The Pushback IS Working, BUT We Are FAR From Done!! BILL C-22

Hinzugefügt: 2026-05-30

[00:00:10]What is up LADIES AND GENTLEMEN AND BEAUTIFUL PEOPLE OF THE CRASHER COMMUNITY? HOW ARE YOU GUYS DOING? TODAY we're back with a new VIDEO ON THE CHANNEL. Thank you very much for tuning on in, you absolute legends. It has been god knows how long since I have last opened up my videos with the typical intro. How you guys all doing on this BEAUTIFUL NIGHT? SO, WHAT WE HAVE HERE IS a little bit of a follow-up in regards to the whole situation revolving around Bill C22.

[00:00:40]And let me tell you something, it feels so damn good to see more people and more companies pushing back against these type of bills, these type of laws that are invasive to your online safety and privacy. So, let's get into this, shall we? Government considering amendments to Bill C-22 amid backlash from tech civil liberties groups. Government considering amendments. Well, actually, government, here's something to consider. How about you abolish the idea of Bill C-22?

[00:01:13]Problem solved. After significant push back from prominent tech companies, the federal government says it will consider amendments to its controversial bill C-22, WHICH WOULD GIVE LAW enforcement and CEUS more tools to surveil Canadians online activity. Now, I also want you guys to bear this in mind as well. These bills/laws are very similar to age/ID verification.

[00:01:40]And one of those big-time similarities involves the invasion of your online privacy. But of course, you're going to have the powers that be in Congress attempt to lie to you, attempt to sell you on that Kool-Aid that they want you to drink, attempting to sell you on that snake oil they're trying to put OUT BY SAYING, "OH, IT'S TO PROTECT CITIZENS.

[00:02:02]OH, it's to protect the kids." We know up and down the boards that is 100% [ __ ] It is all about control. and you can't say otherwise. And um aren't laws like these unconstitutional? Or rather, if you're Canadian, this right here goes against the Charter of Rights, more specifically section 8, our right to be protected from unlawful seizures of our privacy. Public Safety Minister Gary, with a last name I can't pronounce, so I'm just going to call you Gary A. hope that is sufficient. Said on Wednesday that the federal government is considering amendments to Bill C22, the proposed legislation that would give law enforcement backdoor access to data and expand how long companies store user metadata, including language that he said will better protect endtoend encryption and to compensate telecom companies for changes they may be asked to implement. Yeah, I'm just going to let you know that anytime the word backdoor gets thrown around in this conversation, just know that this doesn't spell out anything good. Because why would you want to do things in the way of backdoor if you guys are thinking that this is on the up and up? If you guys are thinking that this is perfectly okay, that this is perfectly lawful. H the proposed amendments to the bill come after pressure campaigns from tech companies like Apple, Google, and Meta.

[00:03:29]civil liberties organizations and the Federal Privacy Commissioner who were among those that testified at a public safety committee meeting on the matter on Tuesday. During that meeting, opponents outlined concerns that the legislation could weaken encryption, facilitate foreign interference, expose vulnerable privacy architecture to dismantling, and that the legislation goes further than its contemporaries in other jurisdictions. And uh not to mention going against our rights to our safety and privacy as well. Like has it ever occurred to any of these [ __ ] goons upstairs that we have a right to protect our personal identifiable information online? Wall A said he is open to some changes on the bill's language specifically regarding encryption. He said he would not budge on stipulations requiring internet companies to retain user metadata for up to a year. That point has been contentious with privacy commissioner Phipe Defense, hope I'm saying that right, testifying that the longer you keep information, the more there's a risk in terms of privacy breach. And how many times have we spoken about on the channel privacy/data breaches? I'm pretty sure we've spoken about that a few times. And every time we've spoken about these breaches/data hacks, countless amounts of people's private information has been leaked and exposed and uh powers that be the powers upstairs in Canada. I hope you realize that that right there is a very real and valid threat. Like do you guys even think any of this through? Seriously, do you guys even think before you speak?

[00:05:14]Because let me tell you something. This right here is not going to be a benefit to your citizens. It might be a benefit to y'all cuz you know what? At the end of the day, that's what y'all care about, right? WHAT YOU GUYS WANT. YOU DON'T care about what your people want.

[00:05:30]The very people that depend on your leadership to keep the country going.

[00:05:35]Let me spell it out for you in a very, very simple way. This right here is not going to be a benefit for your Canadian citizens. As a matter of fact, with all of the things that we have spoken on so far with Bill C22, with age/ID verification, with online safety act, like all that [ __ ] crap, I'm here to tell you that this right here is going to pose more of a danger, more of a risk to your citizens than anything else. Oh, but we're not done yet. We actually get to the best [ __ ] part. A has also implied that the complaints coming from tech are hypocritical. We're living in a world where big tech, whether it is Apple, Google, or the range of other big tech companies, are operating without any type of accountability, without any type of protection of privacy, he said to reporters in Ottawa on Wednesday, according to the Globe and Mail. Wow, that's a keeper right there, folks.

[00:06:37]Also, who are you to try and call out other tech companies for supposed hypocrisy when you are the one that's in support of Bill C22 IN THE FIRST PLACE?

[00:06:48]YOU HAVE ABSOLUTELY zero room or right to get up on your [ __ ] soap box and preach down like somehow you're above all of this. YOU'RE A [ __ ] SCHMUCK.

[00:07:00]YOU ARE A con artist. Sit down and shut up. And also, let's unpack the word accountability a little bit here. seeing how you like to use that word to try and act like you're the almighty in this situation. You want to talk about accountability. OKAY. WELL, LET'S JUST SAY if Bill C22 gets enacted here. Okay.

[00:07:19]Let's say that we are living in a dystopian 1984 type of era where Bill C22 is enacted. Okay. Well, what if we had our information breached, hacked, and made vulnerable? meaning that all of our information was hacked and out there for the world to see. Would you, the Canadian government, take accountability for that? Would you, the Canadian government, take responsibility for that? No, you wouldn't. You would be sitting there making excuses. While critiques of the bill have centered on privacy, security, and government overreach, the feds have argued that increased surveillance capability is necessary to combat security threats and criminal behavior online. Oh my goodness. Like I just don't understand like just why they keep on trying to make these excuses when they are so easy to be seen through. Like we see through you like you're a [ __ ] empty shot glass. Okay? Like, you're not fooling anybody with this. Like, look, I get the fight against security threats and criminal behavior online and this that and the other. Okay? That's why you go after the [ __ ] actual sources of that [ __ ] instead of making a law that blankets over everybody. All of the innocent civilians that have to put up with this, that have to put up with their information being in some database where all it takes is one good hack and all of their [ __ ] [ __ ] is out there for the world to see. Uh-uh. We're not falling FOR THAT. LIKE ONE OF THE biggest things that I absolutely hate about dynamics like these is how much of a copout this really is. Rather than the powers that be putting in the effort as well as the money and the resources, all of which we know they have to go after these threats directly. They are choosing the easy way. They are choosing the chicken [ __ ] way. They are enacting a bill that is invasive of our rights and privacy, but they're trying to shoehorn in all of these [ __ ] excuses to try and justify themselves.

[00:09:31]Like, if you care that much about combating security threats and combating online criminal behavior, go after the sources directly. Stop trying to screw over every single citizen that has absolutely nothing to do with this [ __ ] and all they want to do is just enjoy some [ __ ] online content on YouTube.

[00:09:50]Proponents and opponents remain split with defense calling on the government to narrow the scope of what can be disclosed and those who could be compelled to provide said information.

[00:10:01]In an earlier committee meeting, law enforcement argued in favor of increasing the legislation scope with calls to retain metadata for even longer periods than initially proposed, claiming privacy concerns were overstated. And there it is. Not only is that another keeper right there, but that right there, plain as day, clear and simple. They want to say that privacy concerns are overstated.

[00:10:30]That right there tells you everything that you need to know and more about what we're talking about here. Holy [ __ ] Corruption much? Oh my goodness.

[00:10:42]In the House, opposition parties like the Block Quebec and Conservative Party of Canada have called for additional time to debate the bill. To date, Bill C22 has passed its first two readings in the House of Commons. Committee members had until Wednesday afternoon to submit amendments. Several security focused tech companies like Signal and NordVPN has stated that the bill C22 could trigger them to leave Canada. This week, Apple's director for user privacy and child safety refused to speculate on whether Apple would follow suit. With the government still refusing to budge on some of the bill's more contentious components, it is unclear if amendments will be broad enough to change the minds of opponents, businesses, and the public. And that right there is also another big fact to be reminded of here.

[00:11:33]Should Bill C22 actually be enacted, we could very well see a massive exodus, at least as far as technological companies go. So, Signal, NordVPN, you know, Apple, things like that. They could very well be dipping out of Canada should Bill C22 actually be an official thing.

[00:11:52]But I'll tell you one thing, we cannot ease up on the gas when it comes to our push back against Bill C22. This, simply put, cannot be a thing for Canada. cuz if it is well say goodbye to your privacy and your rights and welcome to 1984.

[00:12:12]>> So the companies that are coming forth and saying talking about privacy, talking about privacy protection, talking about vulnerabilities better step up and provide their path to how they're protecting the privacy rights of Canadians.

[00:12:24]>> Do you believe tech companies are misinforming Canadians on this bill?

[00:12:26]>> I believe there's a number of um areas of misinformation.

[00:12:29]>> And that's Gary, by the way. That's the Gary that we had mentioned in this video. And holy [ __ ] this guy is an absolute schmuck with negative IQ. I have absolutely no idea how something like that managed to get into Canadian Parliament. Like, it's so amazing how somebody so delusional and so negative IQ can stand up there as if he's God's greatest gift to our country, stand on his soapbox, and preach it down even though he has absolutely no idea what the [ __ ] he's talking about. Like, Mr. Gary, maybe, just maybe, if I could be afforded to recommend this to you, maybe don't throw stones seeing how you live in a glass house with a GLASS MOUTH.

[00:13:16]LIKE, I CAN'T say this enough, guys. If Bill C22 actually gets enacted in full in Canada, say goodbye to your freedom.

[00:13:25]Say goodbye to your online privacy. You are essentially going to be subject to wearing a digital ankle monitor. And when something happens to you, when your [ __ ] gets leaked online, well, guess what? That right there is the consequences of the very policies revolving around Bill C-22. Like at this point, this goes well beyond a political issue. This is a human issue, okay? This isn't about being liberal. This isn't about being conservative. I don't give a [ __ ] about politics, okay? I don't care if you're left, right, up, down, inside out, upside down. WHO GIVES A [ __ ] about all of that? This right here is going to seriously hurt your human rights, your right to your privacy online, your right to your safety online. Like it's not just going to be a big time blow to your human rights, but this right here is going to be the death nail in the coffin when it comes to your right to your privacy and safety online. I cannot say this enough, guys. So, I urge you guys to keep spreading these videos around.

[00:14:32]Whoever are making these type of videos calling out Bill C22 or anything adjacent to this for that matter, spread them far and wide to any platforms you can. And if you are comfortable with doing so, make your own videos discussing these. I highly encourage it.

[00:14:49]OR AT LEAST at bare minimum, contact your local representatives and tell them about these issues. Okay? These issues are not going to go away until we fight it and beat it into the ground to a permanent end. So, I'll leave that video there. Thank you very much for watching and please take care of yourselves,