Harry & Meghan Circus: Was MEGXIT Created By The UK Government Under The Fusion Doctrine?

本站添加: 2026-05-30

[00:00:06]This is your daily dose of all things royal.

[00:00:11]Literally every day it feels like I'm always stumbling upon a piece of information that sends me down these rabbit holes. So yesterday I put up this post about Imran Ahmed's lawsuit against the United States and his lawyers response back referencing this CITR group that we've talked about in a previous video that's connected to Harry and Megan. And in the comment section was a comment from the account CCDH Watch, which I highly suggest if you're not following on X, you do so because they do a lot of good investigative work around these nonprofits and who they're connected to as well as following the money. So, I highly suggest go check it out. But in this case, they had left a comment telling me to check out Fusion Doctrine, which I never heard of before until yesterday. And yeah, that's the rabbit hole that I have gone down and we definitely need to talk about it because it is tied to Harry and Megan. So this fusion doctrine was introduced in March of 2018 as part of the UK government's national security capability review under the prime minister Terresa May and national security adviser Mark Sedwell.

[00:01:29]Now the core idea of this doctrine was that modern threats such as cyber warfare, terrorism, economic coercion, disinformation, and geopolitical competition could no longer be handled by separate government departments working in isolation. Instead, this doctrine aimed to fuse all of those instruments together of national power, diplomatic, military, economic, intelligence, technological, developmental, and even private, public sector capabilities. And they put this all into a single coordinated strategy directed by the National Security Council. It emphasized that crossgovernment accountability with senior officials assigned responsibility for major security priorities and sought to make strategy more integrated, agile, and long-term. So, building off of the World Economic Forum's lingo as whole of society, they coined the term whole of government as an approach to solving complex global threats. Some critics argued it was partly a rebranding of older coordination ideas and risk becoming bureaucratic management jargon rather than a truly new strategic model.

[00:02:47]Now, one of the things that's really important to understand here is that Markx Edwell's fusion doctrine represented and emphasized that this strategy attempt to treat influence itself as a core instrument of national security rather than as something separate from defense or foreign policy.

[00:03:07]This doctrine assumed that geopolitical competition in the 21st century would increasingly happen below the threshold of open war through information campaigns, economic leverage, cyber activity, media narratives, sanctions, development aid, trade relationships, cultural influence and strategic partnerships. And under this framework, British embassies, intelligence agencies, military planners, trade officials, development programs, and communications teams were expected to coordinate around shared strategic objectives. So using soft power assets such as the BBC World Service who's also funded by USID or was funded by USAD, the British Council, universities, financial networks in London, foreign aid and diplomatic alliances were viewed not just as cultural or humanitarian tools, but as instruments that could reinforce Britain's global influence and resilience against adversarial narratives And who better to put into the mix would be soft power assets like the royals because essentially that's what they're used for. So now that you understand the premise of this doctrine, let's look at the guy who created it.

[00:04:32]His name is Mark Zedwell. In an interview with the UK government in 2019, Mark Zedwell pretty much shows us that he's just another one of these piece of [ __ ] globalists. So the question here, what experience and insight from your previous roles in the diplomatic service and as home office permanent secretary do you find yourself using now as cabinet secretary? So here is what was so special about Mark Sedwell. It's very rare or I want to say unusual that one person would simultaneously hold two of the most powerful positions in the British state.

[00:05:10]one is cabinet secretary and national security advisor. In the UK system, those particular roles had traditionally been separate to preserve institutional balance. The cabinet secretary is the top civil servant overseeing the functioning of government and coordination between departments while the national security adviser focuses on intelligence, defense, foreign policy, and strategic threats. By combining both of those offices under one guy in 2018, Theresa May effectively centralized strategic coordination across the entire government. And this mattered because the fusion doctrine depended on exactly this kind of centralized authority. So in understanding that his response is, "Mine is an unusual background for cabinet secretary, having spent much of my career overseas in security and international roles outside Westminster and Whitehal world. That helps me retain a sense of balance and perspective on the really big issues like the new global order." Let me say that again.

[00:06:20]Like the new global order continues on. technological change, population and climate movements, as well as the inevitable preoccupations of Brexit and the domestic economy. Now, I'm not going to go and read the whole thing, but in a nutshell, keep in mind this is early 2019 as Britain prepared to leave the European Union, which obviously after learning more about Brexit, the globalists absolutely didn't want that. And now they had to make do with this choice and ensure that Brexit was going to be successful. But underlying their sentiment was, you know, this is a threat to our globalist order because if they saw Brexit happen, then possibly other countries might say, you know what, we want to leave and this rise of populism was threatening this new world order. So there was a lot of criticism with saidwell holding these two top positions. But in this interview he framed the decision to retain the national security adviser role while heading the entire civil service as essential to make a success of Brexit.

[00:07:26]The mechanism was that he and the national security community called the fusion doctrine the deliberate fusing of all the national capabilities including economic, security, social and the rest with a genuine sense of teamwork across and beyond the government meaning beyond keeping it with just the UK government.

[00:07:46]This was not merely administrative efficiency. It was a strategic necessity in a world of converging global forces.

[00:07:54]Technological disruption, mass population movements, and climate pressures were presented as structural realities demanding coordinated whole of system responses that transcended traditional departmental or even national silos. The beyond government that I mentioned earlier phrasing hinted at the need to align state power with broader networks. And that's important to understand here because he's really talking about international alliances, private sector capabilities, and transnational institutions. Now, keep in mind the timing of this interview. It was February 13th, 2019.

[00:08:35]Unbeknown to us at the time, these globalists were getting ready to ensure that Donald Trump did not get back into office in 2020, which included Harry and Megan. So now this quarterback essentially for the UK is in place. It's all hands on deck from a global perspective. It wasn't just the United Kingdom that was helping the United States out ensure that our election was stolen, but the United Kingdom played a significant part to this. And I think everybody is seeing how all roads are leading back to Obama. Where does Obama fit in here with this guy? Well, apparently when this guy was the UK ambassador to Afghanistan, he was also tied up with NATO and strategy with the Obama administration.

[00:09:18]You know, what's evidently clear here is that the UK and Europe as well as many people here in the United States like these forever wars because it is fueling economies. UK's economy, Europe's economy, and to a certain extent the United States. even though we're the ones giving our taxpayer money away. So, it goes back to not wanting this grift to stop. And they were fearful for Donald Trump getting back in a second term, then this new world order or the agenda 2030 would begin to collapse. So now when you look at Mark Sedwell's role essentially as the quarterback during his tenure as the UK's national security adviser literally for the whole Trump administration from 2017 to 2020 and cabinet secretary from 2018 to 2020 right in that sweet spot. Mark Sedwell advanced a national security strategy that was built around this concept of fusion. And part of that fusion or central to this fusion was the British Army's 77th brigade which is a specialized unit that was formed in 2015 to conduct information operations and non-lethal psychological warfare. The brigade focused on using social media and targeted information activities to counter myths and disinformation.

[00:10:45]Operating as part of the UK's broader hybrid warfare toolkit, Sedil championed the blending of these non-traditional methods with conventional military efforts, aiming to make Britain more proactive in the information domain space, otherwise trying to control narratives. Now, with that in mind, in Donald Trump's first term, he wasn't able to get the things that he wanted to see done for this country that we are seeing now happen. And this is because the globalists threw a wrench back into his plans by creating this whole Russia hoax, the Russia Russia Russia collusion. And that tied up a lot of time taken away from focusing on helping this country. Now, knowing what we know that the whole thing was a hoax, >> a scandal about Democrat projection, this is a scandal about what was a coup planned against the incoming administration at the highest levels.

[00:11:40]And and I can report here tonight that these declassifications that have come out, uh those weren't easy to get out and there's in fact far more waiting to get out. Unfortunately, uh those releases and declassifications, according to multiple sources I've talked to, are being blocked by CIA director Gina Haspel, who herself was the uh main link between Washington and London as the London station chief for John Brennan's CIA during the 2016 election. Recall it was London where Christopher Steel was doing all this work. And I'm told that it is Gina Haspel personally who's blocking uh continued declassification of these documents that will show the American people the truth of what actually happened.

[00:12:19]>> Gina Haspel was the director of the CIA from 2018 to 2021. Right in that window where she would have had to have worked with Mark Zedwell. So of course Mark Sedwell knew what was going on here. So just to drive this home so you can understand the role that this guy played. He was in charge of surveillance at GCHQ. He also was in charge of internal security at MI5. He also oversaw intelligence at MI6 and special branch and also had his finger on the germ warfare otherwise known as biocurity. In addition, he controlled the entire information flow to the cabinet, otherwise known as the political executive, the rapid response unit, otherwise known as the 77th brigade, and most importantly, the FCO, the Foreign Commonwealth Office, otherwise known as the Office of Diplomacy, you know, where they pull the royals from and send them off to do, you know, the so-called soft influence thing. And then you have much more of the soft power which is the media, you know, and the way that they shape the political environment. And and one of the things that that that this British elite have mastered and and you know, been masters of for decades is psychological warfare. You know, the way that they they shape narratives. This guy Shawn Davis, he was targeted by the London Miss and Disinformation Mafia that included media outlets as well as those NOS's like stop funding fake news and the CCDH for reporting on the George Floyd destruction. So getting back to this fusion doctrine, it was built on the idea that information and influence work should not remain confined to national government silos. Instead, it was meant to be woven into wider networks that stretch across borders and institutions like into the United States. One clear example of how this played out in practice is the movement of key personnel from official roles in London to influential policy circles abroad like in Washington DC. Andy Price, who previously led counter disinformation efforts inside the UK's Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office, made exactly this shift. He moved into a senior fellow position with the Democratic Resilience Program at the Center for European Policy Analysis, otherwise known as SEIPA in Washington.

[00:14:56]Now, if you don't know what SEIPA is, they function as a prominent transatlantic think tank that pushes for stronger coordination between NATO, the EU, and align governments on issues of information, hybrid threats, and public narrative control. Let me say that again, and public narrative control. Its work often supports more assertive responses to perceived adversarial influence, including greater integration of security thinking into everyday discourse and pressure on digital platforms to manage content more aggressively. So, what it boils down to really is that it was this [ __ ] guy, Mark Sedwell, was the quarterback to kicking off the UK's assault on the United States First Amendment. So now you understand who this guy is and what he is all about. Let's talk about Mexit.

[00:15:49]Out of all people to be a part of and involved with this [ __ ] show back in 2020, it was Mark Sedwell. Mark Sedwell played a major role in this Sandringham summit and agreement that came out that was fed to the public. Now, when we go back to this judgment that you're looking at right now, they have Mark Sedwell listed as cabinet secretary in 2020. He wasn't just cabinet secretary, he was also the national security adviser. Why did they not include that here in this document? I mean, wasn't this always about Harry's security and getting that back? My personal feeling is that this was always just to show.

[00:16:31]When you go back and you read this judgment, understanding the role that Mark said well played with the government at the time, it's highly possible that this was one giant narrative that was spun to get Harry and Megan over here to use some of that soft power. Remember, at the time, Harry and Megan were riding high. They were on top. When you go back and you look at this, you can see where there are gaps that have not been answered, that just don't make any kind of sense, as well as private conversations being held with no explanation of what was being discussed.

[00:17:04]The other thing that raised a red flag for me today was this part, bullet number 28. On January 13, Sir Richard Matram emailed blank to say that he had had a discussion by telephone with the cabinet secretary. pause. Another key player in the decision of Mexit was Sir Richard Matram. We never talked about him, but he was the chair of Rayback from 2009 to April 2021. He had previously been permanent secretary in the office of public service and science within the cabinet office, the ministry of defense, the department for the environment transport and the regions, the department for work and pensions and finally permanent secretary intelligence security and resilience and chair of the joint intelligence committee in the cabinet office. Now, what they're not telling you is that he has served in some of the UK's most influential government positions, including roles connected to intelligence and security oversight, where he worked to ensure that intelligence agencies operated effectively within established legal and governmental frameworks. He was very vocal with his public commentary and policy discussions as Matram had expressed concern about the challenges that myths and disinformation and declining trust in institutions posed to democratic societies. They were all so pissed off that Donald Trump was in office that it all became about myths and disinformation and securing the online space so it doesn't happen again.

[00:18:42]His work has generally emphasized strengthening government accountability, improving institutional resilience, and supporting evidence-based decisionmaking, and maintaining public confidence in democratic systems, like ensuring that Donald Trump never gets back into office again. He has also written and spoken about the difficulties governments face in a rapidly changing information environment, arguing that democratic institutions must adapt to new forms of influence and information warfare while preserving the principles of open government and public trust. Matram has spoken about the challenges associated with what he described as a post-truth political environment, declining trust in institutions and the growing influence of myths and disinformation.

[00:19:32]This was a guy who was chair of Rayback from 2009 to April of 2021. And it says here, "Sir Richard's first witness statement says that he has extensive experience of government across a wide range of policy areas and am very familiar with decision-making in matters of or touching on national security."

[00:19:53]Now that you understand a little bit of what this guy is about, let's go back to this judgment. So he's supposed to be the chair of RayAc with a special interest in protecting our democracy and restoring truth back into our institutions. Okay. Matram has a telephone conversation, not on record, but a telephone conversation with the cabinet secretary. And notice they're not naming him here, but it's Mark Sedwell who was planning to put in writing with the royal household the line he was taking on the security arrangements. Oh, you mean the narrative that everybody has to go on. In essence, this was that redacted. I commented that the royal household tended to see matters in redacted whereas we considered redacted. There might be circumstances where some state support was justified in the context say of redacted, but this was different to redacted. So, if this indeed was a covert mission, a lot of this redacted stuff could actually reveal what they really talked about. They're giving just enough information to make this look legit, but at the same time leaving things out, so it's still very murky.

[00:21:05]Anyway, bullet number 29. On January 16th, 2020, Fiona Mawim emailed Sir Mark Sedwell. She thanked him for the helpful conversation the two of them had had on January 15th. again another off therecord conversation on the telephone stating that she had faithfully relayed the details you had provided on security and finance tax exemptions to the Duke.

[00:21:29]So do we necessarily believe that this was what the conversation was about or do we believe this was the narrative being seated to give the optics that there really was a concern about security? I don't know something to think about. Let's go ahead and talk about Fiona for a second. She was appointed private secretary of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex in late 2019, right before the announcement of Mexit.

[00:21:54]So, just a little background in case you forgot, in 2009 at age 35, this woman was appointed British ambassador to Albania, making her one of the youngest ambassadors in modern British diplomatic history. She served until 2012 and then went on to be the director for the Western Balkans and enlargements at the FCO and held senior advisory roles with the European Commission. And somehow towards the end of 2019, Fiona Mim found her way as the private secretary of Harry and Megan just in time to deal with Mexit. And then what's really peculiar is that after Fiona's short stint with Harry and Megan, she landed a job at 10 Downing Street as private secretary for foreign affairs dealing with the prime minister and at the time it was Boris Johnson. She too also had a special interest in disinformation. In 2018, while serving as head of the Western Balkans and Enlargement Department at the FCO, she gave evidence to a UK parliamentary inquiry. She noted UK concerns about Russian disinformation in the region and confirmed that Britain was already coordinating with partners on how to counter it. So they want us to believe that this woman left being the head of the Western Balkans and Enlargement Department at the FCO to go and work for those two nitwits. Come on, folks. Come on. It should be noted that Fiona was awarded in 2024 a CMG in the 2024 King's Birthday Honors and it was for her role advising the prime minister on foreign policy. Could this award have anything to do with buying her silence?

[00:23:41]No, that's what I'm thinking. Another thing that I want to point out here is that at the time they were still referring to Harry and Megan as the principles, meaning working royals. You know, when you look back at the stories that we were fed about Harry and Megan fleeing the UK, like just picking up and leaving as if they are regular people like you and I that just can get into a car and go, you realize how ridiculous this whole entire story was. For a royal to just pack up and leave isn't something that like can be done in the flea of the night. You know what I mean?

[00:24:16]You know, the one thing that I always found so ridiculous was this narrative of Harry and Megan blindsiding the queen. Like they could just pick up and take off, you know, without anybody knowing. Like that's the most ridiculous narrative, but everybody bought it. And it kept us distracted for 8 years. Okay.

[00:24:36]For us to think that Harry and Megan didn't have affairs that they had to close off and that they did that themselves, you know, I'm sorry. You're royal. There's a lot of complexity there for you to just sever ties and go across the pond. You know, you can't just do that because you're a royal. You know, the rules are very different for them than for us. We we can just get into our cars and just take off and leave no trace behind. But these people can't.

[00:25:05]And they want us to believe that nobody knew what they were doing when they had all these advisers around them negotiating this magit. And come on, especially when everything is so murky and the story seems to change every so often on what really happened at the Sandringham summit. There's no like real transparency there. We would be so stupid to think that the queen didn't know what was going on. She knew. She knew. She didn't think that Harry and Megan would stay. I really do believe that this was just a short-term arrangement to ensure that Donald Trump didn't get back into office and that they were going to come right back.

[00:25:44]Bullet point 34 says a composed an email on January 28th recording what had been discussed under the heading UK government position. Sir Mark Sedwell was recorded as saying that blank would very likely result in blank, whatever that means. But Mark Sedwell is setting the narrative. He said it was very clear from the government's point of view blank. Okay, setting the narrative that would be the government's position even if the arrangement was in the nature of a fixedterm sabbatical. And right there it was always thought that it was going to be a shortterm situation. And now the next narrative is the government's advice would be for the claimant and his wife to contract a private security team which had the confidence of the Canadians as well as having a blank whatever that means. In my opinion, this is setting the narrative that Harry and Megan are paying for their own security as to not look at possibly the UK government could still be giving them security or knowing that the United States would be giving them some level of security. So you might say Harry and Megan came over to the United States during the first Trump administration and that is true. However, the deep state was actively trying to get him. So Trump may be like, "No, I'm not giving security." But would he know if people within the United States government in the deep state during his first term who were actively trying to undermine his presidency wouldn't give security to these two? Absolutely. especially if the Obama error is still embedded in some of these departments. Yeah, and we did see evidence that Harry and Megan were getting a level of security. Now, mind you, this was going on just as co hit.

[00:27:33]So, do you really think Donald Trump had time to worry about whether or not Harry and Megan were getting paid security by the US taxpayer? No. Because at the time there was a lot more going on. We had George Floyd protests. We had the Russia hoes. I mean, there was so much distraction getting in the way of the Trump administration actually doing the job for the American people that I highly doubt Harry and Megan security was on the top of the list to focus on.

[00:28:02]Yeah, I hate to break it to everybody, but there's absolutely no way that the Queen didn't know what these two were doing over here in 2020. I really do think she thought those two were going to come right on back. And what we watched in 2021 was Megan going rogue. I honestly believe that this is what happened. The queen knew in 2020 what needed to be done. All hands were on deck, folks. We're now starting to see and understand that the UK uses its soft power, meaning in the royal family to influence abroad. If that's how this was positioned to make sure that Biden got into office in 2020, you know, by trying to protect the integrity of the election with reducing myths and disinformation and stopping, you know, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, then obviously the queen was likely sold sold on the idea of protecting democracy. Now, by looking at this theory in this way, it makes sense as to why the royal family never did anything to curb these two, especially in 2020 when they were legitimately interfering with the 2020 election.

[00:29:07]Despite Congressman Jason Smith writing a letter saying that these two were interfering with the election and they didn't appreciate it, nothing was done, no response, no action was taken. You know, the final note that I'm going to leave you on here to just chew on, it really is frustrating to know, especially in your gut of guts, that you've been lied to, especially on such a massive scale, and these lies are still ongoing, especially around those two children. You know, in looking back, there were a lot of instances where the royal family could have cleared some of this stuff up, but they chose not to.

[00:29:45]And I don't think they ever will unless their back is up against the wall like what we saw with the you know release of the sleazy e files and they had to address you know Andrew's involvement here. I think a similar situation will have to happen you know being driven from the United States. I mean that's all we could hope for. It's getting really hard to go along with these narratives that we keep seeing in the media like, "Oh, how Harry and Megan are going broke or Megan's not going to go back to the UK or Harry has demands of his dad and he has one shot left to make amends." Like, this non-stop drama has been going on in the media for the last 8 years. There's no private citizens, normal citizens or celebrity that could pull this off at such a scale. Which is why it makes more sense that this has been some type of black operations that was targeted towards, you know, back to what I keep saying that this was always about keeping Donald Trump out of the White House. And now the mission, I think, now has changed course. I think the mission has changed for it to now figure out where do you go from here?

[00:30:57]And what we're seeing is they're trying to bring Harry back, you know, or will they keep him over here? I mean, things didn't go the way that they anticipated it was supposed to go. I really do believe that these two thought that they were going to have control or at least the government would have been satisfied enough to have control of the online space to where they could continue to keep curating these narratives and being able to kick people off or deplatform or censor or arrest them. I mean, this is where this couple was going. They wanted these laws put into place, and I don't think they saw how difficult this was going to be. And I don't think that they saw Elon Musk buying Twitter. And I don't think that they saw that Donald Trump was going to get back into office, you know, and I really do think, especially for Megan, she thought she could do much better than what the royals had to offer in building her empire. And when I say that she didn't see USA ID going to be disrupted or the whole NGO charity fraud being exposed, I believe she saw that she could become this billionaire if she followed the footsteps of the Clinton Foundation or the Obama Foundation or the Gates Foundation cuz that's exactly how this Arch Fagazy public charity had been set up. And I guarantee that a lot of money had been flowing their way and often to offshore accounts, which I think now all this publicity around how broke they're going is really to throw the scent off cuz maybe people are poking around and looking into their finances and they want people to think that they're poor.

[00:32:39]You know, that's what I think is going on here. I don't believe for one second that Harry and Megan are having financial troubles. Not for a second.

[00:32:47]But anyway, that's just me giving my thoughts. But what do you guys think? Do you see how this could easily have been a black operations that the whole royal family was aware of? Well, maybe not so much the rest of the royal family, but definitely the queen and King Charles now. I think they knew what was going on. I mean, they have access to all of this intelligence. But let me know your thoughts below. As always, I will be back with more content, but until then, please be safe and I'll talk to you later. Bye. Such a fraud.