Throughout Islamic history, when political centers collapsed (such as the Abbasid Caliphate), Muslims did not wait for political restoration but instead built institutions to regenerate their communities. This regenerative thinking, exemplified by scholars like Imam Juḥany in the 11th century, demonstrates that Muslims can rebuild from the ground up through scholarship, institutions, and community engagement. The Sharia provides a moral and communal horizon that guides Muslims to continue as a community during crises, emphasizing that institutional building is more effective than seeking political restoration. Colonialism added complexity by disconnecting Muslims from their history and co-opting legal institutions, but the core principle remains: Muslims must focus on building durable institutions that serve as spaces of identity formation, meaning-making, and community regeneration.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
After the Caliphate: What Muslim History Teaches About Renewal | Dr. Sohaira Siddiqui
Added:Can the Sharia come to an end? Of course, 50 years later, you have the Ottoman Empire as well. Muslims do not wait for [music] political restoration, but rather they build institutions.
Colonialism was a deeper [music] form of tragedy for the Muslim woman. Dr. Sahra Sadiki is an associate professor of Islamic studies at Georgetown University in Qatar, [music] an executive director of the Al- Madilla Center and Mosque for women in Doha. She's a leading scholar of classical Islamic [music] law and political fault. Now when the abbased caliphate collapse [music] famously at this point really start taking off which is the hospital system and I think the mosque is the old institution that we have to revive. Gaza has become a a a catalyst for we are here in this amazing space of al-madilla here in DHA with its executive director Dr. Sahara Sadiki asalam allayikum and welcome to the thinking muslim.
It's lovely to have you with us Dr. Sahara. Now today we're going to be talking about a number of themes in particular decline and how Muslims in the past and present navigate decline. And um I had a discussion with you prior to to this show and we had a really uh interesting conversation about how Muslims during those periods where we had we could we could argue these are bleak times or bleak periods uh Muslims found uh a great resource within themselves to to recover from uh from from their dire situations. And that's really what we're going to focus on today. Now I want to start with uh an imam, a scholar of Islamic history who I know you speak a lot about and you uh you've included in your research, I imam Joani. I imam Joani wrote in 11th century about the possibility of the collapse of the Abbasid caliphate. Uh and now he wrote at a time when that prospect did not seem particularly real. Um can you just tell us about why I imam Joani decided to uh to entertain this for experiment? What was he trying to achieve and what did he conclude about Muslims if the political center of the ummah fell? Yeah, it's a it's a large question but a good question to start with because I think this this idea of crisis and decline um has been on all of our minds for a very long time at this point. And one of the reasons I got so interested in Juwani is as a graduate student I've just found it utterly fascinating that a scholar in the 11th century is thinking about these questions. And what made it more remarkable is that oftent times when we think about the Abbassad period we of course describe it as the golden age of Islam.
Right? Starting in the 8th century going up to the 13th 14th century we see this as the height of creativity and intellectualism and political strength. So why in the middle of that is this scholar writing about this question of decline? Um one of the things that I think is really important and kind of Joani specific political moment is he's born in 1028 in Nishapur. Um shortly after that um you know the Seljuks take over and Nishapur and the Seljuks are known to be a very very strong dynastic power. But what the takeover of the Seljuks reveal is that very early in Albased history power wasn't held centrally. Right. So you have the Abbasad Kiff and of course Baghdad. Um but you have the Aabids that are taking over in 800. You have the Salmonids. Um you have the Bouyads, you have the Seljuks. You have all of these different dynastic families um and dynastic powers that are taking control in what we would maybe call the provinces or the periphery.
And so you have this very delicate balance or this bifurcation of power between a legitimate Khalifa who's who's the Abbassid Khalifa but then also these legitimate families that are ruling and I think for Janei while he accepts this bifurcation um and in many ways he benefits from this bifurcation he's patroned by the Seljuks he starts to think about what happens when we start making too many concessions and so his main political treaties which is called um savior of the nations um in it's famously dedicated to nisam who was of course a seljuk at the time and he starts thinking about okay if you don't have the ideal qualifications of the khalifa the first one-third of the book is these this is the ideal and this is who we want the second third of the book is then devoted to what happens if we find an individual who doesn't meet these qualifications and then that ushers in a period of what he calls kind of non ideal political rule and he sees his own moment as that moment because despite the fact that the Seljuks have power and are creating a great amount of stability in their institution building in their patroning different you know um massagid and different uh institutions he still sees that situation as not ideal because the abbased kaleiff at this time is weak and so what ends up happening is in the last third of his book he then starts thinking about um this idea of no kiff altogether and that's where it gets very interesting what happens to community and society when there [clears throat] is no khalifa and so in many ways you know we might see his political treaties as something very very unique and it is but in other ways I find it to be um almost a reflection of his own kind of um approach to to power which is power can be bifurcated but that bifurcation of power um can eventually lead to potentially problematic outcomes. Right. Okay. And so what did he conclude in in the latter part of his book where he concludes that there's a possibility that you could have a situation where the um has no kaleiff at all. What sort of conclusions does he does he come to and what does he say but um should do at such a time. So this is where the book gets really interesting. So in the last third he says okay suppose that you don't find anybody that is minimally competent. So um you have all of these qualifications. They should be aesh. They should be ahead. They should be, you know, all of these different um qualifications. And he says, "Okay, let's say we don't have anybody. We should at least get somebody that's minimally competent that knows how to create stability." And if we don't have that, then he says there's no Khalifa.
What ends up happening is you have the rise of communities around local power, which he says will center on the mutahs. M so he transfers power to the so it's the and the specifically that he says will take over power then he says what if these mjahids pass away right because they also have this idea that the mjids of course can can go away and you don't have these legal scholars then he says it will go to just the regular scholars the right the person who can or the mut is the person who can still give a fatwa and then he says what if these individuals go away and he says then it will go to the people who have the Quran memorized and the hadith memorized. And then he says, "What if these people go away?" And then he says, "Well, you still have the Quran and hadith." And then he says, "What if people stop memorizing the Quran?" And they stop memorizing hadith.
What happens then? And he has, you know, at the end of the book, basically where he leaves off is you have the loss of the caliphate and then you also have the loss of the Sharia. So he comes to this point where he says once the last individual stops practicing the sharia they stop knowing how to pray and they stop knowing how to fast then you also have the loss of the sharia. But what maintains some sense of community in between then are these individuals recognized by the community as um as being legal scholars as being as being religious scholars and they kind of give the community some sense of stability in between. Now, before we move forward with the episode, I need to speak to you directly for a moment. Over the past while, a lot of you have been telling me the same thing. You're subscribed. You've got the notifications on, but our weekly program just isn't showing up in your feed. You're not imagining it. We've seen the numbers on our end, too. Here's the reality. Because of the subjects we cover, the issues that matter to us, the issues that matter to you, we believe we've been shadowbanned. The platform isn't banning us outright. It's just quietly making sure fewer of you see what we put out. No explanation, no notification, just less reach. We're not going to give up what we cover. That's not up for negotiation, but it does mean we need your help to make this content actually reach the people. So, here's what I'm asking you to do, and it would take you 2 minutes to do this. Number one, if you haven't already, hit subscribe. And just as importantly, tap the bell icon. Notifications are the one thing the algorithm cannot fully bury. Number two, join our WhatsApp group and Telegram channels. Links are in the show notes below. This way, when a new episode drops, you hear it from us directly, not from an algorithm deciding whether you deserve to know what comes out. Number three, sign up to my Substack newsletter. Same reason. There is a list we own, not one a platform can quietly throttle. And lastly, and maybe most importantly, if something you we put out resonates with you, forward it. Send it to a group chat, send it to a friend, send it to your family. We're going to start putting out readymade WhatsApp messages. You can just copy and forward.
Uh we'll make it as easy as possible for you. So, none of this is about vanity metrics. It's about making sure that when a platform decides these conversations are less convenient for them, that decision doesn't get to be the final word. Remember, we come out with a regular episode every Friday at 6:00 p.m. UK time. Make sure you're the ones who actually see it. Was I imi an outlier at his time? Like were there other scholars working on similar thought experiments? I suppose uh looking at you know what happens when the Muslim Ummah reaches a bleak period as as Joani seems to be describing you know I've I've contended with this question of like you know is he an outlier is he not an outlier and in some ways I would say the that specific text is an outlier that you don't really have scholars in the 11th century um writing about kind of the loss of the Khalifa um on the other hand he isn't an outlier because you have a big theological debate um that starts in the 9th century and continues on in Joani situated in that debate about the loss of the Sharia. Can the Sharia come to an end? And so Joani ties it to this political question which I think is unique and then talks about the loss of the Khalifa. Um but very early on I remember um you know this concept uh facad zaman which is kind of the decline of the times the moral degradation the communal degradation and we see this being used as early as the time of of so um there was this interesting kind of legal principle or legal ruling around stray camels during the time of the prophet sallallahu alaihi wasallam so the prophet sallallahu alaihi wasallam used to say if there's a stray camel let it And eventually an owner will come and claim it even though camels are very expensive but it's like leaving unguarded wealth but he's saying you know leave the wealth unguarded leave the camels unguarded the rightful owner will claim it and by the time of man he says we need to change this legal ruling because of facadan the times have declined and now if you just leave this unguarded wealth then somebody will take it and so in that sense you know jwani also follows a tradition of individuals that are saying things are getting worse after the passing of the prophet sallallahu alaihi wasallam. Um political power is weakening and uh what he does is tried to think about well what do we do in that absence? Um I know we we we are here to talk about uh your the view you have about regeneration regenerative sort of times when when we have these sort of when we have these uh periods of crisis but I want to come back to Imam Dwani for a second because of course you know he's he's living in an era where you've got the Seljuks and you've got this bifificcation of power as you said between the Abbasids who are the rightful center of the Muslim um the leaders of the Muslim um and then you've about these families uh that are buying for position. Um did Imam Joani uh in his in his tract in his writings did he talk about how potentially you know one can reform uh the the caliphate as it stands such that you know you're you're dealing with uh lessening this bifocation you're you're bringing power back to the center like was the status quo for him an acceptable status quo or did he see that to be problematic from a Sharia perspective you know he did not see it as problematic from a Sharia perspective So I think what's very unique about Islamic political thought is that it didn't ever posit kind of a single model of how power can be held. Um and often times when we think about power in in the modern day we think about it as centrally held and even during the time of the prophet sallallahu alaihi wasallam it was centrally held. Um but I would say the reason it was so easy for it to be centrally held during the time of the prophet sallallahu alaihi wasallam is twofold. one, he was the prophet and and and so it made it very easy for everybody to to see him as of course the legitimate ruler of the Muslim community. Yeah. But also because it was a city model, he was the ruler of Medina and initially and then as the empire you the Muslim empire started to expand, you already see in the prophet sallallahu alaihi wasallam and as an example that he's starting to give power to the companions who he's sending out. So in the ca famous case of Madb who goes to Yemen he says toad how will you rule and says I'll rule on the basis of the Quran and the sunnah and he says and if you don't find the answer in that and then he said I'll rule based on the basis of my opinion and I think what's interesting in the case of Morad is that he's saying both he's using the word rule right he's not saying you know how you administer things saying how will you rule and then he's saying to Morad that yes you can rule on the basis of your judgment And then he famously becomes of course a governor and a judge and all of these different things.
So I think in the model of even how the prophet sallallahu alaihi wasallam sent his companions out. He empowered them with a certain degree of power when they went to these various areas. They weren't necessarily writing back every single day and saying I need an answer on this. Should I set up this? Should I do this? And I think that model then trickles down into Muslim civilization and and these various khalifas that come. And then there's also the practical challenge of if if you look at the Abbassad Empire ranging from Morocco all the way to Central Asia and the middle of that is Baghdad. How do you meaningfully rule this area before you have massive interconnectivity and you know you're sending a letter and it takes weeks and sometimes months to arrive at a location.
So in some sense the the the model of the prophet sallallahu alaihi wasallam's rule and the the sheer challenge of governing such wide vast land under the Islamic empire forced um I think kaiffs to contend with the fact that you simply have to give rule to other individuals um and these dynastic families to the extent that they recognize you as legitimate um and there is some I would say agreement in terms of uh you know ruling principles and institutions then I think it was a it was a it was a practical um balance of power and so it's a very different conception to what we think of today of power but it worked for most of Islamic history right now you've written about the regenerative thinking that emerged during these periods of collapse um uh just walk us through uh the the sort of type of regenerative thinking that's required and that uh in history uh how did Muslims uh view these bleak periods of crisis that they faced? Yeah. Um you know if [clears throat] we if we put ourselves in kind of the the end of the Abbasid Empire, you have of course the the the Sak of Baghdad by the Mongols. This is you know famously you know they describe you even like the rivers and how they were bloodied and burned with with books of the libraries. This is some two centuries after Joani right? Yeah. This is 1250. Yeah. And Joani dies in 1085. So we're we're talking about like 150 years basically after um and the the bifurcated notion of power actually functioned I would say in a in a very maybe positive is too strong a word but it it really allowed for there to be crisis in one point where regeneration is happening in another point. So a great example would be the Mlukan right by 1260. So just 10 years after the Abbasids have lost Baghdad and they've lost the empire, the Mamluks beat the Mongols in the battle in Jalut in 1260 and you have at that point after that a real focus of the Mamluke Empire on administrative building.
So they see what's happening, they've seen what's happened and they understand that maybe what we we we haven't been able to stop the Mongols and the onslaught that happened there. The Mongols are now ruling there. But what we can do now in the territories that are under our control is create institutions and create systems. So court systems are created, postal systems are created, um uh the bimistons famously at this point really start taking off which is the hospital system. Um and you see the same thing happening in the Delhi Sultanate. So the Delhi Sultanate is founded in 1206 slightly before the the fall of the Abbassids. But similarly when the Abbassids fall then there's a sense that now the Deli Sultanate has to really take on more administrative regeneration. So they established the full Lewan system they establish um even uh they introduced copper coins at this point. It didn't work successfully but they introduced copper and silver coins at this point. Um they introduced a system of taxation um the water irrigation system. And so in many ways what happens is a crisis in one point in one location in the Muslim community actually results in regeneration in other places because there's a recognition that there is a weak spot that's now emerged but in order for us to actually address this we might not be able to go there and do regeneration there. But what we have to do is we have to take more ownership of the areas that we have. Um and of course 50 years later you have the Ottoman Empire as well. So, Muslim communities I would say historically and when we when we read kind of the rise and the falls of these families and these dynasties and these khalifas is that they rebounded very very quickly. The Nasar dynasty in Granada is another great example which is again happening um 1238 I believe which is just again 15 years before the Abbassid but then continuing after. So for many they could have kind of seen the death blow of uh the Abbasid Empire and what's happening in Baghdad as a moment in which well things are done but actually the all of the other areas enter into a period of great um great growth [snorts] and and so what lessons are we learning from that period of of weakness in in Islamic history? I mean in a sense we can we can try to draw an analogy with our situation today. I mean the Ottoman caliphate let's say but political core collapsed in the 1920s in the early 20th century. I mean have you do you feel that the Muslim ummah is likewise thinking in in this sort of regenerative way uh as they did back in in the 13th century. I mean in some parts I think yes there is there there are attempts at regeneration happening today as well. Um, and I think the the most important kind of lesson from history is you don't want to wallow in that in that despair and in that in the decline or in the destruction for too long because if you do then um then you're not going to be able to enter into that kind of process of building and growth and regeneration.
Um, and sometimes the you know the you famously we see of course and we can talk about the colonial period is like that period of decline I think was particularly challenging and kind of um what it did to Muslim society. So you don't have the same type of regeneration I think you had for example after the fall of the Abbasses that you do after the the the removal of colonial powers. And it's an interesting comparison but what I see in at least in history is that these moments in which loss happens very quickly after communities, institutions, political powers reather and try to think well how do we move forward? I mean so historically who would step in to to rebuild to build these institutions? Would it be I don't know scholars or would would scholars lead the the the journey? Would it be military people? Would it be I don't know merchants? Like who would step in to to fill the vacuum left by the political cause collapse? I mean really all of the above. So, you know, again, the way to think about power in Islamic civilization, especially when you're talking about politics and society, is because there was an acceptance that power isn't always going to be held at the core, that it's necessarily going to kind of proliferate and permeate into other spaces. You had then these dynastic families. You had then also very powerful families within cities themselves um that would famously patron universities, madrasas, hospitals, postal systems. Um and then you had in these institutions right and these institutions against can range from anything from a madrasa to a well um you know or a karavanari right that's been that's been set up uh to help travelers and then you have individuals and you know when we're looking at what all of these these these people are doing I think it actually stems from like a theological and legal framework which really puts the community at the center of these societies, not necessarily the individual. Right? So even when it comes to our legal rulings, right, you have ideas of what are our communal obligations. You have ideas of right the the the the giving that kind of last beyond you which is often connected to institutions. Um you you have the idea of the um you have the idea of you know and zakat and all of these things. So I think the framework um that Muslims were inhabiting was one of how do we build community at very different levels. So that could be at the individual level, it could be then at the level of the institution, it could be the rich families who are patrons, um it could be at the level of these dynastic families and then it's at the level of course the political core. Um but I think having that framework and having that commitment to the community and to regeneration and to growth um and the institutional building is probably what sustained Muslim societies throughout history.
Every time [music] we encounter people who are going through difficulty in their life, the real question is not how can we help them today. The real question is how can we break the cycle [music] of dependence? I'm happy to show you one of the programs that we are sponsoring here in Betton Mal. It's a women empowerment program. A vocational training program. So when [music] did this program start? Last month, two weeks ago. Two weeks ago. Yes. All of the women live around this area. So it's difficult to find like a suitable place to [music] to close their home.
So, so I understand this is a month-long program. It stays for for a whole month. So, we're halfway now. Yeah. In the program inshallah [music] after two weeks. So, then they And when this is over, you start another group and another group. Mashallah. This is beautiful. [music] [snorts] [music] There are about [music] 16 women here. Half come in the morning, half in the evening. It's a month-long program for sewing [music] so that they become more independent, more self-dependent. And this is the kind of thing that brings the community together and [music] strengthens the community.
[music] Please visit btml. us/thinkingmuslim to donate. Now, that's interesting because there's a pattern um you've identified that Muslims do not wait for political restoration, but rather they build institutions. And uh it's a Sharia, you know, from your last answer, it's a Sharia that propels them to to think about uh regenerating their communities and their ummah. What is it in the Sharia that that pushes Muslims to do that? because you know one would one one would think that um when the political center declines or political center collapses uh then you know you're without a leader and you just don't have that ability to steer your community through the choppy waters that that are to come. So what what is it that the Sharia does that pushes ordinary Muslims and institution and and and organizations within the community to build institutions?
I mean I think we have to you know we almost have to analyze a little bit what is the Sharia and the purpose of the Sharia and Sharia is not you know the correct translation of Sharia is not Islamic law um and it's not simply a body of rules that the individual is just uh enacting in terms of their daily rituals but I think what the Sharia is fundamentally trying to do is it's trying to set a moral and a communal horizon for believing Muslims Right? And what I mean by a moral and communal horizon is the moral horizon of the individual. How do I as an individual want to develop in terms of my relationship with with Allah? And a communal horizon in terms of how are we creating communities? And um and what do those communities actually look like? Yeah. And even in the the the the kind of literal meaning of the Sharia, it's a it's a pathway to a well, right? It's this idea that I am on some type of journey. And so for Muslim societies, you know, it's like that it's like that moment in which the prophet sallallahu alaihi wasallam passes away and the community doesn't know what to do and the companions are kind of fractured is you know are we continuing as a community or we not continuing as a community and in that moment they chose to continue as a community [snorts] and there is no kind of greater historical tragedy for a believing Muslim than of course the prophet the passing of the prophet sallallahu alaihi wasallam and so I think in every single moment then of crisis afterwards. The same choice is there. Do we stop as a community or do we continue? Yeah. And the Sharia is that system which tells us you have to continue and this is how you continue. And that's why I think it was very natural for the to say well we take over power right um because for them they see what they're fundamentally doing with the is not these individual rulings when someone comes to a muti and says you know can I is my prayer valid or can I eat this or can I not eat that those are just the but the moral universe it's trying to create the social universe it's trying to create this is why the jurists were always talking about right things that are in the public [clears throat] interest is far kafaya what are communal obligations. So the world that they inhabited was one that was thinking about the communal and so in these moments of fracture and crisis um and decline the I think the Sharia end up emerging as a new horizon um that can set the direction of travel. Now when the abbased caliphate collapsed that was very much a military collapse. there was a collapse at the core and and of course the different regions within the Muslim um regenerated and and as you said the Mluks and others uh took it upon themselves to build institutions but of course colonialism did something a little different I I would suggest um and I think you're right about this col colonialism was far deeper was far more devastating than military collapse uh the British for example sought to uh undo the alkavis system across the Muslim world or the French did the same in you know in North Africa. Um uh there was a cultural onslaught in very commerce you know against the Muslim um um in in many ways um colonialism was a deeper form of of tragedy for the Muslim um than maybe previous uh tragedies that we face. I mean would you agree with that? And and if so um uh does that tell us that the uh that the the solutions are a little bit more complex than than maybe you know the Mamluks in in the 13th century of which the Manduk offered in the 13th century. I mean colonialism is um you know I think the the crisis that maybe we as a Muslim community have not kind of fully unpacked or even understood historically. Um if if we if we kind of start with how did the Muslim community experience colonialism or how did Muslim world experience colonialism? Um the Portuguese is kind of the first instance of colonialism in the Muslim world in 1415 and that kind of marks the beginning and the end is then in the 1980s with the end of the British protectorate system which of course the British might say that's not colonialism but of course was a form of extractive colonialism maybe more economic in nature than than previous but a form of colonialism nonetheless. So 1415 to the 1980s you're talking about 500 years and in that time period I think what ended up happening and I kind of this is the way I frame it to many of my students is that it fundamentally disconnected Muslims from a deeper understanding of their history and it also made them more unsure about their present situation and unable to imagine futures that were grounded.
in their realities and their past and I think that is the most lasting impact of colonialism because if you cannot be connected to your history and you fundamentally cannot understand what is happening in your current context and make sense of that then how are you to imagine possible futures and that kind of epistemological violence which colonialism brought to the Muslim world we have now inherited as individuals ual living in the postcolonial world and we struggle with the same things. So we struggle with understanding Islamic history and its relevance for us today. We under we still struggle with our current kind of political context and sometimes understanding it often times it takes a great crisis for us to go back and and really try to sort out what's what's happening politically and socially in Muslim societies. Yeah. And then this question of imagining possible futures is also impacted. And so, you know, my my study of the colonial period, I look at legal institutions and their transformation and how it specifically impacted Islamic law. Um, because I think we we we kind of underestimate um the impact it had on law and continues to have on law. But I think more broadly the colonial project um was its most violent form and its most pernicious form and most continuous form is is really kind of the the epistemological way in which it's impacted how Muslims think um and how they how they imagine how they think and how they imagine. I mean explain that and and you know explain uh how that impacts us on a daily basis. the way we think, the way we imagine, you know, our our futures, I think you said, and our past, you know, I'll I'll give you a personal example. I grew up in a um a South Asian family. And um often times you would have the the jamaats that would come to uh the masjid where I used to go. And um of course when you know the jamat comes they they visit various you know homes and they talk to different people and I remember anytime my father would come home on jamaat and say you know the the jamaat is here I would feel like my weekend is ruined alas.
I have to hide in my room somewhere. they're going to come and they're going to be telling my father he has to have a beard and I have to wear hijab and and and I had a very negative understanding of the jamaat and I had a very even negative understanding of South Asian Islam. I felt it to be very rigid and violent and I I would look at you know the various things that were happening in South Asia and it almost seemed like why can't we as Muslims just get it together and it was a real sense of the problem is us as Muslims and it was only by by spending a lot of time kind of studying Islamic history and then focusing on the colonial period more recently that I even understood what the the blijamat was in terms of a movement of revival and resistance to effectively colonialism, right? And and postcolonialism and understanding that many of the things that I see and I witness in South Asia in terms of understandings of law, Islamic law, um the political structures, the violence and the chaos is is not self-generated. It is an inheritance of a system that was put in place in many ways to prevent proper development and and growth. And so I think that's what I mean by how we think, right? So my own kind of criticism of the Muslim community and the lack of organization of the Muslim community, all of these different understandings that I had was coming because I fundamentally didn't understand our history because I wasn't taught our history and I wasn't seen I I wasn't I grew up in a context in which you see kind of western models of development and modernization as the best ones and these are the aspirational ones.
So even when I when I think about and I imagine the future I'm imagining our Muslim societies developing towards that future that is the goal that's the tilos for everyone westernization modernization these institutions right um and that is where I think the limitation comes in because once you already say that that is the goal right then it limits your imagination if my goal is just to have an Oxford and a Cambridge and a Harvard and a heel in Pakistan or in India and and whatever society I'm living in then my imagination is already limited. Can I ask you about uh legal authority scholars? Um um as far as I understand it in Islamic history even during these periods of crisis uh the legal authorities remained fairly independent or independent from you know the the Mongols or whoever u were were destroying Muslim land. Um but colonialism did something a little different. It co-opted in many occasions on many occasions some of the legal authorities uh within the Muslim ummah even some of the institutes that that um uh the that uh pervade a Muslim world. Um can you just talk to that like how different was colonialism in the impact it had on our scholarly class to previous catastrophes that the most faced? Yeah, I mean the legal institutions are a great example to look at. So if we look at the case of um British colonization of India of course before that you have the Mughal Empire. The Mughal Empire is actually quite sophisticated in terms of their legal system. Um so they had courts, they had kadis, uh they had mutis of course giving independent judgments um and when colonial power came in one of the things that they did in kind of the late colonial period is um they set up courts. And when they're setting up these courts, they are saying okay these mul courts we've now dismantled them. So there's no such thing as the mul courts anymore now we just have the courts of of the the British and the East India the East India Company first and then the British after that but why would a Muslim go to this court right why would a Muslim come and why should I take my issue of divorce or inheritance or contract law to this court so they had to create a legitimacy and they did that in two ways one is that they took individuals who used to be kadis or muis and put them in the court as um what they were called native law officers so these to individuals that could advise the British judges. And then the other thing that they started doing is they started translating um texts of Hanafik into um English and eventually creating legal codes. And what they wanted to do is effectively kind of give the veneer of these are functioning as Sharia courts. And eventually what you have is even the appointment of Muslims in these Sharia courts. And and I trace um when this happens in the book and and what the how these judges think about Islamic law and all of these things. But what the British were very smart at doing is recognizing that if we want to penetrate into these communities, we have to co-opt their institutions, dismantle them or co-opt them. And they did both. And eventually what you end up having kind of in the late um colonial period is then a debate arising that the are waging around whether it's even legitimate for Muslims to go to these courts.
And so, uh, there were a group of scholars that said, you know, if you're a Muslim and you go to this court and they give you a divorce, doesn't mean you're divorced, right? Because your divorce hasn't been given by a and um what these what these Muslim kind of scholars outside of the courts were effectively saying is we've accepted the loss of political sovereignty. Yeah. Right.
The British have taken over at this point, but we will not reneg on the right of legal sovereignty for the community. And for me, it's that same kind of Jewanian moment of bifurcated power coming back that the the theat living under colonial rule are saying, "Okay, we've accepted that you're here. The jihad has failed." And you see this discourse really picking up post 1857 after the rebellion. Yeah. But when it comes to legal sovereignty, when it comes to our institutions, then we want to build those ourselves. Um, and so still you have some of the institutions that were founded in the colonial period, these daz and stuff still functioning until today in South Asia. And it's still that same attempt to say, well, the state should not be able to take over our our legal sovereignty. Right. I mean, do you think that modern Muslims um overestimate the uh importance of state power or the importance of capturing the state? You know, in in the 20th century, there were a number of projects by Muslim groups to recapture the caliphate or to re, you know, to to reinstate uh a central authority. um and and that's done at the expense of building institutions because it seems like your argument is that during these transitional periods as periods of crisis. The best thing we can do is build durable and strong independent institutions and maybe that's the precursor to uh to building political power in the future. Is that how you see it? Yeah, I mean I I definitely take a a bottomup approach, right? that these these durable institutions are not just um centers of power, but they're also um spaces of identity formation.
They're spaces of meaning making. They're spaces of um community regeneration. And if you think that um you know, establishing a state is all of a sudden going to then result in all of those things, that's not going to happen, right? And you need to have a cohesive community, a diverse, right? pluralistic but cohesive community in order for any state project to be successful. And many of the challenges and fissures that we're we're witnessing now in you know all over the world is because there is a huge problem of what happens when societies become hyper pluralistic and you have these big differences in terms of um uh within society. So if you don't have those institutions where people are gathering and they see them as meaning making, they see them as sources of stability and power then you're putting a lot of pressure on the state to fulfill everything for the individual. And I think part of the problem we see now in modern day societies is the state has a lot of pressure on it because it has to do everything. The state has to provide the institutions. It has to provide the law. It has to provide the meaning. It has to provide healthcare.
it has to provide all of these different things whereas historically it wasn't the state that was doing that and so I think especially for Muslim minority communities right Muslim communities living in the west um that we have to get into the mindset of institution building and um and how do we address the fractures within our own community because there's no there's no viable kind of state project without that I mean from your study of earlier periods I what attitudes or habits prevented Muslim societies from falling into total disrepair? I mean, you know, I do hear that um there were maybe a minority of voices after the fall of the uh the uh caliphate in Baghdad, but you know, who were who were saying that we now just have to prepare for punishment or the day of judgment. But that didn't seem to be the case for the vast majority of Muslims who were doing who were rebuilding and regenerating uh the Muslim Ummah. So what was it what was the deep reservoir they they they uh referred to uh that allowed them to to move forward in these periods of despair? I mean it's it's hard to know right because how do you know what is motiv you're you know in some ways it's how do you know what's motivating people? How do you know what is is is kind of pushing people forward and is the catalyst that is driving them? And that's I mean it's a it's a question that a historian will never be able to answer. But you know one thing I see is that regardless of what moment of crisis a scholar is writing in. Yeah. They harbor within them a very deep what I call like a theology of optimism. Right. that the optimism isn't coming from their own human experience necessarily because if they are looking at their human experience they are seeing the collapse of the caliphate or they're seeing problems right so their optimism isn't coming from uh their human experience or rational deduction but it's coming from their theology and what I mean by that is you know if we if we think about the Quran if we think about the life of the prophet sallallahu alaihi wasallam it's full of trial and tribulation and even if You look at prophetic stories, right? There's there's a real emotive way to read prophetic stories like the the you know the story of Ununice can be a story of alienation. The story of Mus Alisam again is a story of alienation and rejection and um you know almost a story of a refugee. Um the story of Alud Alisam, Ibraim Alisam. You have all of these challenges that these prophetic figures are going through yet all of them remain optimistic and they're all building right and they might not building be building institutions in the ways that we're thinking of today but there is this sense that despite the challenges they move forward and I think if we reflect on those and we really kind of embody this theology of optimism then we have no choice but to to move forward and to think about how do we [clears throat] build institutions that are resilient and how do we identify kind of that communal moral horizon and move towards it. So how would uh institution building what would it look like today like where would we start? I mean I I I speak of course uh today in in this wonderful um space you have aladila here in in Doha. just talk us through like your experience of of institution building and and how Muslims should go about uh developing these as you said robust institutions. You know, my my my story of how I entered up in Mujetta is quite interesting. But, you know, when I reflect back, I would say that from from my childhood until now, somehow I've always been connected to the Muslim community through the mosque, right? Um, it's either been, you know, the community center where I go on the weekend, it's where the Islamic school is, it's where you learn how to read Quran and learn Arabic when, especially for Muslims living in the West. Um and then you know even coming to a Muslim country you're looking at you know the massagid right as as as a space that you're coming and kind of continuously visiting. And for me you know when we talk about institution building there's the new institutions that we have to create and then there's the old ones that we have to revive and I think the mosque is the old institution that we have to revive because the masjid if you think about it has always been functioning. It was the first institution that the prophet sallallahu alaihi wasallam built even in in Mecca it was the first thing right and then in Medina it was the first thing and it's always served as kind of the load stone for uh education for regeneration for even addressing social issues you know famously um you know treaties were signed in the masjid uh tribes who were waring would come and they would come to you know debate in the masjid um Eid celebrations and festivals would happen in the masjid um emissaries would be received in the masjid so it wasn't just a place where you come and you pray and you leave. And I I think part of the you know actual colonial legacy is to think of the masjid as simply a place of prayer. Right? So you know that old idea of the the jam the sprawling mosque campus where you have soup kitchens and libraries and madrasas and you know uh craft gills attached to it is gone. Um but I don't think that uh needs to be the case. And so for me uh institutional regeneration should be centered around the masjid and I see mujad as an attempt to do that. And then when I think of the new institutions we have to find new institutions based on what we identify are the social needs of the community. So for example, if you look at like the Mamluks and the Muls, they were creating a postal system and they were creating water irrigation systems and they were creating um uh new forms of currency because they saw these as the challenges that needed to be addressed. So I think we as a community you know and it has to be a communal exercise I think have to identify what are the institutions that we need to now build and then we put our creative and financial power behind building those new institutions. I think education has to be key in that. I think civic engagement has to be key in that. I think media and representation has to be key in that. Um and these are some of the institutions that I think are being built. So can I ask you about Madila as a as a space? It's a women's only mosque. Is that how you you describe it? Um I mean that does seem uh a little innovative in in a way because of course mosques historically have been spaces where men and women come together and and and pray and and engage in in the other instit. But Mojad is women's is a women's only space.
U what's the idea behind that? So, Mujadila is a women's only space. So, uh we're a mazjid and then we also have a lot of other activities in terms of programming and research which I can get into.
But the idea behind it is you know we think about the mosque as an institution and there's millions of massagid around the world. Yeah. But if you actually start speaking to Muslim women about what their experience is in those massagid, they will tell you that it's often unwelcoming, that it's not a space that feels like it's actually curated or built for them. And this starts from the beginning where women are trying to figure out how do I even get inside, right? And then it's is the door locked. So many times I've been to a masjid and you know my brother will be able to get in, my father will be able to get in and I'm messaging them saying, "Well, the woman side is locked. Can you tell the imam to open the woman's side? So um it starts there and then it's you know the woman's space is often times very very small and there isn't programming for women. There isn't a focus on women and the mjad was really to try to center the Muslim woman and to say that if we want to talk about the regeneration of faith and community then that fundamentally has to center women as well. and is a project that's attempting to center women and doing so in the masjid because the masjid is the fundamental institution of society. Have you had any push back from from Muslims who say well why do we need a women's only space and maybe there are some unfortunately on social media who would who would say a women's only space that sounds very feminist to me that sounds very western to me like why you know so what is the um like how would you respond to to those I mean I I know they're they're baseless claims but how would you respond to those claims you know I usually um we had a lot of these criticisms early on we have less of them now but I always invite people to actually come and see what it is that we do because people either react to our name and um you know then we tell of course the story in the Quran um you know the revelation around yeah tell us a little bit about why why majad um so the name it can literally translate into the the woman who pleads or discourses um and it comes from surah mujad in the Quran which was revealed um when the female companion of the prophet sallallahu alaihi wasallam uh was divorced by her husband using a pre-Islamic form of divorce known as and uh which me which the the man basically says you are to me like the back of my mother. So she went to the prophet sallallahu alaihi wasallam and said is this actually legitimate form of divorce? Yeah. And the prophet um in the in the in the story and the way it's captured in the in the text is he was silent and he was waiting for revelation and then the revelation came in the beginning verses of right so Allah has verily heard the speech of the woman who has come to you um and has heard kind of the speech between you you and her right between the prophet sallallahu alaihi wasallam and this woman. And so when we were thinking about um what Mujad is fundamentally trying to do, it's trying to create a space for women to have conversation and to have dialogue, but to root that dialogue and conversation around the challenges of our time in religion, which is exactly what Kala did. She identified a problem and she sought a solution, but she went to the prophet sallallahu alaihi wasallam for that solution and then he waited for revelation. And it's a very powerful story even from the perspective of this woman who feels that she can go directly to the prophet sallallahu alaihi wasallam and her voice can be heard and she can be the reason of revelation. And we had an interesting paper last year at our conference um in which uh one of the scholars um talked about all of the different instances of revelation based around questions of women that you know sometimes we look for the names of women in the Quran and and we feel like oh there's only Assa and there's Mariam there isn't that many women named explicitly in the Quran but their voices are present in the revelation through all of these different reasons of of revelation. And so for us at you know what we're trying to do at Mojadila in terms of creating space um rooting that in faith um creating a sense of community it felt like Mujadila was the ideal name. I mean why is it important to have women at the center at the core of institutions beyond women's only spaces you know our masids in in the west tend to be occupied by you know men I mean most of our institutions uh community based institutions charities are are dominated by by men and why why is it important to have women in those spaces as well yeah I mean I think this is a conversation that um you know so many people are contending with because you know uh they think well the institutions are fine they're running as there is so why do we need to include women's voices and you know there's the there's the practical and then I think there's kind of the the religious I think the practical is that women do bring different ideas to the table their experiences are different um and having kind of a diversity of voices um around the table is a good thing so if you have you know 10 people on a mosque board and all of them have the same education or the same background the same language. So diversity always brings about I think more creative and interesting ideas and solutions. And so our our massag definitely have to diversify not just in terms of gender but in terms of language, cultural backgrounds. But I think the the the larger and this is kind of where I say the religious element of it is that our communities can only function if we include the full community that the prophet sallallahu alaihi wasallam you know was trying to be as inclusive to the community as possible and he included the voices of women and the Quran includes the voices of women. So when we create institutions and then we don't include those voices, for me there's a religious imperative there to make sure that that that we get the we get the the the maximum number of voices at the table and we include all of those voices which have historically been left out. And how do we build uh these robust institutions? I mean, I'm just thinking back to um Britain and and our institutions in Britain and often they lack uh you know, they they're they're pretty pretty rigid. They tend to be occupied by people who uh are not running these institutions in an effective way. They lack, you know, representation from women and young people. a lot of our young people are now establishing third spaces across the west rather than you know going to the mosque and and that's a shame in a way because the mosque as you said is at the center at the core of building good strong communities um how do we uh reinforce these institutions and and and make them work for the benefit of of our community and um I mean I think the biggest challenge that you've noted is um that the people are starting to create these third spaces because the mos masks aren't fulfilling their needs. And I can think of, you know, I lived in the UK and so I can think of many institutions, especially where the youth are starting to say, we're just going to go open up our own our own space. Um, I think what it requires is advocacy from within and pressure from outside, right? So, we need to make sure that there's individuals within the massagid that are advocating for some type of change.
And this is perhaps the hardest thing because you need to in many ways lobby mosque boards and speak to the imam and take the time out to actually have those difficult conversations because to simply say I'm going to go and create another institution is not going to address the problem because you're creating an institution parallel but you're not addressing the problem right and so you're actually creating fractures within the community. So I think there needs to be lobbying within about how can we actually address the problems that are happening in the massage and then other institutions and then pressure from without is the same individuals that are you know have now gone out and created these institutions they should be coming back and there should be partnerships there should be events together there should be attempts to say how can we build bridges and it's very easy I remember I grew up in Seattle and there was a street that had three different masjids and it was this is for the south south Asian community this is for the Sham community. This is for the Arab community. And they would sometimes even celebrate Eid on different days. Yeah.
And [clears throat] um I think we have to change and actually, you know, have inhabit a different mode of engagement, which is we might have differences in background and culture and language and all of those things, but we have to find ways to collaborate. And so more pressure internally, more pressure externally. Um and then I think oftentimes there's always a resource problem that our massagid do need better resourcing and until we also solve the resource problem one of the issues of space in women's mosque will always be well we don't have the money to create the space for women. I mean, if you were speaking directly to a young Muslim, especially post Gaza, I mean, I feel Gaza has become a a a catalyst for for regeneration really and and youth thinking within the Muslim um but many young Muslims feel excluded from community spaces but also feel overwhelmed by the sort of scale of the problem space in this um how do you u advise them to focus their energies?
Um, you know, the first thing I always tell kind of my students who ask me these types of questions is, have you identified a spiritual practice that truly fills your heart? A spiritual practice.
Yeah. Because I think often times we we go into activism mode. We go into what's the institution I have to build? What's the project I have to take on? What's the protest I have to go to?
What are what are the things that I need to do? [clears throat] And we forget that fundamentally, you know, the the the actual conclusion and our lives in general really hang in the in in in the hands of Allah. And until we we fill that element of ourselves, that work won't have as much meaning and purpose as we think it will. So I think we first have to start and this doesn't have to be for example fasting more or praying more or whatever it is. But I think we as Muslims have to as people of faith have to actually start by thinking if we want to have a positive impact in the community what is our relationship with Allah and how can I strengthen it and what am I doing that ensures that that practice is strengthened first and foremost. So I always give that as the starting advice to to to my students. And then the second thing I say to them is when it comes to actually identifying what it is that you have that that you want to do that you really need to think about what's the problem you're trying to solve and work backwards. So if you're trying to solve the mazjid problem then you really have to put all of your energy and efforts towards that. M and if you're trying to solve a political problem then you have to think about what are the efforts and energy you can put towards that and what you realize is that you know and I work with students often times is even the students that are trying to solve the political problem what they realize is they can't solve the political problem without starting with the community and starting really from again what are we building from the ground from grassroots upwards and so um you know sometimes the biggest problem that we want to solve actually starts with the smallest of actions We see this with elections. They, you know, the most successful candidates are the ones that are going doortodoor and connecting with people. And so for me, it's connect with your community, build institutions that are meaningful in your community, connect with Allah. And um you know there's that that beautiful hadith of the prophet sallallahu alaihi wasallam in which he says if the hour has come still plant the seed, right? And so um you know we have to plant the seed. And there's another beautiful hadith and I I remind myself of this one a lot is you know the the prophet sallallahu alaihi wasallam said you know the the believer who mixes with people and is patient with them is better than the believer that does not mix with people and is not patient with them. And it's a reminder that working in the community and building institutions is not easy. Yeah. Um and that in that process we have to be patient with one another and um the only way to actually create communal institutions is to recognize that the community is very diverse and it's not going to be kind of unified in the way that we might think and that's okay and power doesn't have to be held by one person. They can be held by many people. Yeah.
Um so I think having the awareness think taking these lessons from history is really important.
Um, I spoke to an elderly gentleman uh recently who said to me that the Muslim is doomed. Like we're we're now at a stage where we can only really just wait for Allah's punishment because um everything has been tried and and we're just not going to be able to in your words regenerate this this um once again. I mean there is this mindset of gloom that that that does exist within some circles of the musma and the idea that we're now in perpetual decline and we just have to wait for Allahh's judgment on on the matter. I mean what if anything gives you hope uh with our situation today? I mean I don't think I think I think we like to look at the world in binaries too much right. So we're either in a moment of decline or we're in a moment of regeneration. M um you know we're in a moment of rupture or we're in a moment of continuity and these dichotoies and these binaries are are really helpful if we're trying to make you know quick judgments about what's happening in our moment but they're not very useful right so even colonialism when people say is it is it continuity right is there historical continuity or is it just all rupture um and the Muslim community can't kind of salvage itself after this uh incredible rupture and anytime you dig into these moments, you realize that both of these things always exist simultaneously, right? So decline always exists alongside rupture and and um uh regeneration. And I always go back for me what gives me hope is I always go back and I think as a Muslim there can be nothing sadder, more tragic than the passing of the prophet sallallahu alaihi wasallam. And in that moment it was the same thing. Is this a rupture? Is this the kalas, the moment of decline? We've lost our connection to Allah and therefore this community cannot continue. Or is this a moment of continuity and regeneration where we find a way to kind of pull ourselves out by our bootstraps and continue?
And for me, the the choice of the companions was very clear and the choice of every community after that was very clear. And so we have to be comfortable with the fact that we are living in a moment in which both decline and regeneration are happening at the same time. And as individuals we have to be mindful of what is causing the decline, who is causing the decline, how do we push against the decline. But we also have to be very mindful then of what are our possibilities of regeneration and how are we participating in that? And that is, you know, the the, you know, they say the the believer is always between fear and hope. And I think this is a perfect moment for that. Fantastic. Well, before we close, can I ask you about another project that you've been working on uh which is a podcast called More Muslim? Um I mean tell us a little bit about that and uh what you hope to achieve from it. Yeah. So speaking of institution building, you know, More Muslim was our attempt to um create a podcast that centers um the voices of Muslim women um and the Muslim experience more broadly um in a way that we feel right now is not being done. So often times um you know the podcasts that are being done about Muslims are focusing on narratives of this is what a good Muslim is and this is what a bad Muslim is. but capturing the the daily experiences of how people are living faith and the challenges of of living with faith uh is not really being captured. And so what we decided is to create a podcast that's more in kind of an audio documentary style. So we take a historical issue or a contemporary issue um or kind of a forgotten experience that a Muslim woman has um or a Muslim in general has and then do a lot of research and conversation around it and then design um these audio documentaries basically um about 30 to 45 minutes. And our hope is to shed light on um lived faith and um lived challenges and also at the same time create a space for Muslims to feel like they can tell their own stories and that their faith doesn't have to be seen as only through this lens as I said of good and bad or a pious believer or non-pest believer, a bad Muslim or a good Muslim. And so that's why we kind of playfully titled um the podcast more Muslim, right? that we're all kind of striving in some ways to be more Muslim and our experiences reflect that. Well, may Allah give you baraka to your project and to this mah very uh stunning and amazing center you have here in in Dha and uh thank you so much for your time today Dr. It's a pleasure. Asalam alaikum. Now, you've reached the end of this show, and the fact that you've stayed until the very end tells me that you truly believe in our work. Please consider making a one-off donation or becoming a member by visiting thinkingmusim.com/membership.
Now, your contributions give you exclusive behind-the-scenes access and the ability to ask questions to our guests and monthly calls with myself, my team and our guests like Sami Hamdi and keep us in your duas.
Related Videos

osman bey happy and sad moments
FateheUmmat
201 views•2026-04-19

Gregory Williams lecture "Life on the Color Line", 1999-09-14
BallStateUniversityLibraries
1K views•2019-07-31

5 National Parks To Visit In PA's Laurel Highlands
Redoubt_Productions
433 views•2025-06-14

Uncovered Untold Histories by Prof. Touraj Atabaki
elaheomidyarmir-djalaliins6723
148 views•2025-01-22

A Super Quick History of Bulgaria
MrHistory1
69K views•2019-09-12

Won Over: Reflections of a Federal Judge on His Journey from Jim Crow Mississippi
ndhistoricalsociety
212 views•2019-12-09

St Andrew's Day: Explained, a little.
visitscotland
36K views•2019-11-30

The Times Atlas of World History | Wikipedia audio article
wikipedia-fan02
290 views•2019-06-16
Trending

This is DISGUSTING
theroyalrogue
25K views•2026-07-24

Nobody Respected The Penguin | The Batman (2004)
SerumLake
12K views•2026-07-24

And Now He Is Coming For More
TheFinePrintYT
12K views•2026-07-24

U.S. BANKS JUST SIGNALED *CLARITY ACT* IS COMING!? WHITE HOUSE AUGUST DEADLINE & XRP REPRICE!
GoodEveningCrypto
10K views•2026-07-24