The video astutely frames these "disclosures" as a calculated exercise in narrative control designed to manage public curiosity without revealing anything of substance. It serves as a sobering reminder that government transparency is often just another form of strategic distraction.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
WHITE HOUSE RELEASES FIRST BATCH OF UFO FILES TO THE PUBLIC! DISCLOSURE COMING?Added:
little double broadcast here today on both the um Down to-earth channel and the Christian Haroff channel here today.
Yes, we would do our normal show that we do on the Christian Haroff channel as well little little later on, but there was some news and there was a lot of um we used to do quite a few of UAP based material on this channel. So, we're doing a double broadcast. We did it once for the hearing, so we're doing it here today. Um the documents that were promised from the White House about UAP about starting the disclosure process uh has begun. Question is, was there anything really of note in the first wave? And was that to be expected or is this much to do about nothing? It's going to be myself and attack Peter on the show here today for Down to Earth on the double broadcast. So, thanks for joining us. Let's get to it.
[music] Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen, to the show. Excited to have you on uh or be here with me.
>> Yo, >> we're joined by our good friend Peter here. abrupt is all only it's the only thing I can do in this uh Streamyard.
Anyway, >> [laughter] >> um welcome back to the show. Welcome back to the show, Peter. I haven't seen you in a while.
>> Hey, man. Thanks for having me back.
It's been a lot going on and uh both of us have such busy schedules, but I'm glad to make time especially for a big big news day. It it is I mean look here here's the thing for people who who don't know and I already see in the comments especially because like the reason why I did the crossover there rightfully so there are a lot of skeptical people and you and I talk about this all of the time so there are people who just write you know there's there's the standard oh it's man-made it's man-made you you don't know [ __ ] yet you don't just you can say I believe it is could it could be in the same way that you can't definitively say that's something from another planet that's something you can't you can't say that yet because the the all these files haven't come It's the definitive thing that always drives me nuts or the definitive That's a balloon. Stick the balloon up your ass, MC Weston.
[laughter] Um, but this is um this is going to be interesting to see what we think here because did you see Bersett on Ro? Okay, so he essentially said the same thing, right? He said, "Look, >> I'm getting briefed. There's going to be some stuff that comes out. I don't expect them to really do much yet because I don't have faith in a lot of the government. I don't have a faith that they're going to they've been protecting this stuff long enough they're going to find a way to protect it again. Jeremy Corbel when he was announcing that these things were coming out. Um he said essentially the same thing. He said, "Look, it's good that they're starting. It doesn't seem there's going to be like massive things that come out in the first wave, but there it is a good start." So, I guess the first thing I ask you is you went through the files. Is there anything of note that you go, "Oh, wait. This this is big. this is going to start to turn some people over over or is it a good start or is this much to do about nothing? Where do you stand right now? I >> I quickly went through them. Uh I only saw like a handful of pictures. I didn't see the 47 pictures. I if I missed it, you know, I I saw like maybe 10 or 12 pictures in that uh on that on the war.gov site, which by the way, the alien.gov site not even working. It's like, you know, >> this doesn't even work. Okay, perfect.
Well, for me it like gives me a warning like you're about to get a virus if you go into this [laughter] mess, dude. But um but you know, my there was nothing I saw that was too impressive. It's all like more of the same. I guess if you're not following this at all, the the takeaway could be like, oh, this is what the takeaway could be. The government is saying officially that these images represent uh you know or are are considered legitimate images of literally unidentified you know aerial phenomena flying objects whatever you know so I guess there's that but you know and not to get political I just feel like and no matter what you know side of the aisle you land on if we're still doing that it seems like this is it's got you got to be careful where the source of the information is. You know, I I I I sent you the link to that Tim Dylan video >> uh where it he kind of breaks it down and to sum it up quickly, it's just like, >> you know, he the president is a TV guy. He gets the idea of of attention, you know, economy. And I'm not saying he's in charge with how it's disseminated. Maybe someone else is advising it. You could say that, you know, on the cynical side that like, hey, drip it out so we got something to talk about every week in case we want to change the narrative of the of the news cycle and and the more like sincere side, you could say, hey, if there is something heavy to come out at some point, maybe you don't do it all at once. Maybe we kind of just do the boiling frogs thing over the course of a week, which you could argue is what's been happening over the last couple years, right? And uh maybe it lines up with that soul chart we used to talk about. Um but at least in this case you have a a sense that maybe it's just like hey let's just continue that strategy over the microcosm of a few weeks or whatever.
>> There also might be a situation where they're just like there's only you know as Bur had said there's people who know how to block this stuff and know how to do and it's like I said yesterday on my video I'm like look if you know it's it's not like they just said hey we're disclosing everything go now. and nobody had time to prepare. They've been talking about this now for over a month, 2 months, 3 months, whatever it was. So if people again hypothetically were able to protect these secrets for as long as they were, whatever it might be, whatever you believe it could be, technology from another country, technology from us, techn whatever it might be that they don't want out there, they could easily say, "Okay, look, they are going to be going after this side.
Give them that. Give them that. They can release that. That's going to be blurry footage that's going to go nowhere in the public anyway. No one's going to say anything. Mick West will call it a balloon. These things, don't don't worry about it. There's nothing in there that's going to say, you know, the gig is up >> or the jig is up, whatever they say. Um I always say the gig, >> the gib, >> whatever. So, but either way, it that's the thing to me that um you it's it it was always like when we used to talk about it, we're like, "Oh, we know where these things are and we're going to we know where they are right now and we're going to get them in 3 months from now."
>> And then and then we go they go 3 months and it's like, "Oh, the warehouse is empty." Well, no [ __ ] I know that that's like you know I try to find analoges in my own personal like professional life to what I'm seeing happening when I see these uh you know cycles and Christian I bet you could like you know relate to this >> you know in in even in the entertainment industry right like if someone's going to announce something a trailer for a movie or in my case even if you post a picture relating to someone else's IP on an official site There are so many layers of clearance that have to get signed off on >> and and there's always somebody who says, "Ah, that's not the lighting we agreed on," or, "You forgot this legal line." So, I can only imagine that if you're talking about something at this level, there would be layers upon layers of bureaucracy, right? Um, my question is always like is that maybe where the leaks come from those bureaucracy layers or or is it more like lawyers that are going through, hey, be careful if you release this because this shows this in the background or you you know what I mean? 100% there's there's absolutely you're going to run into those problems.
What can be declassified? What can't be those? I can see that.
>> Yeah. So, look what I want to do is the first thing we're going to play a couple of different things or read a couple different things. Um, but the first thing is there are some outlets already covering this in the news. Um, and so here's one. I guess this one's from Fox News. So, let me let me play this one.
These dorks.
They're saying no audio, Christian.
>> Oh, really?
>> Yeah.
>> They're getting no audio on it.
>> No, no, no. They can't hear it either.
>> Oh. All right. Um All right. Hold on.
How about now?
Can they hear it now? Tell me. Can you guys hear it now?
Peter, can they hear it now?
Can they hear it now?
>> Nope.
>> Okay. All right. Hold on.
Okay. Well, I don't know why Streamyard's doing it. I can hear it just fine. Uh Um just I would just say go into those files cuz like that that they don't really say anything in these clips now. Like it was that's what's really funny. I watched that clip this morning um on Fox News and it was just saying like this is it. There's going to be something big. This is part of the beginning of a series of weeks of leaks.
So they were even like couching it and like hey this is going to be little by little. You know what I mean?
>> Yeah. Um and keep going as I'm looking at some >> Yeah. Yeah. [clears throat] And so, you know, so the clip was kind of like a nothing burger, but it it's it's I always think of any of these cable news channels as being delivered to my parents' generation, you know, who are probably not following this stuff cuz I don't know if anybody in our age group watches that stuff. Um, so maybe that's the strategy there. like, "Hey folks, you know, you may not have heard about this, but the government is starting to release files, you know, and group of these uh of files and uh you can go to this website and start to see them for yourself. It's very exciting."
Again, if I'm trying to put a positive spin on it, it would be that here is the government officially acknowledging it, which again, like I don't know, man, if you go back [laughter] 10, 15 years, that's crazy in and of itself, but in this case, like we, if you're watching the show at least, you know, you're very caught up. And so, this might be a nothing burger still for us. I guess I'm hoping for the day where we get to the point where even people like us who follow this regularly um are also excited.
>> Yeah. Yeah. Um look this is I want to go to the one of the like I think that um who was it? I think red um red panda koala.
>> Yeah.
>> Post he reposted this. So this is this is from the department of war that actually >> man he covers he's on it bro.
>> Yeah he's on this. Let me let me let me cover this here. So give me a second.
Um, >> oh, lost. There you are.
>> I'm going to read I'm going to read the actual um thing from the Department of War here. So, give me one second, please. Uh, thank you for dealing with this stuff, too, cuz it's a pain in the ass. Uh, okay. Today, the Department of War announced the initial release of the new never be before seen files on UAP as part of the presidential unsealing and reporting system for UAP encounters.
This inter agency effort includes the white house, the office of the director of national intelligence, the department of energy, the do's all domain announce uh the freaking arrow leader which hopefully been disbanded uh national aeronautics and space administration the federal bureau of investigation and additional components of the US intelligent agencies collection will be housed on war.gov yada yada yada release follows the direction of Trump to begin the process of identifying declassifying government files related to UAP in the interest of total transparency. Let's see. So Pete, so they're going full on here and they this is kind of everybody who is involved in this in general. Um but I don't know this is just the announcement of it up top from what I'm seeing there too. the actual what are what are some of the the other things that that you saw that we should be you know >> I saw a series of of images I think if you go to war.gov gov.
>> Yeah.
>> Um, it showed uh there's actual images to look at and some video clips. Um, >> again, like I'm not saying this is nothing. I'm actually trying to look at the bright side of it, which is hopefully this is going to be like a serialized release for some reason. I'm also not naive to the fact that I think the timing of this is always something to consider.
>> Sure. But both things can be true. You know what I mean? Like I I really do think if you think that the government is not to be trusted, well, part of that could be, hey, let's release some crazy stuff.
>> Mhm.
>> That is sure to take the eye off of some things we don't want the focus to be on, whether it's war, you know, whether it's Epstein, whatever it is.
>> Yeah.
>> Um, >> so I think you can hold both things. You could have a situation where it's like bittersweet, like finally we're getting to talk about this topic in a legitimate way where people can't say that, you know, the government's denying that this is real, so you're just a looney tune for talking about it.
>> I think that's an important point. I think the other thing that is inevitable, and I already see it, it's it's such a cheap mentality for Bill.
It's a nothing burger. It's a nothing burger. It's a nothing burger. It's a mentality because the thing is right away if this is it, if they close this off and say, >> "This is it. this is all we have. Then [clears throat] it's nothing but like the way that that um you know the last hearing that not the last one but the one before that was like that was absolutely there was nothing there. It's the same [ __ ] over and over again.
>> To me the reason why this is encouraging because they said they're going to release stuff and they did and you said they make it more serious that people are actually talking about it and not laughing. And maybe now when people and talk show hosts bring it up and maybe the audience will, you know, maybe the the laughter will get a little lower now because that's still happening. Like well they talked about UFOs. H good.
>> You've been saying it like the one thing that needs to happen >> is that this needs to be covered on mainstream news. No matter whether or not people think mainstream news has credibility is not the point. The point is it needs to get to the point where it's being discussed >> in a like you know mainstream environment so it's not like you say a fringe topic. So that is a win. You know, if you actually care about disclosure in any real way, right? Not like as an issue to dunk on someone with >> is that people are talking about it.
That's the whole point of it. Yeah.
There's not I I don't Now, if you're going to ask me and people goes, "Do you think there was enough in there to convince people that there's either, you know, people are interdimensional traveling or there's alien life?" No. If if that's what you're calling it, sure.
Then yeah, then I agree with you. Um but see, this is so this guy says, um, LOL's not used to taking an L. Who took the L on that one? Was that Now, I don't know who he's talking about. Is he talking about necessarily is he talking about people who think, "Oh, nothing's coming out." Or is he think, you know, or people going, "Oh, yeah, there's stuff that is coming out. There's there's no one won or lost in this one."
>> I really don't think we should. Yeah.
Honestly, guys, I really, if you're watching this, I really don't think we should keep it in that conversation. At the end of the day, look, I'll say this.
I think that if there's ever a battle, it's a battle of workingclass people and elite people in elite class. It's a class war. And if you're telling me that you think the UAP UFO topic can be used in a in a as a weapon in a class war, I agree. I think it could be.
>> That's what people don't understand is that you and I are not saying, "Look, that's it. They proved it. They improve [ __ ] They improve anything."
>> Cuz Luna was asked about it. Rep. Luna was asked on her Twitter and they said something along the lines like, "Look," and they're right. Whoever wrote this, they said there's got to be stuff in here eventually out of all of this dump that comes out. There's got to be something that says, "Hey, um, this is gamechanging.
You have convinced us or it's going to be embarrassing that they're going down this." Because I I I equate it to like what they did with the uh the JFK >> um files. It's like, "Oh, we're just all these big JFK files going. We're going to find out." We didn't find out anything.
>> You didn't find out anything. You don't know if if people worked alone. You still people, if you thought JFK was taken out by Lee Harvey Oswald, by the end of that, you still thought that. And if you [clears throat] thought that he that it was a consp conspiracy with the CIA, you still thought that there was nothing in there in those files. Oh, here that's what we're were going on first. And then the freaking the Epstein files, which still you can't release those. And people are because of the amount of people that are going to get in trouble and other things and and the sources that are being protected. If they ain't releasing that stuff, they like you said earlier, there is an absolute reason why >> that they are going to trickle out stuff like this and as that person said to Luna, >> there has to be stuff that comes out and like he the person mentioned like what about the x amount of videos that you guys have talked about and she said and I think people keep mentioning this thing. What about the 4K videos? What about that? It ain't coming out in the first dump. And then she said we have made a request that in the initial dumps that that's where that stuff is going to come out. The stuff that we have seen >> right that is going to be crucial because if the second or third or fourth are similar to this people are going to start losing interest quick.
>> Yeah. I think it, you know, and if you're looking for it, I think on I found the link on X, uh, maybe Joe Mergia or someone had it where I linked me directly to I just went to war.gov and it wasn't like on the main page where you'd think it'd be, but there is a link to it. Maybe someone in the chat could put it and we could find it faster. But, um, >> I I try to say I try to put my myself and I don't know if I'm capable of doing this, but I try to put myself in the mindset if I was in a situation >> I see it. Yeah. Go ahead.
>> You see it? Okay. If I was in a situation where um I wanted to make someone talk about one issue and less about another issue, right? If I was, let's just be literal.
If I was trying to distract from the conversation about the war in Iran, that's, you know, in on an in an election year, by the way, doesn't matter where you fall politically, that's a strategical conversation, >> right? or if I wanted to distract from Epstein files or that weird Melania speech that happened, you know, I need something that's really good because those are really intense topics. Those are really important things that people are going to want to talk about no matter how you think about them.
>> So, if I got this UFO thing and if I know that I'm let's say that someone said, "Hey, you want to disclose some stuff? You can release these photos. You can release these videos. They're already on the internet. No one seems to be freaking out. Release them." But that's all you're going to get. And if you think you're going to walk some gray on the White House lawn, it ain't happening. Okay, so this is what you got. So what would you do? You would say, "Shit, okay, that's like, I got 200 videos. I got, you know, x amount of months till the election. I got to spread this out because every time we drop them, we have a chance of this being a conversation." Glenn Greenwald talked about this when it came to the Wikileaks thing. They intentionally did not just leak everything. You remember that time? They intentionally did not just leak everything at once. They did this weekly Wikileaks drop so that there was time to focus on what was happening.
Yeah. So you could say that that strategy was very effective. It was.
>> Maybe that's the approach for this if and by the way I'm saying that from a cynical standpoint from the standpoint of distracting people. Now grass is greener argument. I saw someone write this uh I don't know who it was so I apologize on on Twitter like hey even this like nonexciting release day is leverage for people who want to continue the conversation and push for more disclosure because now you're not starting from zero right >> you're starting from hey federal government you admit that there's stuff in the sky we don't understand here are people that are backing you up and agreeing with you with more information.
We need to investigate this stuff.
Seriously. And now that people, you know, regular Joe public has seen it on their mainstream channels. They're going to be like, "Yeah, what the hell?" You know, so it's different in that regard.
I'm not saying it's tomorrow. I'm just saying it's different.
>> Yeah. No, and I think look, and as you said, as we said, the as we've been talking about the last couple of weeks, you look at and you go back in time and just go back even before 2023, right?
The conversation in 2022 was much different than the conversation of 2026, right? There are more people who are talking about there are more people who in general have been um asking more questions and as we said, you could absolutely look and say, I don't know what the hell this is. Um they have not shown anything of note yet to make me say, okay, that's what I think it is yet. because you haven't done in these files yet. But I think releasing information in general, I don't disagree with you at all that I think that there's a reason and a strategy for saying, "Hey, let's let's release this now. Let's hope that the um mainstream media runs with this as the lead story as opposed to how once again we haven't hit negotiations with Iran, gas prices are going up. Um this let let's get them away from that. Let's talk. Let's have them start talking about, "Oh, are aliens real? I can understand people saying, "Oh, well, that's clearly a distraction tactic." And the answer is it very well might be. Doesn't mean that the that the topic itself isn't real, isn't legit. It just means when they're using it, why they're using it. And that's but that's government in general, right? What can we talk about right now that can either further our agenda um divert attention away from what we need to do and those types of things. So, um, yeah, I don't know. I think that I want to go over a couple the videos you'd mentioned with with Joe of what he had.
So, let me, uh, let me show these first.
I'll bring up the UFO Joe.
>> Um, and he said, "This one's pretty cool. This is the undisclosed location.
This is from Arrow actually did this."
Okay. Well, that that makes me nervous in general that they're the ones who allowed allowed this to come out. But here's here's the the video.
Um, there's no sound on it anyway. So, um, you can see again, this is the this is the problem. The what I was worried about like videos like this.
>> Exactly. But they said they can't hear me when I'm off screen, just FYI.
>> Okay. So, they can't hear. Period. That That's which is fine. Um, for this one.
And I guess it's because of the story one. That's why. Which is fine. If they can hear me, that's okay. And And so you see this right now and this thing's moving around and it's kind of zipping back and forth. You don't know what the hell it is. is I mean that's there's no doubt about it that that's like what is that? But you know >> Oh, they said they can hear me. So, I will say this reminds me of the uh Bledo stuff.
>> Look at that.
>> It's a It's cool. I mean, look, could you could you like explain that away?
Maybe if you're a skeptic, you could say, "Oh, yeah, you got a I mean, first of all, you could say it's all AI stuff right now. That's the easy argument or like good after effects." Yeah, I guess if we if that's the case, you could discuss it. It is really rad that little trail that I just had.
>> Yeah. I mean, yeah, look at that. I mean, it's But, you know, there's like you said, you can easily look at that and I'm sure already in the comments we're getting this like, oh, that's this, that's that, that's swamp gas, that's this. That's the problem with videos like this.
>> Yeah.
>> It always will be.
>> Yeah. But that's that's always will be the issue, >> right? Yeah. Exactly. That Yeah, >> a thousand%. And it will always be the issue is that if with videos like no matter what they even they're zipping around, they're doing interesting things. They're bouncing off things. It does not matter. And and and here's the other thing. You and I have talked about this a million times over. A million times over.
>> At this point, if if someone's driving and I get a full shot of a UFO and two aliens come out and say, "Hey, where is the where is the nearest In-N-Out burger?" And I get that on there, immediately they go, "That's AI. No, that's the it is really weird, man.
Like, it is a weird thing this time that we're in because >> it's nothing is now we're at a point where and I'm saying this about me who I believe there is another nonhuman life whether it's in on this planet, an ultraterrestrial, an extraterrestrial, whatever. I believe I I I just have that gut feeling, right?
>> Yeah. Even me, because I know, I believe, and I and I I'm looking for confirmation, I've become so skeptical that everything I see, >> you know, is some kind of manipulation, whether it's like I like even the blood so stuff I think is really interesting and cool and I and he is very believable when I hear him talk. And this idea that like other people are watching him summon stuff that looks like what you just showed is super interesting. I just don't know what to make of it anymore.
And I think we've gotten to the point where you can't you can't you can't make a determination based on anything you see.
Unfortunately, >> so true. Unless it's I mean like look the other thing that people were always hoping to get and I think that when you think about when you think about disclosure or whatever this thing is >> Yeah.
>> in your mind you're picturing Bill Pullman walking up and saying, "Hey, here's the deal." You know, and you're hoping that it's not to the Independence Day level of here's the deal, but you're hoping a president is going to step up and say this is the deal. We are not alone. Here's the reason. Here are all the things that happened. It ain't going to happen like that.
>> Well, did you see the Obama interview with Co Bear yesterday?
>> Yeah, I talked about that. But, you know, let me let me take a quick break.
Yeah.
>> Um, and I want to let people know that also what we're going to do is just going to take a quick break and when I get back, I really want people to if you want to, you know, this is different because we're on both channels here and we're not normally live on the um not normally live on on the DTE channel. So, if you guys want to ask any like we already saw a super chat come in. If there's any questions you super chat want to super chat in that we can take towards the end, feel free. If not, just as good. But normally we don't really do live shows for DTE. So, if you want to throw any questions into me and Peter, go ahead and put those in there now.
We'll read them by the end of the show.
Um, but that being said, I do have a sponsor here today that I want to bring up real quick. We we'll bring it back in um once we're done talked about about Rouette. Yep. Make jokes. Uh Rouette's the best. Love him. Tell you about them.
Here it is. Life comes at you fast, man.
When you're busy and things just kind of land when you're not expecting it and it all happens like at once. Doesn't matter if it's work, relationships, everything else that you have on your plate. You want to know that you can show up when it counts. And that includes the bedroom, everybody. Things aren't working the way that you used to. You don't have to accept it. Rouette, they have treatments that can help you uh get hard, stay hard as long as you want.
Whether it's occasional trouble or something that's been building for a while, their doctors work with you to find what fits your body. Their bestselling treatment, which is rouette ready, it combines three clinically proven ingredients in one minty dose that dissolves right under your tongue.
It increases blood flow and primes your brain for arousal so you're ready physically and mentally. Most men are good to go in about 15 minutes with effects lasting up to 36 hours. Timing is your issue. Rouette has go long which is a twoin one treatment that helps you get hard stay in control when you finish. Over 400,000 men have already made that switch to Rouette. Getting started is very simple. Rouette connects you with a boardcertified doctor online and treatment ships discreetly to your door. you head on over to rouette.com/christian, you will get 15% off of your ED treatment. That is ruggie t.com/christian for 15% off. Rouette, performance medicine for men.
Um, thank you, Rouette. Again, check the links in the description for both channels. Uh, if you want to help out the show, you want to help us in general, it's how you do it. Keep us going. Uh, Peter, I saw that you you shot that a message. Can you just send me those pictures? just text them to me or whatever, too, and I'll I'll I'll run them through. Um, >> yeah, because you look there. Oh, you just sent me a couple of those. But there's something else that we were talking about, Arrow, and I want to talk about, you know, the Sean Kurpatre stuff and you were talking about Obama. So, we have those things that we'll definitely be discussing, but let me let me bring up what you just sent me here. Um, okay.
Let's see.
>> This is the one that I thought was the most at least it's definitely new to me.
I haven't seen it, but it also looks so fake, dude. Like it it now having said that it looks fake in a way that if it was real I should be blown away by the visualness the visual weirdness of it.
>> Okay.
>> I don't know man. You tell me when you see that one.
>> Let me let me see. Hold on.
>> Disclose.tv I guess is who has it on.
Yeah. Look at that.
>> All right. Hold on. Bring >> or disclo.
>> Oh, sorry. All right. There. There it is. So that Why? I don't know why it's upside down.
>> No, it looks good on my end.
>> Oh, it looks upside down to me. I don't know why. So, Luke, if you're able to change the mirror on that, hopefully, but it's Well, either way, it Yeah, it looks upside How's that upside down? Who knows? Doesn't look upside down to you.
>> No, it reminds me of uh uh that Charlie Sheen movie where he's doing the ad for the deodorant upside down. Was it major league?
>> Yeah, upside down. Right. So, look look.
So, that's number two. Uh Department of War. Yeah. This This one here is one you're talking about, right?
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah. I mean, yeah, man. Like, let's see. Can I bring that up? Yeah.
>> What am I looking at? Looks it looks >> that looks like Photoshop day one, but >> looks so photoshopped.
It looks so Photoshop.
>> So that's another weird thing. So either we're looking at something like really wild, but dude, I don't know. That looks like like Photoshop day one and if if if >> that picture that picture was in the files.
>> Yeah, I that was part of a link on war.gov that I was sent to on on X where I saw the other shots. Like >> that's the one you lead with. If you know that that's real. Who took that?
>> If that's real, that's the craziest photo of all time.
>> But it looks fake. Someone just right.
That looks fake as f. 100%. That looks >> Oh. Oh. Okay. Tokyo Toy Bond. What's up, dude? He says it's a rendered graphic.
It says in the description. Okay. Okay.
Okay.
>> Okay. It's rendered. Okay. All right.
That makes >> that makes more sense. All right.
>> Rendered for what? For what people saw, >> I guess. But but what are we doing?
[laughter] >> Yeah. Well, this is what you know they were right.
>> Lab rendered drawing. Okay. Okay.
>> So, it was a lab.
>> All right. Everybody relax. We don't have to read. But that's but that's good to that's good to to know and that's why we're doing that's why we're here together. So um >> this is this now wait a minute.
>> Thank God cuz I saw that this morning.
I'm like please God tell me they're not trying to tell [laughter] me that's real.
>> See this is the thing like I for people who are brand new to my channel. I mean because I know DT I don't go live a lot.
Um I I I I don't put up with with dicks.
Um so I I so for me it's like I'm all for conversation. You start being a dick then I throw you the [ __ ] out. I don't care. go to a different channel. I'll give [ __ ] I'm I'm not I'm not in here for like, oh, I need you to catch up to so and so's views. Suck my balls and talk about on Tuesday. I don't I don't care. [snorts] >> Um I I don't care like that. That's You talk to my friend with respect. That's And And you can have the And you know, you don't have to agree with us. You don't have to agree, but have conversations. I'll throw you the [ __ ] out. It's my store. You don't come in with your with your dick.
>> Yeah. Exactly.
>> Um anyway.
>> All right. I sent you Ryan Graves an hour ago posted the the the link that I clicked on this morning and it is a war.gov link.
>> Okay.
>> Um it does it's exactly what I saw this morning. So it's like it seems like 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 like 15 or so slides or videos.
>> Okay. So this is what the the picture the one that he Oh, the Okay, I see.
>> It's got it's got the the weird one we just looked at, but it's got other stuff, too. So this is what I assume is today's drop.
Let's just say it that way.
>> All right. Today's drop. That's fine.
All right. So, let's let's do this. Um, bring make sure you got your audio up.
I'm going to bring up this. Make sure we can see this. Okay. This is what we're talking about, right?
>> Yes.
>> Okay. So, and I guess you can go to each slide over here. All right. So, why don't you break us down and tell us what we're looking Oh, there's that one. So, this is that render.
>> That's what I'm saying. That's that. So, this is obviously the one I stopped at.
>> Right. Right.
>> Okay. The This is what I'm talking about. The rest of these aren't going to win anybody over in my opinion.
>> Let's start let's start from we let's start from we'll go from here.
>> Yeah.
>> Start from there.
>> So again [laughter] I it's almost crazy to to talk about something like this. What are we going to say this? It says there's a description at the bottom. It says uh unresolved UAP report Indoaccom. So US Indoacific Command reported UAP that resembles a football and then it's covered by the lower third, right? Uh but um a football something I imagine football shape something. Let me see. I can probably pull it up on my end too.
>> Some someone also said that you can finish the slides and then there's videos.
>> Yeah below. Okay. Have you looked at the videos also?
>> I I looked at some of them.
>> Okay.
>> Okay. Again I I didn't have my my mind blown but you know like uh let me see. I want to see if I can read this. Can you read the what's underneath the lower third?
>> I want to get rid of my lower third.
Hold on. Let me get rid of that.
>> This guy with branding. There you go.
>> I know. I know. That's that's Luke's fault. But I believe we [laughter] know me, too.
>> Um, okay.
>> Yeah. Go back to the other one real quick.
>> All right.
>> That one.
>> Yeah. Here we go. Okay. Football shape body near Japan. All right. So, >> if we're just being like objective and just looking at what we're looking at, this is assumingly this is what they have in their files as stuff. Hey, yeah, we've seen some weird stuff. We don't know what it is either, >> right?
>> Um, and here is some of that stuff. Now, I believe they have way more, but okay, we're looking at what we're looking at.
So, it says that they're claiming this is a footballshaped >> body. And someone could make the argument and and you can't really fault them for it saying, "Well, what is that?
I don't know what that is."
>> Looks like a booger on a lens, >> right?
>> I'm sorry. And I want to believe, guys.
>> No, you could tell me that somebody like, you know, spit on a thing or or it's like that's like something in a lab. Christian, can you imagine, dude, if like there's a at least one in this tunch [snorts] that is literally that and they're like, "Okay, put one booger.
Fine, go ahead."
>> Right. Right. And see people believe it.
I know. That's the problem. So, um Okay.
So, that that one is that's what they say that one is. Again, >> um this is the next one. US UAP in North America in 2026. Again, this is nothing.
You can't >> Can you zoom in on that one?
>> Um yes.
>> It just looks like Again, I don't know what I'm even looking at. I'm trying to get up in there.
>> I guess that right there, that light right there.
>> Is that the one? Okay. Okay, that makes more sense. I was like looking at the reticle. I'm like, that's nothing.
>> If I'm looking at the middle, that's nothing. But maybe maybe bright thing.
That could be, >> you know, again, like are we we're looking at Pong. It could be like >> it could be anything. So then >> this one again, we've I feel like we've seen this one before. This is the C this is >> right. Infrared still image captured of unidentified object over western United States.
>> Same type of thing.
>> Yeah.
>> Same type of thing.
>> Yeah. Western United States. Okay.
>> This one in the same frame as a helicopter, right? Is what we're looking at below, right? That little black dot.
>> Oh. Oh. Oh, it looks like a helicopter.
So, it is a helicopter. Um, yeah, right there. I see.
>> I feel like this kind of stuff would be more compelling as video if they had it.
But even then, >> again, it's the same, you know, infrared stuff. Um, you know, it looks like it looks like Atari, [gasps] >> dude. It looks like when you're like in science class and they show you some video from 1964 of like how like I don't know, cells form or >> Yes. There's no I can understand a thousand% how when you look at these files and this, but this is Dude, I said this yesterday on my video. I said, I guarantee you in these files, what you're going to get are more things of people going, "Well, those are dots.
That's blurry video. That's this. That's that." That's what you're going to get in this first wave. You cannot in the same way that we talked about like hearings and stuff. You can't have people saying the same things in hearings over and over time. I heard from a guy who heard from a guy who told a guy that this guy, but I really like this guy and he tells me the truth, so this guy knows that this is there and there's alien bodies. It's like there's you you can only do that once because you can go, okay, well, this guy worked somewhere, too. But now, where is that guy that saw this stuff? Let's talk to that guy on the next one. in the same way that you can't keep showing this because >> it's it's it's intentional, dude.
Because we're not people. Best picture ever. Okay. Okay. Render render.
>> If this is real, this is >> a render.
>> I know it is. I know it is what I'm saying. But if this is if this would be a real image, right?
>> Yeah. Exactly. if this was the one that you lead with that this what was like this is the type of image >> right >> that should it be a real image um you're like well wait a minute >> now we're still going to go AI >> right >> that will be the new goalpost >> that would be the first thing be would be well yes prove that's not AI um that would be it this is obviously as I said a rendered image um but so actual site photo with FBI lab rendered graphic overlay depicting the eyewitness reports It's from September 2023. But let's say now that the that this is what people said that they saw.
>> That's why they're doing this rendered image.
>> Um, >> but why were they only I'm sure they have more collab corroborating lab rendered graphics. Why not?
>> 2023. No one took a picture of this.
It's got to be >> It's still Look, here's the thing. Uh, it's still wild to see this on a government website. That is still wild for me. I don't care what anybody says.
Call me uh skeptical. I'm not saying I believe everything. I'm saying that the conversation happening in an official capacity is wild.
>> One that that was my earlier point.
Yeah.
>> My earlier point was that you would never >> or you're not old enough to remember the before dimes.
>> No, the idea that anyone's even talking about this in general and they're covering on news organizations is intriguing in general. So, okay, this is the one. So, archival imagery from the Apollo 17 mission to the moon. The yellow box contains in a large area of the original photo in which three lights are visible above the lunar terrain. So I see those three lights. Um now that was that that's 1972.
>> Come on, bro. You know they got good moon [ __ ] [laughter] >> That's the that's the light that was the line of the whole episode.
>> They got to have it, bro. I'm all in on moon stuff, you know.
>> Got to have good footage there. I think that this just this is going back to kind of what we what we saw here. So, um, >> apparently there's video, um, somewhere.
>> All right, let me see. Let me see if I can find >> war.govo.
Someone said, >> let me find the video and then if I can find the video, um, I'll play the video that we have to based on the tremendous interest shown, which directive. I'm looking down here.
>> Yeah, I think, look, man, I think, um, >> I think any any opinion you want to have right now is valid. Yeah.
>> I just think that here's the one thing, man. They're They're going nuts on everybody that said PR 38 is insane.
Page 10. PR38.
>> PR38.
>> Yeah. Page 10.
>> What the hell is that?
>> I don't know.
>> PR page 38. Okay. This is >> No. Page 10. PR38. I don't know what that means.
>> I I know what it means. Page 10. PR38. I I see it. Okay. Hold on. Let me get the page 10.
>> The only thing we can say for certain is that it is at least in my opinion, >> Yeah. Say what you will. It is at least fascinating to be at a time where this is being discussed broadly.
>> I I see I I have it. I'll I'll play it.
>> Um Okay. So, this is what they say. This one's good.
>> Well, people are saying that go look at that one. I haven't seen >> I'm Look at this one. All right. Hold on. Let me >> Hold on. Sorry, Peter. All right. Go ahead. What were you gonna say?
>> No, I missed the jellyfish. Like like >> the jellyfish.
>> I want the jellyfish to be talked. All right, there we go. So, this is the one that they're talking about, right?
Pushing.
>> Is that a video?
>> Yeah.
>> Oh, yeah. This is We've seen stills of this one. It's cool.
>> I mean, that one Yeah. I mean, that looks that I mean, that's pretty clear.
>> Sick. Yeah.
>> Yeah. Is that I mean, that's >> those biblically accurate angels.
>> Yeah. I mean, that's the most clear out of an image that you see. Like, that's pretty pretty clear.
>> That almost bums me out. Is that what that is? Look, it's got trails.
>> Yeah, >> that's pretty crazy. Like now you Well, I mean, look at the way that thing was moving.
>> Well, that trail is not helpful, is it?
Because we're saying it doesn't have trails.
>> Well, that's what I'm saying is by seeing those trails, you could make the argument that that's something else.
>> A drone or something.
>> Something else. But if but if it's in these files that they don't know what it is, >> I mean, that's pretty weird looking.
Whatever the hell that thing is.
>> Totally.
>> It's definitely very like sci-fi. It's just um >> I mean here's my opinion. How do you not how do you not see this image >> or this video and say we should talk about this today world? [laughter] >> I know that well that that's isn't that always that's what you and I have been saying that for how long?
>> Yeah.
>> You know that's that's the that's the number one thing where look we as I tried to show that video before there are a few different outlets that are covering this. There are a few, >> right? But it it it should be and maybe the intent of what the government wanted to do was say, "Okay, look, these files came out. I'm gonna Let's see. I'm going to I'll go to the major sites. I'll go to Well, Fox, I think, already had it.
So, let's let's I'm going to I'm going to look at the websites."
>> Yeah. And I see that a comment. Soul Stylist Jukebox says, "This stuff kind of scares me." Hey, man, I don't I don't blame you. I gotta try fly a lot for work this year and I keep thinking I hope those Ashton Forbes orbs aren't real, bro. I don't want to get zapped somewhere.
>> I know. You know what I mean?
>> So, let's see. Okay, so Fox News, it's the number one. It's the number one story when you go to the You go to foxnews.com.
>> Okay.
>> And it is the number one story out there. It says, >> well, that tracks, right? Like if you're the uh administration friendly news site and you want to make that >> that one up first, right? So, bring it up. But okay, fair.
>> CNN.
>> Okay.
>> Uh, nowhere to be found.
>> Okay.
>> So, let's see. Um, >> that's also weird.
>> No, no, no. Not true. Not true. Not true. It's It's there. It's on the It's on the bottom left. Pentagon releases never before seen. It's not the top story.
>> You have to scroll down >> top to the top left.
>> Did you have to scroll?
>> Bring up. Let's just bring it up on >> because I've learned something about websites.
>> Yeah. where if you place something below a scroll line, you're not prioritizing it.
>> Yeah. Yeah. So, let me let me let me show you. I'm going to I'm going to bring it up. So, I'm going to bring up I'll bring up Fox first and then bring up CN. All right. Let's see. So, and we'll go to we'll go to a bunch of different news organizations.
You can guarantee you that uh News Nation has it on number one. Um so, okay. So, this is this is Fox and that's the number one story for Fox. Okay. So now let's bring up CNN and CNN. It is Epstein and Iran and then UFOs on the bottom left there.
>> Okay. Not the worst.
>> That's not bad.
>> Still weird, but okay.
>> Still weird, but still it's it's still there.
>> I feel like you give it at least an hour at the top.
>> Yeah. How about MSNBC?
Say, >> but kudos to them for still talking Epstein. I appreciate that.
Um, is it not MSNBC anymore? What is it?
MSN What is MSNBC? Is that one not? The hell is it? NBC.
>> Yeah.
>> Uh, let's see. I don't know. Maybe that's okay. [snorts] There we go. So, >> this is the photo I need, but with an alien.
>> No. No. Uh, yeah. Right.
>> Pope Rubio. That little statue could be an alien.
Now, News Nation. Okay.
>> News Nation. First one.
>> Okay. Oh, yeah. Of course.
>> This This guy stinks. This Leland guy.
He's >> Anybody who makes a smoldering face.
>> Yeah, he stink.
>> By the way, they added color to the render. We didn't need that. We got it.
>> We didn't need that. That's historic UFO collect. Okay. So, some of these are covering it. I mean, they're all covering it, but they're not covering it um on the top. But that that goes back to your earlier point, right? where it's like, okay, this is where we need these things to they got to be covered here.
They got to be covered in general and it and the conversation is now not five years ago and no one would touch this thing with a 10ft pole. Now it's let's talk about it and because it's on the front page of all those ones that I talked about.
>> Both sides of the aisle are going to be looking at it and having the conversation about it. What somebody say?
>> No, I'm just looking the last two comments is exactly what I was thinking.
Windows Vista looks like a Windows 95.
>> It does. [laughter] >> That's exactly what I thought.
>> It did. It did absolutely do.
>> But yeah, that's Look, now at least the conversation baseline can now be what is this that that the government's talking about that like people are are are discussing like it's no longer like you have to go to some dark website to think it's you know what I mean? Like it just moves a needle somewhat. I'm not saying it's >> everything we want clearly. No, it needs look this what it does even for the skeptics that are like even in this chat right the skeptics I think are going to say okay listen I believe none of this and say somebody say nobody buys any of this stop with the stop with the the definitive statements you don't believe it which is fine you don't know what anybody else believes because I don't think there's enough information in there yet to say my the thing that I think is the biggest win here for everyone on is that people are talking about this and they're releasing stuff.
But as I mentioned, you cannot do this again in the same way that I I went from being a big advocate to the public hearings saying, "Please stop doing them because they're doing nothing."
>> Mhm. Right. [clears throat] Because the first the first one it was Grush, Graves, Fraver getting that conversation moving on. Wait a minute. What is it? It had as much it had as much impact as that 2017 um New York Times article, right? The 2024 one was a joke and it was Nancy Mace walking around with pictures of aliens in the background. It was turning into a circus and it had nobody of note.
Um there then last one was okay. Um I shouldn't say they have no one at note on the Pakistan.
>> No, I know what you mean though.
>> I think Galedet was on was on the 2024 one, but he's had said stuff that you know >> it's not moving the needle.
If you look at 2017, the the the the article that came out that kickstarted everything again, right?
>> Yeah.
>> It's weird to say we're nine years out and this is only as far as we've gotten anyway because you'd say, "Okay, we're still Yeah. Have we moved forward?"
Yeah, we moved forward, but nine years forward.
>> No. And look at what And this see this this is the kind of comment that I applaud and I agree. No, there is not >> nothing.
>> 100%. No. There is no smoking. But as they prepped you for this yesterday, I was not expecting one today. That's true.
>> No, I was not. And everybody like Grush said it, uh, Burchett said it, uh, Luna said it, everyone said it said it yesterday, too.
>> Yeah. So, we're starting it, which got to be honest with you, kind of annoying.
[clears throat] This would have been better if it had no like leadup.
>> Um, I don't know about that.
>> No, >> no, I don't know about that. I think I think I think having [clears throat] I think that for us for us that might be the case because we >> Okay, fair. Yeah. Yeah.
>> You know what I mean? Because you're so you you more than me. You're >> No, you more than me. You're doing this thing every day now. Are you kidding me?
>> But dude, you've been doing >> you.
>> Dude, you got an alien statue in your house. Look at you.
>> You gave it to me. [laughter] >> But but nonetheless, you know, for us, it's like, well, what you know, let what where's the where's the juice?
>> No, no, not yet.
>> And for for people again, think about how you and I didn't really give a [ __ ] about age of disclosure, right?
>> No, no, but you're but you're right. It is exactly >> exposure was one of the most important things that had come out and and I still have watched bits and pieces because I knew all the information that was already there. It was stuff that you and I talked about years before me that most >> I paid to watch it.
>> There was nothing in there. There was nothing in there that we hadn't that that 50 that James Fox hadn't covered before or that anybody else hadn't covered. It was all stuff. It was all stuff that was covered before and said before. But the importance of it was that Dan Farah is a big dude who, you know, is connected in the Hollywood industry that could get the word out there. And because of it, now Bill Maher is is all in and everybody else there who have seen this is all in. People that I know, friends of mine that that that again, the way that I found that documentary on um National Geographic, my friend uh John and my friend James both found that and said, "Oh, wait a minute. my eyes are opening now and I was like that they had the same whatever it was for you agent disclosure was for them and agent disclosure had that effect on a lot of people that were outside of let's say the matrix >> right yeah um the last uh uh beat that I I'm contemplating in my head uh for in the near future I have to say it is the Spielberg movie and I don't think that is random guys I I really don't >> either >> you know you don't get you don't make a movie 30 years ago uh with the head of uh Blue Book in it.
>> 30 probably like 50, dude.
>> Is that how is that how long ago?
>> Close Encounters was was dude we were so old the 30s 30 years ago within the 90s, homie.
>> Ah jeez. Yeah, you're right. My bad.
Yeah, >> look how I mean I see myself on the screen. What a disaster.
>> But it's all it's I hit a wall, man. I used to be something. But yeah, so like I think that you're this close to disclosure day, you're not going to lean on that. I dude I I I hate to say it because I I don't know if that makes me believe more or less, but I do think this is going to fold into a PR campaign for the movie. I hate to say it.
>> Well, I don't but no, you know what? I don't hate to say it. I think that that's good. I think that's important because I think that that's the PR machine that look we get our information today most people from Tik Tok and Instagram and YouTube and when most people most people didn't even know that UAP hearings were going on.
>> That's a good point. And they'll know if things go viral of Stephen Spielberg talking about disclosure and aliens and files that will come out and pop because some influencer will ask him on the trail and it'll pop up on the trail to Universal promoting the movie. And isn't it crazy that nothing has leaked from that movie in a substantial way? Like you got Doomsday leaks every 5 seconds.
You got Spider-Man leaks everywhere. But Disclosure Day pretty locked down.
>> Yeah, Mick West is in the chat. No, he's not.
>> Yeah, he is. Look.
>> Oh, is that him? This is all BS. M.
Mick, jump on here. Let's talk a little bit. What is Don't just scream from the chat. Get in here.
>> I know it. I got my my grandfather. He knows it. He knows it.
>> I KNOW IT. IT'S ALL BS. THAT'S DEFINITIVE. SIGN IT. Stop talking about it.
>> What do you know? You don't know [ __ ] >> I don't If if you're the kind of person that wants to be like brushing everything out like ah I I actually think that's the wrong approach for even your >> Yeah. uh point of view if you're that person because you just locked yourself into a spot that's easy to like you know disprove. You know there's clearly an opportunity um you know for for you to be disproved and saying it's all BS. Right. You and I have talked about this again too. This very well >> could be technology that we've had for many many years that we've been working on. This could be technology from other countries. This could be a a lot of different things. Mhm.
>> The thing is there is information and there are things that have happened that have been buried and then have been lied about and then oh no no no what we meant was this. Those things need to be exposed. You guys don't think that the scientist missing and going and and and dying and being taken out is is bizarre.
>> It's weird. Even if it guys, even if that is BS, even if that story is BS, let's just go with it, right? Let's just say it's BS. That's crazy in and of itself, you guys.
>> Right.
>> Like if all this is BS, all these photos and videos, that's crazy.
>> Yeah.
>> Like that's the that's why this is a story no matter how you slice it >> because either it is legitimate >> and it's being misinterpreted or it's being or it's legitimate on its face or it's all BS and it's being delivered to us by the the the the feeding tubes we all use for information. There's no way this is not a story, dude.
>> No. And I can't remember who it was who said this thing to it. It was various people have said this but it the amount of people look like a Tim Galidet former rear admiral you know all these Ryan Graves other people that are not just politicians and other things too.
>> There are other people that have worked at facilities and military and other have said these things. All these people are what part of the conspiracy crazy for making all this stuff up and then you have a narrative throughout the last like what 70 80 years. So, and if so, how and why? That should be >> exactly even if you say >> Yeah. Exactly. Even if you can prove somehow that this whole thing is a decadesl long SCOP where legitimate people with credible uh backgrounds have all been SCOPed. Okay, that is still crazy and that is still worth covering.
And even if you have to go through the UAP UFO disclosure movement to prove how just how deeply corrupt the the the information warfare uh has been in this country. That's still huge news.
>> Yeah. So someone's crying for something.
They released thousands of new documents. You guys aren't looking at it. We looked at a lot of it already.
>> Thousands.
>> Yeah. Thou let's look at thousands.
We'll be here until 2087.
Yeah. Yeah. Guys, if if it listen, do you know what channel you're watching?
There's two schlubs here in the in the garage. Like, we're just talking that Hey, it happened. We're looking at the cool stuff, the pictures, you know, read. We're my good friends on this on on in this space, both Pavvel and Bett's going to go through it, bro.
>> They're going to be covering it and to extension with all that stuff. We cover this in the way that we want people who are just at a coffee shop right now, never hearing about it, right? So take your crying laughing emoji, stick it in your [ __ ] >> Yeah, Christian's gonna go talk about Daredevil in half an hour. What do you want? We're just uh relax.
>> All these documents. ALL THESE DOCUMENTS.
>> THE DOCUMENTS.
>> I'M LAUGHING. OH, I mean, which one should I use? I have all these different emojis to use. Let me use this one.
>> Spinning around in your [ __ ] [laughter] >> Hey, you need everybody, bro. Believe me, we're the guys who will talk to your uncle. I guess you're the ones. You already You're a detective. You got it all figured out.
You're the best. You're the best. You got it. You know what? You figured it out. You look You went through You spent all that time. You have You're in your underoos just ch just laughing your [laughter] pitch off sitting around eating cereal going. I just spent all this time going through each and every document and these guys didn't cover it.
Which which is the emoji?
>> By the way, that's the p the aliens are not going to want to hang out with us.
>> Use an alien emoji hump.
>> The aliens are going to want to hang out with us, >> right?
>> Okay. They're not reading documents.
They want to hang out, grab a beer, you know, have a slice.
>> Yeah, this is so funny. Like just what you you run into the wrong channel, guys. What? What? You This is You didn't run it. You I'm not I'm not on the news.
I'm not on the news. This is the news.
Anyway, um now you know what we should do? We should actually go through the whole files. Oh my god. [laughter] >> I'll fall asleep on stream.
>> I know. There's so much. But there's other things that'll that that will keep um that will keep coming.
>> It's going to be Hey, this is the beginning of a week of top. You'll see it's going to be all over YouTube for a week and hopefully next Friday we get another drop and we do it again, you know, >> came to the wrong channel.
>> No, that's not Dude, >> wrong channel.
>> You made a left turn in Albuquerque.
>> Unsubscribe.
>> Yeah, >> but uh what I'm saying is I I really think that you got a week's worth of discussion on this. you you got so many different people who are going to be talking about it. Like you said, I'm gonna be watching Pavvel, you know, watching UAP Twitter and seeing what comes out of it. That's the that is the cool thing that there might be layers to this. Same thing happened with Epstein.
Epstein day one, you didn't even see all the craziest stuff. It was like days and days before you saw layers. So maybe that's an optimistic viewoint >> and that's why I brought up the Luna thing, right? She said she she's running. She Look, this is the other thing that I made a point of a thousand times over and will continue to do so.
>> Whatever topic it might be that a politician grabs on to in their career, there's a particular topic that makes them, right? There's a topic that the shines a light that they were in obscurity and now people know who they are >> in an election year, no less, >> right? Tim Burett, Luna, um, >> Burchett, by the way, he made a big point. Moscowitz, um, what's his face?
Berles, uh, Garcia, they have all made their names or at least gotten more and more people knew who they were because of their voices in the UAP topic, right? Uh, Luna especially.
>> Now, I'm not tell Berles as well. And I'm not telling you that they're not passionate about the subject. I believe that they are.
>> Yeah. But they also know that they have a group of people now that are riding with them to say, you know, if you make this happen, we got your back, right?
That's that's what's going to happen because they they made sure that they found a very passionate group of people.
And so that person who said that to her like, "Look, you're going to hurt your career if there's nothing that comes out of this thing." I I don't disagree with that.
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah. Yeah. And and and you know, I see Mythosaurus comment Luna's Looney.
Careful with that one. I in my opinion, if you run for office, you're out of your mind.
>> Like, who wants that life? So, I already start from that point. I'm just saying which one of these wild people are going to give us something to chew on here.
>> This is another this is another like it's today is today is point the comments at the imbecile. Um yeah, >> because like this you're an imbecile, >> bro. Come on. You never even watch >> you watched our show before.
>> You didn't even watch the beginning of the stream. I'm literally saying that like you could Come on.
>> Like [clears throat] for me, I hate I can't stand the left. I can't stand the right. They're all bunch of They're all >> If you're in a group Yeah. If you're Look, dude, Christian, you're I mean, you're much older than I am, but you know, that beard.
>> No, I know. [laughter] >> But I was going to say, uh, there was a time where it was like anathema to associate with a group of people, man.
Like, don't you don't, you know, hit your trailer to just random groups of people. To me, it's a weird thing to do.
Um, I'm more interested in in uh, you know, going with, you know, people who are consistent or honest or like, you know, even if people I don't agree with, I want to hear their takes on things because it challenges how I think of things if I think they're like legitimate people and sincere in their in their uh, in their motivation. So, uh, I don't give a [ __ ] about any of that. I I just want to see where this goes. I always go back to the George Carlin quote. you know, they ask him, "Hey, George, you're always talking about politics and and and global events. How do you stay so positive and and and and light, you know, he's like, "Hey, man." And someone just wrote it.
Uh uh Tran 3D465 says, "Hey man, it's a freak show and I got I just think I got front row seats to enjoy the freak."
>> 100%. This is the other thing too.
People who are trying to make this political are dopes because the whole this this topic, you know, now that's including the government because it's political. And the thing is it it shouldn't be because in the overall grand scheme of things, this is the most bipartisan thing that you can ever even, you know, uh, imagine. And that's why that 2023 hearing was so incredible because it was the only thing that I had seen that everybody was working together like we talked about AOC and freaking Matt Gates together working together to find out information. It was like back and forth like they were working together and it was it was insane. You never see [ __ ] like that. So when people ask, you know, dumb things about like for me, I I don't like to I don't I hate politics. I hate it. I hate politicians.
I think they're liars. I think you can't believe any of them. I think the less full I think the less full of [ __ ] I think the right's full of [ __ ] I think that, you know, they don't care about you. They don't give a [ __ ] about you.
Like I said, even with this topic, they want you, as Peter said, they want you to be on board with them so you'll eventually vote for them. They don't care about you and they don't give a [ __ ] about you. But it doesn't mean you can't use them to get information.
>> Exactly. You got to You're in the Matrix, right? Like you got to use the tools of the Matrix to get out of the Matrix. Like that's the lesson we learned from those movies. So, I don't know. I'm looking forward to it, Christian. I think it's a great day because it starts a conversation. It's a I don't think you put the genie back in the bottle to use that expression at this point. And so it's either going to be a conversation about like uh like pointed at like the the representatives you just mentioned, Luna Berles, etc. Burch, like that's what you guys fought for, these 10 videos that look like everything else we've seen.
>> Or it's going to be a conversation about like, okay, we're starting off here. Did you see that stuff? We're going to turn up the heat a little bit. You ready?
Okay. Boom. Either way, dude, I'm down to watch this come together and see where it goes.
>> Me, too. We'll wrap this in a second, too. I wanted to ask you because this is a great comment. I wonder if there's more videos than my >> Dude, I always Okay, can I tell you something about this?
>> Because we talked real quick. We You and I talked about this. We went through so many different phases of that thing.
>> Yes, dude.
>> We That was the one that turned our brain around from saying because you you and I just immediately dismissed it when I came.
>> Yes. And I'll tell you why. Cuz Miami people are full of [ __ ] And I'm from here. I [laughter] >> He's from it. That's why he said that.
So, but like but the thing is what I've decided from that is in the same way I tell people this.
>> I don't know. I have no answers because I wasn't there. And I'm talking with anything. I don't just shun people away and say you're wrong, right?
>> Right away. When it comes to this, if you say, "Look, if you say I don't believe any of this stuff because I go, I can't tell you you're wrong." No.
>> But if it's the definitive stuff to me now that I won't do anymore in the way that I did for that Miami Mall thing, but do you think what if something comes out in the file?
>> I'll tell I'll give you another one. I The Miami Mall isn't even the juiciest one that I keep thinking about all the time. The one that I keep thinking about all the time is that kid who had the cops go to his backyard with his family who said he's that to me, guys, that one is fascinating. Has a lot of good pieces to the puzzle and just no one talks about it anymore.
>> What about Baria?
>> I mean, yeah, come on. Barginia is a is a nice quarter pounder with cheese there. There's a lot to chew on. But I'm talking about the I'll tell you about the Miami Mall one.
>> Yes. Go ahead.
>> What I don't remember if I've ever spoke to you this uh about this or not. I have I have a buddy who is like really really high up in the Miami Police Department.
Okay.
>> He's also I've known him for decades.
Okay. Right. And uh he's a good guy, you know, the kind of guy that gets into the force and like immediately goes, "Holy [ __ ] like there's a lot of corruption in here." That kind of thing, right?
>> So, a good one. Immediately I call him.
I go, "Bro, what happened there, dude? I don't need you to tell me like what happened alienwise, but why were there 500 cars?" And it's not really a story.
and he immediately goes into the like try to do a quick joke that like, oh, you thought it was an alien type of thing and then I can't get him to talk about it anymore. That's all I'm going to say. Like it it's weird. It's I'm not saying anything.
>> I also think I'll say this, >> this is might be a blanket statement, >> but I don't think a lot of the kids in Miami are that creative. Like the story they came up with was pretty great.
>> And so, >> but I don't know, man. I don't know. I don't know what to tell what to say anymore. I'm at this point in my life where like you, Christian, I don't just dismiss things on face value. I'm interested. I want to hear things. I do.
I think we're in a world where something really does happen. There will be grifters to try to make money off a real thing. And I also think if something doesn't happen, there will be grifters try to make money off of that real thing. But what are we going to do?
Throw the baby out with the bath water every time?
>> Well, there's a lot more to be said on this one. And I'm sure you and I if if there's more when these files drop like this, we can do this.
>> We'll do file drops. We'll do a little morning >> and we'll get in we'll get early in front of all the other YouTubers. We'll beat them all cuz we're on the East Coast.
>> Hilarious. But I don't >> And it is a competition. Okay.
[laughter] >> And it is. And we'll set the tone.
>> It is not. But what we can do though for sure is when this happens again um and hopefully it happens because they said within the weeks, right? It's going to happen. So we can we can do it again.
We'll jump on. I don't think there's anything in there.
>> Are we getting red carpet to disclosure day? You >> No, you know what is funny is that Oh, you know what? Um here's the other thing. You know, here's the other this is hilarious, too. Um I That is the history. I've never banned a a super chat in my life.
>> I was going to say if you're going to get put them super chat more money if you're going to >> I just banned a super chat. Comic love.
I've never done it before. That was the first I've ever done that. Comic lover night. Peter, welcome back. You sack of Oh, wait. Wrong. [laughter] >> Thanks, Dad.
>> The new show. Uh and then WY sending support. Thank you, Wy. So, there we go.
>> That's funny.
>> Um, okay. Listen, thank you guys for being here. Peter, where can uh where can the people find you if they want to find out? You're looking >> I'm online everywhere at Attack Peter.
Uh, yeah, I just I just uh dropped a new uh cover for Godzilla the Odyssey from IDW, a comic book. Uh, if you're into that kind of stuff, I'm I'm dropping it.
But you can find me anywhere online at AttackPeter. I do a lot of artwork and prints and figures and stuff like that.
So, >> thank you. Thank you for Peter for being here. Thank you guys for being here. And for 97% of you, thank you for being classy and and fun when we talk about this stuff and appreciate you guys asking questions. Continue to ask questions. That's the most important thing. So once again, thanks again, Apple Podcast, Spotify, anywhere podcast found, both channels, both the Down to Earth and Chris Harlo show. Appreciate you guys. See you soon.
[music] >> [music]
Related Videos
Spiral Galaxy NGC 3370 from Hubble | NASA APOD 2025-11-05 #Shorts
galaxygallery
938 views•2026-05-30
SOMETHING inside the SUN is CHANGING
RaysAstrophotography
1K views•2026-06-03
Captured the Blue Moon (with a twist) 🌙✨ #space #bluemoon #telescope
realAstroExplorer
674 views•2026-06-01
10 Planet Where a Black Hole Replaces the Sun
cosmicexplorer-EN
147 views•2026-06-02
There May Be A Giant Hole In The Universe... And We Might Be Inside It | The Cosmic Ledger Entry 015
TheCosmicLedger
145 views•2026-05-31
Is this a copy of our galaxy? Discover Galaxy M81!
UniverseDocumentaries-cc4mb
995 views•2026-05-31
The Map We Sent to the Stars in 1977 — Why Scientists Now Regret It
TheAncientRecord7
183 views•2026-06-03
James Webb Just Captured the Cranium Nebula in Unprecedented Detail
ChrisPattisonCosmo
916 views•2026-06-03











