This method efficiently reduces the complexity of logic to a set of mechanical shortcuts designed for exam survival rather than true understanding. It is a masterclass in tactical utility that prioritizes bureaucratic success over genuine intellectual inquiry.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Como aprender raciocínio lógico rápidoAdded:
Hey everyone, good evening. Goodnight. Good evening, Felipe. Where are you? I arrived. Elias put it there. Hey guys. Let's go.
Our lesson today was one of the topics you requested the most. How to learn fast logical reasoning. Felipe, I need to pass a civil service exam. It helps me. I have to get through this quickly.
My exam is already scheduled. I can't take any more suffering in the private sector.
I need to learn this stuff quickly.
[laughs] Is this happening to you?
If so, you're in the right place because today I'm going to show you how to learn logical reasoning quickly. We're almost there, guys. Let 's all get together and let's put in the chat which contest you're going to take. Help me out here.
Let me bring my bottle over here so I don't get in our way.
Let me see who's chatting with me. People saying goodnight over there.
Let me put it here, in the comments. Ready. Look, one of your comments is popping up here. Hey, Sidã Cida Negreiros, good evening, professor. Viviane is going to work for the prison police in Rio Grande do Sul.
Eurico Luiz is going to work for Petrobras.
Cida is from Fortaleza, Ceará.
Let me see who else. Caixa Econômica or Detran. Manuela put it in. Petrobras, GCM, uh, Banco do Brasil, TJ São Paulo, PRF Administrativo, Petrobra, there are all sorts of competitions there, look, preschool and elementary school teacher, Dalmisa mentioned it, uh, Cresci Bahia, Cleonice said she's going to take the competition in Bahia.
Hey, Andreia from Peruíbe. Hugs, Andreia. We're in this together. I'm taking a test this Sunday. Good luck. Wendel will be working with Petrobras, the City Council, the Federal Highway Police (PRF), and the State Government. A competition is coming up for many, many positions, more than 30,000 positions. This contest that's coming up soon from IBGE, Petrobras, and TJ São Paulo, Fabiana. Let's go. Send a shout-out to Imperatriz in Maranhão. A hug for the Empress of Maranhão, physical education teacher, São Vicente city hall.
Beauty. Let's go. Military Police of Pernambuco, Petrobras recruitment process. Here, look, uh, Fortaleza. Lots of people from Fortaleza watching the live stream today, right? Big hug from Natal! A big hug to Natal, and to all of Rio Grande do Norte. I always say that the best New Year's Eve of my life was in Pipa, there in Rio Grande do Norte, then I went to Natal and stayed in Ponta Negra. I loved it and I will definitely return to Natal. Oh, Recife, Vittor is from Recife. Víor André is going to apply for INSS (Brazilian Social Security Institute). Alright, guys. Let's go.
Well, good evening, professor. Just a little more. I missed your class because I couldn't log in online, thank God. Hey, never let us down, ever. We're in this together, Maria. Let's go, guys. Talk to me, Felipe. Okay, Rose sent it. I obey. Oh, Feira de Santana in Bahia. Rose is a truck driver from Feira de Santana. A hug for Rose and the truck driver. [laughter] Yeah, come on, guys. Let's start our game here. Oh, I live in Ponta Negra. A big hug to you, Ponta Negra. I loved Ponta Negra, Morro do Careca there in Natal, right? Oh, kisses and hugs. Thanks, Rose the Truck Driver. We're in this together. Let's go, guys. Let's begin our little lesson here. That's enough for us, how can I send you my information so you can locate me? Wait, why would I send you your information? I didn't understand. Cati, you must be our student, and that's why, Ktia? I didn't understand your question, but stick around and at the end of class I'll give you our contact information, then you can get in touch, okay?
Welcome, Christmas again. Eulina put it there. It will be a pleasure to return to Natal, and I will definitely come back. I love the Northeast, I 'm passionate about it. Paraíba. Ah, Paraíba, I had the pleasure of visiting it this year. I went with my family from Paraíba, I stayed in, well, I didn't stay in João Pessoa, I stayed in Cabello, right? But I went to João Pessoa, visited the beaches, and loved Paraíba, okay?
Hey, Fernando from Realengo. Fernando.
Fernando. Realengo is where I was born.
Fernando, I was born in Rialengo, I have many friends in Rialengo, I was born on the street of the government in Rialengo, I spent my whole childhood in Rialengo playing soccer on the Periquito field. [laughs] The school I went to, all my elementary education, was in Rialengo, right there on Limites street.
My sister lives in Rialengo, so I 'm always in Rialengo, okay? Come on, guys! Let's begin our little lesson here. Let's go. Grab your paper, grab your pen. Tell me something. Right now, let me show you something.
Pay attention, listen. This one. Oops, what did I do here?
Wait a minute.
Why isn't it showing up?
Oh man, Professor Felipe is being lenient, he's being lenient. Wait a minute. This is where I see your comments, what's going on. And look what I just noticed here. Right now we have 172 people watching live, and look at the number of likes here. I don't understand. I don't understand.
It's almost half.
Half of the people watching me have given me a like. I don't understand this. I'm going to cancel the class. I think you guys aren't trying to learn logical reasoning quickly, are you? That 's not possible. This is what I see.
Whether you're enjoying the class or not, I've chosen one of your most requested topics for today's lesson.
Felipe, help me, I'm desperate, I want to learn the logical trail quickly.
Then I bring up the topic in class and only half the people liked it. Oh, God is watching, isn't He? You come here, study for free, I'm here interacting with you guys and you don't reciprocate with a like, oh my god, punish me! When the test comes, you're going to forget everything I taught you, huh? [laughter] Alright, guys. I already liked it, now that's fine. Great, now that's better. [laughs] Well, I know you just forgot, but don't forget anymore, okay? Go ahead and like this video [laughs] and also, if you're not subscribed to the channel, subscribe to the channel, okay?
Let's go, guys. Let's begin our content here.
Where's the wait a minute? The teacher's lost here today, huh? Ah, now that's more like it, now that's more like it. Alright, let's begin our little lesson for today. Grab your paper, grab your pen, because today's lesson won't be recorded, okay? I'm letting you know now. It will remain available here for a few more hours, but we'll probably take this lesson down tomorrow morning, okay? So, plan ahead, our class should last about an hour, and whoever stays until the end will get a big surprise if you stay until the end of the class, okay? So, let's go.
Welcome to our lesson, where today I'm going to show you how to quickly learn mathematical logical reasoning, the famous RLM or simply logical reasoning. You who are desperate because you either have an exam scheduled or need to learn this material quickly because you have little time to study due to many commitments. So you need help learning logical reasoning quickly and not wasting hours, weeks, or months trying to learn this stuff. How to learn this darn logical reasoning quickly and efficiently. That's what we're going to talk about in today's class. If you don't know me, I'm Professor Felipe Loureiro, a specialist in civil service exams in the exact sciences for almost 20 years, and my purpose is to help you transform your life through passing civil service exams by learning the most feared subjects: the exact sciences. But in today's lesson, we're going to focus exclusively on logical reasoning, talking about how you can learn this subject quickly so you can achieve your approval sooner, okay? So, what are the objectives of our lesson? Let's go. To understand how to interpret logical reasoning questions, to understand why most people fail to learn logical reasoning, and especially how to learn this subject with limited study time. So, if you have little time to study, your exam is already scheduled, or you want to pass quickly and need to learn fast, this lesson was designed to help those who are going through this situation, okay? So, how do you learn dog tracking when you have little time to study? So, let's go.
First, let's get straight to the point, since the goal here is to learn quickly, we need to go straight to what matters. We don't have time to waste. I know that what you want is your approval. But before you understand how to interpret and learn quickly, it's important to understand why most people are so afraid of logical reasoning. There's no point in trying to learn logical reasoning if you're completely blocked when it comes to the subject. It's an example I always give. I once had an acquaintance, it's been quite a while since I've seen him, he was even a Portuguese teacher, okay? But it's been a while since I've talked, you know, life is like that, sometimes you go one way, the other person goes another, I still have feelings for him, but it's been a while since we've spoken. So he had a trauma related to driving. I think he'd already been in a car accident, right? Well, he was there, he wasn't driving, if I'm not mistaken, he was a passenger in the back seat, I don't know. And he had a driving trauma. He never made himself available to learn how to drive, to get a driver's license. Because of that accident he had, he was traumatized and he didn't want to learn to drive, okay? And why am I making this analogy? Because there are people who are completely traumatized by logical reasoning. So, there's no point in someone wanting to learn a subject. He, for example, even if he developed a desire to learn to drive, the first thing he needed to do was deal with this fear he had, because otherwise, when he sat in the car at driving school, during the practical lesson, the moment he sat down to drive, he would freeze, he wouldn't start the car, he would, you know, completely block out. So, before he could learn to drive, he would need to understand, go through a process to understand what he went through, you know, so he could get rid of that trauma and only then could he learn to drive. Do you agree?
And logical reasoning, mathematics, has a lot of that in it. I often say that my biggest challenge isn't teaching you math and logical reasoning, because, modesty aside, I've been doing that for almost 20 years and have helped thousands of people pass civil service exams. So, my biggest challenge isn't making you understand math or logical reasoning, it's showing you that you are fully capable of learning these subjects, because I know that for years and years of your life, you've developed a fear and anger towards math and ended up transferring that to logical reasoning, isn't that right? So, people look at the math, look at the logical reasoning, and they don't even know where to begin. You don't know how to interpret, does that happen to you? Add a hashtag to the chat for me. If this happens to you, you take a logic problem, you take a math problem and it seems like it's all Greek to you, it seems like you don't understand the wording at all, you can't interpret it, you don't even know where to begin the problem. So there are a lot of people who are completely blocked. Knowing this, I have a training program that helps you unlock and overcome this trauma, this fear, both in mathematics and logical reasoning. Many people ask me, "Felipe, do you teach logical reasoning and mathematics from scratch?" That's when I usually say, "No, I teach below zero."
[laughter] Why? Because I take you by the hand and before I start teaching you math and logical reasoning, I help you unlock your potential, overcome your fear and dread of mathematics, using the right tools. Since I also have training in coaching, I use coaching tools precisely to show you where that trauma, that difficulty you've always had in mathematics, lies, so that you can allow yourself to overcome it. I often joke and say that you're going to open your heart to mathematics, to logical reasoning, because as long as you don't allow yourself to, as long as you don't overcome this fear, it's no use; you'll just keep attending a lot of classes, classes, classes, classes, and you'll only get frustrated. That's why I call this training " sub-zero mathematics," because I teach you about things below zero. So, I'll take you by the hand and teach you how to overcome your math trauma. I'll teach you how to study math.
Many teachers back in school told you to study. Now, who was the teacher who sat with you and taught you how to study mathematics? How do you study mathematics?
No one ever sat down with you and taught you, right? The teacher just kept saying, "Oh, you have to study, study to pass the year, study." So, what's the most efficient way to study math? I see that there are people who want to study mathematics the same way they study Portuguese, or study mathematics the same way they study law. It won't work.
Mathematics has a different way of being studied, a different way of being approached, okay? So I'll teach you how to study math, okay? Now let's understand a little about why many people are terrified of logical reasoning. The first reason is that logical reasoning is not taught in most schools. In the vast majority of schools, logical reasoning is not taught, and the concepts of logical reasoning are not presented. So, most of you end up encountering logical reasoning for the first time when you enter the world of public service exams. And then logical reasoning is completely unknown to him. And then you look at those concepts, you see that bunch of Ts and Fs, and you don't understand anything.
You say, "My God, this is totally different."
So, this is something very new for you, something unknown. There's a phrase I like that says: "The new, the different, only scares or bothers us because we haven't yet learned to understand it." Well, another analogy I often use is this: back in college, right? Well, there was a place there, I went in, you know, for a while, I did a math degree, I have a teaching degree in mathematics, and in college, in the first semester, you meet a lot of people, right? And I had a friend there who is now my best friend, whom I met in the first semester of college. It's been 20 years of friendship already, right? Because I graduated 20 years ago. And in our first encounter there, we used to say, and now we joke about it, that I didn't like him at first, right? I didn't like him, we use that term, right? And he didn't like me. We looked at him and said, "Oh, not that crazy guy, right? I don't know about that, you know?" We only greeted each other out of politeness. Why?
Because he was unknown to me. I was unknown. Perhaps you've already been through this situation. Perhaps a friend of yours today, a female friend, was someone you didn't like when you first met them, you didn't take to them at first, but as time passed, as you got to know them, you began to see that they had values similar to yours, they thought very much like you, and then you connected with that person and maybe today they are someone you love, maybe even your husband or wife, I don't know, maybe the first contact wasn't very positive, but then the relationship improved and today you are together.
So I was joking with my friend today about this, right? We didn't really like each other at first, but as college progressed we started studying together, we started playing soccer together, and that's how we gradually became closer, and today we're friends. So I was his best man at his wedding. So, he's someone very close to me today, he's my best friend now, but back in the beginning, when he was a stranger, I used to say I didn't like him. And this often happens with logical reasoning, because until we master the language of logical reasoning, think about how you're learning English for the first time. When you first started learning English back in school, new words, new concepts, a different language, right? No, you weren't used to it, because our language here is Portuguese, so we weren't accustomed to it. But little by little we start to recognize some words, right? Because English has its own language, just as Portuguese has its own language. And logical reasoning, it also has its own language. So, when you start studying logical reasoning, it's important to understand that you're studying a new subject, with a different language. It doesn't mean it's difficult, it doesn't mean you weren't born to learn logical reasoning, it's just that it's still unknown to you. And what's interesting is that many of my students often say that they hated logical reasoning, but after they saw it, they become, you know, my students. They receive support within our platform, where I answer questions, provide materials, video lessons, and follow up with our students.
They tell me that they're out on the street and are desperate to get home so they can study, right? So addicted to studying race logic. But why? Because it's normal for human beings to only like studying what they understand. What we don't understand, we don't want to study. That's why it's important for you to study logical reasoning open to a different language. In order for you to learn logical reasoning quickly, it 's important that you understand that it's a different language. Oh, I'm learning something different here, and I have to be open to learning new things, because otherwise I won't be able to get the most out of this subject.
Perfect? So, it's not because it's difficult, it's because it's different and you have n't yet learned how to master it. And in today's lesson you're going to learn, okay?
Secondly, because it is associated with mathematics. So, since logical reasoning is closely linked to mathematics, people think like this: "Ah, if I'm not good at math, and I never was good at math in school, then I'm not going to be good at logical reasoning either." If you think like that, well, [laughs] you're wrong. The vast majority of the content in logical reasoning has nothing to do with mathematics. You'll see that today's lesson won't involve calculations or numbers.
So, the fact that you have some difficulty with math doesn't prevent you from learning logical reasoning, okay? And many people, by making this association, end up blocking logical reasoning. Just to give you an idea, the last two international assessments placed Brazil among the 10 worst countries in the world in learning and mathematics. Young people who were finishing elementary school and entering high school, about 70% of them don't even know basic math. That's what the last two international assessments showed, right? So, Brazil is among the 10 worst countries in the world. And an assessment by our federal government at the end of high school showed that 95% of students don't know the basics of math. So, most test-takers end up applying all this mathematical difficulty to logical reasoning as well. Ah, I'm not good at logical reasoning. Then I say, "But have you actually studied reasoning the right way?" No, Felipe, but if I haven't learned math, I'm not going to learn logical reasoning either. That's wrong, isn't it? You'll see today that you are indeed capable of learning logical reasoning, even if you have difficulty with mathematics. But of course I want to help you not only with logical reasoning, but also with mathematics. And this presents a great opportunity. Why?
Because the vast majority of people end up failing because of the math, because of the logical reasoning. So, if you learn to master these subjects, especially quickly, you end up gaining points that the vast majority don't achieve. And that's why the people who study mathematics and logical reasoning in the right way, learning to interpret, end up succeeding; by learning to interpret the questions, they end up achieving approval. So, math, logical reasoning, the exact sciences, end up being the key to success for the vast majority of people, okay?
Third reason: because many test-takers believe they can solve problems using everyday logic.
This mistake is very common, okay? So, notice this, another analogy I'll make: look, when you're chatting on WhatsApp with a friend, with your husband, with your wife, or your son or daughter, it's not normal to write "VC" instead of "PQ".
It's normal for us to do that. Now, when it comes to a Portuguese exam, in the essay section, can we do this here? No. The language we use in everyday life is not suitable for a public service exam. It cannot. This will cause you to lose points on a public service exam. So, what you do in your daily life, you can't do during the exam. And it's the same thing in logical reasoning. The way you think and reason in your daily life.
Often, if you do this during the test, it will lead you to make a mistake. I'll give you an example.
Look at this sentence here. Look at this sentence here.
Study and work. Okay? This is a sentence that logical reasoning calls a logical proposition, okay?
We call it a compound proposition.
Why? Because it's a phrase composed of two ideas: study, work. And then there's what we call a connective, which is a little word that links the two ideas. She's doing this and connecting the two ideas, study and work. Perfect. What have exam boards been doing a lot in tests recently? He gives you a sentence like this and asks you what the negation of that sentence is?
Whenever you see negation in logical reasoning, I want you to think of the opposite, the reverse, okay? So, if you're trying to use everyday logic, you might think: "Well, studying and working, what's the opposite of that?"
Then, those who aren't studying, who aren't grasping the concepts of logical reasoning, will want to use everyday logic, thinking: "Well, the opposite of that is: I don't study and I don't work.
Try doing that and you're screwed." Why? Because I wanted to use everyday logic, okay? This is what I mean by a risk of failing.
You can't deny the "and" with another, and you just can't, okay? The rule of logical reasoning that we call De Morgan's Law, in honor of Augustus de Morgan, who studied and developed it, okay?
And he proved that to negate the conjunction "and," you would use the conjunction "or." So, the answer is either I don't study or I don't work. And here's the first tip for those of you who want to learn logical reasoning quickly, which is my promise to you in this lesson, okay? If you want to study logical reasoning in a complete, in-depth way, right?
to understand the smallest details. Then you can create a truth table, proving and understanding why this is the case. Now, if you want to learn logical reasoning quickly, all you need to know is this.
You will deny the first one, you will deny the second one, and always replace " and" with "or". Always. So, if you have "e" (and), you put "ou" (or). If you have it, either put it there.
He finished. That's the law, the rule we use, okay? It's the same as in Portuguese there.
Why is "casa" spelled with an S and not a Z?
Ah, Felipe, I don't know. That's because that's how it is. Yes, that's how it is. Ready. So, replace the "E" with "ou". Just like "casa" (house) is spelled with an S. And we don't go around thinking, " Why is it spelled with an S and not a Z?"
Because if I spelled it with a Z, it would also be "casa" (house). Why is it S and not Z?
Because S. is over. Simple. [laughter] That's how you sign up with S.
That's it. And he always spells it with an S. And that's not going to change. It's the same thing here. Will you replace the "e" with "ou" always and that's it? You have to keep discussing it, because the more you delve into it, the longer it will take you to understand the logical reasoning. Now, if you have more time to study, if you want to understand all the details, okay? That's how I am, I want to understand why, ah, I want to study it more in depth, but I 'm not taking a civil service exam anymore.
You don't have time to waste. You want to learn this quickly because you want to pass the test soon. So don't get into that minor detail. That's how it is, that's how it is. That 's the rule. Yes, it's always like that. AND. Then it 's over. You have to use this. So take away the 'e' and put in the 'ou' and that's it. Don't waste time. This is how you will learn quickly. Take the rule and apply the rule, okay?
And what are you going to do when the questions come? Let's go. So, the first thing, the first tip for you to learn quickly, I've already given you, okay? Learn the rule, apply the rule, and that's it.
We're in an exact science, so it will always work. That's the advantage of mathematics and logical reasoning. It always works.
The Portuguese language is what works with expression. Portuguese has many exceptions, right? There are rules and there are several exceptions. We don't make exceptions here. Here we adopt the exact sciences. Then the "and" will come, or it always ended.
Perfect. And that's the first tip. The second tip for mastering quick logical reasoning is to first interpret the question. You'll understand what the question wants, what it's asking of you. In the previous example, what was she asking for? The negation of the self. Okay, that's what he wants. I looked at the statement, saw negation, looked at the sentence, saw the "and," and I understood. I don't care about the rest of the statement. This is what I need to interpret quickly and objectively.
Perfect. Beauty. Once you understand what the question is asking, you need a recipe for it, a model, a solution for it. Beauty? And that's what we call a resolution model. This M here stands for resolution model. What model did we use there? It was the model of what I call a baby. See? It was the baby's model.
Felipe, who is this baby? We rejected the first idea, we rejected the second idea, but in the baby's name, the 'e' becomes 'ou' and the ' ou' becomes 'e'. It's OK?
So, deny it, deny it. I remove the 'e', put the 'ou'.
If it is, boot and. That's what I have to do. Perfect. Again, deny it, deny it. I remove the 'e', put the 'ou'. If it's the boot, then... That's what I have to do.
Now that I know the model, I'll move on to the operation. I'm going to the car. That's why the trick, by itself, won't help anyone if you don't know how to apply it. This OP here is for operation, it's the application of the model.
So, negation of the "and" puts the baby. There's even that joke. Negation of the "and makes baby." Negation of the "and makes baby." If you're going to have a baby, you have to do it right. If you do it wrong, it's bad. [laughs] Cool? So you have to make the baby. Yes, but what is a baby? Do you understand? It's no use. So, just using a trick isn't enough, okay? What does "baby" mean?
You're going to reject the first idea. So, study, turn around, don't study. I traveled, but I did n't travel. I'm not, then I am. So, negation transforms the affirmative into the negative and the negative into the affirmative. Another example: I did n't study and I traveled. I did n't study and I traveled. What is the negation of that?
He wants the negation of what I've already interpreted.
Negation of "and I've already interpreted it." What do I have to do? What is the model?
What's the recipe? It's the baby. So, deny it, deny it, I take off the 'e', I put on the 'o'. If it were, I would either put it there. Perfect. I'm going into surgery now. I'm going to apply the model now.
So, I didn't study negation.
I studied or traveled. The denial: I didn't travel.
Okay, that's the answer. He finished. Let's look at a little issue here. Look at this. Gabriel bought the Nacional jersey and saved it for a special occasion. One day, when a friend came to his house, his sister asked: "Did you put on your shirt and go to the game or to the bar?"
Look at that sentence, it's using two conjunctions, "o" and "o" or "o". I have three ideas there, look. He put on his jersey, went to the game, and then went to the bar. He has three ideas. Then he asks, "What is the negation?"
Well, I want the negation of "and" and "or". I've already interpreted what's written above. Nacional's jersey, your sister, just a bunch of nonsense.
You just have to look at the statement and see the negation. And within the sentence, what connective do I need? I have it and I have it.
Beauty? Which resolution model? It's the baby's model.
What does the baby say? He denies everything. Where there is an "e", replace it with "ou". Where there is "ou", exchange it for "e". So we end up denying everything.
I remove the 'e', put the 'ou'. If it is, boot and. That's what I have to do. Now we're going to proceed with the operation. Let's go! He put on the t- shirt. What is the negation of that? He didn't put on the shirt.
The 'e' became 'ou'. He went to the game. What is the negation? He did n't go to the game.
OK. Now, either to the bar, that is, either he went to the bar, the negation, and he didn't go to the bar. So I want you to take note of this trick that the exam boards have been using, okay? Can't you see this one?
Look, not even that! The 'e' is inside it right here, look. See? So this "or" was transformed into ego. Why didn't he even show up? Neither does it mean "nor".
When I say "I neither study nor work," I mean I don't study and I don't work. So, " nem ao bar" means "he didn't go to the bar" and "he didn't go to the bar".
All good? So, the answer is E.
Notice that the E became the e and the ou became e.
So, if it appeared, he's saying no. So, instead of saying "and I don't work," I say "I don't even work." It's OK?
Join the "e" with "não" and "boto nem." It's OK?
Portuguese people do this thing they call contractions, right? Eh, join the 'e' with 'não' and turn it into 'nel'. It's OK? Perfect, Felipe.
Let's do another example. Come on, then.
According to propositional logic, more precisely logical equivalences and De Morgan's laws, blah blah blah blah blah blah blah. It's all just stalling. We can say that the negation of the sentence is, "the sun rises and the birds sing."
Negation of "and I've already interpreted it." Which resolution model? Baby model.
So, negate the first one, negate the second one, remove the 'and' and add the 'or'. Let's go to the operation. Let's apply the model. Let's go. The sun rises. Denial. The sun does not rise. Here, look. The O turns into the O. The birds are singing. Denial.
Birds don't sing. Answer key. B for ball. He finished. This is how you will learn logical reasoning quickly.
Pay attention.
To help you learn logical reasoning quickly, that's the first tip I've already given you, right? When you're studying the material, take the idea from it and apply it. If you stay, thinking, "Ah, but I want to understand this more deeply, ah, I want to prove this, this, this—on the one hand, yes, on the one hand it's good, you understand more, you delve deeper—now, on the other hand, your study will take longer." So, and notice that in several issues, all you need to do is know how to apply the model. So, this speeds up your studies. Second, you apply the mop method. Did I understand correctly? What's the recipe for solving this? What is the rule? Which law do I use, and which law will I apply? This is our real estate method. Perfect. And the third idea I want to show you now, when you're studying logical reasoning, is that it's very important to automate some things. I'll give you an example here. When you're starting to drive, you know, I don't know if you have a driver's license, but when you're starting to drive, it seems like the hardest thing in the world. Why? You have to look in the rearview mirror, you have to shift gears, and then you have to pay attention to cars that are cutting you off, and you have to use your turn signals, and you have to control the clutch, and there are a lot of things to do. And then it seems like it's the hardest thing in the world. You let the car stall. Why? Because you're not used to that process yet.
As you keep practicing, and practicing, and practicing, you end up automating things. You shift gears and you don't even remember shifting gears. You glance in the rearview mirror instantly. You're not staying, oh, now I have to look in the rearview mirror.
Oh, I don't have that now. You're already on autopilot.
Sometimes you don't even remember what gear you're in. You're there, driving, and sometimes you're in fourth gear, but you think you're in fifth because you kept shifting gears and you don't even remember anymore. It 's the same thing when it comes to cooking. You're going to make rice, you're going to make beans, you're already used to cooking, you do it automatically. Very often, I'll just add water to the rice. Sometimes you don't even measure anymore, you just eyeball it and you already know how to season the food, you just grab the right amount, you don't even bother measuring. Why? Because it's already automatic. And it's the same thing here.
So you have to automate your study process more and more. Wow, negation of the... and you start to see that the ideas are repeating themselves. So negate, negate, take out the 'e', put in the 'o' or 'o' and go on autopilot. It goes on automatic.
And then, when it becomes automatic, you never forget it again. Not only do you learn quickly, but you never forget.
That's why it's so important for you to learn the content and practice, doing exercises so that it becomes automatic. And then you solve the problem faster and faster, you learn faster and faster because you've already automated the process. And within the field of exact sciences, it's very common for exam boards to repeat questions, not necessarily repeating the exact same thing, but repeating the idea. So, you see this type of question all the time in exams. In any exam that requires logical reasoning, a question like this will appear. And then you look, you glance at it, oh, negation of the 'e', negation, negation, take out the 'e' and put in the 'ou'. He finished. And then you can resolve the issue quickly. Want to see? Another one. Look at this one. A proposition logically equivalent to negation. Here, look, I've already seen the negation. Pedro analyzes the economic environment, while Laura executes the projects.
He finished. He wants the negation of "or". I 've already interpreted it. Which resolution model? It's the same model. It's Nenê. It's the same rule for both.
So, negate the first one, negate the second one, remove the "and," add the "or." In this case, since it's " or," you'll put "and." Beauty? Then, remembering the baby, you're going to the operation. Now it's your turn to put it into practice.
So, Pedro, analyze what the negation is.
Pedro doesn't analyze here, look. Pedro doesn't analyze. The "or" turned and Laura executes.
What is the negation? Laura doesn't execute.
He finished. Answer key D for date. It's the same idea. And then it goes into automatic mode. It goes into automatic mode. No, no. Take out the "o" and put in the "ou". If it is, boot and. That's what I have to do. He finished. Perfect. Let me see if there's another one of these here. He has. And I want you to put the answer key for me in the chat. Let me come back here, okay? This was the question.
These two. These three. This one here is number four. Let's go. Put it in the chat for me. Number four is the template for the can. Let's go. Oh, I have a surprise for you guys in a little while! I have a surprise for you in just a little while.
One more thing, you're missing some likes, huh? That's a lack of likes, huh? [laughs] Give me another tip, professor. I'll send it now. Today we have four tips and tricks for you here. This is just the first one. Only the first one. Let's go.
Hey, what's the answer to question number four? Put the template number four on the side. D for data, D for data, D for data, D for data. Let's go over here. So, he's asking us to negate a sentence that used "or". He finished.
Negation of "or". I'm going to make the baby.
He finished. So, Marcelo doesn't like football. We're going to deny it, Marcelo likes football. Or it will turn into him.
Bruno doesn't like swimming. Bruno is going to turn around; he likes swimming. Data provided.
He finished. That's it, quick, practical, and to the point, okay? So that you can quickly achieve your approval.
Look at this one now. According to logical equivalence, the negation of the sentence is, if Paulo buys a car, then he does not pay cash. Oops, it stopped.
[snoring] Now you can observe and see.
Is he talking about "and there," "or"? No, he 's talking about a different connective, which is connective C. So now I need a different law, a different rule, a different recipe for this situation. When he gives me the [clearing throat] and the, I already know which law I'm going to use, which rule I'm going to use, but now he's giving me the yes. Okay, then? So, write this down. When we have "o" and "o", which rule do we use? It's the baby's law, which is formally called the demogram law, okay? But we're going to create the baby's law here, which is the baby's trick. Where the 'e' becomes 'ou', the 'ou' becomes 'e'.
Perfect. Beauty. Now we have the yes.
So, what is the law that we are going to use in si?
So, it's the law, it's the model, it's the fool's recipe.
Where will you uphold the first and deny the second? And yes, then he also turns around, okay? Either he turns around and denies both.
Yes, then he turns around, maintaining the first statement and negating the second. Felipe, give me an example. Yes, I'll give you an example.
Oh, if I study, then I pass.
What is the negation of this sentence quickly? You're going to remove the "si," you're going to remove the " então," and you're going to replace it with "e," okay? The first you keep, the second you, the first is everything that is between you and then.
Everything in between "si" and "então" you should keep. You don't change anything, you just repeat the same steps. So, study, keep studying.
And then you deny the second one. So, dude, keep it and deny it. Maintain and deny.
Maintain and deny. Passo vai virar não passo.
So, the answer. I study, but I don't pass. It could be like this too, oh. I studied and did n't pass either. It's true. Whatever.
Whether it's in the present, past, or future, it doesn't matter. Is that OK? But first, you must keep the idea in mind: study, continue studying. The second one, you must deny, becomes "passo" (step) and "não passo" (non-step). OK? Another example.
Another example. If I do n't diet, then I gain weight.
What is the negation?
Negation of the self. So, "mané" is the solution.
Negation of the self. So, "mané" is the solution.
So, keep the first one and deny the second one.
The "yes" and "then" are going away, okay? So, keep the first one. I don't diet. You maintain it, I don't diet, you don't change the first one.
And the second one you deny, do I gain weight, don't I gain weight.
So, the answer is no, I don't diet and I don't gain weight. So, the first one, if it's in the affirmative, remains in the affirmative. If she's in the negative, she'll stay in the negative. The first one, you don't touch it, you just leave it as is. And you're only going to deny the second one, okay? Now that we've seen this trick, let's move on to the answer to this little question here. According to logical equivalence, the negation of the sentence is, if Paulo buys a car, then he does not pay cash. Negation of the self. So, "mané" is the solution. So, keep the first one and deny the second one. Replace "si" and "então" with " e", OK? So, look, Paulo buys a position, and we keep it. Paulo buys a car.
[clearing throat] And the second one we refuse, we don't pay cash. What's the opposite of not paying cash? Pay in cash. The correct answer is letter e, and that's it.
Negation of the self. So, "mané" is the solution.
One more. Renata said the following: "If Lucas won the game, then Denis didn't show up. What are you going to do during the test?" I'm interpreting which connective I saw in the sentence? Tell me in the chat which connective I saw in the sentence. Tell me which connective I saw in the sentence. Please provide the connective for the sentence. I'm not asking for the answer key, I'm asking for the connective. What is the connective in the sentence?
Beatriz replied: "Yes, then."
Livia. Yes. So Marcelo Henrique, if then if then, okay? So when the question comes, during the test, you're going to get there and mark "yes". Okay, then? Go there and mark your name. So, your brain has already started to switch on. Hey, it 's yes. So, you already know that you can't use " nenê" (baby), because "nenê" is the law of "and" or " or". Ali is neither "e" nor "o," it is "si." Okay, then. Lucas angrily stated that the phrase Renata had said was not true.
Just a bunch of blah blah blah blah blah. A sentence that, from a logical point of view, is a negation.
He finished. He finished. Negation of the self. So, " mané" is the solution. So, the solution model is the "dumb" model, where we keep the first equation and negate the second. Mané, he maintains and denies it. Maintain and deny. So now I'm going to the operation.
The "si" and "então" will become "e," okay? So, the first one is Lucas won the game. You're going to keep this up. Lucas won the game.
And then the second time you're going to deny it, Denis didn't show up. What is the opposite of "did not show up"? Denis showed up. The correct answer is C. If he said he did not attend, the negation, the opposite of did not attend, is attend. It's OK?
Answer key, letter C. [snoring] One more. Look how we're automating the process, see? And then you'll learn faster and faster. The process becomes automated.
Production line, the process is being automated. Here, look, is the negation of the conditional statement. If Carlos didn't do well on the exam, comma, he'll stay home. When a sentence begins with "si," the comma acts as "então" (then). Beauty?
I can put it this way: if I study, then I pass. It's the same as saying if I study, comma, pass. So, when the sentence begins with "si," the comma acts like a morbid nuisance. And he wants that denied.
He finished. negation of yes. So, "mané" is the solution. So, we'll uphold the first one, and deny the second one. The first one, she says: "Carlos, you didn't do well on the exam." We don't change the first one; we just copy and paste it.
Carlos didn't do well on the exam. We'll repeat it. Carlos didn't do well on the exam.
And the second one we're going to refuse, we're going to stay home. What is the opposite of "staying home"? He's not going to stay home.
Data template. He finished. Beauty. Let me see if anyone's interacting in the chat.
D for data. D for data. D for data. Beauty.
Now look, look at this issue here. Read the following sentence : anyone can ride a bicycle.
The statement that corresponds to the negation.
And now I ask you, is he using "e" or "ou" so yes, then yes or no? Put a hashtag yes or a hashtag no in the chat for me.
You see in that sentence he's giving us, you see the "and," the "or," and the "yes." So, are you seeing any of these? Yes or no? Yes or no? No.
No, no. No. Exactly. So, look how you're learning to recognize patterns. You'll learn to interpret the question and it will start to make sense to your brain. You say: "Wait a minute, 'or' is one thing, 'si' is another. When you go to the kitchen to make rice, it's one recipe. You go to make beans, it's another recipe, but here he wants to make a cake, it's something else entirely.
So it's another recipe. Here he's starting the sentence with this little word here, look, 'any'.
Okay? So, let's learn this recipe to negate a sentence that starts with 'any', okay?
Grab your paper, grab your pen, because I'm going to teach you this, look.
Negation of 'any' which is synonymous with 'all'. Okay? So, if the sentence starts with 'any' or ' all', it's the same thing. So, it says : 'any teacher knows how to teach.' It's the same as 'all teachers know how to teach.' Okay? So, ' any' and 'all' are synonyms. When the exam board asks for the negation, pay attention to this here. When it asks for the negation, you must negate the sentence, just like we 've been doing. So, if you say, 'went to the movies,' you put 'didn't go to the movies.'
You know?" To teach, you put "doesn't know how to teach," you negate the sentence. But besides negating the sentence, you have to change this so-called quantifier. That little word "any" in "all" is a type of quantifier. Why? Because it assigns quantity, okay? So, when I say " every teacher knows how to teach," I'm not saying it's a teacher who knows 3 or 4, I'm saying all of them. So it's a way of quantifying, that's why it's called a quantifier. You're going to replace it with another quantifier, which is our EPA. It's the EPA trick. It's the EPA recipe. Creeper. What is EPA? It's "there is at least one" or " at least one." Okay? Bring it closer here. Wait a minute. So, look, it's the EPA trick. Put it here, look. EPA.
Okay? So it's "there is," " at least one," and "some."
You can use any of these.
Any of these is the EPA trick.
So you're going to replace "any" or " all," take it out and put "there is at least one" or "at least one."
One. It doesn't matter. Okay? You can't put "none." That's a trick question. In our daily lives, look. Everyone who studies passes. What's the opposite of that?
Nobody who studies passes. Wrong. You don't replace "all" with "none." Don't do that. Whoever does that is using everyday logic. That's not the rule. The rule is: there is at least one or some.
Okay? Example.
Example. Every Brazilian likes soccer.
What's the negation of that sentence?
No Brazilian likes soccer. That's wrong. This trick question comes up a lot in exams. Replacing "all" or "any" with " none." Don't do that. You don't replace " all" with "none." Use the trick. It's the EPA trick. Replace "all" with any of these. It doesn't matter. They're all correct. You'll look at the alternative to see which one the exam board chose to use, but they're all correct. I'll, as an example, take "some."
So it will become "some Brazilian," they don't want to negate it, so " likes" becomes what? "Doesn't like." "Some Brazilian doesn't like."
Football?
It could be. Are there Brazilians who don't like football? At least one Brazilian doesn't like football. All of that is correct. Okay? So you negate the sentence, see? "Likes" becomes "doesn't like" and you change the quantifier. " All" or "any" becomes "there is at least one."
OK? So that's the trick. That's the law of parole. Let's look at the little question here. "Anyone knows how to ride a bicycle."
I'm going to remove "anyone" and put "there is at least one" or "some." The only one that started correctly was letter B, from "bo," at least one. See? Letter A put "nobody," letter D put "everyone."
Letter E put "only one," it's not just one, it's at least one, okay? And letter C did n't even put the quantifier there, right?
So, notice here, "anyone" became " at least one," and we negate the sentence: "Knows how to ride a bicycle." The negation doesn't know how to ride a bicycle. Answer B, from " bola." OK? So, let's organize the idea. Look, pay attention.
Negations.
Negations.
Negation of "and" and "or". What is the law? It's the law of "baby".
Negation of "yes". So, what is the law? It's the law of "fool".
Negation of "all".
What is the law? It's the law of "hey".
And I'll tell you right now, if he gives me "hey", you're going to put "all", okay? "All" or "any" is synonymous, okay?
So, if "there exists at least one" and " some" becomes "all", "all" becomes "there exists at least one in some". So you're always going to swap "all" or " any" and you're going to put "hey". Remembering what is "hey"? They are the initials of the three possibilities. There exists at least one and some. But you can't forget to negate the sentence. He's asking for negation, okay? So we negate the sentence and change the beginning of it. "All" becomes "there exists at least one" or "some". "There exists at least one and some" becomes "all". Okay? So, "baby", " fool" are the laws of connectives. "And" or " yes", so "hey" and "all" are the laws.... of quantifiers, but all of this is within negation. The exam board will ask you for the negation. Let's look at another one here. This one came up in the Banco do Brasil exam, okay? An older Banco do Brasil exam. Uh, a newspaper published the following headline: every Banco do Brasil branch has a staff shortage. Given this untruth, blah blah blah blah, it wants the negation of that. That's it.
Negation of "all". I'm going to replace "all" with "there is at least one" or "some".
Letter C used "some". And letter D used " there is". Perfect. So it can only be letter C or letter D.
Now I'm going to negate the sentence. If it says " has a staff shortage", what is the negation of "has a shortage"? "There is no shortage".
Answer: Letter C. That's it.
Letter D. It started out right, but then it got lost, right? "branches with a staff shortage do not belong to Banco do Brasil". It belongs, when you look at the sentence that's in the... The statement doesn't have anything to do with belonging there.
He's inventing words, okay? You're not going to invent the word, you're just going to negate it. If he said there is a deficit, there is no deficit. Okay? That's it. That's all.
Answer: C. Let me check the chat. Talk to me, guys. Looking at it this way, automating, knowing which rule to use, doesn't it become much faster to learn logical reasoning? Put it in the chat for me. Does n't it become faster to learn logical reasoning? No beating around the bush, straight to the point, okay? Look at this other one here. There are insects that are not black. So he put "exists" and he put "are not black."
OK? So, what is the negation of "exists"? " Exists," "exists" is part of the EPA.
Here, look, "exists" is part of the EPA.
So, we're going to replace it with "all" or " any," it doesn't matter. So, option A put "none." Option B put "all," and option C put "all." Option D put " none." And option E put "not all," there's no " that." No, it's the whole thing. So it can only be letter B for ball or letter C.
OK? Now I change the quantifier and negate the phrase: "They are not black." The negation of "is not black" becomes what? "Is black." Answer: Letter B for ball.
Okay, Felipe. It could be "all insects are black." It could. It could be in the plural, but he wanted to put it in the singular, no problem, okay? So, they are not black. The opposite of what is not black is black. Okay? Letter C put: "All black animals are insects." " Black animals." I'm not talking about black animals, I'm talking about insects. The sentence in the problem statement doesn't have the word "animal" in it, it's only talking about insects, okay? That was the mistake in option C.
Let me see if everyone got it right.
Answer B is perfect. Let me see if everyone got it right. B B B B B B B B B.
Okay. Let's see another one here. The negation of the sentence.
There is a student in the math class who didn't study for the test. So he's putting "there is" and saying that he didn't study. See? So let's go. He asks for the negation.
The negation of "there is," we know what " the whole" is. So, option A, he put "the whole." Perfect. Option B put "there is." Option C put "none." Option D put " there is." Option E put "all." So, it can only be option A or option E. Okay?
So I replace it with "the whole," but I have to negate the sentence. If he's saying he didn't study, what is the opposite of "not"? Did he study? He studied.
Our answer is A. All the students in the math class studied for the test. So, if he said he didn't study, they did n't study, it will become studied, they studied. Perfect. So, the answer is A. So, when we know the model, we know the rule, we automate the process. Then, any question that comes up like this, you solve it quickly. You just need to know what you need to highlight in the statement. In this case, what do we have to highlight? The negation. And it's the negation of what? Negation of "exists". Oops.
Negation of "exists" becomes "everything". Ah, if it's the negation of "all", it becomes "exists". If it's the negation of "and" and "or", it's "baby". If it's the negation of "yes", then it's "fool". And then you already know what to do when faced with the question. You interpret faster, you learn faster. Perfect.
Guys, I now have some news for you, a surprise for you who are here with me at this moment, okay? Who here would like to have my How can I teach you logical reasoning in this way? I'm teaching you logical reasoning quickly and objectively, presenting these concepts of how to interpret and what to do when faced with a question in a very practical way. You saw that I didn't waste hours and hours explaining. I already took the question and brought you what you needed to answer it correctly in a very practical way. If you don't have time to study, you already have a test scheduled, and you need practical, objective guidance without wasting hours and hours studying, just send me a #sam in the chat.
If you need this direction, if you need this more specific, targeted, and faster guidance to learn logical reasoning, and I'll even give you a spoiler: learn everything that's most important in logical reasoning in two weeks of study. [laughs] Felipe, what's that? Yes, with just one hour of study a day, you can learn the most important aspects of logical reasoning in just two weeks.
You're committed to your success, and in just two weeks, studying one hour a day... Just so you know, you learn the most important aspects of logical reasoning and learn how to ace this subject. No more wasting months and months and months, right? Some people take a year, two years to learn in a practical, objective way. In just two weeks, one hour a day, you learn the most important aspects of logical reasoning. Put the hashtag in the chat. Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes.
Perfect.
So here, pay attention, okay?
What I did to help those of you who need to learn logical reasoning quickly, because you have little time to study, the exam is sometimes already scheduled, or depending on your daily life and commitments, you unfortunately don't have that much time to study. So what did I do? I recorded what's called intensive logical reasoning, which is exactly what you saw here. I took the most important aspects of logical reasoning and presented it in a very practical, objective way so you can accelerate your learning. And I included everything. In 30 lessons of 30 minutes each. 30 lessons of 30 minutes. 30 lessons of 30 minutes. That's 15 hours. In other words, practically two weeks studying one hour a day. Or Felipe, no, I only want to study 30 minutes a day. Then in a month, 30 days, 30 minutes, you'll finish our intensive course. Or if you want to speed things up to just one hour a day, in two weeks you'll practically finish it, because it's 15 hours of very direct, to-the-point lessons, with exercises, with what you need, what 's most important nowadays in public service exams. That's our intensive logical reasoning course, okay?
To access our intensive logical reasoning course, the investment today is R$ 197.
But besides that, I know that many of you have busy lives, so many of you only have time to study on weekends, because during the week it ends up being hectic. So what did I do to help? Last year I recorded our logic course. Logically, two months in two days. What people used to take two months to learn, I took a weekend and recorded on a Saturday and Sunday, okay? In two days I recorded an even more concise course, a course of only 8 hours, bringing you, who sometimes want to take a weekend off, send your husband to his mother-in-law's house, send your wife to her mother-in-law's house too, to dedicate just one weekend, an intensive Saturday and Sunday, okay? So that you can study what is most important in logical reasoning. And I will also release to you this logical reasoning training, two months in two days, which is even faster for you to learn. In one weekend you study what is most important. And this logical reasoning training, two months in two days. Today the investment to enter this training to have access to these classes, this ultra-intensive, let's say, today is R$ 127, okay?
And in addition, so that you can have everything mapped out for you of what is most important in logical reasoning, I I'm not going to give you access to the logical reasoning mind maps, which I want to share with you quickly. Look here, the mind maps like this. See? Organized for you in this way you see here. See what we just saw? The negation of the whole, the negation of some. See here? Everything organized for you here, with questions. Look, the negations we studied here, the baby, the fool, here.
So, here you can still learn logical reasoning in a very visual way. So, these logical reasoning mind maps today have an investment of R$ 97.
So, to accelerate your learning, I decided to release these three training courses for you: our intensive training, which is a 15-hour course, our two-month-in-two-day logical reasoning training, which is an ultra-fast 8-hour course, and these [snoring] mind maps so that you can... There's still material there so you can review the content. If you were to buy all three of these training courses to learn ultra-fast logical reasoning and get approved quickly, it would cost R$ 421.
But I've decided to do something very special that you won't believe, but it's a limited-time offer. So you need to take advantage of it quickly. From R$ 421 it will be only R$ 97.
Felipe, I can't believe it. R$ 97 for all of this. Yes, all of this. And you can even pay in 12 installments. If you want to pay in 12 installments, it's 12 installments of R$ 10.61.
Okay? If you pay in installments, you'll see there's a small surcharge because of the credit card company.
But the cash price is R$ 97, or practically R$ 10 per month, guys, so you can greatly accelerate your learning in logical reasoning, okay? You have a 7-day guarantee and all of this will be available to you for a year, okay? Okay? The mind map, of course you'll download it, and since it's a PDF, it will be yours forever, the mind map, but the video lessons from the intensive course, the " reasoning in two months in two days" course, will be available for a year, which is enough time. If you stop for a weekend, you can watch the "reasoning in two months in two days" course. If you stop for two weeks, an hour a day, you can watch the intensive course. So, a year is more than enough time for you to watch the course as many times as you want during that year.
Perfect, guys? Now, pay attention here.
I'm also going to give you an option.
I know many of you will be taking exams that include logical reasoning, but also math. So you can upgrade and add math as well, okay? Our math intensive course is R$197.
And besides this intensive course, remember I told you at the beginning of today's class that I have a training program called "Subzero Math," where I help you eliminate blocks in learning math. I I'll teach you how to study logical reasoning in mathematics. This Subzero math training has an investment of R$127.
So, these two trainings would cost R$324.
But you can also get these two trainings together for an additional R$97.
So, if you pay in installments, it's 12 installments of R$ 10.61.
Okay? So, R$10 there, plus R$10 here, will be R$20, actually R$21 practically, okay? R$21 per month gets you the intensive logical reasoning training and the intensive math training, okay? How do you get both? I'll show you now on the screen. I'm giving you our link now, okay?
Let me put it here in the chat for you.
Wait a minute.
Where's our chat?
Look, how do I make this payment? There it is. The link has just been pinned to the chat, okay? Pay attention. Here's what I'm going to show you. You 'll get here, the link has just been pinned here. It's pinned here. Then you 'll click on this link, click, this page will open, okay? Then you fill in your information here. Pay attention, check your email, okay?
Because your access will be via email.
Check it. If you're paying by credit card, it says here, "Oh, I don't have that limit on my credit card." You can use two credit cards, you can pay by Pix, by bank slip, it's all here for you. Now, pay attention. If you want to include math, just click on this little square you see down here, see? Then you see here, that it will be the logical reasoning plus math, okay? Then it will be 10.61 for the logical reasoning monthly fee plus 10.61 for the math monthly fee. No, I don't want math, so just do n't click on this little square here, okay? You fill it in. Enter your information and proceed with the purchase. Now, I advise you, I think it's really worth it, for just R$ 10 more per installment you can get the intensive math training, the math training from zero, where I help you, I teach you how to study math. So, click on this little square here so you can get the math training too, okay? The link is available in the chat, you just need to register, okay? I'll also ask my team to put it in the video description, okay? But you can find it in the link. I'll finish by putting it in the description myself, okay? But it's already in the chat. The link is already in the description too, okay?
It's in the description and it's also pinned in the chat. Okay? Another thing, Felipe, I still have a question about the training.
I'll show you the training here, okay? But if you have any questions about the training, you can talk to my team right now via WhatsApp, okay?
prepconcursos.com.br/matrícula is the second link in the description. Or you can type prepconcursos.com.br/matrípula.
You'll be redirected to WhatsApp. Then you talk to my team, saying: "Hey, I'm watching Professor Felipe's live stream, and I have a question about the training, like this, like that, and so on." My team will be able to help you, okay? So, go to prepconcursos.com.br/matrícula and you will be redirected to WhatsApp. Now, while you're registering, I want to show you the training right here. This is our intensive course on logical reasoning. So, notice that there are 13 modules here, okay? We have 13 modules. Now, each module has one or two lessons. Very straightforward here, logical propositions. Clicked, look, two lessons on logical proposition here, look. Two classes here, just two classes. See?
That issue has already been settled. Then you come back, you're back.
Next topic here, look. Connective.
Clicked. This one here is the tallest.
There are three, okay? Three lessons here, look.
Perfect. And look here, 30- minute classes, look. This one here, 28 minutes, see? So, three more classes here. This is the most extensive module, a module of three short lessons, okay? If you're going to go to the next one here, see, truth table, three more lessons here. So, it's all like this, one, two, or three classes at most, okay? Showing you everything here in a very objective way, okay? Okay, if we get here, look, let's take, for example, a logic diagram here, see, just two more lessons, you see? Everything is very practical. Let's move on to another topic here. There's enough material here for just one lesson. Take these, uh, look, these mind maps are here.
Mind map, then. Click here and download the mind map I showed you. Let's download the mind map here.
It opened. Here's a map, all neatly organized for you. Felipinho is cool over there, look. See what my team did? With a question, with a comment.
Here, look. Look at the material here for the mind map. Okay, perfect. But we also have, let me go back, look. If I look here, Ana, there's this interpretive logical reasoning that I did n't even tell you about, which is a bonus to the mask I'm giving you, which is teaching [clearing throat] you how to interpret logical reasoning, okay? So, if we go into this, truth and lies, the truth and lies problem, that's the last lesson, lesson 30. There are 30 lessons, you see? So, this module only has one lesson. So, that's 30 half-hour classes. So, in 15 days, studying one hour a day, you'll master those topics, okay? And you know what's cool? Click here. Oh, do you want to see?
I'm going to click here. This part about equivalence here is where we have the negations that we studied today, right?
Here it is. There are three short classes here, okay? So, you know what you can do? See here? This symbol up here.
When you click, you can ask a question here. Okay? He is our 24-hour tutor.
It's an artificial intelligence that I developed, that I trained, and that responds exactly as I would.
Your question will be answered immediately. Want to see?
Explain the negation of the conjunction "e" (and), oh, I asked the question here, oh.
It explains the negation of the connective "and."
Then he'll think for 10 seconds and he 'll answer you the same way I would, okay?
Here it is. Oh, he's speaking here. Nega, nega, que é aquele macexete do nenêm, né? Oh, deny it, deny it, and change the 'e' to 'ou'.
Oh, negate the first one, negate the second one, change the "e" to "ou". See? And then he comes here and even brings you an example, look. Joana went on a trip and Pedro stayed home. The negation: Joana didn't travel or Pedro didn't stay home. Here it is. Would you like to see more examples? So your question will be answered right here.
Perfect. Okay, Felipe. And what about mathematics? I want the math included.
I want the math involved too.
Wait a minute. The math is right here. The math is right here. Natural numbers. I'll teach you here. MC MDC. This section on rational numbers has a lesson here. Come back here. We have one lesson where I teach you about decimals and another lesson where I teach you about fractions. So I'll teach you how to do calculations with fractions, calculations with decimals, it's right here. Okay? So I'll bring up your basic math skills in our intensive math course. Let me come back here, okay? Here you also have the rule of three, you have percentages, look, access it here, percentages, a little lesson, a little lesson where I bring you the most important things about percentages, okay? Well, here at the end we have, look, the Subzero math, that training I mentioned where I teach you how to study math.
So, I'm going to click here. And here we have it, look, learn how to study. See here? Learn how to study. So, I'll show you here in this lesson, look.
Come back here. Where? Where? Here, look.
Here, look.
Why do you... What are your thoughts, what are your feelings about mathematics? What's stopping you from learning this subject? So, it's a training method that helps me eliminate those traumas. This difficulty, this fear of mathematics, the growth mindset, how to deal with failure, mistakes, and the effort you have to put in when studying mathematics, okay? Here's how to learn math and interpret problems, how to interpret a problem, mathematical literacy. So, I'll teach you the basics of math, okay? Here, look.
It's OK? So, all of this is to help you. Let me grab the material here, because I want to show it to you. This material is really cool.
No other course in Brazil has this. Just ours here, look. All your supplies are neatly organized, just for you! Okay, write down everything you've ever heard about the negative in math here, okay? I'm going to tell you how to develop the right mindset for learning, based on the MSET book, okay? She's an American researcher who developed this, and I'm bringing it to you, okay? I'll give examples of people who have already learned math but had a lot of difficulty. Everything to show the pyramid of the competitive exam taker. People love a pyramid-shaped learning method I developed, which ensures you learn correctly for competitive public service exams. Guys, all this for the price I'm offering, no, you won't find anything better. [laughs] So, click there, secure your registration, and if you want to talk to me or my team, it's right there: preponcos.com.br/matrícula.
Okay, guys? Let me check the chat. I'm already in.
Beauty.
Yeah, I already went there on WhatsApp. [laughter] Let's go. I'm waiting for you inside the training area. I'm in. I'm in, I'm in. Awesome, guys. So, that's what I had planned for today, okay? Hey, now come and be part of our intensive course in logical reasoning, our intensive course in mathematics. I'll take you by the hand and help you overcome your difficulties with math and science. And if you want to talk to me or my team, it's right here: prepconcursos.com.br/matrícula.
I'll see you now in the first class of our training. A big hug to you, and I'll leave you now with some videos of students who passed public service exams, because I'm sure that soon you'll be sending a video telling your success story, telling about your passing the public service exam, because if they, who had difficulties, succeeded with our help, you can too. A big hug, and I'll see you inside our intensive course.
Thanks, everyone. I went.
I managed to pass three competitive exams, and that made all the difference in my life, you know?
For people of all ages, who want to start over, who want to study, I think it 's a great opportunity.
I passed the exam in '58 for judicial technical clerk in the capital and today I'm already here, even working, I even have my badge, super happy about it and eternally grateful to Professor Felipe.
Right now I'm focusing on police careers. I recently took the Moreno Municipal Guard exam and scored 72 points. I qualified, and because of that I dedicated myself, studied hard, and victory was certain.
Third place in the Minas Gerais state competition for special education, administered by FGV. So, today I am a tenured teacher in the state of Minas Gerais, thanks to you, teachers.
So I bought the complete course.
The pre-exam preparation was truly crucial for me to pass. I came in third place in the SEM exam and I'm studying for the Correios exam with the goal of passing it. That's it, buy the course, it's very good, very didactic and excellent.
I am currently living in the city of Rancharia, in the interior of São Paulo, because I was selected for a position I won in a competition last November. I assumed the position on March 25th. My experience was very positive, I highly recommend it. Now I want to resume my studies and I will study using the Preponcos platform.
I decided to take the Minas Gerais civil service exam. others and they all had math and I passed them all. The math test had five logic questions, and I got all five of them right. The confidence I gained in mathematics and logical reasoning through prior exam preparation gave me the ability to tackle any exam that came my way. See?
Related Videos
Olympiad Mathematics | Indian | Can You Solve This One?
PhilCoolMath
650 views•2026-06-03
Escaping the Fog
LogicLemurGaming
760 views•2026-06-03
A Brutal Radical Expression Made Easy! The Shortcut Changes Everything.
tamoshop
112 views•2026-06-02
V : jee main /advance class 11 mathematics : Binomial Theorem class-1 ( 29 may 2026 )
dcamclassesiitjeemainsadva9953
125 views•2026-05-29
Is This Pentomino Tileable?
3cycle
241 views•2026-05-30
This Sudoku Has Many Lines!!
CrackingTheCryptic
2K views•2026-05-29
Olympiad Mathematics | Indian Can You Solve This One?
PhilCoolMath
268 views•2026-06-02
Olympiad Mathematics | Indian | Can You Solve This?
PhilCoolMath
669 views•2026-06-02











