Police Arrest Woman After Bar Assault - what happened after | Bodycam Police & Analysis

Added: 2026-05-26

[00:00:00]Go ahead and stop, ma'am.

[00:00:03]Ma'am, go ahead and stop.

[00:00:06]You're going to STAND UP FOR GO AHEAD AND STOP. YOU'RE UNDER YOU'RE UNDER ARREST. PUT YOUR HANDS BEHIND YOUR BACK.

[00:00:16]PUT YOUR HANDS BEHIND YOUR BACK. YOU'RE UNDER ARREST. On May 24th, 2025, officers responded to a reported bar disturbance involving physical assault.

[00:00:25]The subject had allegedly attacked multiple patrons, assaulted bar staff, and fled on foot at officer contact.

[00:00:33]I'm not doing anything. You got a classic for us.

[00:00:36]No, I'm not doing anything.

[00:00:41]Take a deep breath. Can you stand up for us? We'll help you.

[00:00:44]All right. I can breathe. I can breathe.

[00:00:46]I'm asking if you're hurt at all. Are you hurt at all? Cuz you ran from us when we kind of pushed you to the ground, are you hurt at all?

[00:00:53]Can you get my arms? We'll get you everything.

[00:00:56]Can you answer my question? What did I do wrong?

[00:00:58]>> Well, we told you to stop it and you took off running from us, okay?

[00:01:02]Are you hurt at all? Can you answer that?

[00:01:05]You guys are hurting my arms.

[00:01:07]Where are we hurting your arms? Right here. Right here.

[00:01:09]>> Okay. I'm not holding you very tight.

[00:01:11]Are you hurt at all? Yeah, I am. Okay.

[00:01:14]Do you want to see medics? Yes.

[00:01:18]We'll get you We'll get you away from the road.

[00:01:22]WHY ARE YOU DOING THIS TO ME?

[00:01:25]YOU'RE NOT GOING TO GO.

[00:01:30]ALL RIGHT. BEFORE I DO ANYTHING ELSE, YOU DO HAVE THE RIGHT TO remain silent.

[00:01:33]Anything you say can and will be used against you in court. You have the right to talk to a lawyer for advice. If you cannot afford one, one will be appointed to you. And if you do choose to answer questions, you can stop answering them anytime. Do you understand that?

[00:01:43]All right, you just added another charge for resisting, okay? [clears throat] Do you understand that?

[00:01:49]And possibly assault too, while you're at it, okay? So, let's lay on your side so you can breathe. And if you kick again or anything like that, there's going to be even more charges. Do you understand that?

[00:02:00]Do you understand that?

[00:02:04]Do you understand?

[00:02:09]Break out.

[00:02:12]Break out.

[00:02:13]What's your name?

[00:02:23]There we go.

[00:02:25]There we go.

[00:02:32]What followed raises three distinct legal questions. The validity of the warrantless arrest, the adequacy of the Miranda advisement under the circumstances, and the proportionality of force applied. The Fourth Amendment permits a warrantless arrest in a public place where probable cause exists.

[00:02:48]United States versus Watson, 423 US 411, established that standard in 1976.

[00:02:55]Here, officers had first-hand witness accounts of physical assault on multiple individuals, documented property destruction, and active flight at the moment of contact. Under Illinois versus Wardlow, 528 US 119, flight from police is a relevant factor in the totality of circumstances supporting probable cause.

[00:03:15]On multiple independent grounds, the arrest is constitutionally sound. At 1 minute 31 seconds into the footage, the officer delivers a complete Miranda advisement. Miranda versus Arizona, 384 US 436, requires that warnings be given before custodial interrogation, not merely before custody alone. The subject at that moment was restrained on the ground, visibly agitated, and potentially impaired. The delivery conditions were not ideal for genuine comprehension. That is a legitimate procedural concern. However, no custodial interrogation followed the advisement. Officers did not ask the subject about the underlying offense.

[00:03:53]Without interrogation, Miranda's exclusionary rule has no application.

[00:03:57]The constitutional purpose was served.

[00:04:00]Best practice in most department training standards call for Miranda delivery after the subject is calm and secured in a controlled environment where comprehension can be reasonably assumed. This was not that environment.

[00:04:11]Are you the bartender? Yeah.

[00:04:15]Real quick, can I just get your information?

[00:04:18]Okay, so what's going on?

[00:04:20]Uh so she came in, she was up here yesterday. Uh she she left on her tab and then when we went to run it, it went through for half of the price. It was like a It's around 50 bucks. So when she came in today, she wanted to pay the other half.

[00:04:35]So she paid only she only paid half yesterday?

[00:04:37]>> She paid well, her card got declined. So uh it just she didn't have the money for the whole The whole tab. But she left before we could like she never tabbed out. She just left.

[00:04:47]She started she had a couple drinks.

[00:04:48]>> This is today.

[00:04:50]Faded uh had a couple drinks. She started pissing people off. So we're trying to figure out how to get her out of here.

[00:04:55]And then one of the regulars said something. She went to attack a regular.

[00:05:00]And that got broken up real quick. And then she went back to go get her.

[00:05:04]>> And when she went to attack the the regular, what do you mean by that? What did she do? She She >> on her?

[00:05:09]>> Yes. She tried to lay her hands on her, but it got broken up real quick. I'm not sure if she got any punches in on that first one or not. We got it on camera.

[00:05:16]Okay. Like a stack of plastic cups. And just cuz there's a lot of information, trying to make sure that You're right.

[00:05:20]After that first uh the regular she's fighting with or whatever, you guys break it up. After that, then she's trying to leave and smashes a bunch of cups.

[00:05:26]>> She tried to go back after the regular again and that's when I grabbed her and started walking her toward the door. And she started halfway through, she started getting shitty with me, started shoving me and I said, "You got to go."

[00:05:37]On the way out she smacked a stack of plastic cups and it hit this old man's glass and glass broke everywhere on this old couple. Okay, so she's So now it's like plastic cup and assault because she's got broken glass flying all over people.

[00:05:54]Yeah, who was assaulted by? Was that It was a couple sitting next to us who They were sitting there next to us cuz the glass broke and Gotcha.

[00:06:01]>> was right next to me. Okay.

[00:06:04]Um so you but you guys witnessed it though? All that? Okay.

[00:06:07]>> Uh did she and she punched you?

[00:06:09]She threw multiple punches. Yeah, she was pretty angry.

[00:06:12]>> By the time he got her out, she went full attack on him out in front. Yeah, and She took four good swings at him and then he he went to protect himself and then they went out of my my line of sight.

[00:06:24]>> Gotcha. in the front and And all the guys in the bar went out there to help him. She's a big girl. She's a Are you wanting to file assault charges?

[00:06:32]>> Uh yes, assault and definitely uh trespassing. Okay.

[00:06:37]All right. Let's see if we can get her up and >> stand you up, okay?

[00:06:41]We'll get her in, all right. Thank you.

[00:06:58]Where we going? This one? Sure. Okay.

[00:07:00]This looks like a good one.

[00:07:02]Watch.

[00:07:08]I got her husband on the phone.

[00:07:10]Okay.

[00:07:11]Oh no.

[00:07:13]Do you want to talk to him, ma'am?

[00:07:14]>> to talk to your husband? Robin, yes, please. Robin.

[00:07:18]It's a Robin.

[00:07:21]I am so I'm in trouble.

[00:07:27]No.

[00:07:28]>> [laughter] >> Is it me or your medications or what?

[00:07:33]No, nothing to do with you. It's just me.

[00:07:43]Just come here. Be dogs.

[00:07:47]Now, please be with the dogs. They're taking me to jail.

[00:07:50]Just come be with the dogs, please.

[00:07:57]All right, Joe. We'll be out with you, okay?

[00:07:59]Let us know if you need anything.

[00:08:02]Back one.

[00:08:04]Hey, Joe. Can you just talk to me? I have a quick question for you.

[00:08:14]Hey, Joe.

[00:08:21]Do you want me to start the rubber again?

[00:08:35]All right, sit up for me, Billy Joe.

[00:08:37]Sit up. Come on.

[00:08:45]Good.

[00:08:46]Billy Joe, I left the fire department.

[00:08:49]Billy Joe, open your eyes.

[00:08:52]Open your eyes for me.

[00:08:56]The Supreme Court established in Graham versus Connor, 490 US 386, that force must be judged by an objective reasonableness standard, not with the benefit of hindsight. Three factors govern that analysis. The severity of the underlying crime, whether the subject posed an immediate threat, and whether the subject was actively resisting or attempting to evade. All three were present. The crime involved physical assault on multiple persons.

[00:09:23]The subject fled. The subject resisted restraint. The physical control techniques applied takedown and handcuffing fall within the soft empty hand control tier of the use of force continuum appropriate for an actively resistant subject. The force was objectively reasonable. What requires separate analysis is the officer's conduct after restraint. The 14th Amendment imposes a duty of care on officers once a subject is in custody.

[00:09:49]Deliberate indifference to a detainee's serious medical need is unconstitutional. In this footage, officers asked three separate times whether the subject was injured. When she reported arm pain, the officer acknowledged it and adjusted grip. A medic was requested.

[00:10:05]When the subject briefly lost responsiveness, officers immediately issued rousing commands. That response pattern consistent, attentive, and documented on camera is the legal standard in practice. It holds up. The officer added charges of resisting arrest and assault. During the restraint sequence, resisting a lawful arrest is a separate offense from the underlying crime. Most state statutes define it as intentionally fleeing or physically obstructing an officer engaged in making a lawful arrest. Flight on foot, physical struggle upon contact, and continued non-compliance during restraint collectively establish the elements of that offense under any commonly applicable state framework. The reference to a felony charge later in the footage suggests the assault on an officer or injury to a third party triggered a charge elevation. Without the arrest report, the specific predicate cannot be confirmed. I'll see you later.

[00:11:00]I can't see you, bye.

[00:11:01]Oh. Help us.

[00:11:03]No, no, no.

[00:11:05]Help. No, NO, NO. NO, NO, NO. NO. I KNEW IT.

[00:11:10]OH.

[00:11:10]NO, NO, NO, NO.

[00:11:13]NO.

[00:11:14]NOW YOU'RE GETTING A FELONY. I don't want Yeah, I know you don't, well, you're getting one anyway. Oh.

[00:11:21]Anyone else want to ride along?

[00:11:23]Yeah, I can ride.

[00:11:24]Okay.

[00:11:29]You got to have much of a problem.

[00:11:32]A little bit. will Um oh also this time we're doing stuff this long so it's all staff day and she's screaming this stuff. What do you feel? Oh that one?

[00:11:45]All right [laughter] you guys know our cameras will be on while we're in here so don't expect us to do anything.

[00:11:51]Yeah we're good.

[00:12:01]I can't breathe and please help me.

[00:12:12]Hold your head still.

[00:12:31]I'm going to take this off and just put it with your other stuff, okay?

[00:12:33]It might get fall off in the seat belt and all that and I don't want that to happen.

[00:12:37]Put your window down on the other side and then you can see if it's up for you.

[00:12:39]Is something in the way? No. It's kind of I see it's not super comfortable.

[00:12:43]All right sit there I'm going to hand the seat belt across off to Greg so he can buckle it in for you.

[00:12:50]We'll turn the heat up once we get going here. Thank you.

[00:12:53]All right is that okay?

[00:12:55]All right give us just one a couple minutes, all right?

[00:12:59]The primary officer receives a B plus.

[00:13:01]The arrest was constitutionally valid.

[00:13:03]The force applied was proportionate under Graham versus Connor. Post restraint welfare conduct exceeded the minimum legal standard. Active, documented, and consistent. The single area of concern is Miranda delivery mid struggle. While not a constitutional violation in the absence of interrogation, it reflects a procedural shortcut that creates unnecessary documentation risk in future proceedings. The secondary officers receive a B.

[00:13:30]The bartender interview was methodical and legally sufficient to document probable cause across multiple charges.

[00:13:37]Transport procedures were attentive and welfare appropriate. Minor professionalism lapses audible on camera are noted but do not rise to a legal or disciplinary concern. The subject receives a C+. The Fourth Amendment does not protect the right to resist a lawful arrest even one the subject believes is unjust. The appropriate remedy for an unlawful arrest is a legal challenge, not physical resistance. The subject's verbal assertion of non-resistance was legally aware. Her physical conduct was not. Credit is given for de-escalating once restrained and for handling the phone call without further incident.

[00:14:12]Three takeaways from this footage for both officers and citizens.

[00:14:15]First, Miranda is not a checkbox to rush through. Timing and comprehension conditions matter, not for constitutional validity alone, but for evidentiary integrity in subsequent proceedings. Second, welfare documentation is legal protection. Every injury inquiry and every welfare check on camera is a direct defense against deliberate indifference claims under the Fourteenth Amendment. Third, for citizens, resisting a lawful arrest compounds every charge on the table.

[00:14:44]What began as a misdemeanor disturbance carried potential felony exposure by the time the transport vehicle door closed.

[00:14:50]The courtroom is the correct venue to challenge an unlawful arrest. The street is not. Let us know if there is an interaction or legal topic you would like us to cover in the comments below.

[00:14:59]Thank you for watching and don't forget to check out our second channel Audit the Court for even more police interaction and courtroom content.