The 1917 film Fear, directed by Robert Wiene and starring Conrad Veidt, explores the psychological horror of a man who learns he will die exactly 7 years from today, demonstrating how the ticking clock motif creates sustained tension and paranoia throughout the narrative.
深掘り
前提条件
- データがありません。
次のステップ
- データがありません。
深掘り
Before DR CALIGARI, There Was FEAR (1917)追加:
It's an age-old question. If you knew the exact date you were going to die, how would you handle your life?
The 1917 horror film Fear provides a comprehensive and compelling answer.
Directed by Robert Wiene, his last project before the genre-defining Cabinet of Dr. Caligari, it was also his first collaboration with that film's breakout star, Conrad Veidt.
The actor was still at the beginning of his career here, so he is delegated a supporting role.
Still, his character easily is the most mysterious and spooky among the cast, largely thanks to Veidt's slender, sinister on-screen nature.
An intriguing glimpse into the incredible roles he would soon execute.
Produced in the first year of his film career, Fear is additionally noteworthy as the oldest surviving Conrad Veidt performance we have.
His other four films that year are currently classified as lost.
So, what is Fear about?
Fear.
Well, then. See you next week.
No, a very streamlined but gripping hook is deployed at once.
An affluent, happy-go-lucky count returns home from years abroad, traveling the world in search of rare and pricey treasures.
Except, it is eminently apparent that something is seriously wrong with the man.
His famously positive disposition has been replaced with an overbearing cocktail of paranoia, anxiety, anger, and yes, fear.
He demands to be left alone. He wants the doors locked, the curtains drawn.
Likewise, I was drawn right in.
What on earth has reduced this guy to such a wreck?
Well, in his travels, he journeyed to India, where he heard tales of a special Buddha statue.
It could cure the sick, ease the minds of the depressed, that kind of jazz.
Like a typical European, Count Greven wanders right in and steals the treasure for himself.
He escapes, but the proclaimed wrath from the Indian priest, played by Conrad Veidt, has shaken the boots right off his feet.
The paranoia digs so deep, Greven is at the point of seeking the coward's way out when he spots Michael Myers precursor loitering outside the window.
The priest has come.
But, does he put the count out of his misery?
No. Instead, he lets the count know that he will die exactly 7 years from today at the hand of the one who loves him most.
Without elaborating further, he buggers off.
What a nifty twist. What a personal hell for our protagonist. Prolonging this paranoia out for 7 years, or so I thought.
Greven is given an instant lust for life.
He's got a window, a relatively limited one, but he proclaims he will live to the fullest.
Again, in typical fashion, that translates to instantly starting a life of drunken debauchery.
Carpe diem, my friend. Carpe diem.
Eventually, this grows tiresome for the count, thus already showing the cracks in his restored glee.
There are only so many days left, so he tries to fast track an entire life.
He jumps from common human ambitions one by one.
No sooner does he achieve his goal and he's burning bridges and onto the next thing.
To put it in other terms, he acts like a total count, but without the O.
One of these important lifetime desires is to take a wife, which occurs when he meets Lady Greven.
She is, as they used to say in 1917, a boo-ya-hottie.
So, he's finally found love, and if we recall the priest's threat, maybe you can see where the horror is heading.
Maybe, or maybe not.
Fear is, at its heart, a deeply human tale. And I think that's why it continues to resonate so well over a century after its release.
If this were to be remade for the 21st century, and I would absolutely love to do so myself, Glevin's wants and actions wouldn't change all that much.
Though, if you come into the film expecting a Caligari-type experience, as I sort of did, you might be a little put off.
As you can see from the clips, Fear lacks that film's signature production design, that German expressionist feel, opting for a more grounded style that fits the more realistic narrative.
However, Robert Wiene's fingerprints are still keenly felt.
Wiene often dealt in paranoid cinema, take Hands of Orlac as a prime example.
Fear is an extreme dive into that concept.
Even when Glevin becomes joyful and everything is good, the audience can still feel the weight of that constantly ticking clock.
Glevin can, too, even if he's trying to mask it.
It's just an insanely brilliant method to inspire anticipation and paranoia for the remainder of the movie.
The notion that the priest may or may not be a figment of this man's crumbling mind is also right in line with the director's more famous films.
When Glevin's psyche really starts to crack in the third act, we are presented with some of the ghostly tricks he would repeat in Orlac, although in a more basic form.
Conrad Veidt's part is limited, but remains distinct.
Like the ticking clock motif, I was always anticipating his character's return.
The actor was simply effortless when it came to these types of roles.
So, yeah, it's fascinating to witness the origins of all that.
Fear could have benefited from a little more of his presence, true.
To have him obliquely swatted about during the second act would not be appropriate, but blink and you'll miss it disguised images or appearances could have been really creepy.
So, with Veidt mostly absent, this basically becomes the Bruno De Carli show.
His whiplash states of being are channeled astutely.
He's a strange, complicated character once the story gets going, and a curious one to keep an eye on throughout.
De Carli is at his best when he's having a nervous breakdown, which luckily for us, is rather frequent.
Could the film be trimmed down slightly?
Sure. There are many instances of characters gesticulating about, but get the point across, but then continue for another minute.
Hey, that's silent cinema for you.
The cut I watched was a more recently discovered full print running around 72 minutes long, but for quite some time, the only surviving print was closer to the 50-minute mark.
I have not seen that version, admittedly, so I'm not sure if it has been trimmed down in the {quote} unquote correct way, or if scenes of important value were lost instead, etc. In any case, I still heartily recommend the full-length version, which, let's be honest, is still only a third of your average movie length today.
I also recommend leaving other people's stuff alone. It's not difficult.
>> It's not difficult.
関連おすすめ
Fouchon is Defeated | Hard Target
ActionPicks
4K views•2026-05-28
It Takes Two 💞
barefootandindependent
1K views•2026-05-31
Supply and demand, my friend. #movie #edit #shorts
gaskinpenton
11K views•2026-05-28
🎬 Across the Line (2000) 4K | Brad Johnson Neo-Western Thriller 🔥 | Crime & Border Justice
BabelWestern
734 views•2026-05-30
An Anime For Every Letter In LGBTQIA
KrisPNatz
2K views•2026-05-31
Mark Kermode reviews Tuner
kermodeandmayostake
2K views•2026-05-28
Once Upon A Time In The West (1968) - 20 Hidden Facts Nobody Knows
AmazingMovieRewind
111 views•2026-05-28
Backrooms Movie Review
TheAwardsContender
785 views•2026-05-30











