In AI coding model benchmarking, the primary evaluation metrics include strict pass rate (number of tasks completed without errors), repair attempts (number of corrections needed after initial failure), and token efficiency (number of tokens used to achieve results). Models achieving zero repairs with perfect pass rates rank highest, while cost efficiency and token usage serve as tiebreakers within performance tiers.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Which AI model is best at coding right now?Added:
I just ran four new models through my coding at Benchmark and here is the updated leaderboard. The coding Benchmark for context test three tasks, a bug fix, a refactor, and a migration task. Each model gets one repair attempt if the first try fails. The primary metric is whether the model posts a clean strict pass with repairs and cost used as a tiebreaker inside each tier.
The top of the board is a clean full pass cluster. Nine models all posted a three out of three strict pass result.
GPT 5.5 takes the number one spot and it's the first model in this Benchmark to do it with zero repairs. Every other model in this cluster needed at least one repair. GPT 5.4 drops to number two as a result. Grok 4.3 enters at number three and is a really strong new entrant at just 13 cents. It's the most cost efficient row in the entire clean pass group. And the reason why it comes in at number three behind GPT 5.4 despite being cheaper is that one of the other tiebreakers in this Benchmark is output token efficiency. GPT 5.4 used 6,800 tokens to get the same result that Grok 4.3 did using 13,000 tokens. So that token efficiency is what put GPT 5.4 in second place. If you care more about cost over token efficiency, then Grok 4.3 is definitely competitive and potentially just as good as GPT 5.4 on this Benchmark. We then have another new model, Qwen 3.6 Max Preview at number eight.
Opus 4.7 then comes in at number nine.
Technically a clean pass, but it's the only model in the cluster using two repairs. That's why it sits at the bottom of that group. Then we have GLM 5.1 at 10 with a soft pass on format.
And DeepSeek V4 Pro comes in at number 11. It had two strict passes, but a failed refactor after the repair. So it comes in at the bottom of the coding Benchmark. If you want to see the full breakdown of how this Benchmark works and also where all models rank on the multi-turn Benchmark and the Open Code and Human Eval Benchmarks, click the link below to watch the full video.
Related Videos
OpenHuman VS Hermes AI: Who Wins?
JulianGoldieSEO
285 views•2026-05-29
BREAKING: Microsoft’s New Image Generating Model Beat Out GPT 1.5 and Nano Banana 2
aimmediahouse
122 views•2026-06-03
Long-Running Agents — Build an Agent That Never Forgets with Google ADK
suryakunju
142 views•2026-05-30
This computer is made from real human brain cells. And you can buy it.
Talktmsmedia
3K views•2026-05-28
I Made the Same Anime Fight Scene in Every AI Video Generator
NobleGooseAnime
295 views•2026-05-30
Nvidia Bets Big On AI PCs | New Chip To Power Windows Laptops | Technology | AI Updates | N18S
cnnnews18
3K views•2026-06-01
I Tested NEW Opus 4.8 on Four Projects (Updated LLM Leaderboard)
AICodingDaily
298 views•2026-05-29
3D Platformer Update - NO CAPES
SolarLune
294 views•2026-05-30











