This analysis mistakes basic optical perspective for systemic manipulation, proving that even "critical" scrutiny fails when it ignores the fundamental laws of geometry. It is a classic case of over-intellectualizing a profound misunderstanding of how focal lengths and distances actually work.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Selective Tech Limits? This Doesn’t Make SenseAdded:
It sounds more like what they were doing was taking the files from the cameras, putting them onto laptops that they had on board the spacecraft, and then transferring just selected images back to NASA, with the rest of the images and the videos waiting until they return to Earth. At least that is the impression that I got based on one of Reid's update videos after he'd returned to Earth. Uh, I really want to go through our photos.
They are starting to trickle into building eight here at the Johnson Space Center, and I think I want to do a couple compilations of photos and just talk about what we were thinking as we were taking them, how we took them, show you some of the the miss photos that we had, and then how we would walk our way into just a perfect photo from that amazing mission. I think it'll be fun for me. So, during the mission itself, NASA released a few photos that were taken as they were passing around the backside of the moon. And I saw quite a number of people on social media, particularly flat-earthers, who for years have been saying, "Why can't anybody just show us a picture of the Earth from space?" Then, having been given these photos of the Earth from space, shifted to go on about how NASA were only releasing photos, and why no videos, as that apparently means it must be fake. So, now that this video's been released, the goalposts have gone for a walk again.
>> First of all, just asking you for the photos don't mean we're just going to accept them without scrutiny. When we scrutinize the photos that we asked you for, we can find a deception that we knew we would find. For example, if you take a look at the photo that he's sharing right here, look at how close up we are to the moon. Look at how much detail we can see on the moon's surface from where the camera is positioned.
Compare that to footage right here of how much detail we can see of the sun.
So, we have two different cameras, and both of these cameras are positioned very close to the body that they're recording. So close that we can have very detailed footage of the surface activity and the surface detail just like we're doing here. Now, this camera is able to give us this transmission back to Earth in 4K with no limitations, but we can't get photos from Artemis without bandwidth problems, without file size problems, and it takes more file space to send 4K video like this, and you got to send it through the radiation field that surround the Sun, but yet we lose signal when Artemis has a plasma shield around it, which is the same thing that the Sun have around it.
Something else we need to think about.
Dave is showing us this image right here. The Moon is 238,000 mi away from Earth. Look at the size of the Earth from right here. From the surface of the Moon, which is roughly where we're positioned here, where the camera is, look at the size of the Earth.
Here is the Earth right here from a million miles away.
The photo I'm showing you right now is taken by NASA's Deep Space Climate Observatory satellite, and this is the Earth from a million miles away, and it's to scale. The photo is to scale. So, we can cancel out any excuses or arguments about NASA editing the photo to change the scale of it because that'll defeat the purpose of the photo.
This particular image of Earth is from a million miles away, and Earth is actually bigger in this image than it is in this image. And I want to know, how can a Earth be bigger from a million miles away than it is from just 238,000 mi away. The scales are off. The scales are inconsistent with what we should see in reality. This next image right here is directly from NASA's website, and this is a picture of Earth from 22,000 mi above the Earth, 22,000 mi away, and we can see the moon right there in the corner as well. And the question we got to ask ourselves is how is the Earth the same size at 22,000 mi as it is at a million miles?
So, we can see here this photo is from a million miles away. This one is from 22,000 mi, and they're the same size. Another scale issue that I want to point out about a lot of these Artemis photos, particularly the ones that have the Earth and moon in the same frame, is that the Earth and the moon are the exact same size when the moon should be a little bitty tiny rock in comparison to the Earth. This is what we're being taught. We're being taught that the moon is like 27% the size of Earth in diameter. And I can give you guys a scale that they actually teach us with in school. So, here is a scale that you can pull up from any scientific website to show you that the moon, like I said, is only 27% the size of the Earth diameter. What would happen, everyone, if I zoom out? If I leave Earth, how would I see the Earth and the moon?
Something like this. You see what's happening when I zoom out? When you zoom in, it's going to maintain the same ratio as you zoom out. So, you will never get away from the Earth and the Moon, and they now all of a sudden are the exact same size because now you will be debunking your own proportions that you taught us.
And these are just things they forget about when they're faking this stuff. Is the Earth and the Moon the same size or are they not? Because when we leave the Earth and look at the Earth and the Moon in the same frame, it should look similar to this. It should never look like this. When you lie, you just can't be consistent all the time. Now, I know what some people are going to say.
They're going to say, "Sanchez, the images that you're showing the Earth, for example, this one which shows Earth from a million miles away, they're going to say, "Sanchez, this isn't the correct scale. NASA actually zoomed in or they zoomed out or they blow photos up." This is what a lot of globe earthers will say. So, let me go ahead and give them a argument to rebuttal that. Flat earthers accuse NASA of manipulating photos to benefit their claims. And when we say that, globalists tell us, "NASA don't mess with the scale of the objects." But when we point out stuff like this, they will turn around and say, "Well, NASA do change the scale." So, let's hear the truth. Rules on how they process photos.
NASA does process images before releasing them, but the type of editing matters. Many space images, especially from telescopes, are composites built from different wavelengths like infrared or x-rays, and colors are often assigned so features the human eye can't naturally see becomes visible.
Now, we know what this mean. This basically mean we just CGI everything.
Because if you got a photo and you taking a picture of an object, just give us the picture. But they saying what they're getting is a bunch of different wavelengths and they translate that to data. That's kind of deceptive cuz a lot of y'all thinking that they just snapping these images.
So, why do you need a camera to record wavelength data, but you're telling us that the cameras are taking still photos? That's deception. That's to explain away the fact that they never snapped the image of a still photo from the beginning. They start with a bunch of proposed data and they interpret that into these images we see. These are never photos that they shot from space.
And we just read that. But let's read on cuz we finna get to the part that's going to prove what I'm saying about they don't change the scale of these images.
Adjustments to contrast, brightness, and sharpness are also made so important details aren't lost, but none that is about changing the size of objects. It's about making complex data understandable. When it comes to scale, NASA typically preserves it or clearly labels when something isn't to scale, often including scale bars, distances, or explanatory captions. So, no one can now make the argument that "Well, these aren't the correct scale, Sanchez."
Because unless that's noted on the photo, it is the correct scale, especially when dealing with distances. When when they're telling us this photo was taken from this amount of miles away and etc. You have to give us the correct scale, otherwise what's the point of these type of photos? It'll be inaccurate.
These are for scientific purposes and this is the kind of data that globe earthers pull up to show flat earthers, here take that. NASA doesn't manipulate the scale and size of the photos.
Related Videos
Is dark matter real? - Why can't we find it? - physicist explains | Don Lincoln and Lex Fridman
LexClips
1K views•2026-05-30
Saptarshi Basu - Spectacular Voyage of Droplets: A Multiscale Journey to Extreme Flow Conditions
DAlembert-SU-CNRS
152 views•2026-06-02
A 6.0 Just Hit Hawaii — And It Came From The Wrong Place
TerraWatchHQ
115 views•2026-06-03
The Split-Second Mistake That Made Bouncing Bettys So Deadly
NoMansLandChannel
253 views•2026-06-02
Nobody Expected This Lava Reaction 🤯 #faits #facts
TendzDora
28K views•2026-05-30
The Silent Memory of Glass
UnchartedScienceworld
146 views•2026-05-30
The Difference In Charged And Neutral Particles
heavybrainspace
959 views•2026-05-29
A380 vs Every Vehicles Crash Test Challenge | Which One Win?
BeamLap
163 views•2026-05-29











