> Okay.
>> Thank you. I want to make you very aware too that um Executive Order 13818, if you're familiar with it.
>> I'm not.
>> Okay. You maybe you should uh take the time to look that up.
>> What's the What is it?
>> Executive Order 13818.
>> And who issued it?
>> Uh Donald Trump.
>> And you think it pertains to your case 13818? Of course it does because it means that all government or state officials like everybody here um are supposed to cease and desist.
>> What am I supposed to cease and desist?
So what do I need?
>> Well, I'm just going to file a revocation at this point.
>> Okay. And so they'll send me >> Yeah. And you'll be able to apply for a public defender. Okay. Sounds good.
Did you get the cord?
>> Okay.
Oh my god. This is Zach's fault.
I looked He sent this during the last stream. I know. I've streamed 400 times today. I'm like, I have to do it. I have to do it. It's just too good.
It is too good. Yeah. I mean, you know, he's he's citing Donald Trump on an executive order for whatever his case is.
It's beautiful, but we've got more.
>> All right. All right, folks. Thank you for your uh time. It's 26 CR4 and we're back on the record. Um it's been um the baleiff has in informed me that uh this jury has reached a verdict. Is that right? Okay. And who is the four person?
>> Okay. Uh is that the verdict in in uh that envelope, please? All right, sir.
Would you please grab that?
Also, MG uh MGT is to blame for some of this.
There's a bit of a spoiler alert here.
He doesn't like the verdict.
>> Thank you, sir.
For the record, the defendant is appearing by WebEx. Um, court will read the verdicts as follows.
Jury verdict count number one. We the jury find the defendant Trenton N.
Hammerstrom guilty of count number one menacing.
As to the verdict question, did the prosecution prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the menacing was committed by the use of a firearm, knife, or budgeon, or by the use of a simulated firearm, knife, or budgeon? Answer, yes or no.
Answer, yes. Four person signs.
Jury verdict count two. We the jury find the defendant Trenton N. Hammerstrom guilty of count number two, assault in the third degree knowingly or recklessly. Four person signed. Um madam poor person, is that uh your verdict?
>> Yes.
>> Okay. Um and um we need the microphone.
I'm just going to pull the jury um as well. So what I'm going to do is I'm just going to have each of you announce whether or not this is your verdict.
Sir, are these your verdicts? Yes, that was my verdict.
>> Okay, thank you. If you want to just pass it down, I'll ask everyone the same question. Sir, is that your verdicts?
>> Yes, that's correct.
>> Okay.
>> Yes.
>> Yes, sir. That's correct.
>> Yes.
>> Yes.
>> Yes.
>> Yes.
>> Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
>> All right. Thank you very much.
Ladies and gentlemen, you have now completed your duties as jurors in this case and are discharged with the thanks of the court. The question may arise whether you may now discuss this case with the lawyers, the defendant or other persons involved in the case. For your guidance, the court instructs you that whether you talk to anyone is entirely your own decision. It is proper for others to discuss the case with you and you may talk with them but you need not.
If you talk to them and you uh if you talk to them you may tell them as much or as little as you like about your deliberations or the facts that influenced your decisions. If any person persists in discussing the case over your objection or becomes critical of your service either before or after any discussion has begun, please report it to me. Uh I'm going to ask that we go back to the jury room. I'm going to meet with you for a few a few moments. I'll also invite you back into the courtroom if you'd like to speak with the district attorney uh or any other members of our court staff about your experience. All right, with that, please rise and I'll meet you there in just a moment.
Thank you, sir.
>> Your honor, are you down with him?
>> I don't care.
>> Big ass law school.
>> I'm sorry.
>> I don't care. I got money. My family has money.
I'm not being a dick like that, bro.
But, bro, you're not.
>> Not yet. If you can, Unless you need to take him back. I can I can meet with him later.
>> He's all wired, bro. Unless you need to take him back.
>> Liars. Take me to jail. Y'all wired.
We're redoing this case. The new JUDGE, NOT YOUR [ __ ] [ __ ] ASS. THEY'LL [ __ ] YOUR WIFE, LITTLE DICK, BOY. [ __ ] YOUR WIFE. THAT'S [ __ ] >> YOU CAN TAKE it back.
>> Mute them.
>> I mean, I really wanted to hear the rest of it. I don't know why the judge cut him off.
>> Apparently, the defendant has not calmed down enough for me to speak with him at this moment. So, I'll be back um as soon as I can.
>> Okay. Thank you.
>> Yeah.
I mean, how how do I not play these?
It's it's it's too good.
>> Thank you. This is State of Kansas versus Rachel McBth. These are case numbers. MGI 22CR459 MGI 23CR 3000,0001 MGI 23 30 3002 MGI 24CR56 and MGI 25CR120 Miss McBTH appears in custody by Zoom with B separate from council Mr. Latin state by Mr. So these matters are set this morning on Mr. Latin's motion to withdraw as attorney for Miss McBth.
Procedurally, where these cases stand is there's been a conviction following jury trial in 22 CR459 and and an appeal has been filed. So that appeal process is underway.
Case number 24, CR56 is presently set for a 1-day jury trial to commence on June 11. And case number 25, CR120 is set for a 2-day jury trial to commence on June 8th. The 223 cases were previously set for 1-day jury trials, but those were previously continued at the request of the defense, and those remain u not reset at this time.
Uh Mr. Latin, you have the floor.
>> Okay. Yes. In regards to each one of those cases, the 22459, we filed the notice of appeal, I believe appeal at council being said to allow me to withdraw for that case. Uh anyway, on the other four cases that you've discussed, your honor, uh I guess you might say this, Miss McBth has basically threatened and alleged that she's going to file a disciplinary complaint against me arising out of the 22459 case. Your honor, um I'm going to go into all the details on it, but I believe it's basically put me in a position where I can't really provide effective aid to represent her in a fair manner. your honor. That really kind of puts us at a point where we do have a conflict of interest. She wants me to represent her there. You know, and you look at all I guess you think about, you know, your when you look at these conflict of interest. There's kind of look at the person's loyalties and basically caliber representation in the future for your honor.
when you start making threats to an attorney that basically what she says that that she hopes I enjoy what I've been doing to her because she's going to basically take my law license away from me. So that justly puts us at a conflict here on her. I think it's kind of put me in a position where I don't feel like I can stantially, you know, represent her.
Kind of dilutes my ability to represent her in these other four cases.
M >> that's fair enough, Mr. Latin. I think that's sufficient uh basis for you. Um Miss McBth, just simply I don't need you to go into the details as to your request for a new attorney. I just my question for you relates to the status of your cases that are still pending. Do you understand that if I do grant Mr. Latin request withdrawal as your attorney of record. Um that's going to result in your cases being continued. That's going to result in your cases that are presently set for trial being continued.
uh and all that time. I don't know that you currently have a statuto speed of trial right in light of you having a prison sentence and the 22CR459, but any constit constitutional speed of trial right or statuto speed of trial right you might have that's all going to be counted or assessed against you since this delay of your cases um is based on your actions and and your request for a new attorney. Do you understand that? I haven't requested a new attorney. I have a trial in a month. I'm not waving my speedy right. He's acting like a four-year-old. I haven't turned him in.
Like, I'm not going to. I want these trials done.
>> Are you saying that Mr. Latin is inaccurate in a statement to the court?
>> I'm saying that that's not a legitimate reason when I have two trials coming up in a month. If I turned him in, then yeah, that'd be a reason. But I haven't said anything. It was a conversation between me and my attorney. He's the one breaking privilege talking to you about it like >> All right, Mr. Gasso, what's your position on on the matter if you have one?
>> Your honor, we will leave it at the court's discretion. I know that Mr. Latin would be in a precarious situation um in continued representation based on Miss uh McBth's threats.
>> All right.
>> You know, you could have gone with no objection. that would have worked just fine.
>> Well, unfortunately, Miss McBth, it's that your conduct and actions have resulted um in your current situation. I am going to grant Mr. Atlant's motion to withdraw as your attorney of record. I don't believe he can effectively represent you in light of uh the difficulty you've caused his representation.
>> So, we are going to strike the current trial settings.
We'll know if this delay is a result of defense conduct and action. This will not count against the state for any speed trial analysis, either statutory or constitutional wise.
We're going to review these matters again on my June 4th docket at 9:00 by Zoom. Between now and then, I will discuss review the cases and see what attorney we can appoint that would not have a conflict um given the witnesses. Hey sir, if that's a legitimate reason for him to quit. Well, I plan on turning you and Michael Gio in two. So, y'all need to quit, too.
>> You're welcome to do that, ma'am. I'm I'm not going to recuse, but you can do what you feel is necessary.
>> We'll see.
>> I hadn't seen this one yet, but that's a nice touch. Oh, okay. Okay, then you know, you get a complaint as well.
Perfect. By the way, it's weird. Judge Gler's been around for a long time, but I I rarely get cases. So, it's I've probably done five or six, but over like a long period of time, he looks good. He looks like he's getting younger.
>> You on June 4th at 9:00. Thank you. And your honor, just just for the record, I think we already have a prior record of it, but um Jim Villa Maria, who was her prior counsel before Robert Latin was um appointed, also had issues regarding prior threats and that's why he withdrew as well.
>> All right. And I would note since this is by Zoom, uh for the record that Miss McBth did just leave the Zoom room there with the deputies. She was not released by the court. Um, but she did leave these proceedings on her own.
>> Well, to her credit, she threatened everybody first.
>> All right. Anything further on Miss Beth's cases, Mr. Latin?
>> No, your honor.
>> All right.
Have a good day. Thank you.
>> Your honor, may I be excused?
>> You may. Yes.
>> Thank you.
Oavian Hill 25M 4067 26 M1 179 >> That's fine.
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah. It's just >> All right, Miss Newman.
>> Uh, thank you, Judge. Mr. Hill does need to reapply for the public defenders office. He has started that application process. Um, and we've talked about it more. Um, so >> that was weird. I haven't seen this. Why is he touching her? That was creepy.
>> I'd ask for another court date um that I could finalize that.
All right, the two cases here.
I show the VPO and 26M1 179 also is DV.
Are they both DV? Let me just look.
Looks like they are. I have Miss Hill present. Does she wish to address the court or just here to watch?
>> It's Miss Davis. Stephanie Davis.
>> What did I say?
>> Hill.
>> Miss Hill.
>> Oh, Stephanie Davis. I even have it here. So, I don't know why I said Hill.
>> She'd like to address sport.
>> Indeed, he is.
All right. Um, let's do this.
>> You just want me to speak from here?
>> Yes.
>> Okay. Um, I just wanted to say that Quay never hit me.
>> You want what though?
>> Quay never hit me. So I don't know understand why we're going through these.
>> Mr. Hill, look here. He is nodding at her. He is sort of communicating to her.
That's not true. I saw you.
>> Hold on a second.
So when I asked if she wanted to address, he made eye contact and he did this. I don't like that one bit. So I'm not stupid and I do watch.
>> I'm sorry, your honor. So, >> I don't want you to answer, >> but um I know what I see and I am watching and you're not in compliance with bond conditions and so you need to talk to your attorney and listen to what she's saying. You're not the victim here. You're not being victimized.
>> I wouldn't Okay, go ahead.
>> Thank you.
I'm sorry, your honor, for speaking out out of turn. And I do accept your reasoning for me to say something, your honor. Right now, in this moment, your honor, I've been through this court process for this one case, your honor.
Multiple times. I've been arrested throughout this court case multiple times, your honor. I do not have any full horse or correspondence with Miss Davis coming in today to have something to say to you, your honor. It is simply my life being put on the line, your honor. While anyone would want to speak for me, I'm not making anyone say anything, your honor. For whatever reason right now, your honor, I am predominantly presumed innocent. I do not have any >> evidence against me presented from the DA that I did anything on this case, your honor. The only thing that I have to say, >> I don't know what he's charged with, but just lock him up.
>> Say right now is that I'm not disrespecting your courtroom. I'm not overstepping in your courtroom, Mr. Briggs, your honor. All I'm saying, your honor, is that I've been innocent throughout this whole case, this whole time, your honor. And the DA has never said to my public defender or to you, your honor, what is keeping me in custody or keeping me coming back here.
I haven't had a preliminary hearing. I haven't had anything to do with this case other than showing up and making sure that I have a public defender standing next to me every time. In this case, it doesn't seem like I need to keep a public defender cuz there is no evidence against me that I did anything to Miss Davis. Is that why you're not reapplying then?
>> No, sir. I've just put in as many applications to the public defender's office as I did as I can. My my PDL is for some reason locked in my settings that I don't know how to unlock it. So, I send the PDF over to the public defender's office every week and they call me back saying that, can you just send me a screenshot of the PDF? And I've done that multiple times. I'm sure she can go into her files and she can kind of back that stuff up, your honor, that I've just been sending PDF after PDF file.
So, I guess I'm a little confused. This case, the the newest case is only from January and I don't I show you maybe here March 26. You were in person and I would have told you to go right over there in person because if you do it by uh email and you didn't listen to me, right, you probably were like, "Well, I'll just email. Easy enough." It isn't. It's a lot harder. And I've gone in and you can get it done, but I don't have 100%. You know what I have 100% is if you go over and you hand it to them. Yes, sir.
>> Okay. Then you don't have a public defender on this case because I can't get you to go over in person and apply in person. Yes, sir.
>> And then I have 25M 4067.
Now that looks like that case was from December.
And so you say every time I keep coming here and you're dragging it out, judge, I only see that you've been out of custody one time on that case. So at least in the ultimate scheme of things, this is not a case that's being dragged out. I just need a public defender.
>> Yes, sir. Your honor, >> and to comply with probation. And now there's a new case in Grand County or Gilpin County, rather. And so there's a warrant for your arrest on those. Yes, sir. And I I understand that it's a hassle, but the bottom line is I have to have you comply with my orders. And I do want to answer your concern, which is they haven't shown me the evidence because people hear all the time, I get my day in court.
>> That happens at trial. So, they don't have any burden other than to have a judge find probable cause for arrest.
And then you get a lawyer and everything slows down. Um, I have had and seen cases get dismissed over the years because they don't have enough evidence to go forward. Whether these three cases fall in that category or not, I don't know. But my experience is that attorneys have better luck getting them dismissed than someone on their own. They could have dismissed it long before now. If they think there is some evidence against you, then they have to go forward. Hold on, let me finish. But that's what Miss Davis has been doing for me, your honor, is that she's been contacting the DA and letting them know that.
>> No.
>> So, I'm not going to modify the protection order.
>> I'm just creeped out here. I don't know what's going on, but the whole thing creeps me out >> today. I may consider it later. Too many cases, too much going on. And I'm just looking at the affidavit. Um, and on one case, there's at least an allegation that you grabbed her by the face. She had blood on her face. The police said the situation bore that out.
And so they have that charge. and then at the very least they found you in contact with her um and that violates the protection order here. So I I understand I'm happy to set these cases for trial. Obviously um I don't want to do that until he has the opportunity to get the public defender out of custody.
Um but um I do have concerns um that you know and the people can look into it and I'm not here to say violated or didn't violate but we're sitting together having contact um and we're certainly communicating and right now um actually it says face to face in public in the one case so that may be allowed. Let me look on the other one.
And then looks like I've modified it substantially, Miss Davis. I'm not going to modify it again. Um, I understand you're saying nothing happened. That isn't what they found out the day of the arrest. And Miss Newman has access to the police reports. She can tell you what the allegations are. Um, go ahead.
>> I don't have access at this point, Judge.
>> No access >> because I'm not entered on the cases, so I don't have discovery.
>> Okay. So, you need to apply, but he's if he's in custody, >> um, did you want to >> Well, I he's going to be remanded. He'll be in bond hearings. Please let um them know so that you can reach a stipulation for >> I will and I will he be set for this afternoon's bond tomorrow. Okay. I do want to just let the court know that um while I'm here as a courtesy I'm not entered on the cases so I could not advise Mr. Hill on the motions to increase. Um I was able to see that there were warrants. I did advise him of that and he did choose to stay and turn himself in on those and so I just wanted that to be on the record as well. make sure that the public defender readresses that in front of whoever the judge is tomorrow. It's pretty dearo, I think.
>> So, I think that's fair. I do appreciate you staying here and taking the medicine, but um slow things down.
You're right. There isn't proof beyond a reasonable doubt, but there is probable cause. So, um defendant will be remanded on bond hearings tomorrow and then um do we give court dates or they just give them tomorrow? Yeah.
>> Okay, that'll be it for today. Thank you.
All right.
First of all, I find based on the petition and uh the uh testimony in court including admissions made by uh the respondent uh that the court has jurisdiction over the petitioner, the respondent and the minor children. venue is proper here because children reside here. The uh petitioner resides here and at the time of uh the uh behavior alleged the respondent resided here. Uh I find that the respondent has abused the petitioner and the minor children identified in this order um within the meeting of the domestic violence act. Uh the actions of respondent will likely cause irreparable harm uh if continued or continued abuse unless they are prohibited. It is therefore necessary to grant the request of relief in this order to protect petitioner or other refused persons who ask what's going on. I've indicated I've entered an order protection that is set and let me finish talking before you totally freak out. Okay. Um, I have set this uh to expire uh on May 4th, 2028 at 11:59 p.m. In the meantime, it prohibits any contact with Harmony Morgan or your children. Um, and that includes indirect contact, uh, contact to a third person. So, no social media, no asking.
>> He He really doesn't play. He He's got some edge for an older guy, >> somebody to talk to them for you, no calling her parents to try to get them to get a message in. Just zero contact.
Um, I'm going to expect because I've explained the terms of this order to you that you stop downstairs at the clerk's office on your way out and get a copy.
It'll be scanned in. All right.
>> Okay.
>> Um, now the reason I'm telling you not to freak out is she has filed a uh DC case. That means a divorce with children. Okay.
petition for dissolution with children.
Same judge. I'm going to have that essentially consolidated with the um family law case when the family law case is put in front of me on May 20th or 26th. What whatever it was.
Um it's got to be May 20th. I'm not going to be here on the 26th.
Um So um you can I can modify that order if we decide that that's appropriate in the fam.
Okay. So it's not necessarily forever but you ask can I be oh can I be heard?
Absolutely. And and and she's got a lawyer. I mean >> this is weird. They're consolidating consolidating a divorce case with a criminal matter.
That that procedurally is very strange.
I'm going to suggest that you get a lawyer if you can possibly do it. Um because this is going to be very very stressful for both of you. All right. Um but that's it for today. I want you to stop downstairs and get a copy of this order on your way out. I want you to do the same. All right.
I will tell you that violation of that order, if she calls the police on the first offense, if they take you into custody, is a class A misdemeanor.
Second offense is a fel. All right.
Um, I would like you to take off right now.
Get your copy of the order and leave because as soon as she leaves the building, my baiff over there, Doug, will let you go. Um, and you get your copy of the order and take off. But in the meantime, you should just have a seat in the back. Okay.
>> Good luck to both. And I thank you.
>> Yeah. Here's a copy of the can. Yeah, I could talk at this. Hold on. Hold on.
I'll take you for li. Thank you for lying, >> sir.
Sir.
>> Yes, sir.
>> Listen to me. What you just did accusing a judge of lying to you is contempt of court.
>> Well, does it record in here?
>> Everything's recording.
>> Okay, that's perfect because if you keep talking, I am going to find you in contempt of court. I'm going to remand you in the custody of the women of the Boone County Sheriff. Do you understand what I'm saying to you? You need to stop calling me a liar and you need to stop >> accusing me of doing something nefarious.
You admitted this behavior.
>> And so, Sir Austin, sir.
>> I'm done with you. You just have a seat in the back.
>> I know. I believe >> and calm down.
>> But the case is over.
>> Listen, Billy.
>> Sir, just give it a minute. Have a seat in the back and calm down.
>> Permission to cons.
>> Yes.
>> What about the DC?
>> It's No. No. It hasn't.
I don't have a notice. I don't other than I like him. He's fun. He's fun. I hadn't seen that before. Although dropping a nefarious on this guy, there's no way he understood that.
All right, that's what I have. I just got I got extra good nuggets. That was fun. Good day of streaming. Thank you all for coming out. I appreciate it. Oh, I I think I also have to blame MGT for this one in addition to Zach. Behave yourselves. I will see you all soon.
Ähnliche Videos
BREAKING: Judge Kathleen Issues Emergency Arrest Warrant After Trump Defies Order
Frontora
2K views•2026-05-29
8 Hidden Things About Mackenzie Shirilla Netflix's 'The Crash' Didn't Show You
MarvelousVideos
2K views•2026-05-28
MP Garnett Genuis warns Canada’s MAiD system has ‘gone too far’
WesternStandard
187 views•2026-05-28
Trump Impeachment STORM IGNITES as 29 Judges Vote for Conviction!!
DanielBriefDaily
2K views•2026-06-02
सुप्रीम कोर्ट में 5 जजों का शपथग्रहण समारोह #supremecourt #judges #oathceremony #shorts #ytshorts
Bharat24Liv
4K views•2026-06-02
THE STREISAND EFFECT AT BARBARA STREISAND’S HOUSE! - First Amendment Audit
KULTNEWS
1K views•2026-05-30
EBK Jaaybo Won’t Be Going To Trial?! | Criminal Lawyer Reacts
floridadefenseteam
404 views•2026-05-29
OFFICE HOURS: The Theft of Black Brilliance... AI and Intellectual Property (w/ Lisa E. Davis)
marclamonthillnetwork
2K views•2026-05-29











