In consumer transactions, sellers must accurately represent products; selling a knockoff item as a legitimate brand (like selling a fake NutriBullet as a real one) constitutes fraud, not an 'as is' sale, and courts will typically award damages to the buyer even for small amounts when misrepresentation is proven.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Bust-Up over Bogus Blender! | Part 2Added:
You said you took the cups out, without even looking the base until after the-- I took the cups out to wash them.
I'm like, what is this?
And then that's when I contacted the defendant.
Yeah, you can respond to what you wanted to respond to, and then I'll open it up. SCOTT BROWNFELD: OK.
She was going to pay.
I said, OK, what's good for you?
And it's all in the text. She said, OK, Friday the 20th.
I said, OK, what time?
She said, after 5:00.
I said, OK.
So Thursday, the day before, I texted to confirm, hey, are we still on for tomorrow?
I never heard back.
So I texted her.
I said, I'm assuming you don't plan on giving me my money back, and no response.
That's when I proceeded to take out the small claims.
And I just want to say the fact that she's possibly accusing me of changing the stuff in the box is just ridiculous.
YODIT TEWOLDE: Yeah, I don't find you credible, ma'am.
SCOTT BROWNFELD: It's ridiculous.
YODIT TEWOLDE: To say you don't, but to claim that he swapped opt this out, that you looked at a NutriBullet, when you just testified that you didn't even know what a NutriBullet was, makes zero sense to me.
What makes sense is that when you opened the box, you saw the contents.
I'm not accusing you of replacing it, but you're the one who opened the box.
SCOTT BROWNFELD: But where would I have gotten something to replace it with?
RACHEL JUAREZ: But you're accusing-- but you're accusing him of that.
HELEN CORBELLA: Well, once it left my house, I don't know what happened.
YODIT TEWOLDE: At the end of the day, I found it very egregious that you were dismissing his complaints over $25.
Hold on, I'm talking.
That you were dismissing his complaints for $25.
Whether he wanted cash or is not your problem.
Give him the $25, Venmo.
He wouldn't have to-- HELEN CORBELLA: I could have.
Why didn't-- HELEN CORBELLA: He said no.
YODIT TEWOLDE: Who cares? - On the phone.
So how am I supposed to Venmo him if I don't have his Venmo?
He wanted cash under my mat, right-- RACHEL JUAREZ: Don't they have Cash Apps or-- --right then and there. YODIT TEWOLDE: --or numbers.
And I was working.
Why don't you just tell-- you could have told him.
Absolutely not true.
I would have taken it in pennies.
If she said, hey, come pick up 2,500 pennies, I said, OK, I'll be right over.
YODIT TEWOLDE: You could have also-- I would have that money anyway.
It's not true.
HELEN CORBELLA: But he only gave me 48 hours.
Like, he was like-- No, no, ma'am, he actually scheduled the meetup, when you were available, and you didn't follow through.
HELEN CORBELLA: I got called into work because there was a crisis.
Again-- again, but this is your mistake to correct.
Do you not understand that? And then you want to-- It wasn't a mistake.
YODIT TEWOLDE: --in here and sue him for $4,000.
Are you crazy?
HELEN CORBELLA: I've had to take off multiple days of work because of this. YODIT TEWOLDE: How?
Because he's suing me for-- YODIT TEWOLDE: You never met him.
--for $25.
YODIT TEWOLDE: You never met up with him.
How did you miss work?
HELEN CORBELLA: Because I had to come to court, and because he was messaging me, harassing me while I was trying to work.
YODIT TEWOLDE: You could've given him-- you could have given his $25 back, and you wouldn't be here.
Yeah, I wanted to.
RACHEL JUAREZ: You weren't trying to give him his $25 back.
You weren't.
All I know is he took it out of the box, looked at it, said, OK. - You don't know that.
Your husband's not here.
You didn't do the exchange.
Stop saying that.
HELEN CORBELLA: I don't think he'd lie to me.
YODIT TEWOLDE: You should have returned the money.
RACHEL JUAREZ: Are we done? - I tried.
YODIT TEWOLDE: No, you didn't.
And the last thing I want to address is you say that this is an as is sale.
If I say I'm going to give you a cat, but it's in the box, and then I give it to you, and it's a dog, that's not an as is sale, right?
An as is sale is, you know what, it turns out it was a bad motor.
It was a lemon blender.
As long as you didn't know, it's his problem, that it has a faulty motor.
But when he buys a NutriBullet, and it ain't a NutriBullet, that's not an as is sale, right?
We have what we need.
The parties are excused while we deliberate in this matter.
Thank you both. - This court is now in recess.
You can step out.
[theme music] So this reminds me of the $5 latte case that we had.
That we had someone sue over a $5 latte over principle, and I understood it.
It was annoying, but I got what the plaintiff was saying, and it's similar to what the plaintiff is saying here.
That this was something he bought.
He trusted that he was buying an actual NutriBullet.
The defendant made certain claims.
And for her to not make this right, and I think it was her resistance, like, you're almost bothering me, when you're in the wrong.
I think that's what the plaintiff was so emotional about.
But the defendant, for her to assert that the plaintiff came all the way down here and had swapped these items out in order to bring her to court over $25 is insane. I think that's what she did.
And that's why she sold it for cheap.
DAN MENTZER: Yes, yes, yes. - Yeah.
DAN MENTZER: And as you point out with as is sale, and typically, look, you bought this thing.
It's on you, unless it was misrepresented.
And we saw his picture of the listing, and it was misrepresented.
And then add to it that it was not a NutriBullet.
That's a whole other level of deception.
- Yes. - Yeah.
I'm thinking it was just the cups that were the problem.
Now, it's the entire thing.
I think she had to have known.
And when he said, today, I would have taken 2,500 pennies, I think he would have.
I think he would have gotten a truck, driven for his 2,500 pennies, and it would have been-- it would have been over.
I want to give him more than $25.
DAN MENTZER: Punitive?
No.
I just think what she did is so egregious, but that's probably-- that's me being as angry as the plaintiff is, and I think I need to resist that temptation.
So $25 in favor of the plaintiff.
And a nice little wrap on the-- See you later on the countersuit.
All right, so we have a verdict.
RACHEL JUAREZ: We have a verdict.
Related Videos
BREAKING: Judge Kathleen Issues Emergency Arrest Warrant After Trump Defies Order
Frontora
2K views•2026-05-29
8 Hidden Things About Mackenzie Shirilla Netflix's 'The Crash' Didn't Show You
MarvelousVideos
2K views•2026-05-28
MP Garnett Genuis warns Canada’s MAiD system has ‘gone too far’
WesternStandard
187 views•2026-05-28
THE STREISAND EFFECT AT BARBARA STREISAND’S HOUSE! - First Amendment Audit
KULTNEWS
1K views•2026-05-30
Trump Impeachment STORM IGNITES as 29 Judges Vote for Conviction!!
DanielBriefDaily
2K views•2026-06-02
EBK Jaaybo Won’t Be Going To Trial?! | Criminal Lawyer Reacts
floridadefenseteam
404 views•2026-05-29
OFFICE HOURS: The Theft of Black Brilliance... AI and Intellectual Property (w/ Lisa E. Davis)
marclamonthillnetwork
2K views•2026-05-29
सुप्रीम कोर्ट में 5 जजों का शपथग्रहण समारोह #supremecourt #judges #oathceremony #shorts #ytshorts
Bharat24Liv
4K views•2026-06-02











