Who's Responsible for This Monster of Modernity?

Añadido: 2026-06-04

[00:00:01]Hello everybody.

[00:00:03]You may have heard that Bonnie Blue, she's the only fans girl crossed with sort of an evil conval type figure uh doing these utterly insane uh debortched and disgraceful sex stunts normally in some form of a well highly disturbing orgy. She's plummeting to new lows.

[00:00:25]Apparently she's pregnant. Who on earth got her pregnant? and she's uh doing one of her stunts while pregnant, which is obviously just so disgusting and appalling. Uh it it's just beyond belief. But again, she thrives on that shock value. It's very much her USP. And she makes millions from it. I do wonder who quite gets off on on her content.

[00:00:46]Clearly quite a few people do given her income. Um those poor souls truly are lost. Uh but anyway, I saw a very interesting debate developed yesterday on the Twitter sphere where you had writists saying to the left, well, look, this is this is the end result of your ideology of of ripping apart uh traditional values of women's liberation and so on, and look where it's got us.

[00:01:12]And the left types were hitting back saying, well, you know, actually this is this is something else. It's it's the market in in play, the attention economy and so on.

[00:01:22]And I think it begs the question, well, who or what is ultimately responsible for Bonnie Blue? And it's a big question. We can try and ignore her and mute her and and block her and the rest of it, but the problem with that is you can chop the head off the snake, but that's not going to get rid of snakes.

[00:01:39]We have open the doors to hell in modernity, and we're going to have to face it down. We're going to have to look it in the face and overcome it. Uh otherwise this is just going to keep happening and it's going to get worse and worse and worse. We've already seen that. That's why Bonnie Blue is on the media, the mainstream media.

[00:01:58]Confused feminists may well look in shock at her, surprised as why she's not reading, you know, Kate Millet and Judith Butler. Uh but this is the reality of of female liberation in some senses. But the point is she thrives on that outrage, you know, because it brings eyes to her. It brings attention to her. It brings income to her. The more we focus on it, yes, it feeds the beast, but not focusing on it doesn't mean it's going to go away. It's going to keep growing because clearly lots of people are investing in this. Now, let's just deal with the obvious one from the top. Some people will say, well, look, Bonnie Blue is responsible for Bonnie Blue. And to some extent, well, that's true. But unless you're completely committed to a worldview of liberal libertarian individualism, which I think increasingly fewer and few of us really are, I think one of the great developments over the past 5 to 10 years on the right, arguably uh on elements of the left has been this realization that we are more than individuals and it's unwise to have ideologies which view us as individuals and the only reason they worked because they were predicated on uh prior collectivized um foundations of who and what we are, religion, nation, people and so on. So individualism if you like could could have a springboard from those but those have all been eradicated now by liberal modernity and the global market. So all you have is the individual uh really now and the individual is unwise uh as I think we've come to see. So the point is that Bonnie Blue at least in my view isn't an island. She might be psychopathic. She might be deeply unwell but she's still working within a landscape uh within a millu which allows her uh deep subversiveness and and well deeply deeply deeply sick soul to grow and and to affect others on on on quite a scale. So we have to ask or in my view we have to ask the question who or what is responsible for Bonnie Blue? And uh I started thinking about this when I saw Owen Jones tweeted uh in reference to Bonnie Blue's latest stunt that he'd never felt more rightwing. This is where the debate started. And of course, it's ironic given Jones's behavior because it's a tacit acknowledgement from Jones that uh Blue's behavior is not consistent with conservative moral disposition that the conservatives were right about something. Now Jones obviously has said, "Oh, it was tongue-in-cheek, but I think we all get the message. he accidentally let slip the traditional moral frame which honestly speaking is the moral frame uh is something real and and even that Jones can riff on it goes to show there's something to it and what uh liberals have referred to as quote freedom and leftists have referred to as the liberation of women as I say has led to this uh it's not just Bonnie blue of course we have mass prostitution in our society it's on an abominable scale uh along with mass culling of the unborn.

[00:04:57]These have been the great results of of liberation and quote freedom. Now Jones hit back saying, you know, I was joking and so on. And and and this is what's led to this really interesting debate between the quote right and left. And as I keep saying in these videos, we're entering an era or have for a while, which is post left and right. And if we're still completely locked into those battles, not to say they're not real and they don't have genuine worth at times, but if we're completely ideologically right or completely ideologically left, at this point, I think we're still probably in the trap of modernity. And we'll we'll explore this in this video through the prism of of Bonnie Blue.

[00:05:35]There is something higher waiting to be born. Now, as I say, if you look at this on Twitter, it's pretty cliche. The right say, "Well, Bonnie Blue is the result of leftism, feminism, the hatred of traditional values, the destruction of all hierarchy, religion, the general moral decay in our society, a hatred of men and the rest of it." You know, Bonnie Blues do not come from conservative societies. Even Joan Jones can see that. And I think that's all true. I think that's fair. But I also saw many leftists, I believe, making fair points back. And as usual, because we're so ideologically attached, our ego is attached to ideology, so we feel personally attacked. We just try and find a gotcha on the left. But I thought some leftists, not all, but some were making a valid point that look, Bonnie Blue is working within a libertarian framework. She votes for reform or supports reform after all. uh and her actions are the result of really an amoral not immoral but amoral capitalistic system within which the profit motive is everything. You know it doesn't matter if it's good or bad. What matters is profit and we live in an attention economy for better or worse.

[00:06:45]We still see this in the algorithms on YouTube. I know myself if I write a title in capital letters more people will click on it and they're not going to be as high quality views to be blunt.

[00:06:55]They're going to be people who just want high churn, high dopamine, yell and scream, on they go. But people who are more thoughtful will engage more in longer content. But these people are being bred out of society. I did a video the other day on screens and how youngsters, they're being turned into passive consumers rather than active creators. Anybody concerned about the health of our people should work their to their utmost to be an active creator in any means you can. Whether that's in your personal life, in your personal art, your personal work, whatever. We need to make sure we have that capacity to us. Otherwise, we become passive and we'll just die away. We certainly won't be able to raise the next generation.

[00:07:37]Now, as you might imagine, you know, the libertarians came out and said, "Well, you know, you don't get any of these arguments for this in Rothbard or Freriedman or Rand or whoever else." But as usual, you know, I think these people, they they almost put the uh car before the horse. They forget that a lot of these uh free market types were riffing on a system which had a pre-existing unity among people to allow it to flourish. As I always say, economics is secondary to the traditional order. Modernity flips it.

[00:08:06]It's all economic arguments first and the merchant either leads or if you like the state manager leads uh rather than the king, the priest, the warrior who in traditional societies would rule and and acts if you like figureheads which would pass down moral purity to the to the whole. But these debates are very tiresome of course and they you know you get lost in the weeds. But the point I'm making here is I think both the right and the left have got valid critiques of what's going on. This is why I also believe that that many people, myself included, are getting interested in nationalist ideas. I wouldn't call myself a down the line nationalist. I'm more of a traditionalist, but that I am adjacent to nationalism in my views because the nationalists, in my mind, offer a valid critique and a valid solution of what we're seeing here. Um, despite all of the bad press they get, I think they have a valid point. And that is that what we have in the figure of Bonnie Blue who is symbolic of the dark side of modern globalist liberalism and markets is really a symbol of a desacralized world in which sexuality is completely commoditized, materialized and packaged up for mass consumption.

[00:09:15]Um, and because it's not just Bonnie Blue doing this, you know, there's sways of it online. We all know that you have to be increasingly bizarre, increasingly horrifying, uh, increasingly um, degenerate to just unbelievable depths.

[00:09:31]You know, it's sort of of Babylon.

[00:09:33]I think, you know, Bonnie Blue would make her blush. To get notoriety, you have to do something so disgusting that you can be noticed.

[00:09:42]And then you get the great promise of Western liberalism, money, fame. You know, even if it's for being absolutely disgusting, it's still money. is still fame. There was another Only Fans girl, I forget her name, but she was on Pierce Morgan and you know he said, "What about your your kids?" And she said, "They can cry in the back of a Ferrari." You know, that's that's the that very much the opinion of modernity. And in some senses, you can't blame her for thinking that because that's the message that she's picked up of what success is. It's the mirror of Andrew Tate who will also, you know, cry in or his kids can cry in their Ferrari and so on. even though he would be against it, it's still hanistic modernism, you know, detach from sacred order.

[00:10:25]So, what I'm getting at here is, yeah, by all means, the rightest critique of the left is correct. You know, this is what happens when, well, to be blunt, you go against God or in the language of CS Lewis, you go against the towel, the absolute moral order that all societies have been aware of for all time. It's why you have the golden rule. It's why the traditionalists point towards perennialism. Now that perennialism is understood and expressed in unique ways given the spiritual temperament of a people in time and place such as the Europeans in European civilization and Roman Catholicism and so on and you have Islam in the Arabic world and so on and so on. All right, we might not agree with it but it's their way. That's fine.

[00:11:06]But they all riff off the same central order but they uh have a unique version of it. But when you destroy all of that, when you destroy the higher, when you destroy the transcendent, which implies our traditional gender roles, you know, how we approach life in a moral way, this is what you'll be left with. And though the left always promise liberation, what they leave you with is degradation. Whether that's in economic communism or whether it's what we're seeing now with sort of this left-wing capitalism, which is uh well, not that capitalism would care if you're leftwing or rightwing. That's the heart of globalism. It just is. and it just wants money and profit and growth markets no matter what they are. This is what you end up with. Degradation, soullessness, the wasteland, the hollow men. However, like I've said for a while on the channel, this is why the right in my view must get over the materialist market obsessed liberalism or libertarianism, you know, thatcherism, randianism, and on and on it goes. It must accept that there is a dark side to serving mammon, you know, and we've forgotten all of that because we're not spiritually engaged and aligned anymore.

[00:12:14]That's not me saying that markets haven't produced wonderful things. But there is a dark side to them. And how can you challenge someone like Bonnie Blue and her behavior with nothing but the market? You need something like a collective moral good. You need the kingly figure. You need the priestly class to say no to trust with the authoritarian power to stop this madness from proliferating. Right now, we have nothing. That's why all we really have is a confused LBC presenters who can just shake their head at Bonnie Blue but not understand why or how to stop her behavior cuz it would be illiberal. And being illiberal in the modern era is of course evil. But the point I'm getting at is is if economics and the acquisition of capital become paramount, you'll find again that markets and money are amoral, not immoral, they're amoral.

[00:13:05]And why they worked back in the day is cuz they were predicated on societies which had unity. ethnic unity, homogeneity, generally speaking, a shared moral language and with that some sense of high trust within the nation that's been eradicated by globalist liberalism, you know, which includes markets and left ideology tied tied in together. So now all we have is just this constant pursuit of money and gain and quantity and more and more and more no matter how dark it is, how disturbing it is. So really we just we we give power to whatever selves whether we like it or not. And the soul may scream but the soul has lost any avenue through which sense can be brought back to our people to our civilization.

[00:13:49]And again this works on the level of the individual and the community. It's what happens when you make the merchant king and serve mammon.

[00:13:57]This is why incidentally I keep saying restore have to be so careful about this market rhetoric. They've got to curb the boomer instincts of Rupert Low cuz he's going to put off a lot of the base, you know, and I get it. Like boomers think in terms of freedom from communism, you know, that's the way they think. I hate the state. These kind of like '7s, ' 80s, '90s arguments. That's not the way young people think. You're going to lose the fire of the young people cuz what they're seeing is mass decay, degeneracy, a dollar sign on the sacred everywhere they turn. Everything is debased.

[00:14:29]They need something higher to look towards.

[00:14:32]And like I say, that the market has no answer to Bonnie Blue. It can't do anything other than, well, don't buy it and leave her to it. It's her fault and it's the people who want to buy it, you know, that that they're at fault here.

[00:14:42]Leave them to it if they want to be degenerate. But what does that equal in society? It means you have a class of degenerates. And that degeneracy spreads. It spreads and spreads and spreads. And this is why, you know, you remove the sacred, you move care for our people. And this is what you get. And why again I think nationalism although it's a bureaucratic politicized notion of of a higher concern for for for people it still at least has a sense of concern for the spiritual mental and physical health of people and this is why Bonnie Blue supports reform you know and we shouldn't laugh too much cuz like I say if if Restore go too hard down the market stuff she'll support that as well and again if you keep feeding Mammon you'll get more Bonnie Blues you'll get more hell beasts Now, like I say, through the ideology of the liberal market, what's Bonnie Blue doing wrong? She's a free individual, expressing her own feminist will, and where there's a demand, there can be capital to be gain gained, sorry. And if, like I say, if she's stupid enough to do it, people are stupid enough to buy it, who cares? That's basically the ideology of the age when you boil it down. So, really, what we have to understand here is this is the reality of what we've created. It's the shadow side of our system or even in many senses just what our system is like now.

[00:16:00]And remember there's no collusion with the state or anything here. We can't explain this away as oh you know it's just bad actors behind the scenes. And this is what happens when you have a desacralized society without hierarchy where there's nothing sacred in femininity or masculinity. You just you're left with market principles and base human degradation.

[00:16:19]And like I say, we need in my view something that speaks to uh a higher moral guidance, the bravery to take authority again cuz this isn't really left right. It's the other side of the political spectrum which is authoritarian, libertarian. And so I believe so much of the faults of libertarianism and liberalism and the market ideology comes from the idea that individuals are rational and good. That was only true when most individuals could be somewhat morally unified, like I said, by the prior institutions, whether that's church, shared moral unity, shared cultural and national identity. You remove that, what you have is wild individuals who are deeply unwell with nothing to keep them in line, you know, and all we can do is wash our hands of them and and mute them and block them, but that's not going to get rid of the problem. Again, we're entering a new era where you have to be bold and brave, I believe. uh to try and restore some order. No pun intended.

[00:17:20]Anyway, like I say, liberalism always assumes the healthy individual, but it rejects what makes them healthy. That's the very problem I think we're finding.

[00:17:28]And we're terrified of authority, but we've destroyed all authority, church, family, patriarchy. So, we're without guidance. And this is why I argue that won't work because it presupposes the homogeneous society. And again, it puts the merchant over the priest. the warrior and the king archetypally speaking as well. And and what you're left with in what Bonnie Blue is in many senses is is like Dorian Gray. You know, we have this wonderful glitzy society where we can all look beautiful and put our best version of oursel on Instagram, but Bonnie Blue is like the painting of Dorian Gray in the attic getting uglier and uglier and doing something more disgusting every single time. And we don't know what to do about it. We can't do anything about it in the the present paradigm. And if we continue with this, there will be more Bonnie Blues. It will get darker, more disgusting, more twisted.

[00:18:21]And in many senses, I know it's a a hard thing to face, but you could say she's a dark reflection of our spiritual state, you know, herself. And it's what, like I said, why you can't just mute her.

[00:18:31]There's something more going on here that has to be faced down. But like I say, how do you act in a system that doesn't allow you to act? Because all we have is really to be blunt toothless liberal responses to this sort of behavior. LBC shocked feminists, you know, wondering why, like I say, she's not reading Judith Butler. A gorping Louis Thuru maybe will do a documentary on her with his long pregnant silences that really will lead to nowhere but just more confused and hypocritical liberal sneering. Maybe the best you'll get is spiritually speaking is sort of a you know a word salad sermon from a narcissistic you know declod Russell Brand with his shirt off you know the inviosity of the barren heart without effevescent enlightenment of the eternal to ameliate the delterious nature of the carnal mate all that sort of stuff on and on it goes but it leads to nothing it's just empty words because it's not attaching to anything higher just like he interviewed the other one Lily what's her name always mix up a what what it's Lily Phillips or Lily Collins and I always mix it up. One of them's an actress, one of them's a Bonnie Blue type. So, it's one of them. But he did an interview with her and you know, she she gets herself baptized into Anglican church and and then just carries on her behavior. You know, it is symbolic of of a of a culture, a civilization that's lost its authority to make change, that's detached spiritually.

[00:19:55]And the way that you return that is being brave enough to step into authority. Brave enough to step away from liberalism and liberty. But who's brave enough? And who do you trust? This is why our civilization was wise. We had a church hierarchy. For all of its faults, it gave us a sense of spiritual protection. You couldn't just waltz into it and suddenly you were the star. You had to spend your life learning in spiritual contemplation. You would learn off masters, wise men, and you would climb the ladder. And if you exhibited deep heart, deep wisdom, deep alignment with the eternal truths of life, you could be trusted to lead. And you became something like um a guide for the whole of our society. And that would pass down into the local deacon, into the local vicar. And the vicar would pass that wisdom on to the congregation. And that's just the church. Of course, you had it in other means through the family, through our cultural and national institutions as a people. You know, we mattered as a people. Women mattered, men mattered. And the only way you get this is by authority, not by the free liberal individual who eventually, if all you have is that, we'll just do whatever they want. And you've got no more moral authority to say to them that's wrong. Because you're all just free individuals at the end of the day.

[00:21:12]If they want to say screw traditional morality and I want to go and have a gang bang while I'm pregnant, who are you to say that's wrong? It's just two opinions. That's it. Anyway, like I say, the key here is left and right are both making valid points, but ultimately when you break it down, they're critiquing each other with the same metaphysics, you know, and and they're both utilizing the flattening effects of of modernity to critique the other. So, the right will say, well, you know, you flattened morality, like I was just saying, there's no um hierarchy structure with which you can critique the other anymore. But the left will point to the flattening effects of capital.

[00:21:49]Everything is just it serves capital and that's it. From the traditionalist perspective, both are valid critiques, but both function within the realm of modernity, which is why I keep saying we need to get beyond left and right.

[00:22:01]Something higher must be born. It's not about going back to the 1950s. It's about recognizing which is eternal, everpresent, what CS Lewis refers to as the tower, and understanding that for a new age. So it will be you know the new age the futuristic age but the eternal truths speaking through it rather than the kind of nostalgia pn about the 1950s Britain which you get and it's lovely to look at the way Britain was but we have to understand it's not coming back we can bring the values back but there'll be the values for a new age and we have to reimplement the traditional norms in order to to have that cuz like I say the priestly class whether that's in the church or whatever else acts as our spiritual defenders and there's a higher hierarchy therein to to if you like orient ourselves to the morally higher, the spiritually higher. You also have a warrior class for our physical protection. A lot of people don't feel safe these days and the very men who can keep us safe are the sort of people who are often demeaned by the system, undermined. And you all know I big believer in the true king to unite the people, the symbolic of the nation.

[00:23:06]That's certainly not King Charles.

[00:23:08]That's not his fault by the way. You know, he's just a lost man of modernity like the rest of us. But the true king can rise.

[00:23:15]But the cost of this is we stop being the little gods of liberal modernity demanding our version of reality and morality be recognized. That's a big ask. Scary for people to move away from that. But like I say, liberal ideology and rightist sorry market materialism cannot take us there as they both play to the idea of the freedom of the individual. And that's that's the core problem with liberalism. And if we're to solve the core issue of western modernity, we have to go back to the heart of liberalism itself and reattach with the higher. That's possible in decline. It's not possible when things are good, when you have lots of money cuz it blinds people. It's why Christ said to the rich man, "Go and sell your possessions." Doesn't mean go and become a socialist like leftists think it means. It means if you're dominated by um the matter, the trinkets of the world, you need to let them go. And collectively speaking, we are in that state. It's why I believe the only way back is through traditional order and that will give you much more wealth than anything material. A reconnection with the divine and the religious, the social hierarchy, the unification of a people with the spiritual lineage connected together.

[00:24:21]Now to be blunt, that's not going to come around the corner anytime soon and you can't just implement that with policy. It's one of my critiques of Restore. I don't blame them for trying, but you know, sort of blind if you think you can just implement that with policy from Westminster. These are higher spiritual lines of vitality which give a civilization life.

[00:24:41]And these take men to really engage deeply in the spiritual work which will be hard to overcome and return us to who and what we are. They will be the true heroes of our age, if you will. It's like Dante's Inferno we're in really.

[00:24:55]You know, you kind of have the concentric rings of hell that go down and down right at the bottom of the betrayers. you know, the people who betrayed society. I remember Dante with his guide Virgil. He he doesn't just go back up to the top. He has to go through the center of hell. It's a wonderful spiritual metaphor and it's where we're at. And we're going to have to keep going down. We can't mute hell. We can't pretend it's not there. We're going to have to face it and go through the middle of it and overcome it. That's the only way out for Western man. And when you go through it and you come out the other side, you're not actually in hell any longer. You've evolved. You've evolved. Another interesting analogy in Dante's Inferno is how a lot of hell at the bottom is ice, not fire. And the and the spiritual metaphor there is everything's so stuck you can no longer move. Everything is cold. It's lifeless.

[00:25:44]And again, that's very much Bonnie Blue.

[00:25:46]It's the soul of Bonnie Blue and what she does, isn't it? You know, we sort of see it in there. Another lovely saying I was thinking of with regards to this is Christ saying in uh the biatitudes you know lovely saying truly I say to you you will never get out until you have paid the last penny. I think there's something karmic in there that unfortunately western man has to acknowledge. I think if anybody's telling you that things can be turned around quickly unfortunately that's snake oil. Uh we will have to pay the karmic debt of what western man has fallen into. And it might not be your fault personally speaking. You might have lived a good life, but this shows we're a collective identity. We have a collective people and a spiritual lineage and we have to learn the lessons. But in like in our personal lives when you go through hard times, the lessons you're learning, while they might be brutal, have the seeds of evolution and awakening in them. And if you're open-hearted and open-minded and you listen and you learn and you're willing to shed the skin of what once was into something new, you can overcome. So I would say you know if we look at the state of the world which is getting increasingly debortched and degenerate it's not that we just have to wait for this hell and there's nothing we can do. You can realign now you can be part of the active spiritual revolution that's happening now. We can embrace a traditionalist politics that's unafraid of authority, that's not um psyched out by liberalist promises of the individual, that understands how shallow that is ultimately speaking, that knows that we need authority, but true authority rooted in the higher.

[00:27:14]When you look at so many critiques that the classic left make of rightist hierarchy, what you'll find is yeah, they're right to point at the corruption. There's a Christlike quality to pointing out corruption. But where the left go too far is they demean hierarchy itself. But hierarchy itself isn't bad. It's when hierarchy becomes corrupt, it's bad. That's the point.

[00:27:36]Just like marriage itself isn't bad. But a marriage where the man beats his wife all the time beats. Well, that's bad.

[00:27:42]But it doesn't mean marriage is bad.

[00:27:43]Does that make sense? So the point is here it's reconnecting with the structures of what actually served us and gave us orientation spiritually, personally, collectively, nationally as a people. I would say right now civilizationally as European peoples.

[00:27:57]But recognizing that that become that can become corrupted when enough of us sway especially when our leaders sway.

[00:28:03]That's again why uh in the New Testament you hear a lot about spiritual leaders are under more pressure to be honest because if you're lying and if you're turning to darkness you're turning other people away.

[00:28:17]Anyhow, the point is that if we can embrace this in time, hell beasts like Bonnie Blue can be dealt with. I should really say hell beast working through Bonnie Blue because she's an empty vessel through which darkness uh spreads really. Um, but when you really are spiritually aligned, just like when demons see Christ, the hell beasts within people like Bonnie Blue will squawk and scream and scuttle off back to the fiery abyss from whence they came. But that will not be achieved with reform style free market neoatcherism, nor Russell Brandon style spiritual nicities. And it certainly won't work with leftist ideology. It'll take the true king, the great patriarch, the leader returning to the wasteland and planting new oak trees with the magic soil. It's Christ chasing the money changers from the temple whip in hand.

[00:29:07]That's what's coming for us if we're brave enough to turn to it, of course.

[00:29:11]Anyway, just some thoughts from me on this uh mess of modernity that we're in.

[00:29:16]And I certainly hold out hope. I do believe in the uh hours of decay. It's painful, but it reveals what's true inside of you. And those of us who are spiritually open, no matter the pains of the age, there is something inside of you which is true, which is peaceful, which is strong, which can overcome any darkness. Had a friend asked me a while ago, you know, you talk about this tradition stuff. What era would you like to be in? And I thought about it for a while. And the truth to that is it doesn't matter as long as you're aligned with the here and now, with the everpresent truth of what is, with the traditional order. It doesn't matter whether you're in decay or flourishing cuz it's all cyclical anyway. And the ultimate reality is higher. And if you're aligned with that, you can be okay no matter what. But our society is not aligned with that right now. It's why it will take the true king. It will take the based priest or the return of the base priest, whatever form that comes in. It will take the warriors, you know, once more to pick up the divine sword, metaphorically speaking, of course, for the senses and re-implement the true order. I believe that will come but it comes in decline. Anyway, as I say, that's it from me. A lot of links down below. Join the Substack if you like. If you want more of this content to be part of a community, it's £5 a month or if you just want to support me.

[00:30:31]Uh also there's uh sister channels on spiritual and personal transformation courses and the rest of it. uh joke. Do subscribe to the channel if you're new friends and do take