This sentence underscores the uncompromising reality of accomplice liability, where the law prioritizes collective deterrence over individual degrees of participation. It serves as a grim reminder that there are no small roles in a murder plot, regardless of who pulled the trigger.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Julio Foolio Murder Plot Accomplice Sentenced to 15 Years Behind BarsAdded:
Thank you.
>> You're welcome. You get to stand and put it in.
here.
This This was emailed directly to my email. Have no idea who it's from. Um, if you can give a copy to defense and I gave you a copy.
You're welcome.
It's already I forgot.
Miss Ryland, you there?
>> Yes.
>> Good morning. Um, it's 8:30, so I want to go ahead and get started.
>> Yes, your honor. Lindy arrived on behalf of Mr. Martz Wimbush. He's present in custody, your honor.
>> Okay.
>> And where are we at on this case?
>> Your honor, this is a reset from pre-trial to give Mr. when Bush time to hire private counsel. His family has uh retained Mr. Life Malcolm on the appending misdemeanor case. I have spoken to Mr. Malcolm. There seemed to be a miscommunication about the representation. Um he is actually out the country has not actually had an opportunity to speak with Mr. Limbush in the jail. Mr. Malcolm's requesting additional time so they can communicate about the actual representation of the felony cases. But he is they have made contact with him. They have resigned a detainer for a misdemeanor case. I think the miscommunication >> felony.
>> Yes, your honor. There seems to be some miscommunication because while talking with his family, Mr. Malcolm was out the country and he's just requesting additional time for them to meet and hash out that.
>> And does anybody know when he's going to be back in the country?
>> I believe he's returning today. Y, it was really hard to hear him, but he might be returning today.
But he did ask until next Monday to have an opportunity to speak with him.
>> Okay. Um, so what I'm going to do is I'm just going to keep him on the trial docket, okay, >> for Tuesday morning. And I'll, um, if Mr. Mal decides to represent him, we'll address the trial on Tuesday morning.
And if he doesn't, we'll address the trial on Tuesday morning. Um, either way, we can I want the state to be prepared to go forward.
>> Yes, with the trial next week. Okay.
>> Thank you, honor.
>> All right. And just roll over. I think he has an exception status. Just roll that over for Tuesday the 26.
>> All right. Thank you.
>> And are we still waiting on >> He's speaking to his client right now.
>> He's right here.
>> Okay. I can't see behind >> Mr. Hill.
>> Mr. Hill, I apologize. You You need a moment to speak with your client.
>> You could. Yes. I I have a sentencing that I have quite a few folks in here for. I can start my sentencing and you can speak to them for the next hour or two hours. Doesn't matter to me. Or do you think you need another five minutes?
I'm just I I just need to ascertain that.
>> Okay. Yes, if we could address this after.
>> Okay. All right.
Okay. So, uh we we are set here for some motions on Alicia Andrews case number 24 CF-11996 and a sentencing as well. Uh should it go that far? And let's go ahead and make sure everybody's here on the record.
State of Florida. Mr. Doy, are you going to be representing the state?
>> Yes, your honor.
>> All right. And is the defense here? Do you all want to please put your names on the record?
Good morning, Judge Jeremy McClemont on behalf of Alicia Andrews.
>> Okay.
>> Robert Strickland on behalf of Alicia Andrews.
>> Okay.
>> Um so the first thing that I that I want to address is um just to put on the record is I did read all of the transcripts that were provided to me a couple months ago. It took me a while to go through them. I successfully read out the transcript. Um, and I I did an evidence view of the things that were in evidence. Um, there were a lot of things that were missing from from evidence because they were in the trial of the codefendants up until I think Monday.
Uh, my clerk did deliver to me all the items that were marked on the exhibit list that um were in possession of the clerk of the court and the codefendants case. Um and I did receive those on Monday and I did review all of all of the evidence um in this case. Uh, additionally, I had requested originally when uh, this case was transferred to me, uh, I had requested that the attorneys place all of their arguments with respect to any motions, um, including motions for judgment of acquittles or motions for um, reconsideration of previous rulings by the predecessor judge in writing. I had advised council that I wanted them to place them in writing along with any case law that they were going to be relying upon. And I asked the state also to file a response to the defendants's motions because I had advised council that I was going to make my rulings based on the written motions and the replies that the state provided to me um and the case law that you were relying upon. So, uh, I will place on the record that the court did in fact read the defendants's, uh, motion to reconsider previous pre-trial and trial rulings and second amended motion for judgment of a quiddle notwithstanding the verdict and/or motion for new trial. The court also read uh, the state's response to defendants's motion to reconsider previous pre-trial and trial rulings and second amended motion for judgment of quiddle notwithstanding the verdict and/or motion for new trial. I of course also reviewed everything that was in the court file. Um, and I am going to place on the record it's the rule of judicial administration 2.330 subsection J. And I think both of you all cited that rule in your motions as well as in the state's response uh that it is uh discretionary and I'll cite the rule. Um, subsection J says, "Prior factual or legal rulings by a disqualified judge may be reconsidered and vacated or amended by a successor judge based upon a motion for reconsideration, which must be filed within 30 days of the order of disqualification unless good cause is shown for a delay um in moving for reconsideration or the grounds for reconsideration exists. Uh so that is discretionary. It is not mandatory for for a judge to do that. But I will tell you um that in in this case um I am going to decline uh to reconsider um any of the previous rulings by my predecessor judge and that's based upon my review of the court file, my review of the transcripts and my review of everything that council for both sides has provided to me. But I will also place on the record that I did uh go through each and every single one of the defense's assertions with respect to previous rulings uh that my predecessor judge made with respect to for instance the admission of or non-admission of evidence with respect to domestic violence. Um, and I'm not going to go through all of them, but I know that there was disagreements with respect um to the charge conference. I know that there was disagreement with respect to the um admission of text messages. I know that there was disagreement with respect to the principal instructions.
Um, and after having even reviewed all all of the defense's uh assertions as to um the defense's argument with respect to uh errors made by my predecessor, judge, I'm going to place on the record that I would not have ruled any differently.
So, there you have it. Um, and for the record, I'm going to deny your motion for a judgment of a quiddle, which was included in your motion for reconsideration of the previous um, rulings by the predecessor judge. And I will also place on the record that I'm going to deny um, the motion for judgment of quiddle after the jury's verdict um, as well. So at this juncture, unless there is any legal reason why either side believes that I have not addressed everything that we cannot proceed to sentencing, please speak up and I'll start with the state.
>> Judge, I believe that is all the matters that we're um wait awaiting a ruling. So I think that we can proceed to sentencing >> and defense.
>> We're still missing a ruling on a motion for new trial. And I will deny that motion as well after having reviewed every the court file as well as uh the motion the defense's motion and the state's response.
Uh other than that, um are there any other outstanding issues that the defense believes the court needs to address prior to legally proceeding to sentencing?
>> No, judge. If all of the motions have been addressed, then there's nothing else that we need to present to the court. So, the the other thing that I neglected to place on the record, there was a pres-sense investigation report that was ordered. Um, and I did read and review that as well.
>> Okay.
>> I'm sorry I interrupted you. Was there something else?
>> Oh, I just uh before we proceed, can I have a moment with M?
>> Sure.
And I don't have I don't have um any preference as to whether or not the state has I don't know if the state has any witnesses. Is there going to want the court to hear from? If you all want to go first or I don't have any preference if the defense has any witnesses uh them going first.
>> Judge, we do have um the victim's mother and I told she is actually on her way up so she should be here shortly.
>> Okay.
Let me know then uh when the defense is ready after you've had an opportunity to speak with Miss Sanders.
Double check if the profile is that sample there means that it's in the attached to Is the defense ready?
>> Uh, yes.
>> Okay. I just I couldn't tell.
>> Um, The other thing that I want to place on the record is I received a really odd email Thursday. I have no idea what who sent me that email. Um, it does have the case style name of Miss Andrews on it. I can't make heads or tails of of um what it even means, but because I received some sort of direct email to my work email address um in reference to this case, I did make a copy for both the state and the defense. Um and I put the uh copy in the court file.
All right. So, did we decide um did did you want to go first? Did the defense have any witnesses that you all want me to hear from?
>> No, judge. The defense will not be calling any witnesses.
>> Okay. And so we're waiting.
>> Judge, she is here. Miss Mace is here.
>> Okay. So I'll go ahead and I'll let the state call their witnesses.
>> The state would call CR and then we'll ask our victim advocate to come up as well.
>> Okay.
>> She can have a seat in the witness chair.
>> I just think it's easier.
All right, ma'am. If I can once you get see if I can get you to raise your right hand right here.
>> That's all right. Can you solve square or affirm to tell the truth, the whole truth? And I can tell that the truth.
>> Yeah.
>> All right. You may put your hand down if I can get you to state your name for the record.
Okay.
>> Judge, she has um provided a written statement that you would like to read for the court.
>> Okay.
To the honorable judge, my name is Sandri May and I'm the mother of Charles Jones, known to me as Julio Fulio. I stand before this court carrying the pain that no mother should ever have to endure. My son was more than a rapper, a public figure. He was my child. He was deeply loved by his family, for his friends, and the people whose lives he touched. Since since the day he was taken from us, my life has never been the same. The actions connected to this case did not just take one life. They destroyed an entire family emotionally, mentally, and spiritually. My son was hunted, followed, and ultimately murdered in what authorities describe as a coordinated plot involving multiple individuals.
It is extremely painful to hear Alicia Andrews portray herself as someone who didn't know what was going on. While evidence and testimony showed she traveled with the others, tried my son move fence and remained involved throughout the events leading to his death. Whether she pulled the trigger or not, my son would still be alive today had people not participated in carrying out this plan.
A mother lives with instinct and intuition. And mine tells me that this was not ignorance. This was participation. It was calculated. They planned it on my way driving here. Every second, every minute, every hour. They could have changed their mind. They could have turned around. But yet and still they carried on the plan to hunt my son down like a deer in the woods like they were hunting.
This was loyalty to violence over humanity. My son was treated like his life did not matter. He was ambushed and rob of the chance to grow older, become a father one day, continue his career and simply live. Every birthday, holiday, and family gathering is now filled with grief. I replay the memories of my son constantly. I think about his laugh, his voice, and the moments we will never get back. The trauma from his this loss follows me every single day.
No sentence will ever bring Charles right to me. But accountability matters.
Alicia family can can see her. They can talk to her. She can see her child. But I can't see my child. I have to go to visit him in a wall at the cemetery.
I asked the discord to remember that behind every headline is a real family suffering permanent damage.
My son life mattered. He was not disposable. The emotional devastation caused by this murder reaches far beyond the courtroom and will affect my life forever. I respectfully asked the court to impose a sentence that reflects the seriousness of the role Alicia Andrews played in the events that led to my son's death because she knowingly knew what was going on. Choices were made and those choices had deadly consequences. Thank you for allowing me to speak on behalf of my son, Charles Jones.
Any questions?
>> No, your honor. Does this have any questions?
>> No, judge.
>> All right. Thank you.
>> Judge, that's the only witness that you're going to call.
>> All right. Um, and the defense not not intending to call any witnesses. Is that correct?
>> That's correct.
>> All right. Um, so I'll let the state present arguments with respect to the recommendation for sentencing.
>> Yes, your honor. We did um also receive the defense motion to take judicial notice where they listed I think eight different cases. Um >> I saw that was filed in the court file just for the record May 8th of 2026.
>> And judge I noticed that they were either manslaughter cases or leaving the scene of death. However, upon reviewing them um we did note that they are clearly distinguishable from the facts of this case. The majority of them were negotiated please and had reasons for downward departure. Some of them were um that was the only reason was a negotiated plea. Um others were mental disorder or unsophisticated manner, isolated incident. And judge, we would argue that those are completely separate and distinct from the facts that you have in front of you, judge. Um this case was um originally filed as a murder, too. The jury has spoken and we respect the jury's verdict. they have found her guilty of a manslaughter. Um but still the facts of this case are egregious. We are talking about a person who was hunted down. Um the people that actually pulled the trigger, they are going to be um sentenced later and held responsible for that. But what we're asking the court to do is to give this defendant accountability for her participation in this crime. And we are going to be asking for um she scores at bottom of the guidelines nine years um prison, Florida State prison. And we're going to be asking for a 15-year prison sentence based on the serious nature of this of this particular case and the way that it was um conducted and carried out and also based on the mother of the victim in this case also wanting a serious sentence reflective of the facts and nature of this particular case.
Judge.
>> All right. Thank you, defense.
>> Yes. Thank you, judge. So, we are asking the court not to give a 15-ear sentence in this case. We're asking the court actually to depart downward under 921.26 section 2 B judge. And that section specifically states the defendant wasn't accomplished to the offense and was a relatively minor participant in the criminal conduct. We believe that applies here.
We also believe there are some other subsections that apply, but that one in particular um just based off of the jury's burden in this case where there are four other codefendants who were uh convicted of higher much higher offenses that were actually facing the death penalty. The state recognizes that there was a difference between those codefendants and Miss Andrews and the fact that they were convicted and are likely to be sentenced or will be sentenced to life in this case. Um, Miss Andrews's role after having read all the transcriptions, gone to the trial is very much minor when compared to those codefendants um, in this case. So, we're asking the court to go below the guidelines. The reason why I cited or filed a motion to take judicial notice of the eight cases that I did send over to the court is not because those cases are mirror images of this case. This case is probably a unicorn. I'm not based off of the motions that we filed, right? the motions for retrial and motions for reconsideration. Judge, we obviously believe that the facts of this case don't amount to a manslaughter charge. There was no manslaughter here at all in this in this case. Uh and that was argued out in the motions and so I won't go over that. But this case to find another case that's exactly like it was not really our intent, but we don't know if that would actually fair it out.
Uh but that's not really our intent. The intent of filing a motion to take judicial notice of these eight cases is to a range of different sentences for people who've been convicted of either manslaughter or some sort of act that resulted in a death that wasn't an intentional act. Um, and so all of those cases, uh, if we go down the list, right, state of Florida versus Van Go Steedman, U, that individual received seven years in the Department of Corrections followed by eight years of probation. He scored exactly the same amount of total sentencing points as Miss Andrews. And in that instance, he uh made a statement, a spontaneous statement at the scene to officers that he shot him. I shot him is what were his words, right? Um in a situation like that, that's more obviously more egregious than any acts that Miss Andrews is accused of doing or committing. Um going down the line, uh Francisco Veo, uh the state of Florida, that was a 2000 case. In that situation, the victim was uh shot numerous times outside of a trailer park and was initially the the defendant was initially charged with seconddegree murder. He pled down to manslaughter. He received a 5-year sentence in the Department of Corrections. He had the same amount of uh total sentencing points as Alicia Andrew at 176. There are people who had even more total sentencing points. Uh Michelle Diane Young, uh that's the third case sited there. That individual had 180.2 two total sentencing points received a fiveyear sentence in the Department of Corrections followed by 10 years of probation. And all of these individuals that I list and and I won't go through each one, but it's all attached to the uh to the motion ticket notice. All of their score sheets, all of their uh arrest affidavits, the judgment and sentences, all these individuals, none of them got 15ear sentences. The state is asking for the max on someone who's never been convicted of anything before in her life. This is her first offense and for for reasons that are cited in the motions, the respon uh the replies, Miss Andrews will be taking an appeal on the case on the on the the jury decision and the um the rulings that were made in the trial, right? And so she does intend to uh have a new trial if the app court grants her. So she's not testifying here today and no one else, no witnesses are testifying here today for that reason.
So, we're asking the court not to take into account the fact that Miss Andrews is not on the stand testifying or or uh or that her parents are not on on the stand testifying on her behalf. And we're asking the court to depart, follow the guidelines to give her a credit, sir, and uh followed by 5 years of probation.
>> Anything else from any uh either side before I impose sentence?
>> No, your honor.
>> No, >> all right. All right. Right. So, the court having um obviously reviewed the uh trial transcripts, the court file, uh all the evidence in this case, the pre-sentence investigation report, um the argument of counsel, it's the judgment sentence, and order this court to adjudicate the defendant guilty, sentence her to 15 years in the Florida State Prison. You have 30 days to appeal the judgment and sentence. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed to represent you. You all let me know when you're ready on Cassell, please. Okay. Thank you.
question last.
Thank you so much.
Related Videos
BREAKING: Judge Kathleen Issues Emergency Arrest Warrant After Trump Defies Order
Frontora
2K views•2026-05-29
8 Hidden Things About Mackenzie Shirilla Netflix's 'The Crash' Didn't Show You
MarvelousVideos
2K views•2026-05-28
MP Garnett Genuis warns Canada’s MAiD system has ‘gone too far’
WesternStandard
187 views•2026-05-28
THE STREISAND EFFECT AT BARBARA STREISAND’S HOUSE! - First Amendment Audit
KULTNEWS
1K views•2026-05-30
Trump Impeachment STORM IGNITES as 29 Judges Vote for Conviction!!
DanielBriefDaily
2K views•2026-06-02
EBK Jaaybo Won’t Be Going To Trial?! | Criminal Lawyer Reacts
floridadefenseteam
404 views•2026-05-29
OFFICE HOURS: The Theft of Black Brilliance... AI and Intellectual Property (w/ Lisa E. Davis)
marclamonthillnetwork
2K views•2026-05-29
सुप्रीम कोर्ट में 5 जजों का शपथग्रहण समारोह #supremecourt #judges #oathceremony #shorts #ytshorts
Bharat24Liv
4K views•2026-06-02











