When the Art is Bigger Than the Artist

Añadido: 2026-05-19

[00:00:00]This video is brought to you by Movie.

[00:00:01]Get a whole month free at movieby.com/loi cinema.

[00:00:05]>> Believe it or not, Eraserhead is my most spiritual film.

[00:00:09]>> Mhm. Now, why elaborate on that?

[00:00:11]>> No, I won't. Um, you you have everything in the film. That's the thing. It doesn't matter what I say. Zip.

[00:00:20]>> Whenever I'm about to watch a movie, I do something automatically. I check who made it. Is it a name I know? A new voice? An A24 film? Before the movie even starts, meaning has already begun forming in my mind. And it made me wonder, have we forgotten how to experience art on its own? Or maybe did we ever?

[00:00:47]I thought about the Odyssey, one of the oldest and most influential stories ever told. And the thing is, we don't really know who created it. Was Homer a real person? Was it one author? Several people? Nobody knows for sure. And for centuries, it was a spoken tale passed down through generations before it was ever written down. And yet, thousands of years later, the Odyssey is still alive.

[00:01:12]People keep reading it, interpreting it, adapting it, and finding new meaning in it. It no longer belongs to whoever first told it. It belongs to everyone.

[00:01:21]And interestingly, this discourse isn't new. For a long time, critics have been wrestling with a strange idea. What if art doesn't really belong to the artist once it is created? Roland Barts, in his essay, The Death of the Author, argued that once a work of art is made, the author no longer fully controls what it means. In his own words, the birth of the reader must be at the cost of the death of the author. Or in other words, the meaning of a work of art is much greater than the one intended by a singular author. And so we should stop asking what did the author mean and start asking what does the work mean?

[00:01:59]Meaning is created between the work and the people experiencing it.

[00:02:03]>> It doesn't really matter what I think.

[00:02:05]It's the viewer and the picture and sound and it makes a circle and it just goes like that. And um actually there is something freeing in that. As a creator, it means you don't have to perfectly explain everything. You don't have to force meaning into your work. You just have to make something honest and alive.

[00:02:25]Then people will find meaning in it.

[00:02:27]Sometimes meaning you didn't even know was there.

[00:02:29]>> I think it's great for people to read whatever the whatever you guys choose to read into what the show means. Uh, I feel like I on Breaking Bad I I spent too much time saying to people, I think it means this and I think what Walt was really saying was that I I I I don't want to do that on this one.

[00:02:47]>> And there is also another good argument in favor of this idea that the work is greater than the author. Sometimes artists make something that feels wiser than they are.

[00:03:01]>> That was Mozart.

[00:03:05]that that giggling, dirty-minded creature I'd just seen crawling on the floor.

[00:03:18]When I met Paul, I was like, "This this is the guy." Just cuz he was just like, "Hey, what's up?" unassuming and he's a little bit uh inhibited or goofy a little. I would never in a trillion years guess that he made these movies.

[00:03:31]It's nuts.

[00:03:33]And we also know plenty of morally messy, contradictory people who somehow created beautiful, truthful art. How does that happen? How can a person be confused and make something clear? How can a selfish person make something generous? How can a person be lost and create something that helps others find themselves?

[00:03:55]That's strange. And it made me think maybe artists are not really creating their work in the way we imagine. Maybe art is something we discover. It is after all a long-standing debate. Is art created or discovered? And if it is discovered then Roland Bart is correct.

[00:04:15]Your art doesn't belong to you. Its meaning goes beyond its author.

[00:04:21]But if that's true, then why do we care so much about authors? Why does it matter that something is by Christopher Nolan or Stanley Kubri or Charlie Kaufman? Why does their name change how we watch the movie? Because it does. If I say Nolan's Odyssey, you instantly imagine one kind of movie. If I say Tarantino's Odyssey, you imagine something completely different. That's before a single frame exists. So clearly, the author still matters. This is what Michelle Fuko noticed. He said, "Maybe the author didn't disappear.

[00:04:55]Maybe the author turned from an individual into a lens. The author is not simply a person but a principle by which we organize meaning. A name becomes a frame through which we experience the work. People absolutely care who made the movie and it fundamentally shapes interpretation.

[00:05:12]That's how we think. Kubric film, Lynch film, Kaufman film, Yorgos Lanthamos film. The name shapes our expectations.

[00:05:21]And in today's world, this is even stronger.

[00:05:24]>> One, please.

[00:05:25]>> Now, artists are brands. People don't just watch a movie, they watch a Nolan film. That name carries meaning on its own. And Christopher Nolan's adaptation of The Odyssey is the perfect example.

[00:05:37]On one side, you have The Odyssey, a story that no longer belongs to any one author. On the other side, you have Christopher Nolan, one of the strongest author names in modern cinema. That's interesting because people will go to theaters because Nolan made it. But once the movie comes out, something else will happen. People will interpret it in ways Nolan never intended. People will debate what it means. They will connected to politics, psychology, modern life, masculinity, technology, everything. And at that point, the movie starts becoming bigger than Nolan, just like the Odyssey became bigger than whoever first told it.

[00:06:18]So, who does art belong to? The person who made it, the audience, culture, time, maybe all of them.

[00:06:26]>> I'd love to hear your thoughts on this in the comments.

[00:06:31]>> This video was brought to you by Movie.

[00:06:33]Movie is a global streaming service dedicated to elevating great cinema where every film is chosen by a curator rather than an algorithm. Movie is a place to discover ambitious films from iconic directors such as Parkchan Wuk and Vim vendors to emerging aur. It's a place to find films that are harder to find elsewhere and a great way to expand your taste in cinema. Movie doesn't push recommendations based on your data like most streaming platforms. Instead, the focus is on thoughtful programming by their team. That's one of my favorite things about Movie. It feels more like discovering films through someone whose taste I've grown to trust. You can try Movie free for 30 days at movieby.com/loi cinema. That's mubi.com/locinema for a whole month of great cinema for