This video documents a Connecticut parole revocation hearing for inmate Tiger Dash (MA #410792), revealing the complex multi-stage parole system where inmates must complete rehabilitation programs like domestic violence training while maintaining employment and community ties. The hearing process involves multiple stages: initial parole hearings, preliminary revocation hearings to establish probable cause, and final revocation hearings where the parole board makes the ultimate decision. Dash's case illustrates systemic challenges including the burden of completing multiple programs, the subjective nature of program completion requirements, and the tension between rehabilitation goals and public safety concerns. The video demonstrates how parole revocation hearings can result in extended confinement periods (Dash received a 7-month sanction) despite demonstrated rehabilitation efforts, highlighting the gap between parole conditions and practical implementation.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
I Followed an Inmate for 1,095 Days. Here is the Truth.Added:
uh a little bit, but also is the fact that he you made me sign a misconduct report for that day stating that the officer of the day gave me your contact information and then tried to tell me that there's video. So where's the video? Because she didn't give me your contact information and then you tried to blatantly yell at me and tell me that I should have your contact information.
How you sent me to prison?
Those of you familiar with the channel will know what time it is. It is a Connecticut parole revocation hearing.
But those new here, welcome aboard.
You're about to gain insight into something that is mostly a big kept secret. And that is when someone gets sent to prison, they get a long sentence, but it's often a gimmick. Much of that sentence is suspended. And then also there's something called parole.
And then when someone goes on parole, they can get that parole revoked. But in the state of Connecticut, it's not such a simple process getting it revoked. You see, the state will pay for an attorney on their behalf. And the attorney will have a combative experience with the parole officer. And then there is a third party that makes a decision whether or not this prisoner should get revoked or can go back into the streets.
So before we watch this revocation hearing, we are going to do my favorite thing and take a flashback to the past to watch's original parole hearing so you can have the full picture so you can see exactly how this system works. And with that, let's jump in.
>> My name is Tiger Dash, MA number 410792.
This hearing is being conducted in consideration of the pro application for tit 410792.
He is serving a total effective sentence of 5 years flat for third f failure to appear second violation of protective order two counts of failure to appear first and violation of probation of the underlying charge of robbery second. As of today records reflect a parole eligibility date of July 13, 2024. There is no victim input in this case. There is an offender accountability plan. It has been reviewed and shows that the offender has completed domestic violence tier 2 and the inside out pro prison exchange program. In addition, Mr. Dash has maintained employment and he is a current student in the second chance PEL program utilizing the statewide collaborative offender risk evaluation system. The offender's overall score on the SRT falls within the high range of history recidivism. Mr. Dash, this is your opportunity to express to the board why you believe should be granted the role. You may begin.
>> Good morning. Thank you for your time and consideration. The first thing I would like to say is how sorry I am to any to anyone either hurt indirectly or directly with the crimes that I have committed.
I take full accountability and responsibility for the crimes that I had committed. At the time that these crimes took place, I was experiencing one of the hardest times in my life. My little cousin was murdered and his killing sent me down a downward spiral. Even with that being said, I still take full accountability and responsibility for my actions. And in no way, shape, or form does that take away from the crimes that I committed.
Today, I can say that I am not the same young man that I was 26 months ago. I have a 19-month-old baby boy at home waiting and depending on me. He is my greatest inspiration and motivation. And I am very devoted to the growth and betterment of myself because in order for me to be a great father, I have to first be a better me.
And with doing that, I become great for the both of us. And with already missing 19 months of his life and possibly more, I dedicated myself to growth and improvement. While being incarcerated, I got a job as a ter. I went back to school with the second chance program for business management. I also took place in the inside out program. I also did tarot two and domestic violence dedicated to my growth and improvement so I would not end up incarcerated again and away from my son any longer. I am asking for a chance to prove that all this work I've been doing was not for nothing.
Thank you for your time once more.
>> Thank you Mr. Dash. That very well done.
Appreciate that a lot that you uh took the time and were able to tell us a little bit about what was going on and where you're at. So, we're going to be asking you some questions and Mr. Paul will begin with the questions.
>> Thank you, Madam Chair. Morning, Mr. Dash.
>> That's a good statement. There's a lot of positive things happening on the outside and uh you're doing your part by taking care of things on the inside.
Um certainly uh it's really like an incredibly positive thing that uh you connected with Konipiac, right?
>> Yes.
>> And uh you have a chance to make something meaningful of your life, right?
>> Yes.
And uh certainly I mean you've been in programs on the outside, you know, both in and outpatient, right?
>> Yes.
>> And um you know, got tier two in there.
Maybe cleared your head a little bit.
What What direction you think you're going when it comes to uh recovery plans?
Um, with with my tier 2 program that I just took in here, I really got to see that drugs and alcohol caused probably a lot more conflict than I would have been in if I wasn't under the influence. So, for me, it's more about staying sober and staying dedicated to being around my son and work.
>> Um, what do you think about personal connections, though? Do you think that's part of part of being able to do that kind of thing?
>> Um, I would say yeah.
It depends because you have to be strong willed and empowered to be able to tell someone that you don't want to take part in that type of activity even if you're around them.
So with just being in that tier 2 program, it helped me to be able to tell certain people I don't want to do this or this isn't for me anymore.
>> Right? And see that second part doesn't have anything to do with strong will.
Right.
>> No, >> that has to do with you making a decision that there's something better in your life that you want to do other than do uh substances which winds you up where >> right?
I mean that's that's really the case, you know. Um and it also winds you up that you do things that probably normally wouldn't do if you weren't under the influence, right?
>> Yes. So let's talk a little bit about the DV program. So what did you learn in the program that you can apply uh outside?
You always have a choice and you should always walk away from domestic situation. No matter if it's emotional, physical, mental, financial, whatever it is, you always have that option to say no and walk away.
I >> think it's always about walking away.
>> Um, yes. I know that in certain situations it's hard to walk away. Even if you're sometimes in love with that person or you feel like you are you or you feel like you are in love with that person, it becomes very hard to walk away. But sometimes it's for the betterment of yourself to walk away from them situations knowing that you can end up in jail or sometimes worse.
>> Okay. You have the power. You have the power to deescalate something.
>> Sometimes you have the power to do that, >> but sometimes you don't. Sometimes situations go out of your control, but you still have to be the bigger person to want to walk away.
>> So, the walking away part is is a big part, but when you walk away, does that make the problem go away?
>> No, it doesn't.
>> Right.
So, it's about understanding where you are, right?
>> Yes.
>> And and you're right in terms of your problems in the past, you don't want to engage in in a uh creating a violation or in any kind of altercation or anything like that, right?
>> Yes.
So that's where the walking away comes in part. Even though it doesn't solve the issue, but for that time being, it gets me out of that predicament.
You think anybody ever wakes up in the morning and says, "I got it. I got it out for Mr. Dash."
>> Most likely not.
>> Right. So that's a good mindset, right?
>> Yes. Whatever we face during the day, if we face it, you know, it's not about me, it's about whatever the situation is.
>> Yes.
>> Right.
Um, so that's important. And, um, you know, you you have a flat sentence.
Um, and there's the opportunity. You took DV inside, there's a program on the outside, uh, that can help you even get additional skills.
um in dealing with things, right?
>> Okay.
>> So, it's making that commitment, you know, making that commitment to continue to do that, right?
>> Um you have uh an opportunity to uh sponsor your mom's house in Norwalk.
>> Yes.
>> And um you got a line on employment with the holiday end.
>> Yes.
>> Okay. Good. And you haven't had any DRS while you've been in, right?
>> No.
>> Okay.
Um, so, and you know, the other piece that I just wanted to say is, you know, um, I'm sorry about your uh I'm sorry about your cousin.
>> Thank you. you know, and if you put people in your life, uh, you know, recovery related people, church related people, right? When something like that happens, hopefully it never happens again in your life, but something on a scale of something like that, you have somebody to turn to and deal with it rather than to do the wrong thing, right?
>> Yes.
>> That's that's what you should really should really uh put your mind around.
So I don't have um anything further.
Madam Chair, >> thank you Mr. Paul. You ask all the right questions. Miss Turner, >> I have no questions.
>> Okay. So Mr. Dash, we're we're done answering questions. Actually, how long have you been in the PEL program?
>> I've been in the PEL program for about I want to say a year now.
>> Okay. All right. Doing that program, going to school while you're doing all those programs and working. Yes.
>> So, I bring that up because I want you to remember when you're in the community and things start to seem overw overwhelming, all that you were able to juggle at the same time, you know, it's just a matter of putting your mind to it and kind of figuring out how to organize it all.
>> Yes.
>> Yeah. Did good job. All right, Mr. Paul.
>> Um, thank you, Madam Chair. So, uh, Mr. Dash has done a good job while he's been in he his overall rating in terms of risk is high. However, he has done uh several things to uh mitigate that. Uh he has uh gone through the tier 2 program uh and the domestic violence program. uh he's gone through inside out and you know a big one for me is and thank you for clarifying the time on that he uh he's been in the second chance PEL program with Quinnipak University uh for the last year uh he's got a good uh sponsorship with his uh mother and um has employment uh lined up so I would certainly support his role today. Um I I know that he needs to do the domestic violence in the community program. Um and the uh there's a victim and there's a UF turner. I am willing to grant Mr. Dash for that purposes supervision and guidance as he serves his goals and reintegrates.
I would agree. Um if Mr. Dash has shown some growth while he's been incarcerated as I he's juggled a lot of programming and managed to remain disciplinary free.
So despite um being a high risk I believe that as Mr. Cole pointed out the programs have mitigated some of that risk seems to have a good plan for his release. So in a matter of Deja dash inmate 410792, I make a motion to grant parole on or after July 13, 2024 with the following stipulations. Community based treatment for domestic violence, no contact with the victim, DS, and no and a general no contact with your original codefendant, Francis Mangate.
Anything else in terms of stipulations?
>> You had no driving.
>> I did not have no driving.
>> Yeah.
>> No driving without the parole officer's permission. Do I have a second? All those in favor? All right. Right, Mr. Dash, good luck to you.
>> Thank you.
>> Now, after seeing hundreds of Connecticut parole hearings, I would say that it's hard not to feel happy for him. He was respectful. He took his programs. Yes, he has a long arrest record with maybe dozens of arrests, convictions, failure to appears, but I think we can put that all aside. As Dr. Grande says, "If there is one thing for certain, it's that we would never see Mr. Dash again."
>> Good morning, Mr. Dash.
>> And 15 months, he lasted 15 months, which to be frank is pretty impressive.
We we often see revocations where they where they last even just days, and I think we've seen a few where they last just a few hours. And here it was. He just wasn't taking programs. It seems that he absconded for a little bit, but you'll be surprised his PO shows up and you know, of course, our prince over here gets an attorney spade paid for by the state and these attorneys, they're they're impressive. So, they're going to fight for his case. But the PO actually will take his side, which is quite interesting. But I just want to again say this is I'm just prefacing this hearing. We're still just in the very beginning of this young man's adventure.
So make sure you stick around for the entire process. Okay, let's jump in.
>> We now will review the charges of the state year officer bringing and see and the information underlying each charge.
Bill height starting with charge one program participation.
>> You referred to attend the explore program behavioral management program for violence on 5224.
You failed to attend program verified a valid excuse for not attending on 7324, 71024, 71724, 82124 and were subsequently unsuccessfully discharged 82824.
You were again referred to attend the explore program behavioral management program for domestic violence on 32025.
you failed to attend the explore program or provide a valid excuse for not attending on 51325, 7125, 71525, 7225 and were again unsuccessfully discharged on 7225 >> in charge to program management program or behavior management program >> on 82824. You're unsuccessfully discharged from the behavioral management for domestic violence for the first time for violating the program's attendance rules. On 7225, you're unsuccessfully discharged from the behavioral management program for domestic violence for the second time for violating the program's attendance rules.
>> The state has filed the following exhibits starting with exhibit A.
>> Exhibit A, Connecticut conditions of parole. Exhibit B, remand actual custody order. Exhibit C, notice of parole violation parole rights. Exhibit D, providation report. Exhibit E, explore discharge report 9424.
Exhibit F, explore discharge report 72325.
Exhibit G, offender misconduct report 71524. Exhibit H, offender misconduct report 12925.
>> I also ex um the GPS agreement exhibit I that was provided in the evidence.
>> Correct.
Did you receive the notice of parole violation, parole violation report, and other documents that were marked for identification purposes?
>> Yes.
>> Defense has also filed exhibit one, parole accomplishments, and future plans for reinstatement. Today, we have no witnesses. At this time, the state will have an opportunity to present evidence to speak to any of that evidence submitted. Officer, >> um, no, I just wanted to uh speak on the charges a little bit more. Um, so Dash was given several chance to complete um the domestic violence program. He was given several warnings the first time that if he didn't um attend he would be ancestally discharged. He was re-referred. He was given several warnings that if he failed again he would be remanded. That's why we're here today. Um I understand that he did have some health issues. However, he never um produced paperwork for all the groups he missed uh with the Bridgeport Explorer program. even after he missed those groups, continued to miss more groups leading to his unsuccessful discharge.
And um going further than that, I understand that um due to everything they went through with Mr. Dash in the Bridgeport location, they no longer excuse absences for anybody at that program um just because it was uh such an unusual circumstance of somebody missing so many groups um based off one referral. U that that's all I want to say on the charges.
>> Thank you, Council.
>> Yes. Good morning, Pio. Hey, Ju just a couple questions. You beat me to it.
You're aware he did have some health issues, correct? He will.
>> Yes.
>> Yeah. Okay. And we're not disputing that there was some difficulties with these classes. Um, he was under supervision according to the documents you submit for approximately 15 months or so.
>> Yes.
>> Okay. And this is his first violation according to the documents.
>> Yes.
>> Okay. Did you reach out to Mr. dash on or about July 30th to advise him that he was being remanded and he needed to turn himself in.
>> Oh yeah. No, and we'll we'll speak of that when we come to the charge if that absolutely happened. Yeah. Yep.
>> Okay. I I you'll speak to I'm asking you now. Did Did you reach out to him at some point?
>> Um I mean he reached out to me or I reached out to him. We spoke. Um Okay.
That Yes. Yes.
>> All right. He was advised that he was being remanded by you. Correct.
>> Correct.
>> Okay. And he did follow up I believe on July 31st he did turn himself in.
>> Yes.
>> Okay. Do you recall if you recall I know it's a few months back. Do you recall Mr. Dash indicating to you that I want to go see my son. Can you give me until 2 p.m. and then I'll turn myself in. Do you if you recall that conversation with Mr. Dash? Yeah. Yes.
>> Okay. Okay. Um, Mr. Dash, regarding the issues with the July, I believe you started the classes, they were virtually.
>> That was when I first was released.
>> Okay. And was there any difficulties with the online classes?
>> Yes, there was. I sent emails >> along with screenshots of me not being able to log in.
>> Okay. And eventually you were put to in-person classes. Correct.
>> Yes.
>> Okay. And once again, Mr. Dash, we're not disputing what your parole officer submitted. There was difficulty with you attending classes. We're conc.
>> All right. And could you I know your parole officer knows, but I don't think the hearing examiner knows.
Approximately when did you start having some health issues? I believe it was to the type of virus or something that you got from your mom, I believe. Correct.
>> Yes. I got that I got that at the end of probably like the middle or end of June.
I caught a virus, a real bad virus from my mother. Um Okay. We were both in and out of the hospital.
>> All right. Were you put on any type of medication for that virus?
>> Yes, I'm still I just stopped taking my medicine for the virus in DOC. Okay.
When when did you stop it?
>> August 12th.
I don't have anything else to add once I just want to make it clear. I I not disputing what PO I submitted. And the other thing I want I'll mention again your recommendation PO you had recommended approximately 60day sanction. Correct.
>> I mean I prefer to talk about the recommendation when we get to the recommendation part of the hearing. I mean that's that's where that I will speak on that. That that is true and I was going to highlight that later on the hearing. Yeah. Absolutely. Okay. That's fine. Y >> I don't have any. I just wanted to give you a little background. Once again, we're not disputing what was submitted.
Just give a little background um regarding that. And just one more question, Mr. Dash, regarding uh one of the pro did you ever reach out to the um I believe it was a female um at the program. Did you ever call her or email her that you were having some difficulties if you recall?
>> Yes.
>> What was her name? Do you remember her?
Yolanda.
Yeah. Start it was the why. Started with a Y.
>> Okay. And and you made some attempts to contact her regarding the difficulties you were having.
>> Yes.
>> Okay. I I don't have any other questions. I just it's just kind of self uh explain self-explanatory what was submitted here.
>> Thank you. Anything further?
>> No, nothing further.
>> Good. Thank you. I'm also take a moment before I announce my findings regarding charge one program participation. I make a finding based on testimony as well as states exhibits A D through H. And on charge 2 domestic violence, I make a finding based on testimony as well as states exhibits A D and through H. That concludes the factf finding portion of this hearing. Before I make my recommendation, your attorney as well as the state will have an opportunity to speak to your background and history.
So, Dash uh like his attorney said, uh we, you know, we made contact around July 30th. Um Dash actually became aware he was probably himself he was uh going to be remanded. That's because of the conversation we had earlier. If he was to fail explorer again, he would probably be remanded. Um you know, I did something I don't usually do. Um I told him, "Come on in, turn yourself in, and uh you know, we'll take care of this."
My recommendation will say 60 days. And uh Dash held up his word. He turned himself in. He asked for um the morning to spend with his son. He did turn himself in like he said that afternoon.
And uh he saved us from having to go out and look for him. Um anytime we have to go do an attempt to locate in the community, we're putting parole officers in danger. That didn't happen. Um he saved his family from having to go through the stress of having to search the house. He saved the victim in his previous case from notifications saying Mr. Dash is now on the run. He saved a warrant from going to the fugitive unit.
He he did what he had to do. So I don't think he needs to do any more time than the 60 days we agreed on. Um this um revocation hearing actually moved a lot quicker than I thought it would be. He's already done 30 out of the 60 days. Uh so if there's a board review in the next week or two, I'm okay with him being reproved after that date. Um, I would just say, you know, if there's another instance of him failing the domestic violence program where we go into another violation immediately and uh that um stipulation should stay on his pole agreement that he needs to do the um domestic violence program and uh complete at this time.
>> That's all.
>> Thank you. Thank you.
>> I I appreciate your comments and I'm going to be frank with you for someone who was out in the community for 15 months with your recommendation is very reasonable. I wish I could get more reasonable recommend. So, I I appreciate you saying that and putting those comments regarding my client because I was going to put that he did keep his word, but you already beat me to it. So, we we don't need to repeat that. Just little background on Mr. Dash. I indicated he been out in the community 15 months. Yes, there were some difficulties. I did speak to him obviously um on a couple occasions. He realizes that is a stipul it's got to be done otherwise he's going to get remanded again. And he is willing to do it as he indicated. He just came off his medication, so there are no more health um issue u excuses not to do these classes. He realizes he needs to do them. He's 29 years old. He does have a son um as indicated by his parole officer on his previous release. He was sponsored by his uh mother, Miss Dash, in Norwok and he was there until he was remanded. He indicated to us in 2024 while incarcerated. He did begin studying business management um and also had a part-time job. He indicated at TMS landscaping out of Norwok. He did um begin to attend some of the classes. He was removed for unexcused absences, but he did attend some of the sessions. He did not completely blow off of the program, but unfortunately, he did not get to the uh to the endline there. Um he did have regular contact with his parole officer. It looks like in May of 2024, he did um he was placed on GPS monitoring. He's already indicated this is his first violation. Upon his uh reinstatement, he'd like to be sponsored um by his fiance, provided you with her address and phone number, and I tell all my clients the field parole officer, it's not me that's in charge of that.
All that would need to be vetted by PCS.
Um and he also indicated, I believe, he put his mother down um as a second choice. He is considering return back to school for business management and he's also indicated to us he is eligible to return to the last position in Norwok and he's immuneable to all treatment recommendation. Now I praise Pate regarding his recommendation. I'm just going to make one ask for one thing. His son's birthday is on September 20th. I am I never asked for because I know the board has a final say if you would consider a reparole date of a day prior to his son's birthday. I know it's about 10 11 days shorter than his parole recommendation and I typically don't ask that but I did speak to Mr. Dash to indicate it. He did ask to see his son prior to him turning himself in. He's been in since um July 31st. That's my only request I have on Mr. Dash's uh behalf. I know it's not the full 60 days, but it's pretty close. I don't have any other comments.
>> Thank you, P. Height. Anything further?
>> No. And I have no objection to that either. That's fine.
>> Thank you. Want to take a moment before I announce my recommendation?
>> Hey, Mr. Dash, I see that you were uh released for parole in July of 2024. you were in the community for a little over a year. Within that time frame, it appears that the the domestic violence uh program was really what led to this remand. It doesn't sound like there was any further issues reported by your parole officer. Um taking into account that this is your first violation. Um what was said here on record today, I recommend revoke and repole on 911 2025, which is an approximate six week sanction with the following conditions.
domestic violence, no contact with victim DS, a general no contact with FM, and no operation of a motor vehicle without the express permission of your pole officer. My findings of recommendations forwarded to the board, and your board of view is scheduled on 911, 2025, next Thursday, which is also the same day that I recommend rep your repro, but the board has the final say.
So, they can adopt that recommendation or they can exceed that recommendation.
And if if they choose to exceed that recommendation, then another hearing will take place for them to justify why they would want to seek additional confinement.
>> If if I may, I appreciate once again Pay objecting to my request. I just need to clarify one thing. Unfortunately, I'm showing discretionary parole. So, Mr. D, it great. the parole officer didn't object to my recommendation and the parent examiner gave you 911, you are on discretionary parole. Unfortunately, discretionary parole means your release date is on or after date. Even if the board adopts the recommendation on September 11th, which is the next board review date, you might not be released on September 11th. If you're on special parole, they have to release you that day. So, we do have a little bit of a window if they to get you out prior to 9:20. But unfortunately, discretionary parole is on or after date.
I just want to make sure we're we get calls the next day. Why didn't I get released even though the board adopted it? It's because the discretionary parole situation.
>> Okay.
>> Okay. I just want to make sure you understand that.
>> Yes, I understand.
>> All right. All right. Good luck to you.
Thank you again, P. Hey.
>> Thank you very much.
>> Thank you.
>> Yep. You're welcome.
>> And Grace by the parole interviewer.
Grace by his PO. And sure enough, the parole board said, "Yes, this is a good choice. We will send our young man back into the street." You know what I feel like saying? I understand that all he had to do was take a DV program online, but like he said, he his credentials weren't working. He couldn't log in, and surely that shouldn't be his fault. But I think if there is one thing for certain, it's that he will take his DV program and that we will never see Mr. Dash again.
>> Morning, Mr. Dash.
Come on.
>> Gosh darn it, Mr. Dash. Not again. And yes, ladies and gentlemen, Mandalorian, he lasted about a month, maybe less. And guess what he did again? He didn't take his DB program. You just can't make this stuff up. For anybody who's wearing the beer goggles, the mic pull goggles, and they say, "Oh, you know, these poor B angel Aladdin, it's too every everything. All he had to do was take the program, you know, you just you just can't feel bad for him anymore. You just can't. I want Oh, you know, the guy, you don't understand. He's just He's just It's really difficult to take an online program." Okay. Anyways, he's going to get his attorney again and let's see if the PO doesn't take it so easy on him this time.
>> So, we will now review the charges that the state your parole officer is bringing against you and the information underlying each charge. Officer, hey, can you please review the charges that you brought against Mr. Dash?
>> Charge one, reporting. On 10225, you failed to report as directed to your assigned parole officer at the New York Police Department at 10 a.m. Charge number two, program participation. On 10 925 and 11425, you failed to attend your intake appointment for the explore domestic violence program, a behavioral management program for domestic violence. Charge three, residence. On 10225, you failed to reside at your pearl approved residence without permission from your parole officer.
Charge four, behavioral management program. On 10925 and 11425, you failed to attend your intake appointment for the explored domestic violence program, a behavioral management program for domestic violence. And charge number five, no driving. on 11325. You operated a motor vehicle without permission from your parole officer.
>> Thank you. And you've also submitted evidence in support of the charges. Can you please review the evidence that you submitted for us?
>> Exhibit A, Connecticut conditions of parole. Exhibit B, remand to actual custody order. Exhibit C, notice pro violation ply rights. Exhibit D, provolation report. Exhibit E, BOP, revocation hearing summary 9225. Exhibit F, explore domestic violence program referral 9225.
Exhibit G, case management plan and goal sheet sign 10725. Exhibit H, offender miscount report sign 10325. Exhibit I, offender misconduct report sign 10725.
Exhibit J, email correspondence from community resources for justice. These are exhibits J through M. They're dated 10625, 102725, 11725, 111025. All under the same header. Exhibit N, text message correspondence with 2036731123 10925 through 111325.
Exhibit O, photograph of Copper Honda Odyssey, Connecticut reg BB 49298 taken 11325. And exhibit P, photograph of notice of parking violation date 11325 at 11:06 a.m.
>> Thank you. I do just want to know on the record I have exhibit I um I know you sign said sign seven 107, sorry. I have it signed 10:15. Um, so I'm just going to make that adjustment to it. Um, assuming that's the correct document.
Um, >> let me check the evidence here just to make sure. Um, >> the one I received is says 10:15.
>> You're probably right. I'm going to double check that. Uh, >> yes, 10:15. Thank you.
>> Yes. I'm just going to update the date um for purposes the future. Um, so council, did you and your client receive the notice of pro violation, a pro violation for all the other documents identified for today? Yes, we have. I have not received my exhibit from the defense. Do you need any time to submit any evidence?
We do not. Thank you. Um, and we do not have any witnesses today. So, at this time, the state will have an opportunity to make a short statement, call any witnesses, and testify with respect to probable cause and the severity of the allegations. So officer hate would you like to make any statements towards charges and the severity of the allegations?
>> I mean the biggest charge that brought us here was the uh failure to complete the intake appointment for his domestic violence program. He was given um two chances complete that intake appointment and several reminders um on both instances. Uh he gave a reason for missing it the first time. um he didn't really give a coherent reason for missing it the second time. Um but he was informed the whole way that we'd be here today a pro violation if he did not um complete those intake appointments uh which he did not. Um as far as the charge of residence goes, um he was not residing at his place for uh quite some time when we caught on to that. I'm not sure why he thought that would be okay.
Uh but I charged that behavior just on um 10225 because that was the day he uh failed to report and indicated that he did not have a ride to Norwok um to report which is where he should have been residing anyways. So um I just want to point that out as well. Uh the other charges I really have nothing else to add to them. Um they're pretty self-explanatory.
>> Thank you council.
>> Yes, thank you very much. Um, as to the reporting charge, I just want to kind of explain the background here. My client reports he was released from custody on September 19th of this year and right away went to the police um station, which is, I believe, where the parole office was located to check in and um his PO was not there that day. Another PO was there and was covering the case for him. So, that PO helped my client sign all of the paperwork, but I just wanted to ask him a couple questions related to this. Um, Mr. Dash, can you tell the hearing examiner whether or not the covering PO on September 19th gave you PO H's contact info with his information?
>> No, she did not.
>> Okay. Thank you very much. So, I will just note that um he has maintained that he didn't have um the PO's direct contact info. And so, Mr. Dash, when you were told about that October 2nd date, did you try getting in touch with your PO thereafter to let him know that there was an issue with that date?
>> Yes, I did. I left him a message on his answering machine. He told me that that is not that is not his job to check that answering machine. I am supposed to call his cell phone. How am I supposed to do that if I'm just getting home from prison?
>> Okay. Thank you very much. And then can you also just um indicate um you know what did your PO tell you about that scheduled session on that date?
>> He told me that I was supposed to report to him on that date. But again, you're telling me that I'm supposed to report to you. I'm telling you I'm calling you.
I'm calling the police station. I'm calling I'm calling Rich parole. I'm leaving voice messages for you. saw that you told me that it was my responsibility to get in contact with you. You're my parole officer >> and Mr. >> Sorry. And Mr. Dash, you um so it was October 2nd they wanted you to report and you had a conflict on that date.
What was the date that you wanted to report on instead?
>> The third the next day.
>> Okay. Thank you very much. Um so I would just note that for the record um the comments that my client just made. Um, and then as to program participation, Mr. Dash, can you explain the situation with the Explore program that happened on October the 9th where you I believe were running late?
>> Yes. I was I woke up late. I was running late. I called her and I told her I was about 10 to 15 minutes behind schedule.
She told me not to even come because if I'm 15 minutes 10 to 15 minutes late, they can't take me. I would have to reschedle again. I don't know what y'all want me to do. If I'm taking public transportation, y'all don't want me to drive. I can't control a bus and a train being late.
>> Thank you. And then concerning the situation of the November 4th report date, I know that you aren't disputing that your PO had told you to report that date, but can you just explain kind of what you had going on and why you didn't report on that that November the 4th date?
>> November 4th. Um I believe this was this was the date I believe when you had um explore program scheduled but then maybe also had something that initially had conflicted with that.
>> Yes. Um at the time this was also when this was also it also coincides with him saying my residence me not staying at my residence.
Um, there was supposed to be a change of address going on at the time with my fiance. I was supposed to be changing addresses to my fiance at the time. Um, we ended up not doing that and a whole bunch of things happened with her mental health. So, on the 4th, she ended up going into a mental health crisis and she had to be taken to the hospital to be checked in. And I could not I could not get there at all. I was trying to get back. I was trying to get to Bridgeport and I could not make it.
>> Okay. Thank you very much. I appreciate you putting that on the record. Um and then just a couple other brief things. I would note as to residents, my client reports again those allegations weren't accurate. He reports that um his PO had gone to the residence um seen his mother there. He states that at no point did his mom indicate that he like was no longer residing there. Um, he indicated the mom hadn't seen him. But I will note that he states his mom works two jobs and it was, you know, a situation where they were kind of like two ships in the night. One would come home, the other would leave and they didn't really see each other often. Um, so I just wanted to note that my client also reports that he was sometimes out of the house, you know, later. However, I don't believe that any evidence has been submitted to show that he was on any sort of GPS bracelet or any sort of curfew um indicating that he needed to be in his residence during specific hours. Um and then lastly, um I think that the um charge four has been addressed um along with charge two. But then as to charge five, I would just argue for this one that the PC standard, the probable cost standard has not been met. I would just argue the ticket and the photos alone don't establish that my client was actually the one operating. So, I would argue that the evidence is insufficient um for that charge. Um and then lastly, I would just argue these allegations are not serious enough to warrant revoking my client's parole. Thank you.
>> Thank you.
>> So, uh the attorney stated that um when Mr. Dash was released, uh he first reported to the New Rock Police Department. Um that is not the case. The day he was released, he reported to the Bridgeport District Parole Office.
That's where all our um new offenders are reporting to the first day they are released from incarceration. Um and he saw the officer of the day that day because I was conducting reporting down in Norwok. Um he stated that the officer of the day did not tell him when he was supposed to report. I'm just looking for that case no interaction that was entered here. That will indicate Mr. Dash. We get to reply in just a minute. Let um Mr. Kate finish and then we'll reply in just a second. Thank you.
Okay.
All right. So, uh, on September 19th, 2025, the officer of the day entered case zone interaction that the subject reported to BDO, which is the Bridgeport District Office as instructed, his conditions were signed and his DV program to be completed was emphasized.
He stated he would like to complete the DV DV program in Bridgeport. He was instructed to report to Phat on October 2nd at 10 a.m.
>> Anything further? Um officer?
>> Uh no, just speaking of that charge.
That's it. Thank you.
>> Okay. Thank you, councel.
>> Yeah, I would just um clarify for the record that was my misstatement. I um I was I was confused concerning the two charges, but yes, he did report. I just was trying to get out there. He reported to somebody on night. Um the location, I apologize for my misstatement, but um he did report and saw a PO. Again, it wasn't his PO. It was who was covering that day. Um but I just want to note he was giving, you know, I don't think my client at any point is contesting that he was given those instructions. He is just stating that he had a conflict with those, you know, that specific date and was trying to take it upon himself to do the right thing, contact parole, get in touch with them to explain the conflict and try and offer an alternative reporting date. Um, so that's what I was trying to get on the record there. Um, that is it though as far as um the clarification. Mr. Dash, did you have anything else you wanted to say for the record or did that clear it up?
uh a little bit, but also is the fact that he you made me sign a misconduct report for that day stating that the officer of the day gave me your contact information and then tried to tell me that there's video. So where's the video? Because she didn't give me your contact information and then you tried to blatantly yell at me and tell me that I should have your contact information.
How have you sent me to prison? I no longer have the same phone. I no longer have none of that same stuff. Everything I have now is brand new.
Thank you.
Anything additional from either side at this point before I take a moment?
>> Uh, no, nothing additional other than the officer of the day maintains that she gave uh, Mr. Dash my business card with importing instructions written on the back that I had left at the district office for receive the day he was released.
>> Yeah, >> I just argue that there is some evidence submitted as to that, but nothing further from defense. Thank you. Thank you.
Then I can announce my findings. Um, Mr. D. So on charge number one, the condition of reporting, I am making a find of probable cause based on states exhibits A, D, and H. On charge number two, the condition of program participation. I'm also making a finding of probable cause based on states exhibits A, D, F, I, J, K, L, and N. On charge number three, the condition of residence. I'm making a finding of probable cause based on states exhibits A, D, and H. On charge number four, I'm making a finding probable cause based on states exhibits um for sorry, for the condition of behavioral management program based on states exhibits A, D, F, J, K, L, and F. Charge number five, a condition of no driving. I'm making a note finding a probable cause based on the information reviewed. The state failed to submit sufficient evidence in support of the charge and the elements were not met. Um, with that, Mr. Dash, I'm also finding that the XR serious enough to warrant revocation and I've also determined that you should be detained while you await your revocation hearing. So, the records office at the facility will be notified of this. Your officer is now aware of it. What happens next is that your revocation hearing will be scheduled within 60 business days of your remand to custody. At that hearing, myself or another hearing examiner will um determine if you violated the conditions of your pearl and if so, they will make a recommendation regarding whether your pearl should be revoked and what if any sanctions should be imposed. So, that does conclude today's preliminary hearing. Any questions?
>> Um, no. Taisha, I will set up a call with you at the facility so that we can discuss everything and prep for the second hearing that we're going to have coming up. Okay.
>> All right. Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you, Officer H. This concludes the hearing from number 4109792.
Thank you. Have a great day.
Thank you.
>> Now, >> good morning.
>> Do you know who you want first?
Oh, why can't I hear anything?
>> No, it's because I'm muted. Because I just sit here and I just talk and talk and I'm muted. Um, sorry about that.
They're all here. So, one.
>> Yeah, we'll start with Mr. Dash.
>> All right. So, Dash, >> thank you.
>> You're welcome.
>> All right. So, I think they're all the same person.
>> Thank you.
>> You're welcome.
>> Good morning, Mr. Dash. How are you?
>> Good morning. I'm doing good. How are you doing today?
>> Good. So, it is 10:44, so we can't start for a minute, but I just want to check in. There we go. And make sure Officer Kate's with us. Perfect. So, we'll get started in about one minute. Okay.
So, I do want to before we start though, make it note on the record. Um, charge number five, the conditional no driving was there was a no finding found at that pre um at the preliminary hearing and we have not received any new evidence submitted by Pearl and Community Services. So that charge will not be taken into consideration at today's hearing. Um, so officer, hey, can you please review the charges for us?
Starting with charge number one, the condition of reporting.
>> On 10225, you failed to report as directed to your assigned parole officer at the Newark Police Department at 10:00 a.m. Charge two, program participation.
On 10 925 and 11425, you failed to attend your intake appointment for the Explore Domestic Violence Program, a behavioral management program for domestic violence. Charge three residents. On 10225, you failed to reside at your pole approved residence without permission from your pearl officer. Charge four, behavior management program. On 10925 and 11425, you failed to attend your intake appointment for the explore domestic violence program, a behavioral management program for domestic violence.
>> Thank you. And all the evidence submitted was identified at the preliminary hearing and that all does remain the same. Um, we did receive an exhibit from the defense of exhibit one elicit pro accomplishments and future snipes in statement. Council, do you need time to submit any other evidence?
>> Not at this time.
>> Um, so we don't have any witnesses. So at this time opportunity um to call any witnesses, present evidence, and speak to any of the evidence submitted. So officer hate, would you like to make any statements towards the charges at this time?
>> Yes.
So, um, going with, uh, charge one reporting, um, just wanted to repeat that in the preliminary hearing, uh, you know, I gave testimony that there was a note in case notes from officer of the day who Dash actually saw that, uh, directed him to report to me on 10225 at the North Police Department. Um, that was a date that I had written down on business card for Mr. Dash. And the only reason that's officer today would have knowledge of that date is if they saw the date that I left for Dash and that um he received it. So um as far as charge two program partition participation goes, he was given two opportunities. Um my meeting's actually coming back up right now. I might be able to join on the video. One second.
>> Okay.
All right, we'll tell I'll just keep talking this way for now. Um, he was given two opportunities to clean an intake appointment. Um, and it just displayed a pattern of not properly. I'm sorry. Now I hear myself on my computer.
Hold on.
>> Oh jeez. Okay, no problem. Yeah, hang up if you feel like it's good on the other side. Whatever working >> again. Just star six to unmute.
Perfect.
>> Okay. Can you hear me?
>> Yeah, definitely.
>> Okay. All right. Charge number four, behavior management program, um, is just a repeat of, uh, charge number two. So, no more, uh, testimony on that. Um, that's all I have to say as far as the charges go.
>> Thank you. And councel, >> yes. Um, as to the reporting charge, I would again argue that there should be a no finding as to that. Um, because this was not a willful failure to report. My client had previously testified at the preliminary hearing that he was released from custody and went that same day to check in with parole. Um, and his assigned PO, as we heard, was not there.
And the covering PO with um my client's testimony was that he did not provide him with the correct contact information for his assigned PO. Um, my client isn't contending that he didn't receive the reporting instruction for the seventh.
rather he's, you know, arguing that he had a conflict and had tried his best to reach out to his PO to report that and ask if he could come report the prior day. My client um had previously testified that he had called the parole office multiple times and left many voicemails trying to get um his PO either on the phone or just let him know that he wouldn't be able to make that reporting session on October 2nd and had asked if he could come in on a different date. Um, I will say in the narrative it indicates that that voicemail was in fact received. Um, so I would just note that, you know, I don't think that this was a willful failure to appear and my client did um contact parole to apprise them of the fact that um that he did have a conflict with that date.
Additionally, I will just note after that date um my client reported without issue on the date that he was brought into custody. That was a um standard reporting date. So, uh, I will just, you know, make those arguments, renew the testimony from the preliminary hearing, and, you know, for those reasons argue there should be a no filing on that first charge. As to charges two and four concerning the explore program, I would again just incorporate the testimony and comments placed on the record at the preliminary hearing as to those two charges. And then lastly, as to the third charge residence, I would argue that there should be a no finding based on the arguments and testimony that were put on the record of the preliminary hearing. Additionally, I would argue that the elements for that charge have not been met. I would argue that there has not been evidence submitted to show that my client no longer intended to live at that residence with his mother.
I would argue no evidence has been submitted to show that my client was absent forever that residence for a lengthy period of time or that he moved his belongings out of that residence or had indicated to others that he was moving out of that residence. In fact, he was um after the date being alleged um visited at that residence and he was there. So, I would just argue that um for those reasons, there should be a no finding. Um the charge does not meet the elements. Um and those are my comments as to the charges and I would at the appropriate time like to speak to my client's background history. Thank you.
>> Thank you. Um officer, hey, any additional comments at this time?
>> Uh nothing else at this time.
>> Okay. Thank you. I'll just take a moment and then I'm going to announce my findings.
>> All right. So on charge number one, Mr. Dash, I am finding that you violated the condition of reporting based on the evidence submitted at states exhibits A, D, and H. On charge number two and finding you violated the condition of program participation based on the evidence submitted in states exhibits A, D, F, I, J, K, L, and N. Um, I am making a finding that you violated the condition of residence based on the evidence presented at states exhibits A, D, and H. For charge number four, I'm finding you violated the condition of behavioral management program based on the evidence presented in states exhibits A, D, F, I, J, K, L, E, and N.
Um, so that does conclude the factf finding portion of this hearing. Before I make my recommendation, the state will have an opportunity to speak to your background and history. After the state is finished, you will have the same opportunity. The purpose of this part of the revocation hearing is to help determine what I recommend. Um, so officer hate, would you like to make any comments or statements towards Mr. Dash's background and or history?
>> Yes. Uh, Dash was on parole for one year and two months. Um, then he was violated for failing to complete domestic violence program. He was discharged on from it several times. Then two months later, uh he was given another chance to come back out on parole supervision. Uh was re-referred to that program and then he was discharged from it for missing two intake appointments back to back. He was given the information when he came back out that he needed to take this program and we'd be uh going through an immediate second parole violation. Uh that is what happened and that's why we are here today. During the first parole violation that he had, I was extremely lenient. I kind of said, "Look, go ahead and state that there was a violation, put Dash back out on parole supervision.
I wasn't sticking to any specific time limit for him to be reincarcerated. I just uh wanted to substantiate it was a violation in case it disappeared again.
Uh, which it did. So, here we are with a second parole violation for the exact same reason. um plus a couple other charges for not reporting uh not residing at his residence and I think those are the only ones I'm allowed to speak on today.
Um I want to go to the uh exhibits that uh Mr. Dash's uh council had submitted. Uh number one um you know he describes himself as presently being the man of the house at his sponsor's residence. Um yet his sponsor couldn't really give a clear answer as to when he stays there, how often he's there, states that there are two ships passing in the night. Um I don't really think he is doing as much as he states he is for his family in Norwok.
Going down to employment, he listed two past employers. I have never seen a payub for Mr. Dash while he was on parole supervision.
He listed his participation in Explore as a an accomplishment. However, he has violated his parole for failing that program twice. So, I don't know how that can really be considered any sort of accomplishment. Um, that's all I have to say about the evidence they submitted.
Um, as far as the seriousness, I think it's definitely more revocation in the findings we had today. I don't think supervision is really working for Mr. Dash. He has approximately uh 11 months left on supervision. I think that if he serves the rest of his sentence, um that's an appropriate sanction. Uh parole supervision is just not working. He's not following his conditions and he's not following up with treatment recommendations we make.
Um so that's I'm asking for and uh that's all I have to share at this time.
>> Thank you. Um and council, >> yes, thank you very much. Um, my client's 30 years old, born and raised in Norwalk, Connecticut. He does have a strong support system of family, including his mom, his grandmother, and his three sisters, all who reside in Norwok. He also has a three-year-old son who resides in Bridgeport with his mother as well. Um, my client was sponsored by his mom in Norwok previously when on supervision. While incarcerated in 2024, my client started studying business management, which he hopes to continue in the future. Um, we did list the two employment um, places, the TMS and Norwok and Westport Train Cafe. Um, I will just note that my client with the Westport um, was there for just a couple weeks prior to um, the background check coming back um, but he was, I believe, actively searching for work. He previously engaged in the explore program um, while on parole in 2024 and in March of 2025. I understand PO hates comments. However, we um, ask our clients all record of treatment. So, we include any sort of record of treatment here. Um, we're not saying that he finished the program. We're just noting what he was able to accomplish of the program. Um, concerning his um physical health, my client does have um an unfortunate situation going on with um sinus impacts and sinus pressure due to a series of viruses. I know he's very anxious about getting um further testing on that once he's back in the community.
Upon reinstatement of his role, he would like to be sponsored by his mother at the address we provided in Norwok. He eventually would like to utilize a housing assistance program to obtain his independent residence. He wants to get back to school to study business management, as I noted, and is interested in pursuing further education at um community college, either Husatonic or Connecticut State Community College. He's open to utilizing its hip agency for immediate placement and employment and is also open to any treatment recommendations. Um, I am asking you to consider a sanction not to exceed um, three months for my client.
He has been incarcerated since early November of last year. Additionally, he will EOS on his parole later this year, and he can certainly use the assistance of parole to get back on his feet in the community prior to all of that to get um, situated with treatment and different programs to um, move forward.
Um, Mr. Dash, is there anything about, you know, your background or history or your future plans that I didn't say that you would like to include at this time?
>> No, you said no.
>> All right. Thank you very much.
>> Thank you.
>> Any further comments? Um, Officer Hay.
>> No.
Then >> I'll just take a moment, then I'm going to announce my recommendation.
I just want to note some things on the record, Mr. Dash. So, I am concerned also that this is your second violation for the same behavior. Um, and I did listen to the testimony presented today. Um, so with that, I am going to recommend your PO be revoked and that you serve an approximate seven-month period of confinement as a sanction. So that's with a recall date of June 15, 2026. And I'm going to recommend the following conditions. Um, behavioral management program for domestic violence, no contact with victim DS, a general no contact with FM, and no operation of a motor vehicle without full officer's permission. Um, officer Hey, any reason you would want a halfway house placement stipulation added?
>> Uh, no. No, not >> okay. Um, okay. Because that leaves you I think I checked your EOS now is December. Um, so that leaves about six months on on supervision still, Mr. Dash. Um, just be mindful of what you're doing out there because I mean he brought you back after two because of your behavior. So, just this is the third chance. Hopefully, it works. Okay. Um, so what's going to happen next is my recommendation is going to go to the board on February 13th. On that date, the board can do three things. They can lessen my recommendation if they choose to do so.
They can adopt it if they choose to do so. And if for any reason they will want to see a longer period of confinement um as a sanction, they'll bring you back in for a third hearing to address their questions and concerns before anything longer is imposed. Okay. I can set up a legal call with you that day so that I can update you on what the board decides.
>> Okay.
>> And and I do just want to know on the record your end of sentence as of today is December 9th, 2026. Okay. So it does leave you a decent amount of time out in the community on supervision. Okay.
>> Okay.
>> All right. Any questions at this time?
>> No, not at all. Hold on. You said that date was June what?
>> June 15, 2026 is the recommendation.
We'll know for sure on February the 13th.
Okay.
>> Okay. All right. So, thank you all. This does conclude the revocation hearing for um Mr. Dash, inmate number 410792.
All right. Good luck to you, Mr. Dash.
Thank you, Officer B.
>> Thank you, everyone. Have a great day.
Thank you.
>> Good morning. I'm hearing Trell and today is Friday, February 13, 2026.
Members, please state your names for the record.
>> Pan member Barry >> Joy Chance >> Rodriguez. This is the final revocation review for TJA dash and meet number 410792 recommend revoke and repole on June 15th 2026 which is an approximate >> seven sorry seven month sanction with the following conditions behavioral management program for domestic violence no contact of victim TS general contact with and no operation of a motor vehicle without the law's permission. Does this board accept or object this recommendation? Are there any objections?
>> No.
>> And that was it. The decision makers agreed with the interviewer's recommendation and he will be coming back out in June. By the time I'm finally getting to all of these recordings, it is April 21, 2026. Who knows what day will be when you finally watch this, but I will make a prediction that he will not last through uh you know from June to 6 months that he has.
It's pretty funny. It's like so I I I sadly I think we're probably going to see him again, but who knows if we'll go through the revocation process, right? Maybe he'll just say, "Okay, I'm done, guys. Just let me go to EOS." I mean, let's keep in mind the cost. the cost of doing this, right? Having the attorneys that are paid for on his behalf, having everybody show up, having to transport him, having it's like it's all just a big joke. And what did he have to do? He just had to take the Dora Explorer program. Who else thinks Dora the Explorer? Every time you hear it, they call it the Explorer program. It's like, it's like laughable. The whole thing is just a big joke. And he's sitting there all defiant and I, you know, what did I do wrong? It's like, "Bro, just take your anger management program. Like, it it can't be that difficult, man. Just take it."
No parole for Tate. It's just funny. And look at his long and his long record.
Thank you, Sir Richard, for connecting all the dots, for pulling the research.
Remember, Connecticut only shows us sheep pull 10 years of someone's criminal resume. So it starts pretty much when we can see it. I'm surprised we even Oh, this is because we serve pulled this data before 2026 came around. That's why we even have access to the 2015. So robbery second degree, which I imagine was a plea down from robbery first degree because that's what the state of Connecticut does. He got 10 and first degree is pretty violent. You know, it's usually a gun, whatnot. 10 years jail, suspended after 3 years.
So he he owes them seven years with probation five and violation of probation where he gets terminate where it gets terminated. This is in 2021 failure to appear 2021. Here's a 25 2016 carrying a pistol without a permit. Isn't it interesting that you get 25 2016 carrying a pistol without a permit when a year before he has the robbery second degree and you're saying what? How is that possible? How do you get a robbery second degree and and and a year later get carrying a pistol without a permit? How do you have a 10year suspended after three and a year later get a three-year sentence?
What's going on? And you would think I just, you know, we're just morons, but no, it's because the whole thing is a bunch of smoke and mirrors and they just play with they play like everything's skewed. Like I don't really know what happened in this case. Maybe he was out on bond and then he got caught again with carrying a pistol without a permit and they like run these sentences concurrent, but it's all a gimmick, right?
8:16 2021 failure to appear. Second degree 41921, another failure to appear.
427 2021 violation of a protection order. If you can imagine how scary that is. And you did you catch what they said? Well, he turned himself in, so we didn't need to notify the victims. But just this is just a really good record to know when victims come here saying I'm afraid of this person blah blah blah and they say don't worry they're under parole supervision. This is how good parole supervision is. If someone wants to abscond they abscond. If they want to go hunting for more prey they will hunt for more prey. And we've seen it. We have seen sex offenders abscon and disappear for weeks at a time. So don't gaslight us you know parole board by saying it's good that they're under supervision. It's BS. We don't know what they're doing when they cut off the ankle monitor and they disappear for two weeks and then you give them a little two a little sanction.
It's uh it's insane. And you know again his record goes on and on and on and on and on and on and on and um anyways I do think we'll see him again.
I just don't think he has it in him. He doesn't have it in him. He has the mature, you know, the whole thing. It's like, it's like um it's like you're dealing with a child and why would I contact my parole officer? The parole officer should contact me. And it's like, what are you even saying? You're out on parole. And he has reinforcement.
His attorney paid for by the state is standing up to him. and the PO is overworked and underpaid is like trying to fight to and it's just the whole system is geared towards uh towards protecting the offender and the offender, you know, continues to offend.
And with that, I'll let you
Related Videos
BREAKING: Judge Kathleen Issues Emergency Arrest Warrant After Trump Defies Order
Frontora
2K views•2026-05-29
8 Hidden Things About Mackenzie Shirilla Netflix's 'The Crash' Didn't Show You
MarvelousVideos
2K views•2026-05-28
MP Garnett Genuis warns Canada’s MAiD system has ‘gone too far’
WesternStandard
187 views•2026-05-28
THE STREISAND EFFECT AT BARBARA STREISAND’S HOUSE! - First Amendment Audit
KULTNEWS
1K views•2026-05-30
Trump Impeachment STORM IGNITES as 29 Judges Vote for Conviction!!
DanielBriefDaily
2K views•2026-06-02
EBK Jaaybo Won’t Be Going To Trial?! | Criminal Lawyer Reacts
floridadefenseteam
404 views•2026-05-29
OFFICE HOURS: The Theft of Black Brilliance... AI and Intellectual Property (w/ Lisa E. Davis)
marclamonthillnetwork
2K views•2026-05-29
सुप्रीम कोर्ट में 5 जजों का शपथग्रहण समारोह #supremecourt #judges #oathceremony #shorts #ytshorts
Bharat24Liv
4K views•2026-06-02











