In the case of Jitender Singh vs. Union of India (May 11, 2026), the Supreme Court bench of CJI Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi dismissed a petition challenging Section 13(2)(iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, after discovering the petitioner was a law student with a personal matrimonial dispute; the court emphasized that Article 15(3) of the Constitution protects special provisions for women and warned against using Article 32 for personal grievances rather than genuine public interest litigation.
深掘り
前提条件
- データがありません。
次のステップ
- データがありません。
深掘り
Personal Vendetta or PIL? 🤨| CJI Surya Kant | #supremecourt #shorts追加:
I filed a preparation order under article 32 of the constitution seeking the involvement of this court indulgence code to lurilu can reinterpret section 1323 of the Hindu succession act.
>> What is your problem with that provision?
>> My my concern is that it should be open to both male and female.
>> No no what is your problem with that provision? Sir, it's basically a genderentric way given to a >> how it is bothering you.
>> You told you to be the chief contractor of all the male society.
>> Ju just to reestablish that I am one of the sufferer.
>> You are self-aclaimed leaders of the male.
>> No sir, I I I am I a sufferer of the remedy.
>> This is what I wanted you to confess if >> you understand that what kind of PL why we should not impose exemplary cost on you. You want to settle a personal.
>> No. No sir. No sir. No. I'm just wanted to because my local stand comes from the fact that I have been suffering a metro litigation for past seven eight years.
had got a had a male got should have a way of hope to get out of these litigations.
関連おすすめ
BREAKING: Judge Kathleen Issues Emergency Arrest Warrant After Trump Defies Order
Frontora
2K views•2026-05-29
8 Hidden Things About Mackenzie Shirilla Netflix's 'The Crash' Didn't Show You
MarvelousVideos
2K views•2026-05-28
MP Garnett Genuis warns Canada’s MAiD system has ‘gone too far’
WesternStandard
187 views•2026-05-28
Trump Impeachment STORM IGNITES as 29 Judges Vote for Conviction!!
DanielBriefDaily
2K views•2026-06-02
THE STREISAND EFFECT AT BARBARA STREISAND’S HOUSE! - First Amendment Audit
KULTNEWS
1K views•2026-05-30
EBK Jaaybo Won’t Be Going To Trial?! | Criminal Lawyer Reacts
floridadefenseteam
404 views•2026-05-29
OFFICE HOURS: The Theft of Black Brilliance... AI and Intellectual Property (w/ Lisa E. Davis)
marclamonthillnetwork
2K views•2026-05-29
सुप्रीम कोर्ट में 5 जजों का शपथग्रहण समारोह #supremecourt #judges #oathceremony #shorts #ytshorts
Bharat24Liv
4K views•2026-06-02











