Domestication syndrome refers to a set of physical and behavioral traits that emerge when species adapt to living alongside humans, including shorter snouts, lighter fur, floppier ears, and tameness. A 2025 study found that urban raccoons have 3.56% shorter snouts than rural raccoons, suggesting they may be undergoing domestication-like adaptations. Scientists propose that neural crest cells (NCCs), which form early in vertebrate development and help create head structures, may drive these changes by reducing their activity during domestication. However, domestication is a complex process that requires thousands of years of genetic changes, and raccoons are not being actively bred by humans, so this represents only a preliminary step rather than true domestication.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Something Strange Is Happening to RaccoonsAdded:
Raccoons that live near humans do pretty well for themselves.
Just think of all the garbage cans overflowing with leftover pizza, half-eaten fruit, and scraps of pet food!
One group of researchers published a paper in 2025 that suggested that raccoons could be adapting so well to living around us that their little faces may be showing one sign of domestication, in the form of shorter faces.
Now, this story got around, and you may have heard about it in passing from someone getting way too excited about their dreams of having a raccoon as a pet.
And to be clear, raccoons are NOT PETS and they won’t be anytime soon.
Please, I’m begging, please do not cuddle the raccoons But, honestly, city raccoons having stubbier snouts isn’t what’s most scientifically interesting about this research.
See, we don’t even really understand or agree on what domestication even is in the first place.
But studying our neighborhood trash pandas might be one way to find out.
[THEME MUSIC] Alright, I know you may have clicked on this video because it had a thumbnail of a cute raccoon, and you probably want to learn more about them right away.
And I promise we will get there, but to figure out whatever may or may not be going on with these critters, we first have to understand how scientists think about domestication.
They have… a lot of thoughts. And don’t always agree with each other.
Domesticated animals feel like one of those “you know ‘em when you see ‘em” phenomena.
And by “them,” I mean a very fluffy cat meowing at you because she knows that it's time to play with the laser pointer but you're still at your little laptop and talking to people and working on scripts and it's getting late and she wants to play But even though domestic cats are cute and kind of pathetic sometimes, they also add to our lives — they can help keep mice away or be emotional support.
So researchers consider domestication to be a kind of mutualism, which is where two species have a relationship that benefits both of them.
And it’s a little more specific than just living side-by-side.
Domestication is when one species — like humans — increases their own survival and reproduction by somewhat controlling how another species — like housecats — survives and reproduces.
That’s one definition, anyhow.
For our purposes, we can say that humans change domesticated species to suit our needs.
The differences between, say, an African wildcat and a domestic cat come from thousands of years of genetic changes that reinforce our interspecies relationship.
It’s not like raising a lion cub in your home will suddenly flip a biological switch and make it a pet.
When researchers study domestication, they look at way more than just cats and dogs, too.
Hundreds of crop plants, like rice or potatoes, have been domesticated over time.
Farmers control the survival and reproduction of crops, and in return we get a resource out of them: nutritious food.
The wild versions of a lot of these plants barely look like their cultivated cousins!
In any case, the specific evolutionary changes and traits that emerge during the generations-long process of domestication are where biologists really start splitting hairs.
We create scientific definitions based on observations and experiments.
So there’s not always a clear line between domestication and other kinds of interspecies relationships, or even just adaptations to different environments.
A species that’s becoming domesticated over time might change its appearance, its behavior, its nutritional content, or any number of things that makes it more useful to the domesticator species.
This concept of a sort of checklist of traits that domesticated species have in common is called domestication syndrome.
The English naturalist Charles Darwin was a big proponent of the “you know it when you see it” observational sort of biology.
He actually wrote one of the early scientific books that documented patterns in domesticated animals compared to their wild counterparts.
“The Variation of Animals and Plants Under Domestication” was published in 1868.
It was a combination of Darwin’s own thoughts and research being done by his peers.
And even though Darwin didn’t explicitly use the term “domestication syndrome”— that credit goes to botanists in the early 1900s— some of what he documented is still foundational to modern-day studies.
In plants, domestication syndrome could look like changes in fruits, growth patterns, and seed dispersal – you want the seeds to disperse less so you can collect them.
In animals, we’ve noticed things like lighter fur, floppier ears, shorter muzzles, and curlier tails, along with behavioral traits like tameness or differently timed reproductive cycles.
But even though these traits show up across different mammals— like rabbits, dogs, cats, goats, and cows— no domesticated animal has all of them.
When researching the process of domestication and domestication syndrome, some scientists have taken an experimental approach and selectively bred animals to try and make them more domestic across multiple generations, usually focusing on behavior.
People also study domestication in plants.
But we’ll stick with critters for now because, ultimately, we’re here to learn about raccoons, right?
And we’ll get back to trash pandas… right after we keep the lights on with this quick break.
Since you love SciShow, you’ll probably also be into this video’s sponsor: Brilliant.
Brilliant is an online learning platform made for everyone from age 10 to 110.
And they offer courses that strengthen your math skills.
As an example, their math course on Proportional Reasoning is designed to help you understand ratios and proportional relationships.
Over the course of 30 lessons, you’ll get to complete 357 exercises.
Which gives you an idea of just how interactive Brilliant is.
To learn for free on Brilliant for a full 30 days, go to brilliant.org/scishow, scan the QR code onscreen, or click on the link in the description.
Brilliant’s also given our viewers 20% off an annual Premium subscription, which gives you unlimited daily access to everything on Brilliant.
These experimental studies can take place over the course of months or years with fast-breeding animals like mice or rats.
Researchers can compare tamer and more aggressive individuals, make note of differences, and keep breeding the tamer ones to see if they can affect future generations.
The most famous research that took this approach is the Russian Farm-Fox Experiment, which was started by the Russian geneticist Dimitry Belyaev and his collaborators in 1959 and has continued in the decades since— even after his death.
Over 60 years ago, Belyaev got 30 male and 100 female silver foxes from fur farms.
These fur farms had already been breeding foxes in cages for their pelts for decades, so they weren’t exactly wild foxes, but they weren’t necessarily gentle lap-foxes either.
This starting population was chosen based on how friendly they were toward humans.
Belyaev and his team bred them over and over again, and studied the next generations to see if they acted more domesticated and what other traits appeared.
Over the years, these researchers documented similar traits in the ever-tamer foxes, like more white spots in their coats, floppier ears, a more squat and cuter face, and even wagging tails like domestic dogs.
So they concluded that whatever genes affected the calm, pet-like demeanor of these silver foxes also had effects on other developmental processes and biological traits.
And they’re still curious how much more domestic these foxes can get.
The most generous interpretation of this research is that Belyaev and his team figured out a way to condense the long evolutionary process of domestication into a couple decades instead of thousands of years, because of the really close human involvement.
Basically speedrunning what natural selection does, well, naturally.
But there have been critiques too.
In a 2019 paper, the authors say that these experiments undoubtedly teach us about tameness in foxes and the genetics related to behavioral changes, but they might not actually provide evidence for domestication syndrome.
They argue that domestication syndrome is too hand-wavey of a term, because we still don’t have a core list of traits reported in all domesticated mammals.
For example, only domestic pigs seem to have decreased brain size relative to the rest of their bodies.
And some breeds of domestic animals have floppy ears while others don’t.
I’m telling you, my cat can airplane ear with the best of them.
In other words, domestication syndrome can be something of a hot topic.
Some scientists don’t seem to be as interested in building a canonical list of domestication syndrome traits.
Instead, their focus seems to be on explaining the biological mechanisms that might lead to traits we associate with domestication.
Some focus on the balance of different hormones being produced or released at different times.
Others focus on how parasitic infections might affect all the biological systems that are involved in domestication, or how developmental processes might get interrupted to make adult animals look and act more cute and baby-like.
And in 2014, a team of scientists proposed that neural crest cells or NCCs could be driving the physical and behavioral changes that happen to species during domestication.
Neural crest cells form really early in the development timeline of any animal with a backbone.
They start out forming where the backbone will be, but migrate throughout the embryo to form different structures.
They’re a kind of stem cell, which basically means that they’re generalists and can become a lot of different specialized body parts.
NCCs help form parts of an animal’s head, tail, and their melanocytes— which control the color of skin, fur, or hair.
And all those body parts also show up in domestication syndrome.
The core idea this team proposed is that domestication leads to some sort of reduced activity of neural crest cells Either not as many NCCs form to start with, they don’t move as easily through the developing embryo, or they grow slower once they actually start forming structures.
And—importantly—because NCCs are in all vertebrate species, this idea can be tested by comparing domesticated vertebrates to wild ones.
Plus, NCCs could affect the development of different animals in different ways, so the Neural Crest Domestication Syndrome hypothesis could explain why there’s no one-size-fits-all domestication syndrome checklist.
So this is where that viral raccoon study comes in.
Have I kept you waiting long enough?
Raccoons are vertebrates!
So they have neural crest cells that drive their development, just like cats and silver foxes and humans.
Some populations of raccoons have been living alongside humans for decades, and eating our trash, bird seed, and pet food.
Fortune favors the bold, in this case the bold raccoon who doesn’t run away from your trash can when you start yelling at it.
According to the researchers, this could be acting as a selective pressure on the raccoons to live more closely alongside humans.
So they could conceivably be developing adaptations that are in line with domestication syndrome.
And, raccoons are not really being bred by humans right now.
We’re not experimentally creating domestic raccoons like Belyaev did with silver foxes, so this possible domestication process is much slower, like the natural selection that led to our cat and dog friends.
And even though it’s tempting to jump ten steps ahead of the researchers’ conclusion, this paper isn’t making any claims about raccoons being domesticated!
It doesn’t say anything about a mutualistic relationship with them, where they help us somehow and we control their survival.
This team was specifically trying to study whether urban raccoons had one visible trait that appears on that general domestication syndrome checklist and could be caused by NCCs.
And that trait is: a shorter snout.
So these researchers looked at 19,495 photos of North American raccoons from the citizen science website iNaturalist, where anyone can share pictures of the world around them.
After the team divvied up the photos and screened them one by one to make sure that the raccoon was the correct species and their head was clear enough to measure their snout, they ended up selecting a mere 249 of those images for further analysis.
Based on the locations tagged on iNaturalist, they split these images into 211 “urban” raccoons that were snapshotted in counties with more than 20,000 people and 38 “rural” raccoons from counties with fewer people.
Then, they got to measuring all these raccoon snouts.
And, after some data analysis, they found that urban raccoons had 3.56% shorter snouts than their rural cousins.
Actually a little underwhelming once you get under the hood.
However, because other research involving urban foxes and mice has also found a pattern of shorter snouts on city-dwellers, the authors suggest that the proximity to humans could bring about this physical change that may be linked to domestication.
But that does not, by any stretch, mean they are domesticated.
At best it’s a baby step.
And there could be other explanations.
For example, climate affects the snout length of raccoons, and could throw a big confounding variable into the mix.
More research is definitely called for.
Understanding domestication will take a lot of time, smart questions, and different experts— geneticists, biologists, ecologists, anthropologists, and so on.
All the -ists!
Except physicists, I don’t think we’ll be in this After all, we’ve lived alongside cats for thousands of years and can’t claim to completely understand how they were domesticated.
So that’s also why the authors of that 2025 paper suggested that other domestication researchers look a little more closely at these trash pandas!
Even if a couple experiments have shown that tameness is linked to the physical traits of domestication syndrome, like a shorter snout in a couple animals, there’s simply too much we don’t know about raccoons right now.
What we do definitely know is that raccoons carry a ton of infectious diseases that could make you extremely sick!
So can you invite that raccoon that digs through your barbecue scraps into your house as a pet?
No.
And will you be able to have a raccoon as a pet in the relatively near future?
Also no.
I’m sorry, but I promise… we’re just looking out for you.
[ OUTRO MUSIC]
Related Videos
Secrets of the Sea: The Ocean’s Most Powerful Creatures & Their Amazing Abilities! 🌊🦈
SwampyTales
3K views•2026-05-29
POV: You're a Shark. The Octopus Already Knows You're There.
tentacleeeee
297 views•2026-05-28
How Do You Know If You're Getting Enough Vitamin D?
DrPeterKan
765 views•2026-05-29
800+ New Species Discovered in the Pacific!
raizen05-j6k
295 views•2026-05-30
River Monsters Full Episode - Killer Weapons
rivermonsters
4K views•2026-06-03
@CreatureCases - 🌊☀️ 🌈🦊 Kit & Sam’s Sunny Adventures! 💖🐝 | Best Friends in Action 🌴✨| Compilation
CreatureCases
1K views•2026-05-28
Bird Nest Monitoring | Hidden In Plain Sight!!
thegeordierambler4373
251 views•2026-05-30
Seedling under seize #pest #plant_predators
Makeitsimple99
181 views•2026-06-01











